1. Technical Field
The present disclosure is directed to multiport connector assemblies for a telecommunication connector system that are designed to reduce crosstalk noise between adjacent ports through advantageous electrical isolation design(s).
2. Background Art
As Unshielded Twisted Pair (“UTP”) cabling continues to be an essential choice of media transmission, new and improved methods must be employed meet the requirements of the transmitting data source. UTP cable is a popular and widely used type of data transfer media. UTP cable is a very flexible, low cost media, and can be used for either voice or data communications. In fact, UTP cable is in some respects the de facto standard for Local Area Networks (LANs), and other in-building voice and data communications applications. In an UTP, a pair of copper wires generally forms the twisted pair. For example, a pair of copper wires with diameters of 0.4-0.8 mm may be twisted together and wrapped with a plastic coating to form an UTP. The twisting of the wires increases the noise immunity and reduces the bit error rate (BER) of the data transmission to some degree. In addition, using two wires, rather than one, to carry each signal permits differential signaling to be utilized. Differential signaling is generally immune to the effects of external electrical noise.
The non-use of cable shielding (e.g., a foil or braided metallic covering) in fabricating UTP cable generally increases the effects of outside interference, but also results in reduced cost, size, and installation time of the cable and associated connectors. Additionally, non-use of cable shielding in UTP fabrication generally eliminates the possibility of ground loops (i.e., current flowing in the shield because of the ground voltage at each end of the cable not being the same). Ground loops may give rise to a current that induces interference within the cable, interference against which the shield was intended to protect.
The wide acceptance and use of UTP cable for data and voice transmission is primarily due to the large installed base, low cost and ease of new installation. Another important feature of UTP is that it is used for varied applications, such as for Ethernet, Token Ring, ATM, EIA-232, DSL, analog telephone (POTS), and other types of communication. This flexibility allows the same type of cable/system components (such as data jacks, plugs, cross-patch panels, and patch cables) to be used for an entire building, unlike shielded twisted pair media (STP). At present, UTP cabling is being utilized for systems having increasingly higher data rates. Since demands on networks using UTP systems (e.g., 100 Mbit/s and 1000 Mbit/s transmission rates) have increased, it has become necessary to develop industry standards for higher system bandwidth performance.
UTP systems such as 100 Mbit/s and 1000 Mbit/s transmission rates have produced requirements and specification for cabling transmission such as TIA 568B.2-1, which is basically the standard for category 6 cabling systems. The bandwidth requirements are 1 to 250 MHz. The main parameters are near-end crosstalk (NEXT), far-end crosstalk (FEXT), equal level FEXT, return loss (RL), attenuation, as well as, crosstalk Powersum parameters (PSNEXT) and PSELFEXT. From these parameters, one of the major contributors to system performance is control of NEXT. What began as the need for connecting hardware to provide NEXT loss of less than −36 dB at 16 MHz, has evolved to −54 dB at 100 MHz and −46 dB at 250 MHz for category 6 systems with future requirements up to 500 MHz. For any data transmission event, a received signal will consist of a transmission signal modified by various distortions. The distortions are added by the transmission system, along with additional unwanted signals that are inserted somewhere between transmission and reception. The unwanted signals are referred to as noise. Noise is the major limiting factor in the performance of today's communication systems. Problems that arise from noise include data errors, system malfunctions, and loss of the desired signals.
Generally, crosstalk noise occurs when a signal from one source is coupled to another line. Crosstalk noise could also be classified as electromagnetic interference (EMI). EMI occurs through the radiation of electromagnetic energy. Electromagnetic energy waves can be derived by Maxwell's wave equations. These equations are basically defined using two components: electric and magnetic fields. In unbounded free space, a sinusoidal disturbance propagates as a transverse electromagnetic wave. This means that the electric field vectors are perpendicular to the magnetic field vectors that lie in a plane perpendicular to the direction of the wave. NEXT noise is the effect of near-field capacitive (electrostatic) and inductive (magnetic) coupling between source and victim electrical transmissions.
Typical Category 5e, 6 and most likely C6 augmented connecting hardware will incorporate signal feedback techniques called compensation reactance. The use of compensation can decrease the internal noise associated with NEXT and FEXT, but it can also increase the connecting hardware external noise sources called alien near-end crosstalk (ANEXT) and alien far-end crosstalk (AFEXT), and the power summation of these noises.
ANEXT is near-end crosstalk noise that couples from one cabling media to an adjacent cabling media, measured at the near-end or transmitter. AFEXT is far-end crosstalk noise that couples from one cabling media to an adjacent cabling media, measured at the far-end or receiver. Power sum alien near-end crosstalk (PSANEXT) loss is a combination of signal coupling from multiple near-end disturbing cabling pairs into a disturbed pair of a neighboring cabling or part thereof, measured at the near-end. Power sum alien far-end crosstalk (PSAFEXT) loss is a combination of signal coupling from multiple far-end disturbing cabling pairs into a disturbed pair of a neighboring cabling or part thereof, measured at the far-end. IEEE 802.3 an 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10 Gbe) and the TIA TR42.7 working groups have identified ANEXT and AFEXT as major noise problems that can effect proper 10 Gbe operation over UTP cabling systems, with ANEXT being the most impactful of the two. The initial ANEXT requirement for UTP cabling system, also called “Augmented Category 6 UTP,” is shown in Table 1 below:
Connecting hardware systems that will run 10 Gbe data signals must be designed to meet traditional Category 6, as well as recognized additional 10 Gbe UTP cabling parameters. Due to the adjacency of connecting hardware in a cabling system, ANEXT and AFEXT noise sources will necessarily be present.
One approach to control ANEXT is the usage of a fully shielded cabling system, also called Foiled Twisted pair or Screened Twisted pair (ScTP). Typical FTP cabling system incorporates metallic shields that are electrically mated to ground by the transmitting source and/or by the equipment rack ground system. The connector shields are electrically connected together, either externally by mated shield contact or internally by the PCB connection. FTP systems are an effective media for reduction of ANEXT and AFEXT noise sources. Other methods for reducing ANEXT and AFEXT involve mitigation techniques, such as increasing connector spacing arrangement. Utilizing FTP or mitigation cabling methods provide various issues and increase complexities. In addition, FTP systems are considerably more expensive in material and installation cost. As previously discussed, another issue with FTP is proper installation of system grounds. Poor system grounding can create unwanted ground loops that could lead to increased system noise internally to the transmitter. Mitigation of connectors in many cases is not an option since standard wall outlets (i.e., single gang electrical boxes) and 1 rack unit (typ. 1.5 inch) high mount panels are spaced limited based on prior standards.
The present disclosure describes a multiport connector assembly having: (a) a plurality of PCB sub-assemblies, each sub assembly including: (i) at least one printed circuit board (PCB); (ii) a plurality of insulation displacement contact (IDC) pin groups having a plurality of IDC pins; and (iii) a modular insert; (b) a front housing; (c) a rear IDC housing having a plurality of IDC pin receptacles; and (d) a plurality of metalized modular housings, wherein each modular housing encloses a non-adjacent modular insert. Typically, each of the plurality of modular inserts is in electrical communication with the PCB and one of the plurality of IDC pin groups. The modular insert is adapted to receive a telecommunication connector plug, such as a RJ plug.
In an exemplary embodiment, the front housing defines a plurality of apertures wherein each aperture is adapted to receive one of the plurality of modular inserts and allow for insertion of the telecommunication connector plug. Each aperture is generally sized to receive a selected telecommunication plug, such as a RJ-45 plug. The front housing is typically made of plastic. A metalized modular housing is typically formed of metal or plastic that is coated (in whole or in part) in metal. An assembly associated with the present disclosure further includes an IDC pin shield coupled to the IDC pin groups. Typically, the IDC pin shield is selectively metalized.
According to an exemplary assembly according to the present disclosure, alternating modular inserts are enclosed with a metalized modular housing such that every other modular insert is enclosed within a metalized modular housing and each modular insert is electrically isolated from an adjacent modular insert. In such exemplary embodiment, the front housing is adapted to receive the alternatingly configured modular housings.
An exemplary multiport connector assembly associated with the present disclosure includes: (a) a plurality of PCB sub-assemblies, wherein each sub-assembly includes: a PCB, an IDC pin group having a plurality of IDC pins, and a modular insert; (b) a front housing; (c) a rear IDC housing having a plurality of IDC pin receptacles; and (d) a plurality of metalized modular housings, wherein each modular housing encloses a non-adjacent modular insert. The exemplary front housing defines a plurality of apertures, wherein each aperture is adapted to receive one of the plurality of the PCB sub-assemblies and allow for insertion of a telecommunication connector plug. The metalized modular housings are typically formed of metal or plastic plated (in whole or in part) with metal. Each modular housing encloses one modular insert in an alternating configuration such that every other modular insert is enclosed within a modular housing and each modular insert is electrically isolated from an adjacent modular insert.
In an exemplary embodiment, an assembly associated with the present disclosure includes the PCB sub-assemblies being arranged in a staggered configuration such that the modular inserts of each sub-assembly line-up substantially horizontally. In a further exemplary embodiment, the PCB sub-assemblies are arranged in a stacked configuration such that a first modular insert is directly above a second modular insert.
The present disclosure further relates to a method of reducing crosstalk noise within a multiport connector assembly by: (a) providing a plurality of PCB sub-assemblies, wherein each sub-assembly includes a PCB, an IDC pin group and a modular insert; (b) enclosing non-adjacent modular inserts with a metalized modular insert housing; and (c) enclosing the plurality of sub-assemblies and metalized modular insert housings within a front housing and a rear IDC pin housing. Enclosing the modular inserts with a modular insert housing electrically isolates one modular insert from an adjacent modular insert.
Further aspects, implementations, and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the description of the drawings and the detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention as provided herein below.
So that those having ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed invention appertains will more readily understand how to make and use the same, reference may be made to the drawings wherein:
The present disclosure describes a multiport connector assembly that is effective in reducing crosstalk noise associated with electronic signal transmission. Referring to
Rear IDC housing 15 is adapted to (i) house IDC pins 17 associated with the PCB's; and (ii) allow for appropriate wiring to establish communication with the front side telecommunication connector. In an exemplary embodiment, front housing 11 can be made of engineering plastics, such as a copolymer of Acrylonitrile, Butadiene, and Styrene (ABS). ABS plastics generally possess industrially acceptable strength and performance at a reasonable cost that can be color coded to the customer's selection.
In an exemplary embodiment, an assembly 10 includes a single PCB 14 having a plurality of modular inserts 13 and a plurality of IDC pins 17, wherein IDC pins 17 are a group of eight IDC pins and each group corresponds to a single modular insert 13. In an alternative embodiment, an assembly 10 includes plurality of PCB's, e.g., two PCB's (shown in
Typically, in a multi-PCB embodiment, each PCB 14 hosts at least one modular insert 13. Modular insert 13 extends away from PCB 14 towards the housing 11. In an exemplary embodiment, each of modular inserts 13 has a plurality of channel guides for receiving contacts of a telecommunication connector. Modular insert 13 typically contains terminals having eight lead frames in accordance with most standard wiring formations, such as the T568B and T568A style RJ-45 connectors. It is understood that assembly 10 can be sized and configured to receive any type of RJ plug. Each modular insert 14 is in electrical communication with at least one PCB 14 and is also mounted to PCB 14. PCB 14 includes a plurality of IDC pins 17 that extend from a rear face (not shown) of PCB 14 towards rear IDC housing 15. Rear housing 15 receives pins 17 in a plurality of IDC receptacles 18. Rear housing 15 is typically made from a polycarbonate or other like material.
It is common in the industry to design a PCB 14 having a plurality of IDC pins 17 to be substantially aligned horizontally. For example, in a multiport assembly such as assembly 10, IDC pins 17 associated with the first of the plurality of PCB's 14 will be substantially horizontally aligned on a top portion of PCB 14. Adjacent PCB's 14 will alternate IDC pin positions from the top portion to the bottom portion. Thus, in a six port assembly, ports one, three and five may be associated with IDC pins 17 aligned on the top portion of each respective PCB 14 and ports two, four, and six will be associated with IDC pins 17 aligned on the bottom portion of each respective PCB 14.
Assembly 10 includes a plurality of modular housings 12 arranged in an alternating configuration. Each modular housing 12 is adapted to receive a modular insert 13. In an exemplary embodiment of assembly 10, only every other modular insert 13 is enclosed by a modular housing 12. Thus, typically modular housings 12 are configured in an alternating manner. For example, as shown in
Referring to
Each exemplary housing 12 includes a main body 41 attached to an extending feature 42. Main body 41 is adapted to enclose a modular insert 13. Extending feature 42 is adapted to provide metallic isolation to IDC pins 17 associated with the enclosed modular insert 13. Each housing 12 is formed as a single component and is made to fit securely into a front housing 11 and adapted to receive a telecommunication plug.
Typically, all sides of housing 12 are metalized. By metalizing housing 12, each modular insert 13 and respective IDC pins 17 are essentially electrically insulated from adjacent modular inserts 13 and respective ID pins 17. Thus, alien crosstalk is reduced from one port to an adjacent port. In addition, it is understood that the metalized housing is not meant to be a conductive path from a shield in an FTP cable; instead, metalized housings 12 function as floating shields and are adapted to not conduct electricity. Housing 12 is floating relative to ground, thereby preventing assembly 10 from grounding out during operation. Moreover, each port of assembly 10 is isolated from adjacent ports, thereby reducing crosstalk noise. Housing 12 can be metallic plated plastic, metallic injected plastic or all metal material.
In an exemplary embodiment, each port of assembly 10 operates as follows. A plug (not shown), which is attached to a cable (not shown), is inserted into aperture 16 of front housing 11. The contacts of the plug mate with the contacts of modular insert 13. A signal from the cable is transmitted through the plug and modular inserts 13 into PCB 14. The signal is transferred from the PCB 14 to IDC pins 17, which is connected to a second cable, thus completing the data interface and transfer through assembly 10. By enclosing alternative modular inserts 13 with metalized modular housings 12, adjacent ports are insulated from each other and alien crosstalk is reduced from port-to-port.
Housing 12 can be described as defining a metallic cavity design. The metallic cavity design of housing 12 surrounds all the internal pairs associated with modular insert 13 to reduce the transmitted signals' electromagnetic radiation during transmission. By isolating each component in the interface system, the radiated noise from each port is individually controlled by coupling reduction. The initial benefit is the reduction of the internal signal EMI field because of the metallic shield's Shielded Effectiveness value (SE). The SE of the metallic material provides an effective barrier against internal, as well as external, noise sources. The metallic enclosure provides a shielded barrier against adjacent ports transmitting signal noises.
In a staggered configuration, PCB sub-assemblies 51, 53, and 55 may advantageously have similar (or identical) geometries. The geometries of sub-assemblies 51, 53, and 55 are typically different from the geometries of PCB sub-assemblies 52, 54, and 56, as shown in
A staggered configuration of PCB sub-assemblies 20 allows for assembling a multiport assembly 10 that is typical in the industry and effective in reducing crosstalk noise. Previous IDC pin configurations, such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/119,116 by Aekins, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, placed IDC pins above and below the modular insert. A top/bottom IDC pin configured connector can be used in an alternative embodiment of an assembly associated with the present disclosure. As previously described, a metalized modular housing 12 will enclose alternating PCB's. Each PCB includes IDC pins and a modular insert.
In an alternative embodiment, a multiport assembly can be designed to have a stacked rather than staggered alignment. In a stacked configuration, one port, along with the associated PCB's, will align vertically directly above a second port. In a typical exemplary stacked configuration, only one PCB is used with the modular inserts aligned one on top of another in pairs of two. In an alternative exemplary stacked configuration, two PCB's are used with three modular inserts on a top positioned PCB lined up in a row and three modular inserts on a bottom positioned PCB lined up in a row. A multiport assembly associated with a stacked configuration may have six ports, three on a top row and three on a bottom row. Each port typically includes the features described above with respect to the disclosed staggered configuration. In an exemplary embodiment, a modular housing 12 encloses alternating modular inserts, thus isolating an enclosed modular insert from adjacent modular inserts.
Referring again to
In an exemplary embodiment, assembly 10 further includes an IDC pin shield snapped into position on the outside of rear IDC housing 15. The IDC pin shield snaps onto IDC receptacles 18 and is metalized. Utilizing a metalized IDC shield adds further noise reduction and electrical isolation. In an exemplary embodiment, a single shield extending across more than one IDC pin group is used. In a further alternative embodiment, a plurality of IDC pin shields, each associated with an individual port's IDC pins is used.
The benefit of reducing connector transmitted signal EM noise is reduction in port-to-port near-end crosstalk or also called alien near-end crosstalk (ANEXT), that can be a problem in high speed networks such as 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GBASE-T). Isolation can also be achieved by the addition of a high frequency impedance device EMI Inductive source between ports to provide a common ground reference.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2714194 | Beynink | Jul 1955 | A |
4211462 | Wolfthal | Jul 1980 | A |
5046967 | Majernik et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059140 | Philippson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5106325 | Robinson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5186647 | Denkmann et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5269708 | DeYoung et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281170 | Murphy | Jan 1994 | A |
5299956 | Brownell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5310363 | Brownell et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326284 | Bohbot et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341419 | Ferry | Aug 1994 | A |
5350324 | Guilbert | Sep 1994 | A |
5362257 | Neal et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5399107 | Gentry et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414393 | Rose et al. | May 1995 | A |
5432484 | Klas et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5503572 | White et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513065 | Caveney et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5547405 | Pinney et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5586914 | Foster, Jr., et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599209 | Belopolsky | Feb 1997 | A |
5618185 | Aekins | Apr 1997 | A |
5628653 | Haas et al. | May 1997 | A |
5639266 | Patel | Jun 1997 | A |
5647770 | Belopolsky | Jul 1997 | A |
5674093 | Vaden | Oct 1997 | A |
5687478 | Belopolsky | Nov 1997 | A |
5697817 | Bouchan et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5759070 | Belopolsky | Jun 1998 | A |
5779503 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797764 | Coulombe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830005 | Watanabe | Nov 1998 | A |
5864089 | Rainal | Jan 1999 | A |
5911602 | Vaden | Jun 1999 | A |
5913702 | Garcin | Jun 1999 | A |
5931703 | Aekins | Aug 1999 | A |
5938479 | Paulson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5997358 | Adriaenssens et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023200 | Rhee | Feb 2000 | A |
6033259 | Daoud | Mar 2000 | A |
6086428 | Pharney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089923 | Phommachanh | Jul 2000 | A |
6113418 | Kjeldahl | Sep 2000 | A |
6116943 | Ferrill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120329 | Steinman | Sep 2000 | A |
6155881 | Arnett et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168474 | German et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183306 | Caveney | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186834 | Arnett et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6231397 | De la Borbolla et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6290546 | Pharney | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302741 | Fasold et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319048 | Aekins et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346010 | Emplit | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361354 | Viklund et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371793 | Doorhy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394844 | Frias Valero et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6443777 | McCurdy et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504726 | Grabinger et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6524131 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533618 | Aekins | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6608764 | Clark et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611943 | Ferrill et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6729899 | Aekins et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736670 | Clark et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743047 | Korsunsky et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761585 | Clark et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767241 | Abel et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769937 | Roberts | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6729901 | Aekins et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6802743 | Aekins et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6840816 | Aekins | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848943 | Machado et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6893296 | Aekins et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896557 | Aekins et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6962503 | Aekins | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7037140 | Aekins et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7112090 | Caveney et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20020151208 | Aekins | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030095395 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050095920 | Aekins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151208 | Uno et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 674 364 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 955 703 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0 955 703 | Nov 2001 | EP |