This invention relates in general to computers, and in particular to the processing and translating of transportation data and functions though linear and non-linear methodologies into active operating parameters.
The historical development of this invention, the EKB, can be examined from three general perspectives: 1) weight, 2) utility and 3) function.
1) Kit bag weight: Pilots, and other transportation professionals, routinely carry extremely heavy bags, full of paraphernalia specific to their art, including maps, calculators, logs, charts, navigation instruments, and so on. This bag is usually referred to as a “kit bag” and generally, for an aviation professional, for example, weighs between 30 and 80 pounds. According to FAA Medical and Workman's Compensation statistics, the most common loss of work time, on the job injuries, in this work group are related to moving, carrying and stowing the “kit bag”: torn shoulder ligaments, dislocated elbows, “slipped disk” back problems, and knee joints.
The problem of the heavy kit bag/injured pilot has been attempted to be solved by at least one other means, adding wheels and a handle to the kit bag, roller-suitcase style.
The following invention was originally conceived with the intention of simply solving the weight problem, as the entire contents of a traditional kit bag can be reduced to an electronic equivalent of about 3-7 lbs. However, in developing the project, other innovative and highly functional properties became apparent.
2) Utility: The current kit bag can be compared to a cumbersome sideways drawer. An area is generally left in the cockpit, to the right or left of the pilot, where the kit bag can be placed. In flight, if an item is needed from the kit bag, there often ensues an unpacking, rummaging and hunting expedition into the kit bag for the sought after manual, tool, chart, log or other desired item. The pilot is taken out of the flying-loop while this hunting expedition is in progress. Another draw-back of the old-fashioned kit bag is the traditional coffee-spill. Coffee-cup holders in the cockpit are generally placed right above the kit back stowage compartment. A kit bag is not considered “broken in” until at least one cup of coffee, orange juice or other non-paper friendly liquid has spilled into the contents of the kit bag and ruined the most important documents needed for the flight in progress, as well as any other important paperwork contained therein.
Further, the traditional kit bag must be hauled around like an additional suitcase. It is here that most on-the-job injuries occur: removing the kitbag from the too tight storage area, heaving it into overhead bins, lifting it in and out of vans and storage facilities.
The utility problem has heretofore not been successfully addressed. Although traditionally kit bags are made in various shapes and from various sorts of materials (including tin, plastic-covered card-board, canvas, etc.), they all only serve to hold contents in a standard method with the result being bulky, cumbersome and heavy.
The EKB approaches the problem from another perspective. By changing the nature of the contents of the kit bag, the nature of the exterior of the “bag” is also modified. The E6-B slide rule is a device, for instance, which can eliminate some wind charts and solve some airspeed/ground speed calculations. Its predecessor, the handheld calculator, designed for the same functions, was an electronic advancement, as is the Performance Management System, an integrated on-board aircraft system. Although these devices may individually partially contribute to certain aspects of a kit bags contents and function (see #3 following), none address the concept of deleting the load or form of the kit bag in any way, let alone the entirety all functional aspects of a kit bag. The EKB is light weight and easily manipulated. It can be moved without undue stress, strain or physical contortion. In use, it will not be below the coffee holders! Less physical storage place is needed, resulting in more cockpit room. Also, less weight is carried on-board, resulting in substantial and measurable fuel savings.
3) Function: As mentioned, with the traditional kitbag, the pilot must rummage through the contents in search of the needed material(s), taking the pilot out the immediate operating loop, and costing precious time, especially in an emergency. Often needed particulars are located in separate and disparate areas. The pilot may need to consult one manual for operating parameters, another book of charts for an off-line emergency airport, another manual for the emergency procedure, while simultaneously taking with dispatch or operations on a radio. The other pilot [in generally two-person airline crews] is left alone to fly a possibly crippled airplane, talk to the flight attendants and passengers, and negotiate with air-traffic control.
Few attempts have been made to alleviate the duress caused by this plethora of unrelated information presented in physically unrelated forms. One limited suggestion known to this inventor was an on-board type computer which used an aircraft up-link device to managed charts. This failed FAA certification, however, partly because it relied on aircraft power. The EKB, while providing much more information as well as information processing, relies on internal battery power (although it can be “charged” from aircraft power as well). The FAA has provided, incidentally, provisional operating permission for use of the EKB on-board.
The EKB requires learning only simple key-stroke patterns to be a superior replacement for the traditional kit bag and contents in many operating situations. Optimal functionality is acquired when all mentioned inputs are interfaced and electronically “evaluated.” Several steps can be incorporated in one or a few input strokes from a proficient operator.
Additionally, the EKB has the potential capability to actually “fly” the aircraft within certain parameters to a touch-down and landing.
A major improvement over the traditional “kit bag” is that the computerized version can manipulate data in a non-linear algorithm, aggregating and sorting choices, thereby aiding in decision-making processes resulting in solutions to mathematical computations, runway selection, operating parameters, figuring pilot fatigue limits and scheduling issues. Output solutions can be interfaced with the craft, auto-pilot style, so that a craft could be manipulated through the EKB via radio/satellite/other mode transmissions by a ground operator in certain emergencies, such as crew incapacitation.
It is the principal object of the current invention to create a device which, through the amalgamation and formalization of disparate operating data into a functional methodology that can then can be translated quickly and easily into today's operating environment, will not only make a pilot's overburdened job easier, but could save lives.
In order to provide background information so that the invention may be completely understood and appreciated in its proper context, reference is made to a number of prior art patents and publications as follows:
Whatever the precise merits, features and advantages of the above cited references, none of them achieves or fulfills the purposes of the present invention.
Other than through exterior suit-case like changes, organizing the contents of the standard pilot kit bag into a more manageable, user/friendly format has not been attempted. Coalescing and analyzing kit bag data electronically is a modern and sensible solution to the both the problems of physical ungainliness and practical application of the standard kit bag. Additionally, the problem of aircraft control during pilot incapacitation has also been inadequately addressed by any means other than self-help (oxygen use) or on-board autopilot capabilities. Heretofore there has been no device which offers a simultaneous, practical and coherent solution for either problem. The electronic, computerized portable kit bag (EKB), offers solutions to both problems in a single package.
The portable, computerized electronic kit bag (EKB) consists of standard and state-of-the-art computer parts and peripherals, interfaced for maximum utility. The EKB can be constructed similarly for several end user-operators, including captains, pilots, commanders, drivers, dispatchers and operations personnel of boats/ships, automobiles, aircraft, spacecraft and other transportation devices. The example used here will apply to the pilot of an airliner.
The computer itself is a laptop type, or ergonomic variation thereof, such as a knee-top style (
Input is acquired online or off-line through modem, cable, direct input, CD, DVD, floppy disk, voice-recognition, infra-red, radio (UHF, VHF), computer linking, video, digitally, scanning or any other accessible and/or compatible means, internet and intranet systems included.
The nature of input data and sources can be typical and/or operationally unusual. This “parent” system is linked with other extant operating systems and data bases, such as reservations, meteorological, dispatch (routing, diversion and alternate planning), load planning, scheduling, airplane operating parameters, aircraft instruments and related systems (engine, hydraulic, GPS, inertial, radar, GPWS, collision avoidance, etc.), FAA crew rest and duty limits, union regulations and rules, charts/maps, log-books, airport analyses and any and all other links and data that may be made available to computer acquisition.
Input is manipulated internally and integrated through traditional linear, “matrix,” or multi-level, cross-access “texotrix” methodology. The central operating program assesses the relationships of input data through a three-dimensional logic based decision-making algorithm. (FIGS. 4,5,6), providing the user with up-to-the-minute, operating information available for pre-flight, en route, post flight or future operations. The pilot can access incremental feedback, monitor, or make adjustments at any point. Processing includes recording, coping, filing, updating, organizing, printing, and generating data, literature, schedules, routing, planning, computations and permutations of all phases of the flight needed at any given point in time.
The processing algorithm operates as follows (for example): a unit of data, or calculation, is presented as input (the wind is 240/10) the result can be accessed immediately, (suggested runway at ORD is 22) or modified by adding another unit of data, or calculation (ice accumulating rapidly) with the result again capable of being accessed, (runway 32 longer, suggested better choice, in spite of wind) or modified (crew legality reaching hourly limit) results available, (runway 27 adequate, quicker access, legal compromise) or modifiable . . . (left wing heat becomes inoperative) and so on. See
Processed information is presented as factual output usable to determine operating options: formula calculations to aid in decision-making and suggested “best choice” solutions.
Output solutions can include flight planning, en route decision making moderated by weather and operating factors, financial analyses of integrated choices, fuel computations, weight-and-balance, crew planning, passenger accommodation/satisfaction result prognostication, and statistic relating to associated elements of an on-time/safe flight/travel operation, and so on.
Output can be presented directly or indirectly, electronically, graphically, printed or displayed on the system screen, or through associated systems by way of cable, infra-red, printer, modem, wireless or any other compatible or available transfer output transfer system.
The EKB data output is formatted to be utilized either directly by the end user, an intermediate user, by a user through an aircraft system, or directly from the device to an aircraft system or autopilot. The EKB includes the capability of being interfaced directly with the aircraft, auto-pilot style, through “hard-wired” cable (by plugging a unit connector cable directly into the autopilot or specific system computer bay), cable-free infrared (for systems so modified to assure compatibility), electronic or other information exchange systems. The process defined by the transmittal of data from a ground based operator or system, through an on-board combined-functions device, resulting in the manipulation or active control of an operating transportation craft can be established in the following manner: the EKB includes receptivity to input in the form of voice activated commands or electronic data transfer, and can output directly to aircraft control systems. Thus, functional radio control of the aircraft can be established from ground based personnel or equipment in emergency situations, such as pilot incapacitation.
The pilot receives information from flight operations regarding a flight plan which includes departure point, destination, alternate airports, and fuel time. The pilot then reviews and uses that information; Then the pilot acquires a weather briefing. Then that information is used by the pilot; Then the pilot acquires, referring to #3 and said
Referring to
In Summary, the present invention is a portable, computerized, electronic kit bag (EKB) consisting of standard and state-of-the-art computer parts and peripherals, interfaced for maximum utility, a central operating program which assesses the relationships of input data through a three-dimensional logic based decision-making algorithm, an EKB data output formatted to be utilized either directly by the end user, an intermediate user, by a user through an aircraft system, or directly from the device to an aircraft system or autopilot, a process defined by the transmittal of data from a ground based operator or system, through an on-board combined-functions device, resulting in the manipulation or active control of an operating transportation craft, a translucent secondary window designed for the purpose of overlaying “heads-up” display information directly over maps, charts or other data displayed by a primary computer screen, an all-in-one interactive headgear which interfaces with an EKB, and an ergonomically designed knee-top style EKB.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09699963 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 11501516 | Aug 2006 | US |