Patent Grant
10432033
The present disclosure generally relates to the wireless transmission of electrical energy and data. More specifically, this application relates to various embodiments which enable the transmission of wireless electrical energy by near-field magnetic coupling through an electrically conductive material.
Near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) is a commonly employed technique to wirelessly transfer electrical energy. The electrical energy may be used to directly power a device, charge a battery or both.
In near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) an oscillating magnetic field generated by a transmitting antenna passes through a receiving antenna that is spaced from the transmitting antenna, thereby creating an alternating electrical current that is received by the receiving antenna.
However, when a magnetic field interacts with an electrically conductive material, such as a metal, a circulating eddy current is induced on the surface of the conductive material as described by Faraday's Law. The eddy current generated on the surface of the conductive material generates a secondary magnetic field which opposes an incident magnetic field generated by the transmitting antenna. The interaction between the incident magnetic field generated by the transmitting antenna and the opposing secondary magnetic field, generated by the eddy current induced in the metallic material, prevents the transmission of electrical energy from the transmitting antenna to the receiving antenna. Thus, the inclusion of a metallic substrate or backing with electronic devices that incorporate near field magnetic coupling wireless charging is prohibited. The interaction of the incident magnetic field with a metallic material comprising an exterior surface of a device prevents near-field wireless electrical energy transmission with the device.
In addition, the circulating eddy current causes undesirable heating of the conductive material. Such heating may result in the loss of wireless energy but also could result in damage to the electrical components within the device due to the increased heat. Currently, materials in which NFMC wireless energy can transmit through are limited to non-conductive materials, such as glass, that do not deleteriously affect the incident magnetic flux lines from a transmitting antenna. Incorporation of an electrically conductive material, such as a metal, within at least a portion of an exterior surface of a device, may be required. Electrically conductive materials provide structural support to such electronic devices as cellular phones, wearable devices, and medical devices, all of which could benefit from wireless transfer of electrical energy through NFMC. Thus, there is a need for NFMC wireless energy transfer through a metallic material.
The present disclosure relates to the transfer of wireless electrical energy to and from devices that incorporate electrically conductive material, such as a metal. Such devices may include, but are not limited to, consumer electronics, medical devices, and devices used in industrial and military applications.
In one or more embodiments, an electrically conductive material, such as a metal substrate or plate is provided that is configured having at least one opening that extends through its thickness. In one or more embodiments, the electrically conductive material comprises at least a portion of an exterior surface of an electronic device. For example, the electrically conductive material may comprise a device cover, a casing, a backing, or a device enclosure. In some embodiments, an electrically conductive material is provided having a specific pattern of openings that extend through the thickness. Such a pattern of openings that extend through the conductive material is designed to modify the magnitude and path of the induced eddy current on the surface of the electrically conductive material to allow for wireless energy transfer via NFMC through the electrically conductive material.
In one or more embodiments, an opening, cut-out, slit, or combination thereof is formed through the thickness of an electrically conductive material. This opening, cut-out or slit in its simplest form may be configured in a circular, ovular or a rectangular geometric shape. However, the opening may be configured in a plurality of non-limiting geometric shapes or pattern of openings. For example, the opening may comprise a logo, company name, or emblem of a product manufacturer. In addition, the opening may provide additional device functionality such as an opening for a camera lens, a fingerprint sensor, or an opening for additional device control or input port.
In one or more embodiments, the opening may comprise at least one slit that extends through the thickness of the electrically conductive material and traverses from a location within the electrically conductive material. In one or more embodiments, the at least one slit may radially extend from a cut-out pattern to or through an edge of the electrically conductive material, such as a metallic backing of a device. The primary objective of the slit is to prevent the formation of an eddy current loop on the surface of the electrically conductive material. Such eddy current loops on the surface of an electrically conductive material disrupt wireless transmission of electrical energy via NFMC.
Thus, by alternating the circulation path of the eddy current on the surface of the electrically conductive material, the opposed magnetic fields produced by the eddy current is modified, thereby allowing for wireless transmission of electrical energy through the electrically conductive material via NFMC.
In one or more embodiments, a magnetic field shielding material, such as a ferrite material, may also be incorporated within the antenna sub-assembly comprising the electrically conductive material with the at least one cutout and slit. Such magnetic shielding materials may be used to strategically block the opposing magnetic fields created by the eddy current, thus improving the amount and efficiency of the wirelessly transmitted electrical energy.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and/or circuitry have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
The various embodiments illustrated in the present disclosure provide for the wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data. More specifically, the various embodiments of the present disclosure provide for the wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data via near field magnetic coupling through a metallic material, such as a metallic backing or metallic casing of an electronic device.
Referring to
However, as illustrated in
For example, if the incident magnetic field 14 from the transmitting antenna 10 is H1, and the opposing secondary magnetic field 18 generated by the eddy current emanating from the electrically conductive material 16 is H2, then the resultant magnetic field is HNET=H1−H2. Thus, the interaction of the two magnetic fields 14, 18 reduces or may cancel the magnitude of the incident magnetic field 14 emanating from the transmitting antenna 10, thereby significantly reducing the amount or entirely blocking electrical energy from being wirelessly transmitted to a device 22 (
In addition, the circulating eddy current may cause undesirable heating of the electrically conductive material 16. Such heating may not only result in loss of wireless energy but also could result in damage to other device components and circuitry due to the increased heat. Currently, materials through which NFMC wireless energy can transfer without deleteriously affecting the magnetic flux lines are limited to non-conductive materials, such as glass. However, such compatible materials are limited and may prevent desired device design and structural performance attributes. Furthermore, in an environment with various materials with varying electrical and magnetic properties, multiple eddy current effects may be created that negatively affect wireless electrical energy transmission via NFMC and also may result in undesirable heating of the device 22.
The intensity and location of the opposing secondary magnetic fields 18 depend on the magnitude and path of the eddy currents on the surface of the electrically conductive material 16. Thus, by creating appropriate cut-out and/or slit patterns that extend through the thickness of an electrically conductive material, eddy current patterns are modified such that electrical energy is able to be transmitted wirelessly, efficiently and undisturbed through the material 16.
As will be discussed and illustrated in the various embodiments, the present disclosure provides for various opening configurations, including but not limited to a cut-out, a slit, or a combination thereof, that alters the path of the eddy current on the surface of the electrically conductive material 16 and thus mitigates the magnitude of the opposing secondary magnetic field 18 created by the eddy current. As a result, the magnetic flux of the secondary magnetic field 18 is significantly reduced in the area of the cut-out/slit pattern. Furthermore, the use of the cut-out and/or slit pattern of the present disclosure may intensify the eddy current within the cut-out/slit pattern. As a result, the magnetic flux of the incident magnetic field 14 from the transmitting antenna 10 is increased in the cut-out/slit pattern. This increase in magnetic flux of the incident magnetic field 14 from the transmitting antenna 10 increases mutual inductance between the transmitting and receiving antennas 10, 12 and, in turn, increases the efficiency of wireless electrical energy transfer between the two antennas.
In one or more embodiments, the present disclosure provides at least one substrate 24 as illustrated in
In one or more embodiments, the slit 32, cut-out 30, or combination thereof prevents the formation of an eddy current loop at the periphery of the electrically conductive material 16. The formation of an eddy current loop at the periphery of an electrically conductive material 16 disrupts the wireless transmission of electrical energy via NFMC. In addition, the cut-out 30 and/or slit 32 pattern changes the direction of the eddy current such that it creates a magnetic field having the same polarity as the incident magnetic field 14 created by the transmitting antenna 10. This, therefore, helps to improve antenna-to-antenna efficiency.
In one or more embodiments, the cut-out 30 and/or slit 32 pattern of the present application is specifically designed to improve mutual inductance and transmitting antenna to receiving antenna efficiency without adding additional turns to the coil of the receiving antenna 12 or increasing the permeability or thickness of a magnetic shielding material 34, such as a ferrite material, that may be positioned behind the receiving antenna 12. As such, the present disclosure improves the efficiency of wireless energy transfer between the transmitting and receiving antennas 10, 12 by decreasing the equivalent series resistance (ESR) and increasing the inductance and quality factor of the receiving antenna 12 that is positioned adjacent to an electrically conductive substrate 24 comprising the cut-out/slit pattern of the present application.
In this application, the inventive concepts particularly pertain to near-field magnetic coupling (NFMC). NFMC enables the transfer of electrical energy and/or data wirelessly through magnetic induction between a transmitting antenna 10 and a corresponding receiving antenna 12. The NFMC standard, based on near-field communication interface and protocol modes, is defined by ISO/IEC standard 18092. Furthermore, as defined herein “inductive charging” is a wireless charging technique that utilizes an alternating electromagnetic field to transfer electrical energy between two antennas. “Resonant inductive coupling” is defined herein as the near field wireless transmission of electrical energy between two magnetically coupled coils that are tuned to resonate at a similar frequency. As defined herein, “mutual inductance” is the production of an electromotive force in a circuit by a change in current in a second circuit magnetically coupled to the first circuit.
As defined herein a “shielding material” is a material that captures a magnetic field. Examples of shielding material include, but are not limited to ferrite materials such as zinc comprising ferrite materials such as manganese-zinc, nickel-zinc, copper-zinc, magnesium-zinc, and combinations thereof. A shielding material thus may be used to direct a magnetic field to or away from an object, such as a parasitic metal, depending on the position of the shielding material within or nearby an electrical circuit. Furthermore, a shielding material can be used to modify the shape and directionality of a magnetic field. As defined herein a parasitic material, such as a parasitic metal, is a material that induces eddy current losses in the inductor antenna. This is typically characterized by a decrease in inductance and an increase in resistance of the antenna, i.e., a decrease in the quality factor. An “antenna” is defined herein as a structure that wirelessly receives or transmits electrical energy or data. An antenna comprises a resonator that may comprise an inductor coil or a structure of alternating electrical conductors and electrical insulators. Inductor coils are preferably composed of an electrically conductive material such as a wire, which may include, but is not limited to, a conductive trace, a filar, a filament, a wire, or combinations thereof.
It is noted that throughout this specification the terms, “wire”, “trace”, “filament” and “filar” may be used interchangeably. As defined herein, the word “wire” is a length of electrically conductive material that may either be of a two dimensional conductive line or track that may extend along a surface or alternatively, a wire may be of a three dimensional conductive line or track that is contactable to a surface. A wire may comprise a trace, a filar, a filament or combinations thereof. These elements may be a single element or a multitude of elements such as a multifilar element or a multifilament element. Further, the multitude of wires, traces, filars, and filaments may be woven, twisted or coiled together such as in a cable form. The wire as defined herein may comprise a bare metallic surface or alternatively, may comprise a layer of electrically insulating material, such as a dielectric material that contacts and surrounds the metallic surface of the wire. A “trace” is an electrically conductive line or track that may extend along a surface of a substrate. The trace may be of a two dimensional line that may extend along a surface or alternatively, the trace may be of a three dimensional conductive line that is contactable to a surface. A “filar” is an electrically conductive line or track that extends along a surface of a substrate. A filar may be of a two dimensional line that may extend along a surface or alternatively, the filar may be a three dimensional conductive line that is contactable to a surface. A “filament” is an electrically conductive thread or threadlike structure that is contactable to a surface. “Operating frequency” is defined as the frequency at which the receiving and transmitting antennas operate. “Self-resonating frequency” is the frequency at which the resonator of the transmitting or receiving antenna resonates.
As defined herein a “slit” is an opening having a length, a width oriented perpendicular to the length and a depth that extends through the substrate thickness, wherein the length is greater than the width. A “cut-out” or a “cut-out portion” is defined herein as an opening having an area that is oriented about perpendicular to a depth that extends through a substrate thickness. The area may be configured of a plurality of geometric shapes that include, but are not limited to an oval, a circle, a square, a rectangle, a triangle, a hexagon, an octagon, or any non-limiting polygon shape. In one or more embodiments, the area of the slit and “cut-out” are co-planar to a surface of the substrate that is perpendicular to the substrate thickness.
In one or more embodiments, the substrate 24 comprising the cut-out 30, slit 32, or combination thereof of the present disclosure is positioned adjacent to the receiving coil 54 of a receiving antenna 12 configured to receive electrical energy wirelessly transmitted via NFMC. As such, positioning the cut-out 30, slit 32, or a combination thereof adjacent to the receiving coil 54 of the receiving antenna 12 disrupts the circular path of the eddy current on the surface of the electrically conductive substrate 24. In addition, positioning the cut-out 30, slit 32, or combination thereof adjacent to the receiving coil 54 of the receiving antenna 12 allows for the eddy current 15 to flow within the cut-out and/or slit pattern in the same direction as the wirelessly transmitted electrical energy, thus, the magnetic flux of the incident magnetic field 14 from the transmitting antenna 10 is increased as the incident magnetic field 14 travels through the cut-out and/or slit pattern of the electrically conductive substrate 24. Thus, the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the receiving antenna 12 is reduced, and the inductance and quality factor of the receiving antenna 12 is increased. As a result, mutual inductance and efficiency between the transmitting and receiving antennas 10, 12 is increased which enables efficient wireless transmission of electrical energy through the electrically conductive substrate 24. It is further contemplated that the electrically conductive substrate 24 comprising the cut-out 30, slit 32 or combination thereof, may be positioned adjacent to a transmitting coil 20 of the transmitting antenna 10.
In one or more embodiments, as shown in
In addition, a shielding material 34, such as a ferrite, may be positioned facing a side of the transmitting or receiving antenna 10, 12 opposite an opposite side facing the substrate 24 comprising the cut-out/slit pattern. In one or more embodiments, the shielding material 34 may be positioned in contact with the transmitting or receiving antenna 10, 12 or may be spaced from the antenna by a shielding material gap. In one or more embodiments, as illustrated in
In one or more embodiments, the shielding material 34 may be a ferrite material with a loss tangent as low as possible. In one or more embodiments, the loss tangent of the ferrite material may be equal to or less than 0.70 at the antenna operating frequency. Such shielding materials may include, but are not limited to, zinc comprising ferrite materials such as manganese-zinc, nickel-zinc, copper-zinc, magnesium-zinc, and combinations thereof. These and other ferrite material formulations may be incorporated within a polymeric material matrix so as to form a flexible ferrite substrate. Examples of such materials may include but are not limited to, FFSR and FFSX series ferrite materials manufactured by Kitagawa Industries America, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. and Flux Field Directional RFIC material, manufactured by 3M™ Corporation of Minneapolis, Minn. In one or more embodiments, the transmitting or receiving antenna 10, 12 incorporated with the shielding material 34, such as a ferrite material, should have a self-resonance frequency (SRF)>1.5 times the operating frequency, preferably an SRF>3times the operating frequency. For example, if the operating frequency is 6.78 MHz, then the SRF of the antenna should be greater than 10 MHz.
In one or more embodiments, the transmitting or receiving antenna 10, 12 may comprise at least one inductor coil such as the non-limiting examples disclosed in U.S. Pat. App. Nos. 2017/0040690, 2017/0040692, 2017/0040107, 2017/0040105, 2017/0040696, and 2017/0040688 all to Peralta et al., 2017/0040691, 2017/0040694 to Singh et al., 2017/0040693 to Luzinski and 2017/0040695 to Rajagopalan et al., all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present application and incorporated fully herein. In addition, the transmitting or receiving antenna 10, 12 may be configured in a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) construction in which at least one insulator is positioned between a plurality of conductors. Non-limiting examples of antennas having an MLMT construction that may be incorporated with the present disclosure may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,610,530, 8,653,927, 8,680,960, 8,692,641, 8,692,642, 8,698,590, 8,698,591, 8,707,546, 8,710,948, 8,803,649, 8,823,481, 8,823,482, 8,855,786, 8,898,885, 9,208,942, 9,232,893, 9,300,046, all to Singh et al., and assigned to the assignee of the present application are incorporated fully herein. It is also noted that other antennas such as, but not limited to, an antenna configured to send and receive signals in the UHF radio wave frequency such IEEE standard 802.15.1 may be incorporated within the present disclosure.
In one or more embodiments, the inductor coils 20, 54 of either the transmitting or receiving antennas 10, 12 are strategically positioned to facilitate reception and/or transmission of wirelessly transferred electrical power or data through near field magnetic induction. Antenna operating frequencies may comprise all operating frequency ranges, examples of which may include, but are not limited to, about 100 kHz to about 200 kHz (Qi interface standard), 100 kHz to about 350 kHz (PMA interface standard), 6.78 MHz (Rezence interface standard), or alternatively at an operating frequency being employed by a device in a proprietary recharging mode. In addition, the antenna 10, 12 of the present disclosure may be designed to receive or transmit over a wide range of operating frequencies on the order of about 1 kHz to about 1 GHz or greater, in addition to the Qi and Rezence interfaces standards.
In one or more an embodiments, the electrically insulative substrate 64 is positioned adjacent to the second electrically conductive substrate 70 opposite the side contacting the shielding material 34. In one or more embodiments, the second electrically conductive substrate 70 is composed of an electrically conductive material, non-limiting examples include, but are not limited to copper, nickel, aluminum or a combination thereof. In one or more embodiments, the second electrically conductive substrate 70 may comprise a structural backing, a printed circuit board (not shown) or a sidewall of a battery (not shown). The electrically insulative substrate 64 is intended to provide mechanical stability to the structure of the sub-assembly stack-up configuration.
As further illustrated in
As shown in the various embodiments, three different magnetic shielding materials such as, a first material 96, a second material 98 and a third material 100, each having a different permeability, loss tangent, and/or magnetic flux saturation density may be used in the construction of the antenna of the present disclosure. In one or more embodiments, the first material 96 may comprise at least one of the FFSX series of ferrite materials having a permeability of about 100 to about 120 across a frequency range of at least 100 kHz to 7 MHz. The second material 98 may comprise the RFIC ferrite material having a permeability of about 40 to about 60, and the third material 100 may also comprise a ferrite material or combinations thereof, as previously mentioned. In one or more embodiments, the first 96, second 98, or third 100 materials may comprise a permeability greater than 40. More preferably, the first 96, second 98, or third 100 materials may comprise a permeability greater than 100. The magnetic flux saturation density (Bsat) is at least 380 mT.
In one or more embodiments, the various magnetic shielding materials 34 and structures could be used to create a hybrid magnetic shielding embodiment. In a hybrid magnetic shielding embodiment, various ferrite materials are strategically positioned to improve the performance of the multiple inductor coils 20, 54 which resonate at differing frequencies. Thus, the ferrite materials are positioned to enhance the operation of the transmitting or receiving antenna 10, 12. For example, utilizing a ferrite material having an increased permeability of about 100 to 120, such as the FFSX series material may be used to optimally shield a coil resonating at 6.78 MHz without degrading the performance of another coil resonating at a lower frequency range of 100 kHz to about 500 kHz. Likewise, utilization of a ferrite material having a lower permeability such as from about 40 to about 60, like the RFIC material, is preferred because it enhances the operation of a coil 20, 54 resonating in the lower kHz frequency region without degrading the performance of an inductor coil 20, 54 resonating in the MHz frequency range.
In addition to the specific ferrite material, the positioning of the ferrite material is also important to the optimal operation of the antenna of the present disclosure. For example with reference to
In addition to utilizing three ferrite materials as previously discussed, it is contemplated that mixtures or compounds of various ferrite materials may be used to further custom tailor the desired permeability. Furthermore, the various layers may be composed of ferrite material mixtures and alloys. It is also noted that
In one or more embodiments, the electrically conductive substrate 24 comprising the at least one cut-out 30 and slit 32 of the present disclosure may serve as a casing, enclosure or backing such as a sidewall of a device 22 that at least partially encases the electrical components and circuitry of an electronic device 22. Alternatively, the electrically conductive substrate 24 comprising the at least one cut-out 30 and slit 32 may be positioned internal to an electronic device 22.
In one or more embodiments, a perimeter 108 of the cut-out 30 (
The primary objective of the at least one slit 32 is to prevent the formation of an eddy current loop on the surface of the electrically conductive substrate 24. Preventing the formation of the eddy current loop on the surface of the electrically conductive substrate 24 prevents the formation of the eddy current secondary magnetic field 18 which opposes the incident magnetic field 14 from the transmitting antenna 10 which disrupts the wireless transmission of the electrical energy via NFMC. In one or more embodiments, the at least one slit 32 extends through the edge 46 of the electrically conductive substrate 24 and “cuts” the eddy current loop, thereby preventing formation of the eddy current secondary magnetic field 18 in opposition to the incident magnetic field 14.
In addition to designing the electrically conductive substrate 24 with either a cut-out 30 or a slit 32, the metallic substrate 24 may be designed with a combination of at least one cut-out 30 and at least one slit 32.
In either case, in one or more embodiments, the electrically conductive substrate 24 may be configured to have an “area” that is 80 percent or greater. As defined herein, “area” is the remaining surface area, in percent, of the metallic substrate 24 after the substrate 24 has been configured with the cut-out and/or slit pattern. “Area” is calculated by subtracting the percent surface area of the cut-out and/or slit pattern from the total surface area of the metallic substrate 24. For example, if a cut-out pattern comprises 10 percent of the total surface area of the metallic substrate 24 then the “area” is 90 percent (100% of the metallic surface area-10% of the surface area of the cut-out configuration). In one or more embodiments, an area that is 80 percent or greater mitigates the eddy current magnetic field by reducing the flux of the eddy current magnetic field in the cut-out/slit area. Also, an area that is 80 percent or greater increases the magnetic flux of the incident magnetic field 14 emanating from the transmitting antenna 10 in the cut-out area of the electrically conductive substrate 24 positioned in parallel to the coil 54 of the receiving antenna 12, thereby increasing mutual inductance between the transmitting and receiving antennas 10, 12.
In one or more embodiments, various electrical performance parameters were measured in which the electrically conductive substrate 24, comprising various cut-out and slit patterns, were incorporated with a receiving antenna 12. One electrical parameter is quality factor (Q) defined below. The quality factor of a coil defined as:
Where:
Another performance parameter is resistance of receiver antenna efficiency (RCE) which is coil to coil efficiency. RCE is defined as:
Where:
Another performance parameter is mutual induction (M). “M” is the mutual inductance between two opposing inductor coils of a transmitting and receiving antenna, respectively. Mutual induction (M) is defined as:
Where:
Mutual inductance can be calculated by the following relationship:
M=k*√{square root over (LTx*LRx)}
Where:
Another performance parameter is figure of merit (FOM). “FOM” is a quotient that indicates the efficiency of wireless electrical energy between two opposing inductor coils of a transmitting and receiving antenna, respectively. Figure of Merit (FOM) is defined as:
FOM=k2QrxQtx
Where:
The parameter of “effective area” is defined as the ratio of the area of the inductor coil that is not covered by the electrically conductive substrate comprising the at least one cut-out and slit. “Effective area” is defined as:
The parameter of “Area” is defined as the ratio of the combined surface area of the at least one cutout and slit within the electrically conductive substrate to the surface area of the electrically conductive substrate without the at least one cutout and slit. “Area” is defined as:
Where:
Table I above details various measured performance parameters of an NFMC system comprising a transmitting antenna 10 and a receiving antenna 12. A transmitting antenna 10 comprising an NC3-A Airfuel certified resonant transmitting inductor coil 20 was used in the performance testing as detailed in configurations 1-7 shown in Table I. The transmitting antenna 10 was configured having a solenoidal inductor coil with a length of 170 mm and a width of 105 mm and 6 turns. The receiving antenna 12 comprised a receiving inductor coil 54 having 8 number of turns. The receiving inductor coil 54 was configured having a diameter of 34 mm. Test configuration 1 comprised only the receiving antenna 12 with the receiving coil 54. Test configuration 2 comprised the receiving antenna 12 with the receiving coil 54 positioned on Kitagawa FFSX ferrite material having a loss tangent of 110 and a thickness of 0.3 mm that served as a magnetic field shield. In test configuration 3, the receiving antenna 12 comprised a copper substrate having a thickness of 0.055 mm positioned in contact with the side of the ferrite material opposite the side that supported the receiving inductor coil 54 used in test configuration 2. Test configuration 4 comprised the receiving antenna 12 of test configuration 3 with the addition of an electrically conductive substrate 24 composed of copper with a thickness of 0.5 mm positioned proximal and parallel to the receiving coil 54. It is noted that the electrically conductive substrate 24 in test configuration 4, did not comprise an opening through its thickness. A gap of 0.01 mm separated the electrically conductive substrate 24 from the receiving coil 54. The electrically conductive substrate 24 simulated a metal cover of an electronic device such as a cellular phone. Test configuration 5 comprised the previous test configuration 4 with the addition of the electrically conductive substrate 24 having a circular cut-out 30 with a diameter of 21 mm extending through its thickness as illustrated in
It is noted that the inductance values detailed in Table I were measured inductance values of the receiving antenna in free space measured with an Agilent 4294A precision impedance analyzer at an operating frequency of 6.78 MHz. The equivalent series resistance (ESR) values in Table I list the measured ESR values of the receiving antenna in free space measured with an Agilent 4294A precision impedance analyzer at an operating frequency of 6.78 MHz. The quality factor values listed in Table I were of the receiving antenna 12 at an operating frequency of 6.78 MHz.
As shown in Table I above, positioning an electrically conductive substrate 24, such as a metal cover, in front of the receiving coil 54 of the receiving antenna 12, as tested in configuration 4, significantly reduced the inductance and quality factor. In addition, equivalent series resistance (ESR) increased in comparison to test configuration 1 comprising only the receiving antenna 12. This increase in ESR and reduction in inductance and quality factor is the result of the formation of the opposing secondary magnetic field 18 created by the eddy current on the surface of the electrically conductive substrate 24 as previously discussed.
Table II above details the measured performance parameters of a near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) system comprising a transmitting antenna 10 and a receiving antenna 12. In one or more embodiments, a metallic substrate 24 configured with various cut-out and slit patterns, as detailed in Table II above was positioned in parallel with a receiving antenna coil 54 such that the substrate 24 was positioned between the receiving coil 54 of the receiving antenna 12 and the transmitting antenna 10.
In one or more embodiments, the transmitting antenna 10 for all test Nos. 1-16, comprised an NC3-A Airfuel certified resonant transmitting coil. The transmitting antenna 10 was configured having a solenoidal inductor coil with a length of 170 mm and a width of 105 mm and 6 turns. It is noted that the “outer coil” configuration, test No. 1, detailed in Table II above, comprised only a receiving antenna 12 having a receiving coil 54 with a length of 73 mm, a width of 55 mm and 5 turns. The “inner and outer coil” configuration, test No. 2, detailed in Table II above comprised a receiving antenna 12 with only an outer coil having a length of 73 mm, a width of 55 mm and 5 turns and an inner coil electrically connected in series to the outer coil. The inner coil was configured having a diameter of 34 mm and 10 turns. Test Nos. 3-8 comprised a receiving antenna 12 configured with an outer coil having a length of 73 mm, a width of 55 mm and 5 turns. Test Nos. 9-16 comprised a receiving antenna 12 configured with an outer coil having a length of 73 mm, a width of 55 mm with 5 turns and an inner coil electrically connected in series to the outer coil. The inner coil was configured having a diameter of 66 mm and 5 turns. The receiving antenna 12 of Test Nos. 3-16 also comprised a copper backing substrate and Kitagawa Industries' FFSX ferrite material having a loss tangent of about 110 that served as a magnetic field shield. The ferrite material served as the substrate on which the receiving coil 54 was positioned. The copper backing substrate was positioned in contact with the ferrite material opposite the side supporting the receiving inductor coil 54. The ferrite material had a thickness of 0.35 mm, and the copper backing substrate had a thickness of 0.055 mm.
A copper substrate 24 having a thickness of about 0.5 mm configured with various cut-out and slit patterns correlating to the figure number, shown in Table II was positioned proximal to the receiving coil 54. More specifically, the metallic substrate 24 configured with the cutout and/or slit pattern was positioned proximal and oriented in parallel to the inductor receiving coil 54. In addition, configurations of Test Nos. 3-16 comprising a metallic substrate 24 having a cut-out 30, the perimeter 108 of the cut-out 30 was positioned in alignment with the inner diameter of the inner receiving inductor coil 84 of the receiving antenna 12.
It is noted that the inductance values detailed in Table II were the measured inductance values of the receiving antenna 12 in free space at an operating frequency of 6.78 MHz. The equivalent series resistance (ESR) values detailed in Table II were the measured ESR values of the receiving antenna 12 in free space at an operating frequency of 6.78 MHz. The quality factor values listed in Table II were of the receiving antenna at an operating frequency of 6.78 MHz. The inductance and ESR values were measured with an Agilent 4294A precision impedance analyzer. It is also noted that the symbol “-” indicates that a measurement was not taken.
As detailed in Table II, utilization of the metallic substrate 24 configured with the cut-out and slit pattern shown in
Table III above illustrates how the size of the gap 56 between the electrically conductive substrate 24, comprising the at least one cut-out 30 and slit 32, and the inductor coil 54 of the receiving antenna 12 affects RCE between the transmitting and receiving antennas 10, 12. In one or more embodiments, the transmitting antenna 10 comprised an NC3-A Airfuel certified resonant transmitting coil. The transmitting antenna 10 was configured having a solenoidal inductor coil with a length of 170 mm and a width of 105 mm and 6 turns. The receiving coil 54 was configured having a coil with a diameter of 34 mm with 8 turns.
The receiving antenna 12 also comprised a copper backing substrate and FFSX-3 ferrite material having a loss tangent of 110 that served both as the substrate supporting the receiving coil 54 and magnetic field shield. The copper substrate was positioned in contact with the side of the ferrite material opposite the side supporting the receiving coil configuration. The ferrite material had a thickness of 0.35 mm, and the copper backing substrate had a thickness of 0.055 mm. A plastic spacer 68 was positioned between the electrically conductive substrate 24 comprising the cutout/slit pattern, as illustrated in
As indicated in Table III above, the RCE between the transmitting antenna 10 and the receiving antenna 12 increases as the gap 56 between the electrically conductive substrate 24 comprising the cut-out/slit pattern and the receiving antenna coil 54 decreases. As shown, the RCE increased from about 87 percent to about 92 percent as the gap 56 between the receiving coil 54 and metallic substrate 24 decreased from about 1 mm to about 0 mm.
In addition, as illustrated in
Thus, it is contemplated that the electrically conductive substrate 24 of the present disclosure is capable of being configured having a variety of unlimited cut-out and/or slit patterns. Furthermore, such a configuration of the variety of unlimited cut-out and/or slit patterns allows for and significantly improves the wireless transmission of electrical energy through an electrically conductive material. It is further contemplated that the various magnetic shielding materials 34 can be strategically positioned adjacent to the antenna 10, 12 and the electrically conductive substrate 24 configured with the various cut-out and/or slit patterns to enhance quality factor and mutual inductance between adjacently positioned transmitting and receiving antennas 10, 12. It is appreciated that various modifications to the inventive concepts described herein may be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
As used herein, the phrase “at least one of” preceding a series of items, with the term “and” or “or” to separate any of the items, modifies the list as a whole, rather than each member of the list (i.e., each item). The phrase “at least one of” does not require selection of at least one of each item listed; rather, the phrase allows a meaning that includes at least one of any one of the items, and/or at least one of any combination of the items, and/or at least one of each of the items. By way of example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C” or “at least one of A, B, or C” each refer to only A, only B, or only C; any combination of A, B, and C; and/or at least one of each of A, B, and C.
The predicate words “configured to”, “operable to”, and “programmed to” do not imply any particular tangible or intangible modification of a subject, but, rather, are intended to be used interchangeably. In one or more embodiments, a processor configured to monitor and control an operation or a component may also mean the processor being programmed to monitor and control the operation or the processor being operable to monitor and control the operation. Likewise, a processor configured to execute code can be construed as a processor programmed to execute code or operable to execute code.
A phrase such as “an aspect” does not imply that such aspect is essential to the subject technology or that such aspect applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an aspect may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. An aspect may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as an “aspect” may refer to one or more aspects and vice versa. A phrase such as an “embodiment” does not imply that such embodiment is essential to the subject technology or that such embodiment applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an embodiment may apply to all embodiments, or one or more embodiments. An embodiment may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such an “embodiment” may refer to one or more embodiments and vice versa. A phrase such as a “configuration” does not imply that such configuration is essential to the subject technology or that such configuration applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to a configuration may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A configuration may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as a “configuration” may refer to one or more configurations and vice versa.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” or as an “example” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various aspects described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”
Reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” Unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “some” refers to one or more. Pronouns in the masculine (e.g., his) include the feminine and neuter gender (e.g., her and its) and vice versa. Headings and subheadings, if any, are used for convenience only and do not limit the subject disclosure.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of particular implementations of the subject matter. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub combination or variation of a sub combination.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/432,320, filed on Dec. 9, 2016, the disclosure of which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2797393 | Clogston | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2911605 | Wales, Jr. | Nov 1959 | A |
| 3484731 | Rich | Dec 1969 | A |
| 4328531 | Shinagawa | May 1982 | A |
| 4494100 | Nejdl | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4959631 | Sahashi | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4996165 | Asbeck | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5137478 | Graf | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5237165 | Tingley, III | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5604352 | Schuetz | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5713939 | Nedungadi | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5748464 | Schuetz | May 1998 | A |
| 5767808 | Skogland | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767813 | Yao | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777538 | Schuetz | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5801611 | Waanders | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808587 | Shima | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5838154 | Nishibe | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5883392 | Schuetz | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892489 | Mandai | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5980773 | Takeda | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005193 | Markel | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021337 | Hodge | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028568 | Mandai | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6107972 | Seward | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6148221 | Hidaka | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163307 | Park | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6271803 | Kanba | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6503831 | Speakman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6556101 | Tada | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6583769 | Asakura | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6664863 | Ikeda | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6809688 | Yamada | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6897830 | Bae et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6924230 | Sheu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7046113 | Ikeda | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7205655 | Sippola | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7355558 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7563352 | Hubel | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7579835 | Schnell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7579836 | Schnell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7713762 | Lee | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7786836 | Gabara | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7952365 | Kushta | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7962186 | Cui et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8056819 | Rowell | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8299877 | Hong | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8436780 | Compston | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8567048 | Babcock | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8610530 | Singh | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8653927 | Singh | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8680960 | Singh | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8692641 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8692642 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698590 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698591 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8707546 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8710948 | Singh | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8774712 | Sato | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8803649 | Singh | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8823481 | Singh | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8823482 | Singh | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855786 | Derbas | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8860545 | Singh | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8898885 | Babcock | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9178369 | Partovi | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9208942 | Frysz | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9559526 | Von Novak | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9912173 | Tseng | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 20020020554 | Sakamoto | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053992 | Kawakami | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071003 | Kimura | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075191 | Yokoshima | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101383 | Junod | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105080 | Speakman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030006069 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058180 | Forster | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119677 | Gao | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040000974 | Odenaal | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085247 | Capelli | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040108311 | De Rooij | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118920 | He | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140528 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159460 | Passiopoulos | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189528 | Delgado | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217488 | Luechinger | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227608 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050121229 | Sueyoshi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174628 | Zhang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060022772 | Kanno | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040628 | Porret | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060192645 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284718 | Benetik | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070018767 | Gabara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070020969 | Yungers | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023424 | Weber | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045773 | Mizuno | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046544 | Sano | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095913 | Takahashi | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120629 | Schnell | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179570 | De Taboada | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182367 | Partovi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070267718 | Lee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279287 | Castaneda | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080039332 | Touitou | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080055178 | Kim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062066 | Arai | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080067874 | Tseng | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150693 | You | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164840 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164844 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164960 | Schnell | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211320 | Secall | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277386 | Haimer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283277 | Kusama | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303735 | Fukimoto | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015266 | Narita | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079268 | Cook | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079628 | Rofougaran | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085706 | Duckworth | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096413 | Partovi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090108974 | Raggam | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134875 | Tomiha | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140691 | Jung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090152542 | Leung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090230777 | Baarman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261778 | Kook | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261936 | Sarangan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100033290 | Frye | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100072588 | Yang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100127660 | Widmer | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141042 | Giler | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164296 | Soljacic | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100219694 | Kurs et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289599 | Vangala | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289709 | Guan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295701 | Cazenave | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110024510 | Ishino | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110084656 | Gao | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110101788 | Sun et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137379 | Wosmek | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241437 | Kanno | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248891 | Park | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279198 | Haner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120062345 | Kurs | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120095531 | Derbas | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120169434 | Mori | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120217819 | Yamakawa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235500 | Schatz | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235634 | Kulikowski | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235636 | Partovi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249396 | Parsche | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120274148 | Sung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280765 | Soljacic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120326931 | Kato | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130067737 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067738 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068499 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068507 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069748 | Frysz | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069749 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069750 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069843 | Frysz | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130076154 | Baarman | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130146671 | Woerle | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199027 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199028 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200070 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200722 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200968 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200969 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200976 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201589 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130205582 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207744 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208389 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208390 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257362 | Lim | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130300207 | Wang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140008974 | Miyamoto | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140028111 | Hansen | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035383 | Riehl | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035793 | Ozawa | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140041218 | Signh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047713 | Derbas | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140084946 | Gadot | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168019 | Uejima | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140183971 | Endo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197694 | Asanuma et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140231518 | Yosui | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266019 | Pigott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361628 | Keeling | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150054455 | Kim | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150091502 | Mukherjee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150115727 | Carobolante et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136858 | Finn | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150137746 | Lee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150140807 | Mohammed | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145634 | Kurz | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145635 | Duetsch | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150180440 | Ishizuka | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207541 | Kuroda | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236545 | Hyun | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150280322 | Saito | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150318710 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150357827 | Muratov et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029266 | Choi-Grogan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160056664 | Partovi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160118711 | Ummenhofer | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160126002 | Chen | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160149416 | Ha et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156103 | Hyun | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156215 | Bae | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160224975 | Na | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160292669 | Tunnell | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170126544 | Vigneras et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20180166921 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167107 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167108 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167109 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167110 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180168057 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180212649 | Tenno | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2650300 | Oct 2004 | CN |
| 104037493 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104037494 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 0310396 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 1609503 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 2031729 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2775564 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| 2775565 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| 1-310518 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| 5-83249 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| 09-093005 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 10-255629 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 2001344574 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2007-7042569 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2008-160781 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008-205215 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2008-307114 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2008-924285 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2012-147408 | Aug 2012 | JP |
| 2013-93429 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2014-175864 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 2014-175865 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 10-20100092741 | Aug 2010 | KR |
| 10-2013-0015618 | Feb 2013 | KR |
| 10-2014-0111554 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 10-2014-0111794 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 2014-0135357 | Nov 2014 | KR |
| 10-1559939 | Oct 2015 | KR |
| 201436494 | Sep 2014 | TW |
| 201436495 | Sep 2014 | TW |
| 2008050917 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2010104569 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| EP Search Report 10751119.8. |
| EP Search Report 13001121.6. |
| EP Search Report 13001130.7. |
| EP Search Report 14000885.5. |
| Relative Permativity—Dielectric Constant—Jul. 2011 (3 pages). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 13 001 130.7 (6 pages). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 13 001 121.6 (6 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047049 (5 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017 in corresponding EP Application No. 14000885.5 (4 pages). |
| Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2017 in corresponding TW Application No. 102108342 (10 pages). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047048 (12 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2016 for PCT/US2016/045588 (10 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2016 for PCT/US2016/047607 (9 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated issued in PCT/US2017/048708 dated Nov. 8, 2017 (10 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated Dec. 12, 2017 (11 pages). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8 (10 pages). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X (10 pages). |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated May 8, 2018 (2 pages). |
| Decision of Dismissal of Amendment issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated May 8, 2018 (7 pages). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2018 in corresponding TW Application No. 102108345 (11 pages). |
| Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047049 (5 pages). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2017 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X (10 pages). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2017 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8 (10 pages). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8 (9 pages). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X (10 pages). |
| Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2018 in corresponding KR Application No. 10-2013-0026135 (12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2018 in corresponding KR Application No. 10-2013-0025858 (12 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2017/048708 dated Nov. 8, 2017 (10 pages). |
| Written Opinion and International Search Report issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/065329 dated Feb. 21, 2018 (7 pages). |
| EP Office Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Jan. 17, 2019 for EP App. No. 13001121-1216. |
| EP Communication pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC regarding partial supplementary European Search Report for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212 dated Feb. 14, 2019, 20 pages. |
| Muratov, V., Multi-Mode Wireless Power Systems can be a bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless charging, Mediatek, Inc., Nov. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
| Qi 2010, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1, Oct. 2010, Wireless Power Consortium, 86 pages. |
| Narayanan, R., “Wireless Power Charging Coil Changing Considerations”, Wurth Elektronik, Feb. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Barcelo, T., “Wireless Power User Guide”, Linear Technology, Application Note 138, Oct. 2013, 8 pages. |
| Yoon, Y., “Embedded conductor technology for micromachined RF elements”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Jun. 2005, 11 pages. |
| Burghartz, J., “On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 2003, pp. 718-729. |
| Qi 2009, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Version 0.95, Jul. 2009, 76 pages. |
| Lee, Y., “Antenna Circuit Design for RFID Applications”, 2003 Microchip Technology, AN710, 50 pages. |
| Sun, M., et al., “Apparatus for Wireless Power and Data Transfer Over a Distance”, University of Pittsburgh, Jun. 2009, 30 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., 90 pages. |
| Ex 1009—US20090096413 to Partovi, 88 pages. |
| Ex 1010—IEEE Dictionary 1996 (excerpt), 9 pages. |
| Ex 1006—Semat—Physics Chapters 29-32, 81 pages, (1958). |
| Ex 1004—File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, 201 pages. (in two attachments due to size). |
| Ex. 1011—US20070089773A1 to Koester et al., 26 pages. |
| Ex. 1003—CV of Dr. Steven B. Leeb, 7 pages. |
| Ex. 1005—US20070267718A1 to Lee, 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1039—Lopera et al., “A Multiwinding Modeling Method for High Frequency Transformers and Inductors”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 18, No. 3, May 2003, 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1036 KKraemer et al., “Architecture Considerations for 60 GhzPulse Transceiver Front-Ends,” CAS 2007 Proceedings vol. 2, 2007, Int'l Semiconductor Conference (2007), 26 pages. |
| Ex. 1015 Reinhold—Efficient Antenna Design of Inductive Coupled RFID—Systems with High Power Demand, Journal of Communication vol. 2, No. 6, Nov. 2007, 10 pages. |
| Ex. 1037—Varonen et al., “V-band Balanced Resistive Mixer in 65-nm CMOS,” Proceedings of the 33rd European Solid-State Circuits Conference (2007), 22 pages. |
| Ex. 1018—Wheeler, Formulas for the Skin (1942), 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1035—IEEE Xplore web page, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1031 Ahn 7305725, 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1020 Alldred et al., “A 1.2 V, 60 Ghz radio receiver with onchip transformers and inductors in 90 nm CMOS,” Proc. IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuits SYmp., pp_ 51-54, Nov. 2006 (“Alldred”), 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1025—US20070126544—Wotherspoon, 6 pages. |
| Ex. 1019—Kyriazidou—7236080, 12 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 87 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 322 pages (in two attachments A and B) due to size. |
| Ex. 1033—Hu, et al., “AC Resistance to Planar Power Inductors and the Quasidistributed Gap Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 4, Jul. 2001 (“Hu”), 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1038—IEEE Xplore web page, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1017—U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,344 to Balakrishnan, 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1040—Leonavicius et al., “Comparison of Realization Techniques for PFC Inductor Operating in Discontinuous Conduction Mode,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 2, Mar. 2004, 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1041—Roshen, W.A., “Fringing Field Formulas and Winding Loss Due to an Air Gap,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 8, Aug. 2007, 12 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, 86 pages. |
| Ex. 1022 U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 to Tseng, 31 pages. |
| Ex. 1023 U.S. Pat. No. 7,248,138 to Chiang, 18 pages. |
| Ex. 1024 U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,958 to Yerman et al., 20 pages. |
| Ex. 1028—U.S. Pat. No. 9,820,374 to Bois et al., 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 7,601,919 to Phan et al., 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1030 U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,825 to Wojnarowski et al., 10 pages. |
| Ex. 1032—U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,331 to Shamouilian et al., 23 pages. |
| Ex. 1034—U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,363 to Fazelpour, 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1001—US868960 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
| IPR2019-00861—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 89 pages. |
| IPR2019-00862—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948, 88 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
| Ex. 1004 File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., 213 pages. |
| IPR2019-0863 Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 89 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 49 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 180 pages. |
| Ex. 1002 Declaration of Dr. Steven Leeb, 115 pages. |
| Ex. 1012—US20120280765 to Kurs, 122 pages. |
| Ex. 1013—U.S. Pat. No. 6,432,497 to Bunyan, 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1014 U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,842 to Cheung et al., 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1016 U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,042 to Akiba et al., 8 pages. |
| EP Communication pursuant to Rule 62 EPC regarding extended European Search Report for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212 dated May 15, 2019, 16 pages. |
| Notification of Decision of Rejection for KR App. No. 10-2013-0025858 dated May 14, 2019, English Translation, 4 pages. |
| Notification of Decision of Rejection for KR 10-2013-0026135 dated May 14, 2019, 8 pages with translation. |
| EP Communication of extended European Search Report for EP 19154162.2 dated Jun. 12, 2019, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180167109 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62432320 | Dec 2016 | US |
