Electrical fault detection circuit with dual-mode power supply

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6532424
  • Patent Number
    6,532,424
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 11, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 11, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
An arcing fault protection assembly and a corresponding method determine whether arcing is present in electrical circuits. The assembly powers-up quickly without dissipating excessive heat while power is being supplied to the assembly. The assembly comprises a sensor, a broadband noise circuit, a controller, and a dual-mode power supply. The sensor detects a current flowing in an electrical circuit and develops a corresponding sensor signal. The broadband noise circuit determines the presence of broadband noise in the sensor signal and produces a corresponding output signal. The controller processes the sensor signal and the output signal in a predetermined fashion to determine whether an arcing fault is present in the circuit. The dual-mode power supply supplies power to the sensor, broadband noise circuit and controller using a first mode and later switching to a second mode. The first mode reaches steady state faster than the second mode.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the protection of electrical circuits and, more particularly, to the detection of arcing faults in an arcing fault protection assembly which includes a dual-mode power supply to power up the assembly quickly using an inefficient power mode, and then switch to a more efficient power mode after the second power mode reaches steady state.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The electrical systems in residential, commercial and industrial applications usually include a panelboard for receiving electrical power from a utility source. The power is then routed through protection devices to designated branch circuits supplying one or more loads. These protection devices are typically circuit interrupters, such as circuit breakers and fuses, which are designed to interrupt the electrical current if the limits of the conductors supplying the loads are surpassed. The power connection to the electrical systems is reestablished either by resetting the circuit breakers or by replacing the fuses. If the cause of the overload to the system is not removed before the circuit breaker is reset or the fuse is replaced, the circuit interrupters will again interrupt the electrical current to the system. The circuit interrupters, however, will not detect the power overload until the power supplied to the interrupter reaches steady state. Adjusting the power to increase the time for the circuit to reach steady state will cause the interrupter to overheat.




Typically, ground fault detectors interrupt an electric circuit due to a disconnect or trip condition, such as a current overload or ground fault. The current overload condition results when a current exceeds the continuous rating of the breaker for a time interval determined by the trip current. A ground fault trip condition is created by an imbalance of currents flowing between a line conductor and a neutral conductor which could be caused by a leakage current or an arcing fault to ground.




Arcing faults are commonly defined as current through ionized gas between two ends of a broken conductor or at a faulty contact or connector, between two conductors supplying a load, or between a conductor and ground. Arcing faults, however, may not cause a conventional circuit breaker to trip. Arcing fault current levels may be reduced by branch or load impedance to a level below the trip curve settings of the circuit breaker. In addition, an arcing fault which does not contact a grounded conductor, object or person will not trip a ground fault protector.




There are many conditions that may cause an arcing fault, for example, corroded, worn or aged wiring, connectors, contacts or insulation, loose connections, wiring damaged by nails or staples through the insulation, and electrical stress caused by repeated overloading, lightning strikes, etc. These faults may damage the conductor insulation and cause the conductor to reach an unacceptable temperature.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the present invention to provide an arc fault and ground fault detection system that includes a dual-mode power supply to quickly power up the system and allow it to detect faults quickly after power is supplied to the system, i.e., after the system is reset.




Other and further objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the present specification taken with the accompanying drawings and appended claims.




In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided an arcing fault and ground fault detection system comprising at least one sensor responsive to a current flowing in an electrical circuit for developing a corresponding sensor signal; a fault detector responsive to the sensor signal for detecting arcing faults and ground faults and producing corresponding output signals; a dual-mode power supply connected to the electrical circuit and the detector for supplying a predetermined output voltage to the detector, the power supply having first and second modes with the first mode supplying the predetermined output voltage more quickly than, but drawing more supply current than, the second mode; and switching means for switching the power supply from the first mode to the second mode.




The above summary of the present invention is not intended to represent each embodiment or every aspect of the present invention. This is the purpose of the drawings and detailed description which follow.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a functional block diagram of an arc fault detection system embodying the invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of a dual-mode power supply in accordance with the present invention;





FIGS. 3-8

are flow charts illustrating the operation of the invention;





FIGS. 9 and 10

are block diagrams of an arc fault detector system and ground fault sensor in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 11

is a prior art tripping mechanism in the closed position;





FIG. 12

is a prior art tripping mechanism in the open position;





FIG. 13

is a prior art tripping mechanism in the closed position;





FIG. 14

is a prior art tripping mechanism in the open position











DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS




While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, a specific embodiment thereof has been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the invention to the particular form described but, on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.




Referring now to the drawings in initially to

FIG. 1

, there is shown in block form an electrical fault detector system in accordance with the invention, and designated generally by the reference numeral


10


. In the illustrative example, the fault detection system


10


is associated with an electrical circuit such as a 120 VAC circuit


12


which is to be monitored for faults. Of course, the invention is not limited to use with a 120 VAC circuit.




At least one sensor


16


is provided in association with the 120 VAC circuit


12


for producing a signal representative of a signal condition, such as power, voltage or current, in the 120 VAC circuit


12


. In the illustrated embodiment, one such sensor


16


comprises a current rate-of-change sensor (di/dt). A line conductor


14


of the 120 VAC circuit


12


passes through the rate-of-change current sensor (di/dt)


16


which produces a signal representative of the rate of change of current flow in the line conductor


14


. In the illustrative embodiment, both the line conductor


14


and a neutral conductor


18


of the 120 VAC circuit


12


pass through a ground fault sensor


20


which is responsive to the current flowing through the line and neutral sides of the circuit


12


for producing an output signal on conductor


22


. If the current flow through the line and neutral conductors is different, this is indicative of a ground fault.




Preferably, the di/dt sensor


16


and the ground fault sensor


20


each comprise a toroidal coil having an annular core which surrounds the relevant conductors, with a toroidal sensing coil wound helically on the core. In the sensor


16


, the core may be made of magnetic material such as ferrite, iron or molded permeable powder, such that the sensor is capable of responding to rapid changes in flux. An air gap may be cut into the core in certain instances to reduce the permeability, and the core material is such that it does not saturate during the relatively high current produced by some forms of arcing, so that arc detection is still possible. The particular requirements for the construction of the toroidal coil and core for the ground fault sensor


20


may differ somewhat for those for the di/dt sensor


16


, such ground fault sensors or transformers being generally known in the art.




During operation, the current in the monitored circuit


12


generates a field which induces a voltage in the di/dt sensor


16


. The voltage output of the sensor


16


is primarily proportional to the instantaneous rate of change of current. The calibration of the sensor


16


may be chosen to provide a signal in a range and frequency spectrum in which arcs can be most easily distinguished from loads. This range and spectrum may vary with the application.




The di/dt sensor


16


provides an input to an arcing fault detector circuit


24


which is preferably a broadband noise detector circuit and a current fault detector circuit


26


which is preferably a current measuring circuit. The ground fault sensor


20


provides an input via conductor


22


to a ground fault detector circuit


28


. In the illustrated embodiment, all of the components of the arcing fault circuit detector circuit


24


, the current fault detector circuit


26


and the ground fault detector circuit


28


, as well as some other circuit components to be described later, are provided on an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)


30


. Suitable output signals from the ASIC


30


are fed to a microcontroller


40


which, based on analysis and further processing of the signals provided by the ASIC


30


, makes a decision as to whether to send a trip signal to an output


42


for activating a trip circuit


44


which will in effect switch the line side conductor


14


of the 120 VAC circuit


12


to an open circuit condition as indicated diagrammatically in

FIG. 1

, or whether to allow the line side


14


of the circuit


12


to remain connected to a load


50


.




A dual-mode power supply


400


is connected to the power supply line between the trip circuit


44


and the ground-fault sensor


20


to allow the system


10


to power-up quickly and detect faults shortly after power is supplied to the system


10


, e.g., after the fault detection system


10


is reset. The dual-mode power supply


400


continues to receive power from circuit


12


without dissipating excessive heat while power is being supplied to the system


10


.




An example of a dual-mode power supply


400


used to supply power to the fault detector system


10


is shown in FIG.


2


. The present invention, however, is not limited to the particular dual-mode power supply shown. In a first, high-power mode, the dual-mode power supply


400


powers up very quickly and is inherently inefficient, consuming power at a relatively high rate. The second mode of the dual-mode power supply


400


is much more efficient, powering up more slowly than the first mode. Initially, the dual-mode power supply


400


is set to the first mode. After the second mode reaches steady state, the dual-mode power supply


400


switches to the second mode and turns off the first mode.




At the input to the dual-mode power supply


400


, a diode bridge rectifies the alternating current supplied from the power source


12


. Parallel resistors


404


,


406


connected to the positive pin


408


of the bridge


402


drop the supply voltage and limit the supply current. The supply current passes through a resistor


410


and a PNP transistor


412


(when this transistor is turned on) to charge a capacitor


420


. The charge on the capacitor determines the voltage on the input


418


to a voltage regulator


414


, and the output of this regulator


414


on conductor


424


is the output voltage+V (typically+5 VDC) of the power supply. The input voltage on line


418


is clamped by a zener diode


416


to prevent over-voltage. The input capacitor


420


also filters rippling from the voltage at input


418


, and an output capacitor


422


filters rippling from the voltage at output


424






When the power supply circuit begins to receive supply current, e.g., following a trip and reset of the breaker, the transistor


412


is turned on because its base is connected to ground through an NPN transistor


426


. The transistor


412


is initially on because its base is held low by a second NPN transistor


426


, which is also initially on because its base is held high by resistor


427


. When the control signal SELECT_IN goes high, the transistor


428


is turned on, which in turn turns off the transistor


426


and thus the transistor


412


turns off Thus the control signal SELECT_IN determines when the power supply circuit


400


is switched from the first mode to the second mode. This control signal may be programmed as a function of time, or may be produced in response to a predetermined +V output level.




As long as the transistor


412


is on, the capacitor


420


is charged at a fast rate because the current-limiting resistor


410


is bypassed. This quickly brings the output voltage +V up to the level required to power the ASIC


30


and the microcontroller


40


so that any existing faults can be quickly detected. This is the first mode of operation of the dual-mode power supply circuit


400


. Then within about 2 to 3 milliseconds, the SELECT_IN control voltage rises to turn off transistors


426


and


412


, thus reducing the current flow to the capacitor


420


and the attendant power consumption. This is the second mode of operation.




Referring still to

FIG. 1

, additional components of the ASIC


30


will next be described.




The broadband noise detector


24


comprises a high-pass filter


70


and first and second band-pass filter circuits


80


,


82


which receive the rate-of-change-of-current signal from the di/dt sensor


16


. The band passes of these circuits


80


and


82


are selected at frequency bands which are representative of a frequency spectrum typical of arcing faults so as to substantially (statistically) eliminate signals at frequencies which may occur on the line which do not represent, that is are not due to, an arcing fault. The frequency bands of the filters


80


and


82


are chosen across the spectrum from 10 kHz to 100 kHz. In one example, the center frequencies are 33 kHz and 58 kHz. In this example, the output signal from the sensor


16


is detected (rectified) and filtered with the high-pass filter


70


with a corner frequency of 5 kHz.




In the illustrative embodiment, the center frequencies are 35 kHz and 70 kHz, respectively. Each of the band-pass filter circuits


80


and


82


feeds a filtered signal, comprising those components of an input signal from the di/dt sensor which fall within their respective band-pass frequency bands, to respective threshold detector circuits


84


and


86


.




The threshold detectors


84


and


86


are responsive to those components of the frequency signals passed by the band-pass filters


80


and


82


which are above a predetermined threshold amplitude for producing a corresponding frequency amplitude output to signal conditioning circuits


88


and


90


. These circuits


88


and


90


produce a conditioned output signal in a form suitable for input into the microcontroller


40


. In the illustrative embodiment, these latter signal-conditioning circuits


88


and


90


comprise ten-microsecond one-shot circuits for producing a unit pulse signal. The output pulses generated by the one-shots


88


and


90


are ANDed at an AND circuit


96


whose output is fed to a “counter” input of the microcontroller


40


, as indicated in FIG.


1


. In the illustrative embodiment, a one-volt threshold is utilized by both of the threshold circuits


84


and


86


.




The use of the terms “band-pass filter,” “threshold detector,” “AND gate,” and “integrator” does not limit the invention to hardware implementations of these devices. Software implementations of these functions can be utilized, provided the di/dt signal (from sensor


16


) is first amplified and converted to digital values.




Referring still to

FIG. 1

, the current fault sensor or current measuring portion


26


of the ASIC


30


also receives the output signal of the di/dt sensor


16


. An integrator circuit


100


develops a signal representative of current magnitude in response to the output of the di/dt sensor


16


. This signal is fed to a further signal conditioning circuit portion


102


which includes an absolute value circuit as shown in

FIG. 1 and a

gain circuit


104


for producing a conditioned current output signal in a form suitable for input to the controller


40


.




The absolute value circuit


102


takes signals that are both negative- and positive-going and inverts any negative-going signals to positive signals while passing through positive-going signals unchanged.




The output of the absolute value circuit


102


is fed into the gain circuit


104


which in one embodiment includes a low current gain stage and a high current gain stage. Briefly, the low current gain stage applies a relatively greater amount of gain to relatively low currents so as to increase the resolution of the current signal for relatively low current levels. On the other hand, the high current gain stage applies a relatively lower gain to relatively higher current levels in order to maintain a full range of current signal levels through the circuit. The outputs of the respective low current and high current gain stages are fed to the microcontroller


40


.




The signals supplied to the microcontroller


40


are sampled by an analog-to-digital A/D converter that may be a part of the mnicrocontroller. In one embodiment, the output of the AID converter is a series of 8 bit (minimum) values representing the current at a rate of 64 samples per cycle. As the frequency drifts from nominal, the time between voltage zero crossings, detected by a zero crossing detection circuit, is measured using internal timers and used to vary the sample rate to achieve a constant number of samples per cycle.




Referring still to

FIG. 1

, the ground fault sensor


20


feeds a ground fault amplifier


120


and an absolute value circuit


122


which form the ground fault detector circuit


28


. The ground fault amplifier


120


essentially amplifies the low level difference in current flow between the line


14


and neutral


18


as detected by the ground fault sensor


20


. The absolute value circuit


122


is similar in its operation and function to the absolute value circuit


102


described above in that it essentially turns negative-going signals into positive signals and passes positive-going signals through unchanged.




The line voltage is also conditioned at a circuit


130


and fed to the microcontroller for further analysis and processing. This circuit


130


includes a line voltage divider (not shown) which divides the line voltage to a lower level suitable for further processing, a difference amplifier (not shown) which takes the output of the line voltage divider and level shifts it to circuit ground to be rectified, and an absolute value circuit. The voltage from the difference amplifier (not shown) is fed through the absolute value circuit which has the same configuration and function as described above for the previously described absolute value circuits. The output of signal conditioning circuit


130


is fed to the microcontroller


40


.




Referring still to

FIG. 1

, a watchdog circuit


140


takes a pulse input (Pulse_In) from the microcontroller


40


to check to see if the microcontroller is still active. If no pulses are present on this output from the microcontroller then a trip signal (Trip_Signal′) is sent to the trip circuit by the watchdog circuit


140


.




As indicated above,

FIG. 1

illustrates one embodiment of an application specific integrated circuit for performing the above-described operations. Further details of the construction and operation of the circuit of

FIG. 1

are described in the above-referenced copending application, Ser. No. 09/026,193, filed Feb. 19, 1998, which has been incorporated by reference.




Provision of the detector circuit as an ASIC is advantageous, in that it permits the circuitry to be readily incorporated into a variety of environments. This is mainly due to the small size and relatively modest power requirements of the ASIC. That is, this detector circuit can be incorporated not only in panel boards or other distribution apparatus, but could also be located at individual loads. This is true for industrial, as well as and commercial and residential applications. For example, the detector circuit ASIC could be incorporated in electrically powered industrial and/or commercial equipment or machinery, as well as in consumer products such as computers, audiovisual equipment, appliances or the like.




This invention analyzes current waveforms and broadband noise to determine if arcing is present in electrical conductors. A high current arc is identified as a current waveform that has a combination of changes in current (di/dt) and broadband noise (10 kHz to 100 kHz). The controller


40


increments a plurality of counters, which may be implemented in software, in accordance with the input signals received from the ASIC


30


. Table 1 summarizes high current arcing characteristic of current waveforms and how firmware counters are incremented. Flow charts of a program that uses the counters to determine if an arc is present are illustrated in

FIGS. 3-8

which are described below.




Conditions exist where loads have broadband noise, large (di/dt) and high currents under normal operating conditions. To distinguish between normally noisy load currents and arcing currents, the algorithms looks for different levels of (di/dt) broad band noise, high currents, decaying currents and current aspect ratios*.




Broadband noise is calculated as logically ANDing two or more frequency bands in hardware as described above. If broadband noise is present then pulses are received at the microcontroller input. The pulses are counted every half cycle, stored and then reset to detect broadband noise levels in the next half cycle.












TABLE 1











(each row characterizes an arcing half cycle)
















peak current





high frequency






high






with aspect




(di/dt)




broad band




high current





frequency






ratio* > 2




(dt** = 500 us)




noise***




arc counter




(di/dt) count




counter









>48A




>0.328 × peak current




not required




increment




increment




unchanged






>48A




>0.328 × peak current




present




increment




increment




increment






>48A




>0.203 × peak current




required




increment




unchanged




increment






>48A




>0.25 × peak current




required




increment




increment




increment











*Aspect ratio is the area divided by the peak for one half cycle. Area is the sum of 32 samples for one half cycle.










**dt is the time between every other sample of the current waveform. This sample time varies dynamically with the line frequency (60 ± 4 Hz) to get better coverage of the current waveform.










***High frequency broadband noise is the presence of broadband noise during the first 20 half cycles on power-up of the module with a load connected and turned on, and normal operation due to noisy loads at steady state (currents below 48A peak).













Arcing and startup current waveforms are analyzed by the controller using the algorithms described in the following description and the flow charts in

FIGS. 3-8

.




The firmware contains the following counters and other variables:




di/dt


1


(holds the maximum di/dt one half cycle ago)




di/dt


2


(holds the maximum di/dt two half cycles ago)




di/dt


3


(holds the maximum di/dt three half cycles ago)




di/dt


4


(holds the maximum di/dt four half cycles ago)




di/dt_counter (holds the integer number of times di/dt count has been incremented, specified in TABLE 1)




peak


1


(holds the peak current of one half cycle ago)




peak


2


(holds the peak current of two half cycle ago)




peak


3


(holds the peak current of three half cycle ago)




peak


4


(holds the peak current of four half cycle ago)




peak


5


(holds the peak current of five half cycle ago)




high_current_arc_counter (holds the integer number of times an arcing half cycle was detected from TABLE 1)




high_frequency_counter (holds the integer number of counts of high frequency of the previous half cycles)




high_frequency_noise_counter (holds the integer number of high frequency counts during startup or steady state (currents less then 48 A))




missing_half cycle (true when non-arcing half cycle follows arcing half cycle)




slow_rise (holds the value of peak


1


—di/dt


1


)




peak_ground_fault (holds the peak ground fault current of last half cycle) The counters described above are incremented and cleared in the following way:




If (peak


1


>48 A) then check the following:




If(di/dt


1


>(0.328×peak


1


) and high_frequency_counter>4 and high frequency noise counter<16)




increment di/dt_counter




increment high_frequency_counter




increment high_current_arc_counter




ElseIf (di/dt


1




22


(0.328×peak


1


))




increment di/dt_counter




increment high_current_arc_counter




ElseIf (di/dt


1


>(0.25×peak


1


) and high_frequency_counter>4 and high_frequency_noise counter<16)




increment di/dt_counter




increment high_frequency_counter




increment high_current_arc_counter




ElseIf (di/dt


1


>(0.203×peak


1


) and high frequency counter>4 and high frequency noise counter<16)




increment high_frequency_counter




increment high_current_arc_counter




If no arcing half cycle in 0.5 seconds after last arcing half cycle, then clear all counters




A line to neutral arc or ground fault arc is present under the following conditions of the above firmware counters:




If (ground fault>threshold)




If (peak currents>35 A for 3 half cycles and missing_half cycle is true and di/dt_counter>1 and high_current_arc_counter>1)




If (peak currents>35 A for 4 half cycles and missing_half cycle is true and high current_arc_counter>2)




If (peak currents>35 A for 5 half cycles and missing_half cycle is true and high_current_arc_counter>3)




If (peak currents>35 A for 5 half cycles and high current_arc_counter>3 and di/dt


1


>di/dt


3


and di/dt_counter>2)




If (peak currents>35 A for 5 half cycles and high_current_arc_counter>3 and di/dt


1


>di/dt


3


and high_frequency_counter>2 and di/dt_counter>1)




If (peak currents>35 A for>5 half cycles and<9 half cycles and high_current_arc_counter>3 and missing_half cycles is true)




If (peak currents>35 A for>5 half cycles and<9 half cycles and high_current_arc_counter>3 and di/dt_counter>3)




If (peak currents>35 A for>5 half cycles and<9 half cycles and high_current_arc_counter>3 and high_frequency_counter>1 and di/dt_counter>2)




If (peak currents>35 A peak for>5 half cycles and<9 half cycles and high_current_arc_counter>3 and high_frequency_counter>2 and di/dt_counter>1)




If (high_current_arc>6)




Start-up Algorithms:




If (peak


1


to peak


4


>35A and missing_half cycle=false) then check the following:




If (((peak


1


<(peak


3


−7A)) and (peak


1


<peak


2


)) and ((peak


2


<peak


3


) and (peak


2


<peak


4


−7A)))




tungsten lamp startup, clear the following counters




high_current_arc_counter




di/dt_counter




high_frequency_counter




ElseIf((peak


3


>peak


1


) and (peak


5


>peak


3


) and (di/dt


1


<peak


1


/2) and (di/dt


2


<peak


2


/2) and (di/dt


3


<peak


3


/2) and ((di/dt


5


+1.4A)>=di/dt


3


) and ((di/dt


3


+1.4A)>=di/dt


1


) and (slow_rise


1


>48A))




inductive load startup, clear the following counters




di/dt_counter




high_frequency_counter




Note: The numerical values in the above expressions are selected for residential applications. However, specific numerical values, current levels and counter values are not limited to the above specifications, but may vary for other applications.




As further illustrated in

FIGS. 9 and 10

, the ground fault sensor


20


comprises a ground fault current sensing coil having an output winding


302


. A ground fault neutral sensor coil having an output winding


300


is also shown in

FIGS. 9 and 10

. The di/dt sensor


16


is a toroidal coil having an annular core surrounding the line conductor


14


, and a di/dt winding


304


and a self-test winding


306


. The respective windings


300


,


302


,


304


form like-designated inputs to arcing fault and ground fault circuit


308


or separate circuits


310


and


312


.





FIG. 9

depicts the arcing fault circuits and ground fault circuits on one integrated circuit


308


, while

FIG. 10

depicts the arcing fault circuits and self-test circuit on a first integrated circuit


310


with the ground fault circuits on a second integrated circuit


312


. Although a trip circuit block


314


in

FIG. 10

is separate from the ground fault detector system


312


and arcing fault detector system


310


blocks, it may be integrated into either block.




In an effort to conserve space, both chip-on-board technology and resistor-on-board technology may be implemented in the arcing fault detector system


10


of the present invention. The chip-on-board technology takes the silicon die of a chip, places it on a circuit board and covers it with a plastic-like coating. This saves space over the traditional method of using a standard package. A similar idea is to use ball grid array (BGA) packages. These packages save as much space as the chip-on-board technology, but have the advantage of not requiring a clean room. They do, however, require X-ray equipment to inspect the chips. Many manufacturers of silicon chips, including SVI Public Co., Ltd., and Argo Transdata Corp., are now supporting BGA's.




Resistor-on-board technology is a screening process where standard resistors are screened onto a circuit board. Although screened-on resistors are not smaller length-wise or width-wise, they are flat. Therefore, other components can be placed over them. Multek (a DII company) manufactures boards with screened-on resistors.




Conventional tripping mechanisms for ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCI) in receptacles may be implemented in conjunction with the arcing fault detector system


10


. For example,

FIGS. 11 and 12

illustrate a prior art GFCI receptacle tripping mechanism.

FIG. 11

illustrates a tripping mechanism for a GFCI and/or AFCI receptacle in the closed position where current can flow though the receptacle to the load


50


. The current originates through a pigtail or other flexible conductor


316


, through a movable contact arm


318


, through mating contacts


320


and to a stationary contact arm


322


. The contacts


320


are held closed by a spring


324


, while one end of the movable contact arm


318


is supported by and pivoted about a latch


326


. A clapper arm


328


is held biased away from a trip coil


330


by a spring


332


with sufficient force to support the movable contact arm


318


in the latched position. A reset and trip indicating button


334


is normally biased into a receptacle housing


336


by a spring


338


.




When the trip coil


330


is energized by turning on an SCR or equivalent to short it across the line voltage, the clapper


328


is momentarily pulled to the closed position against a pole piece


340


, thereby releasing the latch


326


. As seen in

FIG. 12

, when the clapper


328


closes and removes the support from the latch end of the movable contact arm


318


, the arm


318


is free to rotate about the end of the reset button


334


at end


342


. The arm


318


then rotates until it contacts stationary surface


344


and opens the contacts


320


to disconnect the load


50


from the line


14


. The trip coil


330


, being connected to the load side of the contacts


320


, is de-energized when the contacts


320


open.




Although only one set of contacts


320


is shown in

FIGS. 11 and 12

, a second set of contacts and contact arms are typically provided to open both the line conductor


14


and neutral conductor


18


.




In the tripped state, the trip indicator


334


is biased out of the receptacle housing


336


, indicating that the device has tripped until the spring


338


is fully compressed. To reset the mechanism to its closed state, the reset button


334


is pushed into the housing


336


. This causes the contact arm


318


to pivot about the stationary surface


344


, raising the latch end of the contact arm


318


such that spring


332


pulls the clapper


328


back into the latched position. The reset button


334


is then released and the contacts


320


close, while latch


326


once again supports the contact arm


318


.





FIGS. 13 and 14

illustrate an alternate prior art embodiment for a GFCI tripping mechanism. In the closed position, as shown in

FIG. 13

, when current flows to the load


50


(see FIG.


1


), the current path is through a pigtail or other flexible connector


346


, through a movable contact arm


348


, through mating contacts


350


and to a stationary contact arm


352


. A spring


354


forces a trip indicator/reset button


356


in a direction outward from the receptacle housing


358


. The trip indicator/reset button


356


, in turn, pushes on lever


360


in a direction to force the contacts


350


to close. A notch on the lever


360


forms a latch


364


which mates with the contact arm


348


. A plunger bias spring


366


biases the plunger


368


out of a trip coil


370


and holds the lever


360


against the movable contact arm


348


in a latched position. A spring


372


biases the movable contact arm


348


toward the open position, however, latch


364


holds the contacts


350


closed.




When the trip coil


370


is energized by turning on an SCR or equivalent to short the trip coil


370


across the line voltage, the plunger


368


is drawn into the trip coil


370


against the plunger bias spring


366


, as shown in

FIG. 14

, and moves the lever


360


so that the latch


364


is released. With the latch


364


released, the movable contact arm


348


is free to rotate about a pivot


374


under the influence of the spring


372


. The contacts


350


are thereby separated, disconnecting the receptacle load


50


from the line. The trip coil


370


, being connected to the load side of the contacts


350


, is de-energized when the contacts


350


open.




Although only one set of contacts


350


is shown in

FIGS. 13 and 14

, a second set of contacts and contact arms are typically provided to open both the line conductor


14


and neutral conductor


18


.




In the tripped state, as shown in

FIG. 14

, the trip indicator/reset button


356


extends from the receptacle housing


358


, being forced outward by spring


354


, to indicate that the device has tripped. To reset the mechanism to its closed state, the trip indicator/reset button


356


is pushed into the housing


358


. This causes the lever


360


to move in a direction toward the movable contact arm


348


. With the trip coil


370


de-energized, the plunger


368


and lever


360


are biased away from the trip coil


370


by the plunger bias spring


366


. As the latch


364


on the end of the lever


360


moves past the latch surface on the movable contact arm


348


, the latch


364


is engaged. After the reset button


356


is released, the spring


354


once again forces the contacts


350


together, as described above.




