This application is a United States National Phase Patent Application of, and claims the benefit of, International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2007/050481 which was filed on Aug. 10, 2007, and which claims priority to British Patent Application No. 06270081.0, which was filed on Aug. 18, 2006, and which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 0616391.9, which was filed on Aug. 18, 2006, the disclosures of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to electromagnetic band-gap structures and in particular, but not exclusively, to an improved structure operable as a high impedance surface for use in low-profile antenna applications operating with electromagnetic radiation in the frequency range 100 MHz to 1 GHz.
In an arrangement, discussed for example by D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. F. J. Broas, N. G. Alexopolous and E. Yablonovitch in “High-Impedance Electromagnetic Surfaces with a Forbidden Frequency Band,” IEEE Trans. On Microwave Theory and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 11, November 1999, a high impedance surface has been created using a structure in the form if a close-packed periodic array of square-topped “thumb tack” or mushroom-shaped metal elements connected a ground plane surface by means of vias. A representation of the structure of Sievenpiper et al. is shown in
If the structure described by Sievenpiper et al. were to be scaled up in size to be suitable for use with signals in the range of 100 MHz to 1 GHz, the result would be a bulky and heavy structure.
From a first aspect, the present invention resides in a electromagnetic band-gap structure, including:
an electrically conducting ground plane; and
a periodic planar arrangement of electrically conducting surface elements mounted parallel to and at a predetermined distance from the ground plane,
wherein each of the surface elements is supported in said planar arrangement by at least one electrically conducting support element extending from an edge of the surface element to the ground plane and wherein for no two adjacent surface elements are their respective support elements disposed in a parallel back-to-back arrangement.
Electromagnetic band-gap structures according to this first aspect of the present invention include a periodic array of unit cells, each unit cell including at least one electrically conducting surface element of a close-packing shape supported at its edge and electrically connected to an electrically conducting ground plane by at least one electrically conducting support element. The support elements are placed so that for no two adjacent surface elements are their support elements arranged in close proximity to one another in a parallel back-to-back arrangement. This has the advantage that undesirable or unpredictable effects affecting the performance of the structure as a high impedance surface at a desired frequency may be avoided. Support elements of adjacent surface elements may be arranged parallel to one another so long as they are placed apart, for example at non-adjacent edges of the adjacent surface elements.
Advantageously, this particularly simple form of structure enables a high impedance surface to be constructed much more easily and with less expense than known high impedance surfaces designed for use in the frequency range of 100 MHz to 1 GHz.
The surface elements may all be of the same close-packing shape. Close packing shapes that may be used where all the surface elements are of the same shape include triangles, squares and hexagons. However, in an alternative embodiment, a mixture of different shapes may be used to achieve a close-packed arrangement of surface elements. In an example that makes use of two different shapes for the surface elements, a periodic arrangement of octagons and squares may be used. Of course any periodic combination of shapes may in theory be used that results in a close-packed arrangement of surface elements. However, there may be a corresponding reduction in the ease of manufacture of structures using more complex arrangements of shapes.
In the arrangement of Sievenpiper et al. for example, as shown in
Where the support elements are square, the support elements of any two adjacent surface elements may be disposed at right angles to one another. This provides for a more uniform structure.
Electromagnetic band-gap structures according to the first aspect of the present invention may be designed for use with electromagnetic signals in the frequency range 100 MHz to 1 GHz.
From a second aspect, the present invention resides in an antenna, including an antenna element mounted on an electromagnetic band-gap structure defined according to the first aspect above, wherein the electromagnetic band-gap structure is arranged to operate as a high impedance surface at an operating frequency of the antenna and hence as a ground plane for the antenna.
Advantageously, structures according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention are structurally and electromagnetically similar in more than one direction, for example in the x direction and the y direction, parallel to the edges of the surface elements in the case of square surface elements. Thus a dipole antenna would be substantially unaffected by its mounting orientation on the surface of the structure, enabling crossed dipole antennae to be mounted for example.
Structures according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be filled with a light-weight dielectric foam material in order to increase their robustness and rigidity without adding significantly to their weight. This is of particular advantage in those embodiments in which surface elements are supported by only one edge.
From a third aspect, the present invention resides in a low-profile antenna, including an antenna as defined according to the second aspect above, further including an antenna element mounted parallel to and at a level substantially coincident with the plane of surface elements in the electromagnetic band-gap structure.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been designed to provide a high-impedance surface to electromagnetic radiation at selected frequencies in the range 100 MHz to 1 GHz in particular. These EBG structures are particularly suited for application to low-profile antennae in which they are used to provide a ground plane. At frequencies in the range 100 MHz to 1 GHz, known high-impedance surfaces require large and heavy structures. However, exemplary embodiments of the present invention aim to provide a light-weight structure and one that is simple and inexpensive to make.
An EBG structure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to
Referring to
The EBG structure 200 operates on the basis of a parallel resonant LC circuit in which resonance occurs when ω02=1/LC. The basis of operation of the EBG structure 200 as a high-impedance surface can be understood in more detail with reference to
Referring to
In an application of the EBG structure 200, the structure 200 is required to behave as a high impedance surface at the frequency of operation of an antenna and so provide a suitable ground plane to enable a low-profile antenna to be constructed, as will now be described with reference to
Referring to
By way of example, if a low-profile antenna structure 400 is required for operation with signals of frequency 432 MHz, then the EBG structure is required to have a band-gap at 432 MHz in which the phase of its reflection coefficient is 0°, so imitating the behavior of a perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) at that frequency. To achieve this with a 5×5 unit cell EBG structure as shown in
Conventionally, a radiating dipole antenna would need to be mounted approximately 174 mm above a perfect electric conductor (PEC) ground plane for operation at 432 MHz. Hence, mounting the antenna 420 above an EBG structure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention reduces the overall height of the antenna by approximately 94 mm in this particular example.
Conveniently, each of the unit cells of the EBG structure 200 of
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Whereas the EBG structures 200, 400, 700 in exemplary embodiments of the present invention use square surface elements 205, 405, 605, close-packing shapes other than squares may also be used for the surface elements, as would be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in this field. In particular, periodic arrangements of triangular or hexagonal surface elements may be used with various arrangements of support elements to connect them to a ground plane. Alternatively, close-packed arrangements may be realized with combinations of surface elements of different shapes, for example octagons and squares. In a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an arrangement based upon the use of hexagonal surface elements will now be described with reference to
Referring to
In the EBG structure 800 of
Referring to
As will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the relevant field, templates of other designs may be made to create alternative arrangements of surface elements and their respective support elements, according to the shape or shapes of surface elements required. Furthermore, unit cells including different numbers of surface elements to those unit cells defined above may be chosen and the corresponding templates designed for their manufacture.
An exemplary antenna element 405 for use in a low profile antenna as described above with reference to
Referring to
Other types of antenna may also be used in conjunction with electromagnetic band-gap structures according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention. For example, in the antenna shown in
While electromagnetic band-gap structures according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention are particularly suited for use in low-profile antennae, antennae that do make use of these structures are not limited to being of the low-profile type.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06270081 | Aug 2006 | EP | regional |
0616391.9 | Aug 2006 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2007/050481 | 8/10/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/16/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/020249 | 2/21/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6411261 | Lilly | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6670921 | Sievenpiper et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6774867 | Diaz et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6917343 | Sanchez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7042419 | Werner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7145518 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20030122729 | Diaz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040160367 | Mendolia et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0241447 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02069447 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03007427 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090295665 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |