The present application hereby claims priority under 35 U.S.C. ยง119 on German patent application number DE 10230085.2 filed Jun. 27, 2002, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention generally relates to an electrical power breaker with a switching contact arrangement. Preferably, it relates to one which includes a current conductor, carrying a stationary contact member, and a contact lever, carrying a moveable contact member. The contact lever may be arranged on a contact carrier, which can pivot in order to close and open the switching contact arrangement, such that it can move about a pivot bearing. The current conductor and the contact lever may lye opposite one another when the switching contact arrangement is closed, so as to form a current loop which generates a torque acting on the contact lever.
A power breaker has been disclosed, for example, by EP 0 006 637. It is known from this publication that the force produced in a current loop can be used both for increasing and for decreasing the force between the contact members. Both functions are very useful for power breakers and are used in many different ways. An increase in the force between the contact members is desirable if the time at which the switching contact arrangement opens is intended to be entirely dependent on a protection device, for example an electronic overcurrent release. A prerequisite for this so-called selective response is that the contact members remain closed until the current is at its peak, since otherwise premature erosion of the contact members and other severe damage may occur. A current loop allows high-current-density forces, which are produced in particular between the interacting contact members and are equal in value to the square of the current, to be compensated.
In contrast to this, current-limiting power breakers have the characteristic that the contact members are opened directly in the event of a high current even before a protection device responds. This can be achieved or assisted by a current loop of the type mentioned. In combination with the action of an arc-quenching chamber, the electrical resistance of the switching arc formed when the contact members are separated in this case limits the current to a value which is acceptable to the power breaker and the associated switchgear.
The fact that a considerably different construction is required for the switching contact arrangements for increasing or decreasing the contact force adversely affects the cost-effective production of power breakers. Consequently, selective and current-limiting power breakers known to date differ in major structured features.
An embodiment of the invention may be based on an object of eliminating at least one of the limitations described and/or and object of allowing selective and current-limiting power breakers to be produced from essentially identical components.
An object may achieved according to an embodiment of the invention by the fact that sections of the current conductor and the contact lever forming the current loop are designed to be arched and concentric with respect to one another, with a radius which approximately corresponds to the distance from the pivot bearing of the contact lever.
The arched and concentric configuration indicates that the elementary force vectors, which together produce the torque acting on the contact lever, cooperate with the same lever arm. This occurs whilst, when the sections forming the current loop are arranged parallel to one another, each of the force vectors contributes to the torque to a different extent. As a result, when the sections lying opposite one another have the same length and in the case of an arched and concentric arrangement, the force available is utilized considerably more effectively.
The abovementioned effective utilization of the available force is a result of the elementary force vectors being focussed on the center of the arched arrangement. The effective lever arm is in this case the distance of this center from the pivot bearing of the contact lever. By this, it is advantageously possible to generate a torque causing the contact members to either close or open without the arrangement and configuration of the current-carrying sections, lying opposite one another, being changed. This can advantageously be brought about by bearing elements being arranged on the contact carrier and/or on the contact lever, which bearing elements cause the pivot bearing of the contact lever to have two different positions in relation to the lever arm, and hereby produce a torque causing the contact members to either close or open.
The invention is explained in further detail below with reference to the exemplary embodiments shown in the figures, wherein:
A drive apparatus 15, indicated in
The current path of the switching contact arrangement 1 shown in
The curvature of the concentric sections 21 and 22 is chosen such that the radius approximately corresponds to the distance from the pivot bearing 9 of the contact lever 8. However, the arched sections 21 and 22 are aligned such that the center 24 of the curvature does not coincide with the axis of the pivot bearing 9, but with this pivot bearing 9 forms a lever arm 25.
The switching contact arrangement 1 in accordance with
A current flowing through the current conductors 4 and 5 as well as the contact lever 8 and the flexible conductor 14 is caused to change direction due to the formation of a current loop 20 in adjacent sections 21 and 22 of the upper current conductor 4 and the contact lever 8. By this, the current flows anti-parallel in the sections 21 and 22. In a known manner, this produces a repulsive force which is equal in value to the square of the current and is dependent on the ratio of the length of the parallel sections 21 and 22 to the distance between them.
When the power breaker 2 is in normal operation, this force is low and is overcome by the contact force springs 17. Dimensioning the current loop 20, i.e. dimensioning the length of the sections 21 and 22 and their distance from one another. However, causes this force to reach a significant level if a short-circuit current is flowing through the power breaker 2. Owing to the concentric curvatures of the sections 21 and 22, a resultant force 26 acts in the center 24 by a lever arm 25 and causes a torque to be exerted on the contact lever 8, in the direction of an arrow 27. This is so high that the contact members 10 and 12 are separated counter to the force of the contact force springs 17.
The switching contact arrangement 1 is then further caused to open completely by a mechanically forced or electronically controlled release of a latch in the drive apparatus 15 and/or in the drive linkage 16. In the process, an arc-quenching chamber 18, which is shown schematically above the arcing horns 11 and 13, contributes to quenching the switching arc and thus to interrupting the current circuit. These processes are generally known for power breakers and therefore will not be explained in any further detail.
Although the switching contact arrangement 30, shown in
The current path through the switching contact arrangement 30 extends from the upper current conductor 32, via a stationary contact member 36, a moveable contact member 37 which cooperates with said stationary contact member 36, the contact lever 33 and a flexible conductor 38, to the lower current conductor 35. Furthermore, as with the switching contact arrangement 1 according to
The corresponding torque, illustrated by an arrow 47, acts in the counter-clockwise direction and hereby increases the contact force produced between the contact members 36 and 37 by contact force springs 48. By dimensioning the cooperating parts in a suitable manner, a reduction in the contact force, caused by the high-current-density force between the contact members 36 and 37, is compensated, and the switching contact arrangement 30 thus remains closed even at peak currents. The opening of the switching contact arrangement is thus left to a protection device (e.g. digital electronic overcurrent release).
The different functioning of the switching contact arrangements 1 and 30 which has been described is achieved despite them having the same external dimensions and largely similar cooperating parts. This principle is explained below with reference to
In the illustration according to
The desired effect of the torque acting on the contact levers 51, 52, 53 in the clockwise direction or in the counterclockwise direction is achieved by arranging the pivot bearing of the contact levers on the contact carrier 50. The latter has two receptacles for bearing elements (e.g. hinge bolts), of which one receptacle 56 is configured such that it limits the current (
Instead of a common contact lever for both types of power breakers, special contact levers 52 and 53 may be used for current-limiting and contact-force-increasing switching contact arrangements, respectively. These contact levers 52 and 53 each have only one receptacle 60 and 61, respectively, which cooperate, corresponding to the dashed-dotted lines, with the receptacle 56 and 57, respectively, on the contact carrier 52.
If, in the above description of exemplary embodiments, in each case a switching contact arrangement and a contact lever are referred to, this is to be understood as meaning that, in a known manner, a power breaker can be designed to be multipoled (three- or four-poled) and that each of the switching contact arrangements may contain a plurality of parallel contact levers (multicontact system). The pivot bearing of the contact levers is in this case formed, as the common bearing element, by a bearing bolt of corresponding length which passes through the receptacles of all the contact levers and the common contact carrier.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 30 085 | Jun 2002 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4849590 | Becker et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4853662 | Kandatsu | Aug 1989 | A |
6184761 | Doma et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
20020050878 | Ferree et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030052758 | Raabe et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0006637 | Jul 1979 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040001297 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |