Electromechanical devices having etch barrier layers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8368124
  • Patent Number
    8,368,124
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 22, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 5, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
In one embodiment, the invention provides a method for fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device. The method comprises fabricating a first layer comprising a film having a characteristic electromechanical response, and a characteristic optical response, wherein the characteristic optical response is desirable and the characteristic electromechanical response is undesirable; and modifying the characteristic electromechanical response of the first layer by at least reducing charge build up thereon during activation of the micro electromechanical systems device.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to microelectromechanical systems devices. In particular it relates to thin film structures in microelectromechanical systems devices and to electromechanical and optical responses of such thin film structures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Today a wide variety of micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices may be fabricated using microfabrication techniques. Examples of these MEMS devices include motors, pumps, valves, switches, sensors, pixels, etc.


Often these MEMS devices harness principles and phenomena from different domains such as the optical, electrical and mechanical domains. Such principles and phenomena, while seemingly difficult to harness in the macroscopic world, can become extremely useful in the microscopic world of MEMS devices, where such phenomena become magnified. For example, electrostatic forces which are generally considered to be too weak in the macroscopic world to be harnessed, are strong enough in the microscopic world of MEMS devices to activate these devices, often at high speeds and with low power consumption.


Materials used in MEMS devices are generally selected based on their inherent properties in the optical, electrical, and mechanical domains and the characteristic response to input, such as for example, a driving or actuation voltage.


One problem affecting the fabrication of MEMS devices is that in some cases, a material having a highly desirable response to input, for example an optical response to incident light, may also have an undesirable response to input, for example, an electromechanical response to an actuation or driving voltage. To overcome, or at least reduce, the undesirable response, new materials have to be found or developed often at great expense.


Another problem with the fabrication of MEMS devices is that sometimes, a material selected for its characteristic response may become damaged due to exposure to chemical agents used during a particular micro fabrication process. This causes the material to demonstrate less of the characteristic response to the input.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, the invention provides a method for fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device. The method comprises fabricating a first layer comprising a film or structured film having a characteristic electromechanical response, and a characteristic optical response, wherein the characteristic optical response is desirable and the characteristic electromechanical response is undesirable; and modifying the characteristic electromechanical response of the first layer by manipulating charge build up thereon during activation of the micro electromechanical systems device.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1 and 2 show a block diagram of a MEMS device in an unactuated, and an actuated state respectively;



FIG. 3 shows a chart of the actuation and release voltages for the MEMS device of FIGS. 1 and 2;



FIG. 4 shows one embodiment of a thin film stack for a MEMS device, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 5 shows a hysteresis curve for a MEMS device including the thin film stack shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings;



FIG. 6 shows another embodiment of a thin film stack for a MEMS device;



FIG. 7 shows a hysteresis curve for a MEMS device including the thin film stack of FIG. 6 of the drawings;



FIG. 8
a shows a block diagram of an electrostatic fluid flow system within a MEMS device in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 8
b shows a schematic drawing of the fluid flow system of FIG. 8a illustrating its principle of operation; and



FIG. 9 shows another embodiment of a MEMS device in accordance with the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A particular structure or layer within a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device may be desirable for its optical response to input in the form of incident light, but may at the same time have an undesirable electromechanical response to input in the form of an actuation or driving voltage. The present invention discloses techniques to manipulate or control the electromechanical response of the structure or layer, thus at least reducing the undesirable electromechanical response.


As an illustrative, but a non-limiting example of a MEMS device, consider the interference modulator (IMOD) device 10 shown in FIG. 1 of the drawings. Referring to FIG. 1, it will be seen that IMOD device 10 has been greatly simplified for illustrative purposes so as not to obscure aspects of the present invention.


The IMOD device 10 includes a transparent layer 12 and a reflective layer 14 which is spaced from the transparent layer 12 by an air gap 16. The transparent layer 14 is supported on posts 18 and is electrostatically displaceable towards the transparent layer 12 thereby to close the air gap 16. An electrode 20 which is connected to a driving mechanism 22 is used to cause the electrostatic displacement of reflective layer 14. FIG. 1 shows the reflective layer 14 in an undriven or undisplaced condition, whereas FIG. 2 shows the reflective layer 14 in a driven or displaced condition. The reflective layer 14 is generally selected to produce a desired optical response to incident light when it is brought into contact with the transparent layer 12. In one IMOD design, the transparent layer 12 may comprise SiO2. The electrode 20 and the transparent layer 12 are formed on a substrate 24. The substrate 24, the electrode 20, and the transparent layer 12 thereon will be referred to as a “thin film stack.”


Typically, a plurality of IMOD devices 10 are fabricated in a large array so as to form pixels within a reflective display. Within such a reflective display, each IMOD device 10 essentially defines a pixel which has a characteristic optical response when in the undriven state, and a characteristic optical response when in the driven state. The transparent layer 12 and the size of the air gap 16 maybe selected so that an IMOD within the reflective display may reflect red, blue, or green light when in the undriven state and may absorb light when in the driven state.


It will be appreciated that during operation of the reflective display, the IMOD devices 10 are rapidly energized, and de-energized in order to convey information. When energized, the reflective layer 14 of an IMOD 10 device is electrostatically driven towards the transparent layer 12, and when the IMOD 10 is de-energized, the reflective layer 14 is allowed to return to its undriven state. In order to keep the reflective layer 14 in its driven condition, a bias voltage is applied to each IMOD device 10.


If an actuation voltage, Vactuation, defined as a voltage required to electrostatically drive the reflective layer 14 of an IMOD device to its driven condition, as showed in FIG. 2 of the drawings, is equal to a release voltage, Vrelease, defined as the voltage at which the reflective layer 14 returns to its undisplaced condition, as is shown in FIG. 1 of the drawings, then it becomes extremely difficult to select an appropriate bias voltage, Vbias, that can be applied to all of the IMOD's 10 within the reflective display to keep the reflective layers 14 of each respective IMOD device 10 within the reflective display in its driven condition. The reason for this is that each IMOD 10 within the reflective display may have slight variations, for example, variations in a thickness of the layers 12, 14, etc., which, in practice, result in a different release voltage, Vrelease, for each IMOD 10. Further, due to line resistance, there will be variations in the actual voltage applied to each IMOD 10, based on its position within the display. This makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to select a value for Vbias that will keep the reflective layer 14 of each respective IMOD 10 within the reflective display in its driven condition. This is explained with reference to FIG. 3 of the drawings, which shows the observed hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14 of an IMOD 10, in which the transparent layer 12 comprised SiO2.


Referring to FIG. 3, a curve, 30 is shown, which plots applied voltage (in volts) on the X-axis, against optical response measured in the volts on the Y-axis for an IMOD 10 comprising a transparent layer of SiO2. As can be seen, actuation of the reflective layer 14 occurs at about 12.5 volts, i.e., Vactuation equals 12.5 volts, and the reflective layer 14 returns to its undriven condition when the applied voltage falls to below 12.5 volts, i.e., Vrelease, equals 12.5 volts. Thus, the reflective layer 14 in an IMOD device 10 in which the transparent layer comprises only SiO2 demonstrates no hysteresis. Therefore, if the reflective display is fabricated using IMOD devices 10, each comprising a transparent layer 12 having only SiO2, it would be impossible to select a value for Vbias. For example, if Vbias is selected to be 12.5 volts, because of variations within the IMOD devices 10 in the reflective display, for at least some of the IMOD devices 10, a Vbias of 12.5 volts would fail to keep the reflective layer 14 of those IMOD devices 10 in the driven condition.


In order to select a Vbias that is sufficient to keep the reflective layer 14 of a respective IMOD device 10 within a reflective display in its driven condition, it is necessary for each reflective layer 14 of a respective IMOD device 10 within the reflective display to demonstrate some degree of hysteresis, defined as a non-zero difference between the Vactuation and Vrelease.


It will be appreciated that the electromechanical response of the reflective layer 14 of each IMOD device 10 is determined by the electromechanical properties of the reflective layer 14 as well as the electrical properties of the transparent layer 12. In one particular IMOD device design, the transparent layer 12 comprises SiO2 which gives a desired optical response when the reflective layer 14 is brought into contact therewith. However, the transparent layer 12 comprising SiO2 has a certain electrical characteristic or property (the SiO2 traps negative charge) that affects the hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14. Thus, the transparent layer 12 has a desired optical response but an undesirable electromechanical response to a driving or actuation voltage which affects the hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14.


In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the electromechanical behavior of the transparent layer 12 is altered by adding a further layer to the thin film stack. This further layer at least minimizes or compensates for the effect of transparent layer 12 on the hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14.


In one embodiment of the invention, the further layer comprises Al2O2 which is deposited, in accordance with known deposition techniques, over the transparent layer 12. This results in a thin film stack 40 as shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings, comprising a substrate 42, an electrode 44, an SiO2 reflective layer 46 and an Al2O3 layer 48 which functions as a charge trapping layer.



FIG. 5 of the drawings shows a hysteresis curve 50 for an IMOD device 10 comprising the thin film stack 40. As with the hysteresis curve 30, the X-axis plots applied voltage in Volts, whereas the Y-axis plots optical response in Volts. The hysteresis curve 50 shows a hysteresis window of 2.8 volts defined as the difference between Vactuation (7.8 volts) and Vrelease (5.0 volts). When the individual IMOD's 10 within a reflective display each have a respective reflective layer 14 which demonstrates hysteresis in accordance with the hysteresis curve 50, it will be seen that it is possible to choose a value for the Vbias between 5 volts and 7.8 volts which will effectively perform the function of keeping the reflective layer 14 of each respective IMOD device 10 within the reflective display in its driven condition. In a further embodiment of the invention, the thin film stack may be further modified to include an Aha) layer above, as well as below, the reflective layer 12. This embodiment is shown in FIG. 6 of the drawings, where it will be seen that the thin film stack 60 includes a substrate 62, an electrode 64, a first Al2O3, layer 66, an SiO2 transparent layer 68 and a second Al2O3 layer 70.



FIG. 7 of the drawings shows a hysteresis curve 80 for a transparent layer 14 of an IMOD device 10 having the thin film stack 60 shown in FIG. 6 of the drawings. As will be seen, the hysteresis window is now wider. i.e., 4.5 volts, being the difference between Vactuation (9 volts) and Vrelease (4.5 volts).


However, other materials that have a high charge trapping density may be used. These materials include AlOx, which is the off-stoichiometric version of Al2O3, silicon nitride (Si3N4), its off-stoichiometric version (SiNx), and tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) and its off-stoichiometric version (TaOx). All of these materials have several orders of magnitude higher charge trapping densities than SiO2 and tend to trap charge of either polarity. Because these materials have a high charge trapping density, it is relatively easy to get charge into and out of these materials, as compared to SiO2, which has a low charge trapping density and has an affinity for trapping negative charge only.


Other examples of materials that have a high charge trapping density include the rare earth metal oxides (e.g., halfinium oxide), and polymeric materials. Further, semiconductor materials doped to trap either negative or positive charge may be used to form the further layer above, and optionally below the SiO2 transparent layer 12.


Thus far, a technique for manipulating the electromechanical behavior of a MEMS device has been described, wherein charge buildup within the MEMS device is controlled by the use of a charge trapping layer which has a high charge trapping density. However, it is to be understood that the invention covers the use of any charge trapping layer to alter or control the electromechanical behavior of a MEMS device regardless of the charge trapping density thereof. Naturally, the choice of a charge trapping layer whether it be of a high, low, or medium charge trapping density will be dictated by what electromechanical behavior for a MEMS device is being sought.


In some embodiments the incorporation of metals, in the form of thin layers or aggregates, provide yet another mechanism for manipulating the charge trapping density of a host film in a MEMS device. Structuring the host film by producing voids or creating a variation or periodicity in its material characteristics may also be used to alter the charge trapping characteristics.


According to another embodiment of the invention, an IMOD device 10 includes a chemical barrier layer deposited over the reflective layer 12 in order to protect the reflective layer 12 from damage or degradation due to exposure to chemical etchants in the micro fabrication process. For example, in one embodiment, the transparent layer 12 which comprises SiO2, is protected by an overlying layer comprising Al2O3, which acts as a chemical barrier to etchants, for example, XeF2. In such embodiments, it has been found that when the transparent SiO2 layer 12 is protected from the etchants, nonuniformities in the SiO2 are eliminated along with attendant nonuniformities in electromechanical behavior, thus causing the transparent layer 14 within each IMOD device 10 to display hysteresis.



FIGS. 8
a and 8b show another application within a MEMS device wherein a charged trapping layer is used to control the electromagnetic behavior of a structure within the MEMS device.


Referring to FIG. 8a, reference numeral 90 generally indicates a portion of an electrostatic fluid flow system. The electrostatic fluid flow system includes a substrate 92 within which is formed a generally U-shaped channel 94. The channel 94 includes an inner layer 96 of a first material which is selected, for example, because of its chemical and mechanical properties, for example, the material may be particularly wear-resistant, and may demonstrate little degradation due to the flow a fluid within the channel. The channel 94 also includes an outer layer 98 which is selected for its charge-trapping properties, as will be explained in greater detail below.


The electrostatic fluid flow system 90 also includes pairs of electrodes 100 and 102 which are selectively energized to cause displacement of charge particles within a fluid in the channel 94 in the direction indicated by the arrow 104 in FIG. 8b of the drawings. In one embodiment, the outer layer 98 traps charge in the fluid thereby to provide greater control of fluid flow within the system 101. In another embodiment, the layer 98 may trap charge in order to eliminate or to reduce hysteresis effects.


Referring now to FIG. 9 of the drawings, another application of using a charge-trapping layer to alter the electromechanical behavior of a structure within a MEMS device is shown. In FIG. 9, reference numeral 120 generally indicates a motor comprising a rotor 122 which is axially aligned and spaced from a stator of 124. As can be seen, the stator 124 is formed on a substrate 126 and includes electrodes 128, which, in use, are energized by a driving mechanism (not shown). The rotor 122 includes a cylindrical portion 130 which is fast with a spindle 132. The rotor 122 may be of a material that may be selected for its mechanical properties, including resistance to wear, but may have undesirable electrical properties in response to input, such as when the electrodes 128 are energized in order to cause rotation of the rotor 122. In order to compensate for these undesirable electrical properties, layers 134 and 136 are deposited on the rotor 122 in order to effectively act as a charge trapping layer to alter the electromechanical behavior of the rotor 122.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that the various modification and changes can be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than in a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus, comprising: a substrate;an electrode, wherein the electrode is located over the substrate;an additional layer located over the electrode, wherein the additional layer comprises SiO2,an etch barrier layer, wherein the etch barrier layer is located over the additional layer;an air gap, wherein the air gap is located adjacent the etch barrier layer; anda displaceable layer, wherein the displaceable layer is reflective to incident light.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the etch barrier layer is resistant to XeF2.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the etch barrier layer comprises Al2O3.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is an interferometric modulator.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the displaceable layer is electrostatically displaceable.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the displaceable layer is displaceable through the air gap.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the additional layer is substantially transparent.
  • 8. A method of making the apparatus of claim 1, comprising: forming an electrode layer over a substrate;forming an additional layer over the electrode layer, wherein the additional layer comprises SiO2;forming an etch barrier layer over the transparent layer; andexposing the etch barrier layer to a chemical etchant, wherein the etch barrier layer is resistant to the chemical etchant.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the etch barrier layer comprises Al2O3.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the chemical etchant comprises XeF2.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, additionally comprising forming a displaceable layer, wherein the displaceable layer is separated from the etch barrier layer by an air gap.
  • 12. The method of claim 8, wherein the apparatus is an interferometric modulator.
  • 13. The method of claim 8, wherein the additional layer is substantially transparent.
  • 14. An electromechanical device comprising: a substrate;an electrode, wherein the electrode is located on the substrate;an air gap;an additional layer, wherein the additional layer comprises SiO2, and wherein the additional layer is located between the electrode and the air gap; andan etch barrier layer comprising Al2O3, wherein the etch barrier layer is located between the air gap and the additional layer.
  • 15. The device of claim 14, further comprising an electrostatically displaceable layer located on the opposite side of the air gap from the electrode.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 14, additionally comprising a layer comprising Al2O3 located between the additional layer and the electrode.
  • 17. The device of claim 14, wherein the device is an interferometric modulator.
  • 18. The device of claim 14, wherein the etch barrier layer is located on or adjacent the additional layer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/251,196, filed Sep. 20, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,550,794, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (144)
Number Name Date Kind
4190488 Winters Feb 1980 A
4498953 Cook et al. Feb 1985 A
4500171 Penz et al. Feb 1985 A
4519676 te Velde May 1985 A
4560435 Brown et al. Dec 1985 A
4566935 Hornbeck Jan 1986 A
4710732 Hornbeck Dec 1987 A
4880493 Ashby et al. Nov 1989 A
4900395 Syverson et al. Feb 1990 A
4954789 Sampsell Sep 1990 A
4956619 Hornbeck Sep 1990 A
5083857 Hornbeck Jan 1992 A
5099353 Hornbeck Mar 1992 A
5124834 Cusano et al. Jun 1992 A
5190637 Guckel Mar 1993 A
5216537 Hornbeck Jun 1993 A
5231532 Magel et al. Jul 1993 A
5293272 Jannson et al. Mar 1994 A
5324683 Fitch et al. Jun 1994 A
5345328 Fritz et al. Sep 1994 A
5358806 Haraichi et al. Oct 1994 A
5381040 Sun et al. Jan 1995 A
5439763 Shimase et al. Aug 1995 A
5454906 Baker et al. Oct 1995 A
5583688 Hornbeck Dec 1996 A
5646768 Kaeriyama Jul 1997 A
5656554 Desai et al. Aug 1997 A
5683649 Chatterjee et al. Nov 1997 A
5719068 Suzawa et al. Feb 1998 A
5726480 Pister Mar 1998 A
5771321 Stern Jun 1998 A
5784212 Hornbeck Jul 1998 A
5801084 Beasom et al. Sep 1998 A
5822110 Dabbaj Oct 1998 A
5825528 Goossen Oct 1998 A
5835255 Miles Nov 1998 A
5967163 Pan et al. Oct 1999 A
5986796 Miles Nov 1999 A
6008123 Kook et al. Dec 1999 A
6031653 Wang Feb 2000 A
6040937 Miles Mar 2000 A
6046659 Loo et al. Apr 2000 A
6100477 Randall et al. Aug 2000 A
6162657 Schiele et al. Dec 2000 A
6165890 Kohl et al. Dec 2000 A
6195196 Kimura et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204080 Hwang Mar 2001 B1
6215221 Cabuz et al. Apr 2001 B1
6248654 Lee et al. Jun 2001 B1
6288472 Cabuz et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297072 Tilmans et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319824 Lee et al. Nov 2001 B1
6342452 Coronel et al. Jan 2002 B1
6356254 Kimura Mar 2002 B1
6359673 Stephenson Mar 2002 B1
6376787 Martin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377233 Colgan et al. Apr 2002 B2
6392233 Channin et al. May 2002 B1
6407851 Islam et al. Jun 2002 B1
6446486 deBoer et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447126 Hornbeck Sep 2002 B1
6448622 Franke et al. Sep 2002 B1
6452124 York et al. Sep 2002 B1
6452465 Brown et al. Sep 2002 B1
6465320 McNeil et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466354 Gudeman Oct 2002 B1
6513911 Ozaki et al. Feb 2003 B1
6567312 Torii May 2003 B1
6574033 Chui et al. Jun 2003 B1
6602791 Ouellet et al. Aug 2003 B2
6608268 Goldsmith Aug 2003 B1
6618187 Pilossof Sep 2003 B2
6620712 Huang et al. Sep 2003 B2
6635919 Melendez et al. Oct 2003 B1
6657832 Williams et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674090 Chua et al. Jan 2004 B1
6674562 Miles Jan 2004 B1
6689211 Wu et al. Feb 2004 B1
6713235 Ide et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720267 Chen et al. Apr 2004 B1
6741377 Miles May 2004 B2
6747800 Lin Jun 2004 B1
6756317 Sniegowski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6778306 Sniegowski et al. Aug 2004 B2
6782166 Grote et al. Aug 2004 B1
6791441 Pillans et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794119 Miles Sep 2004 B2
6806110 Lester et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812482 Fleming et al. Nov 2004 B2
6861277 Monroe et al. Mar 2005 B1
6867896 Miles Mar 2005 B2
6870654 Lin et al. Mar 2005 B2
6905613 Gutierrez et al. Jun 2005 B2
6940631 Ishikawa Sep 2005 B2
6951824 Fischer et al. Oct 2005 B2
6953702 Miller et al. Oct 2005 B2
6960305 Doan et al. Nov 2005 B2
7008812 Carley Mar 2006 B1
7041224 Patel et al. May 2006 B2
7049164 Bruner May 2006 B2
7110158 Miles Sep 2006 B2
7123216 Miles Oct 2006 B1
7550794 Miles et al. Jun 2009 B2
7781850 Miles et al. Aug 2010 B2
20010003487 Miles Jun 2001 A1
20020003400 Lee Jan 2002 A1
20020014579 Dunfield Feb 2002 A1
20020021485 Pilossof Feb 2002 A1
20020024711 Miles Feb 2002 A1
20020027636 Yamada Mar 2002 A1
20020054424 Miles May 2002 A1
20020055253 Rudhard May 2002 A1
20020070931 Ishikawa Jun 2002 A1
20020086455 Franosch et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020110948 Huang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020117728 Brosnihhan et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020125822 Graff et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020135857 Fitzpatrick et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020195681 Melendez et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003682 Moll et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030003761 Yang et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030006468 Ma et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030029831 Kawase Feb 2003 A1
20030047533 Reid et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030071015 Chinn et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072070 Miles Apr 2003 A1
20030111439 Fetter et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030138986 Bruner Jul 2003 A1
20030202264 Weber et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030202265 Reboa et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040028849 Stark et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040035821 Doan et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038513 Kohl et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040051929 Sampsell et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040053434 Bruner Mar 2004 A1
20040080832 Singh Apr 2004 A1
20040124073 Pilans et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040136076 Tayebati Jul 2004 A1
20040217264 Wood et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040244191 Orr et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050045276 Patel et al. Mar 2005 A1
20080026328 Miles Jan 2008 A1
20080130089 Miles Jun 2008 A1
20100320555 Miles et al. Dec 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
1378245 Nov 2002 CN
199 38 072 Mar 2000 DE
0 035 299 Sep 1983 EP
0 695 959 Feb 1996 EP
0 788 005 Aug 1997 EP
1 209 738 May 2002 EP
1 452 481 Sep 2004 EP
49-004993 Jan 1974 JP
01-102415 Apr 1989 JP
5-49238 Feb 1993 JP
05275401 Oct 1993 JP
06-350105 Dec 1994 JP
07-098326 Apr 1995 JP
07-060844 Jul 1995 JP
09-33942 Jul 1997 JP
10-020328 Jan 1998 JP
10-148644 Jun 1998 JP
10-209176 Aug 1998 JP
11-258777 Sep 1999 JP
2000-28938 Jan 2000 JP
2001-085519 Mar 2001 JP
2002-287047 Mar 2001 JP
2001-272613 Oct 2001 JP
2002-124534 Apr 2002 JP
2002-207182 Jul 2002 JP
2002-243937 Aug 2002 JP
2002-328313 Nov 2002 JP
2003-001598 Jan 2003 JP
2003-136499 May 2003 JP
2003-315732 Nov 2003 JP
2003-340795 Dec 2003 JP
2004-106074 Apr 2004 JP
590983 Jun 2004 TW
593124 Jun 2004 TW
WO 9105284 Apr 1991 WO
WO 9210925 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9530924 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9829748 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9952006 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0114248 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0163657 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0224570 Mar 2002 WO
WO 2005085932 Sep 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (41)
Entry
Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2010 in Chinese App. No. 200580032155.2.
Aratani et al., “Process and Design Considerations for Surface Micromachined Beams for a Tuneable Interferometer Array in Silicon,” Proc. IEEE Microelectromechanical Workshop, Fort Lauderdale, FL, pp. 230-235 (Feb. 1993).
Aratani K. et al. “Surface Micromachined Tuneable Interferometer Array,” Sensors and Actuators A, Elsevier Sequoia S.A., Lausanne, CH, vol. A43, No. 1/3, May 1, 1994, pp. 17-23.
Ibbotson et al., “Comparison of XeF2 and F-atom reactions with Si and SiO2,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 1129-1131 (Jun. 1984).
Raley et al., “A Fabry-Perot Microinterferometer for Visible Wavelengths,” IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, SC, pp. 170-173 (1992).
Sridharan et al. “Post-packaging Release a New Concept for Surface-Micromachined Devices” Technical Digest, IEEE Solid-State Sensor & Actuator Workshop, New York, NY US Nov. 8, 1998 pp. 225-228.
Williams, et al. Etch Rates for Micromachining Processing. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 256-259, (Dec. 1996).
Winters, et al. The etching of silicon with XeF2 vapor. Applied Physics Letters, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 70-73, (Jan. 1979).
ISR and WO for PCT/US05/030902 Dated Jan. 26, 2006.
IPRP for PCT/US05/030902 dated Apr. 5, 2007.
Examiner's Report dated Feb. 26, 2008 in Australian App. No. 2003275194.
Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7.
Office Action dated May 9, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7.
Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7.
Official Action received Oct. 5, 2007 in Russian App. No. 2005111765.
Official Action received May 26, 2008 in Russian App. No. 2005111765.
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 200580032155.2.
Yao et al., BrF3 dry release technology for large freestanding parylene microstructures and electrostatic actuators, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 97-98, pp. 771-775, Apr. 2002.
Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
Office Action dated May 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196.
ISR for PCT/US03/30016 dated Apr. 27, 2004.
Decision of Final Rejection dated Nov. 28, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7.
Official Action dated May 13, 2009 in Russian App. No. 2005111765.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Jul. 28, 2009 in Japanese App. No. 2004-538461.
Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 19, 2010 in App. No. 03759463.7.
Boucinha et al., 2000, Amorphous silicon air-gap resonators on large-area substrates, Applied Physics Letters, 77(6):907-909.
Rusu et al., 2001, Planarization of deep trenches, Proc. SPIE, 4557:49-57.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Aug. 10, 2010 in Japanese App. No. 2004-538461.
Notice of Grounds for Rejection dated Jul. 27, 2010 in Korean App. No. 2005-7004794.
Examiner's Report dated Mar. 13, 2012 in Canadian patent application No. 2,499,208.
Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,778.
Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,778.
Office action dated Sep. 27, 2011 in Taiwanese App. No. 094131698.
Notice of the Final Rejection dated Feb. 25, 2011 in Korean App. No. 2005-7004794.
Notice of Grounds for Rejection dated May 23, 2011 in Korean App. No. 2011-7009971.
Office Action dated May 16, 2011 in Canadian App. No. 2,581,670.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090323168 A1 Dec 2009 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10251196 Sep 2002 US
Child 12489250 US