Embodiments presented herein relate generally to a field of electrical machines and, more particularly, to an interior permanent magnet (IPM) rotor of the electrical machines.
An IPM machine (a type of “electrical machine”) is known for its high drive efficiency. Because of the efficiency, the IPM machine has been extensively used as a most common motor type in hybrid electric automobiles. The usage of this electrical machine has increased significantly over years.
The electrical machine comprises a stator and an IPM rotor. The rotor includes embedded permanent magnets. These magnets are restrained to rotor body against centrifugal forces using bridges or webs of the rotor body material. These webs and/or bridges provide structural strength to the rotor. Typically, these webs and bridges are made of magnetically conductive materials.
Efficiency and power delivery of this electrical machine is based on amount of flux transferred between the rotor and the stator. Leakage of flux around the magnets within the rotor limits the efficiency and power density of the motor by decreasing the flux transfer between the rotor and stator. The webs and/or bridges that provide structural support provide leakage paths for flux.
Known techniques discuss flux leakage reduction by means of reducing cross section area of webs and/or bridges. The flux leakage in these techniques is limited by maximum flux density that can be carried by the webs and/or bridges known as saturation flux density. Other techniques discuss flux leakage reduction by introduction of geometric irregularities, such as holes or slots in the webs and/or bridges. In this case, the total flux leakage would still be governed by the ability to limit the size of the magnetically conductive webs or bridges. In both the cases, the strength of webs and/or bridges that provide structural support and strength is reduced. Moreover, reduction in structural support increases mechanical stress in the webs and/or bridges during operation of the rotor. In order to maintain mechanical integrity in operation, webs and/or bridges of sufficient size and strength need to be provided to limit the mechanical stress. However, providing webs and/or bridges of sufficient strength and size causes an increase in the leakage of flux. This flux leakage significantly reduces the machine power density, and the machine efficiency.
Therefore, there is a need for reducing the flux leakage in the rotor without compromising structural integrity of the rotor assembly.
The above and other drawbacks/deficiencies may be overcome or alleviated by embodiments presented herein.
According to one embodiment, an apparatus includes at least one pole segment, at least one pole tip segment, and at least one permanent magnet pair. Each permanent magnet pair is disposed between the at least one pole segment and the at least one pole tip segment. The apparatus also includes at least one mechanical member that mechanically restrains the at least one pole tip segment to the at least one pole segment.
According to another embodiment, an apparatus includes at least one pole segment, at least one permanent magnet pair and at least one mechanical member. The at least one permanent magnet pair is embedded within the at least one pole segment. The at least one mechanical member mechanically restrains the at least one permanent magnet pair within the at least one pole segment.
According to yet another embodiment, an apparatus includes a stator and a rotor. The rotor is electromagnetically coupled to the stator. The rotor includes at least one pole segment coupled to the rotor shaft, at least one pole tip segment, at least one permanent magnet pair, and at least one mechanical member. Each permanent magnet pair is disposed between the at least one pole segment and respective pole tip segment. The at least one mechanical member mechanically restrains the at least one pole tip segment within the rotor shaft or the at least one pole segment.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present system and techniques will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
Various embodiments presented herein describe an electrical machine. The electrical machine includes, inter alia, a stator and an apparatus such as an IPM rotor electromagnetically coupled to the stator. Examples of the electrical machine include, but are not limited to a motor and a generator. The rotor, according to embodiments as described herein, may be designed to reduce intra-pole and inter-pole magnetic flux leakages. In accordance with various embodiments, the design may eliminate the need for the webs and/or the bridges to provide structural support and strength to the rotor. In one embodiment, the electrical machine as illustrated herein is suited for high speed operations in automotive applications. However, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that various embodiments may also be deployed for other applications as well. Examples of other applications include devices for power delivery, transmission, or generation in aerospace, marine, turbo-machinery, and nuclear industries.
An example implementation of a rotor within a stator is illustrated in
Stator 102 is configured with stator windings to generate a stator magnetic field when excited with alternating currents and extends along a radial axis. The magnetic field generated by IPM rotor 104 interacts with the stator magnetic field to produce a torque.
Rotor shaft 202 may be made of an alloy, for example, carbon steel. The rotor shaft is a component rotatable about an axis. In one embodiment, rotor shaft 202 includes a first mechanical feature such as slots 212B to receive pole segments 204A-B.
In one embodiment, mechanical member 210 is used to restrain pole tip segment 208 to rotor shaft 202. Mechanical member 210 may include coupling pins 214A on opposite sides, designed to be coupled with mechanical features on rotor shaft 202 and pole tip segments 208. In one example embodiment, as illustrated in
Permanent magnet pair 206 is disposed and mechanically restrained between pole tip segment 208 and pole segments 204A-B forming a geometric arrangement. Geometric arrangement is formed by designing pole segments 204A-B and pole tip segment 208 appropriately, an example of which is illustrated in
When pole tip segment 208 is restrained to rotor shaft 202 through mechanical member 210, the geometric arrangement mechanically restrains permanent magnet pair 206 disposed between pole tip segment 208 and pole segments 204A-B within IPM rotor 104 assembly. In a non-limiting example, the permanent magnet pair 206 may be made of a neodymium-boron-iron, samarium-cobalt, ferrite, or Alnico and the like.
In one embodiment, pole segments 204A-B and pole tip segment 208 are made of a magnetically conductive material such as ferromagnetic materials with relative a permeability greater than 10 and preferably greater than 100. Examples of magnetically conductive materials include, but are not limited to, carbon steel or steel made of silicon-iron, cobalt-iron, or nickel-iron.
Mechanical members 210, according to one embodiment, are made of material having substantially low magnetic conductivity with relative permeability value in range between 1 and 10 to prevent flux leakages between permanent magnet pair 206. Examples of such a material include, but are not limited to, a 300 series stainless steel, titanium alloys, and austenitic nickel-chromium-based superalloys, such as the alloys commonly associated with the trade name INCONEL registered to Special Metals Corporation (New Hartford, N.Y.). According to one embodiment, the material may be selected such that magnetic permeability of the material is at least 100 times less than magnetic permeability of materials used to make the pole segments and/or pole tip segments. Pole segments 204A-B conduct magnetic flux between rotor poles.
Also, as illustrated in
In the current example implementation, the first mechanical feature is designed as a keyhole slot and the second mechanical feature is designed as a dovetail slot. In alternative embodiments, other types of slots, such as T-shaped slots, circular or oblong keyholes, may also be used to implement the first and the second mechanical features. In various other embodiments, any types of slot may be used to implement the first and the second mechanical features. Correspondingly, mating connectors appropriate for the type of slot may be provided to complement the slot resulting in a mechanical interlock.
IPM rotor 104 may include additional mechanical features and additional mechanical members 220. Additional mechanical features may, for example, be a set of axial grooves. Additional mechanical members 220 may be a set of rivets. In one embodiment, additional mechanical members 220 may be made of a substantively magnetically non-conducting material. As illustrated in
Although IPM rotor 104 is described herein as an assembly of individual components, a person skilled in the art can appreciate that the individual component may be produced as a unit with non-functional linkages. As an example, the functions of the pole segment 204 and shaft 204 can be combined and produced as a single part. Furthermore, the placement of one or more mechanical members 220 may be selected for maximum benefit. As an example, mechanical members 220 can be used at any location within a one-piece pole segment to provide mechanical support without increasing flux leakage.
In the current embodiment, pole segment 304 includes a vee-shaped surface extending axially on an external side, as illustrated in
Pole tip segment 308 mounted on permanent magnet pair 306 is coupled and restrained to pole segment 304 by a mechanical member. In one embodiment, the mechanical member used herein is span bolt 310 with bolt head 316. Span bolt 310 is passed through a third mechanical feature 314 of pole tip segment 308 and pole segment 304 and coupled to pole segment 304. In one embodiment, span bolt 310 may be made of a magnetically non-conductive material. In various embodiments, the mechanical member may be a screw, a bar, a rivet and the like; and pole segment 304 and pole tip segments 308 may include corresponding mechanical features that receive the mechanical member.
Pole segment 304 includes the third mechanical feature to receive span bolt 310. In the current embodiment, the third mechanical feature is a radial hole 314 through the pole segment 304.
Permanent magnet pair 306 is disposed within a geometric arrangement formed by pole segment 304 and pole tip segment 308 as illustrated in
Rotor 300 may further include rivets 320. Rivets 320 provide additional mechanical strength to rotor 300. In one embodiment, rivets 320 may be magnetically non-conductive and electrically isolated from pole tip segment 308. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that other structures such as bolts, screws and the like may be used as additional mechanical members instead of or in addition to rivets to provide the additional mechanical strength.
The example embodiment of
A three dimensional construct of a section of IPM rotor 300 is illustrated in
In this example implementation, support bars 512 are coupled perpendicularly and circumferentially to a support disc 514. Support disc 514 may be disposed axially along the length of rotor 500. Rotor 500 may be provided with additional support members 520 to provide additional support. Additional support members 520 may be substantially similar to additional support member 220 and 320 as illustrated in
Mechanical member 610 restrains permanent magnet pair 606 embedded within pole segment 604. According to the current embodiment, mechanical member 610 is a tie bar extending axially and having dovetail pins on opposite ends. The dovetail pins could be square, rectangular, round and the like. Mechanical member 610 is disposed in a mechanical feature. The mechanical feature may be a groove extending axially. Pole segment 604 includes the mechanical feature to receive mechanical member 610. In the current embodiment, mechanical feature 614 is a tie bar slot designed to receive mechanical element 610. The position of mechanical member 610 and mechanical feature 614 is such that permanent magnet pair 606 is structurally supported within rotor 600 assembly. A person skilled in the art will appreciate other mechanical members that may be used instead of or in addition to tie bar 610 to support the permanent magnet pairs.
In the current embodiment, mechanical element 610 is made of a material having substantially low magnetic conductivity. Examples of such material include, but are not limited to, a 300 series stainless steel, titanium alloys and austenitic nickel-chromium-based superalloys, such as the alloys commonly associated with the trade name INCONEL registered to Special Metals Corporation (New Hartford, N.Y.). Non-magnetic mechanical element 610 located between permanent magnet pair 606 reduces the flux leakage between permanent magnet pair 606.
Any of above mentioned designs may be implemented as a rotor and used in an electrical machine employing a stator. Examples of electrical machine include, but are not limited to a motor and a generator. The present invention has been described in terms of several embodiments solely for the purpose of illustration. Persons skilled in the art will recognize from this description that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but may be practiced with modifications and alterations limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This invention was made with Government support under contract number DE-FC26-07NT43122 awarded by U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6703746 | Biais et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741002 | Nishiyama et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7028386 | Kato et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7327062 | Kaneko | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7425786 | Hino et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7550889 | Horst | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7705503 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7750523 | Nakayama et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20030201685 | Shimada et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060071568 | Kimura et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060119203 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070103024 | Nakayama et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070252468 | Lee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070290566 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080224558 | Ionel | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090102306 | Nishijima | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100127584 | Gottfried | May 2010 | A1 |
20100259123 | Nishijima | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
54075004 | Jun 1979 | JP |
05292691 | Nov 1993 | JP |
7-11859 | Feb 1995 | JP |
09200988 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2005253162 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2004006412 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of foreign document JP 7-11859 U. |
Munehiro Kamiya; Development of Traction Drive Motors for the Toyota Hybrid System; Toyota Motor Corporation, 1, Toyota-cho, Toyota, Aichi, 471-8571 Japan; 8 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130026871 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |