The present invention relates to the transmission signals in wireless communication systems and quantum computers, and more particularly to a manner for improving signal degradation in wireless communications systems and quantum computers using electromagnetic knots.
The transmission of wireless signals in the optical and RF environment and the transmission of quantum signals within a quantum computing environment is susceptible to various environmental interferences and degradations. These environmental interferences and degradations can harm signal quality and cause problems with signal interpretation and discernment. Some manner for limiting signal degradations in these operating environments would provide a great deal of improvement in the signal transmissions and quantum computing environments.
The present invention, as disclosed and described herein, in one aspect thereof comprises a system for transmitting signals includes Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) processing circuitry for receiving a plurality of input signals and applying a different orbital angular momentum to each of the plurality of input signals for transmission to a second location. Electromagnetic knot processing circuitry receives a plurality of OAM processed signals from the OAM processing circuitry and applies an electromagnetic knot to each of the received OAM processed signal before transmission to the second location. Multiplexing circuitry multiplexes the plurality of OAM/electromagnetic knot processed signals into a single multiplexed OAM/electromagnetic knot processed signal. A first signal degradation caused by environmental factors of the OAM/electromagnetic knot processed signal is improved over a second signal degradation caused by the environmental factors of a signal not including the electromagnetic knot. A transmitter transmits the single multiplexed OAM/electromagnetic knot processed signal to the second location.
For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings in which:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are used herein to designate like elements throughout, the various views and embodiments of electromagnetic knot applications in radio waves for wireless transmissions and photonics for quantum computing are illustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the many possible applications and variations based on the following examples of possible embodiments.
An exact solution of Maxwell's equations in empty space with non-trivial topology of the force lines has been obtained by Arrayás and Trueba as described in M. Arrayás and J. L. Trueba, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 524, 71-75 (2012), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, in which there is an exchange of helicity between the electric and magnetic fields. The two helicities are different at time zero, but in the limit of infinite time they are equal, their sum being conserved. Although not widely known, there are topological solutions of Maxwell equations with the surprising property that any pair of electric lines and any pair of magnetic lines are linked except for a zero measure set. These solutions called “electromagnetic knots”, discovered and described in A. F. Rañada, Lett. Math. Phys. 18, 97 (1989); A. F. Rañada, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23, L815 (1990); A. F. Rañada, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25, 1621 (1992), which are each incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and building on the Hopf fibration as describe in H. Hopf, Math. Ann. 104, 637 (1931), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety allows for the basis for a topological model of electro-magnetism (TME) to be proposed, in which the force lines play a prominent role. In A. F. Rañada and J. L. Trueba, Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part III. Electromagnetism, Vol. 119, edited by I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2001) pp. 197-253 and A. F. Rañada, Phys. Lett. A 310, 134 (2003), each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, a review is presented of the work done on the topological model of electro-magnetism. The paper by Arrayás and Trueba is an important step in its development.
The principal aim of this line of research is to complete the topological model of electro-magnetism that, in its present form, is locally equivalent to Maxwell's theory, is based on the topology of the electric and magnetic lines and has topological constants of motion as the electric charge or the total helicity. The force lines are the level curves of two complex scalar fields ϕ(r, t), θ(r, t) with only one value at infinity, that can be interpreted as maps between two spheres S3⋅→S2, the compactification of the physical 3-space and the complete complex plane. As shown by Hopf, such maps can be classified in homotopy classes. W. T. M. Irvine and D. Bouwmeester, Nature Phys. 4, 716 (2008), which is incorporated herein by reference, describes some exciting mathematical representations of these knots, analyzes their physical properties and considers how they can be experimentally constructed.
Faraday dedicated many hours to thinking about the idea of force lines. In his view they had to be important since the experiments showed that a sort of unknown perturbations of space occurred along them. In fact, during the 19th century many physicists tried to understand the electromagnetic phenomena in terms of the vorticity and the streamlines of the ether. Then in 1869, Kelvin wrote a paper entitled “On vortex atoms” (Lord Kelvin, Trans. R. Soc. Edin-burgh 25, 217 (1869), which is incorporated herein by reference) suggesting that the atoms could be links or knots of the vacuum vorticity lines, an idea praised by Maxwell in his explanation of the term “atomism” in the Encyclopaedia Britannica in 1875. Kelvin disliked the extended idea that the atoms are infinitely hard and rigid objects, which he qualified as “the monstrous assumption.” He was much impressed by the constancy of the strength of the vorticity tubes in a non-viscous fluid that Helmholtz had investigated. For him, this was an unalterable quality on which the atomic theory could be based without the need for infinitely rigid objects. We know today that this is also a property of topological models in which invariant numbers characterize configurations that can deform, warp or distort. About sixty years later, topology appeared in Dirac's significant proposal of the monopole (P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 133, 60 (1931), which is incorporated herein by reference) and later in the Aharonov-Bohm effect (Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys., Rev. 115, 485 (1959), which is incorporated herein by reference) which show that, in order to describe electromagnetic phenomena, topology is needed. The same idea motivated the insightful statement attributed to Atiyah “Both topology and quantum physics go from the continuous to the discrete” as described in M. Atiyah, The Geometry and Physics of Knots (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990), which is incorporated herein by reference.
In the topological model of electro-magnetism, the Faraday 2-form and its dual are equal to the pull-backs of the area 2-form in S2, say σ, by the two maps, i.e.
=½Fuvdxμdxv=−ϕ*σ,*=½*Fuvdxμdxv=θ*σ
Where * is the Hodge or duality operator, the two scalars verifying the condition *φ*σ=−θ*σ. It is curious that if this condition is fulfilled, then the forms and * verify automatically Maxwell's equations. In that case, each solution is characterized by the corresponding Hopf index n. The previous relations allow the expressions of the magnetic field B (r, t) and electric field E (r, t) to be written in terms of the scalars as:
where a bar over a variable means a complex conjugate, i is the imaginary unit, c is the speed of light and a is a constant introduced so that the magnetic and electric fields have the correct dimensions. In SI units a is a pure number times ℏμ0, where ℏ is the Planck constant, c the light speed and μ0 the vacuum permeability. The pure number is taken here to be 1, the simplest choice.
Some thought-provoking properties of the topological model of electro-magnetism are the following. It is locally equivalent to the standard Maxwell's theory in the sense that any electromagnetic knot coincides locally with a radiation field, i.e. satisfying E·B=0. However the two models are not globally equivalent because of the way in which the knots behave around the point at infinity. As a consequence of the Darboux theorem as described in C. Godbillon, Géometrie différentielle et mécanique analytique (Hermann, Paris, 1969), which is incorporated herein by reference, any electromagnetic field is locally equal to the sum of two radiation fields.
Maxwell's equations are equal to the exact linearization by change of variables (not by truncation) ϕ, θ→E, B of the set of nonlinear equations of motion of the scalars φ, θ. These equations can be easily found, using the standard Lagrangian density of the electromagnetic field expressed in terms of the pair φ, θ. It happens, however, that this change of variables is not completely invertible, which introduces a “hidden nonlinearity” that explains why the linearity of the standard Maxwell equations is compatible with the existence of topological constants in the topological model of electro-magnetism.
The electromagnetic helicity is defined as:
=½∫R3(A·B+C·E/c2)d3r,
where A and C are vector potentials for B and E, respectively as described in F. W. Hehl and Y. N. Obukhov, Foundations of Classical Electrodynamics: Charge, Flux and Metric (Birkhauser, Boston, 2003), which is incorporated herein by reference. This quantity is conserved and topologically quantized. Solving the integral, it is found that =na, where n is the common value of the Hopf indices of ϕ and θ. It turns out, moreover, that =(NR−NL) where NR, NL are the classical expressions of the number of right- and left-handed photons contained in the field (i.e. =∫d3k[āR(K)α(k)(k)−āL(k)αL(k)], αR(k)αL(k), being Fourier transforms of Aμ in classical theory but creation and annihilation operators in the quantum version). This establishes the curious relation n=NR−NL between two concepts of helicity, i.e. the rotation of pairs of lines around one another (n, classical) and the difference between the number of right- and left-handed photons (NR−NL, quantum), respectively. In the standard knots of the topological model of electro-magnetism, the two terms of the helicity integral are equal. What Arrayás and Trueba have done suggests that these standard knots are attractors of other knots that have unequal electric and magnetic helicities, which is a curious and interesting result as illustrated in M. Arrayás and J. L. Trueba, arXiv:1106.1122v1 [hep-th] (2011), which is incorporated herein by reference. Another intriguing property of the topological model of electro-magnetism is that the electric charge is also topologically quantized (as well as the hypothetical magnetic charge), the fundamental charge that it predicts being q0=/ℏcc0=5.29×10−19 C≈3.3 e, while its fundamental monopole would be g0=q0/c=gD/20.75, gD being the value of the Dirac monopole as described in A. F. Rañada and J. L. Trueba, Phys. Lett. B 422, 196 (1998), which is incorporated herein by reference. This means that the topological model of electro-magnetism is symmetric under the interchange of electricity and magnetism. Note, however, that e<q0<gD c, which raises an exciting, if perhaps speculative, eventuality. Because the vacuum is dielectric but also paramagnetic, its effect must be to decrease the value of the charge and to increase that of the monopole. This suggests the possibility that the topological model of electro-magnetism could describe what happens at high energies, at the unification scale, where the particles interact directly through their fundamental bare charge q0 without renormalization. This suggestion is reinforced by the fact that the fine structure constant of the model is:
α0=d02/4πℏcε0=¼π≈0.8, a value 0 close to a strong
Application to Wireless Communications and Quantum Computing
Referring now to
This system and method introduces a new way of combating the degradations due to fading and geometrical dispersion in wireless communications as well as quantum de-coherence in quantum computing using electromagnetic knots. As illustrated in
In general, natural processes can degrade fabrics and signals, but generally they are not able to undue a knotted fabric or a knotted electromagnetic wave. Today, we know that Maxwell equations have an underlying topological structure given by a scalar field which represents a map S3×R→S2 that determines the electromagnetic field through a certain transformation from 3-sphere to 2-sphere. Therefore, Maxwell equations in vacuum have topological solutions, characterized by a Hopf index equal to the linking number of any pair of magnetic lines. This allows the classification of the electromagnetic fields into homotopy classes, labeled by the value of the helicity. This helicity verifies ∫A·B dr=na where “n” is an integer and an action constant. This helicity is proportional to the integer action constant.
Topology plays a very important role in field theory. Since 1931, when Dirac proposed his idea of the monopole, topological models have a growing place in physics. There have been many applications such as the sine-Gordon equation, the Hooft-Polyakov monopole, the Skyrme and Faddeev models, the Aharonov-Bohm effect, Berry's phase, or Chern-Simons terms.
As more fully described hereinbelow, a model is introduced of an electromagnetic field in which the magnetic helicity ∫A·B dr is a topological constant of the motion, which allows the classification of the possible fields into homotopy classes, as it is equal to the linking number of any pair of magnetic lines.
Electromagnetic Field Model with Hopf Index
Let ϕ(r, t) and θ(r, t) be two complex scalar fields representing maps R3×R→C. By identifying R3∩{∞} with S3 and C∩{∞} with S2, via stereographic projection, ϕ and 0 can be understood as maps S3×R→S2. We then define the antisymmetric tensors Fuv, Guv to be equal to:
where a is an action constant, introduced so that Fuv, and Guv, will have proper dimensions for electromagnetic fields, and prescribe that G be the dual of F or, equivalently,
Guv=½∈uvxβFxβFuv=−½∈uvxβGxβ
where ∈0123=+1. To fulfill this requirement, ϕ is a scalar and θ a pseudo scalar. This allows defining of the magnetic and electric fields B and E as:
FOt==E1,Fy=−∈ykBk; GOi=B1,Gy=−∈ijkEk;
After that, the Lagrangian density is determined:
L=−⅛(FuvFuv+GuvGuv),
The duality condition or constraint is then imposed:
Mσβ=Gxβ−½∈xβuvFuv=0
Following the method of Lagrange multipliers, the modified Lagrangian density are determined according to:
L′=L+μαβMαβ,
where the multipliers are the component of the constant tensor μ×β. A simple calculation shows that the constraint above does not contribute to the Euler-Lagrange equations, which happen to be:
∂αFαβ∂βϕ=0 ∂αFαβ∂βϕ*=0
∂αGαβ∂βθ=0 ∂αGαβ∂βθ*=0
This means that, if the Cauchy data (ϕ, ∂0ϕ, θ, ∂0θ) at t=0 verify the constraint, it will be maintained for all t>0. Surprisingly, it follows that both Fαβ and dαβ verify Maxwell equations in vacuum. In fact, definitions above imply that:
∈αβγ5∂βFγδ
∈αβy5∂βGyδ=0,β=0,1,2,3
which is the second Maxwell pair for the two tensors. In other words, if ϕ and θ obey the Euler-Lagrange equations), then Fα/β and Gαβ defined by verify the Maxwell ones and are, therefore, electromagnetic fields of the standard theory. The reason is that Maxwell equations in vacuum have the property that, if two dual tensors verify the first pair, they also verify the second one (i.e. the two pairs are dual to each other).
A standard electromagnetic field is any solution of Maxwell equations. An admissible electromagnetic field is one which can be deduced from a scalar ϕ. Let fuv(ϕ) be the electromagnetic tensor Fuv. The electric and magnetic vectors of ϕ, E(ϕ) and B(ϕ) respectively, are:
E1(ϕ)=f01(ϕ),B1(ϕ)=½∈ijkfjk(ϕ)
With this notation, the duality constraint is written as:
E(ϕ)=−B(θ),B(ϕ)=E(θ)
It is necessary to characterize the Cauchy data {ϕ(r, 0), ∂iϕ(r, 0), θ(r, 0), ∂iθ(r, 0)}. As was shown before, if the condition is verified at t=0, and is also satisfied for all t>0. In this case, the Cauchy data and the corresponding solution of Maxwell equations are admissible.
From the two facts
i) E(ϕ) and B(ϕ) are mutually orthogonal
ii) B(ϕ) is tangent to the curves ϕ=canst and B(ϕ) is tangent to θ=canst,
It follows that these two sets of curves must be orthogonal. Let ϕ(r, 0) be any complex function with the only condition that the 1-forms dϕ and dϕ* in R3 are linearly independent. The previous condition on ϕ can be written as:
(∇ϕ*×∇ϕ)·(∇θ*×∇θ)=0
Given ϕ, is a complex PDE for the complex function θ; it has solutions (this will be used in an explicit example herein below). This gives ϕ(r, 0) and θ(r, 0), and the time derivatives ∂tϕ(r, 0) and ∂tθ(r, 0) are fixed by the condition above. For instance, B(θ) is a linear combination of ∇ϕ* and ∇ϕ:
B(θ)=h∇ϕ*+b*∇ϕ
The function ϕ(r, 0) can be determined from ϕ(r, 0) and θ(r, 0) and,
The value of ∂0ϕ can be computed. To obtain ∂oθ, one can proceed in an analogous way. Therefore, there is no difficulty with the Cauchy problem, the system having two degrees of freedom with a differential constraint.
Up to now, a pair of fields (ϕ, θ) have been used, but it is easy to understand that θ is no more than a convenience which can be disregarded. In fact, one can forget about θ and use only the scalar ϕ, taking:
L=−¼FuvFuv,Fuv=fuv(ϕ)
As Lagrangian density and accepting only Cauchy data [ϕ(r, 0), ∂0 (r, 0)] for which there exists an auxiliary function θ. From this point of view, the electromagnetic field would be a scalar. From now on, the θ field will be considered only as an auxiliary function. The basic field equations of the model thus take the form:
and are transformed into Maxwell equations.
In summary:
These solutions of Maxwell equations are not included in this theory. Also, the use of the spheres S3 and S2 may remind us of Chern-Simons terms. But, as S3 represents the physical space R3 via stereographic projection and S2 identified with the complex plane, is the space where the field takes values, this model does not really make use of these kinds of terms.
As will be shown in the next section, it is not possible to distinguish between this model and the Maxwell one if the fields are weak. However, every ϕ solution defines at any time t a map S3→S2 which has a topological charge. In this fashion, the electric E and magnetic B fields can be represented as follows:
It is possible to create paraxial solutions using electromagnetic knots that produce knotted Orthogonal Orbital Angular (OAM) states. These states can be muxed to achieve improvements in wireless, security, Quantum Key Distribution and quantum computing.
How to Generate Electromagnetic Knots
Referring now to
Referring now to
Electromagnetic Radio Wave Knots
Referring now to
I=(Ĩe−iω
The (identical) current in each ring 902 is directed in the {tilde over (ϕ)} direction for I>0. Ignoring interactions between rings 902, taking each ring to be of negligible cross-section, neglecting the radiation produced by the elements that connect the rings to the current source and assuming the surrounding medium to be transparent with phase refractive index np, the electric field radiated by the rings is essentially:
ELF=({tilde over (E)}LFe−ω
with each element treated as an oscillating electric dipole.
Which is essentially the electric field Ea of the electric ring 802. The two coincide precisely in form for np≈1 so that f′=f, together with a choice of phase for I such that {tilde over (E)}′0→E0 is real. The geometrical requirements above are reasonably well satisfied by M=100, R=1.0×10−1 m and
for example. The design can be changes to generate other unusual electromagnetic disturbances in the radio waves.
Referring now to
Referring not to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The patch antennas 1610 used within the multilayer patch antenna array 1602 are made from FR408 (flame retardant 408) laminate that is manufactured by Isola Global, of Chandler Ariz. and has a relative permittivity of approximately 3.75. The antenna has an overall height of 125 μm. The metal of the antenna is copper having a thickness of approximately 12 μm. The patch antenna is designed to have an operating frequency of 73 GHz and a free space wavelength of 4.1 mm. The dimensions of the input 50 Ohm line of the antenna is 280 μm while the input dimensions of the 100 Ohm line are 66 μm.
Each of the patch antennas 1610 are configured to transmit signals at a predetermined phase that is different from the phase of each of the other patch antenna 1610 on a same layer. Thus, as further illustrated in
Each of the antenna layers 1604, 1606 and 1608 are connected to a coaxial end-launch connector 1616 to feed each layer of the multilayer patch antenna array 1602. Each of the connectors 1616 are connected to receive a separate signal that allows the transmission of a separate ordered antenna beam in a manner similar to that illustrated in
It should be understood that other types of Hermite Gaussian and Laguerre Gaussian beams can be transmitted using the multilayer patch antenna array 1602 illustrated. Hermite-Gaussian polynomials and Laguerre-Gaussian polynomials are examples of classical orthogonal polynomial sequences, which are the Eigenstates of a quantum harmonic oscillator. However, it should be understood that other signals may also be used, for example orthogonal polynomials or functions such as Jacobi polynomials, Gegenbauer polynomials, Legendre polynomials and Chebyshev polynomials. Legendre functions, Bessel functions, prolate spheroidal functions and Ince-Gaussian functions may also be used. Q-functions are another class of functions that can be employed as a basis for orthogonal functions.
The feeding network 1618 illustrated on each of the layers 1604, 1606, 1608 uses delay lines of differing lengths in order to establish the phase of each patch antenna element 1610. By configuring the phases as illustrated in
Referring now to
Using the transmitter 2002 illustrated in
Referring now to
The signals transmitted by the transmitter 2002 or the receiver 2202 may be used for the transmission of information between two locations in a variety of matters. These include there use in both front haul communications and back haul communications within a telecommunications or data network.
As described previously, the knotted signals 1510 (
In addition to the RF wireless versions described above other types of system may be used for generating electromagnetic knots in other operating environments. Qubit signals in quantum computing system can be generated using electromagnetic knots in photonics using polarization states of the signals in system such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/509,301, entitled UNIVERSAL QUANTUM COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION, QKD SECURITY AND QUANTUM NETWORKS USING OAM QU-DITS WITH DLP, filed on Jul. 11, 2019, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Knotted OAM states can be generated using both photonics and electromagnetic waves such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/882,085, entitled APPLICATION OF ORBITAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM TO FIBER, FSO AND RF, filed on Oct. 13, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Referring now to
As described above path loss can degrade an electromagnetic signal. Other than path loss degradation of electromagnetic signals (due to geometrical dispersion), channel effects can also degrade the information signal (channel conditions). As discussed herein, environmental degradations can never open the electromagnetic knots. The electromagnetic knots may be used in a number of applications including all communications in wireless and fiber, radar, wearable using lasers and biomedical devices.
In topological quantum computers, the Schrodinger wave function or state is knotted via a sophisticated braiding process that preserves the topological features (wave knots) in the presence of noise (critical for quantum computing). Therefore, one has to encode information into the electromagnetic knots before transmission. Various applications of wave function knots include quantum computing, quantum communications and networks, quantum informatics, cyber security and condensed matter or solid states.
The mathematical foundation of the above is a new algebra (Clifford Algebra) which generalizes quaternions and its relationship with electromagnetic knots as well as braid group representations related to Majorana fermions. This algebra is a non-Abelian algebra where such knots can be generated. These braiding representations have important applications in quantum informatics and topology. There is one algebra describing both electromagnetic knots as well as Majorana operators. They are intimately connected to SU(2) symmetry groups in group theory. A new formulation of electromagnetism in SU(2) symmetry can describe over half a dozen observed electromagnetic phenomenon where traditional theory in U(1) symmetry cannot. That is the braiding of Majorana fermions as well as electromagnetic knots happen by natural representations of Clifford algebras and also with the representations of the quaternions as SU(2) to the braid group and electromagnetic knots.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that this electromagnetic knots and its applications in radio waves for wireless transmissions and photonics for quantum computing provides an improved manner for limiting signal degradation to signals in wireless systems and quantum computing. It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to the particular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included are any further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/579,298, filed Sep. 23, 2019, entitled ELECTROMAGNETIC KNOT APPLICATIONS IN RADIO WAVES FOR WIRELESS AND PHOTONICS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/744,516, filed Oct. 11, 2018, entitled ELECTROMAGNETIC KNOTS AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN RADIO WAVES FOR WIRELESS AND PHOTONICS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8432884 | Ashrafi | Apr 2013 | B1 |
9077577 | Ashrafi et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
10516486 | Ashrafi | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20020191565 | Mani et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20100080309 | Moffatt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110150464 | Murshid | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120319903 | Huseth et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130235744 | Chen | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235885 | Chen | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130308956 | Meyers | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150071190 | Lau et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150188660 | Byun | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150333865 | Yu | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160028479 | Ren et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160043794 | Ashrafi et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044647 | Ashrafi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160111781 | Matteoni | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170117626 | Sajuyigbe | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170223735 | Damnjanovic et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013143061 | Apr 2015 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Aiaronov, Y., & Boimi, D. (1959). Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. vol. 115, No. 3, 485-491. |
Arrayas, M., & Trueba, J. L. (2011). Torus-Knotted Electromagnetic Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.1122. |
Arrayas, M., Trueba, J. L.; Exchange of helicity in a knotted electromagnetic field; Annalen der Physik, Wiley Online Library, vol. 524, No. 2; 71-75, (2012). |
Dirac, P. A. M. (1931). Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papersofa Mathematical and Physical Character, 133(821), 60-72. |
Electromagnetic Knots and the Magnetic Flux in superconductors, Jose Trueba, 2008, pp. 183-192. |
Electromagnetic Knots, Ranada et al., Jul. 1995, pp. 337-342. |
Knots and electromagnetism, De Klerk, Jun. 2016, pp. 1-44. |
Knots and the Maxwell's Equations, Vancea, Jan. 2019, pp. 1-25. |
Ranada, A. F., & Trueba, J. L. (1998). A topological mechanism of discretization for the electric charge. Physics Letters B, 422(1-4), 1-10. |
Ranada, A. F.; A Topological Theory of the Electromagnetic Field; Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 18, No. 2; 97-106, (1989). |
Thomson, W. (1868). VI._—On Vortex Motion. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 25(1), 217-260. |
Torus-Knotted Electromagnetic Fields, Arraya et al., Mar. 2012, pp. 1-15. |
Two properties of electromagnetic knots, Ranada et al. Jul. 1997, pp. 25-33. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200395658 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62744516 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16579298 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17005923 | US |