The present invention relates to electronic seals generally and more particularly to tamper-resistant electronic seals.
The following U.S. Patents are believed to be representative of the prior art:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,750,197; 5,056,837; 5,097,253; 5,127,687; 5,169,188; 5,189,396; 5,406,263; 5,421,177; 5,587,702; 5,656,996 and 6,069,563.
The present invention seeks to provide an improved electronic seal.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a tamper-resistant remotely monitorable electronic seal including a shaft portion, a socket arranged to engage the shaft portion in a monitorable manner, whereby disengagement of the socket and the shaft portion results in a monitorable event, and a wireless communicator associated with at least one of the shaft portion and the socket and being operative to provide a remotely monitorable indication of the monitorable event. Preferably, the wireless communicator is a transceiver. Additionally, the shaft portion includes at least one conductive path which is interrupted in response to disengagement of the socket and the shaft portion and wherein the wireless communicator is operative to provide a remotely monitorable indication of the monitorable event.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the shaft portion includes a frangible shaft portion having a press-fit tip, the socket includes a press-fit socket arranged to engage the press-fit tip in a destructably removable manner, whereby disengagement of the socket and the shaft portion results in breakage of the shaft portion, the at least one conductive path extends at least through the shaft portion and is breakable in response to breakage of the shaft portion, and the wireless communicator is associated with at least one of the shaft portion and the press-fit socket and is operative to provide a remotely monitorable indication of the integrity or lack of integrity of the at least one conductive path. Preferably, the at least one conductive path is defined by conductors extending through the shaft portion which are in electrical contact with a conductor formed in the press-fit socket when the shaft portion and the socket are in press-fit engagement. Additionally, the press-fit tip includes a toothed tip. Alternatively, the at least one conductive path includes at least one reed switch which is operated by a magnet associated with the socket whereby when the shaft portion is separated from the socket for any reason, the at least one conductive path is broken.
In accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the shaft portion includes a frangible shaft portion having a lockable portion, the socket includes a locking element arranged to engage the lockable portion in a destructably removable manner, whereby disengagement of the locking element and the shaft portion results in breakage of the shaft portion, the at least one conductive path extends at least through the shaft portion and is breakable in response to breakage of the shaft portion, and the wireless communicator is associated with at least one of the shaft portion and the socket and is operative to provide a remotely monitorable indication of the integrity or lack of integrity of the at least one conductive path. Preferably, the shaft portion includes a groove adaptable for lockable engagement with the locking element. Additionally, the at least one conductive path includes at least one reed switch which is operated by a magnet associated with the socket whereby when the shaft portion is separated from the socket for any reason, the at least one conductive path is broken.
In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the communicator is located in a sensing circuitry and communicator housing integrally formed with the shaft portion. Preferably, the frangible shaft portion includes at least one frangible location having relatively weak mechanical strength as compared with other portions of the shaft portion.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Shaft portion 10 preferably includes a weakened frangible portion 20, located intermediate the sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 12 and the tip 14. Frangible portion 20 is preferably located closer to sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 12 than to tip 14 and typically has a lesser thickness than the remainder of the shaft portion 10.
A conductive loop 22 preferably extends through shaft portion 10 through to the tip 14 thereof and is configured and mounted in shaft portion 10, such that breakage of the shaft portion 10 produces a disconnection or significant change in the electrical properties of the conductive loop 22.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, sensing circuitry 23 and an RF transceiver 24 are housed within sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 12. Sensing circuitry 23 is electrically coupled to conductive loop 22 and senses the integrity thereof. Receiving an output from sensing circuitry 23 is transceiver 24, which is operative to provide transmitted information indicating whether the conductive loop 22 is intact. Conventional wireless monitoring circuitry (not shown) may be employed to receive information which is transmitted by RF transceiver 24 and indicates tampering with the seal which results in breakage of the shaft portion 10.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Shaft portion 30 preferably includes a weakened frangible portion 42, located intermediate the sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 32 and the tip 34. Frangible portion 42 is preferably located closer to sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 32 than to tip 34 and typically has a lesser thickness than the remainder of the shaft portion 30.
A conductive loop 44, including a series connected reed switch 45 which is closed by magnet 41 when shaft portion 30 is in lockable engagement with lock 40, preferably extends through shaft portion 30 through to the tip 34 thereof and is configured and mounted in shaft portion 30, such that breakage of the shaft portion 30 produces a disconnection or significant change in the electrical properties of the conductive loop 44.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, sensing circuitry 46 and an RF transceiver 48 are housed within sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 32. Sensing circuitry 46 is electrically coupled to conductive loop 44 and senses the integrity thereof. Receiving an output from sensing circuitry 46 is transceiver 48, which is operative to provide transmitted information indicating whether the conductive loop 44 is intact. Conventional wireless monitoring circuitry (not shown) may be employed to receive information which is transmitted by RF transceiver 48 and indicates when the shaft portion 30 is located in lockable engagement with lock 40 and when the shaft portion 30 is separated from lock 40 due to either tampering with the seal, which results in breakage of the shaft portion 30, or disengagement of shaft portion 30 and lock 40 by using a key to unlock lock 40. It is appreciated that the provision of reed switch 45 and magnet 41 enables sensing circuitry 46 to sense when the shaft portion 30 is located in lockable engagement with lock 40 and when the shaft portion 30 is separated from lock 40 for any reason, and allows for recording of engagements and disengagements of shaft portion 30 and lock 40.
Reference is now made to
It is appreciated that the reed switch and magnet shown in the illustrated embodiments of
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Shaft portion 50 preferably includes a weakened frangible portion 60, located intermediate the sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 52 and the tip 54. Frangible portion 60 is preferably located closer to sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 52 than to tip 54 and typically has a lesser thickness than the remainder of the shaft portion 50.
A pair of elongate conductors 62 and 64 preferably extends through shaft portion 50 through to the tip 54 thereof and is configured and mounted in shaft portion 50, such that breakage of the shaft portion 50 produces a disconnection or significant change in the electrical properties of at least one and preferably both of conductors 62 and 64. Preferably, conductors 62 and 64 communicate with respective contacts 66 and 68 which are exposed at the end of tip 54 and are arranged to electrically engage an electrical shorting contact 70 at the corresponding interior surface of socket 58 when shaft portion 50 is fully press-fit mounted into socket 58, thereby defining a conductive loop.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, sensing circuitry 71 and an RF transceiver 72 are housed within sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 52. Sensing circuitry 71 is electrically coupled to conductors 62 and 64 and senses the integrity of a conductive loop which is defined by conductors 62 and 64 when the shaft portion 50 is fully seated in socket 58. Receiving an output from sensing circuitry 71 is transceiver 72, which is operative to provide transmitted information indicating whether the conductive loop is intact. Conventional wireless monitoring circuitry (not shown) may be employed to receive information which is transmitted by RF transceiver 72 and indicates tampering with the seal which results in breakage of the shaft portion 50.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Shaft portion 80 preferably includes a weakened frangible portion 92, located intermediate the sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 82 and the tip 84. Frangible portion 92 is preferably located closer to sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 82 than to tip 84 and typically has a lesser thickness than the remainder of the shaft portion 80.
A pair of elongate conductors 94 and 96, at least one of which includes a series connected reed switch 98 which is closed by magnet 91 when shaft portion 80 is in lockable engagement with lock 90, extends through shaft portion 80 through to the tip 84 thereof and is configured and mounted in shaft portion 80, such that breakage of the shaft portion 80 produces a disconnection or significant change in the electrical properties of at least one and preferably both of conductors 94 and 96. Preferably, conductors 94 and 96 communicate with respective contacts 102 and 104 which are exposed at the end of tip 84. Contacts 102 and 104 are arranged to electrically engage an electrical shorting contact 106 at the corresponding interior surface of lock 90 when shaft portion 80 is in lockable engagement with lock 90. This electrical engagement, together with the closing of series connected reed switch 98 by magnet 91, thereby defines a conductive loop.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, sensing circuitry 108 and an RF transceiver 110 are housed within sensing circuitry and transceiver portion 82. Sensing circuitry 108 is electrically coupled to conductors 94 and 96 and senses the integrity of a conductive loop which is defined by conductors 94 and 96 when the shaft portion 80 is in lockable engagement with lock 90. Receiving an output from sensing circuitry 108 is transceiver 110, which is operative to provide transmitted information indicating whether the conductive loop is intact. Conventional wireless monitoring circuitry (not shown) may be employed to receive information which is transmitted by RF transceiver 110 and indicates when the shaft portion 80 is located in lockable engagement with lock 90 and when the shaft portion 80 is separated from lock 90 due to either tampering with the seal, which results in breakage of the shaft portion 80, or disengagement of shaft portion 80 and lock 90 by using a key to unlock lock 90. It is appreciated that the provision of reed switch 98 and magnet 91 enables sensing circuitry 108 to sense when the shaft portion 80 is located in lockable engagement with lock 90 and also enables sensing circuitry 108 to sense when the shaft portion 80 is separated from lock 90 for any reason, and allows for recording of engagements and disengagements of shaft portion 80 and lock 90.
Reference is now made to
It is appreciated that the reed switch and magnet shown in the illustrated embodiments of
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove as well as variations and modifications which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the specification and which are not in the prior art.
This application is a 371 of pct/i103/00677 filed on Aug. 14, 2003 which is a CIP of U.S. Application Ser. No. 10/228,841 filed on Aug. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,778,083 right after the “ELECTRONIC LOCKING SEAL”.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL03/00677 | 8/14/2003 | WO | 00 | 1/12/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/021300 | 3/11/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4750197 | Denekamp et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4782784 | Little | Nov 1988 | A |
5056837 | Fuehrer | Oct 1991 | A |
5097253 | Eschbach et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127687 | Guiler | Jul 1992 | A |
5166929 | Lo | Nov 1992 | A |
5169188 | Kupperman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5189396 | Stobbe | Feb 1993 | A |
5392025 | Figh et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396227 | Carroll et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5406263 | Tuttle | Apr 1995 | A |
5410301 | Dawson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5421177 | Sieber et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5471212 | Sharpe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5525992 | Joseph et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534847 | McGregor | Jul 1996 | A |
5565858 | Guthrie | Oct 1996 | A |
5570080 | Inoue et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574977 | Joseph et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587702 | Chadfield | Dec 1996 | A |
5594738 | Crisler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5615247 | Mills | Mar 1997 | A |
5615249 | Solondz | Mar 1997 | A |
5630209 | Wizgall et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642355 | Smith | Jun 1997 | A |
5656996 | Houser | Aug 1997 | A |
5691980 | Welles, II et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5831531 | Tuttle | Nov 1998 | A |
5836002 | Morstein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5910944 | Callicotte et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912623 | Pierson | Jun 1999 | A |
5940006 | MacLellan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6023218 | Tremblay | Feb 2000 | A |
6055426 | Beasley | Apr 2000 | A |
6069563 | Kadner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6154139 | Heller | Nov 2000 | A |
6166627 | Reeley | Dec 2000 | A |
6216003 | Hamajima et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243005 | Haimovich | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256493 | Dorenbosch et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288629 | Cofino et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300903 | Richards et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339397 | Baker | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366779 | Bender et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369710 | Poticny et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6420971 | Leck et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421540 | Gilhousen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466558 | Ling | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507567 | Willars | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6590886 | Easton et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593845 | Friedman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6646555 | Forester et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6744366 | How | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753775 | Auerbach et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778083 | Auerbach et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20040041704 | Auerbach et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060109111 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10228841 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10526102 | US |