This application is a continuation-in-part of application no. 2012/0118129, filed on Nov. 16, 2010, now abandoned.
An electromagnetic pickup (pickup, hereinafter) converts the vibrations of plucked strings of an electric guitar, which are located on top of the pickup where electromagnetic fields are formed, into an electrical signal. In general a single coil pickup (SC pickup, hereinafter) comprises of a set of pole pieces made of magnetic or ferromagnetic materials, magnetic wire coil, bobbin plates, and lead wires. The SC pickup is sensitive to external magnetic fields created by speakers, power transducers, fluorescent light sources and so on, resulting in undesired humming noise.
Such humming noise can be reduced or eliminated by combining two magnetic sensing coils electrically out-of-phase so that two signals generated by the external sources can be cancelled each other. The electromagnetic signal from guitar strings can be preserved either by setting the two coils magnetically out-of-phase or by isolating one of the two coils magnetically from the strings.
Overall, there are two structural configurations—1) side-by-side configuration, wherein two coils are situated side-by-side and are both electrically and magnetically out-of-phase (U.S. Pat. No. 2,896,491, U.S. Pat. No. 4,364,295, U.S. Pat. No. 4,372,186, U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,185, U.S. Pat. No. 5,111,728, U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,750, U.S. Pat. No. 5,530,199, U.S. Pat. No. 8,309,836, US Pat. Appl. No. US 2012/0103170, and so on), and 2) stacked configuration, wherein two coils are stacked on top of each other and are both electrically and magnetically out-of-phase like the former (U.S. Pat. No. 6,846,981), or electrically out-of-phase and magnetically in-phase with magnetic isolating means for one coil (U.S. Pat. No. 4,442,749, U.S. Pat. No. 5,168,117, U.S. Pat. No. 5,668,520, U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,710, U.S. Pat. No. 6,103,966, U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,758, U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,759, U.S. Pat. No. 6,846,981, U.S. Pat. No. 7,166,793, U.S. Pat. No. 7,189,916, and so on).
The most popular hum-cancelling pickup with the side-by-side configuration was introduced by Lover (U.S. Pat. No. 2,896,491). The pickups built according to this invention have been called PAF (Patent Applied For), which was printed on the bottom plate of those pickups in the early days. In this document the hum-cancelling pickup with the side-by-side configuration is referred to simply as the HB (Hum-Bucking) pickup, hereinafter. It is to be noted that the hum-cancelling pickup with the stacked configuration will be referred to as the stacked hum-cancelling pickup.
A pickup has a unique response characteristic to string vibrations resulting in a unique tone color. Pickup tone is dependent on many parameters, which include magnet materials, pole pieces, bobbin materials and structures, magnet wire gage, magnet wire coating materials, the number of wire turns and so on. Although external factors such as guitar builds, effects pedals and amplifiers can color the tone characters to some extent, they cannot completely override the original tone of the pickup. That is why old classical pickups including the said PAF are still popular, and also, a number of different pickup products are available in the music industry.
Two most distinctive tone colors are generated from aforementioned SC and HB pickups. The SC pickup usually produces a clear and bright sound with a focus on the treble to mid-range domain, whereas the HB pickup produces a warm and thick sound with a focus on the mid-range domain. The majority of electric guitar players use both types of pickups depending on the needs. Because it is inconvenient and impractical to change guitars for different pickup sounds in the middle of performance, many guitar builders and pickup makers offer the option of “coil-splitting”, by which a guitar player can use only one of the two coils in the HB pickup, or more rarely “combining”, in which two individual SC pickups are electrically connected like one HB pickup. However, both methods do not deliver a purposed SC or HB sound very well. A coil-split pickup sound is typically thinner and less lively than a genuine SC pickup sound. On the other hand, a combination of two genuine SC pickups does not usually produce a good HB pickup sound defined by warmth and fullness. As a result, pickups that can produce both HB and SC sounds are hardly found.
From a set of experiments it was found that one of the most critical factors, which make the difference in sound characteristics between a genuine SC pickup and a coil-split HB pickup, was the space between the coil and the pole pieces and that such space in the HB pickup can be made closer to that of the SC pickup without damaging or changing the sound characteristics and form factor of the HB pickup. The details of this invention and embodiments are described in the next sections.
This invention is about a method to wind the HB pickup to obtain a clear and bright SC-like pickup sound from one of its pole piece/bobbin/coil assemblies. At least one of the two pickup bobbins is made such that the surface of pole pieces is in contact with the innermost wires of a coil, or the distance between the two is closer than that of the traditional HB pickup. This can be made possible by eliminating or thinning the wall of pole piece holes in a molded plastic bobbin. An inner coil is wound around a bobbin such that the space occupied by the pole piece hole wall is now filled with the inner coil. An outer coil is then wound on top of the inner coil according to a designated HB winding specification. The outer coil or the serially connected inner and outer coils are electrically connected to a coil wound around the other bobbin to obtain a HB pickup sound, whereas the inner and outer coils wound around the same bobbin are electrically connected in-phase to produce a SC pickup sound. In effect this invention makes the HB pickup and the electric guitar employing one or plural of them versatile in terms of tonal variations.
Note that the schematics used in this document are not to scale. This document assumes all the electrical connections shown in the figures follow the well-established art of HB pickup wiring (e.g., in-phase and out-of-phase wiring), and thus, phase information is not specified in the drawings. This document also assumes that all embodiments of this invention follow the known art of magnet, pole piece dispositions, and other miscellaneous items including spacers and screw holders within the HB pickup (based on Lover's patent, 1959), which have been well established, published and commercialized.
In order to illustrate the embodiment of the present invention more effectively a simplified diagram is used for coils.
One way to eliminate the wall space 11c is to use separate top and bottom bobbin plates, 11a and 11b, combined with ferromagnetic pole pieces 13. It can be also realized with the molded plastic bobbin by eliminating the outward part of the pole piece hole wall 11c.
It is important to note that this invention is applicable to any HB pickups wherein two pole piece/bobbin/coil assemblies are situated side by side. For example, this invention can be embodied into the “blade” pickup invented by Stich (U.S. Pat. No. 4,364,295 granted in 1982). In case of the blade pickup, the pole piece 13 illustrated in
In other embodiments, the wall thickness may be reduced instead of being completely removed to obtain a specific type of SC pickup tone while maintaining the specification of the outer coil 21a. In traditional HB pickups, the pole piece hole wall thickness for cylinder-type pole pieces 13 is about 0.8 mm. Therefore, the pole piece hole wall thickness, or in more general term, the minimum distance between the outer surface of pole pieces 13 and the innermost wires of the inner coil 21b must be smaller than 0.8 mm.
As illustrated in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2896491 | Lover | Jul 1959 | A |
3711619 | Jones | Jan 1973 | A |
4364295 | Stich | Dec 1982 | A |
4372186 | Aaroe | Feb 1983 | A |
5111728 | Blucher | May 1992 | A |
5378850 | Tumura | Jan 1995 | A |
5408043 | Lace | Apr 1995 | A |
5525750 | Beller | Jun 1996 | A |
5530199 | Blucher | Jun 1996 | A |
5811710 | Blucher | Sep 1998 | A |
5932827 | Osborne | Aug 1999 | A |
6103966 | Kinman | Aug 2000 | A |
6291758 | Turner | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291759 | Turner | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6525258 | Powers | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7189916 | Kinman | Mar 2007 | B2 |
8309836 | Bolger | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8319088 | Harari | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8802959 | Mills | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8969701 | Dixon | Mar 2015 | B1 |
20020069749 | Hoover | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040003709 | Kinman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060156911 | Stich | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070017355 | Lace | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20120103170 | Kinman | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118129 | Jang | May 2012 | A1 |
20130327202 | Mills | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140245877 | Gelvin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150379978 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |