This invention relates, in general, to the field of overrunning coupling and control assemblies and, more particularly, to systems controlling the operating mode of overrunning coupling assemblies.
A typical one-way clutch (i.e., OWC) includes a first coupling member, a second coupling member, and a first set of locking members between opposing surfaces of the two coupling members. The one-way clutch is designed to lock in one direction and to allow free rotation in the opposite direction. Two types of one-way clutches often used in vehicular, automatic transmissions include:
One-way clutches typically over run during engine braking rather than enable engine braking. It is for this reason there is a friction pack at the same transmission node. Selectable dynamic clutches can be used to prevent the over running condition and enable engine braking.
Controllable or selectable one-way clutches (i.e., OWCs) are a departure from traditional one-way clutch designs. Selectable OWCs often add a second set of struts or locking members in combination with a slide plate. The additional set of locking members plus the slide plate adds multiple functions to the OWC. Depending on the needs of the design, controllable OWCs are capable of producing a mechanical connection between rotating or stationary shafts in one or both directions. Also, depending on the design, OWCs are capable of overrunning in one or both directions. A controllable OWC contains an externally controlled selection or actuation mechanism. Movement of this selection mechanism can be between two or more positions which correspond to different operating modes. The selection mechanism is a separate system or assembly that is fixed relative to the OWC by same fastening technique. Such selection mechanism is fixed in a separate and subsequent operation after the OWC has been formed. That subsequent operation requires an additional work station, be it automated or otherwise, which increases, in particular, the manufacturing time and cost of the finished assembly.
In addition, the fact that separate, external parts may be mounted on or near the OWC in a source of quality defects and thus adds to the cost of making such controllable or selectable OWC's which may be significant on a mass production basis. Also, due to dimensional stack-up issues control element or selector plate binding can result especially over long term use.
Driven by a growing demand by industry, governmental regulatory agencies and consumers for durable and inexpensive products that are functionally comparable or superior to prior art products, a continuing need exists for improvements in clutches subjected to difficult service conditions such as extreme temperatures. This is particularly true in the automotive industry where developers and manufacturers of clutches for automotive applications must meet a number of competing performance specifications for such articles.
Another problem associated with prior art coupling and control assemblies is that it is undesirable to have a relatively large distance between the control element and the activator which moves the control element. A large distance reduces the amount of available space in which the assembly is located. For example, in a vehicle, the amount of space for such assemblies is typically quite limited.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,455 discloses a bi-directional overrunning pawl-type clutch. U.S. Pat. No. 6,244,965 discloses a planar overrunning coupling for transfer of torque. U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,044 discloses a selectable one-way clutch assembly for use in an automatic transmission. U.S. Pat. No. 7,258,214 discloses an overrunning coupling assembly. U.S. Pat. No. 7,344,010 discloses an overrunning coupling assembly. U.S. Pat. No. 7,484,605 discloses an overrunning radial coupling assembly or clutch.
Other related U.S. patent publications include 2012/0145506; 2011/0192697; 2011/0183806; 2010/0252384; 2009/0194381; 2008/0223681; 2008/0169166; 2008/0185253; and the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,079,453; 7,992,695, 8,051,959, 7,743,678; and 7,491,151.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,272,488 discloses in its FIGS. 9a-9c (labeled as
Other U.S. patent publications which disclose controllable or selectable one-way clutches include U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,193,038; 7,198,587; 7,275,628; and 7,464,801, and U.S. Publication Application Nos. 2007/0278061; 2008/0110715; 2009/0159391; and 2009/0211863.
Other U.S. patent documents related to the present application include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,947,537; 2,959,062; 4,050,560; 4,651,847; 6,905,009; 8,061,496; 8,286,772; 2004/0238306; 2006/0185957; 2007/0034470; 2012/0152683; and 2012/0152687.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,942,781 discloses a high-efficiency vehicular transmission. The transmission includes a transmission housing, a set of torque delivery elements which include first and second elements supported for rotation within the housing and an electric motor for changing angular velocity of at least one of the elements in response to an electrical signal during a shift to obtain a desired transmission ratio. At least one non-friction controllable coupling assembly has a coupling state for coupling the first element to either the second element or the housing and an uncoupling state for uncoupling the first element from either the second element or the housing, respectively. The at least one coupling assembly is non-hydraulically controlled to change state to maintain the desired transmission ratio.
Other related U.S. patent publications include: 2011/0140451; 2011/0215575; 2011/0233026; 2011/0177900; 2010/0044141; 2010/0071497; 2010/0119389; 2009/0133981; 2009/0127059; 2009/0084653; 2009/0142207; 2009/0255773; 2009/0098968; 2010/0200358; 2009/0211863; 2009/0159391; 2009/0098970; 2008/0110715; 2008/0169165; 2007/0278061; 2007/0056825; 2006/0252589; 2006/0278487; 2006/0138777; 2006/0185957; 2004/0110594; and the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,942,781; 7,806,795; 7,695,387; 7,690,455; 7,484,605; 7,464,801; 7,349,010; 7,275,628; 7,256,510; 7,223,198; 7,198,587; 7,093,512; 6,953,409; 6,846,257; 6,814,201; 6,503,167; 6,328,670; 6,692,405, 6,193,038; 4,050,560; 4,340,133; 5,597,057; 5,918,715; 5,638,929; 5,342,258; 5,362,293; 5,678,668; 5,070,978; 5,050,534; 5,387,854; 5,231,265; 5,394,321; 5,206,573; 5,453,598; 5,642,009; 6,075,302; 6,065,576; 6,982,502; 7,153,228; 5,846,257; 5,924,510; and 5,918,715.
A linear motor is an electric motor that has had its stator and rotor “unrolled” so that instead of producing a torque (rotation) it produces a linear force along its length. The most common mode of operation is as a Lorentz-type actuator, in which the applied force is linearly proportional to the current and the magnetic field. U.S. published application 2003/0102196 discloses a bi-directional linear motor.
Linear stepper motors are used for positioning applications requiring rapid acceleration and high speed moves with low mass payloads. Mechanical simplicity and precise open loop operation are additional features of the stepper linear motor systems.
A linear stepping motor operates on the same electromagnetic principles as a rotary stepping motor. The stationary part or platen is a passive toothed steel bar extending over the desired length of travel. Permanent magnets, electromagnets with teeth, and bearings are incorporated into the moving elements or forcer. The forcer moves bidirectionally along the platen, assuring discrete locations in response to the state of the currents in the field windings. In general, the motor is two-phase, however a larger number of phases can be employed.
The linear stepper motor is well known in the prior art and operates upon established principles of magnetic theory. The stator or platen component of the linear stepper motor consists of an elongated, rectangular steel bar having a plurality of parallel teeth that extends over the distance to be traversed and functions in the manner of a track for the so-called forcer component of the motor.
The platen is entirely passive during operation of the motor and all magnets and electromagnets are incorporated into the forcer or armature component. The forcer moves bidirectionally along the platen assuming discrete locations in response to the state of the electrical current in its field windings.
Mechanical forces that are due to local or distant magnetic sources, i.e. electric current and/or permanent magnet (PM) materials, can be determined by examination of the magnetic fields produced or “excited” by the magnetic sources. A magnetic field is a vector field indicating at any point in space the magnitude and direction of the influential capability of the local or remote magnetic sources. The strength or magnitude of the magnetic field at a point within any region of interest is dependent on the strength, the amount and the relative location of the exciting magnetic sources and the magnetic properties of the various mediums between the locations of the exciting sources and the given region of interest. By magnetic properties one means material characteristics that determine “how easy” it is to, or “how low” a level of excitation is required to, “magnetize” a unit volume of the material, that is, to establish a certain level of magnetic field strength. In general, regions which contain iron material are much easier to “magnetize” in comparison to regions which contain air or plastic material.
Magnetic fields can be represented or described as three dimensional lines of force, which are closed curves that traverse throughout regions of space and within material structures. When magnetic “action” (production of measurable levels of mechanical force) takes place within a magnetic structure these lines of force are seen to couple or link the magnetic sources within the structure. Lines of magnetic force are coupled/linked to a current source if they encircle all or a portion of the current path in the structure. Force lines are coupled/linked to a PM source if they traverse the PM material, generally in the direction or the anti-direction of the permanent magnetization. Individual lines of force or field lines, which do not cross one another, exhibit levels of tensile stress at every point along the line extent, much like the tensile force in a stretched “rubber band,” stretched into the shape of the closed field line curve. This is the primary method of fore production across air gaps in a magnetic machine structure.
One can generally determine the direction of net force production in portions of a magnetic machine by examining plots of magnetic field lines within the structure. The more field lines (i.e. the more stretched rubber bands) in any one direction across an air gap separating machine elements, the more “pulling” force between machine elements in that given direction.
For purposes of this application, the term “coupling” should be interpreted to include clutches or brakes wherein one of the plates is drivably connected to a torque delivery element of a transmission and the other plate is drivably connected to another torque delivery element or is anchored and held stationary with respect to a transmission housing. The terms “coupling”, “clutch” and “brake” may be used interchangeably.
An object of at least one embodiment of the present invention is to provide an improved electromagnetic system for controlling the operating mode of an overrunning coupling assembly and an improved overrunning coupling and control assembly including the system.
In carrying out the above object and other objects of at least one embodiment of the present invention, an electromagnetic system for controlling the operating mode of an overrunning coupling assembly is provided. The assembly includes first and second coupling members having first and second coupling faces, respectively, in close-spaced opposition with one another. At least one of the members is mounted for rotation about an axis. The system includes a control member mounted for controlled shifting movement between the coupling faces. A stator structure includes at least one electromagnetic source to create a magnetic force when energized. A magnetic or ferromagnetic translator structure is coupled to the control member for selective, small displacement, control member movement. The translator structure is magnetically coupled to the stator structure across an air gap and is supported for translational movement relative to the stator structure along a path between first and second stable end positions which correspond to first and second operating modes of the coupling assembly, respectively. The translator structure completes a path of magnetic flux to magnetically latch in at least one of the end positions and to translate along the path between the end positions upon experiencing a net translational force comprising a first translational force caused by energization of the at least electromagnetic source and a latching force based upon position of the translator structure along the path.
The system may further include at least one biasing member to exert a biasing force on the translator structure. The net translational force further includes the biasing force caused by the at least one biasing member.
The system may further include a permanent magnet source either coupled to the translator structure to move therewith or coupled to the stator structure.
One of the end positions may be an overrun position, one of the modes may be an overrun mode, the other of the end positions may be a locked position, and the other of the modes may be a locked mode.
One of the coupling members may include a notch plate and the other of the coupling members may include a pocket plate coupled to the stator structure.
The system may further include a locking member disposed between the coupling faces of the coupling members and movable between first and second positions. The control member causes the locking member to change position in an intermediate position of the translator structure wherein the coupling members are torque-locked going from the first end position to the second end position.
The locking member may be a reverse strut.
The control member may be a control or selector plate rotatable about the axis.
The control member may have at least one opening which extends completely therethrough to allow the locking member to extend therethrough to the first position of the locking member in a control position of the control member.
The path may be a curved path.
Each biasing member may include a spring.
Further in carrying out the above object and other objects of at least one embodiment of the present invention, an overrunning coupling and electromagnetic control assembly is provided. The assembly includes a coupling subassembly including first and second coupling members having first and second coupling faces, respectively, in close-spaced opposition with one another. At least one of the members is mounted for rotation about an axis. The assembly also includes a control member mounted for controlled shifting movement between the coupling faces and a stator structure having at least one electromagnetic source to create a magnetic force when energized. A magnetic or ferromagnetic translator structure is coupled to the control member for selective, small displacement control member movement. The translator structure is magnetically coupled to the stator structure across an air gap and is supported for translational movement relative to the stator structure along a path between first and second stable end positions which correspond to first and second operating modes of the coupling subassembly, respectively. The translator structure completes a path of the magnetic flux to magnetically latch in at least one of the end positions and translates along the path between the end positions upon experiencing a net translational force comprising a first translational force caused by energization of the at least electromagnetic source and a latching force based upon position of the translator structure along the path.
The assembly may further include at least one biasing member to exert a biasing force on the translator structure. The net translational force further includes the biasing force caused by the at least one biasing member.
One of the end positions may be an overrun position, one of the modes may be an overrun mode, the other of the end positions may be a locked position, and the other of the modes may be a locked mode.
One of the coupling members may include a notch plate and the other of the coupling members may include a pocket plate coupled to the stator structure.
A permanent magnet source may be coupled to the translator structure to translate therewith or coupled to the stator structure.
The assembly may further include a locking member disposed between the coupling faces of the coupling members and movable between first and second positions. The control member causes the locking member to change position in an intermediate position of the translator structure wherein the coupling members are torque-locked going from the first end position to the second end position.
The locking member may be a reverse strut.
The control member may be a control or selector plate rotatable about the axis.
The control member may have at least one opening which extends completely therethrough to allow the locking member to extend therethrough to the first position of the locking member in a control position of the control member.
The path may be a curved path.
Each biasing member may include a spring.
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
Referring again to the drawing figures,
The assembly 10 also includes a control element or selector slide plate, generally indicated at 26, having a plurality of spaced apertures 28 extending completely therethrough to allow the reverse struts 22 to pivot in their pockets 20 and extend through the apertures 28 to engage spaced locking formations or ramped reverse notches (not shown) formed in a radially extending surface or coupling face of a forward or inner pocket plate or coupling member, generally indicated at 34, when the plate 26 is properly angularly positioned about a common central rotational axis 36 by an actuator arm, generally indicated at 37. The arm 37 includes a shift fork part 38 coupled to the plate 26 and a pin portion 39 coupled to and retained within a pin retainer 41 within a slot 35 formed in the retainer 41 (
As shown in
The plate 34 comprises a splined ring having internal splines 46 formed at its inner axially extending surface 48. A radially extending surface 50 or coupling face spaced from the other coupling face (not shown) of the plate 34 has a plurality of spaced pockets 52 formed therein to receive a plurality of forward struts 54 therein which are pivotally biased by corresponding coil springs (not shown). Preferably, fourteen forward struts 54 are provided. However, it is to be understood that a greater or lesser number of forward struts 54 may be provided.
The assembly 10 may also include a second outer coupling member or notch plate, generally indicated at 58, which has a plurality of locking formations, cams or notches (not shown) formed in a radially extending surface or coupling face (not shown) thereof by which the forward struts 54 lock the forward plate 34 to the notch plate 58 in one direction about the axis 36 but allow free-wheeling in the opposite direction about the axis 36. The notch plate 58 includes external splines 64 which are formed on an outer axial surface 66 of the plate 58 and which are received and retained within axially extending recesses 68 formed within the inner axially extending surface 47 of the outer circumferential end wall of the plate 12.
The assembly 10 may further include a snap ring, generally indicated at 72, having end portions 74 and which fits within an annular groove 76 formed within the inner surface 47 of the end wall of the plate 12 to hold the plates 12, 26, 34 and 58 together and limit axial movement of the plates relative to one another.
Referring to
In the embodiment of
The stator structure 80 also preferably includes a pair of spaced steel pieces 94 which not only function as stops, but also to help complete the path of the magnetic flux. The steel pieces 94 include apertures 96 to seat at least one biasing member such as one or more springs (not shown) to exert one or more biasing forces on the translator structure 84. The net translational force further comprises the biasing force(s) caused by the at least one biasing member.
Referring now to
The system of
The subassembly also includes a translator structure, generally indicated at 84′, which is coupled to the actuator arm 37 for selective, small displacement actuator arm movement. The translator structure 84′ is magnetically coupled to the stator structure 80′ as it travels along a path between first and second stable end positions which correspond to first and second operating modes of the clutch assembly, respectively. The first and second modes may be locked or unlocked (i.e. free wheeling) modes. The translator structure 84′ completes a path of the magnetic flux to magnetically latch at least at one of the end positions and to translate along the path between the end positions upon experiencing a net translational force comprising a first translational force caused by energization of the at least electromagnetic source (coils 82′) and a latching force based upon position of the permanent magnet source (magnet 86′) relative to the position of the translator structure 84′ along the path.
The structure 84′ also includes two pair of spaced legs or pins 92′ which travel in a pair of spaced carved slots 93′ defined by bent brackets 97′ which are coupled to a steel plate 94′. The pins 92′ are secured in apertures 91′ formed in opposite sides of the translator structure 84′.
The stator structure 80′ also preferably includes a pair of spaced steel plates 94′ which help to complete the path of magnetic flux. The steel plates 94′ may include apertures 96′ and the opposite side surfaces of the structure 84′ may also include apertures 96′ to seat one or more springs 98′ which exert a biasing force on the translator structure 84′. As a result, the net translational force further includes the biasing force caused by the biasing members 98′.
The subassembly of
The following is a description of how the embodiment of
In the “off” position, one preferably needs about 15 lbs of holding force (Latch Force+spring force) in one of the end positions of the translator structure 84′.
The entire stroke of the slide plate 26 is about 8 mm. That corresponds to about 5 degrees of travel of the plate 26. If the clutch is “torque locked” going from ON to OFF, that stroke is less than 2.5 degrees before the slide plate 26 makes contact with the back side of the locked struts 22 (
The clutch is “on” holding at magnetic latch force—return spring force in the ON position is applying a force towards the OFF direction. The spring force is at a max value because it is at its most compressed trying to move the slide plate 26 to the OFF position (of
The coils 82′ are now “turned on” to cancel the latch force caused by the magnet 86′ and stroke the slide plate 26. The plate 26 moves only a little bit off the latch because the struts 22 are torque locked (less than 2.5 degrees of rotation). The slide plate 26 is being held against the back of the strut 22 primarily by the spring force and whatever force the energized coils 82′ are pushing against the force caused by the magnet 26′.
If this is a momentary device, meaning that one pulses the coils 82′ “on” to unlatch and stroke, then turn the coils 82′ “off”. It is at this point in time that when the coils 82′ are turned “off” and the translator structure 84′ is less than ½ thru the stroke, the only force acting on the slide plate 26 going toward the “off” position is spring force. There is a counter force from the latch ON direction as soon as the power is cut. So at this small stroke, the spring force needs to be greater than the weakened ON latch force. This force is weakened because the gap has increased via the stroke. So the requirement would be: spring force>Weakened ON latch force at the distance the slide plate 26 makes contact with the back of the struts 22.
The above condition is maintained until there is a torque reversal in the clutch freeing up the locked struts 22. The return springs 98′ are now free to move the slide plate 26 to the OFF position. As the stroke goes over center via the return springs 98′, the OFF magnetic latch starts to enforce the spring force. And as the slide plate 26 approaches the OFF position, the enforcing magnetic force to the return spring force grows stronger.
So a good design of the latch force would be one that is very high at the end positions of travel (greater than the spring force) of the stroke and weakens quickly as the translator structure 84′ moves away from the end positions such that the return springs 98′ are the primary force during the stroke and the magnet force is less.
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Application 61/882,694 filed Sep. 26, 2013. This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/370,507 filed Feb. 10, 2012. That application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/218,817 filed Aug. 26, 2011 which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of U.S. national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/US11/36636 filed May 16, 2011 which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/421,868 filed Dec. 10, 2010. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/931,770 filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2863326 | Maurice et al. | Dec 1958 | A |
2866109 | Watson | Dec 1958 | A |
2947537 | Littell et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
2959062 | Looker | Nov 1960 | A |
2960287 | Barlow | Nov 1960 | A |
2966975 | Wiedmann et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
2969134 | Wiedmann et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
3130989 | Lannen | Apr 1964 | A |
4050560 | Torstenfelt | Sep 1977 | A |
4340133 | Blersch | Jul 1982 | A |
4651847 | Hermanns | Mar 1987 | A |
5046594 | Kakinuma | Sep 1991 | A |
5052534 | Gustin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5070978 | Pires | Dec 1991 | A |
5206573 | McCleer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5231265 | Hackett et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5342258 | Egyed | Aug 1994 | A |
5362293 | Romanauskas | Nov 1994 | A |
5387854 | McCleer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394321 | McCleer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5453598 | Hackett et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5597057 | Ruth et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5638929 | Park | Jun 1997 | A |
5642009 | McCleer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5678668 | Sink | Oct 1997 | A |
5827148 | Seto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846257 | Hood | Dec 1998 | A |
5847469 | Tabata et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856709 | Ibaraki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5918715 | Ruth et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924510 | Itoh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927455 | Baker et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6019699 | Hoshiya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6065576 | Shaw et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075302 | McCleer | Jun 2000 | A |
6193038 | Scott et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237931 | Marola | May 2001 | B1 |
6244965 | Klecker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6290044 | Burgman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306057 | Morisawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328670 | Minowa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344008 | Nagano et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6503167 | Sturm | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6692405 | Minowa et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6814201 | Thomas | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827167 | Cikanek et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6846257 | Baker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6905009 | Reed et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6953409 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6982502 | Sendaula et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7093512 | Ibamoto et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153228 | Fujiu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198587 | Samie et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201690 | Miura et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223198 | Kimes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223200 | Kojima et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7255186 | Wakuta et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7256510 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258214 | Pawley et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275628 | Pawley et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7344010 | Fetting, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349010 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7393296 | Kano et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397296 | Kiani | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7426971 | Kano et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7464801 | Wittkopp | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484605 | Pawley et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491151 | Maguire et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7614466 | Kano et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621359 | Kano et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7690455 | Kano et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695387 | Oba | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7743678 | Wittkopp et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806795 | Oba et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7898121 | Ramsay et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7942781 | Kimes | May 2011 | B2 |
7992695 | Wittkopp et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8051959 | Eisengruber | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8061496 | Samie et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8079453 | Kimes | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8286772 | Eisengruber | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8443956 | Bauer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20010049306 | Tanaka | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040110594 | Goto | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040159517 | Thomas | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040238306 | Reed et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060138777 | Hofbauer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185957 | Kimes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060252589 | Tay | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278487 | Pawley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070034470 | Fetting, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056825 | Fetting, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107960 | Takami et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070278061 | Wittkopp et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080093190 | Belmont | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080110715 | Pawley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080169165 | Samie et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169166 | Wittkopp et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185253 | Kimes | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223681 | Stevenson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245360 | Almy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277891 | Adams, III et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090084653 | Holmes | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098968 | Maguire et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098970 | Kimes | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127059 | Knoblauch | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133981 | Tarasinski et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142207 | Ring et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159391 | Eisengruber | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194381 | Samie et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211863 | Kimes | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090255773 | Seufert et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100044141 | Kimes et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071497 | Reisch et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100119389 | Lazebnik et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100200358 | Eisengruber et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100230226 | Prout | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252384 | Eisengruber | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110011694 | Swales et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110140451 | Sharples et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177900 | Simon | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110183806 | Wittkopp et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192697 | Prout et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110215575 | Hofbauer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110233026 | Pawley | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120090952 | Lee | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120145505 | Kimes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120145506 | Samie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152683 | Kimes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152687 | Kimes et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140102844 | Greene et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140190785 | Fetting et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140284167 | Kimes | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1007475 | Oct 1965 | GB |
09196128 | Jul 1997 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion; related international application No. PCT/US2014/057140; date of mailing Feb. 26, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International application No. PCT/US14/56749; date of mailing Dec. 24, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US2011/036636; mailed Aug. 26, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US2011/036634; mailed Aug. 25, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US2012/025046; date of mailing May 21, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US2012/050742; date of mailing Nov. 20, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US2012/50749; date of mailing Dec. 11, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; International application No. PCT/US2012/025046; date of issuance of report Aug. 21, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; International application No. PCT/US2012/050749; date of issuance of report Mar. 4, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; International application No. PCT/US2012/050742; date of issuance of report Mar. 4, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; International application No. PCT/US2012/050753; date of issuance of report Mar. 25, 2014. |
Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,507; date of mailing Aug. 27, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; related international application No. PCT/US2014/056716; date of mailing Mar. 3, 2015. |
Office Action; related U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,234; notification date Feb. 11, 2016. |
Notice of Rejection; English Summary; related Japanese application No. 2013-553658; draft date Dec. 24, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; related International application No. PCT/US2014/056716; date of issuance of report Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; related International application No. PCT/US2014/056749; date of issuance of report Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; related International application No. PCT/US2014/057140; date of issuance of report Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; related International application No. PCT/US2016/013836; date of mailing Mar. 30, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due; related U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,507; date mailed Dec. 18, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150001023 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61882694 | Sep 2013 | US | |
61421868 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61931770 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13370507 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 14488673 | US | |
Parent | 13218817 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13370507 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2011/036636 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13218817 | US |