Copper damascene is the most common technique used to produce interconnects for ULSI circuits. To meet the challenges of continuing increase of device speed and shrinkage of device dimensions, one of the strategies used is to use ultra low dielectric constant (k) materials as interlayer dielectrics (ILDs) between layers of copper interconnects. Unfortunately, these low-k ILDs are too soft to be integrated with conventional chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) technique.
We, and others, have suggested an alternative polishing technique, electrochemical polishing (ECP) as a replacement of CMP:
There are several challenges for ECP of copper films electroplated on patterned silicon wafers. Gentle surface undulation of the copper film needs to be satisfactorily planarized. Also, macro-uniformity over the entire surface of the wafer, such as a 12″ wafer, should be satisfactory, such as the lack of “islands” (discrete, highly raised portions on the wafer). Moreover, the ECP endpoint needs to be satisfactorily detected and controlled. In other words, one does not want to over or under-planarize the wafer.
ECP can proceed through ohmic, migration and/or diffusion leveling mechanisms. The ohmic leveling mechanism is insignificant under mass-transport limited conditions, which are required in practice to avoid etching along grain boundaries. Migration leveling is relevant when the mass transport limiting species are ions, whereas diffusion leveling is relevant when the mass-transport-limiting species are molecules or ions. The efficiency of migration leveling and diffusion leveling effects both depend on the original geometrical profile of the anode surface to be polished. Sharp points on the surface are evened out faster than blunter features. This is not a problem in most conventional electropolishing applications, where the surface undulations are relatively insignificant and electropolishing is a final step intended to remove sharp, jagged features in order to provide a planar surface. However, in semiconductor manufacturing electropolishing is used to remove relatively gentle undulations that result from previous processing steps, e.g. overfilling of vias and trenches in copper electroplating. Thus the application of copper electropolishing to semiconductor manufacturing requires a different approach from that used in conventional applications.
It is known that ECP is strongly dependent on the surface profiles of the anode to be planarized (J. Huo, “Electrochemical planarization of copper for microelectronic application”, doctoral dissertation, (Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oreg., February, 2004). One can consider the surfaces of copper films electroplated on patterned silicon wafers to be composed of long wavelength of sine waves, which are difficult to planarize. We have previously suggested that a satisfactory ECP effect in this case requires the formation of anodic layer(s):
However, it is very challenging to detect and control the surface profile of an anodic layer. We have previously suggested that ECP can also be produced using ohmic leveling under dynamic condition, which is negligible under conventional ECP conditions:
Thus, those skilled in the art will appreciate a need to addresses the issues that limit ECP.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a system and method for performing ECP that satisfactorily achieves macro-uniform planarization (such as the lack of “islands”), over the entire surface of an anode.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a system and method for performing ECP that satisfactorily achieves planarization of gentle surface undulations of the metal coating on the semiconductor wafer resulting from previous processing steps, such as overfilled vias and trenches, i.e., patterned wafers.
The aforesaid objects are achieved individually and/or in combination, and it is not intended that the present invention be construed as requiring two or more of the objects to be combined unless expressly required by the claims attached hereto.
According to the present invention, a system for performing electrochemical planarization of a surface of an anode includes: a means for retaining the anode; a cathode disposed parallel to the anode; a reservoir for containing an electrolyte composition and being operatively associated with said means for retaining and with the cathode; a means for providing a voltage between the anode and the cathode; and a means for rotating one of the anode and the cathode, the cathode having a surface facing the means for retaining, said surface being configured such that the surface does not extend over all of the anode surface to be planarized. Preferably, the anode is a patterned or unpatterned semiconductor wafer with electroplated metal thereon, such as copper.
According to the invention, a method for performing electrochemical planarization of an anode surface includes the following steps. An electrochemical planarization system is provided that includes: 1) a means for retaining the anode; 2) a cathode disposed parallel to the anode; 3) a reservoir for containing an electrolyte composition; 4) a means for rotating either the anode or cathode; and 5) a means for providing a voltage between the anode and the cathode. The reservoir is operative associated with the means for retaining, the means for rotating, and the cathode. The cathode has a surface facing the anode and is configured such that the surface does not extend over all of the anode surface to be planarized when the anode is retained by the means for retaining and rotating. An electrolyte composition is provided within the reservoir.
The anode is retained and one of the anode and cathode is rotated with the means for rotating. A voltage is applied to the anode and the cathode with the means for providing. Electrochemical planarization of the anode surface is allowed to occur until a desired degree of planarization is achieved. Preferably, the anode is a patterned or unpatterned semiconductor wafer with electroplated metal thereon, such as copper.
For a further understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like elements are given the same or analogous reference numbers and wherein:
a illustrates a schematic of one embodiment of the system of the invention.
b illustrates a schematic of one embodiment of the system of the invention.
a illustrates copper anodic polarization curves produced by Examples 1-3 and Comparative Example 1.
b illustrates copper anodic polarization curves produced by 5 & 6 and Comparative Example 2.
c illustrates Levich-Koutecky plots of steady-state data obtained from Examples 1 & 4.
a is an image of the planarized anode surface obtained from Comparative Example 3.
b is an image of the planarized anode surface obtained from Example 7.
c is a cross-sectional SEM image of the planarized anode of Comparative Example 4.
d is a cross-sectional SEM image of the planarized anode of Example 8.
As best illustrated in
As best shown in the planar top views of
As best shown in the planar, top view of
Referring to
The thickness of such a cathode 12 is similarly dependent upon the material used for the cathode 12 and upon the pressure of the electrolyte solution. In other words, a pressure drop from a bottom to a top of the cathode 12, or vice versa, for a thicker cathode 12 will be greater than for a thinner cathode 12. Preferably, the material of the cathode 12, electrolyte solution circulation and the thickness of the cathode 12 are selected such that: 1) a uniform electrolyte solution can be provided on the anode surface to be planarized, and 2) metal ions dissolved from the anode and hydrogen atoms or bubbles produced at the cathode can be flushed away from the electrode.
With respect to all embodiments of the invention, instead of rotating the anode 5 while the cathode 10, 12 is fixed, it is well within the scope of the invention to rotate the cathode 10, 12 while the anode 5 is in fixed position.
Preferably, the anode 5 is a semiconductor wafer. Preferably, it is a patterned semiconductor wafer including vias and/or trenches containing copper.
In a conventional ECP system, a solid circular (360°) metal plate serves as cathode 10, 12. When the interelectrode distance between the anode 5 and the cathode 10, 12 is relatively small, poor ECP uniformity will result over an anode 5 because of poor electrolyte solution circulation. Additionally, hydrogen atoms produced on the cathode 10, 12 will more easily reach the surface of the anode 5 with such a low distance such that they form H2 bubbles thereby causing pits thereupon. These pits cause discontinuity of the metal coating on the anode 5. As a result, islands of metal films will be left on the surface of the anode 5. Thus, for conventional ECP systems it is important to maintain a sufficiently great interelectrode distance D in order to avoid these problems.
In contrast, the inventors have discovered that a relatively low interelectrode distance achieves satisfactory ECP by using the system according to the invention. Because the cathode 10, 12 has a surface that does not extend across the entire area of the portion of the anode 5 to be planarized, the electrolyte solution flow is significantly less impeded as compared to conventional ECP systems. A corollary benefit is that H2 bubbles tend less to cause pits on the anode surface because they tend to be flushed out by the electrolyte solution recirculation.
The benefit of a relatively low interelectrode distance D is as follows. Under conventional conditions (a large interelectrode distance D), we would expect that the contour of the anodic boundary diffusion layer on the anode 5 will follow the contour of the anode 5 itself. Thus, we would expect there to be little tendency to remove gentle surface undulations from the anode 5 because the depletion rate of the metal coating from a “peak” and from a “valley” should be about the same.
We propose that when the inter-electrode distance D is extremely small, i.e. when the electrodes 5, 10, 12 are sufficiently close that the anodic layer is disrupted, the rotating anode 5 forces the anodic layer to be conformal with the cathode 10, 12. That is, the surface of the anodic layer is flat as long as the surface of the cathode 10, 12 is flat. This will especially provide very good planarization of an anode 5 having a gently undulating surface. The mechanism for this effect is explained below.
The thickness of a an anodic layer during rotation of the anode or cathode, considering only diffusion of the anodic metal cations, is:
As best illustrated in
Hence, when the anodic layer is disrupted, such as when a very small interelectrode distance D exists, the shorter distance between the anode 5 and the anodic diffusion layer/electrolyte solution interface at a peak in the surface profile of the anode 5 results in a higher depletion rate than at a valley, and a gently undulating surface is highly planarized in comparison. When the anodic diffusion layer is not disrupted, such as when a very large interelectrode distance exists in convention ECP systems, planarization of a gently undulating surface is unsatisfactorily planarized. This difference is well illustrated in
Preferably, the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 are positioned to yield an interelectrode distance D of less than about 1 mm.
Mathematical analysis suggests that a segment of a disc satisfactorily achieves a highly uniform ECP driving force over the entire surface of the anode 5. As illustrated by
Additionally, two or more of the disc segments of
However, the mathematically ideal segment configuration described above is not essential for practice of the invention. In general, any shape less than a full disc may be used so long as there is satisfactory uniformity of ECP driving force upon each point on the surface of the anode 5, such as in the embodiments illustrated in
An interelectrode distance D of essentially just greater than 0 mm may be achieved by moving the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 towards another until contact is made and then moving them apart, i.e., “backing off”, one of them. It is well within the invention to either hold the anode 5 fixed while the cathode 10, 12 is moved towards it, to hold the cathode 10, 12 fixed while the anode is moved towards it, or to hold neither the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12, but to instead move both of them towards each other.
Positioning the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 to achieve a desired interelectrode distance D may be performed by providing the cathode 10, 12 with a raised portion at some portion thereof, i.e., a “stop”. The stop of course will have a height equal to or less than the lowest desired interelectrode distance D. Upon movement of the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 towards one another, the anode 5 will at some point make contact with the stop. At that time, the interelectrode distance equivalent to stop height is achieved. Otherwise, the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 may be backed off, until the desired interelectrode distance D is achieved. Confirmation of contact may be performed by measuring qualitatively, i.e., moving the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 together until the operator feels resistance at which time the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 may be backed off. It is preferably performed by measuring the force applied to the stop. When the measured force spikes upward, contact has been made. A suitable device for positioning the anode or cathode is the Sub-Micron Adjuster MDT216A, available from Thorlabs, Inc. located in Newton, N.J. 07860.
Positioning the electrodes and cathodes to achieve a desired interelectrode distance D may be performed by detecting a spike in electric current from the cathode 10, 12 to the anode 5. In this manner, one may know that the circuit consisting of the device for applying voltage plus the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 is shorted out. Following confirmation of this contact, the electrical connection may be broken by “backing off” the anode 5 and cathode 10, 12 to the desired interelectrode distance or until the current spike disappears.
The apparatus illustrated in
The anodes were placed in a circular sample holder with a square window at the bottom. Anodic polarization curves were obtained with Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV) with a scan range of 0˜4 V and a scan rate of 5 Mv/sec. A 273A Potentiostat/Galvanostat (Princeton Applied Research) was used to perform the LSV at room temperature.
As shown in
A more stringent criterion for validating mass transport conditions is when the limiting current obeys the Levich equation (R. Alkire and A. Cangellari, J. Electrochem. Soc., 136, 913 (1989)):
where Ao is the area of the anode surface, D is Cu diffusion coefficient, v is kinematic viscosity, Cs−Cb is the concentrations difference of mass transport limiting species between the anode surface and bulk solution. Accordingly, Levich-Koutecky plot (1/iL VS 1/ω1/2) will be a straight line if the process is mass transport controlled. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In contrast and as shown in
Increasing the interelectrode distance can improve solution circulation and thus the macro-uniformity of copper removal for conventional ECP systems. However, planarization of undulating features on a patterned wafer is very poor. The results of Comparative Example 4, as shown in
In contrast, the results of Example 8 as shown in
It will be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps, and arrangement of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the invention, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments in the examples given above and/or the attached drawings.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to provisional application No. 60/558,939 filed Apr. 2, 2004, and provisional application 60/591,493 filed Jul. 27, 2004, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60558939 | Apr 2004 | US | |
60591493 | Jul 2004 | US |