This application is a National Stage completion of PCT/EP2009/051535 filed Feb. 11, 2009, which claims priority from German patent application serial no. 10 2008 000 534.7 filed Mar. 6, 2008.
The invention concerns an electromagnetic control mechanism.
Electromagnetic control devices, also referred to as actors or actuators, control motors or displacement magnets, are widely known in control technology. For example, they serve to drive or actuate control valves or flap gates for controlling the through-flow of gaseous or liquid media. Most electromagnetic actuators are bistable, i.e. they have only two stable positions, for example ‘on’ or ‘off’.
From DE 103 10 448 A1 a bistable actuator is known, which comprises two coils and an armature formed as a permanent magnet arranged on an armature rod. The polarity of the permanent magnet is orientated along the displacement direction of the armature, and the permanent magnet is held by the coils either in one or the other of its end positions. The coil configuration in this case forms a two-pole system, whereby the permanent magnet is attracted by one coil and at the same time repelled by the other coil, and vice-versa. This shortens the switching time.
From DE 102 07 828 A1 a bistable electromagnetic displacement magnet is known, whose polarity is orientated radially, i.e. transversely to the movement direction of the armature.
Besides bistable actuators, tristable actuators are also known: from DE 1 892 313 U a displacement electromagnet with three stable positions, namely two outer end positions and a central position, is known. The displacement electromagnet comprises a total of four coils, two stationary permanent magnets, two outer housing-antipoles, two inner housing-antipoles and two armatures that can move longitudinally on a push-rod. In each case an end position is reached by energizing an outer coil, the armatures being attracted by the energized coil. In contrast, the central position of the push-rod is reached when the armatures are held by the permanent magnets, which are in contact on both sides against the inner housing-antipoles (partition wall). The disadvantage of this known displacement electromagnet are that it comprises a large number of parts, namely four coils, two permanent magnets and two armatures, which also make for substantial extra weight.
The purpose of the present invention is to provide an inexpensive electromagnetic control mechanism of the type mentioned at the start, which is of simple design and comprises a smaller number of individual components.
According to the invention, it is provided that the actuating element consists of an actuator rod with a permanent magnet arranged on it, and in its third stable position the actuating element can be held by the magnetic flux of the permanent magnet. This gives the advantages that the central position is maintained without the coils having to be energized, and that fewer parts are involved.
In an advantageous design the two coils are respectively arranged at the ends of a pole tube, i.e. a tube made from magnetic material, and each coil has a yoke, preferably made from a ferromagnetic material. In this way the magnetic flux passes through the yoke and the pole tube, so that depending on the way the coils are energized different polarities can be produced.
In a further advantageous design the actuator rod is arranged coaxially with the pole tube and is mounted so that it can slide within openings of the yokes. Associated with the permanent magnet is a preferably annular holding pole, which is preferably arranged inside the pole tube approximately in the middle thereof between the two coils. The holding pole is made from a magnetic material and in the third stable position, i.e. the central position of the armature, the magnetic flux of the permanent magnet passes through it. Owing to the closed magnetic circuit between the holding pole and the permanent magnet, the actuating element is held in place magnetically without having to energize the coils.
To strengthen the magnetic flux of the permanent magnet, flux plates can be attached on the end faces of the permanent magnet. It is also advantageous to apply anti-adhesion disks on the flux plates, which prevent the permanent magnet from sticking to the coil yokes.
In another advantageous design, plunger-type armatures preferably of conical shape are provided on the end faces of the permanent magnet, which project into corresponding openings in the coil yokes. This increases the magnetic attraction force exerted by the coils on the actuating element.
In a further advantageous design, the polarity of the permanent magnet is orientated along the displacement direction of the actuating element and the actuator rod. Thus, a north pole is formed on one end face of the permanent magnet and a south pole on its opposite end face. Thus, depending on the manner in which the coils are energized, a force of attraction and/or a force of repulsion can be exerted on the permanent magnet so that it is pushed to one or the other end position.
In a further advantageous design an additional coil, a so-termed central coil, can be arranged in the area of the holding pole, which, when it is appropriately energized, cancels the retaining action of the permanent magnet in its central position and so allows more rapid movement of the actuating element to one or other of its end positions. This improves the dynamic response of the actuator.
An example embodiment of the invention is illustrated in the drawing and will be described in more detail below. The drawings show:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 000 534 | Mar 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/051535 | 2/11/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/28/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/109444 | 9/11/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3070730 | Gray et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3202886 | Kramer | Aug 1965 | A |
3504320 | Engdahl et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
4422060 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4494098 | Haneda et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4533890 | Patel | Aug 1985 | A |
4829947 | Lequesne | May 1989 | A |
4870306 | Petersen | Sep 1989 | A |
4928028 | Leibovich | May 1990 | A |
5434549 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5820104 | Koyano et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5896076 | van Namen | Apr 1999 | A |
5947155 | Miki et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6472968 | Ohya | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6983923 | Fukui et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7347221 | Berger et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7482902 | Kampf et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20050046531 | Moyer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060130785 | Han et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080290972 | Jotter et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 892 313 | May 1964 | DE |
34 00 264 | Jul 1984 | DE |
34 02 768 | Aug 1985 | DE |
44 00 433 | Jul 1995 | DE |
102 07 828 | Sep 2003 | DE |
103 10 448 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10 2004 004 708 | Apr 2005 | DE |
258 725 | Sep 1926 | GB |
2 052 886 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2 104 730 | Mar 1983 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110001591 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |