Patent Application
20050143875
The present invention relates to an electromechanical control system for watercrafts, motorboats, ships or the like, having at least: a control station, an engine, an electromechanical actuator associated to said engine, a signal transmission device for transmitting a control signal generated by the control station to an electronic control and monitoring unit, and further having a signal transmission device for transmitting an actuating signal, generated by the electronic control and monitoring unit as a function of the control signal and transmitted to said electromechanical actuator for actuating the control.
Such apparatuses are well known in the art and widely used. While these apparatuses satisfactorily serve their function, they still suffer from certain drawbacks.
It is known that a control signal set by the user from the control device, e.g. a control lever, which control device allows a mechanical or electromechanical control, for instance, of the throttle or a fuel flow meter device for controlling flow to the watercraft engine, causes the throttle to open and a higher flow of fuel to reach the engine. The greater fuel flow causes the engine to increase the number of its operating revolutions per minute and, as a result, its power. Nevertheless, those skilled in the art are aware that the opening of the throttle and/or the increased fuel flow generated by the flow meter device, causing a corresponding increase of the engine's rpm, does not linearly correspond to an increase of the power delivered by the engine, because no linear relationship exists between power and fuel delivery in the equation that regulates engine operation. Particularly, their relationship is of the nonlinear type and differs from linearity especially in multiple cylinder gasoline and diesel engines.
Due to this nonlinearity, a control corresponding for instance to 50% of the maximum control lever range, does not cause a proportional 50% increase of the delivered power, which may be higher or lower depending, as mentioned above, on additional parameters, such as the number of revolutions at which the throttle opens.
Hence, the angular displacement of the control lever may lead to an increase of the delivered power that may considerably differ from one situation to the other, and this may affect an easy control of the watercraft.
This drawback is particularly felt when the watercraft driving conditions must be fast and accurate, for instance in mooring or harbor maneuvers, where an unexpected power increase might have undesired consequences, such as an impact against the quay or other moored vessels. Also, this problem is particularly felt with small watercrafts, whose pilots sometimes do not have sufficient expertise to control a watercraft in case of a sudden speed increase caused by an increase of the power delivered by the engine, which is controlled by the pilot through the control lever, which engine, as mentioned above, does not react linearly to the displacement of the control lever.
In prior art, the delivered power may be controlled while maneuvering, but at the maximum angular displacement of the control lever it does not correspond to the maximum fuel flow delivered by the flow meter device and/or by the throttle. This kind of control is simple but poorly effective, as the relationship between the displacement of the control lever and the opening of the throttle and/or flow meter device is still linear, which causes a non linearity of the power delivered to the engine, for the above reasons. Hence, the above problems are not solved by prior art, which only reduces the maximum opening of the throttle, to allow the user to have an easier, but not optimized control of the watercraft.
Furthermore, in prior art arrangements, nonlinear power delivery cause problems not only during maneuvers, but also in offshore navigation; it may be easily understood that serious problems may arise whenever a total control of the watercraft is needed, such as when other vessels are encountered, in rough sea conditions, or the like.
Furthermore, in addition to not being able to linearize the delivered power by displacing the control lever, prior art system do not even allow to set a different acceleration “profile”. Such different profile may be useful when the user decides to use a personal drive style, an up to 50% control lever displacement involving a power increase of up to 30% of the maximum power, and a 50% to 100% control lever displacement involving a power increase of 30% to 100%, or less, of the maximum deliverable power. Such an exemplified customized delivering arrangement provides a very smooth control of the watercraft at low speeds, which is particularly useful in coastwise navigation, where other vessels, swimmers or divers are very likely to be encountered. Also, the normal delivery obtained in prior art systems does not allow to configure the maximum opening that may be reached by the throttle and/or the maximum fuel flow delivered by the fuel flow meter device, at the maximum control lever displacement, with a variable profile. Thus, prior art systems do not allow to set the delivery in “power saving” drive conditions, in which the throttle has an 80% maximum opening, allowing to save fuel and reduce the wear of the engine.
The nonlinearity between the control set by the control lever and the delivered power in prior art systems further involves a number of other drawbacks, associated for instance to the difficulties encountered by inexperienced pilots of watercrafts: an inexpert user may easily make evaluation errors, and as a consequence, driving errors, which may lead to unexpected consequences; consider, for instance, a user who is learning how to drive, and during a narrow turn, inadvertently displaces the control lever and causes a sudden and unexpected engine power increase. Due to such errors, an inexperienced user may lose the control of the watercraft, which may lead to easily guessable consequences.
Furthermore, in prior art systems, where the signal of the control station associated to the control lever is transmitted to an electromechanical actuator which is designed to control the throttle and/or a fuel and/or fuel-air mixture flow meter device, there is no system for checking proper transmission of the control signal and for making an action, when needed, to prevent any drawback deriving from an improper signal transmission. Consider, for instance, a system in which the wrong control signal is transmitted as it is to the actuator; this involves a considerable danger, as a wrong maximum control lever displacement signal during a maneuver in narrow spaces leads to a number of problems, such as collisions of considerable importance. Also, when no communication exists between the control station and the actuator, in prior art apparatuses the actuator signal is kept unchanged, which may also lead to considerable drawbacks, both during harbor maneuvers and during free navigation when other vessels, swimmers, divers or obstacles are encountered, and the lack of communication prevents any deceleration or reversing maneuvers.
Prior art apparatuses further have a drawback which is associated to the fact that, when the direction of the propeller rotation is reversed, by a backward displacement of the control lever, the opening of the throttle is linear with the backward displacement of the control lever, whereby the user who has to deal with the above discussed nonlinear delivery, is subjected to the same drawbacks as mentioned above, and to the additional problem that the watercraft is, for instance, moving astern, and is difficult to maneuver.
The object of the present invention is to provide an electromechanical control system, particularly for marine applications, according to the preamble of claim 1, which may simply and inexpensively obviate the drawbacks of prior art electromechanical control systems, particularly for marine applications.
The invention fulfils the above objects by providing an electromechanical control system for watercrafts, motorboats, ships or the like, having at least: a control station, an engine, an electromechanical actuator associated to said engine, a signal transmission device for transmitting a control signal generated by the control station to an electronic control and monitoring unit as a function of the control signal and transmitted to said electromechanical actuator for actuating the signal, and further having a signal transmission device for transmitting an actuating signal, generated by the electronic control and monitoring unit as a function of the control signal and transmitted to said electromechanical actuator for actuating the control, characterized in that said electronic control and monitoring unit establishes a unique correspondence between the control signal and the actuating signal by using a table of correspondence between discretized values of control signals and actuating signals and/or by determining the actuating signal value from the control signal by means of a mathematical function.
In a preferred arrangement, the invention includes a control station associated to a control device for the user to set a control signal, said control setting device being able to be displaced relative to a fixed reference, its displacement being related to a control signal value, with electric, electronic and/or electromechanical means being associated to said control device, for detecting the displacement of the control device and for generating a control signal that is uniquely related with said displacement. In a preferred arrangement, the control device is provided in the form of a lever that pivots about a fulcrum, having known systems for electric/electronic detection of the angular displacement (BETA) of the lever, which is turned into an electric/electronic control signal. Such control signal is transmitted to the programmable electronic control and monitoring unit through said signal transmission devices in the form of a CAN BUS. The electronic control and monitoring unit stores one or more tables of unique correlation between the control signal corresponding to the angular position (BETA) of the control lever and the actuating signal corresponding to the angular position (ALFA) of the actuating lever and/or the flow meter or control device. Alternatively, according to an alternative preferred embodiment, the electronic control unit stores, in the form of a program code to be executed thereby, one or more different functions of unique correlation between the control signal corresponding to the angular position (BETA) of the control lever and the actuating signal corresponding to the angular position (ALFA) of the actuating lever and/or the flow meter or control device, the corresponding actuating signal being determined from time to time, for each control signal, by using one of said correlation functions.
The actuating signal so generated by the electronic control and monitoring unit is transmitted by the electronic control and monitoring unit to said actuator through the signal transmission devices, preferably in the form of a CAN bus. The actuator has a pivoting actuating lever which acts on the device for delivering fuel and/or fuel-air mixture of/to the engine and/or on a flow meter or control device having a flow metering or controlling member that can be angularly displaced about a predetermined axis, which lever and/or which flow meter or control device take a predetermined angular position (ALFA) relative to a stationary reference, as a function of the angular position (BETA) of the control lever relative to the corresponding stationary reference.
In a further preferred embodiment, the device for delivering fuel and/or air-fuel mixture of/to the engine and/or the flow meter or control device having a flow metering or controlling member are a throttle which controls the fuel flow and flow rate; in this case, the mathematical correspondence functions associated to the electronic control and monitoring unit establish such a unique correspondence between the control signal and the actuating signal that ALFA=f(BETA), where BETA is the control lever displacement angle and ALFA is the throttle opening angle and where f is any mathematical function having BETA as a variable.
A memory may be preferably associated to said electronic control unit, preferably a nonvolatile memory, and means for loading in such memory one or more correlation functions f(BETA) and/or tables of correspondence between the angle of the actuating lever and/or of the flow meter or control device and/or of a throttle (ALFA) and the angle (BETA) of a control lever.
The mathematical function f(BETA) is such that, given an angular displacement BETA, the displacement angle ALFA is determined as a result of the computation, by entering the BETA value in the function. Thus, the angular displacement of the control lever may be physically linked to the angular displacement of the throttle controlling lever even in a nonlinear manner, for instance according to a parabolic or hyperbolic function or a mathematical rule which produces any function whatever. Hence, the actual result of the invention is that the throttle opening may be perfectly programmable as a function of the control lever displacement angle.
Alternatively, preset tables of correspondence may be used, which may be loaded into the memory of the electronic control and monitoring unit, to make any correspondence whatever between BETA and ALFA, by associating any BETA value to a corresponding ALFA value, while possibly providing a linear interpolation between the preset values.
The operation of the inventive system is as follows: the user actuates the control device, e.g. the control lever, and the control signal so generated, i.e. the angular displacement BETA of the control lever is received by usual electric, electronic or electromechanical systems and is preferably digitized and transmitted through a CAN bus to the electronic control and monitoring unit. The electronic control and monitoring unit computes the preset function and provides, as a result of such computation, a control signal to be transferred, still preferably through a CAN bus, to the actuator, which accordingly actuates the fuel flow meter or control device and/or the throttle of the engine. By this arrangement, the displacement of the control lever may trigger any power response engine, possibly a nonlinear response.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment, at least one table of correspondence between the control signal value BETA and the actuating signal value ALFA is stored in a preferably nonvolatile memory of the electronic control and monitoring unit. Hence, the actuating signal is generated by a comparison in the table of correspondence by entering the BETA value therein. The BETA value and the corresponding ALFA value may be further freely interpolated between two predetermined values when they have not been previously stored in the electronic control and monitoring unit.
In a preferred variant embodiment, a variety of mathematical functions may be stored in the nonvolatile memory associated to said electronic control unit, and the setting, i.e. the selection of the mathematical function or the table of correspondence is preferably effected by using selectors, whose various combinations correspond to different mathematical functions and/or tables of correspondence which relate ALFA and BETA. These selectors are preferably a set of DIP switches. A certain number of combinations of switching conditions of the switches of the set is uniquely related as a selection code with one of the various correlation functions f (BETA) or a different table of correspondence, furthermore each switching combination of the set of DIP switches provides a control to load said corresponding correlation function or correlation table in the working storage of the control electronics. The memory of the electronic control and monitoring unit may be further adapted to be reprogrammed several times. Therefore, the user may select beforehand a desired kind of drive by setting the correspondence between ALFA and BETA given by the different functions, which corresponds to a different power response behavior of the engine, hence a different behavior of the watercraft.
The user decides the desired function and/or table of correspondence by selecting an appropriate combination of DIP switches, hence the table and/or the function will be loaded by the electronic control and monitoring unit in the working storage.
Amongst the various functions, a predetermined function, for instance, may be provided and programmed for maneuvering, in which, while providing a perfect linearity between the angular displacement of the control lever and the delivered power, the maximum delivered power may be arranged to be 30% of the maximum power delivered by the engine. This allows to obviate prior art problems associated to nonlinear power delivery, which affect the ease of drive.
Also, a function ALFA=f(BETA) may be preset, whose result is to obtain, providing a maximum power of 100% of the maximum deliverable power, a curve of power delivery that is linear with the displacement of the control lever, so that the maximum power is by no way reduced, but in such a manner as to provide an easier drive and a better control of the watercraft, while actually preventing any drive errors associated to a sudden acceleration of the watercraft caused by an unexpected engine power increase, like in the above discussed prior art.
A “power saving” drive function might be further programmed in the electronic control unit, which corresponds, for instance, to a maximum throttle opening equal to 80% of the maximum opening, or equal to 80% of the maximum deliverable power, and a user selected profile may be provided, to allow a power saving drive, with consequent fuel savings, a lower engine wear, and an effective control of the delivered power.
Thus, this invention allows to program and set several different watercraft acceleration profiles, to configure a wholly customized watercraft drive, which may be hence adapted to a number of different requirements. For example, a function may be programmed and set whereby a 50% displacement of the control lever involves a linear increase of the delivered power of up to 30% of the maximum power, and a 50% to 100% displacement of the control lever involves a power increase of 30% to 100%, or less, of the maximum deliverable power. Such delivering arrangement provides a very smooth control of the watercraft at low speeds, which is particularly useful in coastwise navigation, where other vessels, swimmers or divers are very likely to be encountered and where an accurate control of the watercraft is imperative.
This also allows to obviate prior art drawbacks associated to a possible sudden increase of the delivered power during a narrow turn; thanks to the linearity between the control lever displacement and the delivered power, the user is not exposed to such danger, unless such power increase is caused by a voluntary excessive displacement of control lever.
Also, according to this invention, several functions f′ (BETA) may be programmed and set, exactly like the functions f(BETA), to be used when the displacement of the control lever has a negative value. Assuming that the central control lever position corresponds to a situation of no delivery and to a minimum throttle opening, typically in watercrafts, a fore displacement of the control lever causes a forward motion of the watercraft, due to the actuator-controlled opening of the throttle, whereas an aft displacement of the control lever triggers an inverter, which drives the propeller in reverse rotation, so that the watercraft is pushed backwards due to the reverse rotation of the propeller and to the opening of the throttle. Here, the angular displacement BETA of the control lever is negative. This negative displacement may be associated, thanks to the electronic control and monitoring unit of this invention, to a function f′ (BETA) that is different from f(BETA), for instance programmed in such a manner that the reversing maneuver of the watercraft is facilitated, with an enhanced linearity in the first portion of the control lever range and a maximum deliverable power of less than 100%. The drive is thus dramatically facilitated as compared with prior art systems, in which the acceleration of the watercraft in reverse motion was essentially equal to forward motion acceleration.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the electronic control and monitoring unit may be designed to monitor signal transmission from the control station to the throttle actuator. This allows to overcome the above mentioned prior art problems associated to a lack of the monitoring capability. According to the present invention, the electronic control and monitoring unit monitors the communication and, when a wrong signal or a lack of signal is detected in the control station, the electronic control unit brings the throttle controlling lever in the minimum opening condition, and the inverter is brought in the neutral position, while the user receives an error warning by optical and/or acoustic signals. The throttle controlling lever remains in the minimum opening condition and the inverter remains in the neutral position until the error is acknowledged by the electronic control and monitoring unit and/or the user possibly selects a different control station.
This allows to obviate the prior art problems associated, for example, to a system in which the wrong control signal is transmitted as it is to the actuator, involving a considerable danger, as a wrong maximum control lever displacement signal during a maneuver in narrow spaces leads to a number of problems, such as collisions of considerable importance, which problems are avoided by using a device according to this invention. Also, when no communication exists between the control station and the actuator, in prior art apparatuses the actuator signal is kept unchanged, which may also lead to considerable drawbacks, both during harbor maneuvers and during free navigation when other vessels, swimmers, divers or obstacles are encountered, and the lack of communication prevents any deceleration or reversing maneuvers whereas, according to this invention, no thrust is exerted on the watercraft by the engine, and the user is immediately warned thereof and has the time to take over control of the watercraft and avoids any drawback deriving from a lack of communication or a wrong communication between the control station and the actuator.
In an additional preferred application, this invention provides the use of multiple control stations, each with one or more control levers. Here, there may be provided as many control and monitoring electronic units as actuators, with exactly the same operation as discussed above. Alternatively, due to cost and space saving reasons, there may be provided a single control and monitoring electronic unit, for the management of all communications and all control signals set on the different control levers and on the corresponding actuators. In this case, the control stations are typically equipped with a toggle switch, which is controlled by the user to inform the electronic control and monitoring unit about the user selected control station to drive the watercraft. Hence, the control and monitoring electronic unit which receives the angular control lever displacement signal BETA from the selected control station, processes the signal as described above for a single station, and computes the displacement ALFA of the throttle controlling actuator lever by the function f(BETA).
If a single control and monitoring electronic unit is provided, this may provide a number of different functions f(BETA) associated to the different control levers, particularly a specific control lever may be associated to the function f(BETA) used for harbor maneuvers, and a different control station is associated to a function f(BETA) used, for instance, for power saving navigation, as described above. Nevertheless, the various stations may be associated either to the same or different functions f(BETA), so that the watercraft may be easily and flexibly driven, to meet different user requirements.
In the latter case, which provides a single control and monitoring electronic unit, the latter may be also used for the above mentioned control signal transmission checking function.
In accordance with another characteristic, the table of correspondence may be advantageously formed as follows: all predetermined BETA values may be first entered, to determine the corresponding ALFA values, otherwise only some BETA and ALFA values are entered, in which case the omitted intermediate values are determined by the electronic control and monitoring unit by an interpolation, which may be a linear, a least-squares interpolation or any other type of interpolation, other than the ones mentioned above.
Hence, when the user moves the control lever through a given angle BETA, the displacement value is detected by the control electronic unit, which compares it with the value in the table of correspondence. If the BETA value is equal to a previously set value, the corresponding ALFA value is directly read from the table. Conversely, if the BETA value is somewhere between two different set values, without corresponding to none of them, the electronic control and monitoring unit interpolates the value in any manner to provide the interpolated ALFA value.
Moreover, according to a preferred embodiment, the above table of correspondence may be set either into a nonvolatile memory, and selected by using the DIP-SWITCHES as described above, or directly through special devices in the control station during use. This allows the user the set BETA and ALFA values before, during or after operation, directly from the control station, by selecting a control configuration e.g. adapted to sea conditions, thereby making the inventive device even more flexible. Here, the control station may be associated to an input keypad through which said values may be entered.
The system of this invention may further provide a feedback to the control and monitoring electronic unit, particularly the engine speed, i.e. the number of revolutions made by the engine may be transmitted as a signal to the control unit which, in a preferred embodiment, may use such number of revolutions to appropriately set the ALFA value and/or to check for any abnormalities or errors in the system. For example, the displacement value ALFA may have to correspond to a given engine rpm value and, thanks to such feedback, the electronic control and monitoring unit might check the compliance with this value and the proper transmission of the control signal to the actuator. It may be easily understood for instance that, assuming a 10% throttle opening, the engine rpm cannot and must not be close to the maximum speed. If this occurs, there is an apparent system error, and the feedback allows to detect this error and to take the precautionary measures described above. Also, thanks to the feedback of a signal from the engine and/or the actuator, such signal may be used by the electronic control and monitoring unit and/or by the control station to check and/or monitor and/or set the above values of the table of correspondence. Therefore, the operation may be as follows: the user sets a certain engine rpm and selects, through a combination of keys, a control lever displacement corresponding to the set rpm. Therefore, the electronic control and monitoring unit uses the feedback from the engine, i.e. its rpm, which is a function of the angular displacement ALFA, and through the control lever displacement BETA, it creates a table of correspondence as selected by the user.
An additional characteristic of the invention is that, in some preferred embodiments, the electronic control and monitoring unit stores the sequence of detected errors. As described above, the electronic control and monitoring unit detects any control system operation errors, warns the user thereof, and in some cases takes appropriate danger preventing measures. In a preferred embodiment, the electronic control and monitoring unit also associates a code to any detected error type, and stores the rate of occurrence of the error. Hence, the electronic control and monitoring equipment may monitor any error occurring in the system and the number of occurrences of such error. The electronic control and monitoring unit may also monitor any engine and actuator malfunctions, and once more associate a code to each error and/or malfunction. All errors and malfunctions are identified as such by the electronic control and monitoring unit substantially through two preferred arrangements: according to the first arrangement, known sensors are provided to check operation and to transmit a wrong operation signal to the electronic control and monitoring unit whenever an abnormality occurs in the subsystem wherewith they are associated. In the second arrangement, the electronic control and monitoring unit generates an operation history for the control system, the engine and its parts and the actuator, and for any other system or subsystem of the watercraft which is connected to the electronic control and monitoring unit to transmit an operation signal thereto. Thus, the electronic control and monitoring unit may compare the operation signal it receives from any watercraft subsystem to identify any abnormality, i.e. any signal that excessively differs from the history of identical signals that was previously generated by the above mentioned detection. The electronic control and monitoring unit may provide not only a list of the occurrences and types of malfunctions in the control system as such, but also a list of the occurrences and types or errors and malfunctions of the watercraft part under its control. Therefore, the result of said monitoring action by the electronic control and monitoring unit may be advantageously used for maintenance purposes. This result may be displayed and/or printed and/or electronically transmitted to the user or to the watercraft maintenance personnel and/or communicated in any other manner, whereby watercraft maintenance may be well targeted, hence more effective. It will be understood, for instance, that if the electronic control and monitoring unit detects several control signal transmission errors at the remote control station, then the remote control station ought to be first checked out and possibly repaired and/or serviced. Advantages of such monitoring are apparent in terms of reduction of both times and costs for maintenance and troubleshooting. The electronic control and monitoring unit may be further used for self-checking and for providing both the complete error code and occurrence list and the suggested preventive maintenance. To this end, a list of errors and occurrences, associated to the recommended preventive maintenance, might be entered in the electronic control and monitoring unit. The electronic control and monitoring unit checks the history of system and/or subsystem and/or engine and or actuator error and/or malfunction signals and then may be able to generate, by comparison, a preventive maintenance warning, which may be useful for the user and/or the maintenance personnel for maintenance purposes.
Further characteristics and improvements will form the subject of the claims appended hereto.
The characteristics of the invention and the advantages derived therefrom will be more apparent from the following detailed description of the detailed figures, in which:
In
FIGS. 1 to 4 show the different applications of the invention. The invention may be implemented as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, if BETA designates the displacement angle of the control lever that generates the input signal for the electronic control unit, and ALFA designates the throttle opening angle generated by the actuator by means of said lever, the control signal, i.e. the angular displacement BETA of the control lever is received by usual electric, electronic or electromechanical systems and is digitized and transmitted to the electronic control and monitoring unit 4, which computes the preset function and provides, as a result of such computation, a control signal which is transferred, still preferably through a CAN bus 3, to the actuator 2, which accordingly actuates the fuel throttle of the engine. By this arrangement, the displacement of the control lever 101 may provide a nonlinear throttle response.
In a preferred variant embodiment, a variety of mathematical functions may be stored into a nonvolatile memory associated to said electronic control unit 4, and the setting of the mathematical function or table of correspondence is preferably effected by using DIP switches, not shown, whose various combinations correspond to different mathematical functions and/or tables of correspondence (as shown in
Particularly a specific control lever 101′ may be associated to the function f(BETA) used for harbor maneuvers, whereas a different control lever 101 is associated to a function f(BETA) used, for instance, for power saving navigation. Nevertheless, the various stations may be associated either to the same or different functions f(BETA), so that the watercraft may be easily and flexibly driven, to meet different user requirements.
The electronic control and monitoring unit 4 may be further associated to a control station with two levers 101, 201, like in
However, if a single control and monitoring electronic unit is provided, this may provide a number of different functions f(BETA) associated to the different control levers, particularly a specific control lever may be associated to the function f(BETA) used for harbor maneuvers, whereas a different control station is associated to a function f(BETA) used for power saving navigation, as described above. Nevertheless, the various stations may be associated either to the same or different functions f(BETA), so that the watercraft may be easily and flexibly driven, to meet different user requirements.
Furthermore, in all the above cases, the electronic control and monitoring unit may be also used for the control signal transmission checking function. This allows to overcome the above mentioned prior art problems associated to a lack of the monitoring capability. According to the present invention, the electronic control and monitoring unit monitors the communication and, when a wrong signal or a lack of signal is detected in the control station, the electronic control unit brings the throttle controlling lever in the minimum opening condition, and the inverter is brought in the neutral position, while the user receives an error warning by optical and/or acoustic signals. The throttle controlling lever remains in the minimum opening condition and the inverter remains in the neutral position until the error is acknowledged by the electronic control and monitoring unit and/or the user possibly selects a different control station.
This allows to obviate the prior art problems associated, for example, to a system in which the wrong control signal is transmitted as it is to the actuator, involving a considerable danger, as a wrong maximum control lever displacement signal during a maneuver in narrow spaces leads to a number of problems, such as collisions of considerable importance, which problems are avoided by using a device according to this invention. Also, when no communication exists between the control station and the actuator, in prior art apparatuses the actuator signal is kept unchanged, which may also lead to considerable drawbacks, both during harbor maneuvers and during free navigation when other vessels, swimmers, divers or obstacles are encountered, and the lack of communication prevents any deceleration or reversing maneuvers whereas, according to this invention, no thrust is exerted on the watercraft by the engine, and the user is immediately warned thereof and has the time to take over control of the watercraft and avoids any drawback deriving from a lack of communication or a wrong communication between the control station and the actuator.
An additional characteristic of the invention is that, in some preferred embodiments, the electronic control and monitoring unit stores the sequence of detected errors. As described above, the electronic control and monitoring unit detects any control system operation errors, warns the user thereof, and in some cases takes appropriate danger preventing measures. In a preferred embodiment, the electronic control and monitoring unit also associates a code to each detected error type, and stores the rate of occurrence of the error. Hence, the electronic control and monitoring equipment may monitor any error occurring in the system and the number of occurrences of such error. The electronic control and monitoring unit may also monitor any engine and actuator malfunctions, and once more associate a code to each error and/or malfunction. All errors and malfunctions are identified as such by the electronic control and monitoring unit substantially through two preferred arrangements: according to the first arrangement, known sensors are provided to check operation and to transmit a wrong operation signal to the electronic control and monitoring unit whenever an abnormality occurs in the subsystem wherewith they are associated. In the second arrangement, the electronic control and monitoring unit generates an operation history for the control system, the engine and its parts and the actuator, and for any other system or subsystem of the watercraft which is connected to the electronic control and monitoring unit to transmit an operation signal thereto. Thus, the electronic control and monitoring unit may compare the operation signal it receives from any watercraft subsystem to identify any abnormality, i.e. any signal that excessively differs from the history of identical signals that was previously generated by the above mentioned detection. The electronic control and monitoring unit may provide not only a list of the occurrences and types of malfunctions in the control system as such, but also a list of the occurrences and types or errors and malfunctions of the watercraft part under its control. Therefore, the result of said monitoring action by the electronic control and monitoring unit may be advantageously used for maintenance purposes. This result may be displayed and/or printed and/or electronically transmitted to the user or to the watercraft maintenance personnel and/or communicated in any other manner, whereby watercraft maintenance may be well targeted, hence more effective. It will be understood, for instance, that if the electronic control and monitoring unit detects several control signal transmission errors at the remote control station, then the remote control station ought to be first checked out and possibly repaired and/or serviced. Advantages of such monitoring are apparent in terms of reduction of both times and costs for maintenance and troubleshooting. The electronic control and monitoring unit may be further used for self-checking and for providing both the complete error code and occurrence list and the suggested preventive maintenance. To this end, a list of errors and occurrences, associated to the recommended preventive maintenance, might be entered in the electronic control and monitoring unit. The electronic control and monitoring unit checks the history of system and/or subsystem and/or engine and or actuator error and/or malfunction signals and then may be able to generate, by comparison, a preventive maintenance warning, which may be useful for the user and/or the maintenance personnel for maintenance purposes.
