The present invention relates generally to electrical cables and, in particular, to a cable with electromagnetic and/or anti-ballistic shielding.
There are extensive publications detailing the concern over the effects of an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). In short, an electromagnetic pulse may generate a voltage and resulting current or signals in cables that may damage electronic equipment connected to the cables.
There is a large concern about a naturally occurring EMP from solar activity. One of the articles referred to the magnetic storms that occur naturally on the sun as being inevitable and not “if they would occur but when they would occur.” Although written in 2008 the article goes on to say that we are currently entering a period of “increased solar activity”. While the article does characterize the events as 100 year events they go on to report that major storms have occurred in 1859, 1921 and the 1989 storm that affected Hydro-Quebec shutting of power to 6 million customers.
There is also a large concern about the impact of a nuclear event, a device detonated high in the atmosphere—no blast, no radiation, no shock but a flood of electromagnetic fields. It is referred to as an HEMP attack (High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse). Large areas of geography would be affected and have the same effect as the solar activity that occurs naturally but may be more pointed and focused. This type of attack is also called an IEMI (Intentional Electromagnetic Interference).
A subset of the IEMI (intentional interference) is the small man made magnetic pulse generators. These units can be small enough to actually fit in a suitcase, all be it that unit would have limited power, but the magazine Popular Science recently discussed how a pulse generator that could fit in a cargo van and powered by car batteries could be fashioned using readily available technology and parts and, in fact, a unit like this could be made to press the attack over a broad range of frequencies for extended time. This is a point of use device, which is particularly hazardous because, if it is found by the saboteur to be non-effective, the van or other vehicle carrying the device simply drives away with no one the wiser. The would-be saboteur is thus left to fight another day.
Since 1989 the European community recognized the threat and initiated research and publication of standards through the IEC (International Electro-Technical Commission)—this group has published an extensive set of standards and guidelines categorizing the various forms of EMP and defining the phenomena in engineering terms—organizing it for study and regulation. The standards cover General; Environmental (the electrical environment of the pulse); testing and measuring; installation guidelines; and generic standards for immunity.
In the United States, the organizing group has been the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers). The IEEE has a number of “sections'” including an EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility) section. Many of the members that are involved in the IEC are also members and committee chairmen of the various IEEE/EMC working groups. The IEEE/EMC working groups have also published guidelines and technical papers on preparation, mitigation, etc.
An additional issue involves not the threat of magnetic fields from outside of a cable but rather a concern that the small magnetic fields associated with data signals that emanate from inside the cable can be “read” from the outside. This is a recognized security breach.
Furthermore, the recent attention to terrorist activities and the shooting activities at an electrical substation a number of years ago in California spurred the drive to design an electrical cable designed to specifically withstand a certain level of ballistic attack. It would be desirable for such an anti-ballistic cable to withstand one or more discharged rounds of a firearm.
A need exists for a cable that addresses at least some of the above issues.
The following presents a general summary of aspects of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of the invention and various features of it. This summary is not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way, but it simply provides a general overview and context for the more detailed description that follows.
In general, aspects of this invention relate to electrical cables and, in particular, to a cable with electromagnetic and/or anti-ballistic shielding. According to one aspect, a cable may comprise: a conductor; a continuous metallic sheath surrounding the conductor; and a supplemental sheath layer surrounding the metallic sheath. The supplemental sheath layer may include a copper mesh material. The supplemental sheath layer may include aluminum polyester tape. The continuous metallic sheath may be made of a material selected from the group consisting of steel, aluminum and copper. The continuous metallic sheath may have a thickness ranging from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm.
According to another aspect, a cable may comprise: a conductor; an armor layer surrounding the conductor; a fabric layer surrounding the conductor; and a polymer layer surrounding the conductor. The fabric layer may include a synthetic material. The armor layer may surround the synthetic material fabric layer. The cable may further comprise a polymer compound extruded between the conductor and the synthetic material fabric layer. The cable may also comprise a polymer layer surrounding the conductor. The cable may also further comprise a high-density polyolefin layer as an outer-most layer.
According to another aspect, a cable may comprise: a conductor; an inner synthetic strength member surrounding the conductor; a polymer compound positioned between the conductor and the inner synthetic strength member; a polymer layer surrounding the inner synthetic strength member; an armor layer surrounding the polymer layer; an outer synthetic strength member surrounding the armor layer; and a polyolefin layer surrounding the outer synthetic strength member. The polyolefin layer may be a high-density polyolefin. The polymer compound between the conductor and the inner synthetic strength member may be extruded.
A more complete understanding of the present invention and certain advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following detailed description in consideration with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The reader is advised that the attached drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
In the following description of various example structures in accordance with the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration various example adjustment members, golf club heads, and golf club structures in accordance with the invention. Additionally, it is to be understood that other specific arrangements of parts and structures may be utilized, and structural and functional modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Nothing in this specification should be construed as requiring a specific three dimensional or spatial orientation of structures in order to fall within the scope of this invention.
For anti-ballistic capability, the design of the cable depends on a layering of different impact absorbing materials including, but not limited to armor (aluminum or steel), energy absorbing fabric and energy absorbing homogeneous or foamed layers of various polymers. The materials are laid up in various combinations and permutations including, but not limited to, those illustrated and described below.
An embodiment of the cable of the present invention is indicated in general at 10 in
The order and number of layers presented in
In addition to, or alternatively, embodiments of cable systems of the present invention are designed to mitigate or eliminate the transfer of magnetic fields in either direction with respect to the cable core. In other words, the cables are electromagnetic pulse (EMP) shielded.
In accordance with some embodiments of the present invention, a cable system (cable, fitting, accessories and preparation) provides proper electromagnetic pulse (EMP) shielding without joints, seams or cracks that would otherwise allow the propagation of magnetic fields. In addition, some embodiments provide proper grounding to allow any induced signal a low resistance path to ground.
In some embodiments, the cable is completely covered in a continuous sheath of metal, such as armor layer 22 of
In alternative embodiments, the cable may include an additional or supplemental sheath layer (in addition to armor layer 22) over the core of the cable made of a material such as, for example, copper mesh or aluminum polyester tape.
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention.
While the invention has been described in detail in terms of specific examples including presently preferred modes of carrying out the invention, those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are numerous variations and permutations of the above described systems and methods. Thus, the spirit and scope of the invention should be construed broadly as set forth in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/136,434, filed Apr. 22, 2016, entitled ELECTROMAGNETIC AND ANTI-BALLISTIC SHIELDED CABLE, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/151,153, filed Apr. 22, 2015, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2186793 | Wodtke | Jan 1940 | A |
2320313 | Thomas et al. | May 1943 | A |
2800524 | Van Lear | Jul 1957 | A |
3349169 | Lucien | Oct 1967 | A |
3529340 | Polizzano et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3576388 | Bruns | Apr 1971 | A |
3643004 | McKean | Feb 1972 | A |
4025715 | Foley et al. | May 1977 | A |
4312260 | Morieras | Jan 1982 | A |
4894488 | Gupta | Jan 1990 | A |
5043530 | Davies | Aug 1991 | A |
5119457 | Callahan | Jun 1992 | A |
5220130 | Walters | Jun 1993 | A |
5270486 | Chan et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5477011 | Singles et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
6028975 | Davidson | Feb 2000 | A |
6255594 | Hudson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6326551 | Adams | Dec 2001 | B1 |
20030138628 | Castellani et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030164483 | Scelza et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050183878 | Herbort et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20100186990 | Neuroth et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110088944 | Ogue | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20140262427 | Brown et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180308605 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62151153 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15136434 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15948623 | US |