Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of exercise equipment devices and, more specifically, to the subfield of weight-training exercise equipment devices that provide simulative kinesthetic feedback to the user.
This section provides background information related to the present disclosure, which is not necessarily prior art.
Exercise equipment devices are well established in modern industry and are designed to be used during physical exercise activity to enhance said exercise in various desirable ways, such as enhancing the effectiveness or efficiency of strength, aerobic, anaerobic, or conditioning training. One subset of commonly available exercise equipment devices is those which enhance “strength-training” such that the devices enhance the strength or conditioning of certain muscles or muscle groups of the user's body. Various well-known means exist by which such strength-training exercise enhancements are achieved. For example, certain strength-training exercise equipment devices provide a resistive element to an exercise, such that the movement being made by the user is opposed, thereby making such movement more difficult to accomplish. As another example, certain other exercise equipment devices within the strength-training category are comprised of weight elements, such that the movement being made by the user is opposed against the force of gravity as the weight elements are lifted by the user. Yet other strength-training exercise equipment devices employ a combination of such resistive and weight elements to achieve the desired exercise enhancement.
In order to achieve the desired strength-training results for a given user, it is commonly necessary to make adjustments to the resistive or weight elements of the employed exercise equipment device, such that said exercise equipment device is properly “set up” for that particular user's desired workout routine. The adjustments required for a desired workout routine can be laborious and time-consuming, and may require the addition or removal of weights to or from the exercise equipment device, the tightening or loosening of various mechanisms within the exercise equipment device, or even the rearrangement of certain sub-mechanisms of the exercise equipment device, such as pins, keys, or latches. Furthermore, the user must have a means of remembering the desired set of adjustments to make for a given workout routine. Depending on the user's desired routine, many such adjustments may need to be made during a given workout session, such that the exercise equipment device is properly set up for each individual unique exercise movement, or “exercise set”, within the user's complete workout session. Additionally, a typical workout session requires performing a variety of exercises, each of which being carried out on a different piece of strength-training equipment, often with multiple exercise sets carried out per exercise. This reality not only requires the user to remember or record the equipment setting for each exercise, but often leads to time delays and frustration on the part of the user as equipment is often taken by a different user between exercise sets forcing the user to “wait their turn”.
In the specific case of weight lifting, one category of commonly utilized exercise equipment devices is known as “free weights” or “free weight systems” or “functional strength training systems”. Free weights can, in certain embodiments take the form of a simple barbell, which is typically a long metal bar to which disks or “plates” of varying weights can be attached at both ends. The barbell is designed, typically, to be grasped by a user with both hands, and then lifted from a lower position to a higher position, thereby employing the downward force of gravity to oppose the upward force being applied by the user.
Free weight systems are a preferred type of exercise equipment devices among many users, because they, unlike many other types of strength-training exercise equipment devices which constrain the user's motion along a certain path of motion, provide minimal constraint against any possible direction of motion made by the user. This lack of constraint requires the user to stabilize the weight by employing proper flexibility and form and by activating additional muscles and muscle groups not required from the resistance of a typical path-constrained machine. Also because of this lack of constraint, however, free-weight systems have a comparably higher degree of danger in their use because their movement, if not correctly controlled by the user, can be erratic and unpredictable. This erratic and unpredictable movement, such as undesired dropping or undesired directional movement, can easily cause injury to the user, injury to others located nearby, or physical damage to items or structures in the surrounding physical space. To alleviate some of this additional danger inherent in the use of free-weight systems, users often elect to utilize a helper, or “spotter”, to help facilitate their exercise routine and be on-the-ready to aid in taking control of the movement of the free-weight system if its movement does become uncontrolled.
Because free-weight systems are, by their nature, comprised of various weights, certain heavy free-weight systems require specialized surroundings, such as lifting rack frame structures or “power racks”, a large open surround area and a reinforced floor structure, to support the weight of the systems, as well as to endure impacts from uncontrolled or unintentional motion of the free-weights. Additionally, space and racking is needed for the multiple sets of plates required for each free-weight station.
One example of a barbell-style weightlifting apparatus that does not require a conventional spotter is disclosed in PCT application WO2005030341A1 (Blackwell). As disclosed, the apparatus is a conventional free weight rack system, with physical weights, but with servo-controlled spotting arms.
Another example of an exercise apparatus providing simulated free weight exercises is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,725,459 (Rexach). This reference discloses a stacked weight-based barbell device using real weight plates and a mechanically-adjustable cable system.
Since the advent of electricity, and later, computerized control mechanisms, various motorized and computerized exercise devices also became known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,934,694 (McIntosh) discloses a computer-controlled exercise system which applies constant torque to motors to provide resistance against the user's motion. Another example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,437 (Ruis, et al.) teaches a robotic exercise machine with motorized linkage systems. A third example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,577,981 (Jarvik) teaches a virtual reality exercise system integrated to the orientation of a user's head. Finally, a fourth example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,280,361 (Harvey, et al.) discloses a cable-based computerized system that provides resistive force against the user's path of motion.
More recent exercise device inventions teach mechanisms or methods for providing varying resistance against a user's motion using computer-controlled means. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,155 (Bird) teaches a DC motor system with variable input resistance to the motor in order to vary the motor's torque force and thereby resist a user's movement in a pre-programmed mode. Another example, U.S. Pat. No. 10,661,112 (Orady et al.) teaches a pancake style motor and cable-based design to implement a counterforce using a frequency-controlled AC motor. Finally, a third example, U.S. Pat. Application No. 2014/0315689 (Vauquelin, et al.) discloses an approach to simulating the interaction with a mass allowing the user to set load and artificial inertia parameters independently of one another.
There is thus a need in the art for an exercise system and method that simulates free weight exercise movements such that the primary degrees of freedom of a traditional free weight barbell are present; eliminates the requirement of lifting actual physical barbell weights against the force of gravity; eliminates the need for a spotter or elaborate impact-resistant structures; reduces or eliminates the need for a time-consuming mechanical setup procedure for individual users; and accommodates pre-programmed exercise modes, including but not limited to the simulation of a free-weight exercise system in Earth's gravity environment, based on any combination of preprogrammed or user-selectable variables.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
The invention herein describes an electromechanical exercise machine that, in its basic form, imparts a force or forces to one or both ends of a lifting bar in order to simulate various resistances including, but not limited to, simulating the inertia and weight of a loaded traditional barbell in the Earth's gravity field. The invention also allows a user to move said lifting bar in the primary degrees of freedom of a traditional barbell free-weight system, and wherein such degrees of freedom are further described herein.
The invention alleviates typical safety issues caused by the possibility of uncontrolled user motion that is present in traditional barbell free-weight systems by: 1) using a stage system hereinafter further defined to control the force and position of the barbell, 2) utilizing sensors to measure the user's interaction with the barbell, and 3) applying algorithms to enact safety measures. For example, algorithms in certain exemplary embodiments of the invention provide a grip-sensing control mechanism, herein referred to as a “grip sensor”, such that if the user of the invention releases the barbell, the simulated gravitational field weight of the simulated mass can be reduced such that no harm comes to the user, hardware or surrounding environment including other people nearby.
Because of the fact that the mass of a traditional weighted barbell is simulated in the invention, rather than being an actual mass, a reinforced flooring structure to support the invention's weight, which is commonly needed in traditional weighted barbell systems, is not necessary. Even the barbell itself can be any desired simulated weight and not constrained to, for example, the standard 45-pound base weight found in most traditional commercially-available weighted barbells. In certain embodiments, the weight of the barbell accessory itself can be mitigated via “counterweighting” it using the stage actuation, effectively making the barbell weightless if such weightlessness is deemed desirable by the user. This benefit of certain embodiments can be useful for users incapable of lifting a standard 45-pound barbell. Additionally, as compared to traditional weighted barbell systems, the invention eliminates the noise and floor damage from weights being dropped that is generally present in traditional weighted barbell systems; and the invention further removes the need for weight storage space.
In exemplary embodiments of the invention, the invention comprises one or more commercially-available processors and controllers, which together enable the invention to provide a desired physical behavior based on a programmed input algorithm. As used herein, a processor is a commercially-available device that is capable of accepting data from a broad range of sensors and similar input devices, and then performs calculations based on a desired algorithm. Based on the results of said calculations, said processor then outputs instructions to one or more controllers. A controller, as used herein, is a lower-level, commercially-available dedicated device, that has a purpose to do one or more physical tasks, such as a task to move a motor. Controllers often also comprise a small built-in processor to enable it to do a task with closed-loop feedback to ensure the task is completed. As should be evident to those skilled in the art, processors and controllers can be separate entities or the controller functionality can be a capability within a commercially available processor or the controller can be a distributed system integrated between the processor and various motor or driver mechanisms.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the invention further comprises a human-machine interface, or “HMI”, such as a commercially-available touchscreen, and wherein said HMI allows a user to interact with the invention and adjust certain parameters to achieve desired behaviors of the simulated mass. In certain exemplary embodiments of the HMI, remote interaction with the machine is enabled through an online access account using a software application, or “app”, via a computer, smart phone, computerized pad, or other similar device. In certain exemplary embodiments, a display may be utilized for communicating video, images, or software information to the user. In certain exemplary embodiments, the HMI may also act as said display.
In certain exemplary embodiments of the invention, individual user data is electronically stored within the invention such that it can be recalled by a user as desired. Such stored data comprises, but is not limited to, biomechanics information, exercise routines, weight levels achieved, and schedule of exercise.
The structural design of certain preferred embodiments of the invention is based on a lifting bar (hereinafter “simulated barbell” or “barbell accessory”) removably connected on each end to a “stage”, and wherein said stage is a physical way or rail mechanism to constrain motion, along with a driver mechanism to enable, as desired, any one or more of the controlled motion, controlled positioning, and controlled force of a payload carriage within the constrained region of motion. In the specific embodiment case of a planar stage, the motion of the payload carriage is constrained to a planar surface.
In certain exemplary embodiments, only one stage is present. In certain exemplary embodiments, the one or more stages are hingedly affixed to a wall or other structure to allow for the one or more stages to be collapsed into a compact configuration for storage when the invention is not in use.
The motion of a payload carriage within the constrained region of motion of such a stage can be enabled via many well-known mechanical mechanisms, including but not limited to standard ballscrew/leadscrew mechanisms, rack-and-pinion systems, pneumatic devices, hydraulic devices, cable-driven mechanisms, belt-driven technologies, electromagnetic linear motors, or other commercially available solutions for such applications which should be evident to those skilled in the art.
For purposes of clarity of explanation of certain preferred embodiments of the invention comprising a planar stage, the constrained region of motion of a such a planar stage within the invention can be described as an X-Y plane, wherein the X-direction is defined as being parallel to the floor upon which the invention is located and thereby generally perpendicular to the Earth's gravity vector, and the Y-direction is defined as being generally parallel to the Earth's gravity vector. In certain preferred embodiments, the invention comprises two such X-Y planar stages, with the X-Y plane of each of the two stages being located parallel to the other, and an aforementioned simulated barbell being securably affixed at each end to one of the X-Y planar stages via a flexure, ball/socket, linkage mechanism or similar attachment apparatus, hereinafter referred to as the “accessory union”.
In exemplary embodiments, said accessory unions allow for up to five degrees of freedom of motion of the simulated barbell, taken from the perspective of the user. Specifically, four of the degrees of freedom can be defined as vertical (along the aforedefined Y-direction), horizontal (along the aforedefined X-direction), yaw (rotation about the axis of the aforedefined Y-direction) and roll (rotation about the axis of the aforedefined X-direction). The simulated barbell may also be allowed to freely rotate about its own axis, providing for a 5th degree of freedom. Passive or actuated motion and force along the simulated barbell's axis (hereinafter termed the Z-direction or pitch axis) may also be incorporated in exemplary embodiments, and in certain embodiments can be enabled via a passive spring-loaded, self-centering mechanism, providing the potential for a 6th degree of freedom.
In certain embodiments incorporating a simulated barbell and two parallel planar stages, the two accessory unions of the invention are enabled to each accept one end of the simulated barbell, and wherein the simulated barbell is broadly designed to emulate the physical structure of any one or more various traditional barbells, such as those presently well-known and commercially-available in the exercise industry as a standard barbell, an Olympic barbell, a trap/hex barbell, a safety squat bar, a Swiss bar, an EZ curl bar, a super curl bar, an axle bar, or a 360 grip curl bar.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the invention provides flexibility of incorporating additional specialized accessories in place of the simulated barbell, in order to simulate other standard gym exercises such as cable pulls, dumbbells, rowing machine, kettle bell, and battle ropes. In additional exemplary embodiments for certain specialized accessories, the invention may be embodied with only one planar stage and one accessory union.
In certain exemplary embodiments, each simulated barbell or other specialized accessory may incorporate its own sensor and/or actuation elements to further enhance the invention's simulation and safety mechanism capabilities. For example, the simulated barbell may itself comprise grip sensors as a means to determine whether the user has released the simulated barbell during an exercise, so that controlled safety measures can be applied such as reducing or eliminating the applied exercise load to prevent user injury.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention as described herein provides wide flexibility in operation and an ability to enact generalized stand-alone control schemes or fully generalized multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) “finite state machines” composed of several control schemes or modes, including transition programming as the machine switches between modes. As an example of a stand-alone control scheme, the invention may be programmed to simply simulate a mass in a gravity field by applying a constant force in the downward (Y) direction. As an example of a finite state machine, the invention in certain embodiments may again be programmed to simulate a mass in a gravity field, however when the user releases the simulated barbell, instead of allowing the motor to drive the simulated barbell rapidly to the floor, the algorithm of the invention can utilize input data from a velocity sensor to switch to a “safe mode” once the velocity reaches a predetermined critical speed, subsequently stopping or slowing the simulated barbell before it hits the floor or causes injury to the user.
As a specific embodiment example, the invention can be viewed as a finite state machine when embodied for purposes of illustration as physically comprising two planar stages positioned parallel to each other, with each of the two planar stages with coordinate systems defined as (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) respectively. Then, the force output of any direction of the machine (x1, y1, x2, y2) can be stated as: {right arrow over (F)}out=fn({right arrow over (P)}, {right arrow over (V)}, {right arrow over (A)}, {right arrow over (F)}, {right arrow over (S)}), where:
Similar generalized relations can also be written for the finite state machine's output positions and output velocities.
A schematic of one embodiment of a generalized control layout is shown in
Furthermore, while two types of interface to the controller/processor are shown for software updates and/or general programming, only one may be employed; while two types of interface to the controller/processor are shown, the interface may rather connect via the HMI; while encoders are shown located on the motors, they may be rather located on the linear rails; while no velocity sensor is shown, those skilled in the art will recognize that the position encoder signal can simply be differentiated to estimate velocity; while no velocity sensor is shown, this omission doesn't preclude the use of a separate velocity sensor; while the accelerometer sensors are shown in proximity to the simulated barbell, this doesn't preclude acceleration being measured or inferred non-locally by other means, e.g. differentiation of the velocity signals to estimate accelerations; while the force sensors are shown in proximity to the simulated barbell, this doesn't preclude force being measured or inferred non-locally by other means. For example, the motor torques can be utilized to infer the linear output forces, or a pressure sensing pad can be employed for the user to stand on; while the user data is shown as a data storage block as either fixed or removable media, it could also be stored in the memory of the controller/processor or accessed via the cloud interface or transmitted via a wireless device such as a smart phone, smart watch, or similar; and while the brakes/clutches are shown as attached to or in proximity to the motors, they could also be located directly on the linear rails.
Below, several embodiments of the control schemes are discussed. These example embodiments can be viewed as simplified embodiments of the generalized control layout shown in
To enable an embodiment of the invention wherein the embodiment simulates a standard free-weight in gravity and inertial system,
When all of the forces are summed, the following equation of motion results:
Fu=mg+mÿ.
Hence, the user experiences a force that is a combination of a constant force (weight) due to gravity and a dynamic force proportional to how quickly the user can accelerate the mass. Note that while the constant force is always in the negative (downward) direction, the acceleration can be either positive or negative. A typical Olympic weight lifter will use this dynamic to their advantage by maximizing the acceleration of the mass during the upward lift of the barbell, and because the barbell will have to decelerate before it can begin its descent, the weight lifter has time to re-position their body beneath the barbell as in the case of an Olympic “snatch” or their upper body beneath the barbell as in the case of an Olympic “clean”.
Implementing this physical system as a simulated weight using a motor (or actuator), accelerometer, and control system is straightforward for one skilled in the art, as per an embodiment shown in
The control system shows a signal representing the fixed weight, mg, summed with a feedback signal from the accelerometer multiplied by a gain representing the mass, m. The summed signal is fed through a transfer function which is derived to command the motor to produce the required simulated force to the user, Fu. For example, this transfer function might simply consist of a scaling gain or might consist of a voltage-to-current transformation to control the motor's torque. When considered in relation to the general control layout of
For simulating a resistive force that is linearly proportional to displacement of the barbell or accessory, a classic linear spring model can be employed. The model of this type of system embodiment is shown in
The equation governing the reactive force is simply, Fu=kx, and the control system implementation of that equation is shown in
Unlike
The simulation of a linear spring can be used to mimic elastic band types of exercises where the user experiences more resistance the further the barbell or accessory deviates from an origin position. Note that while this example embodiment describes the simulation of a linear spring, there is no limitation of such linearity. Specifically, the spring value, k, can be non-linear, or it can be embodied as a function of other finite state machine variables.
For simulating a resistive force that is linearly proportional to velocity of the barbell or accessory, a classic linear damper model can be employed. An exemplary model of this system is shown in
The equation governing the reactive force is simply, Fu=c{dot over (x)}.
The control system implementation for this equation is shown in
on the encoder (position) signal from the motor to calculate a velocity and then applies a gain of c to produce the desired resistive force.
The simulation of a linear damper can be used to mimic types of exercises where the user experiences more resistance proportional to the speed of device motion. Examples include activities involving motion through a viscous medium such as rowing or equipment that acts as an energy drain due to rubbing or internal friction such as battle ropes.
To provide more clarity of a preferred embodiment of the invention's control system and the transitioning between multiple finite state machine “modes”,
The comparison is made using a standard overhead barbell press (otherwise known in the exercise industry as a military press) where the standard barbell is lifted at shoulder height from a rack and then lifted or “pressed” to full extension of the arms above the head and then lowered back to the shoulder position thereby completing a full repetition or “rep” as shown in
It should now be evident that removing the detachable simulated barbell accessory of the invention when it is embodied in a two parallel planar stage form will provide a user with two planar stages capable of accepting various accessory attachments that can simulate a variety of industry-standard exercise or therapy equipment devices. Three such accessories are described herein—a cable pull accessory, an abs/back accessory, and a rowing machine accessory.
An embodiment configuration of the invention to simulate cable pulls is easily enabled. After the simulated barbell accessory is removed, a cable-pulley system is attached to each side of the invention with the stages being used as the load producing elements. In embodiments with two parallel planar stages, both stages of the embodiment can be fitted with this accessory. Alternatively, only one stage can be utilized with a single-sided cable pull accessory.
An embodiment configuration of the invention to simulate a combination abdominal and back, herein referred to as “abs/back”, exercise device is easily enabled. The simulated barbell accessory is fitted with a pad mounted concentric to the bar or alternatively, the barbell accessory is removed and replaced with the abs/back accessory bar. Additionally, a standard, commercially available exercise bench is employed on which the user sits. The generalized programmable functionality of the invention can then be employed to restrict the motion of the accessory to a specific arc-shaped path similar to that experienced in a standard abs/back exercise machine. Finally, the invention imparts a force to the user's motion along said arc-shaped path to provide the simulated resistance necessary for either the abs or back exercise.
An embodiment for a rowing machine mimics the structure of a typical commercially available rowing machine, wherein this accessory embodiment consists of a sitting platform capable of sliding forward and backward on a passive rail system. However, unlike typical rowing machines each simulated “oar” would be affixed to its respective planar stage through a pivot mechanism similar to that used on a rowing boat. Each stage can impart a generalized force to the end of the simulated oar (the end of the oar in the water) and can also sense the simulated oars' positions. These capabilities allow for simulating a viscous resisting force proportional to velocity when the oar is in the downward (in the water) position and a less resistive force when the oar is in the upward (in the air) position. Additionally, the oars of the rowing accessory could incorporate a rotational sensor to determine if the orientation of the oars are “square” or “feathered” and thereby simulate the proper amount of water/air resistance and forward propulsion. Finally, although the embodiments shown simulates “sculling” (a rower having two oars), it could just as easily be designed to simulate “sweep-oar rowing” (a rower engaging only one oar as part of a rowing team). Further embodiment accessories should be evident to a person skilled in the exercise industry.
Because the invention provides for fully programmable generalized force and position profiles, applicability beyond a piece of gym equipment should be obvious to those versed in the art. Relevant applications of the invention further comprise physical therapy, occupational therapy, sports science, and physiology research. As such, exemplary embodiments of the invention described herein are a generalized exercise, rehabilitation and research platform for which third-party developers can develop both software “apps” and hardware accessories to provide further functionality and benefits to the user. Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
In the drawings:
Example embodiments will be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings are provided to show illustrative examples of certain preferred embodiments of the invention.
Referring now to
Referring now to prior art as depicted in
Referring now to
Referring now to prior art as depicted in
Referring now to
Referring now to prior art as depicted in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
For more clarity,
For more clarity,
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The foregoing description of the embodiments, along with the provided drawings, has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the invention, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
The present application is the US national stage under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2020/056402 which was filed on 20 Oct. 2020, and which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/925,221, filed 23 Oct. 2019, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/056402 | 10/20/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/080930 | 4/29/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3524644 | Kane | Aug 1970 | A |
3635472 | Marcyan | Jan 1972 | A |
4252314 | Ceppo | Feb 1981 | A |
4527797 | Slade, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4934693 | Santoro | Jun 1990 | A |
5050868 | Pearson | Sep 1991 | A |
5215510 | Baran | Jun 1993 | A |
5468203 | Okonkwo | Nov 1995 | A |
5669859 | Liggett | Sep 1997 | A |
5688216 | Mauriello | Nov 1997 | A |
5944633 | Wittrock | Aug 1999 | A |
7374516 | Lundquist | May 2008 | B2 |
7549950 | Lundquist | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7666124 | Vaes | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7815555 | Webber | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8047972 | Dean | Nov 2011 | B1 |
D650022 | Lundquist | Dec 2011 | S |
8328698 | Webber | Dec 2012 | B1 |
9067102 | Poppinga | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9381393 | Gonzalez | Jul 2016 | B1 |
10245461 | Bruni | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10864400 | Schween | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10864401 | Schween | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11110313 | Gore | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11389690 | Valdez | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11565144 | Habing | Jan 2023 | B2 |
D980354 | Gong | Mar 2023 | S |
11712593 | Kilby | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11813493 | Sjöblom | Nov 2023 | B2 |
11833386 | Esco | Dec 2023 | B2 |
20020098953 | Scheewe | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030027695 | Lee | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030134722 | Greenland | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20120190503 | Shavit et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130072353 | Alessandri et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130237374 | Ashby | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140256517 | Poppinga | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140315689 | Vauquelin | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150141200 | Murray | May 2015 | A1 |
20180311524 | Butler | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20200188719 | Brand | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20220233908 | Neuhaus | Jul 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2019100117 | May 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for corresponding PCT/US2020/056402, mailed Jan. 21, 2021. |
Written Opinion for corresponding PCT/US2020/056402, mailed Jan. 21, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220401790 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62925221 | Oct 2019 | US |