The present invention relates to electromagnetic locks; more particularly, to an apparatus for monitoring the lock status of electromagnetic locks; and most particularly, to an improved electromagnetic lock monitoring system employing an analog Hall Effect sensor to determine a continuously variable separation between a door and a frame.
Electromagnetic locks for securing doors or gates are well known in the prior art. In a typical installation, a magnetically-susceptible keeper plate is mounted on a door, and an electromagnet is mounted on a door frame. When the electromagnet is energized and is in contact with the keeper plate with the door closed, the plate becomes an armature for the electromagnet, thus providing a mechanism for locking the door to the frame. When the magnetic loop is complete, by contact of the armature with the electromagnetic, the magnetic flux density is at a maximum.
In some access control systems used, for example in doors used in conjunction with fire control and emergency exits, it is desirable to provide delayed egress through an emergency door. Delayed egress is when an access control system must provide guaranteed egress within a fixed period of time while also providing notification to security personnel during that same period of time that egress is required. During the delayed egress time period, while a small gap exists between the door and frame, the door is kept in the locked state with power continuing to be supplied to the electromagnet. At the end of the delay period, power is removed from the electromagnet thus allowing free egress. Within the time period before de-energizing, a shorter “nuisance delay” period exists to deal not only with accidental striking of the door, but also with thwarted attempts of vandalism as might be expected from young persons who would push the door, hear the alarm, and then run away. If action to open the door ceases during the nuisance delay period, the alarm also ceases and the system remains armed for the next opening attempt. On the other hand, if the attempt to open the door is sustained for longer than the nuisance delay period, say after 15 or 30 seconds, the signal to open the door becomes irrevocable, the electromagnet is de-energized at the end of the irrevocable time, and the door is permitted to fully open. Such systems are in broad use, particularly in retail establishments where they greatly reduce theft loss while complying with building codes that require a minimum number of emergency exits.
In know systems, a gap can occur between the frame and the door because the keeper plate (armature) is not rigidly fastened to the door but rather floats on an armature mounting device which is fixed to the door. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,738 B1, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Consequently, pressure on the emergency door can create a gap between the door and the door frame of, typically, up to about one inch (2.54 cm.). In some security applications, it is essential that the door not be allowed to clear the frame during the nuisance delay period, to prevent passing of, for example, documents; thus, in some applications a gap as small as about 0.125 inches (0.32 cm.) must be detected.
It is known in the cited prior art to employ a digital device based upon the Hall Effect, wherein the voltage potential orthogonal to a magnetic field is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field. Thus, attempted opening of an emergency door increases a starting gap between the sensor and a cooperating permanent magnet mounted on the door, reducing the strength of the sensor magnetic field, which reduction can be sensed by the Hall Effect sensor and an alarm provided by a cooperating micro-controller.
A known problem in use of prior art systems, such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,738, is that the digital Hall sensor signals can alarm only when the sensor/magnet gap reaches a predetermined value. Thus, the door/frame gap for each installation requires individual physical adjustment to obtain proper correlation between a desired door/frame gap setting and the preset sensor/magnet gap. For this reason, employing a single system design to accommodate a range of desired door/frame gap settings is unwieldy.
What is needed in the art is an improved Hall Effect gap detection and alarm system that may be easily set to provide an alarm at any desired gap size for any installation.
It is a principal object of the present invention to simplify the setting of an alarm or nuisance gap at any desired gap size for an electromagnetic lock installation, thus making an alarm system applicable to a wide range of door/gap requirements.
Briefly described, in access control systems used in conjunction with fire control, it is desirable to be able to provide delayed egress. To make delayed egress available, a fire exit door is provided with a rim exit device and suitable circuitry to ensure that the door is alarmed either locally or remotely for several seconds following pressure on the rim exit device and prior to actual release of the door. For systems employing an electromagnetic lock, a separation between the door and the door frame can occur because the armature keeper plate is not rigidly fastened to the door but rather floats on a spring-loaded mounting unit which is fixed to the door. Consequently, pressure on the rim exit device can create a gap between the door and the door frame of up to about 1 inch (2.54 cm.). This gap is then used to sense that egress is desired while the electromagnetic lock is still energized and the door is still secure. In some applications, it is a requirement to detect a door/frame gap as small as 0.125 inch (0.32 cm.).
In the prior art employing a digital Hall Effect proximity sensor, accurate and difficult adjustments of the electromagnetic lock and the spacing of the keeper plate from the door need to be made on an initial setup of a door and then may have to be frequently re-adjusted to maintain the required settings.
The present invention employs an analog Hall Effect proximity sensor in place of the prior art digital Hall Effect sensor. The analog sensor produces a continuous signal indicative of the spacing of the sensor from the permanent magnet and hence the gap between the door and the door frame. Calibration curves are provided to the micro-controller relating sensor signal strength to gap size. The analog Hall Effect sensor converts the magnetic field density to current that is provided to the analog-to-digital converter input of the micro-controller which stores the result. Subsequent movement of the door with respect to the frame results in a varying current input from the sensor to the micro-controller. The micro-processor then compares the new result with the old result and calculates a new value for door/frame gap, resulting in continuous, accurate measurement of the gap. Once an alarm limit for the gap is reached, a warning signal is emitted visually and/or audibly, and locally and/or remotely, to indicate that egress has been requested. Additional circuitry provides a variable duration for such annunciation, followed by eventual power removal from the electromagnetic lock, at which point the door may be opened and egress accomplished.
An important benefit of an electromagnetic lock in accordance with the present invention is that, with a continuously variable analog signal over the entire range of desired gaps, a single lock model may be used on any and all applications requiring any gap alarm annunciation within that range.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate currently preferred embodiments of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring to
Permanent magnet 40 is also mounted to door 10 such that when door 10 is in its fully closed position, permanent magnet 40 is brought into sufficient proximity to sensor assembly 24 (
As shown in
There are several advantages to this greater travel distance. The first is that the activation distance 50′ can be set far enough such that clearances within the space of the usual slack in the latch will not cause a false initiation of the system.
A second advantage is that it provides greater tactile and visual feedback to the person attempting to make an emergency exit. This provides greater assurance to a possibly panic-stricken individual that the door is functioning properly and will release shortly.
A third advantage is that with a greater travel distance, the sensors that sense when someone is attempting to exit need not be as precise in their ability to measure that the door has been moved a specified amount. This allows sensors to be more economical, more tamper-resistant, and/or easier to install and maintain.
The present system includes a sensor assembly 24 comprising an analog Hall Effect proximity sensor to sense when the door has been moved in an attempt to exit the building. A suitable analog sensor is, for example, Model ACS712, available from Allegro Microsystems, Inc., Worcester, Mass., USA.
Referring now to
If the alarm condition (the “delay initiating signal”) persists for more than the programmed nuisance delay, typically, only a few seconds, the system micro-controller begins a predetermined egress delay countdown, at the end of which (typically, about 15 seconds) the micro-controller issues a door unlock signal that causes electromagnet 18 to be de-energized. It will be noted that the magnetic field created by electromagnet 18 is sufficiently confined and directed such that the field does not affect the operation of the sensor within sensor assembly 24.
While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4241337 | Prada | Dec 1980 | A |
4287512 | Combs | Sep 1981 | A |
4359646 | Mejia et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4487439 | McFadden | Dec 1984 | A |
4516114 | Cook | May 1985 | A |
4652028 | Logan et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4686792 | Terrian | Aug 1987 | A |
4703962 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720128 | Logan et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4763937 | Sittnick et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4806910 | Salzer | Feb 1989 | A |
4893852 | Harris et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4915431 | Bailey | Apr 1990 | A |
5063372 | Gillett | Nov 1991 | A |
5184855 | Waltz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5429399 | Geringer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5455562 | Chin | Oct 1995 | A |
5496079 | Frolov | Mar 1996 | A |
5534849 | McDonald et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5758913 | Roth et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6053546 | Frolov | Apr 2000 | A |
6271751 | Hunt et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6583616 | Bomya | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586926 | Bomya | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609738 | Roth et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6992478 | Etherington et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7049914 | Lamb et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7142113 | Lian et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7205872 | Baechle et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7242297 | Vogt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7417543 | Bergman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7999644 | Nakayama et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20040212503 | Stilp | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070139195 | Jin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090140858 | Gore et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100045053 | Dye et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Build Your Own Gaussmeter,” Jan. 10, 2006; http://www.coolmagnetman.com/magmeter.htm. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12396018 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 15254659 | US |