This application is a Patent Cooperation Treaty National Stage of International Application No. PCT/DE2014/000056, filed Feb. 12, 2014, which takes priority from German Patent Application No. DE 20 2013 001 433.4, filed Feb. 14, 2013. The contents of both of Applications PCT/DE2014/000056 and 20 2013 001 433.4 are incorporated herein by reference.
Existing electromagnetic door openers are, for example, known from German Document DE 10 2004 056 567 A1. The remotely operable electric door opener described also comprises locking members, which during a first stage are form-locked with each other. In a second stage however, the resistance to open the door by force is produced by a rather weak formlock between the locking members, i.e. by a leaf spring hook which is in engagement with the door opener strike bolt. The second stage is thus not very effective as a safeguard against twisting.
The present invention relates to an electromagnetic door opener with a housing for fitting into a doorframe, with a hinged flap rotatable between an open position and a closed position, and having a safety device to resist forcibly twisting the flap from the closed position into the open position, the safety device having a primary safety stage and a secondary safety stage.
It is therefore an objective of the invention to develop an electromagnetic door opener in such a way that the resistance against forcibly opening the door is equally strong both in the first stage and in the second stage.
This requirement is met in that the locking members, in a closed position, form a formlock and are supported against the floor of the housing.
With the aid of the electromagnetic door opener the resistance against opening the door by force is achieved by the formlock both in the first stage and in the second stage, and also by supporting the form-locked locking members against the floor of the housing.
An advantage of the invention is that it allows the door opener to be held in the closed position against a force of 10,000 Newtons acting upon the door opener strike bolt.
A further advantage of the present invention is that the locking members of the first stage comprise a first lever and a second lever and the housing floor and in that the formlock is produced by an oblique surface between the two.
The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings, in which:
The electromagnetic door opener 100 is attached to the strike plate 3 such that, when in a closed position, it can receive the door opener strike bolt 5 and hold it in the closed position, and when it is in an open position, releases the door opener strike bolt 5 so that it can move back, pre-tensioned, into the housing 9 of the door lock 1.
The electromagnetic door opener 100 comprises a door opener housing 101, which in the sectional view depicted in
In
In the closed position the plunger core pin 105 is in a retracted position. Several levers, i.e. lever 111, lever 113, lever 115 and lever 117 are arranged between the plunger core pin 105 and a hinged flap 109, in conjunction with a stop 110.
The kinematic chain is shown in detail in
The lever 117, in the view shown in
Pivoting the lever 117 results in the blocking element 131 releasing the lever 113 to allow counterclockwise rotation about the pivot axis 133.
When applying a force to open the door, the lever 111, as the block is released, is rotated downwards in a clockwise direction (see
As a force is applied to open the door, the hinged flap 109, in conjunction with the stop 110, rotates in a counterclockwise direction about the pivot axis 137.
The aforementioned kinematic chain is a means for providing the electromagnetic door opener 100 with a safety device, which provides resistance twisting the door opener strike bolt with force from the closed position into the open position and represents both a primary safety stage and a secondary safety stage. The primary safety stage comprises the lever 111, the lever 113, and the housing floor 107. In the primary safety stage the lever 111 is supported in a formlock against the housing floor 107 via the lever 113. Contact between the lever 111 and the lever 113 is via a first lever gliding surface 139 on the lever 111 and a second lever gliding surface 141 on the lever 113, preferably at an angle of 25° to the housing floor 107. Due to a movement of the lever 113, a gliding contact is obtained at the first lever gliding surface 139 and at the second lever gliding surface 141, which leads to movement of the lever 111. Supporting the lever 111 via the two gliding surfaces 139 and 141 and the lever 113 against the housing floor 107 creates a stable lock of the electromagnetic door opener 100 in the closed position.
Should an external force be applied that is sufficient to overcome the primary safety stage, the depicted arrangement according to the invention provides a secondary safety stage. This secondary safety stage involves the lever 115, which is also supported in a formlock against the housing floor 107. Due to the lever 115 being directly supported against the housing floor 107, following the primary safety stage a second safety stage is created, which provides high resistance. The primary safety stage and the secondary safety stage in the depicted embodiment of the invention show a stability against twisting the hinged flap 109 and releasing the door opener strike bolt, which is in the region of approx. 10,000 N.
The pivot axis 135 of lever 111 extends perpendicularly to the pivot axes 123, 125 and 133 as well as parallel to the pivot axis 137 of the hinged flap 109. The hinged flap 109 is best understood with reference to
The changed alignment of the above mentioned components in relation to each other is triggered by the plunger core pin 105. The resulting rotary movement of the components within a kinematic chain is described above.
The described and shown movements of the above-mentioned components, which trigger one another, are only possible due to the individual components being elastically pre-tensioned. Numerous springs are mounted in the electromagnetic door opener 100 and in the door lock 1. Pre-tensioning is in all cases in the direction of the open position. Actuation of the lever 115 by the plunger core pin 105 therefore permits a sequence of movements, leading to a complete opening of the door lock 1.
The construction of this depicted embodiment according to the invention allows the first safety stage to fail without significant adverse effect on the second safety stage such that twisting of the flap 109 and stop 110 is not possible even in the event of such first stage failure. The lever 115 can only be actuated via the plunger core pin 105 which creates the added measure of safety.
Those skilled in the art will realize that this invention is capable of embodiments different from those shown and described. It will be appreciated that the detail of the structure of the disclosed apparatuses and methodologies can be changed in various ways without departing from the invention itself. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description of the preferred embodiments are to be regarded as including such equivalents as do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2013 001 433 U | Feb 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2014/000056 | 2/12/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/124627 | 8/21/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
420834 | Seib | Feb 1890 | A |
3122388 | Powers | Feb 1964 | A |
3543547 | Sugiyama | Dec 1970 | A |
3640560 | Zawadzki | Feb 1972 | A |
3861727 | Froerup | Jan 1975 | A |
4595220 | Hanchett, Jr. | Jun 1986 | A |
4626010 | Hanchett, Jr. | Dec 1986 | A |
4756566 | Logas | Jul 1988 | A |
4838591 | Fuss | Jun 1989 | A |
4867496 | Thomas | Sep 1989 | A |
4917425 | Logas | Apr 1990 | A |
4986584 | Logas | Jan 1991 | A |
5042857 | Burrows | Aug 1991 | A |
5118150 | Jarrett | Jun 1992 | A |
5195792 | Stendal | Mar 1993 | A |
5219196 | Luker | Jun 1993 | A |
5490699 | Uyeda | Feb 1996 | A |
5681070 | Williams | Oct 1997 | A |
5690373 | Luker | Nov 1997 | A |
5735559 | Frolov | Apr 1998 | A |
5924750 | Fuss | Jul 1999 | A |
5934720 | Karalius | Aug 1999 | A |
5988711 | Toma | Nov 1999 | A |
5990579 | Ricci | Nov 1999 | A |
6082791 | Frolov | Jul 2000 | A |
6595563 | Kiernan | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6874830 | Bashford | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6913299 | Stendal | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6966585 | Egi | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7021684 | Orbeta | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032863 | Piorkowski | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7562918 | Toma | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7722097 | Schnarr | May 2010 | B2 |
8096594 | Uyeda | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8146966 | Webb | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8333411 | Blanch | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8783744 | Scheffler | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8851532 | Geringer | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9255425 | Wittke | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9458647 | Gartner | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9657501 | Armari | May 2017 | B2 |
20020145292 | Furner | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050140151 | Egi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20110031768 | Scheffler | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130088023 | Singh | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130328332 | Scheffler | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140265378 | Lee | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150284976 | Singh | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004056567 | Nov 2004 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150368958 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |