This invention generally relates to elevator systems. More particularly, this invention relates to door locking systems for elevators.
Elevators typically include a car that moves vertically through a hoistway between different levels of a building. At each level or landing, a set of hoistway doors are arranged to close off the hoistway when the elevator car is not at that landing and to open with doors on the car to allow access to or from the elevator car when it is at the landing. It is necessary to have the hoistway doors locked when the car is in motion or not appropriately positioned at a landing to prevent an individual from opening the hoistway doors, exposing the hoistway. Conventional arrangements include mechanical locks for keeping the hoistway doors locked under appropriate conditions.
Conventional arrangements include a door interlock that typically integrates several functions into a single device. The interlocks lock the hoistway doors, sense that the hoistway doors are locked and couple the hoistway doors to the car doors for opening purposes. While such integration of multiple functions provides lower material costs, there are significant design challenges presented by conventional arrangements. For example, the locking and sensing functions must be precise to satisfy codes. The coupling function, on the other hand, requires a significant amount of tolerance to accommodate variations in the position of the car doors relative to the hoistway doors. While these two functions are typically integrated into a single device, their design implications are usually competing with each other.
The competing considerations associated with conventional interlock arrangements results in a significant number of call backs or maintenance requests. It is believed that elevator door system components account for approximately 50% of elevator maintenance requests and 30% of callbacks. Almost half of the callbacks due to a door system malfunction are related to one of the interlock functions.
There is a need in the industry for an improved arrangement that provides the security of a locked hoistway door, yet avoids the complexities of conventional arrangements and provides a more reliable arrangement that has reduced need for maintenance. This invention addresses that need with a unique elevator door lock assembly.
An exemplary embodiment of this invention is an elevator door lock assembly that includes an electromagnetic actuator that selectively locks or unlocks the assembly.
In one example, a locking member for locking a hoistway door is moved between a locking position and an unlocked position by the electromagnetic actuator. In this example, the electromagnetic actuator includes a first electromagnetic member supported for movement with an elevator car. A second electromagnetic member is associated with the locking member. Magnetic interaction between the first and second members when the elevator car is appropriately positioned relative to the hoistway doors is operative to move the locking member in a selected direction.
In one example, the first and second electromagnetic members are ferromagnetic cores and a magnetic flux in one of the cores influences the other and causes movement of the locking member responsive to the presence of the magnetic flux. By appropriately controlling power to the assembly, the magnetic flux can be controlled and the door lock can be manipulated into an opened or closed position in a reliable manner.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The example embodiment includes an electromagnetic door lock assembly 30 having an electromagnetic actuator for selectively locking or unlocking the hoistway doors 22. As schematically shown in
When the second portion 34 and the first portion 32 are appropriately aligned (i.e., when the car 24 is properly positioned at the landing), the electromagnetic actuator controls the operating condition of the door lock assembly 30. In a discussed example, the electromagnetic actuator unlocks the door assembly to provide access to or from the car 24.
Referring to
The moveable portion 38 cooperates with a strike member 40 that provides a door lock function to prevent the hoistway doors 22 from being opened under appropriate conditions. The moveable portion 38 in this example acts as a latch member that cooperates with the strike member 40 for selectively locking the doors.
In the example of
The example of
In the position shown in
Also in this condition, there are air gaps 60 between the stationary portions 36A and 36B on the one hand and the moveable portion 38 on the other hand.
In this example, the switch 50 is closed responsive to the car 24 arriving at the landing and responding to a call, for example so that the car doors 26 will open. In order for the hoistway doors 22 to open, the lock assembly 30 must be unlocked and the magnetic cooperation between the first portion 32 and the second portion 34 unlocks the doors. As can be appreciated from this example, the lock assembly 30 has an electromagnetic actuator that selectively locks the doors 22 when deenergized and unlocks the doors 22 when energized as the car is appropriately positioned, for example.
In this example, the end 74 of the armature 68 associated with the locking bolt 70 is heavier than an opposite end so that the armature 68 is biased by gravity into the locked position shown in
Some embodiments have single actuators and locking members like the disclosed examples that are the exclusive locking mechanism. Other examples include more than one locking member, more than one actuator or more than one of both. Choosing an appropriate number will become apparent to one skilled in the art who has the benefit of this description to satisfy packaging constraints or redundancy criteria, for example.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/021576 | 7/6/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/19/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/014164 | 2/9/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1344430 | Wigmore et al. | Jun 1920 | A |
1736805 | Simmons et al. | Nov 1929 | A |
3413026 | Kendrick et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3554326 | Hallene et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3638762 | Johns | Feb 1972 | A |
4009767 | Stadigh | Mar 1977 | A |
4410067 | Leiner et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4934488 | Umemura | Jun 1990 | A |
5174417 | Pilsbury | Dec 1992 | A |
5476157 | Todaro | Dec 1995 | A |
5655627 | Horne et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5730254 | Nguyen | Mar 1998 | A |
5819877 | Rivera et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5894911 | Bozogzadeh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6006866 | Horne et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021871 | Grabner | Feb 2000 | A |
6070700 | Nagel | Jun 2000 | A |
6446759 | Kulak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467585 | Gozzo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6495821 | Smith et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6732839 | Schuster | May 2004 | B2 |
20040055829 | Morris et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2185775 | Dec 1994 | CN |
2814162 | Mar 2002 | FR |
3102091 | Apr 1991 | JP |
05338973 | Dec 1993 | JP |
2006009536 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006009547 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006036146 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006041450 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080271959 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |