Takeoff performance, as currently practiced in the air transport industry involves a series of steps, many of which involve manual crew input. In addition, the primary means of catching errors in this process typically relies on manual cross-checks between the crew.
Many airlines are now using electronic flight bags and/or laptop computers to replace the paper performance data that has been traditionally used. These devices typically host an original equipment manufacturer (OEM)-approved performance calculation tool that will provide the pilot with the predicted takeoff performance data. These tools typically require the manual entry of relevant aircraft and atmospheric data before the calculation can be made. The output of these calculations then has to be manually transferred by the pilots into the flight management system (FMS). This includes V-speeds, weight, and thrust setting. However, human error can occur in this process.
The present invention provides systems and methods for verifying that the flight crew has not made an error in entering takeoff flight performance data into the flight management system (FMS) using the electronic flight bag (EFB). The EFB includes a user interface that receives basic flight plan information and a processor. The EFB includes an On-board Performance Tool (OPT) that calculates takeoff performance data based on a previously entered basic flight plan and pilot entry. The processor automatically receives user-entered takeoff performance data from a flight management system (FMS) located on a host aircraft, automatically compares the OPT calculated takeoff performance data to the received takeoff performance data, and generates an entry error indication, if the comparison indicates that at least a portion of the entered takeoff performance data does not match the calculated takeoff performance data. An output device outputs the generated entry error indication.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
The processor 28 executes a takeoff performance check application 50. The takeoff performance check application 50 receives input from an on-board performance tool application 52 also executed by the processor 28. The takeoff performance check application 50 also receives takeoff performance data entered by the flight crew into the FMS 42. The takeoff performance check application 50 checks that the takeoff performance data entered into the FMS 42 match the takeoff performance data output from the on-board performance tool application 52. An error message is generated, if there exists a mismatch. The generated error message is presented on the display 30. The presented error message includes text and/or special color, highlighting, and/or flashing of an associated icon/light.
The takeoff performance data that may be checked include:
V-speeds;
Flap setting;
Takeoff Thrust;
Weight; and
Center of Gravity (CG).
At a block 92, the processor 28 generates a flag for any manually entered takeoff performance data that differs from the calculated takeoff performance data. An indicator associated with the flag is presented to the pilot on the display 30 or on a comparable device.
The data in the OPT image 100 that is the auto check includes: V1; VR; V2; flap setting; weight; CG; and takeoff thrust setting (% N1). The V1 speed shown here has been identified as having a comparison error with the pilot-entered FMS data.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7149612 | Stefani et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7529603 | Allen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7751951 | Pitard et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769501 | Lusardi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7885734 | Lemoult et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899585 | Rouquette et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20100030408 | Khatwa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094488 | Michal et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152924 | Pandit et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20130124018 | Lentz | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2189448 | Oct 1987 | GB |
Entry |
---|
EP Examination Report for Application No. 14150999.2, dated Jul. 11, 2014. |
EP Search Report for Application No. 14150999.2, dated Jun. 30, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140214246 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |