The embodiments herein generally relate to high power microwave technologies, and more particularly to nonlinear transmission line modulated beam drivers used for high power microwave devices.
In applications involving generation of high power microwaves using energetic electron beams, it is often advantageous to generate a modulated electron beam directly from the cathode of the device. For properly designed microwave devices, injection of a modulated beam allows for much faster startup of radio frequency (RF) oscillations when compared to the slower process of allowing a device to slowly develop modulations on a uniform beam through amplification of noise or a comparatively smaller injected RF wave. As described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,766,541 and 9,685,296, the complete disclosures of which, in their entireties, are herein incorporated by reference, one advantageous way to generate a modulated electron beam directly from the cathode of an electron beam generating device is through the application of a nonlinear transmission line (NLTL) beam modulator.
While NLTL-modulated beam drivers have been demonstrated in a number of configurations, these configurations all share a defining property: they are forward wave devices. This means that within the NLTL, the injected electromagnetic drive pulse travels the same direction through the line as the generated RF oscillatory wave.
The illustrations provided in
The shock front 3, which is formed at the leading edge of the input current pulse 4, propagates down the length of the NLTL at velocity us and RF oscillations 5 are generated. The shock velocity, us, represents the fastest possible propagation speed down the unsaturated NLTL. The RF propagations speed (i.e., group velocity) will typically be slower by some differential velocity value Δuf. This means that the propagation speed of the RF wave is us−Δuf. As the RF oscillations travel at a slightly slower speed than the shock, they fall behind as additional oscillations are continuously generated by the shock, as shown in
With reference to
In view of the foregoing, an embodiment herein provides an apparatus for performing electron beam modulation, the apparatus comprising an input pulser to provide an electromagnetic pulse; a radio frequency (RF) filter to filter the electromagnetic pulse by isolating the input pulser from high frequency electromagnetics; a NLTL to receive the electromagnetic pulse, and generate a backward wave RF oscillation of a predetermined frequency to travel in a direction opposite that of the electromagnetic pulse; and an electron beam generating device comprising an anode and a cathode, the electron beam generating device to receive a combined electromagnetic pulse from the RF filter and the backward wave RF oscillation from the NLTL to cause excitation of a modulated voltage between the anode and cathode, and to cause the electron beam generating device to emit an electron beam that is modulated at the predetermined frequency of the backward wave RF oscillation. The NLTL may comprise any of a capacitor, inductor, and resistor, one or more of which have a nonlinear electromagnetic response. Any of the anode and the cathode may receive the combined electromagnetic pulse and the backward wave RF oscillation. The RF filter may block the backward wave RF oscillation from interacting with a portion of the input pulser. The input pulser may contain the RF filter. Any of the anode and cathode may emit the modulated electron beam. The apparatus may comprise a termination component to ground the electromagnetic pulse transmitted from the NLTL.
Another embodiment comprises a system comprising an input pulser to generate an electromagnetic pulse to travel in a first direction; a filter to control the electromagnetic pulse; a NLTL to interact with the electromagnetic pulse to form a shock front, and generate a backward wave RF oscillation to travel in a second direction opposite that of the first direction; a termination component to ground the electromagnetic pulse transmitted from the NLTL; and a device to receive the electromagnetic pulse from the filter and the backward wave RF oscillation from the NLTL. The device may comprise an electron beam generating device to emit an electron beam that is modulated at a frequency of the backward wave RF oscillation. The electron beam generating device may comprise an anode and a cathode. A polarity of the electromagnetic pulse may determine whether the electromagnetic pulse enters the electron beam generating device through either the anode or cathode. The device may comprise an antenna. The system may comprise a high pass filter between the NLTL and the antenna. The termination component may comprise any of a metal oxide varistor and a Zener diode, or an electromagnetically equivalent component, in series with a termination load of the NLTL. The metal oxide varistor or electromagnetically equivalent component may be set to conduct at a voltage level of approximately a peak value of the input pulser.
Another embodiment provides a method comprising directing an electromagnetic pulse to travel in a first direction; interacting the electromagnetic pulse with a NLTL to create a shock front; generating a backward microwave oscillation of a predetermined frequency to travel in a second direction opposite that of the first direction of the electromagnetic pulse; and combining the electromagnetic pulse and the backward microwave oscillation from the NLTL. The method may comprise transmitting the electromagnetic pulse from the NLTL; and grounding the electromagnetic pulse transmitted from the NLTL. The method may comprise emitting an electron beam from the combined electromagnetic pulse and the backward microwave oscillation. The method may comprise modulating the electron beam at the predetermined frequency of the backward microwave oscillation. The method may comprise driving current to an antenna with the backward microwave oscillation. The method may comprise setting an amplitude of the electromagnetic pulse to be consistent.
These and other aspects of the embodiments herein will be better appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the following descriptions, while indicating preferred embodiments and numerous specific details thereof, are given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the embodiments herein without departing from the spirit thereof, and the embodiments herein include all such modifications.
The embodiments herein will be better understood from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, in which:
Embodiments of the disclosed invention, its various features and the advantageous details thereof, are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques are omitted to not unnecessarily obscure what is being disclosed. Examples may be provided and when so provided are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of the ways in which the invention may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice its various embodiments. Accordingly, examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of what is disclosed and otherwise claimed.
In the drawings, the size and relative sizes of layers and regions may be exaggerated for clarity. The embodiments herein provide an input pulser that provides an electromagnetic pulse via an RF filter to a junction between a NLTL and an electron beam generating device. The NLTL forms a shock front when interacting with the electromagnetic pulse, which generates RF oscillations in a backward wave configuration. The backward wave RF oscillations are combined with the electromagnetic pulse and input into the electron beam generating device, which emits a modulated electron beam. The RF filter prevents the backward wave RF oscillations from interfering with the input pulser. The end of the NLTL is connected to a termination component, which grounds the electromagnetic pulses coming out of the NLTL. In another example, an antenna replaces the electron beam generating device. A backward wave NLTL beam modulator, wherein the RF oscillatory wave travels in the opposite direction as the injected electromagnetic drive pulse, offers a number of advantages over the forward wave devices. For example, for a given NLTL line length and frequency, a NLTL operating in a backward wave configuration will generate a substantially longer RF pulse than it will in a forward wave configuration, allowing for a relatively smaller system. Also, a backward wave device provides for greater consistency in RF oscillation amplitude compared to most forward wave devices. This enhanced uniformity in RF oscillation amplitude allows for greater uniformity of generated electron beam modulations. Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
As shown in the block diagram of
As shown in
As depicted by paths 39a, 39b in
As indicated by path 39c, RF oscillations 30 generated within the NLTL 25 travel in a direction 35 opposite that of the direction 34 of the input electromagnetic pulse 20, and exit the NLTL via connection 41. These RF oscillations 30 then travel through junction 33 where they are blocked from entering the input pulser 15 by the RF filter 23 and, instead, travel to the input connection (e.g., at cathode 50) of the electron beam generating device 40. The RF filter 23 serves to prevent the RF oscillations 30 from interacting with portions of the input pulser 15 in which these RF oscillations 30 may cause unwanted effects but allows passage of the electromagnetic pulse 20 generated by input pulser 15. The RF filter 23 may represent a component as simple as a single inductor or may represent a more complex circuit which serves the required functionality. It is noted that while the RF filter 23 is represented as a component separate from the input pulser 15, it may, in some configurations, be a component internal to the input pulser 15, according to an example.
The electromagnetic pulse 20 from the input pulser 15 and the RF oscillatory wave (e.g., RF oscillation 30) from the NLTL 25 are combined at the input (e.g., at the cathode 50) of the electron beam generating device 40 where they excite a modulated voltage between the anode 45 and cathode 50 of the device 40. This modulated voltage causes the cathode 50 to emit an electron beam 55 which is modulated at the frequency of the RF oscillations 30 generated by the NLTL 25.
Generally, in order to generate microwave oscillations from the electromagnetic pulse 20, the NLTL 25 utilizes nonlinear material interactions that forms a portion of the electromagnetic pulse 20 (usually the leading edge) into an electromagnetic shock and maintains this shock as it travels down the NLTL 25. The shock then interacts with the dispersive structure of the NLTL 25 to generate a series of microwave frequency oscillations (e.g., RF oscillation 30) that are superposed on the portion of the electromagnetic pulse 20 that is trailing the shock. The formation and sustainment of this electromagnetic shock utilizes a specific type of nonlinearity (i.e., not all nonlinear materials are nonlinear in the right way to be useful in the NLTL 25). Accordingly, the nonlinear materials in the NLTL 25 set up a condition in the NLTL 25 in which the propagation velocity through the NLTL 25 is a function of signal amplitude. Additionally, this nonlinear effect is extremely broadband; in other words, this nonlinear effect occurs from DC or near-DC up to at least the frequency of the intended microwave output of the NLTL 25. These materials are also selected to be as low-loss as possible as lossy transmission line materials will substantially reduce microwave power output from the NLTL 25.
If the NLTL 25 utilizes bulk nonlinear dielectrics, this nonlinearity takes the form of a material with a permittivity that is a function of electric field (or voltage). Examples of this type of material are the ferroelectric ceramics, wherein the permittivity of the material decreases as the applied electric field (or voltage) increases. This change in permittivity is achieved by a distortion of the crystal lattice of the ceramic when it is immersed in a background electric field. Because propagation velocity through a given medium increases as permittivity decreases (assuming a constant permeability), for a Gaussian-like electromagnetic pulse 20 injected into the NLTL 25, the peak of the electromagnetic pulse 20 will travel faster than the low voltage leading foot of the pulse which will results in a steepening of the leading edge of the electromagnetic pulse 20 until a shock is formed. In a nonlinear dielectric NLTL 25 using lumped element semiconductor elements, such as varactors or reverse-biased Schottky diodes, the nonlinear capacitive elements have a lower capacitance at higher voltages than they do at lower voltages due to changes in the size of the depletion region within the semiconductor junction. A reduction in capacitance results in a lower effective transmission line permittivity, and thus, a higher propagation velocity for higher amplitude electromagnetic pulses 20.
In ferrite-based lines, the magnetic permeability of the line decreases with current amplitude due to realignment of the magnetic domains within the material until such point as the ferrite is saturated. Because propagation velocity along the NLTL 25 increases as permeability decreases, the higher amplitude portions of the input electromagnetic pulse 20 travel faster than the low amplitude portions, so the electromagnetic pulse 20 steepens and eventually forms an electromagnetic shock. As before, this shock, formed by the nonlinear amplitude-dependent propagation velocity properties of the NLTL 25, interacts with the dispersive structure of the NLTL 25 to generate microwave frequency oscillations superposed on the trailing portions of the electromagnetic pulse 20.
The NLTL 25a depicted in
The nonlinear magnetic NLTLs 25a-25c may include additional circuitry or hardware to bias the nonlinear magnetic elements, which are usually ferrites. This biasing circuitry or hardware may take the form of a magnetic field coil (not shown) that immerses the entire NLTL 25a-25c in a magnetic field. In an example, the biasing circuitry may be configured such that a DC current can be run through the nonlinear magnetic elements via connections to a set of circuit nodes, such as nodes 21, 22, as shown in NLTL 25c. The magnetic field generated by the coil or by the flowing current will allow the initial alignment of the magnetic domains of the nonlinear magnetic elements (ferrites) to be changed, which allows the propagation velocity of the electromagnetic shock to be controlled by a limited degree.
It can be shown that for a linear transmission line of the type shown in
where ω=2πf, k=2π/λ, ωLC=(CLsat)−0.5, f is the frequency, Δ is the wavelength, and d is the physical length of one period of the NLTL 25d. C and Lsat are the capacitance and saturated inductance of elements 60d, 63, respectively, of each stage in region 68.
A plot of ω as a function of the phase shift per period, kd, is provided in
The propagation velocity of the electromagnetic shock front, us, is related to a number of parameters, including material and geometric properties of the ferrites and transmission line, the shock current (e.g., the current associated with the electromagnetic shock) Is, and the saturation state of the ferrites. For the purposes of plotting the shock propagation velocity on the dispersion plot in
For the purposes of the present example, two different shock velocities, us1 and us2, where us1>us2, represented by lines 82, 83, respectively, are plotted. As described previously, the shock velocity is related to the saturation state of the ferrites (which can be altered by employing one of the aforementioned biasing methods). Thus, us1 and us2, could represent shock propagation velocities in a given NLTL under two different biasing levels. Energy couples from the shock front into RF waves having phase velocities (i.e., phase velocity, uphase is equal to ω/k) matching the shock velocity (also called synchronous waves). These synchronism conditions are represented on the dispersion plot by intersections of the shock propagation velocity line and curve 81.
As shown in
which is plotted as curve 84 in
The illustrations provided in
In
As shown in
The techniques provided by the embodiments herein convert common available power from sources such as AC power from a wall plug or DC power from batteries, into RF power either through a modulated electron beam 55 in a vacuum electronics device or directly out of an antenna 80. The backward wave NLTL 25 confers advantages in pulse length and stability compared to forward wave devices, thereby advancing the state of the art.
The input pulser 15 (or pulse generator) is the first stage in the aforementioned conversion of power. The input pulser 15 can range from commercially available scientific equipment to custom one-of-a-kind devices, but for the purposes of the embodiments herein, the input pulser 15 is configured to convert power from the available power source into a form that is used by the NLTL 25.
The NLTL 25 utilizes a high voltage, high current pulse which it partially converts into RF energy. The NLTL 25 utilizes a relatively high voltage pulse to function, as the nonlinear components react differently to high voltage compared to low voltage. According to the embodiments herein, the production of the backward wave RF oscillation 30 using a backward wave interaction offers an improvement over the conventional solutions. This interaction produces the RF oscillation 30 that travels in the opposite direction (e.g., second direction 35) of the incident voltage electromagnetic pulse 20. The generated RF oscillation 30 has a longer duration when compared to an RF pulse created by a forward wave interaction. The input electromagnetic pulse 20 into the NLTL 25 must be dealt with in some way when it reaches the end of the NLTL 25. There are drawbacks to open and short terminations, thus in one example, the system 100 provided by the embodiments herein utilizes a metal oxide varistor 90 to be the desired termination, which is unique compared to the conventional solutions.
In addition, since this is a backward wave interaction, the RF oscillation 30 is returned down the input line back toward the input pulser 15. Typically, an input pulser 15 is not configured to handle return current, thus the filter 23 is included. The filter 23 directs the RF oscillation (e.g., pulse) 30 to the cathode 50 instead of back into the input pulser 15. From there, the cathode 50 converts the RF oscillation 30 into a bunched electron beam 55, or the RF oscillation 30 is filtered again through the high pass filter 85 and sent directly to the antenna 80. In whichever manner, the electrons are emitted (e.g., high field, heat, etc.), and they are accelerated by the difference in potential between the cathode 50 and anode 45. Since this potential changes with time due to the RF oscillation 30, the velocity of the electrons that are emitted also changes with time, leading to the bunched electron beam 55.
An additional implementation of the backwards wave NLTL 25 with the termination component 65 is the direct driving of the antenna 80 with the generated RF oscillation 30. In this alternate implementation, the electrical arrangement of the antenna 80 relative to the NLTL 25 facilitates backwards wave RF extraction, while the termination component 65 prevents excessive reflections and increases efficiency.
The additional implementation of the backwards wave NLTL with metal oxide varistor (MOV)-like end termination providing directly driving the antenna 80 with the generated RF oscillations 30 is depicted in
In applications, such as priming a high power microwave source, it may be desirable to maintain electron emission from the cathode 50 of the electron beam generating device 40 for a period of time longer than the time taken for the electromagnetic shock front 70 to transit the entire length of the NLTL 25. For these types of applications, a termination component 65 that limits reflections back into the NLTL 25, but reduces or eliminates parasitic current flow is desirable. The termination component 65 including a circuit element (or combination of elements) such as the metal oxide varistor (MOV) 90, as depicted in
The MOV 90 may be a solid state component having properties generally described by curve 93 on the current versus voltage plot provided in
For a series arrangement of MOVs, the threshold voltage of the series is equivalent to the sum of the threshold voltages 94 of each MOV 90 comprising the series. In this manner, very high voltage thresholds may be achieved to match the output voltages of high voltage pulsers. If large current handling requirements are expected, parallel MOV elements may be added to ensure any one MOV 90 does not pass excessive current. Thus, a given MOV 90 may include more than one MOV in some series and/or parallel arrangement.
MOVs are typically utilized in surge suppressor applications wherein they are placed in a shunt configuration across a load. If a potentially damaging voltage surge is incident on the load and shunt MOV, the MOV will rapidly transition to a conductive state and provide a low impedance path for the surge current to flow along a parallel path to ground, thus mitigating potential damage to the load.
In accordance with the embodiments herein, the MOV 90 or MOV-like element (e.g., Zener diode 92) is placed in series with the NLTL termination load 95. The threshold voltage 94 of the MOV 90 is preferentially chosen to be at or near the flat top (or peak) voltage of the input pulser 15. When the shock front 70 transits the NLTL 25 and encounters the MOV 90 in its initially high impedance state, the voltage at the input terminal 96 (shown in
Backward wave NLTLs are typically indicated to be terminated with either fixed impedance resistive elements or by a frequency-dependent impedance load intended to match the transmission line impedance at all frequencies (including DC). This type of NLTL termination can be utilized with the backward wave NLTL beam modulator 140, as shown by the schematic depicted in
The plot in
As shown in
The bunched electron beam 55 has its main utility in producing RF. In high power vacuum tubes for RF production, the electron beam 55 interacts with the circuit of the apparatus 10 or system 100 and generates RF. In some cases, the bunching is achieved through electric fields provided by an external source (not shown). In other implementations, the electron beam 55 itself becomes unstable and breaks into bunches. The method 150 provides an additional way, whereby electrons are bunched directly during electron emission. One aspect of the method 150 is that initial bunching occurs in both velocity and current, which is unique to this class of device. In the alternate arrangement, the backward wave NLTL 25 with the termination component 65 may be used for an increased-efficiency RF driver for the antenna 80. The embodiments herein may be utilized in various application such as, for example, electron beam modulator devices, high power microwave tubes, priming devices, modulated x-ray beams, and directed energy applications.
The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States for all government purposes without the payment of any royalty.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6239637 | Williamson | May 2001 | B1 |
6396338 | Huang | May 2002 | B1 |
7170444 | Seddon et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7532083 | Hannah | May 2009 | B2 |
7573157 | Clark | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7612629 | Pepper | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8766541 | Hoff et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
9685296 | Hoff | Jun 2017 | B1 |
20010011930 | Kintis | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20070159760 | Clark | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080254759 | Kintis | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20150326257 | Xi | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Hoff, B., et al., “Simulations of a Disk-on-Rod TWT Driven by an NLTL-Modulated Electron Beam,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 44, No. 8, Aug. 2016, pp. 1265-1269. |
French, D., et al., “Nonlinear transmission line based electron beam driver,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 83, Dec. 19, 2012, pp. 123302-1 through 123302-4. |
Bragg, J., et al., “Material selection considerations for coaxial, ferrimagnetic-based nonlinear transmission lines,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, Feb. 12, 2013, pp. 064904-1 through 064904-4. |
Johnson, J., et al., “Characteristics of a four element gyromagnetic nonlinear transmission line array high power microwave source,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 87, May 4, 2016, pp. 054704-1 through 054704-7. |
French, D., et al., “Dielectric Nonlinear Transmission Line,” 2011 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference (PPC), Jun. 19-23, 2011, Chicago, Illinois, Published by IEEE, 5 pages. |
Branch, G., “Shock Waves in Transmission Lines with Nonlinear Dielectrics,” IEE Colloquium on Pulsed Power '933, Feb. 17, 1993, London, United Kingdom, 3 pages. |
Ikezi, H., et al., “High-power soliton generation at microwave frequencies,” J. Appl. Phys. vol. 64, No. 6, Sep. 15, 1988, pp. 3277-2181. |
Neto, L., et al., “Characterization of Ceramic Dielectrics for Sub-GHz Applications in Nonlinear Transmission Lines,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 42, No. 10, Oct. 2014, pp. 3274-3282. |
Neto, L., et al., “High-Power RF Generation From Nonlinear Transmission Lines With Barium Titanate Ceramic Capacitors,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 44, No. 12, Dec. 2016, pp. 3424-3431. |
Gevorgian, S., et al., “Tuneable Film Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonators, Engineering Materials and Processes: Chapter 2—Dielectric, Mechanical, and Electromechanical Properties of Ferroelectrics and Piezoelectrics,” Springer-Verlag, London, United Kingdom, 2013, pp. 17-54. |
Afshari, E., et al., “Nonlinear Transmission Lines for Pulse Shaping in Silicon,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 2005, pp. 744-752. |
Coleman, P., et al., “Characterization of a Synchronous Wave Nonlinear Transmission Line,” 2011 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference (PPC), Jun. 19-23, 2011, Chicago, Illinois, 5 pages. |
Johnson, J., et al., “Material selection of a ferrimagnetic loaded coaxial delay line for phasing gyromagnetic nonlinear transmission lines,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 86, Aug. 5, 2015, pp. 084702-1 through 084702-5. |
French, D., et al., “Spatially Dispersive Ferrite Nonlinear Transmission Line With Axial Bias,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 42, No. 10, Oct. 2014, pp. 3387-3390. |
Belyantsev, A., et al., “Generation of RF Oscillations in the Interaction of an Electromagnetic Shock with a Synchronous Backward Wave,” Technical Physics, vol. 45, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. 747-752. |
Belyantsev, A., et al., “RF Oscillation Generated by an Electromagnetic Shock Wave in Coupled Transmission Lines with Anomalous and Normal Dispersion,” Technical Physics, vol. 46, No. 7, Jul. 2001, pp. 864-867. |
Seddon, N., et al., “Observation of the Inverse Doppler Effect,” Science, vol. 302, Nov. 28, 2003, pp. 1537-1540. |
Zola, J., “Simple Model of Metal Oxide Varistor for Pspice Simulation,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 23, No. 10, Oct. 2004, pp. 1491-1494. |
Golden, F., “A New Component—The Metal Oxide Varistor Suppressor,” 1972 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, May 22-23, 1972, Atlantic City, New Jersey, pp. 134-139. |
Matsushima, T., et al., “Equivalent Circuit Model with Nonlinear Characteristics of Zener Diode Extracted from SPICE Model for ESD Simulation,” 2017 11th International Workshop on the Electromagnetic Compatibility of Integrated Circuits (EMCCompo), Jul. 4-8, 2017, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 152-155. |