This invention relates to electro-optic display apparatuses, more particularly, to display backplanes that include thin-film transistor arrays.
Particle-based electrophoretic displays have been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years. In such displays, a plurality of charged particles (sometimes referred to as pigment particles) move through a fluid under the influence of an electric field. The electric field is typically provided by a conductive film or a transistor, such as a field-effect transistor. Electrophoretic displays have good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays. Such electrophoretic displays have slower switching speeds than LCD displays, however, and electrophoretic displays are typically too slow to display real-time video. Additionally, the electrophoretic displays can be sluggish at low temperatures because the viscosity of the fluid limits the movement of the electrophoretic particles. Despite these shortcomings, electrophoretic displays can be found in everyday products such as electronic books (e-readers), mobile phones and mobile phone covers, smart cards, signs, watches, shelf labels, and flash drives.
Many commercial electrophoretic media essentially display only two colors, with a gradient between the black and white extremes, known as “grayscale.” Such electrophoretic media either use a single type of electrophoretic particle having a first color in a colored fluid having a second, different color (in which case, the first color is displayed when the particles lie adjacent the viewing surface of the display and the second color is displayed when the particles are spaced from the viewing surface), or first and second types of electrophoretic particles having differing first and second colors in an uncolored fluid. In the latter case, the first color is displayed when the first type of particles lie adjacent the viewing surface of the display and the second color is displayed when the second type of particles lie adjacent the viewing surface). Typically the two colors are black and white.
Although seemingly simple, electrophoretic media and electrophoretic devices display complex behaviors. For instance, it has been discovered that simple “on/off” voltage pulses are insufficient to achieve high-quality text in electronic readers. Rather, complicated “waveforms” are needed to drive the particles between states and to assure that the new displayed text does not retain a memory of the previous text, i.e., a “ghost.”
This invention provides an electro-optic display having spaced first and second device layers, and a first and second rows of display pixels, each row comprising a plurality of display pixels, each display pixel having an pixel electrode positioned on the first device layer for driving the display pixel, a conduction line positioned on the second device layer and overlapping with a portion of the plurality of display pixels' pixel electrodes; and at least one conductive path connecting the conduction line of the first row to a conduction line of the second row of display pixels.
As indicated above, the subject matter presented herein provides methods and means to reduce capacitance couplings and improves electro-optic display performances.
The term “electro-optic” as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.
The term “gray state” is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, and does not necessarily imply a black-white transition between these two extreme states. For example, several of the E Ink patents and published applications referred to below describe electrophoretic displays in which the extreme states are white and deep blue, so that an intermediate “gray state” would actually be pale blue. Indeed, as already mentioned, the change in optical state may not be a color change at all. The terms “black” and “white” may be used hereinafter to refer to the two extreme optical states of a display, and should be understood as normally including extreme optical states which are not strictly black and white, for example the aforementioned white and dark blue states. The term “monochrome” may be used hereinafter to denote a drive scheme which only drives pixels to their two extreme optical states with no intervening gray states.
The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in published US Patent Application No. 2002/0180687 (see also the corresponding International Application Publication No. WO 02/079869) that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called “multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term “bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.
The term “impulse” is used herein in its conventional meaning of the integral of voltage with respect to time. However, some bistable electro-optic media act as charge transducers, and with such media an alternative definition of impulse, namely the integral of current over time (which is equal to the total charge applied) may be used. The appropriate definition of impulse should be used, depending on whether the medium acts as a voltage-time impulse transducer or a charge impulse transducer.
Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation have recently been published describing encapsulated electrophoretic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles suspended in a liquid suspension medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. The technologies described in these patents and applications include:
(a) Electrophoretic particles, fluids and fluid additives; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,002,728 and 7,679,814;
(b) Capsules, binders and encapsulation processes; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,922,276 and 7,411,719;
(c) Microcell structures, wall materials, and methods of forming microcells; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,072,095 and 9,279,906;
(d) Methods for filling and sealing microcells; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,144,942 and 7,715,088;
(e) Films and sub-assemblies containing electro-optic materials; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,178 and 7,839,564;
(f) Backplanes, adhesive layers and other auxiliary layers and methods used in displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. D485,294; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,252,564; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,376,828; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,506,438; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,535,197; 6,545,291; 6,639,578; 6,657,772; 6,664,944; 6,680,725; 6,683,333; 6,724,519; 6,750,473; 6,816,147; 6,819,471; 6,825,068; 6,831,769; 6,842,167; 6,842,279; 6,842,657; 6,865,010; 6,873,452; 6,909,532; 6,967,640; 6,980,196; 7,012,735; 7,030,412; 7,075,703; 7,106,296; 7,110,163; 7,116,318; 7,148,128; 7,167,155; 7,173,752; 7,176,880; 7,190,008; 7,206,119; 7,223,672; 7,230,751; 7,256,766; 7,259,744; 7,280,094; 7,301,693; 7,304,780; 7,327,511; 7,347,957; 7,349,148; 7,352,353; 7,365,394; 7,365,733; 7,382,363; 7,388,572; 7,401,758; 7,442,587; 7,492,497; 7,535,624; 7,551,346; 7,554,712; 7,583,427; 7,598,173; 7,605,799; 7,636,191; 7,649,674; 7,667,886; 7,672,040; 7,688,497; 7,733,335; 7,785,988; 7,830,592; 7,843,626; 7,859,637; 7,880,958; 7,893,435; 7,898,717; 7,905,977; 7,957,053; 7,986,450; 8,009,344; 8,027,081; 8,049,947; 8,072,675; 8,077,141; 8,089,453; 8,120,836; 8,159,636; 8,208,193; 8,237,892; 8,238,021; 8,362,488; 8,373,211; 8,389,381; 8,395,836; 8,437,069; 8,441,414; 8,456,589; 8,498,042; 8,514,168; 8,547,628; 8,576,162; 8,610,988; 8,714,780; 8,728,266; 8,743,077; 8,754,859; 8,797,258; 8,797,633; 8,797,636; 8,830,560; 8,891,155; 8,969,886; 9,147,364; 9,025,234; 9,025,238; 9,030,374; 9,140,952; 9,152,003; 9,152,004; 9,201,279; 9,223,164; 9,285,648; and 9,310,661; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0060321; 2004/0008179; 2004/0085619; 2004/0105036; 2004/0112525; 2005/0122306; 2005/0122563; 2006/0215106; 2006/0255322; 2007/0052757; 2007/0097489; 2007/0109219; 2008/0061300; 2008/0149271; 2009/0122389; 2009/0315044; 2010/0177396; 2011/0140744; 2011/0187683; 2011/0187689; 2011/0292319; 2013/0250397; 2013/0278900; 2014/0078024; 2014/0139501; 2014/0192000; 2014/0210701; 2014/0300837; 2014/0368753; 2014/0376164; 2015/0171112; 2015/0205178; 2015/0226986; 2015/0227018; 2015/0228666; 2015/0261057; 2015/0356927; 2015/0378235; 2016/077375; 2016/0103380; and 2016/0187759; and International Application Publication No. WO 00/38000; European Patents Nos. 1,099,207 B1 and 1,145,072 B1;
(g) Color formation and color adjustment; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,075,502 and 7,839,564;
(h) Methods for driving displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,012,600 and 7,453,445;
(i) Applications of displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,312,784 and 8,009,348;
(j) Non-electrophoretic displays, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,241,921; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication No. 2015/0277160; and U.S. Patent Application Publications Nos. 2015/0005720 and 2016/0012710.
All of the above patents and patent applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium could be replaced by a continuous phase, thus producing a so-called polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display in which the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of a polymeric material, and that the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display may be regarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsule membrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example, the aforementioned 2002/0131147. Accordingly, for purposes of the present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic media are regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.
An encapsulated electrophoretic display typically does not suffer from the clustering and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoretic devices and provides further advantages, such as the ability to print or coat the display on a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates. (Use of the word “printing” is intended to include all forms of printing and coating, including, but without limitation: pre-metered coatings such as patch die coating, slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascade coating, curtain coating; roll coating such as knife over roll coating, forward and reverse roll coating; gravure coating; dip coating; spray coating; meniscus coating; spin coating; brush coating; air knife coating; silk screen printing processes; electrostatic printing processes; thermal printing processes; inkjet printing processes; and other similar techniques.) Thus, the resulting display can be flexible. Further, because the display medium can be printed (using a variety of methods), the display itself can be made inexpensively.
A related type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcell electrophoretic display”. In a microcell electrophoretic display, the charged particles and the suspending fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium, typically a polymeric film. See, for example, International Application Publication No. WO 02/01281, and published U.S. Application No. 2002/0075556, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, Inc.
The aforementioned types of electro-optic displays are bistable and are typically used in a reflective mode, although as described in certain of the aforementioned patents and applications, such displays may be operated in a “shutter mode” in which the electro-optic medium is used to modulate the transmission of light, so that the display operates in a transmissive mode. Liquid crystals, including polymer-dispersed liquid crystals, are, of course, also electro-optic media, but are typically not bistable and operate in a transmissive mode. Certain embodiments of the invention described below are confined to use with reflective displays, while others may be used with both reflective and transmissive displays, including conventional liquid crystal displays.
Whether a display is reflective or transmissive, and whether or not the electro-optic medium used is bistable, to obtain a high-resolution display, individual pixels of a display must be addressable without interference from adjacent pixels. One way to achieve this objective is to provide an array of non-linear elements, such as transistors or diodes, with at least one non-linear element associated with each pixel, to produce an “active matrix” display. An addressing or pixel electrode, which addresses one pixel, is connected to an appropriate voltage source through the associated non-linear element. Typically, when the non-linear element is a transistor, the pixel electrode is connected to the drain of the transistor, and this arrangement will be assumed in the following description, although it is essentially arbitrary and the pixel electrode could be connected to the source of the transistor. Conventionally, in high resolution arrays, the pixels are arranged in a two-dimensional array of rows and columns, such that any specific pixel is uniquely defined by the intersection of one specified row and one specified column. The sources of all the transistors in each column are connected to a single column electrode, while the gates of all the transistors in each row are connected to a single row electrode; again the assignment of sources to rows and gates to columns is conventional but essentially arbitrary, and could be reversed if desired. The row electrodes are connected to a row driver, which essentially ensures that at any given moment only one row is selected, i.e., that there is applied to the selected row electrode a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in the selected row are conductive, while there is applied to all other rows a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in these non-selected rows remain non-conductive. The column electrodes are connected to column drivers, which place upon the various column electrodes voltages selected to drive the pixels in the selected row to their desired optical states. (The aforementioned voltages are relative to a common front electrode which is conventionally provided on the opposed side of the electro-optic medium from the non-linear array and extends across the whole display.) After a pre-selected interval known as the “line address time” the selected row is deselected, the next row is selected, and the voltages on the column drivers are changed to that the next line of the display is written. This process is repeated so that the entire display is written in a row-by-row manner.
Processes for manufacturing active matrix displays are well established. Thin-film transistors, for example, can be fabricated using various deposition and photolithography techniques. A transistor includes a gate electrode, an insulating dielectric layer, a semiconductor layer and source and drain electrodes. Application of a voltage to the gate electrode provides an electric field across the dielectric layer, which dramatically increases the source-to-drain conductivity of the semiconductor layer. This change permits electrical conduction between the source and the drain electrodes. Typically, the gate electrode, the source electrode, and the drain electrode are patterned. In general, the semiconductor layer is also patterned in order to minimize stray conduction (i.e., cross-talk) between neighboring circuit elements.
Liquid crystal displays commonly employ amorphous silicon (“a-Si”), thin-film transistors (“TFT's”) as switching devices for display pixels. Such TFT's typically have a bottom-gate configuration. Within one pixel, a thin film capacitor typically holds a charge transferred by the switching TFT. Electrophoretic displays can use similar TFT's with capacitors, although the function of the capacitors differs somewhat from those in liquid crystal displays; see the aforementioned copending application Ser. No. 09/565,413, and Publications 2002/0106847 and 2002/0060321. Thin film transistors can be fabricated to provide high performance. Fabrication processes, however, can result in significant cost.
In TFT addressing arrays, pixel electrodes are charged via the TFT's during a line address time. During the line address time, a TFT is switched to a conducting state by changing an applied gate voltage. For example, for an n-type TFT, a gate voltage is switched to a “high” state to switch the TFT into a conducting state.
Furthermore, unwanted effect such as voltage shifts may be caused by crosstalk occurring between a data line supplying driving waveforms to the display pixel and the pixel electrode. Similar to the voltage shift described above, crosstalk between the data line and the pixel electrode can be caused by capacitive coupling between the two even when the display pixel is not being addressed (e.g., associated pixel TFT in depletion). Such crosstalk can result in voltage shifts that are undesirable because it can lead to optical artifacts such as image streaking.
In some embodiments, an electrophoretic display or EPD 100 may include two substrates (e.g., plastic or glass) where a front plane laminate or FPL is positioned between the two substrates. In some embodiments, the bottom portion of the top substrate may be coated with a transparent conductive material to function as a conductive electrode (i.e., the VCOM plane). The top portion of the lower substrate may include an array of electrode elements (e.g., conductive electrodes for each display pixels). A semiconductor switch, such as a thin film transistor or TFT, may be associated with each of these pixel electrodes. Application of a bias voltage to a pixel electrode and the VCOM plane may result in an electro-optical transformation of the FPL. This optical transformation can be used as a basis for the display of text or graphical information on the EPD. To display a desired image, a proper voltage needs to be applied to each pixel electrode. To achieve that, each TFT 102 may be provided with a gate line signal, a data line signal, VCOM line signal and a storage capacitor. In one embodiment, as illustrated in
EPD Operation and Crosstalk
In operation, driving signals (e.g., voltage pulses) are applied to each data lines for updating the display pixels. To select which display pixels to be updated, the scan lines (e.g., scan line 104) may be selectively activated so that the driving signals from the data lines (e.g., data line 106) may be applied to the pixel electrodes to update the corresponding display pixels. In some embodiments, each scan line may be activated sequentially until all the display pixels of the EPD 100 are updated. In this updating process, the VCOM signal could be disturbed or deviated from an intended level by undesired capacitance coupling effects.
Referring now to
In operation, the VCOM voltage value may experience a fluctuation (e.g., a dip in voltage value) when a display pixel is selected (i.e., scan line 308 selects the pixel 310), and driving voltage signals are applied through the data line 304, thereby causing changes in voltage values at the data line 304. In this case, affected by some of the above mentioned capacitive effects, the VCOM voltage value may deviate from a target value (e.g., +15, −15, or 0V). If the VCOM is not able to return to this target voltage value when the scan line 308 is turned off (i.e., putting the selected display pixel in a floating state). As a result, the voltage level of the selected pixel electrode will shift from the target value roughly to the amount estimated below, which can lead to an observable band along VCOM line direction. The shift of pixel voltage (ΔVPIXEL) may be calculated using the principle of charge conservation:
Where ΔVCOM is the resulting voltage shift in VCOM value when a scan line is turned off, Ctotal is the total capacitance of pixel electrode, and Ctotal may include, in addition to the capacitance coupling effects mentioned above, also capacitance coupling effects that may arise between any of the metal layers and material layers.
This shift of pixel voltage (ΔVPIXEL) may sometimes be referred to as crosstalk or streaking. One way to mitigate these unwanted effects may be to decrease the RC delay of VCOM signal to ensure that the VCOM value returns to the targeted value or level during the activation of the scan line.
For reducing the RC delay mentioned above to ensure a fast V level recovery, a new design of a display backplane is presented in
Referring now to
In practice, an EPD may have two adjacent rows of display pixels, where each row may include a plurality of display pixels, and each display pixel having a pixel electrode for driving the display pixel. And each row may also have a first signal line connected to each of the pixel electrodes of the plurality of display pixels, and at least one conductive path connecting the first signal line of the first row to a second signal line of the second row of display pixels. Or as illustrated in
In another embodiment, as described in
From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention can provide a backplane for reducing cross-talks and display pixel voltage shifts. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made in the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/678,323, filed Nov. 8, 2019 (Publication No. 2020-0152140; now U.S. Pat. No. 11,145,262), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/757,818 filed on Nov. 9, 2018. The entire disclosures of the aforementioned applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6124851 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6130773 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6177921 | Comiskey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6232950 | Albert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241921 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252564 | Albert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6312304 | Duthaler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6376828 | Comiskey | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392786 | Albert | May 2002 | B1 |
6413790 | Duthaler et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422687 | Jacobson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445374 | Albert et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6480182 | Turner et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6498114 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506438 | Duthaler et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512505 | Uchino et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518949 | Drzaic | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521489 | Duthaler et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535197 | Comiskey et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545291 | Amundson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6639578 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657772 | Loxley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664944 | Albert et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
D485294 | Albert | Jan 2004 | S |
6672921 | Liang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680725 | Jacobson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683333 | Kazlas et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6724519 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6750473 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6788449 | Liang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816147 | Albert | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819471 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825068 | Denis et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831769 | Holman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842167 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842279 | Amundson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842657 | Drzaic et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6865010 | Duthaler et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866760 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873452 | Tseng et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6909532 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922276 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6967640 | Albert et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980196 | Turner et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002728 | Pullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012600 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012735 | Honeyman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7030412 | Drzaic et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7072095 | Liang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075502 | Drzaic et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7075703 | O'Neil et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7106296 | Jacobson | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110163 | Webber et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116318 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144942 | Zang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148128 | Jacobson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167155 | Albert et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7170670 | Webber | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173752 | Doshi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176880 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190008 | Amundson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206119 | Honeyman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223672 | Kazlas et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7230751 | Whitesides et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256766 | Albert et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259744 | Arango et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280094 | Albert | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301693 | Chaug et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304780 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312784 | Baucom et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327346 | Chung et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7327511 | Whitesides et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347957 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349148 | Doshi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352353 | Albert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365394 | Denis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365733 | Duthaler et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7382363 | Albert et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388572 | Duthaler et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401758 | Liang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411719 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7442587 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453445 | Amundson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7492497 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7535624 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7551346 | Fazel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554712 | Patry et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560004 | Pereira et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7583427 | Danner et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598173 | Ritenour et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605799 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7636191 | Duthaler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7649674 | Danner et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667886 | Danner et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672040 | Sohn et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7679814 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688497 | Danner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715088 | Liang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733335 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7785988 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7830592 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7839564 | Whitesides et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843626 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7859637 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880958 | Zang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893435 | Kazlas et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898717 | Patry et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905977 | Qi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7957053 | Honeyman et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7986450 | Cao et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
3009344 | Danner et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
8009348 | Zehner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
3027081 | Danner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
8018428 | Jung et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8049947 | Danner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072675 | Lin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077141 | Duthaler et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8089453 | Comiskey et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115205 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120836 | Lin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8159636 | Sun et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8208193 | Patry et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8237892 | Sprague et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8238021 | Sprague et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264454 | Kim et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8362488 | Chaug et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373211 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8389381 | Amundson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395836 | Lin | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8437069 | Lin | May 2013 | B2 |
8441414 | Lin | May 2013 | B2 |
8456589 | Sprague et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8498042 | Danner et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8514168 | Chung et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8547628 | Wu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576162 | Kang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8610988 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8614654 | Lee et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8633889 | Umezaki | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8714780 | Ho et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8728266 | Danner et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8743077 | Sprague | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8754859 | Gates et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8773398 | Funo et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797258 | Sprague | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8797633 | Sprague et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8797636 | Yang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830560 | Danner et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8891155 | Danner et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8969886 | Amundson | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9025234 | Lin | May 2015 | B2 |
9025238 | Chan et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9030374 | Sprague et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9140952 | Sprague et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147364 | Wu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152003 | Danner et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9152004 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9201279 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9223164 | Lai et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9279906 | Kang | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9285648 | Liu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9310661 | Wu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9335870 | Yousekpor et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9406266 | Park et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9419024 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9454057 | Wu et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9529240 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9582041 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9620066 | Bishop | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632373 | Huang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9666142 | Hung | May 2017 | B2 |
9671635 | Paolini, Jr. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9778500 | Gates et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9841653 | Wu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10037735 | Amundson | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10048563 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10048564 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10190743 | Hertel et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10444553 | Laxton | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446585 | Harris et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10466564 | Kayal et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10613407 | Lin et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
11145262 | Ho | Oct 2021 | B2 |
20020060321 | Kazlas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040085619 | Wu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105036 | Danner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050122306 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122563 | Honeyman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060255322 | Wu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070052757 | Jacobson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070057905 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090122389 | Whitesides et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090315044 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100177396 | Lin | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110140744 | Kazlas et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110187683 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110292319 | Cole | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120218242 | Ho et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140078024 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140192000 | Hung et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210701 | Wu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150005720 | Zang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160012710 | Lu et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018710 | Chai | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160077375 | Lin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104020881 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104280969 | Jan 2015 | CN |
2008233149 | Oct 2008 | JP |
1999067678 | Dec 1999 | WO |
2000005704 | Feb 2000 | WO |
2000038000 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2019/060470, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 9, 2020. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, EP Appl. No. 19882567.1, dated Jun. 24, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220028347 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62757818 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16678323 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 17496749 | US |