The present invention relates generally to wind turbine generators and ship propulsion motors.
Wind is usually considered to be a form of solar energy caused by uneven heating of the atmosphere by the sun, irregularities of the earth's surface, and rotation of the earth. Wind flow patterns are modified by the earth's terrain, bodies of water, and vegetation. The terms wind energy or wind power, describe the process by which the wind is used to generate mechanical power or electricity.
Typically, wind turbines are used to convert the kinetic energy in the wind into mechanical power. This mechanical power may be used for specific tasks (such as grinding grain or pumping water) or a generator may convert this mechanical power into electricity. A wind turbine usually includes an aerodynamic mechanism for converting the movement of air into a mechanical motion, which is then converted with a generator into electrical power. Power output from the generator is proportional to the cube of the wind speed. As wind speed doubles, the capacity of wind generators increases almost eightfold.
The majority of commercially available wind turbines utilize geared drive trains to connect the turbine blades to the wind generators the wind turns the turbine blades, which spin a shaft, which feeds into a gear-box and then connects to a wind generator and makes electricity. The geared drive aims to increase the velocity of the mechanical motion. The drawback of a geared drive is that it reduces the reliability of the wind turbine and increases the noise and cost of the wind turbine.
A few wind turbines utilizing direct-drive generators are also commercially available. The large diameters of the direct drive generators present formidable transportation and assembly challenges, both at the factories and at the wind turbine installation sites. As the wind turbine industry matures and technology improves, larger power ratings will be required to continue the downward push in the cost of energy. Standard power ratings for land-based turbines are expected to be 3 MW or greater in the next few years, and the offshore turbines are expected to be 5 MW or greater.
For the wind turbines and ship propulsion motors to evolve to higher power ratings, conventional approaches typically include an increase in the direct-drive generator diameter or axial (stack) length. Increasing the diameter is preferred form a purely generator electromagnetic perspective, but is not attractive from the transportation, frame, and assembly perspectives, especially for land-based turbines. Increasing the axial length of the generators, while maintaining the diameter to be less than approximately 4 meters, alleviates the land-based transportation issue, but results in complex and costly frame structures with long axial lengths which presents a problem in that there is a limited amount of space available on board a ship. Also this also presents a problem of increased weight that reduces the efficiency of the motor in propelling a ship.
It is therefore desirable to provide cost-effective wind turbines and ship propulsion motors of increased power ratings and reduced diameters.
In accordance with another aspect of the present technique, a ship propulsion motor is provided. The motor includes a rotor with an inner rotor core and an outer rotor core, and a double-sided stator with an inner stator side and an outer stator side. The inner stator side and the outer stator side include a double-sided lamination stack. The double-sided stator is concentrically disposed between the inner rotor core and the outer rotor core of the motor.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
The present invention includes different embodiments for double-sided generators that are particularly useful for direct-drive wind turbines and ship propulsion motors. The different direct-drive configurations for wind turbines described herein below are based upon a double-sided, radial-flux, synchronous electrical machines. Although permanent magnet (PM) machines are described and shown for the purpose of illustration, other electrical machines such as wound field synchronous machines can alternatively be used. These configurations contribute towards achieving cost-effective wind turbines of increased power ratings (>2.0 MW) and are especially advantageous for land-based applications where the outside diameter may be constrained by transportation limitations.
Turning now to the figures,
Referring again to
Optional outer rotating seal 84 located between the stationary frame 34 and the rotor 14 provides further protection of the components of the double-sided stator 24 and rotor 14 from the environment. An optional inner seal 86 provides sealing between the stator and rotor components and the corresponding frame structures 34 and 52. The seals are preferably of a labyrinth or brush-type seal.
In operation, the power output of the double-sided stator 24 is controlled by a power converter unit (not shown) capable of full power conversion. The stator 24 is connected to a stationary frame 34, which may include structural stiffening members of ribs 35. A rotor shaft 46 connects to the rotor 14 via a rotating frame 52 at one end and to the rotor blade hub flange 54 on the other end, which connects to a turbine rotor blade hub (44 in
Also illustrated in
It would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other cooling techniques such as but not limited to forced-air cooling similar are also equally applicable.
