The invention relates to an electrical machine.
Magnetic bearings are being increasingly used in electrical machines because no friction losses occur on them, as in the case of mechanical bearings. However, magnetic bearings have the disadvantage that disturbances can lead to their failure. (The simplest disturbance situation is a conventional electrical power failure). If the disturbance occurs during operation of the electrical machine, the shaft of the electrical machine is still rotating at high speed when the magnetic bearing fails. It is therefore necessary to provide so-called safety bearings, which hold the shaft in the event of failure of the magnetic bearings, and guide it at least while it is brought to rest, for example during transition from the state in which the shaft is moving to it being brought to rest.
A first approach in the prior art for refinement of the safety bearings was to use essentially conventional roller bearings. In this case, the shaft is guided in the roller bearing with play, in which case it is normally guided by the magnetic bearing, with the roller bearing acting as a safety bearing only when the magnetic bearing fails. Roller bearings are successful, particularly in the case of small electrical machines, in which the shaft is not heavy. Roller bearings have the advantage that the so-called “backward whirl” is suppressed, rotation of the entire shaft in the opposite rotation direction to the rotation applied to it, about its rotation axis.
Roller bearings are not suitable for holding large, heavy rotors: there is only a point or line contact between the roller bodies and the bearing rings, thus resulting in very high surface pressures. These high loads can damage the roller bearings and can block the bearing. In the case of large, heavy shafts, such as those which are used in turbocompressors for feeding gas, dry sliding bearings are nowadays used as safety bearings. Dry sliding bearings essentially comprise a ring which is mounted on the stator and in which the shaft can then rotate in the event of failing of the magnetic bearings. Since the risk of backward whirl rises as the coefficient of friction between the shaft and the safety bearing increases, the aim is to minimize the coefficient of friction by choice of suitable materials for this ring. By way of example, specific bronze alloys are used as friction coatings, but they are subject to severe wear.
The problem of wear in a dry sliding bearing is solved in U.S. Pat. No. 5,739,609 by splitting the ring in two: one ring element is attached to the stator, and a second ring element is mounted in the first ring element. In the event of wear on the inner surface, the second ring element can then be replaced. A sliding means is used in this case in order to make it easier to replace the second ring element. However, during operation the second ring element remains rigid with respect to the first ring element, which is attached to the stator, so that nothing is fundamentally changed with regard to the method of operation as a dry sliding bearing.
The object of the invention is to provide a safety bearing, in particular for large heavy shafts as well, in which the backward whirl is avoided, and which is not subject to severe wear.
According to the invention, the object is achieved by an electrical machine having a stator and a shaft which can rotate therein and is guided by magnetic bearings, with safety bearings being provided in the event of failure of the magnetic bearings, which safety bearings then hold the shaft and guide it while its movement is being brought to rest, wherein the safety bearing of the electrical machine includes an outer ring which is mounted on the stator in which a rotatable ring is guided in a sliding manner.
If the magnetic bearings fail, the rotatable ring is moved on the basis of the transmission of a force or of a torque from the shaft and then results in the shaft not being able to carry out arbitrary movements in an uncontrolled manner, thus suppressing the backward whirl. The rotatable ring is guided in a sliding manner with little friction. The coefficients of friction of the arrangement are thus low overall. (A rolling friction force is conventionally comparatively small). Since the forces are not transmitted at points or on individual lines but over the entire inner surface and outer surface of the ring, the safety bearing has a high load-bearing capability and is particularly suitable for use of large, heavy shafts.
In a first embodiment, the rotatable ring is an inner ring which surrounds the shaft with radial play. If the magnetic bearings fail, the shaft falls downwards under the influence of gravity, then makes contact in the lower area of the inner ring and can accordingly transmit forces and torques.
In an alternative embodiment, the rotatable ring is an intermediate ring. The intermediate ring surrounds a further ring, which is guided in it in a sliding manner. However, in this case, this may be an intermediate ring or directly an inner ring which surrounds the shaft with radial play. The use of one or more intermediate rings has the advantage that, in the event of a fault of the sliding guide, a further option for sliding guidance still remains (in the example between the inner ring and the intermediate ring) at an intermediate point (for example between the intermediate ring and the outer ring).
In one preferred embodiment, the sliding guide has little friction, to be precise in that a sliding means is inserted between the rings, or the rings are provided with a sliding layer. In the latter case, it is sufficient to provide the inside of the outer ring and the outside of the inner ring, and possibly the intermediate ring, internally and externally, with a sliding layer. By way of example, a layer such as this may be composed Teflon or a specific electric chemical coating. In the case of the other alternatives, conventional grease or graphite can be used as the sliding means.
In a further preferred embodiment, the outer ring has a U-shaped profile. One limb of the “U” is in this case removable. In other words, the limb of the U-profile is formed by a removable annular web. The capability to remove it is necessary in order that the inner ring and possibly the intermediate ring can be introduced into the U-shaped profile. The U-shaped profile makes it possible in particular to introduce a sliding means, but may also be worthwhile when using the sliding layer as mentioned above because, in any case, this prevents the inner ring and/or the intermediate ring from being axially torn out with its limbs (and thus also for example tilting of the inner ring). The angle between the two limbs of the “U” in the U-profile on the base of the “U” need not necessarily be 90° in this case, but the limbs can also, for example, be opened somewhat wider in order in this way to provide an opening angle of 100° to 110°.
One preferred embodiment of the invention is described in the following text with reference to the drawing, in which:
An electrical machine according to the invention comprises a stator 10, which is indicated schematically in the
In the case of a first embodiment, which is illustrated in
As can be seen in particular in
In one alternative embodiment, which is illustrated in
As can be seen in
The embodiment shown in FIGS. 1A/1B and FIGS. 2A/2B have the common feature that the forces act in a distributed manner over an entire ring, as a result of which there are no pressure points as in the case of roller bearings. In comparison conventional dry bearings, as a result of the fact that rolling movements are introduced, this means that the main contribution to the coefficient of friction is the rolling resistance, which greatly reduces the friction. The inner ring 22/22′ is therefore subject only to a small amount of wear.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 017 933 | Apr 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/052462 | 3/15/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/15/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/122044 | 11/1/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5714818 | Eakman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5739609 | Taniguchi | Apr 1998 | A |
6617733 | Yamauchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
20040189124 | Baudelocque et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 083 349 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 016 068 | Apr 1950 | FR |
2 614 375 | Oct 1988 | FR |
2004 132513 | Apr 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090302698 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |