Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention relates to electric stun devices and, more particularly, to electrically insulated coverings for darts that are expelled from the electric stun device by compressed air. Electrically insulating material is applied to areas of the darts that do not penetrate the living tissue of the target.
Electric stun devices have evolved with several methods for the delivery of a high voltage discharge to an intended target. Some of these methods include direct contact probes on the enclosure of the hand-held power supply for a direct contact method. Another method employs an auxiliary source propelled projectile with all elements of the power supply contained within the projectile. Yet another method utilizes electrically conductive liquids forcibly expelled from the hand-held power supply to deliver an immobilizing electric charge to a target. The most current and commercially available delivery system is that of dual compressed air propelled darts that serve as the high voltage electrode/projectiles with attached wires between the darts and the hand-held power supply. The leading end of each dart is fitted with a barb to penetrate the surface of, and secure itself to a target which in most cases is living tissue of a human being. This two tethered dart method is the system incorporated in the TAZER® device. The darts of the electric stun devices currently available are not insulated. The following U.S. Patents which disclose electric stun devices that employ the two tethered dart method of electric charge delivery or a reasonably similar method are cited. U.S. Pat. No. 3,523,538 entitled “ARREST DEVICE” issued on Aug. 11, 1970 to Kunio Shimizu discloses a delivery system that incorporates a single compressed air propelled projectile with two embedded electrodes and attached wires to the hand-held power supply. U.S. Pat. No. 3,803,463 entitled “WEAPON FOR IMMOBILIZATION AND CAPTURE” issued on Apr. 9, 1974 to John H Cover and U.S. Pat. No. 4,253,538 entitled “POWER SUPPLY FOR WEAPON FOR IMMOBILIZATION AND CAPTURE” issued on Feb. 24, 1981 to John H. Cover each disclose delivery systems using one or two tethered darts or a net tethered with a sufficient number of wires to the hand-held power supply. U.S. Pat. No. 5,654,867 entitled “IMMOBILIZATION WEAPON” issued on Aug. 5, 1997 to John H. Murray discloses a dual delivery system with the choice of the direct contact method or the two tethered dart method. U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,199 entitled “WEAPON FOR IMMOBILIZATION AND CAPTURE” issued on Nov. 3, 1998 to James McNulty Jr. et al discloses a delivery system that employs a modified two tethered dart method. U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,073 entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING A TWO PROJECTILE ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE WEAPON” issued Jun. 10, 2003 to James McNulty Jr. et al discloses the use of a modified two tethered dart delivery system. U.S. Pat. No. 6,636,412 B2 entitled “HAND-HELD STUN GUN FOR INCAPACITATING A HUMAN TARGET” issued on Oct. 21, 2003 to Patrick W. Smith discloses a delivery system that employs the two tethered dart method.
All of the electric stun devices disclosed in the aforementioned patents incorporate some form of electric and/or electronic circuitry which, if short-circuited, will disable the device by reducing the high voltage charge to a low or zero voltage. If these electric stun devices are operated with a short-circuit condition for a prolonged period of time, it is most likely that the electrical and/or electronic circuitry would be damaged and render the device useless until it is completely disassembled and repaired. Various puncture resistant garments, which are electrically conductive, are generally rigid shields worn external of clothing and are constructed of bulky inflexible metals such as titanium or other extremely hard metal alloys. A more detailed analysis of these metallic vests and garments can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,131,193 entitled “COMBINED PUNCTURE RESISTANT AND BALLISTIC RESISTANT PROTECTIVE GARMENT” issued Oct. 17, 2000 to Thomas E. Bachner Jr. The disadvantages of the garments described in the “Background of the Invention” of U.S. Pat. No. 6,131,193 are due to the bulk and rigidity of such externally worn metallic vests. The primary disadvantages are that they are uncomfortable to wear, decrease mobility, cause fatigue and are not readily concealable. Garments made from metal coated fabrics as cited in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/465,553 entitled “ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE APRON AND ACCESSORY TO PROTECT AGAINST ELECTRIC STUN DEVICE MISUSE” filed Mar. 21, 2011 by John L. Kotos and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/516,683 entitled “ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE PROTECTIVE GARMENT ENSEMBLE TO PROTECT AGAINST ELECTRIC STUN DEVICE MISUSE” filed Apr. 6, 2011 by John L. Kotos render the effectiveness of currently available electric stun devices using the two tethered dart method negligible. Thus, there is a need for an electrically insulated covering for electric stun device darts, so that when the barbed ends are embedded in the living tissue of a human or another living target while wearing a garment made from a metal coated fabric, the protective properties of the garment are nullified and the normal operation of the electric stun device is unaffected.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide electrically insulated darts for electric stun devices that cannot be accidentally or intentionally “shorted out” to the other dart that would render the intended effects of the electric stun device negligible. The present invention is specifically designed to counteract the protective properties of protective garment made from metal coated fabrics. It is another object of the present invention to provide electrically insulated darts for electric stun devices that cannot be accidentally or intentionally “shorted-out” to the other dart that could damage the electrical and/or electronic circuitry of the electric stun device. It is yet another object of the present invention that by preventing damage to the electrical/electronic circuitry of the electric stun device, the user of the electric stun device is protected from possible adverse effects of such damage. Such adverse effects can occur when the electric/electronic circuitry becomes damaged, the insulation breaks down within the hand-held power supply and the high voltage stun charge can arc onto the surface of the hand-held power supply. Another adverse effect of electric/electronic circuit damage comes in the form of over heated component starting on fire or exploding. Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention in its details and of fabrication and arrangement of materials will be seen from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention when considered with the drawings and from the appended claims.
The present invention has the primary objective of providing electrically insulated darts for electric stun devices that cannot be “shorted out” to each other because of protective garments manufactured using conductive metal bearing materials, such as metal coated fabrics. Electrically insulating most of the electric stun device darts, with the exception of a barbed end of each of the electric stun device darts that is embedded in the living tissue of a human target, would nullify the protective properties of the electrically conductive protective garment and permit proper operation of the electric stun device.
Referring now to the drawings in general, the illustrations are for the purpose of describing the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention thereto. All drawings are of an approximate proportion and approximate scale.
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the most common suitable insulating material is magnet wire enamel insulation. Enamel insulation applies evenly, is hard after curing and has a smooth slick finish. These traits would not hinder the electrically insulated dart (6) from being expelled from the cartridge of the electric stun device but would aid in the ejection. Enamel insulation is comprised of the following three main types: THEIC Polyester/polyesterimide, Polyurethane and Polyamideimide. In the manufacture of magnet wire, enamel insulation is applied as coatings by drawing a single filament of wire through a vessel of liquid coating and then cured. The vessel can be a bath or a die. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the enamel coating is applied to the dart (1) of
In another embodiment of the present invention, epoxy insulating coating powders are another type of suitable coatings that come in a variety of grades that are used low to high voltage applications such as bus bars, capacitors, electric motor armatures, electric motor cores, electric motor stators, magnet wire, resistors, thermistors, toroid cores, varistors, etc. These powders are applied to these components by several methods including: Standard fluid bed, Electrostatic fluid bed, Cascade coating, Epoxy spray and Inline wheel coating.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, another suitable coating type is ceramics which are proven protection for components used in the induction heating, welding and forging industries such as skid rails and rollers. Ceramic coatings are usually molten when applied to a component using one of a variety of thermal spray processes: wire arc spray, combustion spray, plasma spray and HVOF spraying.
In still another embodiment of the present invention, polymer coatings are generally elastomeric or thermoplastic which are applied in a liquid or powder form by air spray, airless spray, electrostatic spray, plural spray or dipping technology.
All of the processes mentioned for the application of an electrically insulating coating to individual components are processes that are well known to those skilled in the art and are applicable to all embodiments of present invention.
While the foregoing written description of the invention enables one of ordinary skill to make and use what is considered presently to be the best mode thereof, those of ordinary skill will understand and appreciate the existence of variations, combinations, and equivalents of the specific embodiment, method, and examples herein. The invention should therefore not be limited by the above described embodiment, method, and examples, but by all embodiments and methods within the scope and spirit of the invention as claimed.
U.S. Provisional Application for Patent No. 61/572,562, filed Jul. 18, 2011 entitled “ELECTRICALLY INSULATED COVERINGS FOR ELECTRIC STUN DEVICE DARTS” which is hereby incorporated by reference. Applicant claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119 (e).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3523538 | Shimizu | Aug 1970 | A |
3803463 | Cover | Apr 1974 | A |
4253538 | Weber et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
5654867 | Murray | Aug 1997 | A |
5831199 | McNulty et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6131193 | Bachner, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6575073 | McNulty et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6636412 | Smith | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20050039328 | Irby et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070063848 | Weisman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070167241 | Stethem et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20120255429 | Kotos | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130021716 | Kotos | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130021716 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61572562 | Jul 2011 | US |