The double-sided generator 12 as described in different embodiments hereinabove, offers several advantages over single-sided generators for wind turbines. The most significant advantages include reduced manufacturing and assembly costs, reduced stator mass, reduced machine outer diameter (thereby enabling land-transportation), and improved balancing of radial magnetic forces.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been described primarily in terms of wind turbines, the concepts are additionally useful in other applications with one example being ship propulsion motors.
Many of the specific rotor construction details are similar to the wind turbine embodiments and are not repeated here. The ship propulsion motor may also include a cooling duct for cooling the motor via passing a liquid cooling medium as shown in
In the present embodiment, the ship propulsion motor 912 is capable of generating approximately 7,000 horsepower (9,387 Kilowatts) based on an input of approximately five megawatts of input power. For larger applications, e.g., a NAVY ship requiring a motor that generates about 25,000 horsepower (33,506 Kilowatts) or more, an input power of approximately 18.5 megawatts may be required. For the applications where multiple motors 912 are employed, an operational mounting of the motors in a counter rotating arrangement is also contemplated in this embodiment.
while only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/951,329, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, entitled “Electrical Machine With Double-Sided Lamination Stack”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,192 and this application includes subject matter that is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/559,506, entitled “Electrical Machine with Double-Sided Stator”, filed concurrently herewith, and that is, in turn, a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/951,335, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, entitled “Electrical Machine with Double-Sided Stator”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,193, each of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1661135 | Knight | Feb 1928 | A |
3023330 | Rotors | Feb 1962 | A |
3789252 | Abegg | Jan 1974 | A |
4187441 | Oney | Feb 1980 | A |
4274011 | Garfinkle | Jun 1981 | A |
4517484 | Dacier | May 1985 | A |
4720640 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4761590 | Kaszman | Aug 1988 | A |
4866321 | Blanchard et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4900965 | Fisher | Feb 1990 | A |
5004944 | Fisher | Apr 1991 | A |
5229677 | Dade | Jul 1993 | A |
5311092 | Fisher | May 1994 | A |
5315159 | Gribnau | May 1994 | A |
5331244 | Rabe | Jul 1994 | A |
5334898 | Skybyk | Aug 1994 | A |
5731649 | Caamano | Mar 1998 | A |
5751089 | Stridesberg | May 1998 | A |
5831365 | Keim | Nov 1998 | A |
5977684 | Lin | Nov 1999 | A |
6177746 | Tupper et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6285090 | Brutsaert et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6459185 | Ehrhart | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6462457 | Shah et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488486 | Debleser | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504260 | Debleser | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515384 | Kikuch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6590312 | Seguchi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6720688 | Schiller | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744504 | Yokota | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762525 | Maslov et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6774527 | Furuse et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6794781 | Razzell et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794783 | Tu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7042109 | Gabrys | May 2006 | B2 |
7154191 | Jansen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154192 | Jansen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154193 | Jansen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20020047418 | Seguchi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030102676 | Rembert | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030193253 | Arimitsu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236036 | Varis | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040041409 | Gabrys | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040119373 | Akatsu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135461 | Miyake et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040195929 | Oshidari et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239199 | Qu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4023791 | Jul 1990 | DE |
4402184 | Jan 1994 | DE |
19636591 | Oct 1996 | DE |
19643362 | Oct 1996 | DE |
19704652 | Feb 1997 | DE |
1375913 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1394406 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1465326 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2823178 | Apr 2001 | FR |
53015502 | Feb 1978 | JP |
56053557 | May 1981 | JP |
56-074075 | Jun 1981 | JP |
56107767 | Aug 1981 | JP |
WO9939426 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0106623 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0121956 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 02057624 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070103027 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10951329 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11559509 | US | |
Parent | 10951335 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 10951329 | US |