The present invention relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with a subterranean well and, in an embodiment described herein, more particularly provides electrically operated well tools.
Actuators for downhole well tools are typically either hydraulically or electrically operated. Hydraulic actuators have certain disadvantages, for example, the need to run long control lines from the surface to the actuator, problems associated with maintaining a sealed hydraulic circuit, increased resistance to flow through the hydraulic circuit with increased depth, etc.
Electric actuators also have disadvantages. Some of these disadvantages are associated with the fact that typical electric actuators are either powered “on” or “off.” For example, in the case of solenoid-type electric actuators, the actuator is in one state or position when current is applied to the actuator, and the actuator is in another state or position when current is not applied to the actuator. This provides only a minimal degree of control over operation of the well tool.
Therefore, it may be seen that improvements are needed in the art of actuating well tools.
In carrying out the principles of the present invention, a well system is provided in which at least one problem in the art is solved. One example is described below in which an actuator for a well tool provides enhanced control over operation of the well tool. Another example is described below in which the actuator is uniquely constructed for use in a wellbore environment.
In one aspect of the invention, a well system is provided which includes a well tool positioned in a wellbore. The well tool includes an operating member which is displaceable to operate the well tool.
An actuator of the well tool includes a series of longitudinally distributed electromagnets. Current in the electromagnets is controllable in one or more predetermined patterns to thereby variably control longitudinal displacement of the operating member.
In another aspect of the invention, a well system is provided which includes a well tool positioned in a wellbore, the well tool having an operating member and a housing assembly. The operating member is displaceable relative to the housing assembly between opposite maximum limits of displacement.
An actuator of the well tool includes at least one electromagnet. The electromagnet is operative to displace the operating member to at least one position between the opposite maximum limits of displacement.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a method of operating a well tool in a subterranean well is provided. The method includes the steps of: positioning the well tool within a wellbore of the well, the well tool including an operating member and an actuator for displacing the operating member to operate the well tool; and operating the well tool by controlling current in a series of longitudinally distributed electromagnets of the actuator in a predetermined pattern, thereby causing corresponding longitudinal displacement of the operating member.
These and other features, advantages, benefits and objects of the present invention will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the detailed description of representative embodiments of the invention hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings, in which similar elements are indicated in the various figures using the same reference numbers.
It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the present invention described herein may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present invention. The embodiments are described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the invention, which is not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.
In the following description of the representative embodiments of the invention, directional terms, such as “above”, “below”, “upper”, “lower”, etc., are used for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings. In general, “above”, “upper”, “upward” and similar terms refer to a direction toward the earth's surface along a wellbore, and “below”, “lower”, “downward” and similar terms refer to a direction away from the earth's surface along the wellbore.
Representatively illustrated in
The well tool 12 is depicted as a safety valve for selectively permitting and preventing flow through an internal flow passage of the tubular string 18. The well tool 14 is depicted as a packer for forming an annular pressure barrier in a annulus 22 between the tubular string 18 and the wellbore 20. The well tool 16 is depicted as a flow control device (such as a production, testing or circulating valve, or a choke, etc.) for regulating flow between the annulus 22 and the interior flow passage of the tubular string 18.
It should be clearly understood that the well system 10 is described herein as only one application in which the principles of the invention are useful. Many other well systems, other types of well tools, etc. can incorporate the principles of the invention, and so it will be appreciated that these principles are not limited to any of the details of the well system 10 and well tools 12, 14, 16 described herein.
One or more lines 24 are connected to the well tool 12 and extend to a remote location, such as the surface or another remote location in the well. In this example of the well system 10, the lines 24 are electrical conductors and are used at least in part to supply electrical signals to an actuator of the well tool 12 in order to control operation of the well tool. Alternatively, electrical signals could be supplied by means of other types of lines (such as optical conductors, whereby optical energy is converted into electrical energy in the well tool actuator), or by means of downhole batteries or downhole electrical power generation, etc. Thus, the lines 24 are not necessary in keeping with the principles of the invention.
Referring additionally now to
The electromagnet assembly 30 includes a series of longitudinally distributed electromagnets 32. The electromagnets 32 are depicted in
In an important feature of the well tool 12, current the electromagnets 32 can be individually controlled via the lines 24. That is, current in any of the individual electromagnets 32, and any combination of the electromagnets, can be controlled in any of multiple predetermined patterns in order to provide enhanced control over operation of the well tool 12.
The electromagnet assembly 30 is a part of an actuator 34 of the well tool 12. Another part of the actuator 34 is a magnet assembly 36. The magnet assembly 36 includes a series of longitudinally distributed annular permanent magnets 38.
The magnet assembly 36 is connected to an operating member 40 of the well tool 12. The operating member 40 is depicted as a flow tube or opening prong of the safety valve. Displacement of the operating member 40 by the actuator 34 is used to operate the well tool 12, for example, by opening and closing a closure assembly 42 of the safety valve.
However, any other types of operating members could be used in keeping with the principles of the invention. For example, if the well tool is a packer (such as the well tool 14), then the operating member could be a setting mandrel or other actuating device of the packer. If the well tool is a flow control device (such as the well tool 16), then the operating member could be a closure member, a flow choking member or other actuating member of the flow control device.
As depicted in
The closure assembly 42 as illustrated in
Although the closure member 44 is depicted in the drawings in the form of a flapper, it should be understood that any type of closure member could be used in any type of closure assembly in keeping with the principles of the invention. For example, a ball valve or sleeve valve could be used instead of a flapper valve, if desired.
In conventional safety valves, an actuator is typically operated merely to alternately position a flow tube or opening prong at its opposite two maximum displacement limits. That is, pressure or electrical current is applied to displace the flow tube or opening prong in one direction to open the safety valve, and the pressure or current is released or discontinued to displace the flow tube or opening prong in an opposite direction to close the safety valve. Thus, the pressure or current is “on” or “off” to correspondingly open or close the safety valve.
In contrast, the actuator 34 is uniquely constructed to permit a wide variety of different types of displacements of the operating member 40. In particular, the electromagnets 32 and magnets 38 are arranged so that displacement of the operating member 40 relative to the housing assembly 28 and closure assembly 42 can be controlled in multiple different ways.
For example, the magnets 38 can be radially polarized, and the polarizations of the individual magnets can be arranged in a specific pattern. Accordingly, current can be controlled in the individual electromagnets 32 in a corresponding pattern to thereby produce a corresponding radially polarized pattern of magnetic fields. Due to the magnetic field patterns produced by the magnets 38 and the electromagnets 32, the operating member 40 can be biased to displace in either longitudinal direction, to remain motionless in any desired position (including any position between its maximum limits of displacement), to vibrate back and forth at any desired position, to accelerate as desired, and to decelerate as desired.
The benefits of these features of the actuator 34 are virtually unlimited. Several examples of the many benefits afforded by the actuator 34 are set forth below, but it should be clearly understood that this is a necessarily incomplete listing, and the invention is not limited in any way to the benefits discussed below.
The actuator 34 can displace the operating member 40 downward from its upper maximum limit of displacement depicted in
The actuator 34 can periodically displace the operating member 40 upward somewhat from its lower maximum limit of displacement depicted in
The actuator 34 can rapidly accelerate the operating member 40 upward from its lower maximum limit of displacement depicted in
The actuator 34 can rapidly decelerate the opening member 40 as it approaches its upper or lower maximum limit of displacement. In this manner, the mechanical shock which would otherwise be produced when the operating member 40 abruptly contacts the housing assembly 28 or other portion of the well tool 12 can be minimized or even eliminated. This “braking” function of the actuator 34 may be particularly useful in the situation described above in which the operating member 40 is initially rapidly accelerated to minimize stresses in a “slam closure.” Thus, the actuator 34 may be used to produce an initial rapid acceleration of the operating member 40, followed by a rapid deceleration of the operating member.
Preferably, less current is required in the electromagnet assembly 30 to maintain the operating member 40 in a certain position (for example, in an open configuration of the safety valve when the operating member is at its lower maximum limit of displacement) than is required to accelerate, decelerate or otherwise displace the operating member. In this manner, less electrical power is required during long term use of the actuator 34.
The actuator 34 can also be used as a position sensor. For example, depending on the position of the magnet assembly 36 relative to the electromagnet assembly 30, the electromagnets 32 will have correspondingly different resistance to flow of current therethrough. Thus, current flow through the electromagnets 32 is a function of the position of the magnets 38 relative to the electromagnets. This function will change depending on the specific construction, dimensions, etc. of the well tool 12, but the function can be readily determined, at least empirically, once a specific embodiment is constructed. By evaluating the electrical properties of the electromagnets 32 and using the function, the position of the magnets 38 (and thus the operating member 40) relative to the electromagnets can be determined.
The actuator 34 can be used to “exercise” the safety valve as part of routine maintenance. Thus, the operating member 40 can be displaced upward and downward as needed to verify the functionality of the safety valve and to maintain a satisfactory operating condition by preventing moving elements from becoming “frozen” in place due to corrosion, mineral or paraffin deposits, etc.
The actuator 34 can be used to positively bias the operating member 40 to a closed position (e.g., its upper maximum limit of displacement). Typical conventional safety valves rely on a biasing device (such as a spring or compressed gas) to close the valve in the event that applied hydraulic pressure or electrical power is lost (e.g., either intentionally or due to an accident or emergency situation). In contrast, current applied to the electromagnet assembly 30 in a certain pattern can be used to bias the operating member 40 upward, and current applied to the electromagnet assembly in another pattern can be used to bias the operating member downward. Thus, the safety valve of
These features of the actuator 34 are similarly useful in other types of well tools. For example, in the well tool 14 the actuator 34 could be used to set and unset the packer. In the well tool 16, the actuator 34 could be used to increase and decrease flow rate through the valve or choke.
Of course, the well tool 12 can include a biasing device 56 (depicted in
An example of a linear actuator which utilizes annular magnet and electromagnet assemblies is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,440,183. The entire disclosure of this patent is incorporated herein by this reference. The annular magnet and electromagnet assemblies described in the incorporated patent may be used in the actuator 34, if desired. However, it should be clearly understood that other types of magnet and electromagnet assemblies may be used in keeping with the principles of the invention.
Although the electromagnet assembly 30 is depicted in
Furthermore, the magnet assembly 36 does not necessarily include permanent magnets, but could instead include electromagnets (such as the electromagnets 32 in the electromagnet assembly 30). Thus, instead of using the electromagnets 32 and the permanent magnets 38, the actuator 34 could use two sets of electromagnets, with one set of electromagnets being secured to the housing assembly 28, and with the other set of electromagnets being attached to the operating member 40.
A pressure bearing rigid annular wall 58 is depicted in
Current in particular electromagnets 32 may be controlled in various manners to thereby control displacement of the operating member 40. For example, the current in the electromagnets 32 could be switched on and off in predetermined patterns, the current direction or polarity could be varied, the voltage could be varied, the current amplitude could be varied, the current could be manipulated in other manners, etc. Thus, it should be understood that current in the electromagnets may be controlled in any way, and in any pattern, in keeping with the principles of the invention.
Note that it is not necessary for the electromagnet assembly 30 to be isolated from the fluid pressure in the passage 50. For example, the wall 58 could be thin enough, or could be made of a suitable material, so that pressure is transmitted from the passage 50 to the assembly 30. As another example, the electromagnets 32 could be “potted” or otherwise provided with an insulating layer, so that it is not necessary to isolate the electromagnets from the passage 50 with a rigid wall. Thus, it will be appreciated that the specific construction details of the well tool 12 depicted in the drawings and described herein are merely examples of ways in which the invention may be practiced in these embodiments.
A person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments of the invention, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to these specific embodiments, and such changes are within the scope of the principles of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2703532 | Alexander | Mar 1955 | A |
3196948 | Dye | Jul 1965 | A |
3666030 | Bohn et al. | May 1972 | A |
3731742 | Sizer et al. | May 1973 | A |
3854695 | Baugh | Dec 1974 | A |
4058166 | Crickmer | Nov 1977 | A |
RE30110 | Huebsch et al. | Oct 1979 | E |
4191248 | Huebsch et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4295795 | Gass et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4407329 | Huebsch et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4467870 | Langham | Aug 1984 | A |
4566534 | Going, III | Jan 1986 | A |
4579177 | Going | Apr 1986 | A |
4619323 | Gidley | Oct 1986 | A |
4649993 | Going | Mar 1987 | A |
4667736 | Rumbaugh et al. | May 1987 | A |
4725783 | Miyairi et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4732225 | Jurgens et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4771982 | Bodine et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4793379 | Eidsmore | Dec 1988 | A |
4796708 | Lembcke | Jan 1989 | A |
4798247 | Deaton et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4886114 | Perkins et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4940207 | Katsuyama | Jul 1990 | A |
4981173 | Perkins et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5039061 | Heard et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5070595 | Perkins et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5070944 | Hopper | Dec 1991 | A |
5257663 | Pringle et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5291947 | Stracke | Mar 1994 | A |
5293551 | Perkins et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299640 | Streich et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5310012 | Cendre et al. | May 1994 | A |
5358035 | Grudzinski | Oct 1994 | A |
5409031 | McGill et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5440183 | Denne | Aug 1995 | A |
5465786 | Akkerman | Nov 1995 | A |
5558153 | Holcombe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5620048 | Beauquin | Apr 1997 | A |
5734209 | Hallidy | Mar 1998 | A |
5913337 | Williams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917774 | Walkow et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6016845 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041857 | Carmody et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6112809 | Angle | Sep 2000 | A |
6161722 | Sooudi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6237693 | Deaton | May 2001 | B1 |
6253843 | Rawson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302210 | Crow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321845 | Deaton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6352118 | Dickson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361299 | Quigley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364023 | Hiron et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427778 | Beall et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433991 | Deaton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478090 | Deaton | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491106 | Simonds | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6568470 | Goodson et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6619388 | Dietz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626244 | Powers | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6700264 | Chu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6748977 | Berto | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6863124 | Araux et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6988556 | Vick | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20020023759 | Deaton | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020108747 | Dietz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112861 | Restarick et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030019622 | Goodson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030155131 | Vick, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0436214 | Dec 1990 | EP |
2200775 | Aug 1988 | GB |
11093883 | Apr 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080053662 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |