1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to access control, and, more particularly, to manually operated, electronically keyed locks and locking processes suitable for retrofitting existing appliances.
2. Description of the Related Art
Current designs for maintaining security of containers such as bank safe deposit boxes require attended access and, all too frequently, dual keys, to allow access to the various containers maintained. We have found that the use of dual keys has become increasingly expensive in terms of man hours consumed by the employees of the bank providing attendance to the customers of the bank. Historically, safe deposit locks as well as other locks, have used a keyed cylinder that is offset from the centerline of the casing for the lock, within the body immediately behind the front plate of the safe deposit door. It was the object of this design to accommodate a full sized set of mechanical tumblers within the casing immediately behind the front plate of the door. The economics of safe deposit box rental require that the casing of the lock be made narrow in order to provide a high degree of security for the door while minimizing the loss of volume of the door due to the presence of the casing for the lock. The offsetting of the centerline of the keyway in turn allows the use of a more conventional and secure design within the very narrow compartment doors, as well as within taller doors. By the expedient of placing the cylinder of the lock in the lower portion of the casing, below the centerline of the casing and vault, the key could lift a set of larger tumblers without requiring an undesirably larger lock casing. The economy of providing uniform lock design, over the years, for differing applications has resulted in an existing installed base of millions of these locks. While not all of these locks rely upon offset keyed cylinders (referred to as “noses” in the trade), many do.
Four major lock manufacturers currently continue to produce locks with offset keyed cylinders, while at least two other manufacturers that have discontinued production, continue to have a large installed base. One of the most popular offset locks in the current market is the 4440 series left hand and right hand model manufactured by Sargent And Greenleaf. We have noticed a need to retrofit existing offset keyed cylinder locks with electro-mechanical locks, without expensive and inconvenient replacement of the doors, in order to minimize the man hours consumed by employees of banks that provide attendance to the customers, while the customers open their safe deposit doors, with a mechanical enhancement of blocking strength as well as an improvement of security over other processes, without a complex electrical contact system.
We have also noticed that authorized service mechanics often open locked mechanical safe deposit locks by first drilling a hole through the face of the cylinder plug, threading a sheet metal or self tapping screw into the hole and pulling the inserted screw with either a nose puller or claw hammer until the face of the cylinder breaks away to allow removal of the cylinder plug. The removal of the cylinder plug allows direct and immediate frontal manipulation of the tumblers until the lock is unlocked. Consequently, even though the faceplate of the safe deposit door may itself be strong enough to resist casual tampering, the susceptibility of the cylinder plug to quick removal by a single application of brute force deleteriously reduces the security of the entire drawer.
The Electronic Security System of U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,044 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,317 issued to Hyatt et al., is currently used to lock pay telephones. This design blocks a locking bolt, but does so from what we believe is a geometrically disadvantageous point. By virtue of the separate direct blocking of a bolt by a solenoid, the bolt is blocked off center from the centerline of the bolt. Moreover, the physically large lock cylinder and the inter-device discrete wiring between the solenoid and the other components inside the casing, as well as the electrical contact system for the lock cylinder, create several problems in our opinion. Furthermore, the difficulty of manufacture and installation of wiring, and the absence of both miniaturization and offsetting of the bolt blocking, suggest that there is little practical prospect of retrofitting the many existing offset nose locks. In addition, the routing and use of discrete wires causes problems of reliability and quality during manufacture and usage, absent tedious careful and consistent monitoring.
The rotatable keypad operated solenoid lock of Butterweck, et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,845,523 for an Electronic Input And Dial Entry Lock, and the other various locks mentioned in that patent such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,831,851 for a Combination/electronic Lock System by Larson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,967,577 for an Electronic Lock With Manual Override by Gartner, et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,899,562 for an Electronic Door Lock by Gartner, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,904,984 for a Combination Lock With An Additional Security Lock by Gartner, are variations of a dial operated combination lock, and lack the security, reliability and economy traditionally demanded for safe deposit boxes and drawers, while the Lock For A Safe-Deposit Box of Chieh-Chen Yen, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,495,733 inconveniently relies upon different keys for the renter of the safe deposit box and for the clerk of the bank, as well as a manually operated keypad.
Generally, we have noticed that many of these locks remain susceptible to mechanical tampering. By way of example, we have the tolerances of some of these locks have a configuration that translates a force that is externally applied to the casing of the lock to translate that force into an inertia that causes a locking component such as a pin, latching mechanism, detent or sidebar to travel in the opposite direction from its locked position, and to be temporarily disengaged from whatever groove, recess or slot it occupied prior to application of the force. This allows a torque that was contemporaneously applied to the lock to operate the lock, such as by rotating the cylinder plug within the shell of the cylinder.
It is therefore, an object of the present invention to provide an improved lock and process for restricting access to containers.
It is another object to provide a lock and process suitable for retrofitting containers previously secured by bitted and unbitted locks.
It is yet another object to provide a lock and process able to enhance the security of containers against unauthorized entry.
It is still another object to provide a lock and process able to electronically control access to the interior of secured containers.
It is still yet another object to provide a lock and process for electronically monitoring access to secured containers.
It is a further object to provide an electronically key controlled process and a cam assembly that may be configured as a single integrated electromechanical unit operable with an electronically controlled key, mated with either the existing lock cylinders of containers or with new lock cylinders, and retroactively fitted to secure those containers.
It is a still further object to provide an electronically key controlled process and integrated electromechanical cam assembly that may either be installed as a retroactively fitted component part of an existing locking mechanism with a minimum of modifications of the locking mechanism, or alternatively, be incorporated into a complete locking mechanism.
It is still yet a further object to provide an electronically key controlled process and integrated electromechanical cam assembly that may be retroactively installed as a component part of locking mechanisms previously installed in lockable containers by using existing screw patterns and key holes of those containers.
It is an additional object to provide an electronically key controlled process and integrated electromechanical cam assembly able to be mated with either bitted lock cylinders or with unbitted cylinder plugs.
It is still an additional object to provide an electronic cam and cam locking process endowed with simplified interconnections between the components of the lock, and that is amenable to simplified manufacture.
It is yet an additional object to provide an electronic cam and cam locking process endowed with an enhanced mechanical strength.
It is still yet an additional object to provide an electronic cam and cam locking process that indirectly blocks the cam.
It is also an object to provide a locking cam and cam locking process that drives and locks the bolt from its relative center.
These and other objects may be achieved with a process and a lock for securing access to the interior of a volume. The lock may be constructed with a housing bearing an interior recess containing a pair of axially aligned and spaced apart detents. A locking mechanism is removably inserted within the recess. The locking mechanism may be constructed with a single annularly wound coil of insulated wire to form a circular cylinder surrounding a central axially oriented bore, with the wire terminated by a single pair of leads. The bore perforates axially opposite base ends of the coil. A pair of armatures made of a material that is movably responsive to magnetic force, each exhibit a distal end. The armatures are both slidably positioned at axially opposite ends of the bore, in coaxially aligned axial opposition. One or more springs are coaxially aligned with the armatures, to bias both armatures to extend their distal ends axially outwardly beyond axially opposite base ends of the coil.
The housing of the lock may be positioned to control access by alternately assuming a locked state and an unlocked state. The housing holds the locking mechanism with its bore axially aligned between the pair of detents, so that the detents provide simultaneous engagement of the distal ends of the armatures and maintaining the lock in its locked state. When a potential difference is applied across the leads of the coil, the distal ends both withdraw axially away from their engagement with the detents and travel towards the bore to place the lock in its unlocked state and thereby allow access to the interior of the volume secured by the lock.
When the mechanism is incorporated into the body of a lock, by electrically energizing a release mechanism that is spaced-apart from the axis of rotation of the cylinder plug, the magnetic field created by the coil within its bore draws the coaxially aligned armatures in opposite directions toward the centroid of the bore; consequently, both armatures move between a deployed position preventing rotation of the cam or cylinder plug of the lock relative to the housing, and a released position accommodating the rotation of the cam or the cylinder plug relative to the housing.
A more complete appreciation of the invention, and many of the attendant advantages thereof, will be readily apparent as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference symbols indicate the same or similar components, wherein:
Turning now to the drawings and specifically to
A prototype of the embodiment shown in
Coil 122 may be wound upon electrical bobbin 134 that defines the circular area and axial length of central bore 130. Apertures 134 in the distal ends of armature 124 may be used to attach the distal ends of armature 124 to other components. Alternatively, stops may be placed in apertures 134 to block the axial motion of armature 124 and thereby prevent the distal ends of armature 124 from entering into axial bore 130.
Turning now to
The dual armature solenoid 120 shown in
The embodiment illustrated in
Subsequent application of a potential difference across leads 128 will cause current to flow through coil 122, thereby electrically creating a magnetic field that will generate oppositely directed forces that retract armatures 124 axially into the center 150 of axial bore 130 surrounded by coil 122. This will withdraw the distal ends of armatures 124 from apertures 188 and contemporaneously allow drawer 180 to be drawn outwardly with bracket 186 removed from between end walls 184, thereby allowing drawer 180 to remain open once the potential difference has been removed from across leads 128.
It may be seen from the foregoing paragraphs that the embodiments of the present invention provide an electromechanical release mechanism that protects the security provided by a lock equipped with a solenoid from deliberate application of external force applied to the lock in an effort to dislodge armatures 124 from engaging their corresponding slots 188 within the lock. The dimensions of the solenoid is quite small, thereby enabling the solenoid to be incorporated within the cylinder plugs of locks equipped with mechanical pin tumblers. The dimensions of the solenoid also enables the solenoid to be mounted to accommodate both radial and, in different embodiments, axial movement of the armatures relative to the housing, or shell of the lock.
Locks equipped with a dual armature solenoid may be employed as components of a system that uses a process for programming (i.e., in some instances a computer terminal), an optional key programming station, an electronic key, and an electronic cam. Generally, the foregoing paragraphs describe a lock that may be constructed with a housing bearing a hole centered upon a first axis, a bolt supported by the housing and moving transversely relative to the first axis to protrude beyond the housing to an extended position and to retract within the housing to a retracted position, a cylinder plug perforated by a keyway, having an exposed circumferential surface surrounding the keyway rotatably fitted within the hole, and rotating within the hole in response to rotational force applied by a key conformingly corresponding to the lock through an arc centered upon the first axis, a cam positioned to rotate with the cylinder plug as the key conformingly corresponding to the lock manually applies a rotational force to the cylinder plug rotates through a arc, a member eccentrically positioned relative to the axis, extending between the cam and the bolt to drive the bolt between the extended and the retracted positions as the cylinder plug turns through the arc, an electronic circuit containing a memory and a microprocessor, mounted upon and supported by the cam to rotate with the cam through the arc, the electronic circuit operationally responding to digital data carried by the key conformingly corresponding to the lock when the microprocessor determines that the digital data conformingly corresponds to resident data stored within the memory, a release spaced-apart from the cylinder and eccentrically positioned away from the first axis, the release being functionally activated by the electronic circuit to move between a deployed position preventing rotation of the cam relative to the housing, and a released position accommodating the rotation of the cam relative to the housing of the lock. By electrically energizing a release mechanism that is spaced-apart from the axis of rotation of the cylinder plug, the magnetic field created by the coil within its bore draws the armatures in opposite directions toward the centroid of the bore; consequently, both armatures move between a deployed position preventing rotation of the cam or cylinder plug of the lock relative to the housing, and a released position accommodating the rotation of the cam or the cylinder plug relative to the housing. It maybe appreciated therefore, that embodiments of mechanisms equipped the foregoing solenoids may be used to retrofit locks that are already installed, typically by simply replacing a single component of the lock.
This application makes reference to, incorporates the same herein, and claims all rights accruing from our earlier filing of a provisional patent application entitled Electronic Cam Assembly filed in the United States Patent & Trademark Office on the 6th day of Jun. 1997 and there assigned Ser. No. 60/050,941, and our patent application entitled ELECTRONIC CAM ASSEMBLY filed in the United States Patent & Trademark Office on the 5th day of Jun. 1998 and there assigned Ser. No. 09/092,080, now issued on the 3rd of Apr. 2001 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,209,367.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1817592 | Sokoloff | Aug 1931 | A |
2946875 | Waldhauer, Jr. | Jul 1960 | A |
3344377 | Clements | Sep 1967 | A |
3914723 | Goodbar | Oct 1975 | A |
3961298 | Jaffe et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4288944 | Donovan | Sep 1981 | A |
4503411 | Lofstrand | Mar 1985 | A |
4656850 | Tabata | Apr 1987 | A |
4671086 | Fogleman et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682133 | Kern | Jul 1987 | A |
4800741 | Kerschenbaum et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5435343 | Buezis | Jul 1995 | A |
5717372 | Cannon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734310 | Ankney et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6002184 | Delson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 221 714 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2 226 593 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2 250 052 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2 259 737 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2 243 185 | Oct 1991 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20010040492 A1 | Nov 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60050941 | Jun 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09092080 | Jun 1998 | US |
Child | 09822852 | US |