Electrically-actuated variable transmission film having very low haze and a visible grid in a clear state

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11520210
  • Patent Number
    11,520,210
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 28, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 6, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A light attenuator that provides transparent light states and absorbing dark states for use in selectively controlling light, especially for smart glass applications. The light attenuator includes abutting areas of attenuation and transparency that form a repeat pattern or a quasi-repeat pattern. The attenuating areas are visible when the light attenuator is in the light state, but the repeat pattern is sufficiently large that a viewer looks through the attenuator and sees no haze.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to Great Britain Patent Application No. 1914105.0, filed Sep. 30, 2019 and to Great Britain Patent Application No. 1914933.5, filed Oct. 16, 2019. All references, patents, and patent applications disclosed herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.


The present invention relates to an electrophoretic device having a construction that provides transparent light states for use in selectively controlling light, especially for smart glass applications.


BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

There is a need for an electrically switchable, electrophoretic device that in one or more light states is transparent to visible light and provides glass-like quality and in other light states strongly attenuates light. Glass-like quality includes providing very good clarity and light transmission, very low haze, minimal perception of hue in the transparent state, and minimal diffraction. In the prior art, the available electrophoretic solutions have limitations on their functionality in some cases and inherent technological obstacles in others.


In the applicant's EP2976676 the size of apertures (transparent areas) and obstructions (light blocking areas) have their maximum size and pitch determined by the resolution of a typical viewer's eye such that apertures and obstructions are sufficiently small that their geometric form in a face view is not apparent. In examples in the document of its transparent state its black charged particles are concentrated and surround discrete transparent apertures, the maximum angle subtended by an aperture to a viewer at a required viewing distance is one arcminute (corresponding to 290 microns at a viewing distance of 1 meter) and preferably 0.6 arcminutes (corresponding to 174.5 microns at 1 meter). The subtended angle of the aperture pitch (i.e. aperture and concentrated charged particle area) can be double these limits, but only to the extent that the geometric forms are not apparent on a face view.


Similarly, in the applicant's EP3281055 it is stated that the device (including smart windows) has solid polymer structures embedded in its viewing area and the structures are on the scale of microstructure and are invisible to the eye. An example is given of a smart glass device with a cavity pitch of 250 microns. If viewing only from a long distance the document allows the cavities to be up to 1,000 microns in theory, however, the document constrains the microstructures to be not visible in use. The limiting constraint is similar to the earlier EP2976676 and is stated as the maximum angle subtended by a micro-fastener portion to a viewer at a required viewing distance is one arc minute and preferably 0.6 arc minutes.


In U.S. Pat. No. 8,183,757 it is stated that when the colorant particles are collected in the reservoir regions, the colorant particles may tint the visible areas. The tint caused by the colorant particles may prevent a neutral white or clear optical state for the displays. Devices used an opaque layer on the second electrode within each recess region. The black opaque layer in the recesses (or reservoirs) masks the coloured collected particles. In related U.S. Pat. No. 8,384,659 a hexagonal reservoir is shown in FIG. 2E and its radius is 67.5 microns.


In the transparent light states of prior art devices there is a perceivable tint corresponding to the colour of the charged particles in the electrophoretic ink. A viewer's perception of tint, including black tint, is one of a uniform tinting due to the micron scale, discrete distribution, and dense distribution of apertures or obstructions analogous to halftone print on paper or colour displays. The latter's pixel density is sufficiently high to ensure that individual pixels cannot be resolved even when viewed up close and that the light from adjacent pixels is integrated by the eye of a viewer seamlessly.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In embodiments a light attenuator (200, 203, 204) comprising a cell (300, 303, 304) having a first transparent substrate (190) and a second transparent substrate (190) defining respective viewing faces (150, 153, 154) and with opposite major surfaces (i.e. juxtaposed parallel) having transparent electrodes (160) and spaced apart (by dimension 5) to provide a volume there between, said volume containing transparent polymer structure (100, 103, 104) and electrophoretic ink (1, 2, 3), said ink comprising charged particles (10, 11, 12) dispersed in a transparent fluid (15, 16, 17), said charged particles are responsive to an electric field applied to said electrodes to move between: a first extreme light state in which particles are maximally spread within said cell to lie in the path of sunlight through the cell attenuating the sunlight and a second extreme light state in which said particles are maximally concentrated within the cell in locations (130, 133, 134) defined by said polymer structure to remove them from the path of sunlight through the cell transmitting the sunlight and providing visual access, and in said second light state a viewing face of said light attenuator has a visible pattern of attenuating areas (20, 24) abutted on transparent areas (30, 34) defined by the presence and absence respectively of said concentrated particles, wherein each of said abutted areas has a dimension (50, 55, 60, 65) that is 0.3 mm or more, and the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent attenuating areas (40, 41) or the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent transparent areas (45, 46) is 0.6 mm or more.


Each of said areas in said pattern subtends an angle (80, 90) of more than two arc minutes at a distance of 0.5M from said viewing face (150) and a pair of said abutted areas subtend more than four arc minutes (70).


In some embodiments the pattern is a repeating pattern and said centre-to-centre distances are the same as the pitch. The repeating pattern is a switchable grid that is visible in said second light state and indistinguishable in said first light state. In some embodiments the shortest distance or width (61) of said transparent areas is 75% or more of said pitch and the shortest distance (51) of the attenuating areas is 25% or less. Preferably the limits for the preceding rule are 80% and 20% respectively and more preferably 85% and 15%.


The transparent area in said face view of an embodiment is 60% or more of the total active (i.e., switchable) area, preferably 62% or more, more preferably 65% or more, and most preferably 70% or more, and said visible pattern comprises discontiguous and/or contiguous areas and is perceivable as a pattern of attenuating areas. The visible pattern is superposed on said visual access. The colour of the pattern or grid is the colour of said charged particles. Preferably, the superposed visible pattern or grid is designed to be aesthetically acceptable (or pleasing) by selecting the design of the locations of said concentrated charged particles in said polymer structure.


One of said areas is either: monodisperse or has a distribution of sizes and/or shapes, and preferably the shape of said areas is selected to minimize the opportunities for moiré patterns in said visual access and includes selecting shapes whose borders are defined by applying a modulation function to a geometric shape.


In some embodiments the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent attenuating areas and the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent transparent areas is 0.6 mm or more.


In some embodiments the centre-to-centre distance is in order of preference: 0.62 mm or more, 0.65 mm or more, 0.7 mm or more, 0.8 mm or more, 1.0 mm or more, and most preferably 1.25 mm or more. In correspondence to the preceding, the abutting attenuating areas and transparent areas each have one or more dimensions that are in order of preference: 0.31 mm or more, 0.325 mm or more, 0.35 mm or more, 0.4 mm or more, 0.5 mm or more, and most preferably 0.625 mm or more.


The charged particles have colourant including one or more of: a dye colorant, a pigment colourant, a strongly light scattering material, a strongly reflecting material, or a strongly absorbing material, and particles can be any colour including black or white.


The polymer structure spaces apart said substrates and divides said volume into a monolayer of discrete cavities having polymer walls and filled with said electrophoretic ink, and preferably said polymer structure includes a sealing layer sealing the ink within the cavities.


In some embodiments a colour layer is selectively applied to said polymer walls so that in said viewing face the colour of the wall area matches the colour of said charged particles.


In embodiments the locations of said concentrated charged particles are at said polymer walls, or the locations of said concentrated charged particles are in discrete reservoirs in said polymer structure and the locations do not coincide with said walls, or the locations of said concentrated charged particles are in depressions or channels between protrusions in said polymer structure and the locations may or may not coincide with said walls.


The electrophoretic ink has two or more charged particle types including: positively charged, negatively charged, differing electrophoretic mobility, and/or different colours.


The electrophoretic ink has two charged particles types each with an electrophoretic mobility and colour different to the other but the same charge polarity, and in the second light state said two types segregate as they concentrate at said locations with one type masking the other with respect to one of said viewing faces.


Preferably light attenuators provide at least one light state intermediate the first and second states by moving the charged particles between the concentrating locations in the polymer structure and the opposite electrode to vary the degree of concentrating or spreading respectively.


A device including one of: a window, a mirror, a light shutter, a light modulator, a variable light transmittance sheet, a variable light absorptance sheet, a variable light reflectance sheet, an electrophoretic sun visor for a vehicle, or a see-through display, incorporating the light attenuator.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1a shows embodiment 200 in a first light state. The drawing shows a view of its face.



FIG. 1b shows embodiment 200 in a second light state and is three-dimensional view of its face.



FIG. 1c shows polymer structure 100 and is a three-dimensional view of its face.



FIG. 2a shows embodiment 200 in a second light state and is a face view.



FIG. 2b shows embodiment 200 in a second light state and is a face view.



FIG. 3 shows embodiment 203 in a second light state and is a cross sectional view.



FIG. 4 shows embodiment 204 in a second light state and is a face view.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments achieve improved optical quality in its electrophoretic light attenuators by making its particles visible as a pattern, or grid-like structure, or array, in its transparent light state. In this state the coloured charged particles are concentrated in defined areas by a transparent polymer structure so that areas in between transmit light. In the prior art neither the concentrated particle areas nor the transparent areas were resolvable, but, in embodiments both areas can be resolved as distinct by eye from at least 1M away. Embodiments minimize the integration of both areas by a viewer so that the scene viewed through the attenuator is significantly less tainted with the colour of, or haze from, the charged particles. A viewer's perception of the face of an embodiment is of clear glass with a coloured grid (or array) structure. The latter can be selected to be aesthetically pleasing. Furthermore, by selecting the scale of the pattern or grid-like structure (or array) to be visible, a light attenuator made with white particles does not appear to be hazy, rather, it appears as a foreground white grid superposed on the background scene. In addition, diffraction of light is greatly reduced by using a visible scale for the design of the transparent light state.


Embodiments are described with reference to the drawings. In FIGS. 1a to 1c and FIGS. 2a and 2b different features of the same light attenuator (200) are shown in face views. FIG. 1a shown the strongly light attenuating first light state, and FIGS. 1b, 2a and 2b show the transparent second light state. FIG. 1c shows the polymer structure of embodiment (200). FIG. 3 shows embodiment (203) in cross section and is similar to embodiment (200). In these embodiments the second light state results from the electrophoretic ink's charged particles (10, 11) being concentrated in channels (130, 133) between protrusions (110, 113) in the polymer structure (100, 103) by an applied electrical field. FIG. 4 shows the face view of an alternative embodiment (204) that has a different layout of its polymer structure (104) such that its charged particles (12) move across the polymer surface (117) to concentrate in discrete reservoirs or pits (134) in the second light state.


In the figures the light attenuators (200, 203, 204) of embodiments comprise an electrophoretic cell (300, 303, 304) that has two transparent substrates (190) with each coated on one side with a transparent electrode (160). The electrodes' major surfaces face each other and are juxtaposed parallel as shown in FIG. 3. The opposite surfaces of the substrates form the viewing faces (150, 153, 154) of the cells. The substrates are spaced apart and the volume between them is the electro-optical layer of the device. The dimension indicating the spacing apart is (5) and is shown in FIG. 3. In some embodiments dimension (5) defines the cell gap. The electro-optical layer (or volume) comprises transparent polymer structure (100, 103, 104) and electrophoretic ink (1, 2, 3). The electrophoretic ink comprises charged particles (10, 11, 12) dispersed in an otherwise transparent fluid (15, 16, 17). The charged particles can be any colour including black (11), white (12) or red (13). The particles respond to an electric field applied to the electrodes to move between light states bounded by two extremes. In the first extreme light state, shown in FIG. 1a, particles are maximally spread within the cell to lie in the path of sunlight through the cell so that the sunlight is attenuated and the viewing faces are the colour of the particles. The first extreme light state corresponds to a spread state or maximum attenuating or obscuring or hiding state.


In the second extreme light state (shown in FIGS. 1b, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4) the particles are maximally concentrated within the cell in locations (130, 133, 134) defined by the polymer structure (100, 103, 104). FIG. 1c shows a three-dimensional view of the polymer structure (100). Channel (130) forms an interconnected depression or space between discrete protrusions (110) to confine concentrated particles (10) in the second light state. Concentrated particles can fill the channel up to the level indicated by (115). This removes the particles from the path of sunlight through the cell so that the sunlight is transmitted without a colour hue (i.e., transmitted without encountering coloured particles) and the cell is see-through providing visual access through an opening incorporating the embodiment.


The second light state of cell (303) shown in FIG. 3 shows light ray (1200) from an outside environment passing through a protrusion (113) (shown hatched) corresponding to a transparent area and emerging from the cell as ray (1201) to illuminate an inside environment. Light incident on a concentrated particle area is diffusely reflected by white particles (11) in channel (133) in embodiment (203) as shown by incident and reflected rays (1205) and (1206) respectively. In cell (300) shown in FIG. 2a light incident on the concentrated particle area (20) is strongly absorbed by black charged particles (10). In cell (304) shown in FIG. 4 light incident on concentrated particle area (24) is both absorbed and diffusely reflected in the visible spectrum by red charged particles (12). Regardless of the colour of charged particles, light incident on the concentrated particle area is not significantly transmitted and so this area is described herein as attenuating.



FIG. 1b shows that in the second extreme light state the viewing face (150) of the light attenuator has a visible pattern of attenuating areas (20) abutting on (i.e. side-by-side with or juxtaposing) transparent areas (30) defined by the presence or absence respectively of the concentrated particles that in turn are defined by the polymer structure's channel (130) and protrusions (110) (the latter two are shown in FIG. 1c).


In FIG. 2a these attenuating (20) and transparent (30) abutting areas are arranged so that each area has one or more dimensions that are 0.3 mm or more (see (50) and (60)) and therefore visible or discernible or resolvable as parts (or elements) by eye. In addition, the centre-to-centre distance (40) of adjacent attenuating areas or the centre-to-centre distance (45) of adjacent transparent areas is 0.6 mm or more. The viewing face (150) has a plurality of abutting areas and centre-to-centre distances and they form a visible pattern across its area.


Similarly, in FIG. 4 the attenuating (24) and transparent (34) abutting areas are arranged so that each area has one or more dimensions that are 0.3 mm or more (see (55) and (65)) and therefore visible by eye. In addition, the centre-to-centre distance (41) of adjacent attenuating areas or the centre-to-centre distance (46) of adjacent transparent areas is 0.6 mm or more. The viewing face (154) has a plurality of abutting areas and centre-to-centre distances and they form a visible pattern across its area.


The 0.6 mm centre-to-centre dimension is sufficiently large to be visible at 1.0M by a viewer with a visual acuity of 1.0 or higher as the viewing distance results in an angular resolution of two minutes of arc. The pattern is visible because the attenuating areas corresponding to the concentrated particles in the second light state form resolvable parts (or features) when they have a centre-to-centre distance of 0.6 mm or more and transparent area in the space between adjacent attenuating areas. A visual analogy can be made with the graduation pattern on a steel rule; graduations having a centre-to-centre distance of 0.5 mm (i.e. 0.5 mm divisions) are visible.


While the dimensions of each area of attenuating (20) and transparent (30) abutting areas should be at least 0.3 mm or more to be discernible to a viewer at 1.0M, and have a centre-to-centre dimension of at least 0.6 mm, it is also necessary that the dimension of the each area of attenuating (20) and transparent (30) abutting areas should not be so large that the pigment loading of the transparent area cannot be packed into the attenuating area. This is because, in most configurations, the area above the transparent area increases as the square of the dimension, while the surface area of the attenuating area, where the particles will be packed, increases roughly linearly with the dimension. If the dimension grows too big, the particles cannot be effective packed in the attenuating area, leading to a darker clear state. Larger dimensions are also found to require higher voltages to achieve good clearing. Experience with various sized of dimensions suggests that the area of attenuating (20) and transparent (30) abutting areas should not exceed 3 cm. The corresponding maximum centre-to-centre dimension is about 6 cm. Thus, each repeat of attenuating (20) and transparent (30) abutting areas should have a dimension (50, 55 and 60, 65) between 0.3 mm and 3 cm, while the centre-to-centre distance (40, 41) of adjacent attenuating areas or the centre-to-centre distance (45, 46) of adjacent transparent areas is between 0.6 mm and 6 cm.


In embodiments, in the second light state, and for a plurality of instances, the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent attenuating areas, or the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent transparent areas is in order of preference: 0.62 mm to 5.8 cms, 0.65 mm to 5.5 cms, 0.7 mm to 5.14 cms, 0.8 mm to 4.5 cms, 1.0 mm to 3.6 cms, and most preferably 1.25 mm to 3 cms, and in correspondence to the preceding, the abutting attenuating areas and transparent areas each have one or more dimensions that are in order of preference: 0.31 mm to 2.9 cms, 0.325 mm to 2.75 cms, 0.35 mm to 2.57 cms, 0.4 mm to 2.25 cms, 0.5 mm to 1.8 cms, and most preferably 0.625 mm to 1.5 cms.


In embodiments the transparent area in the face view is 60% or more of the total active (i.e., switchable) area, preferably 62% or more, more preferably 65% or more, and most preferably 70% or more. The attenuating area is the remainder in each case. The transparent areas, the attenuating areas, and accordingly the resolvable parts and pattern in the second light state, are defined by a device's polymer structure.


In an example shown in FIG. 2b, a vehicle is fitted with embodiments for its side windows and sunroof. The charged particles (10) are not drawn but the corresponding attenuating area (20) is shown. Occupants of the vehicle would typically have a viewing distance of 0.5M (or less) through these openings in the second light state. The angle subtended by an attenuating area (20) is indicated by (80) and the angle for transparent area (30) by the number (90). An abutted attenuating area (20) and transparent area (30) is shown subtending an angle (70). At 0.5M viewing distance this abutted area pair of (20)+(30) subtends over 4.1 minutes of arc or 4.1 times the minimum angular resolution of a viewer with a visual acuity of 1.0 when the distance (edge-to-edge) of the abutted areas is 0.6 mm or more. The angle was calculated as:










Angle





subtended

=

Tangent






(

0.6


/


500

)








=

0.0012






(

in





radians

)








=

4.125






(

in





arc





minutes

)









The corresponding calculation for subtended angles (80) and (90) at the minimum 0.3 mm dimension within the visible pattern in embodiments is 2.06 minutes of arc:










Angle





subtended

=

Tangent






(

0.3


/


500

)








=

0.0006






(

in





radians

)








=

2.063






(

in





arc





minutes

)









As a consequence of the subtended angles for (70), (80) and (90) being a multiple of the minimum resolution of a viewer (with acuity 1.0) there is an obvious visible pattern when viewing embodiment (200) at 0.5M. Attenuating area (20) (comprising black concentrated particles (10)) can be seen as a black grid (or array) with clear openings analogous with a metal mesh having comparable openings and walls. Objects viewed through the embodiment have a negligible perception of black hue because the viewer's eye does not integrate the black grid area with the view through the transparent areas.


By contrast, the motivation of the prior art electrophoretic, light attenuator devices that have polymer structure throughout their electro-optical layers is to arrange their structures so that the structures (or associated patterns in the light states defined by the structures) are sufficiently small that they cannot be perceived by a viewer. In the applicant's EP2976676, the size of apertures (transparent areas) and obstructions (light blocking areas) have their maximum size and pitch (analogous to the repeating centre-to-centre distance) determined by the resolution of a typical viewer's eye so that at a viewing distance of 0.5M, its areas subtend an angle of less than one arc minute and this equates to less than 0.145 mm to avoid a pattern being apparent to a viewer.


In embodiments, in the second light state, the centre-to-centre distance of attenuating areas or transparent areas (defined by the presence or absence respectively of the concentrated particles that in turn are defined by the polymer structure) can be random or have more than one value. In other embodiments the centre-to-centre distances repeat uniformly in a direction and are the same as the pitch of the repeating pattern that is visible by eye.



FIG. 2a shows the pitch (1040) of abutting attenuating and transparent areas in the top-to-bottom direction. It is longer than the pitch (1041) in the left-to-right direction. In embodiment (200) the shortest distance or width (61) of the transparent areas can be 75% or more of the pitch (1041) and the shortest distance (51) of the attenuating areas can be 25% or less. Preferably the limits for the preceding rule are 80% and 20% respectively and more preferably 85% and 15%. FIG. 4 shows the pitch (1045) of abutting attenuating and transparent areas for alternative embodiment (204).


In embodiment (200) the transparent areas (30) are discrete and the attenuating area (20) is contiguous, see FIG. 2a. The reverse relationship is shown by embodiment (204) in FIG. 4: the attenuating areas (24) are discrete and the transparent area (34) is contiguous. In both embodiments the centre-to-centre distance of adjacent discrete areas is easily identified (see (45) and (41) respectively). The corresponding centre-to-centre distance for the contiguous area relates to the area between the discrete areas as shown by dimension (40) in FIG. 2a and dimension (46) in FIG. 4. In this regard embodiments can be defined by a centre-to-centre distance for both its attenuating areas and its transparent areas.


In the second light state the visible pattern formed by the attenuating and transparent areas in a face of embodiments is superposed on the view through the face. The visible pattern is in the foreground and the view is in the background. The eye resolves the visible pattern as a grid (or array) and perceives it as a grid of opaque areas that are the colour of the particles. In embodiments this grid can be made indistinguishable on the face when switched to the first light state. The charged particles in the first light state spread uniformly and opposite the locations that receive the particles as they concentrate in the second light state. Preferably, the superposed visible pattern or grid (or array) is designed to be aesthetically acceptable (or pleasing) by selecting the design of the locations of the concentrated charged particles in the polymer structure.


An embodiment's polymer structure, including the locations of the concentrated charged particles, is formed at least in part in an embossing, moulding or replicating step. Examples of moulding techniques are described in the applicant's EP2976676 titled “An Electrophoretic Device Having a Transparent Light State”. To minimize haze in embodiments the refractive index of the polymer structure (100, 103, 104) is matched to the ink's suspending fluid (15, 16, 17), preferably to within 0.005, more preferably, 0.002, and most preferably, 0.001.


The replicated polymer structure has depressions, channels, pits, recesses, or reservoirs corresponding to the attenuating areas and protrusions, funnel-like sloping surfaces, or a raised surface in between corresponding with the transparent areas. The shape of both areas in a face view as well as the centre-to-centre distance is defined by the polymer structure. Either area type (i.e., attenuating or transparent) can be monodisperse or have a distribution of sizes and/or shapes. Examples of devices having channels and protrusions can be found in the applicant's EP2976676; devices having reservoirs and funnel-like sloping surfaces in HP's U.S. Pat. No. 8,184,357; and, devices having recesses and raised surfaces in HP's U.S. Pat. No. 7,957,054. The latter refers to a dielectric layer with recesses but the dielectric layer is a polymer structure and its concentrated particles are located at recesses (or pits, voids, or holes) in the layer in its transparent light state. In an alternative embodiment the polymer structure provides walls that charged particles concentrate against in the second light state. These devices are referred to as dielectrophoretic and an example is shown in E Ink's US2018/0364542 A1.


In some embodiments the shape of areas is selected to minimize the opportunities for moiré patterns that would otherwise occur if an embodiment's opaque grid (i.e., strongly attenuating areas arranged in an array) is overlaid on a similar pattern in the background viewed through a face. To avoid or minimize moiré patterns the attenuating areas preferably avoid a pattern of continuous parallel lines. In this regard a honeycomb structure as shown in FIG. 2a is preferred as it is less likely to be similar to grid structures encountered in a background scene. But in more preferred embodiments a modulation function is applied to a geometric shape. For example, the polymer structure (110) shown in FIG. 1c in an alternative embodiment has the border of its hexagonal shaped protrusions (110) modulated with a Sine wave to have wave-like sides instead of flats. The visible pattern of this alternative embodiment is characterized by wave-like segments instead of straight segments and so less likely to cause moiré patterns when viewing a scene.


In some embodiments two or more devices are stacked and to avoid moiré patterns each device has a different grid (or array) pattern. In an embodiment example, a sunvisor in a vehicle comprises a stack of two devices to achieve very low light transmittance when both devices are operated in their respective maximum attenuating light states. The embodiment achieves a corresponding maximum light transmitting state when both devices are in their light transmitting states. To avoid moiré patterns in some embodiments both devices' attenuating areas (and transparent areas) are precisely aligned, but, in preferred embodiments the shape of light attenuating areas is selected to be different between devices. For example, one device has a honeycomb structure for its attenuating area and the other device has a monodisperse shape such as spherical, or one whose border is modulated by a Sine wave.


In embodiment (203) shown in FIG. 3 the polymer structure (103) spaces apart the light attenuator's substrates using integrated posts (123). The posts (123) define the cell gap and the orthogonal distance between the substrates is shown as dimension (5). The cell is sealed all around with a polymer seal (not shown). Post (120) on polymer structure (100) shown in FIG. 1c has a similar function. In other embodiments the polymer structure uses polymer walls to space apart the light attenuator's substrates and divide the volume there between into a monolayer of discrete cavities filled with an electrophoretic ink. The walls in this case define the cell gap.


In embodiments the cell gap (dimension (5) in FIG. 3) is from 7.5 microns to 300 microns, preferably from 13.5 microns to 200 microns, more preferably from 16.5 microns to 150 microns, and most preferably from 18 microns to 125 microns.


Preferably, a colour layer is selectively applied to the tops of polymer walls and/or posts so that in a viewing face the colour of the wall area matches the colour and light transmission of the attenuating areas in the second light state. Preferably the polymer structure includes a sealing layer or sealing mechanism that seals the fluid within each cavity. The seal layer preferably bonds to the colour layer on the polymer walls (or incorporates the colour layer). In some embodiments sealed cavities are independent of one another and can be described as cells, and the light attenuator as comprising a monolayer of cells.


In some embodiments the polymer structure locates the concentrated charged particles against or by its polymer walls including in channels adjacent its walls in the second light state. In such embodiments there are concentrated particles on each side of a polymer wall section for the respective cavities each side. Preferably the polymer walls have an attenuating layer and are coloured to match the particles; then the attenuating area for the concentrated particles will appear contiguous on a face of the device and the transparent areas will be discrete. Optionally, the polymer walls can be transparent, and if so are preferably as narrow as possible and preferably the width is in the range: 15 microns to 75 microns. In the latter case the attenuating areas in the second light state are discontiguous.


In other embodiments the polymer structure locates the concentrated charged particles in discrete reservoirs that do not coincide with the walls in the second light state. The attenuating areas are discrete and surrounded by contiguous transparent area. Preferably the walls are as narrow as possible and remain transparent so that the attenuating area in the second light state appears contiguous. Alternatively, the walls may have a colour layer.


In more preferred embodiments the concentrated charged particles are in depressions or channels between protrusions in the polymer structure and the locations may or may not coincide with the walls. The transparent areas are discrete and the attenuating areas are contiguous. Preferably the walls have an attenuating layer in embodiments where they coincide with locations of the concentrated particles, or, are transparent where they do not.


Cavities can contain a single transparent area and a single attenuating area or a plurality of either, or a part of either. Cavities can be uniform and repeat with a pitch or have differences. The centre-to-centre distance between adjacent cavities can be greater than, equal to, or less than, the centre-to-centre distance of transparent or attenuating areas defined by the concentrated charged particles in the second light state. The polymer walls of cavities can also form a visible grid on a face of embodiments but this grid is not switchable. It will be appreciated that it is advantageous to have polymer walls that have an attenuating layer arranged adjacent the locations of concentrated particles where possible. Alternatively, it is advantageous to have transparent walls arranged predominantly in transparent areas of the second light state.


In some cells a colour mask (i.e., a colour layer) different to the colour of the charged particles is selectively applied to a surface of the polymer structure in the locations where particles are concentrated in the second light state (i.e. the attenuating areas). The colour mask areas correspond to the attenuating areas and consequently in embodiments form a visible pattern or grid. In the viewing face on the same side as the colour mask the colour of the locations masks the colour of the concentrated charged particles in the second light state. An embodiment having white charged particles can avoid diffuse reflection from its attenuating areas (i.e. the concentrated charged particles areas) in the second light state by masking these areas with a black mask printed on the polymer structure, or on a face of the substrate on the same side. Alternatively the colour mask could be applied to the opposing area on the polymer structure or the opposite substrate to mask from the other viewing face. Similarly, both sides can be selectively printed to mask or minimize diffuse reflection or transmission from the concentrated particle area in the second light state. The colour mask is defined in embodiments by the locations (130, 133, 134) in the polymer structure (100, 103, 104) that define the concentrated charged particles (10, 11) in the second light state and consequently is visible by eye when viewed from the face it is adjacent to.


In embodiments the electrophoretic ink can have one, two, or more types of charged particles including: positively charged, negatively charged, differing electrophoretic mobility, and/or different colours, or any combination of these. The charged particles have colourant including one or more of: a dye colorant, a pigment colourant, a strongly light scattering material, a strongly reflecting material, or a strongly absorbing material. In some embodiments the electrophoretic ink has two charged particles types, each with an electrophoretic mobility and colour different to the other but the same charge polarity. In the second light state the two types segregate as they concentrate at the locations in the polymer structure with one type masking the other with respect to the viewing faces on the same side. This is an alternative to applying a colour mask to the locations as described in the previous paragraph. A minority of black charged particles with higher electrophoretic mobility can be used to mask a different colour of charged particle such as a majority of white particles having a lower electrophoretic mobility.


Preferably light attenuators provide at least one light state intermediate the first and second states by moving the charged particles between the concentrating locations in the polymer structure and the opposite electrode to vary the degree of concentrating or spreading respectively. A visible pattern will be apparent in intermediate light states once particles begin to concentrate in the locations provided. In embodiments where the charged particles are a colour other than black (e.g., white) haze will be at a minimum in the second light state and increase the closer an intermediate light state is to the first light state. In some embodiments the first light state is very strongly hazy to provide a privacy function.

Claims
  • 1. A light attenuator (200, 203, 204) comprising a cell (300, 303, 304) having a first transparent substrate (190) and a second transparent substrate (190) defining respective viewing faces (150, 153, 154) and with opposite major surfaces having transparent electrodes (160) and spaced apart (5) to provide a volume there between, said volume containing a transparent polymer structure (100, 103, 104) and electrophoretic ink (1, 2, 3), said electrophoretic ink comprising charged particles (10, 11, 12) dispersed in a transparent fluid (15, 16, 17), wherein said charged particles are responsive to an electric field applied to said electrodes and move between: a first extreme light state in which said charged particles are maximally spread within said cell to lie in a path of sunlight through the cell, thereby attenuating the sunlight, and a second extreme light state in which said charged particles are maximally concentrated within the cell in locations (130, 133, 134) defined by said polymer structure thereby removing said charged particles from the path of sunlight through the cell, transmitting the sunlight, and providing visual access,wherein in said second light state, a viewing face of said light attenuator has a visible pattern of attenuating areas (20, 24) abutting on transparent areas (30, 34) defined by a presence and an absence, respectively, of concentrated charged particles, andwherein a repeating unit of said visible pattern consists of an attenuating area and a transparent area, and wherein said repeating unit has a dimension (50, 55 and 60, 65) between 0.3 mm and 3 cm, while a centre-to-centre distance (40, 41) of adjacent attenuating areas or a centre-to-centre distance (45, 46) of adjacent transparent areas is between 0.6 mm and 6 cm.
  • 2. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said areas in said visible pattern subtends an angle (80, 90) of more than two arc minutes at a distance of 0.5M from said viewing face and said abutted areas subtend an angle (70) of more than four arc minutes.
  • 3. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the visible pattern is a repeating pattern, and said centre-to-centre distances (40, 45) are the same as a pitch (1041).
  • 4. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 3, wherein said repeating pattern is a switchable grid that is visible in said second light state and indistinguishable in said first light state, and the switchable grid is a colour of said charged particles.
  • 5. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 3, wherein the centre-to-centre distance of said transparent areas (61) is 75% or more of said pitch (1041) and the centre-to-centre distance of the attenuating areas (51) is 25% or less.
  • 6. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the transparent area in a face view is 60% or more of a total active (i.e., switchable) area in the face view, preferably 62% or more, more preferably 65% or more, and most preferably 70% or more, and said visible pattern is perceivable as a pattern of attenuating areas.
  • 7. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 6, wherein the visible pattern is superposed on said visual access.
  • 8. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein a shape of said attenuating and transparent areas is selected to minimize moiré patterns.
  • 9. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein said centre-to-centre distance of adjacent attenuating areas and said centre-to-centre distance of adjacent transparent areas is 0.6 mm or more.
  • 10. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the centre-to-centre distance of the adjacent attenuating areas and the centre-to-centre distance of the adjacent transparent areas is in order of preference: 0.62 mm to 5.8 cms, 0.65 mm to 5.5 cms, 0.7 mm to 5.14 cms, 0.8 mm to 4.5 cms, 1.0 mm to 3.6 cms, and most preferably 1.25 mm to 3 cms, and wherein the abutting attenuating areas and transparent areas each have one or more dimensions that are in order of preference: 0.31 mm to 2.9 cms, 0.325 mm to 2.75 cms, 0.35 mm to 2.57 cms, 0.4 mm to 2.25 cms, 0.5 mm to 1.8 cms, and most preferably 0.625 mm to 1.5 cms.
  • 11. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polymer structure spaces apart said first and second substrates and divides said volume into a monolayer of discrete cavities having polymer walls and filled with said electrophoretic ink, and preferably said polymer structure includes a sealing layer sealing the ink within the cavities.
  • 12. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 11, wherein a colour layer is selectively applied to said polymer walls so that in said viewing face a colour of the polymer walls match a colour of said attenuating areas.
  • 13. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 11, wherein said locations of said concentrated charged particles are at said polymer walls.
  • 14. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 11, wherein said locations of said concentrated charged particles are in discrete reservoirs in said polymer structure and the locations do not coincide with said polymer walls.
  • 15. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 11, wherein said locations of said concentrated charged particles are in depressions or channels between protrusions in said polymer structure and the locations may or may not coincide with said polymer walls.
  • 16. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein a colour mask is selectively applied to a surface of said substrates or electrodes defined by said locations, and in said viewing face on a same side as the colour mask, a colour of the locations is different from a colour of said charged particles, and wherein the colour mask masks said concentrated charged particles in said second light state and forms areas corresponding to said attenuating areas.
  • 17. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein said electrophoretic ink has two or more charged particle types selected from the group including: positively charged, negatively charged, differing electrophoretic mobility, and different colours.
  • 18. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 17, wherein said electrophoretic ink has two charged particles types each having a different electrophoretic mobility and a different colour from each other, but the two charged particle types have a same charge polarity, wherein in the second light state, said two charged particle types segregate as they concentrate at said locations with one charged particle type masking the other with respect to one of said viewing faces.
  • 19. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1 wherein said charged particles move between said first and second light states to provide at least one light state intermediate said first and second light states.
  • 20. A light attenuator as claimed in claim 1, wherein an embodiment includes one of: a window, a mirror, a light shutter, a light modulator, a variable light transmittance sheet, a variable light absorbance sheet, a variable light reflectance sheet, an electrophoretic sun visor for a vehicle, or a see-through display, incorporating the light attenuator.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
1914105 Sep 2019 GB national
1914933 Oct 2019 GB national
US Referenced Citations (226)
Number Name Date Kind
4418346 Batchelder Nov 1983 A
5115346 Lynam May 1992 A
5784136 Ando et al. Jul 1998 A
5872552 Gordon, II et al. Feb 1999 A
5930026 Jacobson et al. Jul 1999 A
5961804 Jacobson et al. Oct 1999 A
6017584 Albert et al. Jan 2000 A
6067185 Albert et al. May 2000 A
6120588 Jacobson Sep 2000 A
6120839 Comiskey et al. Sep 2000 A
6130774 Albert et al. Oct 2000 A
6144361 Gordon, II et al. Nov 2000 A
6172798 Albert et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184856 Gordon, II et al. Feb 2001 B1
6225971 Gordon, II et al. May 2001 B1
6241921 Jacobson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249271 Albert et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262706 Albert et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262833 Loxley et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271823 Gordon, II et al. Aug 2001 B1
6300932 Albert Oct 2001 B1
6323989 Jacobson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327072 Comiskey et al. Dec 2001 B1
6377387 Duthaler et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392785 Albert et al. May 2002 B1
6392786 Albert May 2002 B1
6459418 Comiskey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6515649 Albert et al. Feb 2003 B1
6538801 Jacobson et al. Mar 2003 B2
6580545 Morrison et al. Jun 2003 B2
6623662 Wang et al. Sep 2003 B2
6639580 Kishi Oct 2003 B1
6652075 Jacobson Nov 2003 B2
6693620 Herb et al. Feb 2004 B1
6721083 Jacobson et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727881 Albert et al. Apr 2004 B1
6822782 Honeyman Nov 2004 B2
6831771 Ho et al. Dec 2004 B2
6839158 Albert et al. Jan 2005 B2
6866760 Paolini, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870661 Pullen et al. Mar 2005 B2
6914713 Chung et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922276 Zhang et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927892 Ho et al. Aug 2005 B2
6950220 Abramson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6956690 Yu et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958848 Cao et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958849 Chen et al. Oct 2005 B2
6982178 LeCain et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987603 Paolini, Jr. et al. Jan 2006 B2
7002728 Pullen et al. Feb 2006 B2
7012600 Zehner et al. Mar 2006 B2
7012735 Honeyman Mar 2006 B2
7038655 Herb et al. May 2006 B2
7052766 Zang et al. May 2006 B2
7061663 Cao et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071913 Albert et al. Jul 2006 B2
7072095 Liang et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075502 Drzaic et al. Jul 2006 B1
7079305 Paolini, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 B2
7109968 Albert et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110162 Wu et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110164 Paolini, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113323 Ho et al. Sep 2006 B2
7116318 Amundson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7116466 Whitesides et al. Oct 2006 B2
7141688 Feng et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142351 Chung et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144942 Zang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7170670 Webber Jan 2007 B2
7180649 Morrison et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184197 Liang et al. Feb 2007 B2
7202991 Zhang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7224511 Takagi May 2007 B2
7226550 Hou et al. Jun 2007 B2
7226966 Kambe et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230750 Whitesides et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230751 Whitesides et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236290 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 B1
7236291 Kaga et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242513 Albert et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247379 Pullen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7256766 Albert et al. Aug 2007 B2
7277218 Hwang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7286279 Yu et al. Oct 2007 B2
7304634 Albert et al. Dec 2007 B2
7307779 Cernasov Dec 2007 B1
7312784 Baucom et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312916 Pullen et al. Dec 2007 B2
7321459 Masuda et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327511 Whitesides et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339715 Webber et al. Mar 2008 B2
7375875 Whitesides et al. May 2008 B2
7382514 Hsu et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387858 Chari et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390901 Yang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391555 Albert et al. Jun 2008 B2
7405865 Ogiwara et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411719 Paolini, Jr. et al. Aug 2008 B2
7411720 Honeyman et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420549 Jacobson et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432907 Goden Oct 2008 B2
7453445 Amundson Nov 2008 B2
7473782 Yang et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477444 Cao et al. Jan 2009 B2
7507449 Chari et al. Mar 2009 B2
7532388 Whitesides et al. May 2009 B2
7532389 Li et al. May 2009 B2
7535624 Amundson et al. May 2009 B2
7560004 Pereira et al. Jul 2009 B2
7561324 Duthaler et al. Jul 2009 B2
7572394 Gu et al. Aug 2009 B2
7576904 Chung et al. Aug 2009 B2
7580180 Ho et al. Aug 2009 B2
7679814 Paolini, Jr. et al. Mar 2010 B2
7715088 Liang et al. May 2010 B2
7746544 Comiskey et al. Jun 2010 B2
7767112 Hou et al. Aug 2010 B2
7839564 Whitesides et al. Nov 2010 B2
7848006 Wilcox et al. Dec 2010 B2
7848007 Paolini, Jr. et al. Dec 2010 B2
7903319 Honeyman et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910175 Webber Mar 2011 B2
7929198 Lipovetskaya et al. Apr 2011 B2
7951938 Yang et al. May 2011 B2
7952790 Honeyman May 2011 B2
7955532 Liang et al. Jun 2011 B2
7957054 Yeo et al. Jun 2011 B1
7999787 Amundson et al. Aug 2011 B2
8009348 Zehner et al. Aug 2011 B2
8018640 Whitesides et al. Sep 2011 B2
8018642 Yeo et al. Sep 2011 B2
8035886 Jacobson Oct 2011 B2
8115729 Danner et al. Feb 2012 B2
8119802 Moonen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8129655 Jacobson et al. Mar 2012 B2
8183757 Mabeck et al. May 2012 B2
8184357 Yeo et al. May 2012 B2
8199395 Whitesides et al. Jun 2012 B2
8257614 Gu et al. Sep 2012 B2
8270064 Feick et al. Sep 2012 B2
8305341 Arango et al. Nov 2012 B2
8319759 Jacobson et al. Nov 2012 B2
8331016 Shitagami et al. Dec 2012 B2
8361620 Zang et al. Jan 2013 B2
8363306 Du et al. Jan 2013 B2
8384659 Yeo et al. Feb 2013 B2
8390918 Wilcox et al. Mar 2013 B2
8446664 Chen et al. May 2013 B2
8582196 Walls et al. Nov 2013 B2
8593718 Comiskey et al. Nov 2013 B2
8654436 Feick Feb 2014 B1
8810895 No et al. Aug 2014 B2
8902491 Wang et al. Dec 2014 B2
8961831 Du et al. Feb 2015 B2
9005494 Valianatos et al. Apr 2015 B2
9052564 Sprague et al. Jun 2015 B2
9114663 Ho et al. Aug 2015 B2
9158174 Walls et al. Oct 2015 B2
9279906 Kang Mar 2016 B2
9341915 Yang et al. May 2016 B2
9348193 Hiji et al. May 2016 B2
9361836 Telfer et al. Jun 2016 B1
9366935 Du et al. Jun 2016 B2
9372380 Du et al. Jun 2016 B2
9382427 Du et al. Jul 2016 B2
9423666 Wang et al. Aug 2016 B2
9428649 Li et al. Aug 2016 B2
9557623 Wang et al. Jan 2017 B2
9645467 Yokokawa et al. May 2017 B2
9658373 Downing May 2017 B2
9664978 Arango et al. May 2017 B2
9670367 Li et al. Jun 2017 B2
9688859 Yezek et al. Jun 2017 B2
9726957 Telfer et al. Aug 2017 B2
9777201 Widger et al. Oct 2017 B2
9778537 Wang et al. Oct 2017 B2
9835926 Sprague et al. Dec 2017 B2
9921451 Telfer et al. Mar 2018 B2
10067398 O'Keeffe Sep 2018 B2
10324353 O'Keeffe Jun 2019 B2
10372008 Telfer et al. Aug 2019 B2
10444590 Duthaler et al. Oct 2019 B2
10509242 O'Keeffe Dec 2019 B2
10656493 Heikenfeld et al. May 2020 B2
10824025 O'Keeffe Nov 2020 B2
20030048522 Liang et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030151029 Hsu et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030164480 Wu et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040030125 Li et al. Feb 2004 A1
20050012709 Ohshima Jan 2005 A1
20050012980 Wilcox et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050156340 Valianatos et al. Jul 2005 A1
20070091417 Cao et al. Apr 2007 A1
20080130092 Whitesides et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090009852 Honeyman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090122389 Whitesides et al. May 2009 A1
20090206499 Whitesides Aug 2009 A1
20090225398 Duthaler et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100148385 Balko et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110217639 Sprague Sep 2011 A1
20110286081 Jacobson Nov 2011 A1
20120049125 Du et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120118198 Zhou et al. May 2012 A1
20130161565 Laxton Jun 2013 A1
20130193385 Li et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130244149 Wang et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140011913 Du et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140078024 Paolini, Jr. et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140078573 Comiskey et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140078576 Sprague Mar 2014 A1
20140078857 Nelson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140104674 Ting et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140231728 Du et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140293399 Kimura Oct 2014 A1
20140307039 Tamoto Oct 2014 A1
20150177590 Laxton Jun 2015 A1
20150185509 Wang et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150241754 Du et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150277205 Kawahara et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150301425 Du et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160170106 Wang et al. Jun 2016 A1
20170097556 Wu et al. Apr 2017 A1
20180031942 Koch et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180364542 Widger et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180366069 Widger et al. Dec 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
1828350 Sep 2006 CN
103834285 Jun 2014 CN
2003222913 Aug 2003 JP
2004163818 Jun 2004 JP
20130078094 Jul 2013 KR
20160052092 May 2016 KR
1999010767 Mar 1999 WO
2019021578 Jan 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, Application No. GB1914933.5, Apr. 16, 2020.
Kitamura, T. et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display”, Asia Display/IDW '01, pp. 1517-1520, Paper HCS1-1 (2001).
Yamaguchi, Y. et al., “Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically”, Asia Display/IDW '01, pp. 1729-1730, Paper AMD4-4 (2001).
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2018/037508, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 8, 2018.
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2018/037479, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 11, 2019.
Wang, D.W. et al., “Microencapsulated electric ink using gelatin/gum arabic”, Journal of Microencapsulation, vol. 26:1, pp. 37-45, (2009).
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2020/053110, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 15, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210096439 A1 Apr 2021 US