The present invention relates generally to locking devices and, more particularly, to a locking system for vending machines and the like and a method for locking and unlocking the same.
In various machines such as vending machines, food machines, candy machines, refrigerated drink machines, and the like, there is ordinarily provided a lock assembly to prevent unauthorized access to the contents thereof. For example, some vending machines are provided with a key-activated lock assembly such as a pop-out T-handle lock assembly which allows an authorized user to open the door of the vending machine with a properly-encoded key. Such T-handle lock assemblies are well known in the art, as evidenced by numerous patents including U.S. Pat. No. 3,089,330 (Kerr), U.S. Pat. No. 3,550,412 (Pitel et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,552,001 (Roop), U.S. Pat. No. 4,760,721 (Steinbach), U.S. Pat. No. 4,899,561 (Myers), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,548,982 (Rawling). With such lock assemblies, the door is initially closed in a loose manner to catch the locking components of the lock assembly. Next, the handle of the locking assembly is rotated to draw the door against the housing of the vending machine and to compress a seal between the door and the housing. Other, more modern, vending machines are provided with a keypad-activated lock assembly which permits the door of the vending machine to be opened when a predetermined access code or combination is entered into the keypad. The prior art, however, failed to provide a lock assembly which automatically pulls the door of a vending machine into a completely closed position against the housing and/or a lock assembly which utilizes a remotely controlled electronic latching mechanism to lock and unlock the door. More recently, however, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,305 (Myers et al.) such a locking system was proposed. Further refinements, improvements and better, different and improved locking components and systems have been sought by users and manufacturers of the machines.
The now most commercially accepted electronic locking system marketed by applicants' assignee TriTeq Lock and Security, LLC. is disclosed and claimed in its aforementioned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,874,828, 6,581,986, 6,575,504 and pending application Pub. No. US 2005/0161953. There, a motor driven bayonet locking system has a bayonet locking element that moves both in the transational and rotational axis and coacts with a stationary slotted plate by extending to enter the plate, rotating to create an interferance from being withdrawn and then retracting to pull in and lock the door.
Other approaches both prior and later which are not believed to have become commercially acceptable sought to employ different types of mechanical latches and undirectionally actions electronic drivers such as solenoids.
Bond U.S. Pat. No. 4,167,104 proposed use of screw posts going into a threaded opening with a solenoid operating latching bolt. Similarly, Stillwagon U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,867,685 and 6,525,644 did the same with a notched post latch.
Martinez Publication US 2003/0127866 proposes a motor driven rotary hook and u-bolt where the hook shape provides pull in cam action.
Beylotte et al. Pub. No. US 2004/0154363 sought to motor drive a threaded post into a threaded split nut as in prior mechanically operated T-handle vending machine locks. Beylotte et al. who proposed a motor driven cam hook an alternative embodiment.
U.S. patent to Myers et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,308) is an earlier form of latch with a pull in function.
Accordingly, a general object of the present invention is to provide an improved locking system capable of even being a key-less electronic operated lock for vending machines and the like.
A related object of the present invention is to provide a cam-operated or bayonet locking system and method for locking and unlocking vending machines or the like in a novel and secure manner.
An additional object of the present invention is to provide a cam-operated or bayonet locking system having the foregoing characteristics which is more reliable, durable, economical and convenient to use.
An electro-mechanical cam-operated system having a function that facilitates specialized movements that can be utilized to secure and seal a variety of devices. The sealing action is being defined as a pulling motion of the primary mechanism. The locking action happens by virtue of a localized geometry that interfaces into an another specialized designed receiver device. The receiver device is generally mounted in a stationary manner. The localized geometrically designed element is called a cam or a bayonet for the purposes of this abstract. The cam or bayonet design is not intended to be a single geometry element that unto itself is design critical to the operation concept of this mechanism. Alternate methodology may be used to facilitate the securing portion of the mechanism.
The cam is designed to operate perpendicular to the receiver in such a manner as to allow it to enter into the receiver by allowing the cam to have geometry that allows the cam to enter into it. After this is accomplished an electrical detection device sends a signal to an electrical control device. This device then sends a signal to a motor that in turn rotates a cylindrical device located about another cam. This cylindrical device has a unique geometry that interfaces with a central located tube type of device and a tubular type pin. The combined rotation causes the other cam to first rotate 90 degrees or thereabout. And then begin to wind its way up a spiral ramp located in a pocket of the cylindrical device. This cylindrical device also has two binary electrical devices that are strategically located to detect the relative position of the locking cam for both rotation and sealing (pull). This cylindrical device has a typical gear shape located on its outside diameter. This gear movement is derived from a worm gear interface that is driven by a motor. The motor derives its intelligence from the electrical controller.
The bayonet is designed to operate tangent to the receiver in such a manner as to allow it to interlock into the receiver by allowing the bayonet to have geometry that allows the bayonet to enter into and pass behind it. After this is accomplished an electrical detection device sends a signal to an electrical control device. This device then sends a signal to a motor that in turn rotates a cylindrical device located about the bayonet. This cylindrical device has a unique geometry that interfaces with a central located tube type of device and a tubular type pin. The combined rotation causes the bayonet to first rotate 90 degrees or thereabout. And then begin to wind its way up a spiral ramp located in a pocket of the cylindrical device. This cylindrical device also has two binary electrical devices that are strategically located to detect the relative position of the bayonet for both rotation and sealing (pull). This cylindrical device has a typical gear shape located on its outside diameter. This gear movement is derived from a worm gear interface that is driven by a motor. The motor derives its intelligence from the electrical controller.
In another embodiment in accordance with the present invention, an optionally key-less electronically operated bayonet locking device and method of operating the same is provided wherein a rotatable and translatable bayonet device or means having an arrow shaped end is carried by respective ones of the vending machine door and cabinet and a stationary slotted receiving member carried by the other one of the respective door and cabinet. The bayonet device arrow shaped end enters the slotted receiving member and then rotates to secure the door and the end translates longitudinally to pull in the door for effectively sealing a door gasket on the machine. The locking device is constructed so as to enable that rotation at least in the transitional phase with longitudinal translation of the arrow shaped end occurs together.
A specific intelligence is embedded into the controller that facilitates several fault modes and operational parameter of the electromechanical system. This intelligence may be delineated as relay or software type of logic. The lock controller provides two specific functions.
Access control functions to ascertain the authorized user is accessing the locking device. Several access control methodologies may be utilized such as keypads with specific codes for entry, hand-held transceivers, electronic digital keys, transponders, etc.
Typical access control functions such as keypads, remote controls and electronic keys are taught in Denison U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,082 and Vandershel U.S. Pat. No. 5,349,345. The locking device may utilize any such access control methodology that is appropriate for the application for the operator and the enclosure the lock is mounted to.
Lock motor control functions once the controller has determined the lock is authorized to change from the locked to unlocked state, or, authorized to change from the unlocked to locked state. The components required to accomplish the required motor control operation are the motor drive, cam or bayonet, Receiver, Receiver Sensor, SW1 end of rotation sensor, SW2 30 degree Sensor, over-current sensor, and the CPU based controller.
The cylindrical device has a cover located about the opposite side of the area that causes the pin to wind it way on the ramp. This cover keeps the pin in a proper perpendicular path to the mechanisms securing motion.
The utilization of this device is providing simple easy access to devices that by necessity of application have a gasket or another means of sealing a door or the like. This would be described by what is common known as an automotive door. The door must be accelerated to a speed that can facilitate the compression of the gasket and then secure the door. Much like slamming of a car door. This device provides an alternate method of closing the door and pulling the gasket to a sealed condition. This device is also furthered in its invention by having methodology through electrical monitoring of the cam or bayonet conditions to adjust the pressure on the door gasket or seal. This is accommodated either by electrical position devices or detecting the motor characteristics by the electrical controller. The automotive door is used to only describe the actions, which caused the necessity of this invention. Any device that has a requirement for securing and sealing is a possible application of this device.
Applications: Truck Doors, Vending Machine Doors, Automotive Doors, Refrigerator Doors, Etc.
The cylindrical device with its associated motor and electrical detection devices are always mounted in a manner that separates them from the receiver unit. To further clarify this explanation consider the following sample concept, a car door has a rotary type securing device that is generally located in the door that secures its via a mechanical interface with a pin that is located in the frame of the vehicle. The cylindrical device would draw a similarity in its function as the rotary type device. The utility of this is to further the security by sealing the door after closing. Recalling that this device in its improvement into the market does not require massive forces to initiate the function of securing the cam or bayonet. This means that the device the system is mounted to would inherently be subject to less stress and wear, thus extending its life.
While there are mechanisms in the public domain that facilitate total system functionality of the specific motion similar to that being described here. One of the unique attributes of this product design is its ability to absorb very high closing impact forces without subjecting the system or the mechanism it is mounted to any impact damages. This system has shock absorbing devices located within the tube and positioned on the end of the cam or bayonet. Such is this geometry that it does not deter from the adjustment function as an independent local event in the motion of pulling in. The cam or bayonet in this system also serves to assist with alignment of the device it's attached to. By moving from the closed to the secure positions the cam or bayonet has geometry which considers the perpendicularity into its motion and effectively cams it into the perpendicular position.
Also the other commercial systems which have similar motion to securing and sealing do not utilize the unique rotary motion of the cam or bayonet used in this system.
This system replaces many devices in the public domain. Systems such a handles for vending machines. This system is designed to operate within the structure of the device it is securing. Therefore there is not external means by which to attack it. It may operate via an electrical controller that can utilize a variety of communication methods that are commercially available. These include but are not limited to Infrared, Radio frequency, and Switch keylock.
Because this design requires the application of an electrical signal to the motor to activate the system for both securing and opening sequence These activities can be monitored for later data collection. This data collection can be facilitated in many methodologies. This data then can serve the operator or owner for the purposes of detecting what key was used to gain access to the system.
One methodology which is being claimed that is unique to this design is the ability to monitor the data through acquisition of the data with the remote initialization device. Typically known as a key, Key FOB of remote control. While this data collection is not primary to the system function. It acts to enhance the product to the market place.
US Reference:
U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,305 Fort Lock
U.S. Pat. No. 4,993,247 Sampo Lock
U.S. Pat. No. 5,272,894 Star Lock
Fort Lock U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,305 shows a type of system that pulls in. The pulling forces are transmitted through a rotor type latch. This system differs in that it uses a local designed bayonet that interfaces with a special receiver unit. Sampo U.S. Pat. No. 4,993,247 cites a slip nut arrangement. And U.S. Pat. No. 5,272,894 Star lock shows a retrofit design that eliminates the lazy action but still require manual input.
The stationary receiver unit of
Between Item 102 and mounting plate Item 105 mounting plate there is a thin plate to allow for a sliding friction plate surface this allows for a lubrication area.
In consideration of the electrical functions of the system the following description applies to the controller utilized. This controller features unique combination of sensing and control that differentiate it from controllers used in the public domain.
Locked to Unlocked for Both the Cam and Bayonet Locking Systems:
For specific details of the electronic control operation, reference may be made to our co-pending application publication Jul. 28, 2005 as US 2005/0161953A1. In controlling the motor to change the state of the lock from locked to unlocked, the controller must first receive a valid access control signal from the operator (via a secure access control input means such as a keypad or hand-held transmitter) and shall proceed to energize the motor in the forward direction. The controller will wait for a position feedback indicator which is measured by a controller CPU to determine the lock has landed in the unlocked state. If this sensor is closed, the controller will proceed to break and de-energize the motor. In case the sensor is failed, the controller uses a motor current feedback signal to detect end of worm gear travel by sensing a stall motor condition and to de-energize the motor. In case both sensors fail, the controller will discontinue operation based on elapsed time.
In the case an over-current signal is received, the controller must determine if this signal is a function of a jammed cam with the lock still in the locked state, or if this signal is a function of the worm gear reaching the unlocked state and the sensor failed. In the case of a jam, the receiver sensor is expected to be closed and the condition is still locked. Thus, the controller will proceed to assume a locked condition. In the case the receiver sensor is open, it as assumed that the cam has unseated from the receiver and the lock is unlocked. Thus, the controller will proceed to the unlocked state.
Unlocked to Locked for the Cam Locking System:
In controlling the motor,
The receiver 13 sensor
In
As seen in
In
Referring to
Flow charts
Referring to
In accordance with the present aspect of the invention, the cam 1 is preferably like that in
As explained further herein, the present invention can be used with an axially rotatable pin with a finned end here shown on the door B in
Unlocked to Locked for the Bayonet Locking System:
In controlling the motor
In addition to the typical locking control operation described above, several safety and fault tolerant monitoring processes must be included in the locking control algorithm. For example, when the controller proceeds to energize the motor, the bayonet will begin to turn and will proceed to be captured behind the stationary receiver device to accomplish the locking feature. At this interface, there can exist a misalignment of the bayonet to the receiver
The bayonet jam detection will most likely take place during the period the bayonet is rotating to pass behind the receiver. This period is detected by the controller by monitoring a feedback sensor that measures the
The bayonet receiver sensor
A sensor that measures the current draw of the motor turning the bayonet. If while the
The bayonet jam recovery procedure that the controller shall follow is described below:
The controller
The controller shall proceed with a forward energization of the lock motor to return the bayonet to the fully unlocked position. Once the
Flow-charts
In accordance with another feature of the invention, referring to
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/386,928, filed Mar. 22, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/905,524, filed Jan. 7, 2005, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/345,864, filed Jan. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,874,828, incorporated herein by reference, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/962,508, filed Sep. 25, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,581,986), incorporated herein by reference, which is based on Disclosure Document No. 453,811, filed Mar. 26, 1999, entitled “Vending Cam Lock,” incorporated herein by reference, and claims priority on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/252,210, filed Nov. 21, 2000, incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to, and incorporates by reference, U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,504, filed Sep. 25, 2001, which descends from the aforesaid Provisional application (i.e., U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/252,210).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1875768 | Smith | Sep 1932 | A |
1907625 | Vogt | May 1933 | A |
2269264 | Haim | Jan 1942 | A |
2703431 | Tatom | Mar 1955 | A |
2741503 | Thompson | Apr 1956 | A |
2753202 | Smith et al. | Jul 1956 | A |
2833536 | Joachim et al. | May 1958 | A |
2877637 | Greenwald | Mar 1959 | A |
2896990 | Garvey et al. | Jul 1959 | A |
2903288 | Joachim et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
2943880 | Joachim et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
2978266 | Poe | Apr 1961 | A |
3080633 | Reddy | Mar 1963 | A |
3081078 | Lohr | Mar 1963 | A |
3089330 | Kerr | May 1963 | A |
3200623 | Peters | Aug 1965 | A |
3550412 | Pitel et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3594876 | Gunther | Jul 1971 | A |
3688352 | Gunther | Sep 1972 | A |
3835678 | Meyer et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3854310 | Paull | Dec 1974 | A |
3947060 | Zimmer | Mar 1976 | A |
4126341 | Bradstock | