Electronic battery tester with battery age input

Abstract

An electronic battery tester for testing a storage battery, includes connections configured to couple to terminals of the battery. Measurement circuitry is coupled to the connections and configured to measure a parameter of the battery. An input is configured to receive a battery age input variable. Computation circuitry is configured to provide a test output related to a condition of the battery based upon the measured parameter and the battery age input variable.

Description

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to measuring the condition of storage batteries. More specifically, the present invention relates to electronic battery testers which measure a dynamic parameter of storage batteries.

Electronic battery testers are known in the art and used to test storage batteries. Various examples of such testers and other related technology are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,873,911, issued Mar. 25, 1975, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,708, issued Sep. 30, 1975, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,768, issued Mar. 28, 1989, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,170, issued Apr. 25, 1989, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 4,881,038, issued Nov. 14, 1989, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416, issued Mar. 27, 1990, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,269, issued Aug. 18, 1992, to Champlin; U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,380, issued Aug. 30, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,136, issued Nov. 5, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,574,355, issued Nov. 12, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,416, issued Dec. 10, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,585,728, issued Dec. 17, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,757, issued Dec. 31, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,093, issued Jan. 7, 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 5,598,098, issued Jan. 28, 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 5,656,920, issued Aug. 12, 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,192, issued May 26, 1998; U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,756, issued Oct. 13, 1998; U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,435, issued Nov. 3, 1998; U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,858, issued Feb. 16, 1999; U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,605, issued Jun. 22, 1999; U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,829, issued Aug. 31, 1999; U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,238, issued Dec. 14, 1999; U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,751, issued Mar. 14, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,777, issued Mar. 14, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,976, issued Apr. 18, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,081,098, issued Jun. 27, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,091,245, issued Jul. 18, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,104,167, issued Aug. 15, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,137,269, issued Oct. 24, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,163,156, issued Dec. 19, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,483, issued Jan. 9, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,505, issued Jan. 9, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,369, issued Apr. 24, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,225,808, issued May 1, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,249,124, issued Jun. 19, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,259,254, issued Jul. 10, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,563, issued Jul. 17, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,896, issued Sep. 25, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,897, issued Sep. 25, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,304,087, issued Oct. 16, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,310,481, issued Oct. 30, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,313,607, issued Nov. 6, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,313,608, issued Nov. 6, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,914, issued Nov. 13, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,650, issued Nov. 27, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,793, issued Dec. 11, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,762, issued Dec. 18, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,332,113, issued Dec. 18, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 6,351,102, issued Feb. 26, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,359,441, issued Mar. 19, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,363,303, issued Mar. 26, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,377,031, issued Apr. 23, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,392,414, issued May 21, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,669, issued Jul. 9, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,158, issued Jul. 23, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,441,585, issued Aug. 17, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,437,957, issued Aug. 20, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,158, issued Sep. 3, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,456,045; U.S. Pat. No. 6,466,025, issued Oct. 15, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,908, issued Oct. 15, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,466,026, issued Oct. 15, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,469,511, issued Nov. 22, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,990, issued Dec. 17, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,497,209, issued Dec. 24, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,507,196, issued Jan. 14, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,993; issued Mar. 18, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,078, issued Apr. 8, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,019, issued Apr. 29, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,566,883, issued May 20, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,941, issued Jul. 1, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,150, issued Jul. 22, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,621,272, issued Sep. 16, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,623,314, issued Sep. 23, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,633,165, issued Oct. 14, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,635,974, issued Oct. 21, 2003; U.S. Pat. No. 6,707,303, issued Mar. 16, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,737,831, issued May 18, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,744,149, issued Jun. 1, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,759,849, issued Jul. 6, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,781,382, issued Aug. 24, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,788,025, filed Sep. 7, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,795,782, issued Sep. 21, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,805,090, filed Oct. 19, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,806,716, filed Oct. 19, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 6,850,037, filed Feb. 1, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,850,037, issued Feb. 1, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,871,151, issued Mar. 22, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,885,195, issued Apr. 26, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,888,468, issued May 3, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,891,378, issued May 10, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,906,522, issued Jun. 14, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,906,523, issued Jun. 14, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,909,287, issued Jun. 21, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,914,413, issued Jul. 5, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,913,483, issued Jul. 5, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,485, issued Aug. 16, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,933,727, issued Aug. 23, 200; U.S. Pat. No. 6,941,234, filed Sep. 6, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,967,484, issued Nov. 22, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,998,847, issued Feb. 14, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,410, issued Feb. 21, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,411, issued Feb. 21, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,433, issued Mar. 14, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,015,674, issued Mar. 21, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,541, issued Apr. 25, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,039,533, issued May 2, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,058,525, issued Jun. 6, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,755, issued Jul. 25, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,106,070, issued Sep. 12, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,116,109, issued Oct. 3, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,119,686, issued Oct. 10, 2006; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,126,341, issued Oct. 24, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,276, issued Dec. 26, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 7,198,510, issued Apr. 3, 2007; U.S. Pat. No. 7,363,175, issued Apr. 22, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,208,914, issued Apr. 24, 2007; U.S. Pat. No. 7,246,015, issued Jul. 17, 2007; U.S. Pat. No. 7,295,936, issued Nov. 13, 2007; U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,304, issued Jan. 15, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,363,175, issued Apr. 22, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,398,176, issued Jul. 8, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,408,358, issued Aug. 5, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,833, issued Sep. 16, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,446,536, issued Nov. 4, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,763, issued Jan. 20, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,498,767, issued Mar. 3, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,501,795, issued Mar. 10, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,856, issued Mar. 17, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,545,146, issued Jun. 9, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,586, issued Jul. 7, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,595,643, issued Sep. 29, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,699, issued Oct. 6, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,744, issued Oct. 6, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,743, issued Oct. 6, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,619,417, issued Nov. 17, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 7,642,786, issued Jan. 5, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,642,787, issued Jan. 5, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,656,162, issued Feb. 2, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,688,074, issued Mar. 30, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,705,602, issued Apr. 27, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,706,992, issued Apr. 27, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,710,119, issued May 4, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,723,993, issued May 25, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,597, issued Jun. 1, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,850, issued Aug. 10, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,774,151, issued Aug. 10, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,612, issued Aug. 17, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,791,348, issued Sep. 7, 2010; U.S. Pat. No. 7,808,375, issued Oct. 5, 2010; U.S. Ser. No. 09/780,146, filed Feb. 9, 2001, entitled STORAGE BATTERY WITH INTEGRAL BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 09/756,638, filed Jan. 8, 2001, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING BATTERY PROPERTIES FROM COMPLEX IMPEDANCE/ADMITTANCE; U.S. Ser. No. 09/862,783, filed May 21, 2001, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING CELLS AND BATTERIES EMBEDDED IN SERIES/PARALLEL SYSTEMS; U.S. Ser. No. 09/880,473, filed Jun. 13, 2001; entitled BATTERY TEST MODULE; U.S. Ser. No. 10/042,451, filed Jan. 8, 2002, entitled BATTERY CHARGE CONTROL DEVICE; U.S. Ser. No. 10/109,734, filed Mar. 28, 2002, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COUNTERACTING SELF DISCHARGE IN A STORAGE BATTERY; U.S. Ser. No. 10/112,998, filed Mar. 29, 2002, entitled BATTERY TESTER WITH BATTERY REPLACEMENT OUTPUT; U.S. Ser. No. 10/263,473, filed Oct. 2, 2002, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH RELATIVE TEST OUTPUT; U.S. Ser. No. 10/310,385, filed Dec. 5, 2002, entitled BATTERY TEST MODULE; U.S. Ser. No. 09/653,963, filed Sep. 1, 2000, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING POWER GENERATION AND STORAGE; U.S. Ser. No. 10/174,110, filed Jun. 18, 2002, entitled DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHT CONTROL USING AN INTELLIGENT POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; U.S. Ser. No. 10/258,441, filed Apr. 9, 2003, entitled CURRENT MEASURING CIRCUIT SUITED FOR BATTERIES; U.S. Ser. No. 10/681,666, filed Oct. 8, 2003, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH PROBE LIGHT; U.S. Ser. No. 10/791,141, filed Mar. 2, 2004, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUDITING A BATTERY TEST; U.S. Ser. No. 10/867,385, filed Jun. 14, 2004, entitled ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE; U.S. Ser. No. 10/958,812, filed Oct. 5, 2004, entitled SCAN TOOL FOR ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 60/587,232, filed Dec. 14, 2004, entitled CELLTRON ULTRA, U.S. Ser. No. 60/653,537, filed Feb. 16, 2005, entitled CUSTOMER MANAGED WARRANTY CODE; U.S. Ser. No. 60/665,070, filed Mar. 24, 2005, entitled OHMMETER PROTECTION CIRCUIT; U.S. Ser. No. 60,694,199, filed Jun. 27, 2005, entitled GEL BATTERY CONDUCTANCE COMPENSATION; U.S. Ser. No. 60/705,389, filed Aug. 4, 2005, entitled PORTABLE TOOL THEFT PREVENTION SYSTEM, U.S. Ser. No. 11/207,419, filed Aug. 19, 2005, entitled SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GATHERING BATTERY INFORMATION FOR USE DURING BATTERY TESTER/CHARGING, U.S. Ser. No. 60/712,322, filed Aug. 29, 2005, entitled AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE, U.S. Ser. No. 60/713,168, filed Aug. 31, 2005, entitled LOAD TESTER SIMULATION WITH DISCHARGE COMPENSATION, U.S. Ser. No. 60/731,881, filed Oct. 31, 2005, entitled PLUG-IN FEATURES FOR BATTERY TESTERS; U.S. Ser. No. 60/731,887, filed Oct. 31, 2005, entitled AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE; U.S. Ser. No. 11/304,004, filed Dec. 14, 2005, entitled BATTERY TESTER THAT CALCULATES ITS OWN REFERENCE VALUES; U.S. Ser. No. 60/751,853, filed Dec. 20, 2005, entitled BATTERY MONITORING SYSTEM; U.S. Ser. No. 11/304,004, filed Dec. 14, 2005, entitled BATTERY TESTER WITH CALCULATES ITS OWN REFERENCE VALUES; U.S. Ser. No. 60/751,853, filed Dec. 20, 2005, entitled BATTERY MONITORING SYSTEM; U.S. Ser. No. 11/356,443, filed Feb. 16, 2006, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH NETWORK COMMUNICATION; U.S. Ser. No. 11/519,481, filed Sep. 12, 2006, entitled BROAD-BAND LOW-CONDUCTANCE CABLES FOR MAKING KELVIN CONNECTIONS TO ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS AND BATTERIES; U.S. Ser. No. 60/847,064, filed Sep. 25, 2006, entitled STATIONARY BATTERY MONITORING ALGORITHMS; U.S. Ser. No. 11/641,594, filed Dec. 19, 2006, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING A PARAMETER OF A VEHICLE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM; U.S. Ser. No. 60/950,182, filed Jul. 17, 2007, entitled BATTERY TESTER FOR HYBRID VEHICLE; U.S. Ser. No. 60/973,879, filed Sep. 20, 2007, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER FOR TESTING STATIONARY BATTERIES; U.S. Ser. No. 11/931,907, filed Oct. 31, 2007, entitled BATTERY MAINTENANCE WITH PROBE LIGHT; U.S. Ser. No. 60/992,798, filed Dec. 6, 2007, entitled STORAGE BATTERY AND BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 61/061,848, filed Jun. 16, 2008, entitled KELVIN CLAMP FOR ELECTRONICALLY COUPLING TO A BATTERY CONTACT; U.S. Ser. No. 12/168,264, filed Jul. 7, 2008, entitled BATTERY TESTERS WITH SECONDARY FUNCTIONALITY; U.S. Ser. No. 12/174,894, filed Jul. 17, 2008, entitled BATTERY TESTER FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE; U.S. Ser. No. 12/204,141, filed Sep. 4, 2008, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER OR CHARGER WITH DATABUS CONNECTION; U.S. Ser. No. 12/328,022, filed Dec. 4, 2008, entitled STORAGE BATTERY AND BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 12/416,457, filed Apr. 1, 2009, entitled SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GATHERING BATTERY INFORMATION; U.S. Ser. No. 12/416,453, filed Apr. 1, 2009, entitled INTEGRATED TAG READER AND ENVIRONMENT SENSOR; U.S. Ser. No. 12/416,445, filed Apr. 1, 2009, entitled SIMPLIFICATION OF INVENTORY MANAGEMENT; U.S. Ser. No. 12/485,459, filed Jun. 16, 2009, entitled CLAMP FOR ELECTRONICALLY COUPLING TO A BATTERY CONTACT; U.S. Ser. No. 12/498,642, filed Jul. 7, 2009, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 12/697,485, filed Feb. 1, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 12/698,375, filed Feb. 2, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 12/712,456, filed Feb. 25, 2010, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING CELL DETERIORATION IN AN ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL OR BATTERY; U.S. Ser. No. 61/311,485, filed Mar. 8, 2010, entitled BATTERY TESTER WITH DATABUS FOR COMMUNICATING WITH VEHICLE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; U.S. Ser. No. 61/313,893, filed Mar. 15, 2010, entitled USE OF BATTERY MANUFACTURE/SELL DATE IN DIAGNOSIS AND RECOVERY OF DISCHARGED BATTERIES; U.S. Ser. No. 12/758,407, filed Apr. 12, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH NETWORK COMMUNICATION; U.S. Ser. No. 12/765,323, filed Apr. 22, 2010, entitled AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE; U.S. Ser. No. 12/769,911, filed Apr. 29, 2010, entitled STATIONARY BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 61/330,497, filed May 3, 2010, entitled MAGIC WAND WITH ADVANCED HARNESS DETECTION; U.S. Ser. No. 12/774,892, filed May 6, 2010, entitled SCAN TOOL FOR ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 12/786,890, filed May 25, 2010, entitled BATTERY TESTER WITH PROMOTION FEATURE; U.S. Ser. No. 61/348,901, filed May 27, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 29/362,827, filed Jun. 1, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 61/351,017, filed Jun. 3, 2010, entitled IMPROVED ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY MODULE BALANCER; U.S. Ser. No. 12/818,290, filed Jun. 18, 2010, entitled BATTERY MAINTENANCE DEVICE WITH THERMAL BUFFER; U.S. Ser. No. 61/373,045, filed Aug. 12, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER FOR TESTING STATIONERY STORAGE BATTERY; U.S. Ser. No. 12/888,689, filed Sep. 23, 2010, entitled BATTERY TESTER FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE; U.S. Ser. No. 12/894,951, filed Sep. 30, 2010, entitled BATTERY PACK MAINTENANCE FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES; U.S. Ser. No. 61/411,162, filed Nov. 8, 2010, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Ser. No. 13/037,641, filed Mar. 1, 2011, entitled MONITOR FOR FRONT TERMINAL BATTERIES; which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

It is known that the condition of the battery can be determined by comparing a rating of the battery with a measured value. However, in some instances, simply comparing the measured value with the rating does not provide an accurate battery test and/or does not provide an efficient way of determining the condition of the storage battery.

SUMMARY

An electronic battery tester for testing a storage battery, includes connections configured to couple to terminals of the battery. Measurement circuitry is coupled to the connections and configured to measure a parameter of the battery. An input is configured to receive a battery age input variable. Computation circuitry is configured to provide a test output related to a condition of the battery based upon the measured parameter and the battery age input variable.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of an electronic battery tester in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of the battery tester of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a simplified flow chart showing steps in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides a battery tester and monitoring system in which the age of the battery is received by the system and used in the testing of the storage battery.

Since the introduction and manufacture of SLI (Starting/lighting/ignition) batteries for automobiles, testing methodology has relied primarily on BCI (Battery Council International) supported standards to measure the overall condition of the battery using hydrometer, load, and voltage drop testing standards.

With an increase in battery sales by mass retailers and service providers these traditional methods have been replaced by various electronic testers and fast chargers using various technologies including conductance, impedance, load, light, charge acceptance to both test and recovery discharged batteries, etc.

The Battery Council International has also published information on the average battery life calculations by geographic area. Manufactures of test equipment, retailers, battery manufactures, and service providers have been reluctant to modify specific test algorithms or charge recovery times solely based on the battery age or sell date, treating all batteries the same as presented for testing, charge, recovery, and in the determination of warranty acceptance. Class action lawsuits, fines, and criminal charges relating unscrupulous selling methods, sales incentive awards, or kickbacks for increasing battery sales have additionally contributed to the reluctance of retailers, battery manufacturers, service providers, and tester manufacturers in introducing additional manually inputted criteria that could be manipulated by uses of the equipment to deceive customers or construe an environment that could lead to misrepresentation of results to the customer. Potential liabilities, risks, and past legal issues outweighed the benefits generated by incorporating battery age into the testing criteria that would directly influence the testing algorithm in the determination of the batteries true condition and need for possible replacement.

Recent methodologies of incorporating battery age as part of the test process include only the printing of average battery life, the triggering of marginal battery indication, or additional information concerning the tested battery such as cold weather start performance, but do not, in general, influence or change the actual testing algorithms, criteria, recovery times, recovery methods, or analysis of the battery presented based on the batteries age or amount of time the battery has been in use. In general, all batteries are tested and charged in the same manner regardless of the age, warranty, non-warranty, or quality level classification (Good, Better, Best series) of battery purchased as presented to the testers or chargers.

While past practices have been regarded as acceptable methods for testing and charging batteries, advances in battery manufacturing technology and tighter quality control standards have significantly reduced manufacturing quality defects in battery production. Improved transportation infrastructure, packaging, and shipment methods have reduced damage during transit. Better management of stock rotation, turns, and retail rack systems has reduced potential problems created with the storage of the batteries prior to sale.

Advances in point of sale (POS) systems have also greatly advanced the information available to retailers, OEM's, distributors, and service providers regarding the manufacture, sell date, and useful life span. Several methodologies now exist to extract this information about the battery through scanning or input of serial number identifiers, date codes; RFID tags, and bar coding technology providing enhanced methods for determining battery age, sell date, and warranty tracking. Additionally this information can be uploaded automatically to the testers through the use of bar code scanning, RFID, POS transfer of information which reduces the manual inputs necessary by the operator greatly reducing potential errors associated with past manual input testing practices.

While manufactured battery defects continue to decline, newer automobiles have seen their power requirements increase with the addition by OEM's of Electronic Control Units or ECM's, TCM's, on-board entertainment systems, communication systems, power systems, environmental, and other OEM installed systems. Additionally consumers may add optional non-OEM devices to the vehicle requiring substantial power demands from the battery and charging system including power chargers for cell phone communication, computers, video players, high powered audio amplifiers, GPS navigation systems, lighting systems, along with many other optional devices which can demand high power consumption from the vehicle electrical systems.

Many times the vehicle's OEM electrical system may not have the capacity to supply all the vehicle power demands relying on the battery to supplement these demands. Situations involving short distance driving, stop/go driving, extended idling, and operating the accessories with the vehicle without engine running can significant deplete the power reserve capacities of these batteries. Additionally accessories left in the on position in an unintended can severely deplete the power reserves of the battery leading to a no-start situation with the vehicle.

With the complexity of these on-board systems and power demands for optional equipment it is not uncommon for a consumer to have a no-start situation occur and to assume that they need a new battery when in fact the cause if the no-start situation was the result of excessive power demands or charging system problem causing the discharged battery condition. Many of these consumers will install or purchase a new battery only to have the same no-start or discharged battery condition occur or repeat itself leading the customer to believe they have purchased a defective battery and asking for a free replacement under the terms of the free replacement warranty for manufacturing defect as the battery will not start the vehicle in its heavily discharged state.

Conventional testing and fast charging methodology using the rating of the battery and other inputs or conditions could significantly create longer wait times for all batteries to be tested or charged to determine if the battery is recoverable. Additionally, the knowledge gained on the age of the battery can aid to successfully identifying the cause of the discharge so that the consumer can address and fix the issue so that the situation does not reoccur. Additionally battery manufacturers and retailers can provide enhanced customer service and support to the consumer while reducing their warranty exposure on new battery sales. Battery age as an input can have a significant positive environmental impact in reduction of fossil fuels for the transport, recovery, recycling, and raw materials required replacing these good batteries for consumers with another warranty replacement.

The current policies of replacement of good batteries by retailers and service providers are estimated in excess of 500 million dollars annually.

As a battery ages, its internal components gradually wear out through corrosion, disintegration and shedding. When this happens, its conductance typically drops until it reaches a point at which the performance of the battery becomes significantly degraded and can cause a vehicle to not start. Similarly, a new battery which has been recently installed in a vehicle and experienced significant discharge from a power drain from lights being left in the on position, doors left open, accessory power drains, or a damaged charging system may also fail to start the vehicle.

Treating and/or recovering an 8-year old battery the same manner as a 1 week old battery greatly reduces the effectiveness of the equipment in determining the true battery condition in deeply discharges batteries. This leads to an increase in error rates, and lower recovery rates for deeply discharged batteries.

Through the input of battery age in the test process custom algorithms can be added to the testers and diagnostic chargers allowing customized test and recovery processes to occur that can significantly increase the overall accuracy, speed, and recovery rates for good batteries along with conveying important information to the operator and consumer regarding the potential reason for the No-Start condition.

Examples of the use of battery age include:

A battery submitted for testing is identified by the tester or charger as being sold within the last 2 days and analysis indicates the battery is in a severely discharged state. Knowing that the battery was recently manufactured and that quality defects make up less than 0.25% of return issues, the test algorithm is modified to indicate that charging is required. Similarly, in the use of a diagnostic charger, the algorithm is adjusted to allow for additional charge recovery time or modification of test/recovery algorithms in addition to communicating to the user specific outputs to aid the retailer or consumer in determining possible issues that could cause a battery to become severely discharged.

A consumer presenting a battery for testing that is eight years in age and in a discharged state would allow for tailoring of the test algorithm to seek out specific factors that are commonly found in older batteries such as sulfated conditions, plate or grid damage, bad-cell, or shorted conditions. The charge recovery rate for batteries of this age is substantially lower than the general population seen as sited in the previous 2-day old battery example. Testing and charging both batteries in the same manner again reduces the effectiveness of the equipment, impacts overall accuracy rates, and could prolong the test and recovery process creating longer customer wait times. Through the use of the input of battery age specific algorithms can be used to identify immediately to the customer the average life span for that type in addition to specific test and charge recovery algorithms tailored for older batteries based research of test & recovery methods for older batteries. These specific algorithms using battery age as an input will provide enhanced accuracy, faster test and recovery times, enhanced diagnostic output and recommendations for the user and consumer and better efficiency of equipment in a retail, OEM, or service environment.

Age Input Methodologies:

Inputting age and/or sales date of the battery into the tester or diagnostic charger can be using any appropriate technique. For example:

• • Unique serial Number ID on the battery
  • Unique Bar-Code on the Battery
  • Serial # tied to database
  • Unique Bar code tied to database
  • RFID Tag
  • RFID Tag tied to database
  • Receipt input—Manual
  • Receipt input—Bar Code
  • Receipt input—Database
  • Database—Customer ID—Phone, Name, customer #
  • Manual input—By User
  • Manual Input

FIG. 1 illustrates an electronic battery tester 16 which operates in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Tester 16 includes dynamic parameter measurement circuitry 2 which is configured to measure a dynamic parameter of battery 12 through first and second Kelvin connections 8A and 8B. Dynamic parameter measurement circuitry 2 measures a dynamic parameter, that is a parameter which is a function of a signal with a time varying component, of battery 12 and provides a dynamic parameter output 4 to calculation circuitry 6. Example dynamic parameters include dynamic conductance resistance, reactance, susceptance, and their combinations. Calculation circuitry 6 receives the dynamic parameter output 4 and an optional rating 8 which relates to a rating of battery 12 and an empirical input variable 9. Based upon the optional rating, the empirical input variable and the measured dynamic parameter output 4, calculation circuitry 6 responsively provides a relative test output 11 of battery 12.

In one aspect of the invention, the criteria used to test the storage battery 12 is adjusted based upon the age of the battery 12. For example, battery 12 is a new battery, a more stringent test and be applied to battery 12.

FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of circuitry 16 which operates in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention and determines a dynamic parameter such as the conductance (G_BAT) of battery 12 and the voltage potential (V_BAT) between terminals 22 and 24 of battery 12. Circuitry 16 includes a forcing function such as current source 50, differential amplifier 52, analog-to-digital converter 54 and microprocessor 56. In this embodiment, dynamic parameter measurement circuitry 2 shown in FIG. 1 generally comprises source 50, amplifier 52, analog to digital converter 54, amplifier 70 and microprocessor 56. Calculation circuitry 6 generally comprises microprocessor 56. The general blocks shown in FIG. 1 can be implemented as desired and are not limited to the configurations shown in FIG. 2. Amplifier 52 is capacitively coupled to battery 12 through capacitors C₁ and C₂. Amplifier 52 has an output connected to an input of analog-to-digital converter 54. Microprocessor 56 is connected to system clock 58, memory 60, pass/fail indicator 62 and analog-to-digital converter 54. Microprocessor 56 is also capable of receiving an input from input device 66. The input can be the empirical input variable, a rating of the battery, or other data as desired.

In operation, current source 50 is controlled by microprocessor 56 and provides a current in the direction shown by the arrow in FIG. 2. This can be any type of time varying signal. Source 50 can be an active source or a passive source such as a resistance. Differential amplifier 52 is connected to terminals 22 and 24 of battery 12 through capacitors C₁ and C₂, respectively, and provides an output related to the voltage potential difference between terminals 22 and 24. In a preferred embodiment, amplifier 52 has a high input impedance. Circuitry 16 includes differential amplifier 70 having inverting and noninverting inputs connected to terminals 24 and 22, respectively. Amplifier 70 is connected to measure the open circuit potential voltage (V_BAT) of battery 12 between terminals 22 and 24. The output of amplifier 70 is provided to analog-to-digital converter 54 such that the voltage across terminals 22 and 24 can be measured by microprocessor 56.

Circuitry 16 is connected to battery 12 through a four-point connection technique known as a Kelvin connection. This Kelvin connection allows current Ito be injected into battery 12 through a first pair of terminals while the voltage V across the terminals 22 and 24 is measured by a second pair of connections. Because very little current flows through amplifier 52, the voltage drop across the inputs to amplifier 52 is substantially identical to the voltage drop across terminals 22 and 24 of battery 12. The output of differential amplifier 52 is converted to a digital format and is provided to microprocessor 56. Microprocessor 56 operates at a frequency determined by system clock 58 and in accordance with programming instructions stored in memory 60.

Microprocessor 56 determines the conductance of battery 12 by applying microprocessor determines the dynamic conductance of battery 12 by applying a forcing function having a time varying component. The forcing function can be applied by current source 50 which operates as a forcing function source and may be any appropriate signal having a time varying component including a transient signal. The forcing function source 50 can, for example, operate by selectively applying a load such as a resistance. The microprocessor determines the change in battery voltage due to the current pulse I using amplifier 52 and analog-to-digital converter 54. The value of current I generated by current source 50 is known and is stored in memory 60. In one embodiment, current I is obtained by applying a load to battery 12. Microprocessor 56 calculates the conductance of battery 12 using the following equation:

$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{Conductance}=G_{\mathrm{Bat}}=\frac{\Delta I}{\Delta V}& \mathrm{Equation}1\end{array}$

where ΔI is the change in current flowing through battery 12 due to current source 50 and ΔV is the change in battery voltage due to applied current ΔI.

Microprocessor 56 operates in accordance with the present invention and determines the relative test output discussed herein. The relative test output can be provided on the data output. The data output can be a visual display or other device for providing information to an operator and/or can be an output provided to other circuitry.

As used herein, a dynamic parameter of the battery is a parameter which has been measured using an applied signal (either passively or actively) with a time varying component. Example dynamic parameters include dynamic resistance, conductance, reactance, susceptance and there combinations both real, imaginary and combinations, etc.

The present invention may be implemented using any appropriate technique. For simplicity, a single technique has been illustrated herein. However, other techniques may be used including implementation in all analog circuitry. Additionally, by using appropriate techniques, any dynamic parameter can be measured. With the present invention, a desired output level of the battery is obtained, for example through an input.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram 100 showing steps in accordance with one example embodiment of the present invention. These steps can be implemented using the circuitry shown in FIG. 2. For example, the steps can be implemented in microprocessor 56 in accordance with programming instructions stored in memory 60.

At block 102, the process is initiated and control is passed to block 104 where the battery tester 16 receives battery age information from input 66. This battery age information can be received through any appropriate techniques including a user input, the input may be a date, unique identifier of the battery, code identifier of the manufacture date, information related to a sale date, any information related to manufacture date, etc. The input can be to a manual input or through other non-manual techniques such as a barcode input, serial number input, a RFID (Radio Frequency Identification tag), input contained on a purchase receipt or warranty card, retrieved from a database based upon purchase information such as information which identifies the purchase, etc.

At block 106, battery test information is retrieved, for example, from memory 60. This test information can be a particular test criteria, a particular battery test, etc. including information stored in memory 60 of battery tester 106. The battery test information retrieved at block 106 is modified based upon the received age information at block 108. The test itself may be modified (in other words, different types of test are applied such as a load test, etc.) or steps in the test are modified, for example, the battery must be recharged prior to test. In another example, the test criteria is modified, in other words, the test result for a new battery may be indicated as a failure whereas the same test result for an older battery may be considered a successful test.

At block 110, the battery test is performed. This battery test can be in accordance with any appropriate technique and is not limited to the tests described herein. An output from the battery test result is provided at block 112. This output can be provided locally or can be sent to a remote location or to other electronic circuitry. The output may be in a human readable form or it may be in a form that is readable by machine. The output may include the received battery aging information or otherwise be based upon the battery age information. This may be in the form of the modified battery test result, or some other form. The output may be encrypted such that it is not easily modified in order to reduce falsified warranty claims. At block 114, the process terminates.

The age information can be used in any type of battery maintenance device and is not limited to a battery tester. For example, device 16 may comprise any type of battery maintenance device such as a battery tester or a charger, a combination of the two, a charger that includes diagnostic capabilities, etc.

Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A battery maintenance device for performing battery maintenance on a storage battery, comprising: Kelvin connections configured to couple to terminals of the battery;measurement circuitry coupled to the Kelvin connections configured to measure a dynamic parameter of the battery and a voltage across terminals of the battery, wherein the dynamic parameter is a function of a signal with a time varying component;a battery age input configured to receive battery age data related to age of the storage battery;computation circuitry configured to provide a test output related to a condition of the battery based upon the measured dynamic parameter and the battery age data; andan output configured to provide an output to a remote lacation.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the battery maintenance device comprises a battery tester.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the battery maintenance device comprises a battery charger.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the input comprises a manual input.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the input comprises a bar code reader.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the input comprises an RFID input.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the age data comprises data related to the manufacture date of the battery.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 including an output configured to provide a local output.

9. The apparatus of claim 1 including an output that comprises an encrypted output.

10. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein a battery test criteria is modified based upon the age data.

11. A method of performing maintenance on a storage battery, comprising: receiving battery age information related to an age of the storage battery;retrieving battery test information, wherein the battery test information is based at least in part on a measured dynamic parameter of the storage battery, and wherein the dynamic parameter is a function of a signal with a time varying component;modifying a battery test based upon the received age information;performing a battery test based upon the retrieved battery test information;providing a battery test output as a function of the performed battery test and the received battery age information; andproviding an encrypted output.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein receiving battery age information comprises receiving a manual input.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein receiving battery age information comprises receiving a bar code input.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein receiving battery age information comprises receiving an RFID input.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein the age information comprises data related to sales date related to the battery.

16. The method of claim 11 wherein the age information comprises data related to the manufacture date of the battery.

17. The method of claim 11 including providing a local output.

18. The method of claim 11 including providing an output to a remote location.

19. The method of claim 11 wherein a battery test criteria is modified based upon the battery age information.