Disclosed embodiments relate generally to downhole electromagnetic logging and more particularly to a logging tool for making fully gain compensated tri-axial propagation measurements, such as phase shift and attenuation measurements, using orthogonal antennas.
The use of electromagnetic measurements in prior art downhole applications, such as logging while drilling (LWD) and wireline logging applications is well known. Such techniques may be utilized to determine a subterranean formation resistivity, which, along with formation porosity measurements, is often used to indicate the presence of hydrocarbons in the formation. Moreover, azimuthally sensitive directional resistivity measurements are commonly employed e.g., in pay-zone steering applications, to provide information upon which steering decisions may be made.
Downhole electromagnetic measurements are commonly inverted at the surface using a formation model to obtain various formation parameters, for example, including vertical resistivity, horizontal resistivity, distance to a remote bed, resistivity of the remote bed, dip angle, and the like. One challenge in utilizing directional electromagnetic resistivity measurements, is obtaining a sufficient quantity of data to perform a reliable inversion. The actual formation structure is frequently significantly more complex than the formation models used in the inversion. The use of a three-dimensional matrix of propagation measurements may enable a full three-dimensional measurement of the formation properties to be obtained as well as improve formation imaging and electromagnetic look ahead measurements. However, there are no known methods for providing a fully gain compensated tri-axial propagation measurement.
A deep reading electromagnetic logging while drilling tool includes first and second logging while drilling subs. The first sub includes a first transmitter and a first receiver axially spaced apart from one another and the second sub includes a second transmitter and a second receiver axially spaced apart from one another. Each of the first and second transmitters and first and second receivers includes an axial antenna and collocated first and second transverse antennas. The first and second transverse antennas in the first receiver are rotationally offset by a predefined angle from the first and second transverse antennas in the first transmitter. The logging while drilling tool may optionally include a processor configured to acquire voltage measurements from the first and second receivers and process ratios of selected voltage measurements to obtain fully gain compensated measurement quantities.
The disclosed embodiments may provide various technical advantages. For example, the disclosed embodiments may provide an electromagnetic logging while drilling tool that ensures that a non-zero signal is received at each of the x- and y-axis receivers when the x- and y-axis transmitters with the predefined rotational offset are fired. The disclosed logging tool may further advantageously be utilized to obtain a fully gain compensated three-dimensional matrix of measurements. Moreover, the use of orthogonal antennas in the disclosed embodiment significantly reduces the effects of antenna tilt angle variation, tool bending, and alignment angle errors on the compensated measurement quantities.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed subject matter, and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It will be understood that the deployment illustrated on
It will be further understood that the disclosed embodiments are not limited to use with a semisubmersible platform 12 as illustrated on
It will be understood that the offset angle α is not necessarily 45 degrees as depicted on
As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, a time varying electric current (an alternating current) in a transmitting antenna produces a corresponding time varying magnetic field in the local environment (e.g., the tool collar and the formation). The magnetic field in turn induces electrical currents (eddy currents) in the conductive formation. These eddy currents further produce secondary magnetic fields which may produce a voltage response in a receiving antenna. The measured voltage in the receiving antennas can be processed, as is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, to obtain one or more properties of the formation.
In general the earth is anisotropic such that its electrical properties may be expressed as a three-dimensional tensor which contains information on formation resistivity anisotropy, dip, bed boundaries and other aspects of formation geometry. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the mutual couplings between the tri-axial transmitter antennas and the tri-axial receiver antennas depicted on
where Vij represent the three-dimensional matrix of measured voltages, with i indicating the corresponding transmitter triad (e.g., T1 or T2) and j indicating the corresponding receiver triad (e.g., R1 or R2), Ii represent the transmitter currents, and Zij represent the transfer impedances which depend on the electrical and magnetic properties of the environment surrounding the antenna pair in addition to the frequency, geometry, and spacing of the antennas. The third and fourth subscripts indicate the axial orientation of the transmitter and receiver antennas. For example, V12xy represents a voltage measurement on the y-axis antenna of receiver R2 from a firing of the x-axis antenna of transmitter T1.
When bending of the measurement tool is negligible (e.g., less than about 10 degrees), the measured voltages may be modeled mathematically, for example, as follows:
Vij=GTimTitRθtZijRθmRjGRj (2)
where Z11 are matrices representing the triaxial tensor couplings (impedances) between the locations of transmitter i and receiver j, GTi and GRj are diagonal matrices representing the transmitter and receiver gains, Rθ represents the rotation matrix about the z-axis through angle θ, mTi and mRj represent the matrices of the direction cosines for the transmitter and receiver moments at θ=0, and the superscript t represents the transpose of the corresponding matrix. The matrices in Equation 2 may be given, for example, as follows:
Using the T1x antenna direction as a reference direction, the matrices of the direction cosines of the transmitter and receiver moments may be given, for example, as follows:
mTi=I
mR1=Rα
mR2=RγRα
mT2=Rγ (7)
where I represents the identity matrix, Rα represents the rotation matrix about the z-axis through the angle α, and Rγ represents the rotation matrix about the z-axis through the angle γ.
Substituting Equation 7 into Equation 2 yields the following mathematical expressions:
V11=GT1(RθtZ11Rθ)RαGR1
V12=GT1(RθtZ12Rθ)RγRαGR2
V21=GT2Rγt(RγtZ21Rθ)RαGR1
V22=GT2Rγt(RθtZ22Rθ)RγRαGR2 (8)
The rotated tensor couplings (shown in the parentheses in Equation 8) may be expressed mathematically in harmonic form, for example, as follows:
RθtZijRθ=ZDC_ij+ZFHC_ij cos(θ)+ZFHS_ij sin(θ)+ZSHC_ij cos(2θ)+ZSHS_ij sin(2θ) (9)
where ZDC_ij represents a DC (average) coupling coefficient, ZFHC_ij and ZFHS_ij represent first order harmonic cosine and first order harmonic sine coefficients (referred to herein as first harmonic cosine and first harmonic sine coefficients), and ZSHC_ij and ZSHS_ij represent second order harmonic cosine and second order harmonic sine coefficients (referred to herein as second harmonic cosine and second harmonic sine coefficients) of the couplings. These coefficients are shown below:
As stated above, the receiver antenna voltages are measured at 120 while the tool rotates at 100 (
Vij=VDC_ij+VFHC_ij cos(θ)+VFHS_ij sin(θ)+VSHC_ij cos(2θ)+VSHS_ij sin(2θ) (11)
Following Equation 2, the DC, first harmonic, and second harmonic voltage coefficients may be modeled, for example, as follows:
VDC_ij=GTimTitZDC_ijmRjGRj
VFHC_ij=GTimTitZFHC_ijmRjGRj
VFHS_ij=GTimTitZFHS_ijmRjGRj
VSHC_ij=GTimTitZSHC_ijmRjGRj
VSHS_ij=GTimTitZSHS_ijmRjGRj (12)
In one disclosed embodiment gain compensation may be accomplished by obtaining ratios between the x and y and receiver gains and the x and y transmitter gains (e.g., at 124 in
From Equations 10 and 12, the measured DC voltages VDC_11 may be expressed as a function of the couplings (impedances), gains, and the angle α, for example, as follows:
Taking the ratio between the DC xx and yy voltage measurements yields:
Likewise, taking the ratio between the DC voltage xy and yx measurements yields:
where gR1x and gR1y represent the gains of the x and y antenna on receiver R1 and gT1x and gT1y represent the gains of the x and y antenna on transmitter T1. Equations 15 and 16 may be combined to obtain measured quantities that are equivalent to a gain ratio of the x and y receiver and a gain ratio of the x and y transmitter, for example, as follows:
Since the gain ratio formulas in Equation 17 involve taking a square root, there may be a 180 degree phase ambiguity (i.e., a sign ambiguity). As such, the gain ratios may not be arbitrary, but should be controlled such that they are less than 180 degrees. For un-tuned receiving antennas, the electronic and antenna gain/phase mismatch (assuming the antenna wires are not flipped from one receiver to another) may generally be controlled to within about 30 degrees (particularly at the lower frequencies used for deep measurements). This is well within 180 degrees (even at elevated temperatures where the mismatch may be at its greatest). For tuned transmitting antennas, however, the phase may change signs (i.e., jump by 180 degrees) if the drift in the antenna tuning moves across the tuning resonance. Such transmitter phase ratio ambiguity (sign ambiguity) may be resolved, for example, using Equations 15 and 16 and the knowledge that the receiver gain/phase ratio is not arbitrary, but limited to about 30 degrees (i.e. to enable the determination of whether the transmitter phase difference is closer to 0 or 180 degrees).
The x and y gain ratios defined in Equation 17 enable the following gain ratio matrices to be defined (e.g., at 124 in
where GR1_ratio represents the gain ratio matrix for receiver R1 and GT1_ratio represents the gain ratio matrix for transmitter T1. Similar gain ratio matrices may be obtained for receiver R2 and transmitter T2.
Applying these gain ratios to the measured voltages (shown in Equation 14) enables the y transmitter and y receiver gains to be replaced by x transmitter and x receiver gains (e.g., at 126 in
where VDC_11_rot represent the rotated DC voltage coefficients. It will be understood that rotation about the z-axis does not change the value of the DC coefficient (see Equation 9) and that Equation 19 may be expressed identically as: VDC_11_rot GT1_ratioVDC_11GR1_ratio. Notwithstanding, in the description that follows, the DC coefficients are shown to be rotated to be consistent with the first harmonic and second harmonic coefficients.
The first harmonic cosine coefficients may be similarly rotated to obtain rotated first harmonic cosine coefficients, for example, as follows:
where VFHC_11_rot represent the rotated first harmonic cosine voltage coefficients. The first harmonic cosine coefficients may be similarly rotated by αm plus an additional 90 degree back rotation to obtain rotated first harmonic sine coefficients, for example, as follows:
where VFHS_11_rot represent the rotated first harmonic sine voltage coefficients. The second harmonic cosine coefficients may be rotated similarly to the first harmonic cosine coefficients to obtain rotated second harmonic cosine coefficients, for example, as follows:
where VSHC_11_rot represent the rotated second harmonic cosine voltage coefficients. The second harmonic cosine coefficients may be similarly rotated by αm plus an additional 45 degree back rotation to obtain rotated second harmonic sine coefficients, for example, as follows:
where VSHS_11_rot represent the rotated second harmonic sine voltage coefficients. The voltage measurements for other transmitter receiver combinations may also be similarly rotated. For example, the voltage measurements on receiver R2 obtained upon firing transmitter T1 may be back rotated by both αm and the measured alignment mismatch between the first and second subs γm (as though receiver R2 were back rotated with respect to transmitter T1 by αm and γm). The misalignment angle between the subs may be measured using substantially any technique. For example, the misalignment angle may be taken to be the difference between magnetic toolface angles measured at each of the subs, and is referred to as γm to indicate that it is a measured value. The T1-R2 voltage measurements may be given, for example, as follows:
VDC_12_rotGT1_ratioVDC_12GR2_ratioRαmtRγmt
VFHC_12_rotGT1_ratioVFHC_12GR2_ratioRαmtRγmt
VFHS_12_rotR90GT1_ratioVFHS_12GR2_ratioRαmtR90Rγmt
VSHC_12_rotGT1_ratioVSHC_12GR2_ratioRαmtRγmt
VSHS_12_rotR45GT1_ratioVSHS_12GR2_ratioRαmtR45Rγmt (24)
The voltage measurements on receiver R1 obtained upon firing transmitter T2 may also be rotated (in this case as though receiver R1 were back rotated with respect to transmitter T1 by αm and transmitter T2 were back rotated with respect to transmitter T1 by γm).
VDC_21_rotRγmGT2_ratioVDC_21GR1_ratioRαmt
VFHC_21_rotRγmGT2_ratioVFHC_21GR1_ratioRαmt
VFHS_21_rotRγmR90GT2_ratioVFHS_21GR1_ratioRαmtR90
VSHC_21_rotRγmGT2_ratioVSHC_21GR1_ratioRαmt
VSHS_21_rotRγmR45GT2_ratioVSHS_21GR1_ratioRαmtR45t (25)
The voltage measurements on receiver R2 obtained upon firing transmitter T2 may also be rotated (in this case as though receiver R2 were back rotated with respect to transmitter T1 by αm and γm and transmitter T2 were back rotated with respect to transmitter T1 by γm).
VDC_22_rotRγmGT2_ratioVDC_22GR2_ratioRαmtRγmt
VFHC_22_rotRγmGT2_ratioVFHC_22GR2_ratioRαmtRγmt
VFHS_22_rotRγmR90GT2_ratioVFHS_22GR2_ratioRαmtR90tRγm
VSHC_22_rotRγmGT2_ratioVSHC_22GR2_ratioRαmtRγmt
VSHS_22_rotRγmR45GT2_ratioVSHS_22GR2_ratioRαmtR45tRγmt (26)
The rotated voltage measurements presented in Equations 19-26 may be combined in various combinations to obtain a large number of compensated measurements (e.g., at 130 in
Compensated quantities RCXY and RCYX equivalent to the xy and yx cross coupling impedances (also referred to herein as the xy and yx couplings) may be obtained, for example, as follows:
Compensated quantities RCXZ and RCYZ which are related to the xz and zx cross coupling impedances and the yz and zy cross coupling impedances (also referred to herein as the xz, zx, yz, and zy couplings) may be obtained, for example, as follows:
For each transmitter receiver combination the above described rotated voltage coefficients (Equations 19-26) may also be combined to improve signal to noise ratio (e.g., at 142 in
The measurement equivalent to the zz coupling does not required rotation and may be expressed, for example, as follows:
ZZijVDC
The combined measurements in Equations 33 through 41 may be further combined to fully compensate the transmitter and receiver gains (e.g., at 144 in
where CXXplusYY represents a compensated measurement equivalent to the xx+yy coupling and XXplusYYij is defined in Equation 33. A phase shift and attenuation for this quantity may be computed, for example, as follows:
where XXplusYY_CPS and XXplusYY_CAD represent the compensated phase shift and attenuation of the xx+yy coupling.
Compensated measurements equivalent to the xx and/or yy couplings may be constructed by combining the xx+yy measurements with the xx-yy measurements, for example, as follows:
where CXX and CYY represent compensated measurements equivalent to the xx and yy couplings and XXplusYYij and XXminusYYij are defined in Equations 33 and 35. Phase shift and attenuation for these quantities may be computed as described above with respect to Equation 43.
Compensated measurements sensitive to a sum of the xy and yx couplings may be computed in a similar manner using the second harmonic cosine and the DC coefficients, for example, as follows:
where CXYplusYX represents the compensated measurement and XYplusYXij is defined in Equation 36. A compensated measurement sensitive to a difference between the xy and yx couplings may similarly be computed.
where CXYminusYX represents the compensated measurement and XXplusYYij and XYminusYXij and are defined in Equations 33 and 34. A compensated measurement sensitive to a difference between the xx and yy couplings may further be computed:
where CXXminusYY represents the compensated quantity and XXplusYY11 and XXminusYY12 are defined in Equations 33 and 35.
Since the quantities in Equations 46, 47, and 48 may be equal to zero in simple formations, the phase shift and attenuation may be computed by adding one to the compensated quantity, for example, as follows:
where CPS quantities represent a compensated phase shift and CAD quantities represent a compensated attenuation.
Other compensated combinations of the couplings may be computed from the ratios of the second harmonic to DC coefficients. These couplings are similar to those described above, but yield compensated measurements at different depths of investigation (i.e., using a single transmitter and a single receiver). For example,
where CXXminusYYij, CXYplusYXij, and CXYminusYXij represent the compensated measurements at any transmitter i receiver j combination and XXplusYYij, XYminusYXij, XXminusYYij, and XYplusYXij are defined in Equations 33 through 36. Additionally, compensated combinations may be computed from the second harmonic coefficients that are sensitive to either the xy or yx couplings For example,
where CXYij and CYXij represent the compensated measurements at any transmitter i receiver j combination and XXplusYYij, XYminusYXij, and XYplusYXij are defined in Equations 33, 34, and 36. Phase shift and attenuation for the quantities shown in Equations 52 through 56 may be computed as described above with respect to Equations 49-51.
Equations 42 through 56 disclose compensated measurements sensitive to one or more of the xx and yy couplings and the xy and yx couplings. The zz coupling may be compensated, for example, as follows:
where CZZ represents the compensated measurement and ZZij are defined in Equation 41.
Gain compensated quantities sensitive to the xz, zx, yz, and zy couplings may be computed, for example, as follows:
where CXZZXij represents a compensated quantity sensitive to the product of xz and zx impedances, CYZZYij represents a compensated quantity sensitive to the product of yz and zy impedances, and XXplusYYij, XZij, YZij, ZXij, and ZZij are defined in Equations 33 and 37 through 41. It will be understood that CXZZXij and CYZZYij may be used to provide compensated measurements at different depths of investigation (e.g., at shallow depths for T1-R1 and T2-R2 combinations and larger depths for T1-R2 and T2-R1 combinations).
Equations 33 and 37 through 41 may also be used to provide compensated quantities that have properties similar to the symmetrized and anti-symmetrized quantities disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,969,994 and 7,536,261 which are fully incorporated by reference herein. For example, the following compensated ratios may be computed.
In Equation 60, Rzx and Rxz represent compensated quantities that are proportional to the square of the zx and xz couplings. Hence, compensated measurements proportional to the zx and xz couplings may be obtained, for example, as follows: CZX=√{square root over (Rzx)} and CXZ=√{square root over (Rxz)}. Gain compensated measurements sensitive to the zy and yz couplings may be obtained similarly (i.e., by computing Rzy and Ryz).
The compensated symmetrized and anti-symmetrized measurements may then be defined, for example, as follows:
where scaleCZZ·CXX and Rzx, Rxz, R1xz_zx, and R2xz_zx are defined in Equation 60. As described above with respect to Equation 17, taking the square root of a quantity can introduce a sign (or phase) ambiguity. Even with careful unwrapping of the phase in Equation 61, a symmetrized directional measurement Sc may have the same sign whether an approaching bed is above or below the measurement tool. The correct sign may be selected, for example, via selecting the sign of the phase angle and/or attenuation of the following relation:
TSD=√{square root over (Rzx)}−√{square root over (Rxz)} (62)
Similarly the anti-symmetrized directional measurement Ac in Equation 61 has the same sign whether the dip azimuth of the anisotropy is less than 180 degrees or greater than 180 degrees. This sign ambiguity may be resolved, for example, by taking the sign of the phase angle and/or attenuation of the following relation.
TAD=√{square root over (Rzx)}+√{square root over (Rxz)} (63)
The symmetrized and anti-symmetrized measurements may now be re-defined, for example, as follows to eliminate the sign ambiguity.
Symmetrized directional phase shift and attenuation measurements TDSP and TDSA may be defined, for example, as follows:
Likewise, anti-symmetrized directional phase shift and attenuation TDAP and TDAA measurements may also be defined, for example, as follows:
The symmetrized and anti-symmetrized phase shift and attenuation given in Equations 65 and 66 may alternatively and/or additionally be modified to scale the phase shifts and attenuations. For example, for a deep reading array having a large spreading loss the phase shifts in particular tend to be small. These values can be scaled by the spreading loss to scale them to values similar to those computed for a conventional shallow array, for example, as follows:
where SL represents the spreading loss which is proportional to the cube of the ratio of the distance from the transmitter to the near receiver to the distance from the transmitter to the far receiver.
The quantities TSD and TAD computed in Equations 62 and 63 may alternatively be used to compute symmetrized and anti-symmetrized phase shift and attenuation, for example, as follows:
Moreover, the quantities computed in Equations 58, 59, and 60 may also be used to compute phase shift and attenuation values using the methodology in Equations 69 and 70.
The disclosed embodiments are now described in further detail with respect to the following non-limiting examples in
In the examples that follow (in
It will be understood that the various methods disclosed herein for obtaining fully gain compensated electromagnetic measurement quantities may be implemented on a on a downhole processor. By downhole processor it is meant an electronic processor (e.g., a microprocessor or digital controller) deployed in the drill string (e.g., in the electromagnetic logging tool or elsewhere in the BHA). In such embodiments, the fully compensated measurement quantities may be stored in downhole memory and/or transmitted to the surface while drilling via known telemetry techniques (e.g., mud pulse telemetry or wired drill pipe). Alternatively, the harmonic fitting coefficients may transmitted uphole and the compensated quantities may be computed at the surface using a surface processor. Whether transmitted to the surface or computed at the surface, the quantity may be utilized in an inversion process (along with a formation model) to obtain various formation parameters as described above.
Although deep reading electromagnetic logging while drilling tools have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/972,291 entitled Compensated Deep Propagation Tensor Measurement with Orthogonal Antennas, filed Mar. 29, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5235285 | Clark | Aug 1993 | A |
5585790 | Luling et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594343 | Clark et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5757191 | Gianzero | May 1998 | A |
6147496 | Strack | Nov 2000 | A |
6294917 | Nichols | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6768105 | Mullins et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788065 | Homan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6819111 | Fanini et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6911824 | Bittar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6969994 | Minerbo et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7095012 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7305306 | Venkataramanan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7382135 | Li et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389159 | Warren et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7536261 | Omeragic et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7548887 | Ogino et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7825664 | Homan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848887 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7915895 | Chemali et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916092 | Homan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7966273 | Hegeman et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7990153 | Streinz et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7991555 | Yang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8274289 | Bittar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8368403 | Homan et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8407005 | Zhdanov et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8466683 | Legendre et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20030057950 | Gao et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030085707 | Minerbo et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030184304 | Homan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040183538 | Hanstein et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196047 | Fanini | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207403 | Fanini et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060043973 | Chen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060253255 | Omeragic et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070024286 | Wang | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080078550 | Chatterji et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080079580 | Shelton et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080143336 | Legendre et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090015261 | Yang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090309600 | Seydoux | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100277176 | Homan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110074427 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110238312 | Seydoux et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110291855 | Homan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309833 | Yang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120105076 | Li et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120166086 | Zhong et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120242342 | Rabinovich et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120286790 | Yang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035862 | Fang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130073206 | Hou et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130141104 | Homan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191028 | Homan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130301388 | Hartmann et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304384 | Rabinovich et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140096955 | Indo et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140292341 | Yang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150276967 | Frey | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276968 | Frey | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276971 | Frey | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276972 | Frey | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160195634 | Frey et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0721111 | Jul 1996 | EP |
2320251 | May 2011 | EP |
10-0264630 | Sep 2000 | KR |
2009009342 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2013095997 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013095997 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2014003701 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014003702 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015027002 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015027010 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO2015027002 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO2015153303 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zhong, “DDRB Measurement Construction”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://omniworks.slb.com/support/OmniWorks/ARL/Fetch/File?objName=em—ans\DDR—EMLA\FwdModeling\Core\DDRB—measurement—construction.docx, pp. 1-27; May 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related PCT application PCT/US2015/022770 on Jun. 30, 2015. 4 pages. |
Efron, “Bootstrap methods: Another look at the Jackknife”, The Annals of Statistics, vol. 7, No. 1, 1979, pp. 1-26. |
Frey, et al., “A Retrievable and Reseatable Propagation Resistivity Tool for Logging While Drilling and Logging While Tripping”, SPE ATCE, San Antonio, Texas, SPE 103066, Sep. 24-27, 2006. |
Hegeman, et al., “Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Downhole Fluid Analysis”, Paper IPTC 11268 PP, presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dubai, U.A.E., published SPEREE as SPE 123423, Feb. 2009. |
Stine, “Bootstrap Prediction Intervals for Regression”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 80, No. 392, Dec. 1985, pp. 1026-1031. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2015/022736, on Jun. 26, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2015/022737, on Jun. 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2015/022744, on Jun. 26, 2015, 10 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2015/022866, on Jun. 29, 2015, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150276968 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61972291 | Mar 2014 | US |