The present invention relates to the field of model train couplers, and more specifically, an electromechanical coupler capable of being remotely operated, which allows for a “single-handed” release operation and which is in scale or near scale proportion to the model train the coupler is being utilized in.
Model electric trains are well known and have been in existence for over 100 years. Typically, the model electric train systems are scale or near-scale proportioned models intended to simulate real world trains in a miniature form. As is also well known, there are a variety of sizes or “scales” of model trains commonly found in the marketplace, for example, O-gauge, HO-gauge, N-gauge, etc. Hobbyists collect and/or operate model trains in elaborate simulations of real-world environments. The modeling of these environments and simulations of real-world operations is one of the foundations of the hobby itself.
One of the significant objectives for most hobbyists is to create as close to the lifelike situation, regarding both look and operation, as possible. An important aspect regarding the operation of model trains is to simulate the act of connecting and disconnecting various train cars or rolling stock from one another. The terms used, in both the real world as well as model railroading, are coupling (i.e., connecting) and uncoupling (i.e., disconnecting). As explained further below, this important aspect of model railroading has been accomplished through a wide variety of manual, mechanical, and electrical means.
Generally speaking, the term “operating coupler” refers to a coupler which can be opened or closed by some mechanical or electrical (of combination thereof) means. Opening and closing a coupler is usually accomplished by releasing or latching a “knuckle” member into one of a closed position (in which the knuckle member would engage a knuckle member of an adjacent car thereby connecting the two cars) and an open position (in which the knuckle will not engage the knuckle member of the adjacent car thereby preventing connection of the two cars). Typically, the phrase “releasing the knuckle” refers to placing the knuckle member in the open position, the phrase “latching the knuckle” refers to placing the knuckle member in the closed or coupled position.
There are numerous prior art couplers which are manually operated (i.e., placed in either the opened or closed position). These couplers can be opened by the operator by pressing a given tab or arm on the coupler or in some cases, pressing a device attached to the track that indirectly opens the coupler. In such manually operated couplers, a manual latch mechanism, usually spring loaded, keeps the coupler in the closed position until it is physically opened by the operator by pushing, for example, the aforementioned tab.
Another prior art version of a known coupler is mechanical in nature and provides for an electro-magnet to physically release a latch pin, which functions to maintain the knuckle in the closed position and therefore the connection between the two cars. This type of coupler is a common design in O-gauge model trains and has been available in the market for decades. In this design, an electromagnet is embedded in a section of train track. A coupler can be positioned above the magnet such that when the coil in the track is energized, the resultant magnetic field pulls an armature downward, thus releasing the latch pin. Once the latch pin is released, the cars can be separated from one another. This same design often includes a tab to allow for manual operation by the operator.
Yet another type of operating coupler is referred to as a “coil coupler.” In this design, the latch pin is either directly connected to or is integral with a plunger in a solenoid. When the solenoid coil is energized, the plunger is pulled in such a way so as to release the latch holding the coupler closed. In this design, as well as others discussed above, it is common for there to be a spring loaded tension against the knuckle biased toward opening the knuckle. As such, some form of latch pin or other mechanical interference is necessary to hold the coupler in the closed position.
It is clear from the foregoing that there are numerous coupler designs and mechanics that in the end, perform the task of connecting two or more train cars. There are also European style “hook and loop” couplers that do not resemble prototypical couplers found on US railroads. These couplers are considered “operational” in the sense that a mechanical device installed in the track can open them manually as the train car passes over the mechanical device.
All of the known coupler devices suffer from at least one of the following problems and many suffer from both. First, many of the couplers are out of proportion with the given scale in both size and shape. Second, many of the couplers can be opened at only set locations around the track (i.e., a position corresponding to the location of a magnet) and/or require manual operation by the operator to release the coupler. Both of these issues represent significant shortcomings to model train operators, especially in the case of HO-gauge, where precision to both scale and shape of the model train and operation thereof is of significant importance to the model train hobbyist.
As such, there is a need in model train systems for a coupler that solves both of the foregoing problems associated with known prior art couplers.
In an effort to solve the foregoing needs, one objective of the present invention is to provide a coupler that is scale or near scale with respect to both size and shape and, and which allows for automatic operation of the coupler at substantially any time and any location about the rail system without requiring the operator to physically engage or contact the car being uncoupled. In other words, it is an object of the present invention to provide a coupler capable of remote operation which is substantially in scale in both size and shape so as to allow the operator to remotely control the coupler by, for example, activating a switch.
In a first embodiment, the coupler includes a body member; a knuckle pivotally mounted on the body member, where the knuckle is in either an open state or a closed state; a coupler guide disposed on the body member; and a locking pin disposed on the body member. The locking pin is operable for maintaining the knuckle in the closed state when the locking pin is in a first position, and for allowing the knuckle to transition to the open state when the locking pin is in a second position. Further, when the knuckle is in the open state the coupler guide prevents the knuckle from engaging a knuckle of a second coupler to be uncoupled from the coupler.
In a second embodiment, the coupler includes a body member; a knuckle pivotally mounted on the body member, where the knuckle is in either an open state or a closed state; a locking pin disposed on the body member, where the locking pin is operable for maintaining the knuckle in the closed state when the locking pin is in a first position, and for allowing the knuckle to transition to the open state when the locking pin is in a second position; and an actuator wire coupled to the body member and the locking pin. In operation, the alloy actuator wire contracts in length when an electrical signal is supplied thereto such that the locking pin is transitioned to the second position when said electrical signal is supplied to the actuator wire.
The coupler of the present invention provides important advantages over the prior art couplers. Most importantly, the coupler provides for substantial scale accuracy with regard to both size and shape of the coupler, and allows for remote operation of the coupler at any location of the rail system without requiring manual intervention by the operator (i.e., without requiring the operator to physically engage the car being uncoupled).
Another advantage of the coupler of the present invention is that it allows for single-handed release of the car (i.e., coupler) connected to the coupler. In other words, activation of the coupler of the present invention allows the coupler of the present invention to be unilaterally released from standard prior art couplers, such as for example, Kadee #5 (HO non-scale) or #58 (HO scale) coupler.
Yet another advantage is that the design of the coupler of the present invention provides for reliable operation, while simultaneously being electrically efficient and cost effective.
Additional advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
The invention itself, together with further objects and advantages, can be better understood by reference to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
a illustrates a first exemplary embodiment of the coupler 100 of the present invention in the open state.
b illustrates the first exemplary embodiment of the coupler 100 of the present invention in the closed state.
a and 2b illustrate an exemplary embodiment of the knuckle contained in the coupler illustrated in
a illustrates an exploded view of an exemplary embodiment of the locking pin contained in the coupler of
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein: rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art; like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
a and 1b illustrate a first exemplary embodiment of the coupler 100 of the present invention.
Referring to
In the given embodiment, the knuckle 32 also includes an opening or slot 32d which allows the knuckle 32 to move relative to coupler guide 34, which is fixed to the body member 30. In other words, referring to
As is clear from the foregoing and
As will be explained in further detail below, the locking pin 36 is spring-biased so as to urge the locking pin 36 into the closed position in which the knuckle 32 is closed. When positioned in the closed state, referring to
The other end of the memory actuator wire 19 is connected to the locking pin 36. In operation, when an electric pulse of the appropriate magnitude is applied to the memory actuator wire 19, the length of the wire 19 physically shortens. As the memory actuator wire 19 is connected to the locking pin 36, when the memory actuator wire 19 shortens in response to the electric signal, the locking pin 19 is pulled back away from the base section 32b of the knuckle 32, thereby allowing the knuckle 32 to transition to the open position. As noted above, when the knuckle 32 is in the open position, the coupler 100 will release the opposing coupler to which it was connected. Thus, the coupler 100 allows for single-handed release (only coupler 100 needs to be placed in the open position to allow separation of the two couplers).
As noted, the coupler 100 utilizes a shape memory alloy actuator wire 19 in the design. A specific brand of this wire is called Flexinol® and is manufactured by Dynalloy, Inc. Flexinol®, or “muscle wire” as it is commonly referred to, uses thermal contraction properties that occur naturally when electrical current is applied. Made of nickel-titanium these small diameter wires contract like muscles when electrically driven. This ability to flex or shorten is a characteristic of certain alloys that dynamically change their internal structure at certain temperatures. The alloy wires contract by several percent of their length when heated and can then be easily stretched out again as the wires cool back to room temperature. Both heating and cooling can occur quite quickly. It is noted that any other wire exhibiting the same properties may also be utilized.
The properties of the “muscle” wire make it ideal for remote electrical actuation of couplers. Further, as the wires are available with diameters as small as 0.001″, it is possible to integrate the wire into coupler designs while maintaining scale proportions. In the given embodiment, the shape memory actuator wire 19 is approximately 1 cm long, and as noted above is attached to the locking pin 36 on one end and secured to a tubular member 11 at the other end. The lead wire 22 allows for application of a current and/or voltage signal to the memory actuator wire 19. Completion of the electrical circuit occurs through the die-cast metal coupler arm via the locking pin 36. As noted above, when the electrical signal is applied, the memory actuator wire 19 contracts thus pulling the locking pin 36 and releasing the spring loaded knuckle 32, thereby placing the knuckle 32 in the open position.
In an alternative embodiment, the length of memory actuator wire is made slightly more than twice the length of the memory actuator wire 19 in the foregoing embodiment, and the memory actuator wire is formed into a “U” shape where connected to the locking pin 36. In this design, electrical current can be applied via two separate wires attached to either end of the memory actuator wire 19. The benefit of this embodiment is it provides for twice the pulling force for the same amount of energy input. In other words, the pulling force is doubled by having two wires pulling the locking pin 36 in parallel. It is noted that this dual wire approach consumes more space in the coupler body member 30 as well as necessitating two wires be attached to the coupler. This design may be preferred in larger scale applications or where the coupler arm and body are plastic, as in G scale.
Referring to
Referring again to
With regard to operation and supplying of a control signal (i.e., electrical signal) to the coupler 100 to open the knuckle, as noted, the signal is supplied to the coupler 100 via lead wire 22. The voltage level and duration of the control signal necessary to contract the memory actuator wire 19 and pull back the locking pin 36 a sufficient distance so as to release the locking pin 36 depends on the length and diameter of the wire, and can be readily determined once these variables are defined for the given design. However, typical values of the control signal for use in the coupler would be a pulsed signal having a duration in the range of 100 msec. to 1 sec.; a voltage level in the range of 1.0-5.0 volts, and a current in the range of 0.25-1.0 amps.
The coupler of the present invention provides important advantages over the prior art couplers. Most importantly, the coupler provides for substantial scale accuracy with regard to both size and shape of the coupler, and allows for remote operation of the coupler at any location on the rail system without requiring manual intervention by the operator (i.e., without requiring the operator to physically engage the car being uncoupled).
Another advantage of the coupler of the present invention is that it allows for single-handed release of the car connected to the coupler. In other words, activation of the coupler of the present invention allows the coupler of the present invention to unilaterally release from standard prior art couplers. Typically, model trains also include control of lights, sounds, smoke, motor speed, and a variety of other features. As such, the generation of a control signal that can be supplied to the coupler via the lead wire 22 can readily be made integral with an overall operating system on-board the model train so as to allow the operator open the coupler by simply pressing a single button or programming the control signal to deliver the necessary control signal to the lead wire 22.
Another advantage associated with the present invention is low power operation. Model train layouts are generally powered by transformers with limited output power. In fact, the maximum power output capability is limited by UL and/or CPSC safety regulations. Therefore, power budgets are carefully conserved as operators desire to operate a maximum number of trains and accessories with the minimum wattage power supplies. In the case of the model itself, many include lights, sounds, and smoke, in addition to the fundamental motor drive mechanism. Wherever power can be conserved is a value. The coupler of present invention utilizes less than 10% of the power required to operate traditional coil coupler designs, thereby making the coupler more efficient and cost effective.
Yet another advantage associated with the highly efficient design of the present invention is the ability to operate the coupler at low voltage levels. In most instances, the speed of the model train is determined by the voltage level applied to the track. As voltage is increased, the vehicle moves faster and likewise, as voltage is lowered, the vehicle slows down. A much sought after operating characteristic of model trains is slow speed operation. Prototypically, real trains uncouple cars at very low speeds. When translated to the model train environment, this means low track voltage. The ability for the present invention to operate reliably at low track voltage is a significant advantage over historical remote operating coupler designs requiring high track voltage to energize a solenoid.
Another advantage associated with the present invention is the transferability of the design to alternate scales of model trains and/or other applications within the realm of model railroading. In terms of transferability of the coupler design to other scales, the coupler of the present invention can be scaled up or down to suit the needs of all scales of model trains.
Yet another advantage associated with the coupler is that it provides for “impact closure.” Simply stated, this means that if the coupler is open, contacting another coupler aligned on the track will cause the knuckle to close and latch. Thus, the coupler provides the model railroader the means of remotely releasing cars as well as connecting to them in a very prototypical fashion. Upon impact, the knuckle contacts the mating coupler first. The contact causes the knuckle to pivot closed. When in the closed position, the spring loaded locking pin automatically engages and locks the knuckle in the closed position. The coupler of the present invention also allows for a delayed uncoupling operation.
Another advantage of the present invention as already noted is that it provides for single sided release. This is especially advantageous for HO-scale model trains. Prior to the instant invention, in coupler designs commonly found in the HO market, it is necessary to release both couplers to attain separation of two vehicles. In other words, opening only one coupler does not necessarily accomplish the objective of disconnecting two vehicles. In contrast, the coupler of the present invention allows for single-sided release.
Although certain specific embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed, it is noted that the present invention may be embodied in other forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3408769 | Max | Nov 1968 | A |
3518790 | Zamarra | Jul 1970 | A |
3605332 | Stepek | Sep 1971 | A |
3662489 | Terrier | May 1972 | A |
3822501 | Ade | Jul 1974 | A |
3840127 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3850310 | Osthall | Nov 1974 | A |
3884360 | Ernst | May 1975 | A |
3939989 | Thomson | Feb 1976 | A |
4098411 | Rossler | Jul 1978 | A |
4195742 | Yumoto | Apr 1980 | A |
4335820 | Gramera | Jun 1982 | A |
4512483 | Crossley et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4650081 | Diller | Mar 1987 | A |
4700855 | Boeniger | Oct 1987 | A |
4765496 | Diller | Aug 1988 | A |
4768663 | Schuller | Sep 1988 | A |
4893716 | Diller | Jan 1990 | A |
5316158 | Dunham et al. | May 1994 | A |
5423439 | Richter | Jun 1995 | A |
5509546 | Staat | Apr 1996 | A |
5620106 | Storzek | Apr 1997 | A |
5662229 | Edwards | Sep 1997 | A |
5678789 | Pipich | Oct 1997 | A |
5681202 | Sander | Oct 1997 | A |
5775524 | Dunham | Jul 1998 | A |
5785192 | Dunham et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5823371 | Riley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826736 | Weber | Oct 1998 | A |
5931322 | Storzek | Aug 1999 | A |
6095351 | Roessler | Aug 2000 | A |
6189713 | Oh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6308845 | Sergent, IV | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6604641 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
RE38990 | Staat | Feb 2006 | E |
6994224 | Barger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20050167386 | Barger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060102579 | Weaver et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070084818 | Brabb et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080271470 | Cheetham et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090014402 | Wolf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0609516 | Aug 1994 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090014402 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |