The present invention relates to electronic devices such as OLEDs and, more specifically, to devices and techniques for fabricating devices having improved shelf lives and mechanical integrity.
Opto-electronic devices that make use of organic materials are becoming increasingly desirable for a number of reasons. Many of the materials used to make such devices are relatively inexpensive, so organic opto-electronic devices have the potential for cost advantages over inorganic devices. In addition, the inherent properties of organic materials, such as their flexibility, may make them well suited for particular applications such as fabrication on a flexible substrate. Examples of organic opto-electronic devices include organic light emitting devices (OLEDs), organic phototransistors, organic photovoltaic cells, and organic photodetectors. For OLEDs, the organic materials may have performance advantages over conventional materials. For example, the wavelength at which an organic emissive layer emits light may generally be readily tuned with appropriate dopants.
OLEDs make use of thin organic films that emit light when voltage is applied across the device. OLEDs are becoming an increasingly interesting technology for use in applications such as flat panel displays, illumination, and backlighting. Several OLED materials and configurations are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,844,363, 6,303,238, and 5,707,745, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
One application for phosphorescent emissive molecules is a full color display. Industry standards for such a display call for pixels adapted to emit particular colors, referred to as “saturated” colors. In particular, these standards call for saturated red, green, and blue pixels. Color may be measured using CIE coordinates, which are well known to the art.
One example of a green emissive molecule is tris(2-phenylpyridine) iridium, denoted Ir(ppy)3, which has the following structure:
In this, and later figures herein, we depict the dative bond from nitrogen to metal (here, Ir) as a straight line.
As used herein, the term “organic” includes polymeric materials as well as small molecule organic materials that may be used to fabricate organic opto-electronic devices. “Small molecule” refers to any organic material that is not a polymer, and “small molecules” may actually be quite large. Small molecules may include repeat units in some circumstances. For example, using a long chain alkyl group as a substituent does not remove a molecule from the “small molecule” class. Small molecules may also be incorporated into polymers, for example as a pendent group on a polymer backbone or as a part of the backbone. Small molecules may also serve as the core moiety of a dendrimer, which consists of a series of chemical shells built on the core moiety. The core moiety of a dendrimer may be a fluorescent or phosphorescent small molecule emitter. A dendrimer may be a “small molecule,” and it is believed that all dendrimers currently used in the field of OLEDs are small molecules.
As used herein, “top” means furthest away from the substrate, while “bottom” means closest to the substrate. Where a first layer is described as “disposed over” a second layer, the first layer is disposed further away from substrate. There may be other layers between the first and second layer, unless it is specified that the first layer is “in contact with” the second layer. For example, a cathode may be described as “disposed over” an anode, even though there are various organic layers in between.
As used herein, “solution processible” means capable of being dissolved, dispersed, or transported in and/or deposited from a liquid medium, either in solution or suspension form.
A ligand may be referred to as “photoactive” when it is believed that the ligand directly contributes to the photoactive properties of an emissive material. A ligand may be referred to as “ancillary” when it is believed that the ligand does not contribute to the photoactive properties of an emissive material, although an ancillary ligand may alter the properties of a photoactive ligand.
As used herein, and as would be generally understood by one skilled in the art, a first “Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital” (HOMO) or “Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital” (LUMO) energy level is “greater than” or “higher than” a second HOMO or LUMO energy level if the first energy level is closer to the vacuum energy level. Since ionization potentials (IP) are measured as a negative energy relative to a vacuum level, a higher HOMO energy level corresponds to an IP having a smaller absolute value (an IP that is less negative). Similarly, a higher LUMO energy level corresponds to an electron affinity (EA) having a smaller absolute value (an EA that is less negative). On a conventional energy level diagram, with the vacuum level at the top, the LUMO energy level of a material is higher than the HOMO energy level of the same material. A “higher” HOMO or LUMO energy level appears closer to the top of such a diagram than a “lower” HOMO or LUMO energy level.
As used herein, and as would be generally understood by one skilled in the art, a first work function is “greater than” or “higher than” a second work function if the first work function has a higher absolute value. Because work functions are generally measured as negative numbers relative to vacuum level, this means that a “higher” work function is more negative. On a conventional energy level diagram, with the vacuum level at the top, a “higher” work function is illustrated as further away from the vacuum level in the downward direction. Thus, the definitions of HOMO and LUMO energy levels follow a different convention than work functions.
More details on OLEDs, and the definitions described above, can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,279,704, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Embodiments of the invention provide electronic devices such as OLEDs that include a topographically non-planar layer that prevents or reduces the spread of delamination regions within the device. In an embodiment, a device includes a substrate, a first electrode disposed over the substrate, an organic emissive layer disposed over the first electrode, a second electrode disposed over the organic emissive layer, a barrier film disposed over the first electrode, the organic emissive layer, and the second electrode, and which is in conformal contact with a layer immediately below the barrier film, and a topographically non-planar layer disposed between the substrate and the barrier film. The non-planar layer may be disposed between the anode and the organic emissive layer, between the substrate and the organic emissive layer, adjacent to the organic emissive layer, adjacent to the first electrode, immediately over the substrate, and/or at other locations within the device. It may be a physically distinct and separate layer, or it may be physically integral with another layer, such as where physical features extend from another layer such as a substrate. It also may be formed by one or more grooves within an existing layer, such as a substrate. Each layer disposed over the non-planar layer may topographically follow the contour of the non-planar layer. In a specific arrangement, the device may include a substrate; an anode disposed over the substrate; a topographically non-planar layer disposed over the anode; an organic emissive layer disposed over the non-planar layer; a cathode disposed over the organic emissive layer; and a barrier film disposed over and in conformal contact with the cathode.
In an embodiment, the organic emissive layer may include a plurality of pixels. The non-planar layer may physically separate individual pixels within the organic emissive layer. The non-planar layer may include a grid or similar structure. The non-planar layer may include various materials such as metals, organics, and/or inorganics. The organic emissive layer may be a blanket layer or it may include multiple, distinct regions such as pixels.
In an embodiment, the non-planar layer may include a topographical non-uniformity having an upper portion that extends over and beyond a lower portion. The barrier film, organic layer, and/or other layers may conformally coat the topographical non-uniformity, such as where the layer is disposed directly over the non-uniformity, and/or it may follow the contour of the non-uniformity, such as where intervening layers are disposed between the layer and the non-uniformity. One or more regions under the upper portion of the topographical non-uniformity may remain unfilled by layers disposed over the non-uniformity, such as thin film barriers, organic emissive layers, and the like.
Generally, an OLED comprises at least one organic layer disposed between and electrically connected to an anode and a cathode. When a current is applied, the anode injects holes and the cathode injects electrons into the organic layer(s). The injected holes and electrons each migrate toward the oppositely charged electrode. When an electron and hole localize on the same molecule, an “exciton,” which is a localized electron-hole pair having an excited energy state, is formed. Light is emitted when the exciton relaxes via a photoemissive mechanism. In some cases, the exciton may be localized on an excimer or an exciplex. Non-radiative mechanisms, such as thermal relaxation, may also occur, but are generally considered undesirable.
The initial OLEDs used emissive molecules that emitted light from their singlet states (“fluorescence”) as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,769,292, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Fluorescent emission generally occurs in a time frame of less than 10 nanoseconds.
More recently, OLEDs having emissive materials that emit light from triplet states (“phosphorescence”) have been demonstrated. Baldo et al., “Highly Efficient Phosphorescent Emission from Organic Electroluminescent Devices,” Nature, vol. 395, 151-154, 1998; (“Baldo-I”) and Baldo et al., “Very high-efficiency green organic light-emitting devices based on electrophosphorescence,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 75, No. 3, 4-6 (1999) (“Baldo-II”), which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. Phosphorescence is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,279,704 at cols. 5-6, which are incorporated by reference.
More examples for each of these layers are available. For example, a flexible and transparent substrate-anode combination is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,844,363, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. An example of a p-doped hole transport layer is m-MTDATA doped with F4-TCNQ at a molar ratio of 50:1, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0230980, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Examples of emissive and host materials are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,303,238 to Thompson et al., which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. An example of an n-doped electron transport layer is BPhen doped with Li at a molar ratio of 1:1, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0230980, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,703,436 and 5,707,745, which are incorporated by reference in their entireties, disclose examples of cathodes including compound cathodes having a thin layer of metal such as Mg:Ag with an overlying transparent, electrically-conductive, sputter-deposited ITO layer. The theory and use of blocking layers is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,097,147 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0230980, which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. Examples of injection layers are provided in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0174116, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. A description of protective layers may be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0174116, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The simple layered structure illustrated in
Structures and materials not specifically described may also be used, such as OLEDs comprised of polymeric materials (PLEDs) such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,247,190 to Friend et al., which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. By way of further example, OLEDs having a single organic layer may be used. OLEDs may be stacked, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,707,745 to Forrest et al, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The OLED structure may deviate from the simple layered structure illustrated in
Unless otherwise specified, any of the layers of the various embodiments may be deposited by any suitable method. For the organic layers, preferred methods include thermal evaporation, ink-jet, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,013,982 and 6,087,196, which are incorporated by reference in their entireties, organic vapor phase deposition (OVPD), such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,337,102 to Forrest et al., which is incorporated by reference in its entirety, and deposition by organic vapor jet printing (OVJP), such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,431,968, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Other suitable deposition methods include spin coating and other solution based processes. Solution based processes are preferably carried out in nitrogen or an inert atmosphere. For the other layers, preferred methods include thermal evaporation. Preferred patterning methods include deposition through a mask, cold welding such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,294,398 and 6,468,819, which are incorporated by reference in their entireties, and patterning associated with some of the deposition methods such as ink-jet and OVJP. Other methods may also be used. The materials to be deposited may be modified to make them compatible with a particular deposition method. For example, substituents such as alkyl and aryl groups, branched or unbranched, and preferably containing at least 3 carbons, may be used in small molecules to enhance their ability to undergo solution processing. Substituents having 20 carbons or more may be used, and 3-20 carbons is a preferred range. Materials with asymmetric structures may have better solution processibility than those having symmetric structures, because asymmetric materials may have a lower tendency to recrystallize. Dendrimer substituents may be used to enhance the ability of small molecules to undergo solution processing.
Devices fabricated in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may further optionally comprise a barrier layer. One purpose of the barrier layer is to protect the electrodes and organic layers from damaging exposure to harmful species in the environment including moisture, vapor and/or gases, etc. The barrier layer may be deposited over, under or next to a substrate, an electrode, or over any other parts of a device including an edge. The barrier layer may comprise a single layer, or multiple layers. The barrier layer may be formed by various known chemical vapor deposition techniques and may include compositions having a single phase as well as compositions having multiple phases. Any suitable material or combination of materials may be used for the barrier layer. The barrier layer may incorporate an inorganic or an organic compound or both. The preferred barrier layer comprises a mixture of a polymeric material and a non-polymeric material as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,968,146, PCT Pat. Application Nos. PCT/US2007/023098 and PCT/US2009/042829, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties. To be considered a “mixture”, the aforesaid polymeric and non-polymeric materials comprising the barrier layer should be deposited under the same reaction conditions and/or at the same time. The weight ratio of polymeric to non-polymeric material may be in the range of 95:5 to 5:95. The polymeric material and the non-polymeric material may be created from the same precursor material. In one example, the mixture of a polymeric material and a non-polymeric material consists essentially of polymeric silicon and inorganic silicon.
Devices fabricated in accordance with embodiments of the invention may be incorporated into a wide variety of consumer products, including flat panel displays, computer monitors, medical monitors, televisions, billboards, lights for interior or exterior illumination and/or signaling, heads up displays, fully transparent displays, flexible displays, laser printers, telephones, cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, digital cameras, camcorders, viewfinders, micro-displays, 3-D displays, vehicles, a large area wall, theater or stadium screen, or a sign. Various control mechanisms may be used to control devices fabricated in accordance with the present invention, including passive matrix and active matrix. Many of the devices are intended for use in a temperature range comfortable to humans, such as 18 degrees C. to 30 degrees C., and more preferably at room temperature (20-25 degrees C.), but could be used outside this temperature range, for example, from −40 degree C. to +80 degree C.
The materials and structures described herein may have applications in devices other than OLEDs. For example, other optoelectronic devices such as organic solar cells and organic photodetectors may employ the materials and structures. More generally, organic devices, such as organic transistors, may employ the materials and structures.
The terms halo, halogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aralkyl, heterocyclic group, aryl, aromatic group, and heteroaryl are known to the art, and are defined in U.S. Pat. No. 7,279,704 at cols. 31-32, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Electronic devices that are sensitive to atmospheric gases, such as OLEDs, often may degrade upon storage via formation of dark spots in the active device area. These dark spots typically are caused by either formation of an insulating layer at the cathode-organic interface, and/or delamination of one or both of the cathode-organic and the anode-organic interface. One reason for delamination of cathode-organic interface is the formation of gases like H2 when water vapor reacts with the metallic cathode. The release of H2 enables the creation of an affected area which often is much larger than that of the cathode which is actually consumed by the water vapor by direct chemical reaction. The delamination spreads as more cathode reacts with water vapor, forming more H2 gas. Delamination of the organic-anode interface is also often observed. In such cases a conformally coated thin film barrier layer, along with the cathode and organic layers, may delaminate from the anode, thus causing the device to fail.
As previously described, the delamination of two films to result in formation of two detached surfaces requires energy. If the driving force for the formation of two new surfaces is greater than the energy of formation of the new total surface area, then the interface delaminates. Similar to the formation and propagation of cracks in a surface, if the energy at the tip of the crack is somehow diffused, a greater amount of energy is required to propagate the crack.
A technique of putting energy barriers in the path of cracks to slow down their propagation has been utilized by Mandlik et al., 2006 to obtain electrical conductors with suppressed crack propagation upon stretching. When thin gold conducting lines are deposited on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with thin Cr films sandwiched in between, the resulting structure can be stretched to many tens of percent of strain as shown by Stephanie P. Lacour et al., 2005. This strain is higher than the degree to which a free standing metal film can be stretched. However, upon stretching, the electrical resistance of such conducting lines increases due to the propagation of micro-cracks in the lines. The increase in the resistance of these conductors can be prevented if the free propagation of micro-cracks is suppressed. If the crack propagation is suppressed to the extent that the increase in the resistance of the conductor is purely because of the thinning of the conductor, the conductor may be considered as being deformed purely elastically.
For uni-axial elastic stretching of a metal conductor with dimensions lo×wo×to along the length, to final dimensions l×w×t, the strain along the length is ϵl=(l−lo)/lo, so l=lo(1+ϵ). If the Poisson's ratio is ν, then w=wo(1−νϵ) and t=to(1−νϵ). The initial value of resistance of the metal piece is given by,
where is ρ the resistivity of the metal.
The final value of the resistance after the stretching is given by,
After substituting the values of l, w and t, we obtain,
This ratio R/Ro for the change in the resistance with applied strain is obtained for a metal conductor that is stretched elastically. It represents the minimum possible variation in the resistance that can be achieved when a metal conductor is stretched. Mandlik et al. utilized the energy barriers in crack suppression to obtain such a variation in electrical resistance of the gold conductors. Without the use of these barriers, upon stretching, it was found that the cracks propagated freely across the conductor, causing the resistance of the conductor to rise profusely upon stretching as described by Stephanie P. Lacour et al, 2005.
The pattern made to suppress crack propagation in the conductor was a two dimensional array of nano-sized pyramidal hillocks on the surface of the elastomeric substrate, with the metal conductor deposited on top of patterned PDMS. (P. Mandlik et al. 2006). Individual metal conductors were then stretched uni-axially. Resistance and load values were recorded. Electrical contacts of conducting epoxy paste with thin gold wires set in were used to measure the electrical resistance, and the variation of resistance (R/Ro) with respect to applied strain for various samples was plotted. It was found that the change in resistance for the samples without tilt was nearly similar to that of the micro-cracked samples reported by Stephanie P. Lacour et al, 2005. However, for the samples with-tilt, the variation of resistance was nearly the same as the elastic stretching of metal conductors obtained by Eq. (3), taking ν to be 0.42 for thin gold films calculated up to 25% of applied strain.
The SEM inspection of the stretched samples revealed a drastic difference in the topography of the samples with- and without-tilt. Samples without-tilt showed random Y-shaped cracks with length on the order of a couple micrometers. The microstructure was similar to that of microcracked samples reported by Stephanie P. Lacour et al, 2005. Delamination of gold was observed in the bases of some pyramids. On the other hand, samples with pyramids obstructing the propagation of cracks showed localized cracks with length on the order of a couple hundred nanometers. The orientation of cracks seemed to be random. In these samples, the orientation of the pyramidal array was chosen such that pyramids act as obstacles in propagation of cracks, and the sample cracks were localized to smaller lengths. It was found that there was no straight path available for the cracks to propagate in the transverse direction, which is the most facilitated direction for their progress in uni-axial stretching. In other words, disorienting the pyramidal array with respect to the transverse direction reduced the typical lengths of the cracks and rendered them localized.
In contrast to the work by Mandlik and Lacour, embodiments of the present invention provide enhanced mechanical integrity and prolonged shelf life of OLEDs or similar moisture-sensitive electronic devices encapsulated with a conformally-coated thin film barrier, by minimizing the spread of a delamination region using topographical non-uniformities in the device structure. For example, a device may be made deliberately non-planar by introducing multiple energy barriers which can prevent or minimize the propagation of a delamination, because the delamination will have to cross the energy barriers in order to spread to a larger area.
In contrast to the structure shown in
The topographically non-planar layer may include, for example, a grid structure disposed over the anode.
When a grid or similar structure as shown in
The organic emissive layer may be a blanket layer, or it may include multiple pixels or sub-pixels, i.e., individually-addressable units of emissive layer material.
The pixelation of the organic layers may improve the mechanical integrity of the overall device. Due to a general lack of adhesion to the underlying inorganic anode, organic layers may be particularly prone to delamination. The use of an organic layer that includes multiple, physically-separate regions may prevent a localized delamination within one such region from significantly affecting other regions.
Delamination in an electronic device such as an OLED may result from internal stresses of one of the device layers, or it may be caused by external forces such as the thin film barrier or ingress of moisture via a particle. Similar to the configurations previously described with respect to moisture ingress through existing layers, in some embodiments the use of a topographically non-planar layer may prevent or reduce delamination caused by moisture ingress resulting from the presence of a foreign particle.
In some embodiments, the topographical non-planar layer may be incorporated into, or may be a part of, another layer in the device. For example, the topographical non-planar layer may be incorporated into the substrate or another layer of the device as a groove-like or similar feature in the layer. That is, instead of protruding above the plane of a layer on which the topographical non-planar layer is disposed, the topographical non-planar layer may be embedded within another layer of the device. Such a configuration performs a similar function as a protruding layer as previously described, by creating an energy barrier in the path of a delamination to prevent or limit the spread of the delamination. As another example, the topographical non-planar layer may include features that are a part of an existing layer.
In some configurations, a topographically non-planar layer may include one or more topographical non-uniformities, such as the bus lines described with respect to
Experimental and Modeling
Two devices were fabricated and tested. A first device was fabricated with all planar layers in the active area, such as illustrated in
The effectiveness of topographical non-uniformities in minimizing the progress of delamination may be explained using a model of the progression of a delamination.
As previously described, embodiments of the invention may use multiple topographic non-uniformities to prevent or reduce delamination. To preserve the topographical features even after the thin film barrier deposition, it may be preferred for the barrier to coat the topography conformally, such as shown in
In multi-layer thin film encapsulation, such as an inorganic/polymer barrier layer stack, an inorganic/decoupling barrier layer stack, or the like, the organic layer may act as a planarization layer. In this case the topographic features of the non-uniformity may be compromised or smoothed out, thus reducing or removing the effectiveness of the non-uniformity as an energy barrier to prevent delamination, such as shown in
It is understood that the various embodiments described herein are by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. For example, many of the materials and structures described herein may be substituted with other materials and structures without deviating from the spirit of the invention. The present invention as claimed may therefore include variations from the particular examples and preferred embodiments described herein, as will be apparent to one of skill in the art. It is understood that various theories as to why the invention works are not intended to be limiting.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/659,662, filed Jun. 14, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The claimed invention was made by, on behalf of, and/or in connection with one or more of the following parties to a joint university corporation research agreement: Regents of the University of Michigan, Princeton University, The University of Southern California, and the Universal Display Corporation. The agreement was in effect on and before the date the claimed invention was made, and the claimed invention was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the agreement.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4769292 | Tang et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5247190 | Friend et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5293546 | Tadros | Mar 1994 | A |
5703436 | Forrest et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707745 | Forrest et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711824 | Shinohara | Jan 1998 | A |
5834893 | Bulovic et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844363 | Gu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6013982 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6080030 | Isaka et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087196 | Sturm et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091195 | Forrest et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097147 | Baldo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6294398 | Kim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303238 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337102 | Forrest et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339289 | Fork | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6433355 | Riess et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433487 | Yamazaki | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6468819 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6597111 | Silvernail et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6630684 | Lee | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6670772 | Arnold et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6831407 | Cok | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7071617 | Utsumi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084565 | Cho | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7176621 | Do | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7279704 | Walters | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7332232 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431968 | Shtein et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7595586 | Oh et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598115 | Song et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7786665 | Nakanishi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800295 | D'Andrade et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7847311 | Kim | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7968146 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7994710 | Jeon et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8179034 | Potts | May 2012 | B2 |
8395305 | Fujimoto | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8569948 | Wolk et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8697254 | Shi | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698177 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8809842 | Song et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9194545 | Inada | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20010001485 | Bao et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010019242 | Tada | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010038102 | Kawase | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020079835 | Lee | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020118271 | Mashimo | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030062520 | Toguchi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076589 | Suleski et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098647 | Silvernail et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117067 | Roitman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030230337 | Gaudiana | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230980 | Forrest et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040017152 | Hashimoto | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033675 | Fleming | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040070335 | Cok | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085018 | Kuo | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087252 | Huang | May 2004 | A1 |
20040174116 | Lu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217702 | Garner | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227462 | Utsumi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050023974 | Chwang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045900 | Silvernail | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088084 | Cok | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050141240 | Hata et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050194892 | Lu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060007552 | Takakuwa | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030074 | Mund et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054893 | Nathan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065904 | Uemura | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060082285 | Wu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097629 | Son | May 2006 | A1 |
20060175960 | Noh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070019410 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070052353 | Yang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079869 | Yukinobu | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096642 | Lee | May 2007 | A1 |
20070210309 | Cho et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210702 | Nakamura | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070290225 | Lee et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290608 | Choi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292986 | Fujii | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024402 | Nishikawa | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080081105 | Suh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100202 | Cok | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116460 | Choi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121887 | Choi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080176041 | Sato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080220265 | Xia et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238295 | Takei et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258605 | Yukinobu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265757 | Forrest | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090057657 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066241 | Yokoyama | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090230384 | Meng et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100136724 | Mary et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141123 | Joo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150513 | Zhang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100187984 | Lin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100300529 | Kawahara | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315576 | Chung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001420 | Tchakarov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110114931 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110151607 | Landis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110171447 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110253987 | Chung et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110278548 | Takezoe | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279027 | Boerner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120021548 | Yamazaki | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120091488 | Vermersch | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120103660 | Gupta et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132897 | Seki | May 2012 | A1 |
20120161614 | Boerner | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120223634 | Xia | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235178 | Mori | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130000952 | Srinivas et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004750 | Majumdar | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004753 | Majumdar et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130032204 | Gaudiana | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056876 | Harvey | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108840 | Ivanov et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146875 | Mandlik | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157446 | Lifka et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130177732 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130240861 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140001450 | Shinotsuka et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008628 | Yamana et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027753 | Yamana et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049923 | Ma et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140103336 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140151651 | Jin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140167017 | Shinotsuka et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225091 | O'Carroll et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140306213 | Sato | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140332794 | Birnstock et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361270 | Cui et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150001470 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150041787 | Malik | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150171371 | Jeon | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150179971 | Yamana | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150311474 | Basil | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160254493 | Sun | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008057394 | May 2008 | WO |
2010011390 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Process and Design of a Multilayer Thin Film Encapsulation of Passive Matrix OLED Displays,” L. Moro, T.A. Krajewski, N. M. Rutherford, O. Philips, R. J. Visser, Vitex Systems, 2004. |
“Enabling Technology for OLED Displays,” John McMahon, Vitex Systems, 2003. |
Baldo, et al., “Highly efficient phosphorescent emission from organic electroluminescent devices”, Nature, vol. 395, pp. 151-154, 1998. |
Baldo, et al., “Very high-efficiency green organic light-emitting devices based on electrophosphorescence”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 4-6, Jul. 5, 1999. |
Chang, et al., “Highly Efficient Blue-Emitting Iridium(III) Carbene Complexes and Phosphorescent OLEDs”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, pp. 4542-4545, 2008. |
Lacour, et al., “Stretchable Interconnects for Elastic Electronic Surfaces”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 93, 1459, 2005. |
Mandlik, et al., “Fully Elastic Interconnects on Nanopatterned Elastomeric Substrates”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 8, Aug. 2008. |
McMahon, et al., “Thin film encapsulation and flexible barrier substrates for OLED displays”, Vltex Systems, OLEDAsia 2004, 2004. |
Salbek, et al., “Low molecular organic glasses for blue electroluminescence”, Synethic Metals 91, 209-215, 1997. |
Schaer, et al., “Water Vapor and Oxygen Degradation Mechanisms in Organic Light Emitting Diodes”, Adv. Funct. Mater, vol. 11, No. 2, p. 116, 2001. |
Tung, et al., “Highly Efficient Red Phosphorescent Osmium(II) Complexes for Oled Applications”, Organometallics, 23, pp. 3745-3748, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130334510 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61659662 | Jun 2012 | US |