While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. An arcing fault and ground fault protection system, comprising:at least one sensor responsive to a current flowing in an electrical circuit for developing a corresponding sensor signal; a fault detector responsive to said sensor signal for detecting arcing faults and ground faults and producing corresponding output signals; a dual-mode power supply connected to said electrical circuit and said detector for supplying a predetermined output voltage to said detector, said power supply having first and second modes with the first mode supplying said predetermined output voltage more quickly than, but drawing more supply current than, said second mode, and a switch for switching said power supply from said first mode to said second mode.
  • 2. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 1 wherein said first mode of said power supply reaches steady state faster than said second mode.
  • 3. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 1 wherein said detector includes a microcontroller receiving power from said power supply.
  • 4. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 3 wherein said switch sets said power supply to said first mode until said second mode reaches steady state, and said switch sets said power supply to said second mode after said second mode reaches steady state.
  • 5. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 1 which includes a current-limiting resistor for limiting the current flow in said power supply in said second mode, and means for bypassing said current-limiting resistor in said first mode.
  • 6. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 1 wherein said detector produces a trip signal in response to a determination that an arcing fault is present, said assembly further comprising:a tripping mechanism which stops the current from flowing in the electrical circuit in response to said trip signal.
  • 7. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 6 further comprising a ground fault sensor which detects a difference in current flow between a line conductor and a neutral conductor of the electrical device to determine whether a ground fault is present, wherein said detector also produces said trip signal in response to a determination that a ground fault is present.
  • 8. An arcing fault and ground fault detection system, comprising:a sensor which detects a current flowing in an electrical circuit and develops a corresponding sensor signal; a broadband noise circuit which determines the presence of broadband noise in said sensor signal and produces a corresponding output signal; a controller which processes said sensor signal and said output signal in a predetermined fashion to determine whether an arcing fault is present in said electrical circuit; a dual-mode power supply connected to said electrical circuit and said broadband noise circuit and said controller for supplying a predetermined output voltage thereto, said power supply having first and second modes with the first mode supplying said predetermined output voltage more quickly than, but drawing more supply current than, said second mode, and a switch for switching said power supply from said first mode to said second mode.
  • 9. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 8 wherein said first mode of said power supply reaches steady state faster than said second mode.
  • 10. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 9 wherein said switch sets said power supply to said first mode to supply power to said broadband noise circuit and said controller until said power supply reaches steady state, and said switch sets said power supply to said second mode to supply power to said broadband noise circuit and said controller after said second power supply reaches steady state.
  • 11. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 8 which includes a current-limiting resistor for limiting the current flow in said power supply in said second mode, and means for bypassing said current-limiting resistor in said first mode.
  • 12. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 8 wherein said controller produces a trip signal in response to a determination that an arcing fault is present, said assembly further comprising:a tripping mechanism which stops the current from flowing in the electrical circuit in response to said trip signal.
  • 13. The arcing fault and ground fault detection system of claim 12 further comprising a ground fault sensor which detects a difference in current flow between a line conductor and a neutral conductor of the device to determine whether a ground fault is present, wherein said controller also produces said trip signal in response to a determination that a ground fault is present.
  • 14. A method of powering up an arcing fault and ground fault detection system, comprising:supplying power to said arcing fault protection assembly using a first power supply; and switching the power to said arcing fault protection assembly to a second power supply, wherein said first power supply reaches steady state faster than said second power supply.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein said power is switched after said second power supply reaches steady state.
  • 16. A method of powering up an arcing fault and ground fault detection system, comprising:detecting a current flowing in an electrical circuit and developing a corresponding sensor signal; determining the presence of broadband noise in said sensor signal and producing a corresponding output signal; processing said sensor signal and said output signal in a predetermined fashion to determine whether a fault is present in said electrical circuit; and supplying power to said system in a first mode and then switching to a second mode, said first mode reaching steady state faster than said second mode.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein current from said power supply in said first mode is greater than the current from said power supply in said second mode.
  • 18. The method of claim 16 wherein said system produces a trip signal in response to a determination that an arcing fault is present, said method further comprising:stopping the current from flowing in the electrical circuit in response to said trip signal.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 further comprisingdetecting a difference in current flow between a line conductor and a neutral conductor of the electrical circuit to determine whether a ground fault is present, and producing said trip signal in response to a determination that a ground fault is present.
  • 20. An arcing fault and ground fault protection method, comprising:developing at least one sensor signal in response to a current flowing in an electrical circuit; detecting arcing faults and ground faults and producing corresponding output signals in response to said sensor signal; supplying a predetermined output voltage to said detector in a first mode that supplies said predetermined output voltage more quickly than, but drawing more supply current than, a second mode, and switching said power supply from said first mode to said second mode.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 09/129,685, filed Aug. 5, 1998, which is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 09/026,193, filed Feb. 19, 1998 which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 08/814,754, filed Mar. 7, 1997 is a divisional of Ser. No. 08/600,512, filed Feb. 13, 1996 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,682,101. Which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 08/402,678, filed Mar. 13, 1995 now abandoned. Which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 08/402,600; filed Mar. 13, 1995 now abandoned. Which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 08/402,575; filed Mar. 13, 1995 now abandoned. Which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 08/403,084; filed Mar. 13, 1995 now abandoned. Which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 08/403,033; filed Mar. 13, 1995 now abandoned. Each of the above applications has the same assignee as the present application, and is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (193)
Number Name Date Kind
2808566 Douma Oct 1957 A
2832642 Lennox Apr 1958 A
2898420 Kuze Aug 1959 A
2971130 Diebold Feb 1961 A
3471784 Arndt et al. Oct 1969 A
3538241 Rein Nov 1970 A
3588611 Lambden et al. Jun 1971 A
3600502 Wagenaar et al. Aug 1971 A
3622872 Boaz et al. Nov 1971 A
3660721 Baird May 1972 A
3684955 Adams Aug 1972 A
3716757 Rodriguez Feb 1973 A
3746930 Van Best et al. Jul 1973 A
3775675 Freeze et al. Nov 1973 A
3789295 Balchunas et al. Jan 1974 A
3812337 Crosley May 1974 A
3858130 Misencik Dec 1974 A
3868549 Schaefer et al. Feb 1975 A
3869665 Kenmochi et al. Mar 1975 A
3878460 Nimmersjo Apr 1975 A
3911323 Wilson et al. Oct 1975 A
3914667 Waldron Oct 1975 A
3932790 Muchnick Jan 1976 A
3939410 Bitsch et al. Feb 1976 A
4052751 Shepard Oct 1977 A
4074193 Kohler Feb 1978 A
4081852 Coley et al. Mar 1978 A
4087744 Olsen May 1978 A
4130850 Cronin et al. Dec 1978 A
4156846 Harrold et al. May 1979 A
4166260 Gillette Aug 1979 A
4169260 Bayer Sep 1979 A
4214210 O'Shea Jul 1980 A
4233640 Klein et al. Nov 1980 A
4245187 Wagner et al. Jan 1981 A
4251846 Pearson et al. Feb 1981 A
4264856 Frierdich et al. Apr 1981 A
RE30678 Van Zeeland et al. Jul 1981 E
4295021 Asinovsky et al. Oct 1981 A
4316187 Spencer Feb 1982 A
4344100 Broersma, Jr. et al. Aug 1982 A
4354154 Olsen Oct 1982 A
4356443 Emery Oct 1982 A
4378525 Burdick Mar 1983 A
4387336 Joy et al. Jun 1983 A
4459576 Fox et al. Jul 1984 A
4466071 Russell, Jr. Aug 1984 A
4477855 Nakayama et al. Oct 1984 A
4587588 Goldstein May 1986 A
4616200 Fixemer et al. Oct 1986 A
4631621 Howell Dec 1986 A
4639817 Cooper et al. Jan 1987 A
4642733 Schact Feb 1987 A
4644439 Taarning Feb 1987 A
4652867 Masot Mar 1987 A
4658322 Rivera Apr 1987 A
4697218 Nicolas Sep 1987 A
4702002 Morris et al. Oct 1987 A
4707759 Bodkin Nov 1987 A
4723187 Howell Feb 1988 A
4771355 Emery et al. Sep 1988 A
H536 Strickland et al. Oct 1988 H
H538 Betzold Nov 1988 H
4810954 Fam Mar 1989 A
4816958 Belbel et al. Mar 1989 A
4833564 Pardue et al. May 1989 A
4835648 Yamauchi May 1989 A
4839600 Kuurstra Jun 1989 A
4845580 Kitchens Jul 1989 A
4847719 Cook et al. Jul 1989 A
4853818 Emery et al. Aug 1989 A
4858054 Franklin Aug 1989 A
4866560 Allina Sep 1989 A
4878144 Nebon Oct 1989 A
4882682 Takasuka et al. Nov 1989 A
4893102 Bauer Jan 1990 A
4901183 Lee Feb 1990 A
4922368 Johns May 1990 A
4931894 Legatti Jun 1990 A
4939495 Peterson et al. Jul 1990 A
4949214 Spencer Aug 1990 A
4969063 Scott et al. Nov 1990 A
5010438 Brady Apr 1991 A
5047724 Boksiner et al. Sep 1991 A
5051731 Guim et al. Sep 1991 A
5121282 White Jun 1992 A
5166861 Krom Nov 1992 A
5168261 Weeks Dec 1992 A
5179491 Runyan Jan 1993 A
5185684 Beihoff et al. Feb 1993 A
5185685 Tennies et al. Feb 1993 A
5185686 Hansen et al. Feb 1993 A
5185687 Beihoff et al. Feb 1993 A
5206596 Beihoff et al. Apr 1993 A
5208542 Tennies et al. May 1993 A
5223795 Blades Jun 1993 A
5224006 MacKenzie et al. Jun 1993 A
5257157 Epstein Oct 1993 A
5280404 Ragsdale Jan 1994 A
5286933 Pham Feb 1994 A
5307230 MacKenzie Apr 1994 A
5321574 Patrict et al. Jun 1994 A
5334939 Yarbrough Aug 1994 A
5353014 Carroll et al. Oct 1994 A
5359293 Boksiner et al. Oct 1994 A
5363269 McDonald Nov 1994 A
5373241 Ham, Jr. et al. Dec 1994 A
5383084 Gershen et al. Jan 1995 A
5388021 Stahl Feb 1995 A
5396179 Domenichini et al. Mar 1995 A
5412526 Kapp et al. May 1995 A
5414590 Tajali May 1995 A
5420740 MacKenzie et al. May 1995 A
5424894 Briscall et al. Jun 1995 A
5434509 Blades Jul 1995 A
5444424 Wong et al. Aug 1995 A
5446431 Leach et al. Aug 1995 A
5448443 Muselleman Sep 1995 A
5452222 Gray et al. Sep 1995 A
5452223 Zuercher et al. Sep 1995 A
5459630 MacKenzie et al. Oct 1995 A
5473494 Kurosawa et al. Dec 1995 A
5477150 Ham, Jr. et al. Dec 1995 A
5481235 Heise et al. Jan 1996 A
5483211 Carrodus et al. Jan 1996 A
5485093 Russell et al. Jan 1996 A
5493278 MacKenzie et al. Feb 1996 A
5499189 Seitz Mar 1996 A
5506789 Russell et al. Apr 1996 A
5510946 Franklin Apr 1996 A
5512832 Russell et al. Apr 1996 A
5519561 Mrenna et al. May 1996 A
5531617 Marks Jul 1996 A
5537327 Snow et al. Jul 1996 A
5544003 Vaughan Aug 1996 A
5546266 Mackenzie et al. Aug 1996 A
5561605 Zuercher et al. Oct 1996 A
5568371 Pitel et al. Oct 1996 A
5578931 Russell et al. Nov 1996 A
5590010 Ceola et al. Dec 1996 A
5590012 Dollar Dec 1996 A
5602709 Al-Dabbagh Feb 1997 A
5608328 Sanderson Mar 1997 A
5617019 Etter Apr 1997 A
5629658 Chen May 1997 A
5638244 Mekanik et al. Jun 1997 A
5646502 Johnson Jul 1997 A
5657244 Seitz Aug 1997 A
5659453 Russell et al. Aug 1997 A
5661645 Hochstein Aug 1997 A
5682101 Brooks et al. Oct 1997 A
5691869 Engel et al. Nov 1997 A
5701110 Scheel et al. Dec 1997 A
5706154 Seymour Jan 1998 A
5710513 March Jan 1998 A
5726577 Engel et al. Mar 1998 A
5729145 Blades Mar 1998 A
5764125 May Jun 1998 A
5805397 MacKenzie Sep 1998 A
5805398 Rae Sep 1998 A
5812352 Rokita et al. Sep 1998 A
5815352 Mackenzie Sep 1998 A
5818237 Zuercher et al. Oct 1998 A
5818671 Seymour et al. Oct 1998 A
5825598 Dickens et al. Oct 1998 A
5834940 Brooks et al. Nov 1998 A
5835319 Welles, II et al. Nov 1998 A
5835321 Elms et al. Nov 1998 A
5839092 Erger et al. Nov 1998 A
5847913 Turner et al. Dec 1998 A
5886861 Parry Mar 1999 A
5889643 Elms Mar 1999 A
5896262 Rae et al. Apr 1999 A
5905619 Jha May 1999 A
5933305 Schmalz et al. Aug 1999 A
5933308 Garson Aug 1999 A
5963405 Engel et al. Oct 1999 A
5969920 Mackenzie Oct 1999 A
5982593 Kimblin et al. Nov 1999 A
5986860 Scott Nov 1999 A
6002561 Dougherty Dec 1999 A
6014297 Clarey et al. Jan 2000 A
6031699 Dollar, II et al. Feb 2000 A
6040967 DiSalvo Mar 2000 A
6052046 Ennis et al. Apr 2000 A
6084756 Doring et al. Jul 2000 A
6111733 Neiger et al. Aug 2000 A
6191589 Clunn Feb 2001 B1
6198611 Macbeth Mar 2001 B1
6215378 Gibson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229679 Macbeth May 2001 B1
6229680 Shea May 2001 B1
6232857 Mason, Jr. et al. May 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
2267490 Mar 1999 CA
2256208 Jun 1999 CA
2256243 Jun 1999 CA
2277589 Jun 1999 CA
2305910 May 2000 CA
2307812 Oct 2000 CA
0094871 May 1983 EP
0502393 Feb 1992 EP
0615327 Sep 1994 EP
0649207 Apr 1995 EP
0748021 Dec 1996 EP
0762591 Mar 1997 EP
0802602 Oct 1997 EP
0813281 Dec 1997 EP
0911937 Sep 1998 EP
0945949 Mar 1999 EP
0954003 Apr 1999 EP
0974995 Jul 1999 EP
0981193 Jul 1999 EP
1005129 May 2000 EP
2177561 Jun 1985 GB
2215149 Sep 1989 GB
2285886 Jul 1995 GB
06308191 Nov 1994 JP
WO9208143 May 1992 WO
WO 9730501 Aug 1997 WO
WO0011696 Mar 2000 WO
WO0036623 Jun 2000 WO
WO0039771 Jul 2000 WO
WO0101536 Jan 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Paolantonio, Antonio N., P.E., Directional Couplers, R.F. Design, pp. 40-49 (Sep./Oct. 1979).
Duenas, Alejandro J., Directional Coupler Design Graphs For Parallel Coupled Lines And Interdigitated 3 dB Couplers, RF Design, pp. 62-64 (Feb. 1986).
RV4145 Low Power Ground Fault Interrupter, Preliminary Product Specifications Of Integrated Circuits, Raytheon Company Semiconductor Division, pp. 1-8 (no date).
Joubert, Jean-Francois, Feasibility Of Main Service Ground-Fault Protection On The Electrical Service To Dwelling Units, Consultants Electro-Protection Ins., pp. 1-77 (Oct. 26, 1990).
Russell, B.D., Detection Of Arcing Faults On Distribution Feeders, Texas A & M Research Foundation, Final Report, pp. 1-B18 (Dec. 1982).
Continuation in Parts (8)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/129685 Aug 1998 US
Child 09/546510 US
Parent 09/026193 Feb 1998 US
Child 09/129685 US
Parent 08/814754 Mar 1997 US
Child 09/026193 US
Parent 08/402678 Mar 1995 US
Child 08/600512 US
Parent 08/402600 Mar 1995 US
Child 08/402678 US
Parent 08/402575 Mar 1995 US
Child 08/402600 US
Parent 08/403084 Mar 1995 US
Child 08/402575 US
Parent 08/403033 Mar 1995 US
Child 08/403084 US