This invention relates to microelectromechanical systems devices. In particular it relates to thin film structures in microelectromechanical systems devices and to electromechanical and optical responses of such thin film structures.
Today a wide variety of micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices may be fabricated using microfabrication techniques. Examples of these MEMS devices include motors, pumps, valves, switches, sensors, pixels, etc.
Often these MEMS devices harness principles and phenomena from different domains such as the optical, electrical and mechanical domains. Such principles and phenomena, while seemingly difficult to harness in the macroscopic world, can become extremely useful in the microscopic world of MEMS devices, where such phenomena become magnified. For example, electrostatic forces which are generally considered to be too weak in the macroscopic world to be harnessed, are strong enough in the microscopic world of MEMS devices to activate these devices, often at high speeds and with low power consumption.
Materials used in MEMS devices are generally selected based on their inherent properties in the optical, electrical, and mechanical domains and the characteristic response to input, such as for example, a driving or actuation voltage.
One problem affecting the fabrication of MEMS devices is that in some cases, a material having a highly desirable response to input, for example an optical response to incident light, may also have an undesirable response to input, for example, an electromechanical response to an actuation or driving voltage. To overcome, or at least reduce, the undesirable response, new materials have to be found or developed often at great expense.
Another problem with the fabrication of MEMS devices is that sometimes, a material selected for its characteristic response may become damaged due to exposure to chemical agents used during a particular micro fabrication process. This causes the material to demonstrate less of the characteristic response to the input.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a method for fabricating a microelectromechanical systems device. The method comprises fabricating a first layer comprising a film or structured film having a characteristic electromechanical response, and a characteristic optical response, wherein the characteristic optical response is desirable and the characteristic electromechanical response is undesirable; and modifying the characteristic electromechanical response of the first layer by manipulating charge build up thereon during activation of the micro electromechanical systems device.
a shows a block diagram of an electrostatic fluid flow system within a MEMS device in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
b shows a schematic drawing of the fluid flow system of
A particular structure or layer within a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device may be desirable for its optical response to input in the form of incident light, but may at the same time have an undesirable electromechanical response to input in the form of an actuation or driving voltage. The present invention discloses techniques to manipulate or control the electromechanical response of the structure or layer, thus at least reducing the undesirable electromechanical response.
As an illustrative, but a non-limiting example of a MEMS device, consider the interference modulator (IMOD) device 10 shown in
The IMOD device 10 includes a transparent layer 12 and a reflective layer 14 which is spaced from the transparent layer 12 by an air gap 16. The transparent layer 14 is supported on posts 18 and is electrostatically displaceable towards the transparent layer 12 thereby to close the air gap 16. An electrode 20 which is connected to a driving mechanism 22 is used to cause the electrostatic displacement of reflective layer 14.
Typically, a plurality of IMOD devices 10 are fabricated in a large array so as to form pixels within a reflective display. Within such a reflective display, each IMOD device 10 essentially defines a pixel which has a characteristic optical response when in the undriven state, and a characteristic optical response when in the driven state. The transparent layer 12 and the size of the air gap 16 maybe selected so that an IMOD within the reflective display may reflect red, blue, or green light when in the undriven state and may absorb light when in the driven state.
It will be appreciated that during operation of the reflective display, the IMOD devices 10 are rapidly energized, and de-energized in order to convey information. When energized, the reflective layer 14 of an IMOD 10 device is electrostatically driven towards the transparent layer 12, and when the IMOD 10 is de-energized, the reflective layer 14 is allowed to return to its undriven state. In order to keep the reflective layer 14 in its driven condition, a bias voltage is applied to each IMOD device 10.
If an actuation voltage, Vactuation, defined as a voltage required to electrostatically drive the reflective layer 14 of an IMOD device to its driven condition, as showed in
Referring to
In order to select a Vbias that is sufficient to keep the reflective layer 14 of a respective IMOD device 10 within a reflective display in its driven condition, it is necessary for each reflective layer 14 of a respective IMOD device 10 within the reflective display to demonstrate some degree of hysteresis, defined as a non-zero difference between the Vactuation and Vrelease.
It will be appreciated that the electromechanical response of the reflective layer 14 of each IMOD device 10 is determined by the electromechanical properties of the reflective layer 14 as well as the electrical properties of the transparent layer 12. In one particular IMOD device design, the transparent layer 12 comprises SiO2 which gives a desired optical response when the reflective layer 14 is brought into contact therewith. However, the transparent layer 12 comprising SiO2 has a certain electrical characteristic or property (the SiO2 traps negative charge) that affects the hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14. Thus, the transparent layer 12 has a desired optical response but an undesirable electromechanical response to a driving or actuation voltage which affects the hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the electromechanical behavior of the transparent layer 12 is altered by adding a further layer to the thin film stack. This further layer at least minimizes or compensates for the effect of transparent layer 12 on the hysteresis behavior of the reflective layer 14.
In one embodiment of the invention, the further layer comprises Al2O2 which is deposited, in accordance with known deposition techniques, over the transparent layer 12. This results in a thin film stack 40 as shown in
However, other materials that have a high charge trapping density may be used. These materials include AlOx, which is the off-stoichiometric version of Al2O3, silicon nitride (Si3N4), its off-stoichiometric version (SiNx), and tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) and its off-stoichiometric version (TaOx). All of these materials have several orders of magnitude higher charge trapping densities than SiO2 and tend to trap charge of either polarity. Because these materials have a high charge trapping density, it is relatively easy to get charge into and out of these materials, as compared to SiO2, which has a low charge trapping density and has an affinity for trapping negative charge only.
Other examples of materials that have a high charge trapping density include the rare earth metal oxides (e.g., halfinium oxide), and polymeric materials. Further, semiconductor materials doped to trap either negative or positive charge may be used to form the further layer above, and optionally below the SiO2 transparent layer 12.
Thus far, a technique for manipulating the electromechanical behavior of a MEMS device has been described, wherein charge buildup within the MEMS device is controlled by the use of a charge trapping layer which has a high charge trapping density. However, it is to be understood that the invention covers the use of any charge trapping layer to alter or control the electromechanical behavior of a MEMS device regardless of the charge trapping density thereof. Naturally, the choice of a charge trapping layer whether it be of a high, low, or medium charge trapping density will be dictated by what electromechanical behavior for a MEMS device is being sought.
In some embodiments the incorporation of metals, in the form of thin layers or aggregates, provide yet another mechanism for manipulating the charge trapping density of a host film in a MEMS device. Structuring the host film by producing voids or creating a variation or periodicity in its material characteristics may also be used to alter the charge trapping characteristics.
According to another embodiment of the invention, an IMOD device 10 includes a chemical barrier layer deposited over the reflective layer 12 in order to protect the reflective layer 12 from damage or degradation due to exposure to chemical etchants in the micro fabrication process. For example, in one embodiment, the transparent layer 12 which comprises SiO2, is protected by an overlying layer comprising Al2O3, which acts as a chemical barrier to etchants, for example, XeF2. In such embodiments, it has been found that when the transparent SiO2 layer 12 is protected from the etchants, nonuniformities in the SiO2 are eliminated along with attendant nonuniformities in electromechanical behavior, thus causing the transparent layer 14 within each IMOD device 10 to display hysteresis.
a and 8b show another application within a MEMS device wherein a charged trapping layer is used to control the electromagnetic behavior of a structure within the MEMS device.
Referring to
The electrostatic fluid flow system 90 also includes pairs of electrodes 100 and 102 which are selectively energized to cause displacement of charge particles within a fluid in the channel 94 in the direction indicated by the arrow 104 in
Referring now to
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that the various modification and changes can be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than in a restrictive sense.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/251,196, filed Sep. 20, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,550,794, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4190488 | Winters | Feb 1980 | A |
4498953 | Cook et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4500171 | Penz et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4519676 | te Velde | May 1985 | A |
4560435 | Brown et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4566935 | Hornbeck | Jan 1986 | A |
4710732 | Hornbeck | Dec 1987 | A |
4880493 | Ashby et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4900395 | Syverson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4954789 | Sampsell | Sep 1990 | A |
4956619 | Hornbeck | Sep 1990 | A |
5083857 | Hornbeck | Jan 1992 | A |
5099353 | Hornbeck | Mar 1992 | A |
5124834 | Cusano et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5190637 | Guckel | Mar 1993 | A |
5216537 | Hornbeck | Jun 1993 | A |
5231532 | Magel et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5293272 | Jannson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5324683 | Fitch et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5345328 | Fritz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358806 | Haraichi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5381040 | Sun et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5439763 | Shimase et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454906 | Baker et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5583688 | Hornbeck | Dec 1996 | A |
5646768 | Kaeriyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5656554 | Desai et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683649 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5719068 | Suzawa et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726480 | Pister | Mar 1998 | A |
5771321 | Stern | Jun 1998 | A |
5784212 | Hornbeck | Jul 1998 | A |
5801084 | Beasom et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822110 | Dabbaj | Oct 1998 | A |
5825528 | Goossen | Oct 1998 | A |
5835255 | Miles | Nov 1998 | A |
5967163 | Pan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986796 | Miles | Nov 1999 | A |
6008123 | Kook et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031653 | Wang | Feb 2000 | A |
6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
6046659 | Loo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6100477 | Randall et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6162657 | Schiele et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165890 | Kohl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195196 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204080 | Hwang | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215221 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248654 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6288472 | Cabuz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319824 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342452 | Coronel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356254 | Kimura | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359673 | Stephenson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376787 | Martin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377233 | Colgan et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6392233 | Channin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407851 | Islam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6446486 | deBoer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447126 | Hornbeck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448622 | Franke et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452124 | York et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452465 | Brown et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465320 | McNeil et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466354 | Gudeman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6513911 | Ozaki et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567312 | Torii | May 2003 | B1 |
6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602791 | Ouellet et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608268 | Goldsmith | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618187 | Pilossof | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620712 | Huang et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635919 | Melendez et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657832 | Williams et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674090 | Chua et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689211 | Wu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6713235 | Ide et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720267 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741377 | Miles | May 2004 | B2 |
6747800 | Lin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6756317 | Sniegowski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778306 | Sniegowski et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782166 | Grote et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791441 | Pillans et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806110 | Lester et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812482 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6861277 | Monroe et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870654 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6905613 | Gutierrez et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6940631 | Ishikawa | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951824 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6953702 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960305 | Doan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7008812 | Carley | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7041224 | Patel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049164 | Bruner | May 2006 | B2 |
7110158 | Miles | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7550794 | Miles et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7781850 | Miles et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010003487 | Miles | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020003400 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014579 | Dunfield | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021485 | Pilossof | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024711 | Miles | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027636 | Yamada | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020054424 | Miles | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055253 | Rudhard | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070931 | Ishikawa | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086455 | Franosch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110948 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117728 | Brosnihhan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125822 | Graff et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135857 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020195681 | Melendez et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003682 | Moll et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030003761 | Yang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006468 | Ma et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029831 | Kawase | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047533 | Reid et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071015 | Chinn et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072070 | Miles | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030111439 | Fetter et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138986 | Bruner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030202264 | Weber et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202265 | Reboa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040028849 | Stark et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035821 | Doan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038513 | Kohl et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040051929 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053434 | Bruner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080832 | Singh | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124073 | Pilans et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136076 | Tayebati | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040217264 | Wood et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244191 | Orr et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050045276 | Patel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20080026328 | Miles | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080130089 | Miles | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100320555 | Miles et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1378245 | Nov 2002 | CN |
199 38 072 | Mar 2000 | DE |
0 035 299 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 695 959 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 788 005 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1 209 738 | May 2002 | EP |
1 452 481 | Sep 2004 | EP |
49-004993 | Jan 1974 | JP |
01-102415 | Apr 1989 | JP |
5-49238 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05275401 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06-350105 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07-098326 | Apr 1995 | JP |
07-060844 | Jul 1995 | JP |
09-33942 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10-020328 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-148644 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-209176 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-258777 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-28938 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2001-085519 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002-287047 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-272613 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-124534 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-207182 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-243937 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-328313 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-001598 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-136499 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-315732 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003-340795 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2004-106074 | Apr 2004 | JP |
590983 | Jun 2004 | TW |
593124 | Jun 2004 | TW |
WO 9105284 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9210925 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9530924 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9829748 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9952006 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0114248 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0163657 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0224570 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2005085932 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2010 in Chinese App. No. 200580032155.2. |
Aratani et al., “Process and Design Considerations for Surface Micromachined Beams for a Tuneable Interferometer Array in Silicon,” Proc. IEEE Microelectromechanical Workshop, Fort Lauderdale, FL, pp. 230-235 (Feb. 1993). |
Aratani K. et al. “Surface Micromachined Tuneable Interferometer Array,” Sensors and Actuators A, Elsevier Sequoia S.A., Lausanne, CH, vol. A43, No. 1/3, May 1, 1994, pp. 17-23. |
Ibbotson et al., “Comparison of XeF2 and F-atom reactions with Si and SiO2,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 1129-1131 (Jun. 1984). |
Raley et al., “A Fabry-Perot Microinterferometer for Visible Wavelengths,” IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, SC, pp. 170-173 (1992). |
Sridharan et al. “Post-packaging Release a New Concept for Surface-Micromachined Devices” Technical Digest, IEEE Solid-State Sensor & Actuator Workshop, New York, NY US Nov. 8, 1998 pp. 225-228. |
Williams, et al. Etch Rates for Micromachining Processing. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 256-259, (Dec. 1996). |
Winters, et al. The etching of silicon with XeF2 vapor. Applied Physics Letters, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 70-73, (Jan. 1979). |
ISR and WO for PCT/US05/030902 Dated Jan. 26, 2006. |
IPRP for PCT/US05/030902 dated Apr. 5, 2007. |
Examiner's Report dated Feb. 26, 2008 in Australian App. No. 2003275194. |
Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7. |
Office Action dated May 9, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7. |
Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7. |
Official Action received Oct. 5, 2007 in Russian App. No. 2005111765. |
Official Action received May 26, 2008 in Russian App. No. 2005111765. |
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 200580032155.2. |
Yao et al., BrF3 dry release technology for large freestanding parylene microstructures and electrostatic actuators, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 97-98, pp. 771-775, Apr. 2002. |
Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
Office Action dated May 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/251,196. |
ISR for PCT/US03/30016 dated Apr. 27, 2004. |
Decision of Final Rejection dated Nov. 28, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 03821986.7. |
Official Action dated May 13, 2009 in Russian App. No. 2005111765. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Jul. 28, 2009 in Japanese App. No. 2004-538461. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 19, 2010 in App. No. 03759463.7. |
Boucinha et al., 2000, Amorphous silicon air-gap resonators on large-area substrates, Applied Physics Letters, 77(6):907-909. |
Rusu et al., 2001, Planarization of deep trenches, Proc. SPIE, 4557:49-57. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Aug. 10, 2010 in Japanese App. No. 2004-538461. |
Notice of Grounds for Rejection dated Jul. 27, 2010 in Korean App. No. 2005-7004794. |
Examiner's Report dated Mar. 13, 2012 in Canadian patent application No. 2,499,208. |
Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,778. |
Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,778. |
Office action dated Sep. 27, 2011 in Taiwanese App. No. 094131698. |
Notice of the Final Rejection dated Feb. 25, 2011 in Korean App. No. 2005-7004794. |
Notice of Grounds for Rejection dated May 23, 2011 in Korean App. No. 2011-7009971. |
Office Action dated May 16, 2011 in Canadian App. No. 2,581,670. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090323168 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10251196 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 12489250 | US |