Elevators typically include a car that moves vertically through a hoistway between different levels of a building. At each level or landing, a set of hoistway doors are arranged to close off the hoistway when the elevator car is not at that landing. The hoistway doors open with doors on the car to allow access to or from the elevator car when it is at the landing. It is necessary to have the hoistway doors coupled appropriately with the car doors to open or close them.
Conventional arrangements include a door interlock that typically integrates several functions into a single device. The interlocks lock the hoistway doors, sense that the hoistway doors are locked and couple the hoistway doors to the car doors for opening purposes. While such integration of multiple functions provides lower material costs, there are significant design challenges presented by conventional arrangements. For example, the locking and sensing functions must be precise to satisfy codes. The coupling function, on the other hand, requires a significant amount of tolerance to accommodate variations in the position of the car doors relative to the hoistway doors. While these functions are typically integrated into a single device, their design implications are usually competing with each other.
Conventional door couplers include a vane on the car door and a pair of rollers on a hoistway door. The vane must be received between the rollers so that the hoistway door moves with the car door in two opposing directions (i.e., opening and closing). Common problems associated with such conventional arrangements is that the alignment between the car door vane and the hoistway door rollers must be precisely controlled. This introduces labor and expense during the installation process. Further, any future misalignment results in maintenance requests or call backs.
It is believed that elevator door system components account for approximately 50% of elevator maintenance requests and 30% of callbacks. Almost half of the callbacks due to a door system malfunction are related to one of the interlock functions.
There is a need in the industry for an improved arrangement that provides a reliable coupling between the car doors and hoistway doors, yet avoids the complexities of conventional arrangements and provides a more reliable arrangement that has reduced need for maintenance. One proposal has been to replace mechanical components with electromagnetic components. Examples are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,070,700; 5,174,417 and 1,344,430.
Implementing electromagnetic elevator door coupler devices is not without challenges. For example, residual current within an electromagnet's coil after the electromagnet has been turned off can tend to keep an electromagnet and a coupled component such as a vane coupled together although separation is desired. There is also a competing concern between maintaining a sufficiently adequate coupling force while still allowing some relative vertical movement between magnetically coupled components to accommodate changes in elevator car position during loading or unloading at a landing, for example. It is also necessary to attempt to prevent an accumulation of ferrous debris on an active surface of an electromagnet.
An exemplary electromagnetic coupling device includes an electromagnet and a vane member that is selectively magnetically coupled with the electromagnet. A non-magnetic sliding layer is supported on one of the electromagnet or the vane member. The sliding layer is between the electromagnet and the vane member for maintaining a spacing between the electromagnet and the vane member.
The various features and advantages of the disclosed examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The illustrated example includes a door coupler to facilitate moving the car doors 24 and the hoistway doors 26 in unison when the car 22 is appropriately positioned at a landing. In this example, the door coupler includes an electromagnet 30 associated with at least one of the car doors 24. At least one of the hoistway doors 26 has an associated vane 32 that cooperates with the electromagnet 30 to keep the doors 26 moving in unison with the doors 24 as desired.
In the illustrated example, the electromagnet 30 is supported on a door hanger 34 that cooperates with a track 36 in a known manner for supporting the weight of an associated door and facilitating movement of the door. The vane 32 in this example is supported on a hoistway door hanger 38.
As can be appreciated from
As shown in
Providing at least one sliding layer 40 between the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32 is useful for maintaining at least some spacing between the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32 to facilitate separating them when desired. When the electromagnet 30 is energized to magnetically couple the electromagnet 30 with the vane member 32, a desired magnetic attractive force is generated. After the electromagnet 30 is turned off, residual magnetic flux of the electromagnet can tend to keep the electromagnet 30 coupled to the vane 32. Such a residual attractive force may prevent a desired separation between the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32. This is especially true if there is direct contact between them. Having a non-magnetic sliding layer 40 between them ensures reliable separation when desired.
Maintaining some spacing between the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32 is useful because the attraction force between them is inversely proportional to the size of the gap between them squared. The attraction force tends to be infinity when there is a zero gap between the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32. Even a very small gap provided by a relatively thin sliding layer 40 is sufficient to decrease residual magnetism associated with any residual magnetic flux of the electromagnet 30 after power is turned off to the electromagnet. By making the sliding layer 40 sufficiently thick, the attraction force of any residual magnetism can be effectively reduced to zero.
Some example sliding layers are in range from 0.1 mm to 3 mm. One example includes a sliding layer thickness of at least 0.5 mm. Given this description, those skilled in the art who have information regarding their particular electromagnet design will be able to select appropriate materials and thicknesses for the sliding layer to meet the needs of their particular situation.
In one example, the sliding layer 40 comprises a low friction material. One example includes polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g., TeflonĀ®) as at least one of the components of the sliding layer 40. Using a low friction material accommodates relative vertical movements between the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32 responsive to changes in the position of the car 22 during loading or unloading at a landing, for example. Using a low friction material for the sliding layer 40 reduces wear on the electromagnet and vane 32 under such circumstances. Example materials that are useful as sliding layers that are commercially available include Rynite 530, Delrin 500AF and Delrin 100AF.
The sliding layer in one example provides a relatively low coefficient of friction between the sliding layer and the vane member 32 (in an example where the sliding layer is supported on the electromagnet 30). The coefficient of friction in one example is in a range from 0.15 to 0.3. One example includes selecting materials so that the coefficient of friction is approximately 0.2.
Another advantage of the example sliding layer 40 is that it minimizes an accumulation of ferrous debris on the active surface of the electromagnet 30 (e.g., the surface facing the vane 32). Any ferrous debris attracted by the electromagnet 30 when it is energized that is received against the sliding layer 40 will be spaced from the electromagnet 30 by at least the thickness of the sliding layer 40 so that when the electromagnet 30 is turned off, the ferrous debris will fall away from the electromagnet 30 by its own weight.
Another advantage to the example sliding layer 40 is that it provides a cushioning effect as the electromagnet 30 and the vane member 32 approach each other during an initiation of a magnetic coupling between them. Using a non-magnetic sliding layer 40 and selecting a material that is softer than the ferromagnetic materials of the electromagnet 30 and the vane 32 allows for reducing noise associated with physical contact between the components as they are magnetically coupled together. Reducing noise in this regard is an advantage because passengers or individuals waiting for the arrival of the elevator car will not hear any banging noise that may otherwise occur if there were metal-to-metal contact, for example.
The material selected for the sliding layer in some examples has a thermal expansion coefficient that is close to that of the materials selected for the electromagnet core, the vane member or both. In one example, the sliding layer material has a thermal expansion coefficient that is close to that of mild steel.
The mounting feature 42 may take a variety of forms.
As can be appreciated from
One advantage to the disclosed examples is that no adhesive or other fasteners are required. This ensures an appropriate and desired alignment between the sliding layer 40 and the electromagnet. Additionally, replacement of such a sliding layer becomes easier because there is no need to dissolve a previously applied adhesive and no requirement for special tools to remove any fasteners.
The example sliding layers 40 facilitate the desired amount of electromagnetic coupling between an electromagnet and a vane member, prevent ferrous debris buildup on an electromagnet, accommodate relative movements during elevator car loading or unloading and minimize the amount of noise associated with establishing a magnetic coupling between the electromagnet and the vane member.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/064760 | 3/23/2007 | WO | 00 | 7/9/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/118163 | 10/2/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2427826 | Warsher | Sep 1947 | A |
4956625 | Cardone et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5174417 | Pilsbury | Dec 1992 | A |
5487449 | Barrett et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5917774 | Walkow et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6198369 | Ward et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6292077 | Kaizuka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6559560 | Jin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6874751 | Ojima et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20030148120 | Minnick | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20070152790 | Telep | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0829447 | Mar 1998 | EP |
4512453 | May 1970 | JP |
162280 | Apr 1989 | JP |
03261022 | Nov 1991 | JP |
7309564 | Nov 1995 | JP |
10036046 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2006009536 | Jan 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2007/064760 mailed Dec. 12, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2007/064760 mailed Jun. 12, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100038187 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |