The present invention relates to electronic locks, and, more particularly, to an electronic lock having a mobile device user interface.
An electronic lock typically includes a keypad having multiple buttons to facilitate lock operation. In addition, the keypad may be used to enter or change lock settings. Lock settings may include, for example, user access codes. Such entering or changing of lock settings may include programming user access codes into lock memory, deleting user access codes from lock memory, and/or entering other customer or lock settings. Typically, the keypad and other user accessible switches are used as the main user interface to change or adjust the lock settings by an authorized user.
The keypad interface is usually sufficient if the number of access codes and settings are not that many, i.e., so long as the lock user does not have to remember too many button sequences to gain access to internal menu, programming options or setting changes. This keypad user interface method, however, becomes problematic and cumbersome when the number of available user access codes exceeds the user's ability to remember the key sequences, such as for example, if the number of user access codes is high, such as 30 or more, and/or the overall number of lock settings is high. As such, the keypad interface may not be a user friendly solution if a customer is required to push a button or a sequence of buttons multiple times to be able to program a user access code into lock memory. This also assumes the user has the instructions saved and readily available to make changes when needed. These steps become very tedious and prone to mistakes, and eventually may result in a frustrated user of the electronic lock.
Thus, the keypad user interface may yield a poor user experience when the number of features that require setting or access increase. In addition, limiting the electronic lock to a keypad user interface makes it very difficult for the manufacturer and hardware providers to enable richer options and better user experience, thus resulting in limited features in the electronic lock.
Some electronic locks have attempted to address this problem by providing a dedicated touch display rather than a keypad, but such an alternative dedicated hardware solution may face similar challenges or at the least become cost prohibitive from a manufacturing and price competition perspective. Other solutions have attempted to provide voice feedback to the user as well. However, overall cost is major factor in providing a reasonable interactive solution. What is needed in the art is an electronic lock having a mobile device user interface, wherein the lock settings of the electronic lock may be set wirelessly via an existing mobile device.
It is recognized that mobile devices have become readily available and commonly used by the public. With the present invention, an existing mobile device, such as a smartphone or tablet, is used to access the lock settings of the electronic lock and to make the necessary changes to the lock settings. Advantageously, with the present invention there is no need to add expensive dedicated hardware displays to the electronic lock. Rather, with embodiments of the present invention a user operates an existing mobile device executing a lock settings user interface application, commonly referred to as an “App,” configured to communicate with the electronic lock to allow the user to enter or change lock settings for the electronic lock. The mobile device user interface is easier to use than a keypad interface in modifying the lock settings of the electronic lock, and provides more programming options, thus improving the user experience in changing lock settings of the electronic lock.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of the illustrated embodiment exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The present disclosure will be described hereafter with reference to the attached drawings which are given as non-limiting examples only, in which:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate an embodiment of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring now to the drawings and particularly to
As shown in
Referring also to
Referring again to
Referring particularly to
Referring to
Processing unit 17 includes a commercially available microprocessor or a custom built processing unit (ASIC=Application Specific Integrated Circuit) and associated input/output (I/O) circuitry, and is configured for electronic communication with memory unit 18 and mobile device communication unit 19.
Memory unit 18 is an electronic semiconductor memory device, such as for example, an erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), embedded memory in the processing unit 17, etc. As shown in
Mobile device communication unit 19 of electronics circuitry 9 of the electronic lock EL is an ASIC configured for wireless communication with the existing mobile device 20 using one or more of Bluetooth, NFC, Wifi (e.g., IEEE 802.11x), etc. communication protocols.
Referring also to
In operation:
Since the electronic lock is a battery operated device, it is desirable that the mobile App generating the lock settings mobile device user interface menu should not be in a continuous synchronization mode, even though it can, to save battery life. Once the mobile device 20 is synced by either downloading the lock settings or uploading the lock settings, the user can make all the changes offline until a sync between mobile device 20 and electronic lock EL is needed. This way battery life is saved and more convenience is given to the user instead of standing next to the door for synchronization.
Encryption techniques well known in the art may be used to protect the transfer of lock setting information between the electronic lock and mobile device 20, if desired.
It is contemplated that the mobile App executing on mobile device 20 may be expanded to have other control features for the lock, if desired.
The present invention may also be used in electronic lock design and manufacturing to facilitate and simplify lock development, manufacturing testing, field repairs and other capabilities and features.
Advantageously, with the present invention there is no need to add an expensive dedicated hardware user interface display to the electronic lock. Rather, with the present invention a user operates an existing mobile device that executes a lock settings mobile device user interface App configured to communicate with the electronic lock to allow the user to enter or change lock settings for the electronic lock. The mobile device user interface is easier to use than a keypad interface, and provides more programming options, thus improving the user experience in changing lock settings of the electronic lock. Also, the present invention takes into account battery life by allowing the user to manipulate lock settings while working offline. Further, the present invention facilitates communication with the electronic lock without having to utilize a network gateway or network controller.
Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to particular means, materials and embodiments, from the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can easily ascertain the essential characteristics of the present disclosure and various changes and modifications may be made to adapt the various uses and characteristics without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the following claims.
The present application is related to and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/719,039, filed on Oct. 26, 2012, entitled “Electronic Lock Having a Mobile Device User Interface.” The subject matter disclosed in that provisional application is hereby expressly incorporated into the present application in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4783638 | Mamodaly | Nov 1988 | A |
5729057 | Frenzel | Mar 1998 | A |
5739766 | Chaloux | Apr 1998 | A |
5841390 | Tsiu | Nov 1998 | A |
6038895 | Menke | Mar 2000 | A |
6209367 | Hyatt, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6370381 | Minnick et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6906612 | Ghabra | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6937140 | Outslay et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6967562 | Menard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20030137404 | Bonneau et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151493 | Straumann | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20060255909 | Pavatich | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070290792 | Tsuchimochi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080011032 | Groff | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090256677 | Hein | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100283579 | Kraus | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110234377 | Landuyt et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120073338 | Mohla | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120157080 | Metivier | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196588 | Shah | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120213362 | Bliding | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130295986 | Mueck | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130342314 | Chen | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140028438 | Kuenzi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0753822 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1835436 | Sep 2007 | EP |
WO0065551 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2009088901 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2009158181 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2010012463 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO2011109005 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report; Patent Cooperation Treaty; Feb. 19, 2014. |
International Search Report; Patent Cooperation Treaty; Feb. 6, 2014. |
International Search Report; Patent Cooperation Treaty; Apr. 10, 2014. |
USPTO; Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 14/059,625; Aug. 27, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140118107 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61719039 | Oct 2012 | US |