The system of this invention may further provide a feedback to the control and monitoring electronic unit, particularly the engine speed, i.e. the number of revolutions made by the engine may be transmitted as a signal to the control unit which, in a preferred embodiment, may use such number of revolutions to appropriately set the ALFA value and/or to check for any abnormalities or errors in the system. For example, the displacement value ALFA may have to correspond to a given engine rpm value and, thanks to such feedback, the electronic control and monitoring unit might check the compliance with this value and the proper transmission of the control signal to the actuator. It may be easily understood for instance that, assuming a 10% throttle opening, the engine rpm cannot and must not be close to the maximum speed. If this occurs, there is an apparent system error, and the feedback allows to detect this error and to take the precautionary measures described above. Also, thanks to the feedback of a signal from the engine and/or the actuator, such signal may be used by the electronic control and monitoring unit and/or by the control station to check and/or monitor and/or set the above values of the table of correspondence. Therefore, the operation may be as follows: the user sets a certain engine rpm and selects, through a combination of keys, a control lever displacement corresponding to the set rpm. Therefore, the electronic control and monitoring unit uses the feedback from the engine, i.e. its rpm, which is a function of the angular displacement ALFA, and through the control lever displacement BETA, it creates a table of correspondence as selected by the user.
Regarding the linearity between the control transmitted by the control lever and the throttle opening, controlled by the actuator lever according to prior art, the corresponding diagram is shown in
Due to this nonlinearity, a control set on a control lever, corresponding for instance to 20% of the maximum control lever range, does not cause a proportional 20% increase of the delivered power, which may be higher or lower depending, as mentioned above, on additional parameters, such as the number of revolutions at which the throttle opens.
Conversely, according to the invention, the throttle opening and the displacement of the actuator lever that controls it is preferably nonlinear with the control BETA set on the control lever of the control station, so that the power delivered to the engine may be controlled, to such an extent as to make the delivered power linear with the control lever displacement.
For example,
Nevertheless, many other arrangements may be provided for programming the function ALFA=f(BETA), that may be set on the electronic control unit, two examples whereof are shown, without limitation, in
Hence, when the user moves the control lever through a given angle BETA, the displacement value is detected by the control electronic unit, which compares it with the value in the table of correspondence. If the BETA value is equal to a previously set value, the corresponding ALFA value is directly read from the table. Conversely, if the BETA value is somewhere between two different set values, without corresponding to none of them, the electronic control and monitoring unit interpolates the value in any manner to provide the interpolated ALFA value.
Moreover, according to a preferred embodiment, the above table of correspondence may be set either into a nonvolatile memory, and selected by using the DIP switches as described above, or directly through special devices in the control station during use. This allows the user the set BETA and ALFA values before, during or after operation, directly from the control station, by selecting a control configuration e.g. adapted to sea conditions, thereby making the inventive device even more flexible. Here, the control station may be associated to an input keypad through which said values may be entered.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| SV2003A000046 | Nov 2003 | IT | national |
