This invention relates generally to an electro-hydraulic pump control system for controlling displacement of a pump. More particularly, the invention is directed to a method and arrangement for a hydraulic pump control that utilizes pump characteristics determined from operation of a pump and a force feedback control.
Variable displacement pumps are well known in the industry to drive an implement or a hydraulic motor or any combinations thereof. It is also well known that the speed of an actuator (i.e., hydraulic cylinder) and/or pressure of the fluid in the system may be controlled by varying the displacement of the hydraulic pump. Variable displacement pumps generally include a drive shaft, a rotatable cylinder barrel having multiple piston bores, and pistons held against a tiltable swash plate biased by a spring mechanism. When the swash plate is tilted relative to the longitudinal axis of the drive shaft, the pistons reciprocate within the piston bores to produce a pumping action. Each piston bore is subject to intake and discharge pressures during each revolution of the cylinder barrel. As the piston bores sweep pass the top and bottom center positions, a swivel force is generated on the swash plate as a result of the reciprocating pistons and pressure carryover within the piston bores. This swivel torque, depending on certain operating parameters of the pump, urges the swash plate to change its displacement position. In some variable displacement pump control systems, the swivel torque forces are utilized for controlling the displacement. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,564,905, which issued on Oct. 15, 1996 to Noah D. Manring, teaches using the forces generated by swivel torques to control the arcuate movement of the port plate within the pump thus controlling the forces being generated by the swivel torques which then are used to control the position of the swash plate. Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 6,179,570, which issued on Jan. 30, 2001 to David P. Smith, teaches using the inherent forces generated by the swivel torques to aid in the control of the speed of a fluid motor. It is desirable to provide a control that not only uses the inherent swivel forces but to also provide a control that has a minimum number of moving parts, good controllability throughout the whole operating range, is precise and repeatable in positioning the swash plate.
In one aspect of the subject invention, a variable displacement control arrangement is provided for controlling the displacement of a variable displacement fluid translating device having a pressure outlet port and an adjustable swash plate. The control arrangement includes an actuator mechanism connected to the adjustable swash plate and a source of pressurized pilot fluid connected through a proportional valve arrangement to the actuator mechanism. A force feedback mechanism is disposed between the actuator mechanism and the proportional valve arrangement.
In another aspect of the subject invention, a method of controlling the displacement of a fluid translating device having an adjustable swash plate is provided and includes the steps of providing a source of pressurized pilot fluid, providing an actuator mechanism connected to the adjustable swash plate, providing a proportional valve arrangement between the source of pressurized pilot fluid and the actuator mechanism, and providing a force feedback mechanism between the actuator mechanism and the proportional valve arrangement.
Referring to
As best illustrated in
Referring to
In an exemplary embodiment, the pump 10 may include a maximum displacement of 250 cubic centimeters (cc) having multiple operating speeds (RPM) and which produce system pressures up to 40,000 kilopascals (kPa), for example (FIG. 3). Dotted line 40 represents the swivel forces being generated within the exemplary pump 10 being operated at 800 RPM. Represented by the line 40, the swivel forces are at a minimum value when the system pressure is below 10,000 kPa and, in contrast, are approximately −13 kilonewtons (kN) when the system pressure is approximately 35,000 kPa. Dashed line 42 represents the swivel forces being generated within the exemplary pump 10 while being operated at 1600 RPM. Represented by the line 42, the swivel forces may be approximately +2 kN when the system pressure is below 10,000 kPa and, in contrast, are approximately −17 kN when the system pressure is approximately 35,00 kPa. Solid line 44 represents the swivel forces being generated within the pump 10 while being operated at 2250 RPM. Represented by the line 44, the swivel forces are approximately +5 kN when the system pressure is below 10,000 kPa and, in contrast, are approximately —18 kilonewtons (kN) when the system pressure is approximately 35,000 kPa. It will be understood that pumps of different operating capacities, having different inherent swivel torques may also produce similar results, however, it should be recognized that when operating at higher system pressures, the swivel torques will normally be urging the swash plate 20 towards a smaller displacement position.
Referring to
The control arrangement 50 includes an actuator mechanism 58 that is operative to move the swash plate 20 between its minimum (MIN) and maximum (MAX) displacement positions. The actuator mechanism 58 is connected to the swash plate 20 by a mechanical link mechanism 60. The actuator mechanism 58 includes an actuator member 62 disposed within the control arrangement 50 and is connected to the mechanical link mechanism 60. The actuator member 62 has a first end portion 64 of a predetermined cross-sectional area disposed in a first pressure chamber 66 defined in the control arrangement 50. The first pressure chamber 66 is in communication with the outlet port 56 of the pump 10 by a passage 68. A spring member 69 is disposed in the first pressure chamber 66 and is operatively in contact with the first end portion 64 of the actuator member 62. The spring member 69 functions to move the swash plate 20 away from its minimum displacement position during initial startup. The actuator member 62 also has a second end portion 70 of a predetermined cross-sectional area. The second end portion 70 is disposed in a second pressure chamber 72 of the control arrangement 50. In an exemplary embodiment, the cross-sectional area of the first end portion 64 is smaller than the cross-sectional area of the second end portion 70, however it is envisioned that other suitable cross-sectional areas of the first and second end portions 64, 70 may be used. The cross-sectional area of the first end portion 64 of the actuator member 62 is sized to provide a force that would offset the maximum swivel torque that would be acting to decrease the displacement of the pump 10. That force is the cross-sectional area of the first end portion 64 times the pressure at the outlet port 56. The larger, second end portion 70 is sized to produce a force that would offset or balance the maximum swivel torque that would be acting to increase the displacement of the pump 10. That force is the cross-sectional area of the second end portion 70 times a lower control pressure hereinafter described. A source of pressurized pilot fluid 74 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the pilot pump’) is connected to the second pressure chamber 72 of the actuator mechanism 62 through a proportional valve arrangement 76 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the valve’) disposed within the control arrangement 50. The pilot pump 74 is one example of the constant, low pressure source noted above. A force feedback mechanism 78, such as a spring 80, is disposed between the actuator member 62 and the valve 76 and is operative to bias the valve 76 towards its first operative position. The valve 76 is movable towards its second operative position in response to an electrical signal received through an electrical line 82 from a controller 84. In the subject arrangement, the controller 84 is of a known electronic type. The degree of movement of the valve 76 is proportional to the magnitude of the electrical signal received from the controller 84. In turn, the magnitude of the electrical signal being generated by the controller may be dependent on a control scheme in the form of a control algorithm, for example.
At the first operative position of the valve 76, pressurized fluid from the pilot pump 74 is in communication with the second pressure chamber 72 and in the second operative position thereof, the pilot pump 74 is blocked from the second pressure chamber 72 and the second pressure chamber 72 is in communication with the reservoir 52.
In use with no electrical signal being generated by the controller 84, the actuator member 62 is in its leftmost position, as viewed in
When pressurized fluid flow is required in the work system 54, the controller 84 generates an electrical signal and directs the electrical signal through the electrical line 82 to the solenoid of the valve 76. The valve 76 moves against the bias of the force feedback mechanism 78 an amount proportional to the magnitude of the electrical signal. As the valve 76 moves towards its second operative position, a portion of the pressurized fluid within the second pressure chamber 72 is vented to the reservoir 52 thus reducing the pressure within the second pressure chamber 72. As a result of the lower pressure within the second pressure chamber 72, the actuator member 62 moves in a rightward direction, as viewed in FIG. 4. As the actuator member 62 moves, the displacement of the swash plate 20 is increased through the action of the mechanical link mechanism 60. As the actuator member 62 moves in the rightward direction, the force of the force feedback mechanism 78 is increased. Once the force of the force feedback mechanism 78 is increased to the point at which it overcomes the force established by the electrical signal, the valve 76 is maintained in a balanced position, thus maintaining a constant pressure in the second pressure chamber 72. If additional pressurized fluid is needed in the work system 54, the controller 84 increases the electrical signal and the force created by the solenoid moves the valve 76 further to the left, thus further decreasing the pressure in the second pressure chamber 72. With a further decrease of pressure in the second pressure chamber 72, the actuator member 62 moves further to the right resulting in the swash plate 20 moving to a greater angle of displacement. Again, as the force of the force feedback mechanism 78 increases, it reaches a point again at which the force therefrom balances the force established by the electrical signal and the pressure in the second pressure chamber 72 is maintained at a constant pressure level. As can be readily recognized from the above, any increase or decrease in the electrical signal from the controller 84 results in a proportional increase or decrease of the displacement of the pump 10.
In view of the foregoing, it is readily apparent that a variable displacement control arrangement 50 is provided that uses the favorable direction of the inherent swivel torques within the pump 10 to provide a simple control arrangement that has good controllability throughout the whole operating range, independent of the pump discharge pressure, and is very repeatable and precise in positioning the swash plate 20. This repeatability comes from the inherent, internal closed loop of the force feedback/valve mechanism. This same control arrangement 50 could be used for other modes of operation, such as, flow control pressure cut-off, torque limiting control, etc. by merely using a different control software within the controller 84.
Other aspects, objects and advantages of this invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3665814 | Ankeny | May 1972 | A |
3976098 | Raymond | Aug 1976 | A |
4139987 | Budzich | Feb 1979 | A |
4479104 | Ettinger et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4510750 | Izumi et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4528814 | Stuhr | Jul 1985 | A |
4864822 | Wachs et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5058383 | Tsunemi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5554007 | Watts | Sep 1996 | A |
5564905 | Manring | Oct 1996 | A |
5568762 | Manring | Oct 1996 | A |
5588805 | Geringer | Dec 1996 | A |
5865602 | Nozari | Feb 1999 | A |
5876185 | Schimpf et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6179570 | Smith | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6374722 | Du et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375433 | Du et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6468046 | Du et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20020176784 | Du | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040099136 A1 | May 2004 | US |