1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of non-lethal weapons for immobilizing a live target for capture and more specifically to such a weapon having a wire-tethered projectile configured for long distance usage by employing wires carrying positive and negative polarities from a high voltage source and contacts for applying the voltage across the target, the distance between the contacts on the target being substantially constant irrespective of distance to the target.
2. Prior Art
This invention is intended as an improvement over the invention disclosed in previously issued U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,199 to McNulty, Jr. et al. That prior art patent discloses an immobilization weapon which employs a projectile launched toward a remote target and having two connectors for applying a high voltage discharge across spaced locations on the target. A key innovation of that invention is the use of a first connector on the projectile and a second connector contained within the projectile. The second connector is deployed after the projectile impacts the target by using a propulsion device for actuating separation of the second connector from the projectile at a selected angle so that the second connector impacts the target at a fixed spacing relative to the first connector impact location.
The discussion of the existing prior art in the '199 patent disclosure is quite thorough and comprehensive and is therefore hereby incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
A principal advantage of the '199 invention is derived from the fixed spacing between the first and second connectors. More specifically, because the spacing is determined by the design and configuration of the projectile and the second connector's orientation prior to deployment, the spacing does not change regardless of the distance traveled by the projectile before reaching the target. This contrasts with more conventional Taserâ„¢ projectiles which use two propulsion deployed connector darts which separate by a distance proportional to their travel distance to a remote target. Thus, these connector darts may be too close together at close targets and too far apart at distant targets. Therefore, these conventional Taserâ„¢ devices are severely limited in their range of effectiveness which the '199 patent disclosure reported as 3 to 12 feet.
There are two distinct limitations to the '199 invention. One such limitation is the use of only one second connector. Even though the '199 constitutes a significant advance of the then existing prior art, having just one second connector incurs the risk of an ineffective shot because the second connector may still fail to attach to the target or may entirely miss the target if the first connector is close to the edge of the target and the orientation of the projectile causes the second connector to travel beyond that edge. Another such limitation is the use of a secondary propulsion device to deploy the second connector. if the secondary propulsion device fails to activate or activates too early or too late, the operation and effectiveness of the weapon will likely fail.
It would be highly advantageous to exploit the innovative concept disclosed in the '199 patent, but in a manner which overcomes such limitations.
The present invention provides improved implementation of the immobilization weapon concept that employs a single projectile with multiple contacts. The present invention overcomes the aforementioned limitations by utilizing several contacts deployed in a pattern around the projectile and by obviating the use of a secondary propulsion device. The pattern of several contacts substantially increases the probability that if the projectile hits the target, an immobilization circuit through the target will be completed. The deployment of the contacts occurs as a result of the projectile impacting the target and causing a plunger to translate and thereby enable release of the contact arms. This simplifies the deployment as well as the projectile configuration and likely reduces the risk of misactivation or an ill-timed activation of the contacts.
In a preferred version of the disclosed embodiments, each projectile has at least two and preferably four contacts dispersed in a preferably symmetrical arrangement around the projectile. These contacts are formed as elongated arms which are folded aerodynamically behind the projectile during flight and which open about respective fulcrums to form an array of spider-like legs after impact. Pointed barbs are used to promote attachment to the target.
The preferred embodiment applies a disabling voltage across two opposing contacts of the four total contacts and then switches to the other two opposing contacts that are in perpendicular relation to the first two. This switching is rapidly repeated on a pulse by pulse basis to increase the likelihood of effective application of a disabling current through the target.
The aforementioned objects and advantages of the present invention, as well as additional objects and advantages thereof, will be more fully understood herein after as a result of a detailed description of a preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the following drawings in which:
One embodiment 30 of the invention shown in
Referring now to
Operation of the contact arms 36 upon impact with a target may be best understood with reference to
In the four-arm configuration, the present invention may also comprise a circuit shown in block diagram form in
Another embodiment of the invention herein is shown in
Having thus disclosed alternatives embodiments of the improved weapon, it will now be apparent that various other configurations are possible. By way of example, while it is contemplated to spring load each contact arm so that the arm movement will be more forceful, it is also possible to freely swing the arms into contact position at impact with the target. Accordingly, the scope of protection provided herein is not to be limited by the specification but only by the appended claims and their equivalents. Moreover, any claim term defined in the description should be given the broadest definition commonly ascribed to that term, as the specification is primarily for the purpose of providing illustrative examples of the preferred embodiments and is not intended to be limiting of the rights of exclusion afforded hereby.
This application is a continuation-in-part of prior pending application Ser. No. 11/110,201 filed on Apr. 20, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11110201 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 13646684 | US |