The present invention is generally directed to fuel cell components, and to solid oxide fuel cell materials in particular.
Fuel cells are electrochemical devices which can convert energy stored in fuels to electrical energy with high efficiencies. Electrolyzer cells are electrochemical devices which can use electrical energy to reduce a given material, such as water, to generate a fuel, such as hydrogen. The fuel and electrolyzer cells may comprise reversible cells which operate in both fuel cell and electrolysis mode.
In a high temperature fuel cell system, such as a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system, an oxidizing flow is passed through the cathode side of the fuel cell, while a fuel flow is passed through the anode side of the fuel cell. The oxidizing flow is typically air, while the fuel flow can be a hydrocarbon fuel, such as methane, natural gas, propane, ethanol, or methanol. The fuel cell, operating at a typical temperature between 750° C. and 950° C., enables combination of the oxygen and free hydrogen, leaving surplus electrons behind. The excess electrons are routed back to the cathode side of the fuel cell through an electrical circuit completed between anode and cathode, resulting in an electrical current flow through the circuit.
Fuel cell stacks may be either internally or externally manifolded for fuel and air. In internally manifolded stacks, the fuel and air is distributed to each cell using risers contained within the stack. In other words, the gas flows through openings or holes in the supporting layer of each fuel cell, such as the electrolyte layer, and gas separator of each cell. In externally manifolded stacks, the stack is open on the fuel and air inlet and outlet sides, and the fuel and air are introduced and collected independently of the stack hardware. For example, the inlet and outlet fuel and air flow in separate channels between the stack and the manifold housing in which the stack is located.
Typically, SOFC are fabricated either as electrolyte supported, anode supported, or cathode supported, depending on which of the three functional components of the cell provides structural support. In planar electrolyte supported SOFC designs, the anode and cathode electrodes are painted as an ink onto the opposite surfaces of a planar ceramic electrolyte. However, weakness in structural integrity, particularly at or around the fuel inlet and outlet riser openings, might arise in these designs under certain loading conditions.
Ceramics are known to exhibit fracture before any plastic deformation can occur in response to an applied tensile load, such as during thermal cycling. Fracture in ceramics usually originates at preexisting defects, such as microcracks, internal pores, and grain corners. Fracture strength depends on the probability of the existence of a defect that is capable of initiating a crack. W
A solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) comprises a cathode electrode, an anode electrode, and a solid oxide electrolyte located between the anode electrode and the cathode electrode. The cathode electrode comprises a porous ceramic layer infiltrated with a cathode catalyst material, the anode electrode comprises a porous ceramic layer infiltrated with an anode catalyst material and the electrolyte comprises a ceramic layer having a lower porosity than the anode and the cathode electrodes.
Another aspect of the invention provides a SOFC which includes an anode electrode, a cathode electrode, and a solid oxide electrolyte located between the anode electrode and the cathode electrode. The anode electrode or the cathode electrode comprises a porous first ceramic layer infiltrated with an anode material or a cathode material, and the electrolyte comprises a second ceramic layer having a lower porosity than the first ceramic layer.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) includes a ceramic electrolyte having at least one fuel inlet or outlet riser opening, an anode contacting the electrolyte on a first side of the electrolyte, a cathode contacting the electrolyte on a second side opposite the first side, and a ceramic reinforcing region that is located at least partially around a circumference of the riser opening.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method of making a hole-reinforced electrolyte, comprising providing a ceramic reinforcing region at least partially around a circumference of a riser opening in a ceramic electrolyte, and sintering the ceramic reinforcing region.
In one embodiment of the invention, only the electrode provides structural support for the cell. The anode and cathode electrodes comprise inks painted or screen printed onto the ceramic electrolyte, such as a stabilized zirconia and/or doped ceria, such as yttria stabilized zirconia (“YSZ”), scandia stabilized zirconia (“SCZ”), gadolinia doped ceria (“GDC”) and/or samaria doped ceria (“SDC”) electrolyte. In another embodiment of the invention, both electrodes and the electrolyte provide structural support for the fuel cell. This provides a higher strength for each cell and allows a thinner and/or larger footprint electrolyte while lowering the cost for electrolyte production. The dense electrolyte layer is located between two catalyst infiltrated electrode layers which have a higher porosity than the electrolyte layer. The electrolyte may be considered “non-porous” because the porosity of the electrolyte is lower than that of the electrodes and should be sufficiently low to prevent the electrode catalyst from infiltrating through the thickness of the electrolyte. However, it should be noted that as a ceramic material, the electrolyte contains a certain amount of porosity. While closed pores are allowed within the electrolyte because they do not have any connection with the surface, the amount of open porosity should be minimized. Preferably, the porosity limit is such that the permeability is low enough to avoid significant reaction of fuel and oxidizer without the flow of ions and that the permeability is low enough to maintain certain spatial separation between electrodes.
In one embodiment, the two outer electrode layers and the middle electrolyte layer are made of the same ceramic material, such as a stabilized zirconia. In another embodiment, the outer porous electrode layers are made of a different ceramic material from that of the electrolyte. The electrode layers may be made of the same or different ceramic material from each other. In either case, they are infiltrated with a different respective anode and cathode catalyst material. In yet another embodiment, ceramic interlayers and/or a non-continuous outer layer is added to the fuel cell to provide reinforcement, thereby providing additional mechanical strength to the fuel cell.
While the electrode catalysts are described above as being preferably produced by infiltration into a porous ceramic layer, the fuel cells may be made by any suitable methods. Furthermore, while stabilized zirconias, such as yttria, scandia and/or ceria stabilized zirconia, and doped cerias, such as samaria doped ceria, are preferred as the ceramic materials for the electrodes and/or electrolyte layers, other suitable ceramic materials may be used instead.
Preferably, the scandia stabilized zirconia for the electrolyte 5 has the following formula: [(ZrO2)1-y(CeO2)y]1-x(Sc2O3)x, where 0.06≦x≦0.11 and 0≦y≦0.01. While a stoichiometric stabilized zirconia is described by the formula, a non-stoichiometric stabilized zirconia having more or less than two oxygen atoms for each metal atom may be used. For example, the electrolyte may comprise SCSZ having 1 molar percent ceria and 10 molar percent scandia (i.e., [(ZrO2)1-y(CeO2)y]1-x(Sc2O3)x where x=0.1 and y=0.01). The ceria in SCSZ may be substituted with other ceramic oxides. Thus, alternative scandia stabilized zirconias can be used, such as scandia yttria stabilized zirconia (“SYSZ”), which can also be referred to as scandium and yttrium doped zirconia, and scandia alumina stabilized zirconia (“SAlSZ”), which can also be referred to as scandium and aluminum doped zirconia. The yttria or alumina may comprise 1 molar percent or less in the scandia stabilized zirconia.
The number of layers in the SOFC need not be restricted to three.
It is desirable that all layers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 be as thin as possible. The thickness of the layers can be optimized to provide desired electrical and mechanical properties. For example, the middle electrolyte layer 5 should be at least 5 microns thick, such as about 25 to about 75 microns thick, while the thickness of the outer porous electrode layers 3, 7 can be between about 20 to about 100 microns. If the sintering properties of the three layers 3, 5, 7 are adjusted appropriately, then the thicknesses of the three layer cell can be asymmetric. The anode porous layer 3 may be thinner than the cathode layer 7 to allow high fuel utilization at the anode while the cathode can be kept thicker because air utilization is generally much less critical. For example, the anode layer 3 may be about 20 to about 50 microns thick while the cathode layer 7 may be about 50 to about 100 microns thick. For a five layer cell 21 shown in
In another embodiment, a non-continuous outer or support layer 30 is added to the SOFC 31. One such embodiment is illustrated in
If the outer layer or layers 30 are located outside the electrochemically active area (referred to as a peripheral area), as shown in
If desired, a seal may be formed around the periphery of the porous layer(s) 3, 7 and/or around the riser openings (if present). As shown in
Fuel cell stacks are frequently built from a multiplicity of SOFC's in the form of planar elements, tubes, or other geometries. Fuel and air has to be provided to the electrochemically active surface, which can be large. As shown in
Furthermore, while
The term “fuel cell stack,” as used herein, means a plurality of stacked fuel cells which share a common fuel inlet and exhaust passages or risers. The “fuel cell stack,” as used herein, includes a distinct electrical entity which contains two end plates which are connected to power conditioning equipment and the power (i.e., electricity) output of the stack. Thus, in some configurations, the electrical power output from such a distinct electrical entity may be separately controlled from other stacks. The term “fuel cell stack” as used herein, also includes a part of the distinct electrical entity. For example, the stacks may share the same end plates. In this case, the stacks jointly comprise a distinct electrical entity. In this case, the electrical power output from both stacks cannot be separately controlled.
Any suitable ceramic fabrication method may be used for forming the SOFCs of the embodiments of the invention. For the ink-printed electrodes, the electrode inks are applied to opposite sides of the electrolyte followed by sintering. The multi-layer structure of described SOFC may be fabricated laminate tape casting of the green ceramic (i.e., where the laminate tape contains the electrode matrix and electrolyte green ceramic). Alternatively, the SOFC can be created by multi layer tape casting. Calendring or roll compaction of multiple layers of tape allows further manipulation of the layer thickness. Other compacting methods, such as uniaxial or isostatic pressing of the tape cast layers, can also be used. The pressing may be performed with or without compatible organic adhesives. The electrode layers 3, 7 may contain pore former material(s) while the electrolyte 5 does not contain pore former material. Any suitable pore former material may be used, such as for example carbon (e.g., graphite, activated carbon, petroleum coke, carbon black or the like), starch (e.g., corn, barley, bean, potato, rice, tapioca, pea, sago palm, wheat, canna, or the like), and/or polymer (e.g., polybutylene, polymethylpentene, polyethylene (such as beads), polypropylene (such as beads), polystyrene, polyamides (nylons), epoxies, ABS, acrylics, polyesters (PET), or the like), as described in U.S. Published Application 2007/0006561, which is incorporated herein by reference. The pore former may comprise about 1 to about 25 weight percent of the green ceramic mixture which also includes the ceramic precursors (i.e., zirconia, scandia, yttria, ceria, etc.), a binder and a solvent. During a subsequent annealing step, such as a burn out, bake out or a sintering step, the pore former material(s) burn out and leave a porous electrode structure, while the middle electrolyte layer in the absence of pore formers becomes dense. Alternatively, the porous outer layers may be deposited after sintering or firing of the middle layer. The outer layers may be sintered or fired at a lower temperature than the middle layer. The outer layers or the interlayers can also be added by methods such as tape casting, screen printing, spin coating, etc. after sintering of the middle electrolyte layer; this addition allows sintering to take place at a lower temperature, thereby expanding the choice of materials.
The electrode and electrolyte layers are preferably sintered together to form a strong structural element. They can be sintered at any suitable temperature, such as a temperature between 1150 and 1400° C. in air. The electrodes are created by infiltrating the appropriate catalyst materials into the two outer porous electrode matrix layers 3, 7 either before and/or after the sintering step. The catalyst materials may be provided in a liquid or slurry form to the electrode matrix layers. Preferably, the infiltration step occurs after the sintering step. Infiltrated electrodes can be subjected to a bake out annealing step at a temperature of 600° C. or less, which is far below cell operating temperature and even further away from ceramic sintering temperatures, thereby avoiding the commonly observed weakening of SOFC when electrodes are applied externally and sintered. Also the reactivity of all materials involved is low at bake out temperature which avoids another common difficulty with conventionally fired electrodes which may form undesirable material phases.
To form an electrode, the porous layer 73 is infiltrated with either an anode material or a cathode material. For example, the porous layer 73 is infiltrated with nickel such that the porous layer comprises an anode electrode. Alternatively, the porous layer is infiltrated with an electrically conductive perovskite material, for example lanthanum strontium manganite (LSM), such that the porous layer 73 comprises a cathode electrode. Infiltration can be performed by depositing a solution of a precursor, such as a catalytic precursor, of the anode or cathode material into the pores of the porous layer 73.
The SOFC 71 also includes a second electrode 79 in contact with the thin film 75 of the structure 77. The second electrode 79 is preferably thinner than the film 75 or porous layer 73. For example, the second electrode 79 may be less than 40 μm thick, such as about 10-30 μm, preferably about 20 μm. The second electrode 79 can be formed either before or after infiltration is performed on the porous layer 73. If the porous layer 73 comprises an anode, then the second electrode 79 comprises a cathode. Alternatively, if the porous layer 73 comprises a cathode, then the second electrode 79 comprises an anode. The second electrode 79 can be deposited using convention methods, such as screen printing. After being deposited on the thin film 79, the second electrode 79 can be sintered either before or after the porous layer 73 is infiltrated with a solution. Sintering can be performed at a temperature of about 1150° C. to about 1400° C. Preferably, only a single sintering step is performed, such that the anode, cathode, and electrolyte are co-sintered at the same time.
An advantage of the SOFC 71 is that it minimizes the orange discoloration associated with degradation of SSZ electrolytes. Preferably, the electrolyte thin film 75 is sufficiently thin to minimize hydrogen diffusion within the electrolyte. Without wishing to be bound to any particular theory, it is believed that orange discoloration of SSZ electrolytes arises at least in part due to hydrogen diffusion and, thus, a reduction in the thickness of the electrolyte tends to decrease degradation and increase operating life. Aside from decreased degradation, the electrolyte thin film 75 of the SOFC 71 exhibits the additional advantage of reducing the ionic resistance of the electrolyte and thereby increasing cell performance.
As shown in
The reinforcing regions 173, 175 can be made in a variety of ways. For example, an additional layer of electrolyte material can be laminated and sintered on an electrolyte that has already been fired. The electrolyte is then sintered and solidified. Alternatively, a screen printing technique can be used to provide a ceramic paste (with or without reinforcing fibers and/or particles) onto the electrolyte. If reinforcing fibers or particles are incorporated into the paste, then the materials of the reinforcing phase can be similar or different than that of the base electrolyte substrate. Preferably, the material of the reinforcing phase has a similar coefficient of thermal expansion as that of the base electrolyte substrate, such that cracking due to thermal cycling is minimized. The electrolyte on which the paste is deposited can either be a fired electrolyte or a green tape that has not yet been fired. The green tape can contain the electrolyte, anode, and cathode. In the case of a green tape, the ceramic paste can be co-sintered together with the green tape in order to reduce the number of firing steps used during fuel cell fabrication.
The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. The description was chosen in order to explain the principles of the invention and its practical application. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto, and their equivalents.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/292,151, filed Nov. 12, 2008, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/996,352 filed Nov. 13, 2007, 61/129,759 filed Jul. 17, 2008 and 61/129,882 filed Jul. 25, 2008, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4272353 | Lawrance et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4426269 | Brown et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4575407 | Diller | Mar 1986 | A |
4686158 | Nishi et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4792502 | Trocciola et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4804592 | Vanderborgh et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4847173 | Mitsunnaga et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4898792 | Singh et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4917971 | Farooque | Apr 1990 | A |
4925745 | Remick et al. | May 1990 | A |
4983471 | Reichner et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5034287 | Kunz | Jul 1991 | A |
5047299 | Shockling | Sep 1991 | A |
5143800 | George et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5169730 | Reichner et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170124 | Blair et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192334 | Rohr et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5273837 | Aitken et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5302470 | Okada et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5441821 | Merritt et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445903 | Cable et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5498487 | Ruka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501914 | Satake et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505824 | McElroy | Apr 1996 | A |
5527631 | Singh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573867 | Zafred et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589285 | Cable et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601937 | Isenberg | Feb 1997 | A |
5686196 | Singh et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688609 | Rostrup-Nielsen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5733675 | Dederer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741605 | Gillett et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5922488 | Marucchi-Soos et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5955039 | Dowdy | Sep 1999 | A |
6013385 | DuBose | Jan 2000 | A |
6051125 | Pham et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6106964 | Voss et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6228521 | Kim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238816 | Cable et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280865 | Eisman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329090 | McElroy et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6403245 | Hunt | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428920 | Badding et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436562 | DuBose | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451466 | Grasso et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6489050 | Ruhl et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6558831 | Doshi et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6623880 | Geisbrecht et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6677070 | Kearl | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682842 | Visco et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6821663 | McElroy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835488 | Sasahara et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6854688 | McElroy et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6924053 | McElroy et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7045237 | Sridhar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045239 | Donelson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7150927 | Hickey et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7255956 | McElroy | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7968245 | Gottmann | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010049035 | Haltiner, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020028362 | Prediger et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020028367 | Sammes et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058175 | Ruhl | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076593 | Helfinstine et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020098406 | Huang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106544 | Noetzel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127455 | Pham et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132156 | Ruhl et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030059668 | Visco et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030162067 | McElroy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165732 | McElroy | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196893 | McElroy | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040081859 | McElroy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040115503 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040191595 | McElroy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191597 | McElroy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191598 | Gottmann et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202914 | Sridhar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224193 | Mitlitsky et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050048334 | Sridhar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050227133 | Gorte et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060008682 | McLean et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040168 | Sridhar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057295 | Visco et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060166070 | Hickey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197264 | Cutler et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231987 | Mukundan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234100 | Day et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070006561 | Brady et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070080061 | Gorte et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070287048 | Couse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080076006 | Gottmann et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096080 | El Batawi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080193803 | Sholklapper et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193825 | Nguyyen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080254336 | El Batawi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1667860 | Sep 2005 | CN |
WO 2004093214 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005057685 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006116153 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,006, “Electrolyte Supported Cell Designed for Longer Life and Higher Power,” filed Oct. 7, 2011, Specification & Drawings, 29 pgs. |
W. D. Callister, Jr., Materials Science and Engineering, 5th Edition, 1999, pp. 407-411. |
Cell and Stack Construction: Low-Temperature Cells, L.G. Austin, NASA SP-120, 1967. |
EG & G Services, Parsons, Inc., SAIC, Fuel Cell Handbook, 5th Edition, UDDOE. Oct. 2000. pp. 9-1-9-4, and 9-12-9-14. |
J.M. Sedlak, J. F. Austin and A. B. LaConti, “Hydrogen Recovery and Purification Using the Solid Polymer Electrolyte Electrolysis Cell,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 6, pp. 45-51. (1981). |
Low Cost Reversible Fuel Cell System, Proceedings of the 2000 U.S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, Jun. 15, 2000, NREL/CP-570-28890. |
Low Cost, Compact Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Generator, NASA Small Business Innovation Research Program. |
Low Cost, High Efficiency Reversible Fuel Cell (and Electrolyzer) Systems, Proceedings of the 2001 DOE Hydrogen Program Review NREL/CP-570-30535. |
Low Cost, High Efficiency Reversible Fuel Cell Systems, Proceedings of the 2002 U.S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, NREL/CP-610-32405. |
Power Generation and Steam Electrolysis Characteristics of an Electrochemical Cell with a Zirconia- or Ceria-based Electrode, K. Eguchi, et al, Solid State Ionics, 86 88 (1996) 1245-1249. |
Regenerative Fuel Cells for High Altitude Long Endurance Solar Powered Aircraft, F. Mitlitsky, et al, 28th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), Jul. 28, 1993, UCRL-JC-113485. |
Small, Ultra Efficient Fuel Cell Systems, Advanced Technology Program ATP 2001 Competition (Jun. 2002). |
S. Park et al., Direct oxidation of hydrocarbons in a solid-oxide fuel cell, Letters to Nature, Mar. 2000, vol. 404, pp. 265-267. |
S. Park et al., Tape Cast Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for the Direct Oxidation of Hydrocarbons, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2001, vol. 148, No. 5, pp. A443-A447. |
Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cells for Solar Rechargeable Aircraft and Zero Emission Vehicles, F. Mitlitsky, et al, 1994 Fuel Cell Seminar, Sep. 6, 1994, UCRL-JC-117130. |
Search Report & Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/012671. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200880115166.0, mailed Jul. 11, 2012. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200880115166.0, mailed on Feb. 21, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120028162 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61129882 | Jul 2008 | US | |
61129759 | Jul 2008 | US | |
60996352 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12292151 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 13268233 | US |