The present invention relates to an electrolytic reduction technique for performing a proton or gas reduction reaction.
A conventional electrolytic reduction device is configured such that an oxidation tank in which an oxidation electrode is immersed in an aqueous solution and a reduction tank in which a reduction electrode is immersed in an aqueous solution are connected via a proton exchange membrane, and carbon dioxide is constantly supplied to the reduction tank via a tube. By connecting a power source between the electrodes and applying a constant DC voltage which has a value high enough for reactions of the oxidation electrode and the reduction electrode to proceed, protons and carbon dioxides are reduced on the reduction electrode side to produce hydrogen, carbon oxide, methane, ethylene, methanol, ethanol, and formic acid.
Non-Patent Literature 1: Y. Hori, et al., “Formation of Hydrocarbons in the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at a Copper Electrode in Aqueous Solution”, Journal of the Chemical Society, 1989, 85(8), 2309-2326
Non-Patent Literature 2: H. Zhong, et al., “Effect of KHCO3 Concentration on Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 on Copper Electrode”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2017, 164(9), F923-F927
However, in the conventional electrolytic reduction device, there is a problem that, when the reaction proceeds, ions such as protons and HCOO− are adsorbed on the surface of the reduction electrode, and these ions reduce a reaction area of the reduction electrode and suppress the reduction reaction. In order to improve the efficiency of the reduction reaction, it is necessary to desorb ions adsorbed on the surface of the reduction electrode and reduce the loss of the reaction surface area of the reduction electrode.
The present invention has been made in view of the above, and aims to improve the efficiency of the reduction reaction.
An electrolytic reduction device according to the present invention passes an electric current between an oxidation electrode and a reduction electrode to cause a reduction reaction in the reduction electrode, and includes an oxidation tank for immersing and disposing the oxidation electrode in an aqueous solution, a reduction tank for immersing and disposing the reduction electrode in an aqueous solution, a proton exchange membrane disposed between the oxidation tank and the reduction tank, and a power source connected to the oxidation electrode and the reduction electrode, in which the power source applies a voltage to the oxidation electrode and the reduction electrode, the voltage having a voltage value that changes with a predetermined cycle to be a voltage value at which ions can be desorbed from a surface of the oxidation electrode and a surface of the reduction electrode during one cycle of the voltage change.
An electrolytic reduction method according to the present invention passes an electric current between an oxidation electrode and a reduction electrode to cause a reduction reaction in the reduction electrode, and a voltage is applied to the oxidation electrode and the reduction electrode, the voltage having a voltage value that changes with a predetermined cycle to be a voltage value at which ions can be desorbed from a surface of the oxidation electrode and a surface of the reduction electrode during one cycle of the voltage change.
According to the present invention, the efficiency of the reduction reaction can be improved.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The present invention is not limited to the following examples, and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
An aqueous solution 12 is put in the oxidation tank 10, and the oxidation electrode 11 is immersed in the aqueous solution 12. The oxidation electrode 11 is electrically connected to the power source 50 by a conductor wire 51. For the oxidation electrode 11, for example, platinum, gold, silver, copper, indium, and nickel can be used. As the aqueous solution 12, for example, an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, an aqueous solution of potassium chloride, and an aqueous solution of sodium chloride can be used.
An aqueous solution 22 is put into the reduction tank 20, and the reduction electrode 21 is immersed in the aqueous solution 22. The reduction electrode 21 is electrically connected to the power source 50 by the conductor wire 51. The reduction electrode 21 is a plate-like metal, for which copper, gold, platinum, silver, palladium, gallium, indium, nickel, tin, and cadmium can be used, for example. The reduction electrode 21 may be a wire mesh or an electrode substrate obtained by applying particulate metal particles to a conductive substrate. As the aqueous solution 22, for example, an aqueous solution of potassium hydrogen carbonate, an aqueous solution of potassium chloride, and an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide can be used.
For the proton exchange membrane 30, for example, Nafion (registered trademark) can be used. Nafion is a perfluorocarbon material composed of a hydrophobic Teflon skeleton formed of carbon-fluorine and a perfluoro side chain having a sulfonic acid group.
The tube 40 supplies carbon dioxide from near the bottom of the reduction tank 20. By changing the gas supplied to the reduction tank 20, it is possible to generate hydrogen by a proton reduction or ammonia by a nitrogen reduction reaction.
The power source 50 only needs to apply a predetermined AC voltage to the oxidation electrode 11 and the reduction electrode 21. For example, the power source 50 may be a combination of a function generator and an amplifier.
Consider a voltage when hydrogen is generated using an aqueous solution having a pH of 13.0 in the oxidation tank 10 and an aqueous solution having a pH of 8.5 in the reduction tank 20. At the oxidation electrode 11, an oxidation reaction of water (2H2O→O2+4H++4e−) is generated. The oxidation reaction potential in the aqueous solution having a pH of 13.0 is approximately 0.46 V vs. SHE (Standard Hydrogen Electrode). At the reduction electrode 21, a proton reduction reaction (2H++2e−→H2) is generated. The reduction reaction potential in the aqueous solution having a pH of 8.5 is approximately −0.50 V vs. SHE. Therefore, it is understood that an applied voltage of approximately 0.96 V or more is required in principle to advance the oxidation-reduction reaction for the purpose of hydrogen generation.
In the present embodiment, as shown in
As for the applied voltage, it should be noted that a voltage having a periodic rectangular waveform as shown in
When the setting condition of AC voltage is changed, selectivity of types of the generated gas (CO, HCOOH, CH4, C2H4, and the like) can be controlled.
An electrolytic reduction device 1 of
Next, an example of the electrolytic reduction device of the present embodiment and a comparative example in which a DC voltage is applied will be described.
In the example, an external power source (a combination of a 1287 type potentiogalvanostat and a 1260 type impedance analyzer manufactured by Solartron) was connected to the oxidation electrode 11 and the reduction electrode 21 of the electrolytic reduction device 1 shown in
Platinum (produced by The Nilaco Corporation) was used for the oxidation electrode 11, which was installed in the oxidation tank 10 such that approximately 0.55 cm2 of the surface area was immersed in the aqueous solution 12.
The aqueous solution 12 was a 1 mol/l aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide.
As the reduction electrode 21, a copper plate (produced by The Nilaco Corporation) was used whose surface was washed with pure water and dried after being cut into 2 cm×3 cm. The reduction electrode 21 was installed such that the copper plate as a whole was immersed in the aqueous solution 22.
The aqueous solution 22 was a 0.5 mol/l aqueous solution of potassium hydrogen carbonate.
Nafion (registered trademark) was used for the proton exchange membrane 30.
Carbon dioxide was supplied to the reduction tank 20 through the tube 40 at a flow rate of 20 ml/min and at a pressure of 0.18 MPa.
The aqueous solution was stirred by rotating a stirring bar at a speed of 250 rpm in the center of the bottom of each reaction tank.
After supplying helium to the oxidation tank 10 and carbon dioxide to the reduction tank 20, which is followed by sufficient substitution, an AC voltage was applied to the oxidation electrode 11 and the reduction electrode 21 to pass an electric current.
Gases in the oxidation tank 10 and the reduction tank 20 were collected at an arbitrary time during the voltage application, and the reaction products were analyzed with a gas chromatograph. It was confirmed that oxygen was generated in the oxidation tank 10. It was confirmed that hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane, and ethylene were generated in the reduction tank 20.
A comparative example differs from the example in that the voltage applied to the oxidation electrode 11 and the reduction electrode 21 was a DC voltage of 3.0 V. Otherwise, the comparative example was the same as the example.
When the reduction reaction products were measured during the voltage application in the example, the efficiency of proton and carbon dioxide reductions was improved as compared with the comparative example. Table 1 below shows current values during the voltage application as well as the Faraday efficiency of material generation by proton and carbon dioxide reductions in the example and the comparative example. The Faraday efficiency indicates a ratio of a current value used for a reduction reaction with respect to a current value passing through a conductor wire during the voltage application.
In the example, the current value increased approximately 10 times compared to the comparative example, and the Faraday efficiency was comparable. This indicates that the reduction reaction products such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane, and ethylene increased approximately 10 times.
As described above, according to the present embodiment, the power source 50 applies a voltage to the oxidation electrode 11 immersed in the aqueous solution 12 in the oxidation tank 10 and the reduction electrode 21 immersed in the aqueous solution 22 in the reduction tank 20, which has a voltage value that changes with a predetermined cycle to be a voltage value at which ions can be desorbed from a surface of the oxidation electrode 11 and a surface of the reduction electrode 21 during one cycle of the voltage change, so that ions absorbed on the surface of the reduction electrode 21 can be desorbed and the loss of the reaction surface area of the reduction electrode 21 can be reduced, thereby enabling improvement in the efficiency of the electrolytic reduction reaction of protons or carbon dioxides.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2018-098084 | May 2018 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2019/019634 | 5/17/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/225495 | 11/28/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3449225 | Matzner | Jun 1969 | A |
20120018311 | Yotsuhashi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120067719 | Lagos Lehuede | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H08-296077 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2019-203193 | Nov 2019 | JP |
20180020763 | Feb 2018 | KR |
WO 9858452 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shiratsuchi et al, Pulsed Electroreduction of CO2 on Copper Electrodes, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 140, No. 12, Dec. 1993, pp. 3479-3482 (Year: 1993). |
Kimura et al, Controlled Selectivity of CO2 Reduction on Copper by Pulsing the Electrochemical Potential, Chem SUS Chem, vol. 11, No. 11, May 2018, pp. 1781-1786 (Year: 2018). |
Yano et al, Pulse-mode electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using copper and copper oxide electrodes for selective ethylene formation, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 38, Jul. 2008, pp. 1721-1726 (Year: 2008). |
International Search Report dated Jul. 16, 2019, issued in PCT Application No. PCT/JP2019/019634, filed May 17, 2019. |
Y. Hori et al., Formation of Hydrocarbons in the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at a Cooper Electrode in Aqueous Solution, Journal of the Chemical Society Faraday Transactions, No. 85(8), 1989, pp. 2309-2326. |
H. Zhong et al., Effect of KHCO3 Concentration of Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 on Copper Electrode, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 164, No. 9, 2017, pp. F923-F927. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210198796 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |