The present invention relates to an electrolyte for a lithium-sulphur cell. The present invention also relates to a lithium-sulphur cell. The present invention further relates to a method of producing a lithium-sulphur cell.
A typical lithium-sulphur cell comprises an anode (negative electrode) formed from lithium metal or a lithium metal alloy, and a cathode (positive electrode) formed from elemental sulphur or other electroactive sulphur material. The sulphur or other electroactive sulphur-containing material may be mixed with an electrically conductive material, such as carbon, to improve its electrical conductivity. Typically, the carbon and sulphur are ground and then mixed with a solvent and binder to form a slurry. The slurry is applied to a current collector and then dried to remove the solvent. The resulting structure is calendared to form a composite structure, which is cut into the desired shape to form a cathode. A separator is placed on the cathode and a lithium anode placed on the separator. Electrolyte is introduced into the cell to wet the cathode and separator.
Lithium-sulphur cells are secondary cells, and may be recharged by applying an external current to the cell. Rechargeable cells of this type have a wide range of potential applications, and one important consideration when developing lithium-sulphur secondary cells is maximising the useful cycle life of the cell.
Advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art with the benefit of the following detailed description of embodiments and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Before particular examples of the present invention are described, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the particular cell, method or material disclosed herein. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is used for describing particular examples only and is not intended to be limiting, as the scope of protection will be defined by the claims and equivalents thereof.
In describing and claiming the cell and method of the present invention, the following terminology will be used: the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an anode” includes reference to one or more of such elements.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electrolyte for a lithium-sulphur cell comprising at least one lithium salt and at least one organic solvent; and a surfactant, wherein the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.5-3 weight %.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a lithium-sulphur cell comprising:
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of producing the claimed lithium-sulphur cell, said method comprising:
incorporating an electrolyte comprising at least one lithium salt, at least one organic solvent, and a surfactant into a cell assembly comprising an anode comprising lithium metal or lithium metal alloy, a cathode comprising a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material, and a porous separator.
Advantageously, it has been found that the electrolyte according to the present invention increases the charge and discharge capacity of a lithium sulphur cell. It is believed that the surfactant in the electrolyte according to the present invention provides increased wettability of both the separator and the cathode. This results in an increase in cell capacity and improved rate and cycle properties, such as cycle life, of the cell.
While separators with a surfactant coating are commercially available, it has been found that the use of the electrolyte of the present invention provides improved cycle life and also allows not only a wide range of separators to be used, but allows the use of suitable surfactants in their optimum conditions.
It has also been found that, when surfactant is present in the electrolyte, the electrolyte advantageously soaks into the cathode more readily, wetting the cathode more effectively. As the electrolyte soaks into the cathode, any air trapped in the mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material is displaced. In the absence of the surfactant, penetration into the cathode may be less effective and, as a result, pockets of air may remain in the cathode structure. The addition of surfactant to the electrolyte is also advantageous in that it prevents or reduces leakage of the electrolyte e.g. during construction of a lithium-sulphur cell, due to said improved penetration and cathode wetting.
As discussed above, according to one aspect of the present invention there is provided an electrolyte for a lithium-sulphur electrochemical cell comprising at least one lithium salt and at least one organic solvent; and a surfactant, wherein the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.5-3 weight %.
Preferably, the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.75-2.25 weight %, more preferably 1.25-1.75 weight %, for example 1.5 weight %.
Preferably, the surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant. Suitable surfactants include long chain alcohols (such as fatty alcohols, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol and olely alcohol); alcohol ethoxylates (eg Tergitol 15-S-5, -7 and -9); polyoxyethylene glycol alkyl ethers (Brij), for example octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether and pentaethylene glycol monododecyl ether; polyoxypropylene glycol alkyl ethers; glucoside alkyl ethers, for example decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside and octyl glucoside; polyoxyethylene glycol octylphenol ethers, for example Triton X-100; polyoxyethylene glycol alkylphenol ethers, for example nonxynol-9; glycerol alkyl esters, for example glyceryl laurate; polyoxyethylene glycol sorbitan alkyl esters, sorbitan alkyl esters, cocamide MEA, cocamide DEA, dodecyldimethylamine oxide, block copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol (poloxamers) and polyethoxy tallow amine (POEA). Preferably, the surfactant does not include fluorine. Preferably, the surfactant is not a fluorine-based surfactant represented by a formula:
wherein R is a hydrogen, an acetyl group, a methyl group, or a benzoyl group; and m and n are integers from 2 to 20.
Preferably, the surfactant is selected from secondary alcohol ethoxylates, tetraethylene glycol dodecyl ethers, silicone glycols, imidazolines, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitates and polyoxyethylene nonyl-phenyl ethers and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the surfactant is an alcohol ethoxylate, a polyethylene glycol alkyl ether (e.g. polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether) or a polyoxytheylene alkyl ether (e.g. polyoxyethylene oleyl ether or polyoxyethylene lauryl ether).
In a preferred embodiment, the surfactant is an alcohol ethoxylate, for example, a secondary alcohol ethoxylate. For example, the secondary alcohol ethoxylate may have the general formula:
C12-14H25-29[CH2CH2O]xH,
where x is an integer of 5 to 9, for example, 5, 7 or 9.
In one embodiment, the surfactant has the formula:
where x is an integer of 5 to 9, for example, 5, 7 or 9, preferably 5. Suitable examples of such surfactants include those sold under the trademark Tergitol 15-S, for example, Tergitol 15-S-5, Tergitol 15-S-7 and Tergitol 15-S-9.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, alcohol ethoxylates (e.g. the secondary alcohol ethoxylates described above) can be used to improve the discharge capacity and/or cycling efficiency of a lithium-sulphur cell. Electrolytes containing such surfactants have been found to be capable of wetting separators formed, for example, of polypropylene and/or polyethylene more effectively. This in turn may improve the electrochemical performance of the cell. In some embodiments, the effect is particularly pronounced when the electrolyte comprises a sulfone solvent, for example, sulfolane. Sulfolane is typically viscous and may not wet the cell's separators effectively. However, when an alcohol ethoxylate is dispersed in a sulfone (e.g. sulfolane) solvent, the wetting capability of the solvent may be significantly improved.
Suitable lithium salts include at least one of lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium trifluoromethanesulfonimide (LiN(CF3SO2)2)), lithium borofluoride, lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate (CF3SO3Li), and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiB(C2O4)2). Preferably the lithium salt is lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate.
Suitable organic solvents for use in the electrolyte are tetrahydrofurane, 2-methyltetrahydrofurane, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate, ethylmethylcarbonate, methylpropylcarbonate, methylpropylpropionate, ethylpropylpropionate, methyl acetate, dimethoxyethane, 1,3-dioxolane, diglyme (2-methoxyethyl ether), tetraglyme, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, γ-butyrolactone, dioxolane, hexamethyl phosphoamide, pyridine, dimethyl sulfoxide, tributyl phosphate, trimethyl phosphate, N,N,N,N-tetraethyl sulfamide, and sulfone and their mixtures. Preferably, the organic solvent is a sulfone or a mixture of sulfones. Examples of sulfones are dimethyl sulfone and sulfolane. Sulfolane may be employed as the sole solvent or in combination, for example, with other sulfones.
The organic solvent used in the electrolyte should be capable of dissolving the polysulphide species, for example, of the formula Sn2−, where n=2 to 12, that are formed when the electroactive sulphur material is reduced during discharge of the cell.
In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate and sulfolane.
The concentration of lithium salt in the electrolyte is preferably 0.1 to 5M, more preferably 0.5 to 3M, for example, 1M. The lithium salt is preferably present at a concentration that is at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, for example, 95 to 99% of saturation.
As discussed above, according to another aspect of the invention there is provided a lithium-sulphur electrochemical cell comprising: an anode comprising lithium metal or lithium metal alloy; a cathode comprising a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material; a porous separator; and an electrolyte comprising at least one lithium salt, at least one organic solvent and a surfactant.
The electrochemical cell of the present invention may be any suitable lithium-sulphur cell. The cell includes an anode, a cathode, an electrolyte and a porous separator, which may advantageously be positioned between the anode and the cathode. The anode is formed of lithium metal or a lithium metal alloy. Preferably, the anode is a metal foil electrode, such as a lithium foil electrode. The lithium foil is formed of lithium metal or lithium metal alloy.
The cathode of the electrochemical cell includes a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material. This mixture forms an electroactive layer, which may be placed in contact with a current collector.
The electroactive sulphur material may comprise elemental sulphur, sulphur-based organic compounds, sulphur-based inorganic compounds and sulphur-containing polymers. Preferably, elemental sulphur is used.
The solid electroconductive material may be any suitable conductive material. Preferably, this solid electroconductive material may be formed of carbon. Examples include carbon black, carbon fibre, graphene and carbon nanotubes. Other suitable materials include metal (e.g. flakes, filings and powders) and conductive polymers. Preferably, carbon black is employed.
The mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material may be applied to the current collector in the form of a slurry in a solvent (e.g. water or an organic solvent). The solvent may then be removed and the resulting structure calendared to form a composite structure, which may be cut into the desired shape to form a cathode. A separator may be placed on the cathode and a lithium anode placed on the separator. Electrolyte may then be incorporated into the assembled cell to wet the cathode and separator.
Alternatively, following the formation of the cathode, the electrolyte may be coated onto the cathode. The separator may then be placed over the coated cathode, and the anode placed over the separator.
As discussed above, the cell comprises an electrolyte. The electrolyte is present or disposed between the electrodes, allowing charge to be transferred between the anode and cathode. Preferably, the electrolyte wets the pores of the cathode as well as the pores of the separator.
The electrolyte comprises at least one lithium salt, at least one organic solvent and a surfactant. Suitable lithium salts include at least one of lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium trifluoromethanesulfonimide (LiN(CF3SO2)2)), lithium borofluoride, lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate (CF3SO3Li), and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiB(C2O4)2). Preferably the lithium salt is lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate.
Suitable organic solvents for use in the electrolyte are tetrahydrofurane, 2-methyltetrahydrofurane, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate, ethylmethylcarbonate, methylpropylcarbonate, methylpropylpropionate, ethylpropylpropionate, methyl acetate, dimethoxyethane, 1,3-dioxolane, diglyme (2-methoxyethyl ether), tetraglyme, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, γ-butyrolactone, dioxolane, hexamethyl phosphoamide, pyridine, dimethyl sulfoxide, tributyl phosphate, trimethyl phosphate, N,N,N,N-tetraethyl sulfamide, and sulfone and their mixtures. Preferably, the organic solvent is a sulfone or a mixture of sulfones. Examples of sulfones are dimethyl sulfone and sulfolane. Sulfolane may be employed as the sole solvent or in combination, for example, with other sulfones.
The organic solvent used in the electrolyte should be capable of dissolving the polysulphide species, for example, of the formula Sn2−, where n=2 to 12, that are formed when the electroactive sulphur material is reduced during discharge of the cell.
In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate and sulfolane.
The concentration of lithium salt in the electrolyte is preferably 0.1 to 5M, more preferably 0.5 to 3M, for example, 1M. The lithium salt is preferably present at a concentration that is at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, for example, 95 to 99% of saturation.
Preferably, the surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant. Suitable surfactants include long chain alcohols (such as fatty alcohols, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol and olely alcohol); alcohol ethoxylates (eg Tergitol 15-S-5, -7 and -9); polyoxyethylene glycol alkyl ethers (Brij), for example octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether and pentaethylene glycol monododecyl ether; polyoxypropylene glycol alkyl ethers; glucoside alkyl ethers, for example decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside and octyl glucoside; polyoxyethylene glycol octylphenol ethers, for example Triton X-100; polyoxyethylene glycol alkylphenol ethers, for example nonxynol-9; glycerol alkyl esters, for example glyceryl laurate; polyoxyethylene glycol sorbitan alkyl esters, sorbitan alkyl esters, cocamide MEA, cocamide DEA, dodecyldimethylamine oxide, block copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol (poloxamers) and polyethoxy tallow amine (POEA). Preferably, the surfactant does not include fluorine. Preferably, the surfactant is not a fluorine-based surfactant represented by a formula:
Wherein R is a hydrogen, an acetyl group, a methyl group, or a benzoyl group; and m and n are integers from 2 to 20.
Preferably, the surfactant is selected from secondary alcohol ethoxylates, tetraethylene glycol dodecyl ethers, silicone glycols, imidazolines, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitates and polyoxyethylene nonyl-phenyl ethers and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the surfactant is an alcohol ethoxylate, a polyethylene glycol alkyl ether (e.g. polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether) or a polyoxytheylene alkyl ether (e.g. polyoxyethylene oleyl ether or polyoxyethylene lauryl ether).
In a preferred embodiment, the surfactant is an alcohol ethoxylate, for example, a secondary alcohol ethoxylate. For example, the secondary alcohol ethoxylate may have the general formula:
C12-14H25-29[CH2CH2O]xH,
where x is an integer of 5 to 9, for example, 5, 7 or 9.
In one embodiment, the surfactant has the formula:
where x is an integer of 5 to 9, for example, 5, 7 or 9, preferably 5. Suitable examples of such surfactants include those sold under the trademark Tergitol 15-S, for example, Tergitol 15-S-5, Tergitol 15-S-7 and Tergitol 15-S-9.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, alcohol ethoxylates (e.g. the secondary alcohol ethoxylates described above) can be used to improve the discharge capacity and/or cycling efficiency of a lithium-sulphur cell. Electrolytes containing such surfactants have been found to be capable of wetting separators formed, for example, of polypropylene and/or polyethylene more effectively. This in turn may improve the electrochemical performance of the cell. In some embodiments, the effect is particularly pronounced when the electrolyte comprises a sulfone solvent, for example, sulfolane. Sulfolane is typically viscous and may not wet the cell's separators effectively. However, when an alcohol ethoxylate is dispersed in a sulfone (e.g. sulfolane) solvent, the wetting capability of the solvent may be significantly improved.
Preferably, the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.5-3 weight %, more preferably 1.25-2.25 weight %, for example 1.75 weight %. In one embodiment, the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.75 weight %.
Preferably, the surfactant is present in an amount of 3-35 weight % in relation to the weight of the separator, more preferably 5-20%, for example 10-15%.
In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises at least one lithium salt and at least one organic solvent; and a surfactant, wherein the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.5-3 weight %.
The separator may comprise any suitable porous substrate that allows ions to move between the electrodes of the cell. The separator should be positioned between the electrodes to prevent direct contact between the electrodes. The porosity of the substrate should be at least 30%, preferably at least 50%, for example, above 60%. Preferably, the porosity of the separator is 40-60%, more preferably 45-55%, for example 50%. Suitable separators include a mesh formed of a polymeric material. Suitable polymers include polypropylene, nylon and polyethylene. Non-woven polypropylene is particularly preferred. It is possible for a multi-layered separator to be employed.
Preferably, the separator is selected from non-woven polypropylene and polyethylene.
Preferably, the permeability of the separator is less than 300 Gurley, more preferably less than 250 Gurley, for example 200 Gurley.
The separator is preferably devoid of a surfactant-containing coating. For example, the separator may be devoid of a coating containing at least one surfactant selected from secondary alcohol ethoxylates, tetraethylene glycol dodecyl ethers, silicone glycols, imidazolines, polyoxyethylenesorbitan monopalmitates and polyoxyethylene nonyl-phenyl ethers and mixtures thereof.
As discussed above, according to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of producing a lithium-sulphur cell as defined herein, said method comprising: incorporating an electrolyte comprising at least one lithium salt, at least one organic solvent, and a surfactant into a cell assembly comprising an anode comprising lithium metal or lithium metal alloy, a cathode comprising a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material, and a porous separator.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, electrolyte is incorporated into the cell assembly by coating the electrolyte on the cathode, placing the separator over the coated cathode and placing the anode over the separator. The coating may be carried out in any suitable way, for example by spraying, extruding, pouring and/or spreading the electrolyte over the active sulphur material.
Alternatively, a cell assembly comprising an anode comprising lithium metal or lithium metal alloy, a cathode comprising a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material, and a porous separator may be produced, and an electrolyte comprising at least one lithium salt, at least one organic solvent, and a surfactant subsequently introduced into the cell assembly.
After the electrolyte is incorporated into the cell assembly, the cell may be sealed e.g. in an enclosure. The enclosure may be water-tight and/or air-tight. Suitable enclosures include pouches.
Preferably, the anode is a metal foil electrode, such as a lithium foil electrode.
The cathode of the electrochemical cell includes a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material. This mixture forms an electroactive layer, which may be placed in contact with a current collector.
The electroactive sulphur material may comprise elemental sulphur, sulphur-based organic compounds, sulphur-based inorganic compounds and sulphur-containing polymers. Preferably, elemental sulphur is used.
The solid electroconductive material may be any suitable conductive material. Preferably, this solid electroconductive material may be formed of carbon. Examples include carbon black, carbon fibre, graphene and carbon nanotubes. Other suitable materials include metal (e.g. flakes, filings and powders) and conductive polymers. Preferably, carbon black is employed.
The electrolyte comprises at least one lithium salt, at least one organic solvent and a surfactant. Suitable lithium salts include at least one of lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium trifluoromethanesulfonimide (LiN(CF3SO2)2)), lithium borofluoride, lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate (CF3SO3Li), and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiB(C2O4)2). Preferably the lithium salt is lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate.
Suitable organic solvents for use in the electrolyte are tetrahydrofurane, 2-methyltetrahydrofurane, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate, ethylmethylcarbonate, methylpropylcarbonate, methylpropylpropionate, ethyl propylpropionate, methyl acetate, dimethoxyethane, 1,3-dioxolane, diglyme (2-methoxyethyl ether), tetraglyme, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, γ-butyrolactone, dioxolane, hexamethyl phosphoamide, pyridine, dimethyl sulfoxide, tributyl phosphate, trimethyl phosphate, N,N,N,N-tetraethyl sulfamide, and sulfone and their mixtures. Preferably, the organic solvent is a sulfone or a mixture of sulfones. Examples of sulfones are dimethyl sulfone and sulfolane. Sulfolane may be employed as the sole solvent or in combination, for example, with other sulfones.
The organic solvent used in the electrolyte should be capable of dissolving the polysulphide species, for example, of the formula Sn2−, where n=2 to 12, that are formed when the electroactive sulphur material is reduced during discharge of the cell.
In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate and sulfolane.
The concentration of lithium salt in the electrolyte is preferably 0.1 to 5M, more preferably 0.5 to 3M, for example, 1M. The lithium salt is preferably present at a concentration that is at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, for example, 95 to 99% of saturation.
Preferably, the surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant. Suitable surfactants include long chain alcohols (such as fatty alcohols, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol and olely alcohol); alcohol ethoxylates (eg Tergitol 15-S-5, -7 and -9); polyoxyethylene glycol alkyl ethers (Brij), for example octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether and pentaethylene glycol monododecyl ether; polyoxypropylene glycol alkyl ethers; glucoside alkyl ethers, for example decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside and octyl glucoside; polyoxyethylene glycol octylphenol ethers, for example Triton X-100; polyoxyethylene glycol alkylphenol ethers, for example nonxynol-9; glycerol alkyl esters, for example glyceryl laurate; polyoxyethylene glycol sorbitan alkyl esters, sorbitan alkyl esters, cocamide MEA, cocamide DEA, dodecyldimethylamine oxide, block copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol (poloxamers) and polyethoxy tallow amine (POEA). Preferably, the surfactant does not include fluorine. Preferably, the surfactant is not a fluorine-based surfactant represented by a formula:
Wherein R is a hydrogen, an acetyl group, a methyl group, or a benzoyl group; and m and n are integers from 2 to 20.
Preferably, the surfactant is selected from secondary alcohol ethoxylates, tetraethylene glycol dodecyl ethers, silicone glycols, imidazolines, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitates and polyoxyethylene nonyl-phenyl ethers and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the surfactant is an alcohol ethoxylate, a polyethylene glycol alkyl ether (e.g. polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether) or a polyoxytheylene alkyl ether (e.g. polyoxyethylene oleyl ether or polyoxyethylene lauryl ether).
In a preferred embodiment, the surfactant is an alcohol ethoxylate. An example is 2-dodecoxyethanol (Brij-30). Other examples include secondary alcohol ethoxylates. For example, the secondary alcohol ethoxylate may have the general formula:
C12-14H25-29[CH2CH2O]xH,
where x is an integer of 5 to 9, for example, 5, 7 or 9.
In one embodiment, the surfactant has the formula:
where x is an integer of 5 to 9, for example, 5, 7 or 9, preferably 5. Suitable examples of such surfactants include those sold under the trademark Tergitol 15-S, for example, Tergitol 15-S-5 (x=5), Tergitol 15-S-7 (x=7) and Tergitol 15-S-9 (x=9).
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, alcohol ethoxylates (e.g. the secondary alcohol ethoxylates described above) can be used to improve the discharge capacity and/or cycling efficiency of a lithium-sulphur cell. Electrolytes containing such surfactants have been found to be capable of wetting separators formed, for example, of polypropylene and/or polyethylene more effectively. This in turn may improve the electrochemical performance of the cell. In some embodiments, the effect is particularly pronounced when the electrolyte comprises a sulfone solvent, for example, sulfolane. Sulfolane is typically viscous and may not wet the cell's separators effectively. However, when an alcohol ethoxylate is dispersed in a sulfone (e.g. sulfolane) solvent, the wetting capability of the solvent may be significantly improved.
Preferably, the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.75-3 weight %, more preferably 1.25-2.25 weight %, for example 1.75 weight %.
Preferably, the surfactant is present in an amount of 3-35 weight % in relation to the weight of the separator, more preferably 5-20%, for example 10-15%.
In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises at least one lithium salt and at least one organic solvent; and a surfactant, wherein the concentration of surfactant in the electrolyte is 0.5-3 weight %.
The separator may comprise any suitable porous substrate that allows ions to move between the electrodes of the cell. The separator should be positioned between the electrodes to prevent direct contact between the electrodes. The porosity of the substrate should be at least 30%, preferably at least 50%, for example, above 60%. Preferably, the porosity of the separator is 40-60%, more preferably 45-55%, for example 50%. Suitable separators include a mesh formed of a polymeric material. Suitable polymers include polypropylene, nylon and polyethylene. Non-woven polypropylene is particularly preferred. It is possible for a multi-layered separator to be employed.
Preferably, the separator is selected from non-woven polypropylene and polyethylene.
Preferably, the permeability of the separator is less than 300 Gurley, more preferably less than 250 Gurley, for example 200 Gurley.
The separator is preferably devoid of a surfactant-containing coating. For example, the separator may be devoid of a coating containing at least one surfactant selected from secondary alcohol ethoxylates, tetraethylene glycol dodecyl ethers, silicone glycols, imidazolines, polyoxyethylenesorbitan monopalmitates and polyoxyethylene nonyl-phenyl ethers and mixtures thereof.
In this Example, the charge and discharge capacity of two lithium-sulphur cells were measured over a number of cycles. The cells were assembled using a lithium anode and a positive electrode comprising 70% sulphur, 10% carbon black and 20% polyethylene oxide (PEO). Each cell also contained, respectively:
As can be seen from
In this Example, the discharge capacities of various lithium-sulphur cells according to the present invention were measured over a number of cycles. The cells included, respectively:
The discharge capacity of cell comprising a Celgard 3501 separator (coated with surfactant) and an electrolyte of 1M lithium triflate in sulfolane (not comprising surfactant) was also measured over a number of cycles. The concentration of the surfactant in each of the electrolyte in each of the cells was approximately 2 weight %.
The results are shown in
In this Example, a number of lithium sulphur cells with varying surfactant (Tergitol 15-S-5) concentrations in an electrolyte of 1M lithium triflate in sulfolane were subjected to pre-cycling (cycling under standard conditions until their capacity developed to its full value) approximately 24 hours from assembly. Following pre-cycling, the first discharge capacity was measured. The first discharge capacity of a reference cell, comprising a Celgard 3501 separator (with surfactant coating) and an electrolyte of 1M lithium triflate in sulfolane was also measured following pre-cycling.
As can be seen from Table 1, below surfactant concentrations of 0.5 weight %, the resistance following pre-cycling is too high and the discharge capacity is very low.
In this Example, the discharge capacities of various lithium-sulphur cells according to the present invention were measured over a number of cycles. The cells included, respectively:
The concentration of the surfactant in each of the electrolyte in each of the cells was approximately 2 weight %.
The discharge capacity is highest with cell (i) above.
In this Example, the discharge capacities of various lithium-sulphur cells were measured over a number of cycles. The cells included, respectively:
The results are shown in
In this Example, the discharge capacities of various lithium-sulphur cells were measured over a number of cycles. The cells included, respectively:
Cell (i) above did not cycle. Cells (ii) and (iii) cycled. However, as can be seen from
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13197806 | Dec 2013 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2014/053715 | 12/16/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015/092380 | 6/25/2015 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3030720 | Osswald et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
| 3185590 | Mayer et al. | May 1965 | A |
| 3578500 | Maricle et al. | May 1971 | A |
| 3639174 | Kegelman | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3721113 | Hovsepian | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3778310 | Garth | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3877983 | Hovsepian | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3907591 | Lauck | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3907597 | Mellors | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3939010 | Coleman | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3951688 | Pankow et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 4060674 | Klemann et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4104451 | Klemann et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4118550 | Koch | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4154906 | Bubnick et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4163829 | Kronenberg | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4218523 | Kalnoki-Kis | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4252876 | Koch | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4303748 | Armand et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4318430 | Perman | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4410609 | Peled et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4499161 | Foos | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4503234 | Huwiler et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4550064 | Yen et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4690877 | Gabano et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4725927 | Morimoto et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4740436 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 5079109 | Takami et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5219684 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5368958 | Hirai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5460905 | Skotheim | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462566 | Skotheim | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5523179 | Chu | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5529860 | Skotheim et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5532077 | Chu | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5582623 | Chu | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587253 | Gozdz et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5648187 | Skotheim | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5744262 | Cheng et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5789108 | Chu | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797428 | Miller | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814420 | Chu | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5919587 | Mukherjee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5961672 | Skotheim et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5962171 | Boguslavsky et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6030720 | Chu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6051342 | Hamano | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6090504 | Sung et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6117590 | Skotheim et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6162562 | Tsuji et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174621 | Skotheim et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6201100 | Gorkovenko et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210831 | Gorkovenko et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6245465 | Angell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6302928 | Xu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319633 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6344293 | Geronov | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6358643 | Katz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6376123 | Chu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6537704 | Akashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6544691 | Guidotti | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6613480 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6632573 | Nimon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6706449 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6733924 | Skotheim et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6797428 | Skotheim et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 7108942 | Gan et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7250233 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7335440 | Aamodt et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7354680 | Mikhaylik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7875393 | Ryu | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 20010008736 | Fanta et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020022181 | Tsujioka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034688 | Chu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020039677 | Iwamoto et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045101 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045102 | Jung et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020102466 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168574 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020192557 | Choi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030073005 | Kim et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175596 | Park et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180611 | Mikhaylik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190530 | Yang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002002 | Mitzuta et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040028999 | LaLiberte | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048164 | Jung et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053129 | Jung et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072066 | Cho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040091776 | Hwang | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096744 | Sadamitsu | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096750 | Kim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101753 | Hwang | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137330 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157132 | Kim et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219428 | Nagayama | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040222768 | Moore et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258996 | Kim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050136327 | Miyake et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156575 | Mikhaylik | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221192 | Hennige et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238956 | Lee | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244693 | Strutt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060024579 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051643 | Sarkar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105233 | Morita | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121355 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177741 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204856 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234126 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292451 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070072076 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281210 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080038645 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060189 | Daidoji et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080100264 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090053565 | Iacovelli | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090111029 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090246626 | Tasaki et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090317717 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100129724 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100231168 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273048 | Machida | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110059361 | Wilkening et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151317 | Giroud | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120282530 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120293114 | Murochi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120315553 | Fuminori et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20140079989 | Janakiraman | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20150147656 | Kogetsu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1389948 | Jan 2003 | CN |
| 0 710 995 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0 764 489 | Mar 1997 | EP |
| 0 924 783 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 1 176 659 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1 178 555 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1 400 996 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1 420 475 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1 865 520 | Dec 2007 | EP |
| 1 962 364 | Aug 2008 | EP |
| 2 023 461 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 2 026 402 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 2 259 376 | Dec 2010 | EP |
| 2084391 | Apr 1982 | GB |
| 2200068 | Jul 1988 | GB |
| 59-194361 | Nov 1984 | JP |
| 63-081767 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 64-107467 | Apr 1989 | JP |
| 01-124969 | May 1989 | JP |
| 08-069812 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| 08-138650 | May 1996 | JP |
| 08-138742 | May 1996 | JP |
| 08-298229 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 08-298230 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 09-027328 | Jan 1997 | JP |
| 09-147913 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 10-284076 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 11-273729 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 2001-167751 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2002-075446 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2005-071641 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005-108724 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2005-005215 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-243342 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2006-134785 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2009-087728 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2011-108469 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2011-192574 | Sep 2011 | JP |
| 10-2002-0089134 | Nov 2002 | KR |
| 10-2003-0368753 | Apr 2003 | KR |
| 10-2003-0056497 | Jul 2003 | KR |
| 10-2011-0024707 | Mar 2011 | KR |
| 2001-047088 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 2001-097304 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 2002-095849 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| 2006-050117 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2007-111988 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007-132994 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| TERGITOL 15-S Surfactants, The Dow Chemical Company, Jul. 2006 (Year: 2006). |
| International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/051633, dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
| Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/051633, dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/052728, dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/05088, dated Jul. 7, 2014. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/05088, dated Jul. 7, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050888, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050890, dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050890, dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050890, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050891, dated Jul. 24, 2014. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050891, dated Jul. 24, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050891, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/052474, dated Nov. 5, 2014. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/052474, dated Nov. 5, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/052474, dated Feb. 16, 2016. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053715, dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053715, dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053715, dated Jun. 21, 2016. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053719, dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053719, dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/051633, dated Jun. 17, 2014. |
| International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/052728, dated Jan. 2, 2013. |
| Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/052728, dated Jan. 2, 2013. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053719, dated Jun. 21, 2016. |
| Aurbach et al., “A Short Review of Failure Mechanism of Lithium Metal and Lithiated Graphite Anodes in Liquid Electrolyte Solutions”, Solid State Lonics, 2002, vol. 148, p. 405-416. |
| Bates et al., “Solvent Effects on Acid-Base Behavior: Five Uncharged Acids in Water-Sulfolane Solvents”, 1976, Journal of Solution Chemistry, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 213-222. |
| Chagnes et al., “Butyrolactone-Ethylene Carbonate Based Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries”, Jul. 2003, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 33, p. 589-595. |
| Chang et al., “Binary Electrolyte Based on Tetra (ethylene glycol) Dimethyl Ether and 1,3-dioxolane for Lithium-Sulphur Battery”, J. Power Sources, 2002, vol. 112, p. 452-460. |
| Cowie et al. “Ion Conduction in Macroporous Polyethylene Film Doped With Electrolytes” Solid State Ionics 109 (1998) 139-144. |
| Fujinaga et al. “Electrochemical Reduction of Elemental Sulphur in Acetonitrile”, Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, vol. 53, p. 2851-2855. |
| Jeon et al. Solvent-Free Polymer Electrolytes Based on Thermally Annealed Porous P(VdF-HFP)/P(EO-EC) Membranes. |
| Kolosnitsyn “Physicochemical and Electrochemical Properties of Sulfolane Solutions of Lithium Salts”, Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, May 2008, vol. 44(5), p. 575-578. |
| Komaba et al., “Inorganic Electrolyte Additives to Supress the Degradation of Graphite Anodes by Dissolved Mn(II) for Lithium Ion Batteries”, Mar. 2003, Journal of Power Sources, 1190121, p. 378-382. |
| Levillain et al., “On the Understanding of the Reduction of Sulphur (S8) in Dimethylformamide (DMF)”, J. of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1997, vol. 420, p. 167-177. |
| Nazri et al., “Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology”, 2003, p. 509-573, Hardcover, ISBN: 978-1-4020-7628-2. |
| Paris et al. “Electrochemical Reduction of Sulphur in Dimethylacetamide”, Electrochimica Acta, 1981, vol. 26, No. 12, p. 1823-1829. |
| Peled et al., “Rechargeable Lithium-Sulphur Battery (extended abstract)”, J. of Power Sources, 1989, vol. 26, p. 269-271. |
| Peled et al., “Lithium-Sulphur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolytes”, J. Electrochem Soc., 1989, vol. 136, No. 6, p. 1621-1625. |
| Rauh et al., “Formation of Lithium Polysulphides in Aprotic Media”, J. Inorg. Nucl Chem, 1977, vol. 39, p. 1761-1766. |
| Rauh et al., “A Lithium/Dissolved Sulphur Battery with an Organic Electrolyte”, J. Electrochem Soc., 1979, vol. 126, No. 4, p. 523-527. |
| Suo et al. “A New Class of Solvent-in-Salt Electrolyte for High-Energy Rechargeable Metallic Lithium Batteries” Nature Communications, 2013, vol. 4, p. 1481. |
| Tobishima et al, “Study on the Reduction Species of Sulphur by Alkali Metals in Nonaqueous Solvents”, Electrochimica Acta, 1997, vol. 42, No. 6, p. 1019-1029. |
| Ultralife Batteries Inc. “Transportation Regulations for Lithium, Lithium Ion and Polymer Cells and Batteries”, Rev. H, Dec. 18, 2003. |
| Yamin et al., “Electrochemistry of a Nonaqueous Lithium/Sulphur Cell”, J of Power Sources, 1983, vol. 9, p. 281-287. |
| Yamin et al., “The Electrochemical Behavior of Polysulphides in Tetrahydrofuran”, J. of Power Sources, 1985, vol. 14, p. 129-134. |
| Yamin et al., “Lithium Sulphur Battery Oxidation/Reduction Mechanisms of Polysulphides in THF Solution”, J. Electrochem Soc. 1988, vol. 135, No. 5, p. 1045-1048. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,825, dated Jun. 11, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/526,876, dated Oct. 30, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,203, dated Apr. 3, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,203, dated Oct. 9, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Aug. 21, 2007. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Feb. 20, 2007. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Mar. 11, 2008. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Aug. 27, 2008. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Feb. 26, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Jul. 31, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Jan. 6, 2009. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Aug. 19, 2008. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Feb. 5, 2008. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/889,334, dated Aug. 14, 2009. |
| UK Search Report, Application No. GB 0416708.6, Section 17, dated Aug. 10, 2004. |
| UK Search Report, Application No. GB 0501001.2, dated Apr. 14, 2005. |
| Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2007-550839 dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
| Korean Office Action for Application No. 10-2013-7031637, dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2005/002850, dated Aug. 25, 2005. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2005/002850, dated Aug. 25, 2005. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2005/002850, dated Jan. 30, 2007. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2006/000103, dated Jun. 20, 2007. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2006/000103, dated Jun. 20, 2007. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2006/000103, dated Jul. 24, 2007. |
| International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2006/050300, dated Dec. 6, 2006. |
| Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2006/050300, dated Dec. 6, 2006. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2006/050300, dated Mar. 26, 2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160308246 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |