The invention relates to an electromagnetic actuator comprising a wire coil, an armature and a catch, wherein the armature can be moved in an actuation direction, and wherein the catch secures the armature within the electromagnetic actuator.
Electromagnetic actuators often comprise a wire coil and an armature that is located inside the wire coil and can be moved in an actuation direction by running a current through the wire coil. In order to avoid that the armature falls out of the wire coil, an extra part can be mounted to the wire coil. As many actuators also comprises a spring that biases the armature against the actuation direction, a second option to keep the armature and the wire coil together would be to fix the spring to the armature on one end and to the wire coil on the other end.
However, mounting an extra part increases the size of the actuator and connecting the wire coil and the armature via the spring does not provide a reliable stop. Therefore, the problem to be solved is to provide a stopping mechanism that has a reliable stopping characteristic and does not increase the size of the actuator.
The present invention solves this problem by using a catch that secures the armature within the electromagnetic actuator, wherein the catch is located inside the electromagnetic actuator.
Locating the catch inside the actuator does not increase the size of the electromagnetic actuator, but still gives a defined stopping characteristic. Further, as the catch is located at the inside, it cannot be damaged in rough environments. Furthermore, as the shape of the actuator does not change, an actuator comprising a catch on the inside can be mounted to the same basis as an electromagnetic actuator without the catch.
The solution according to the invention may be combined as desired with the following further advantageous improvements.
The electromagnetic actuator can have an insertion direction along which the armature is inserted into the electromagnetic actuator during assembly and against which the armature is secured by the catch. The armature can easily be mounted by simply introducing the armature into the electromagnetic actuator. After assembly, the armature is secured against falling out, for example during transport or when handling the electromagnetic actuator.
It is advantageous if the actuation direction is the insertion direction, as in this case the assembly of the armature to the electromagnetic actuator can be simply done by inserting the armature without further steps e.g. relocating the armature.
The electromagnetic actuator can further comprise a tube that is located between the armature and the wire coil. Such a tube has the advantage that it reduces the friction between the armature and the wire coil. The tube can either be fixed to the wire coil or to the armature or it can be mounted loosely between the two. Preferably, the tube is made from a material that has a low friction coefficient. In order to keep manufacturing costs low, the tube can be made from a sheet material that is rolled, bent or deepdrawn. If the tube is made from a plastic material, it could easily be produced by injection molding.
In an advantageous development, the tube comprises a tongue that acts as a catch. As the tube is located between the wire coil and the armature, a catch, located on the tube results in a direct contact between the two. For example, if the tube is fixed to the wire coil, such a tongue can engage in a recess located on the armature.
The tongue can be stamped or cut out from the tube in order to save costs.
In a preferred embodiment, the catch has a first shoulder that engages with a second shoulder, the second shoulder being located on the armature. Although the first and the second shoulder might be located on the wire coil and a tube that is attached to the armature, locating the second shoulder on the armature is advantageous, as in this case the mass that is moved is kept at a minimum, which reduces the force applied to the shoulders during the catching process. Further, if little mass has to be moved, the response time of the actuator can be shorter.
The first and/or the second shoulder can be located on a recess and/or a protrusion. A recess might be for example a hole, a groove or an opening. A protrusion could be a step or a tongue. For instance, the first and second shoulder could each be located on a protrusion. In a preferred embodiment, a recess is located on the armature and a shoulder located on the tube or the wire coil engages in the recess of the armature.
In an advantageous development, the first and/or the second shoulder extends along a circumferential direction around the actuation direction. This allows a partial rotation of the armature relative to the wire coil. Preferably, the first and/or the second shoulder extends along the entire circumference around the actuation direction. In this case, the armature can rotate freely inside the wire coil. An armature with a shoulder along the entire circumference can be manufactured easily by turning.
In a further advantageous development, the catch is integrally formed with a component of the electromagnetic actuator, the component being the armature, the wire coil, a tube or a bobbin. However, the catch can also be formed integral with further components. Such a one-piece design of the catch together with a component of the actuator can save costs, as no additional components have to be manufactured and/or mounted. Furthermore, such a compact design can save space in and on the actuator.
It is advantageous if the catch is elastic or elastically deflectable in a direction perpendicular to the actuation direction. For example, the catch might snap into a recess, which allows an easy mounting process in one direction but prevents the armature from falling out in the other direction. During assembly, the armature can be inserted into the actuator by deflecting the catch and, in the assembled state, the catch secures the armature inside the actuator.
The invention will be described hereinafter in greater detail and in an exemplary manner using advantageous embodiments and with reference to the drawings. The described embodiments are only possible configurations in which, however, the individual features as described above can be provided independently of one another or can be omitted.
In the drawings:
The armature 3 can be moved in the actuation direction A by running a current through the wire coil 2. The spring 5 biases the armature 3 against the actuation direction A. The yoke 6 can help to increase and direct the magnetic field induced by the current running through the wire coil 2. Further, the yoke 6 can serve to increase the stability of the electromagnetic actuator 1. A housing 7 can serve to protect the electromagnetic actuator 1 and/or can be part of a mounting assembly used to mount the electromagnetic actuator 1.
The actuation direction A is also the insertion direction M along which the armature 3 was inserted into the electromagnetic actuator 1 during assembly.
The electromagnetic actuator 1 further comprises a catch 8 that engages with a recess 9 of the armature 3. In this example, the catch 8 is part of the tube 4. The tube 4 is fixed to the yoke 6. The armature 3 can move within the tube 4 but its movement in the actuation direction A is limited by the catch 8. The catch 8 thus secures the armature 3 within the electromagnetic actuator 1 and prevents the armature from falling out.
The recess 9 extends along the entire circumference of the armature 3. The catch 8 is formed as a tongue 8a in the tube 4 and in this example does not extend around the actuation direction A along an entire circumference. The tongue 8a is formed by stamping out a part of the tube 4. The tube 4 has been produced by rolling a piece of sheet metal and joining the ends together, for example by welding or soldering. However, the tube 4 could also be formed by injection molding if the tube is made from a plastic material.
The figure shows the wire coil 2a and the bobbin 2b on top. The tube 4 is located between the wire coil 2 and the armature 3. The catch 8 in the form of a tongue 8a engages with a recess 9 of the armature 3 and blocks a movement of the armature 3 against an actuation direction A. The tongue 8a has been stamped out of a piece of metal sheet before the tube 4 has been rolled into its circular shape. Further, the tongue 8a has been bent inwards in order to engage with the recess 9 of the armature 3. A first shoulder 10a of the catch 8 engages with a second shoulder 10b located on the armature 3 and thus blocks the movement. As the armature 3 is the only moveable part, the actuator 1 can have a fast response time with a low consumption of power.
The tongue 8a is elastically deflectable in the deflection direction D which is perpendicular to the actuation direction A. This allows an easy assembling process, as the armature 3 can be introduced into the wire coil 2 in the actuation direction A. When the first shoulder 10a passes the second shoulder 10b, the catch 8 snaps into the recess 9 of the armature 3 and secures the armature 3 within the actuator 1.
In
In this case, two catches 8 engage in the recess 9 of the armature 3. This prevents the armature 3 from tilting within the actuator 1 and gives a better force distribution with smaller forces acting on the catches 8. However, any number of catches is possible.
In this case, the tube 4 serves to minimize the friction and acts as a guiding surface during the movement of the armature 3 in the actuation direction A.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11193079 | Dec 2011 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2324642 | Peterson | Jul 1943 | A |
2952756 | Lanctot | Sep 1960 | A |
4044324 | Coors | Aug 1977 | A |
4339109 | Kawata et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4462013 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4539542 | Clark | Sep 1985 | A |
4540154 | Kolchinsky et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4683454 | Vollmer et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4694270 | Ichihashi | Sep 1987 | A |
RE32783 | Clark | Nov 1988 | E |
4801910 | Ayers et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4983941 | Tanaka | Jan 1991 | A |
5208570 | Nippert | May 1993 | A |
5497135 | Wisskirchen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5890876 | Suito et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5950605 | Hussey et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960776 | Everingham et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964578 | Suitou et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6036447 | Kawaguchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6229421 | Floyd et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6377146 | Batteux | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6677842 | Hanke et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6799746 | Schafer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7414502 | Tackes et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7557681 | Whitaker et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7598830 | Bogdon et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20070120081 | Huang | May 2007 | A1 |
20090021334 | Okada | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29903873 | Jun 1999 | DE |
102007039148 | Feb 2009 | DE |
102008056777 | May 2010 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Search Report issued by the European Patent Office, dated Feb. 16, 2012, for related European Patent No. 11193079.8; 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130147584 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |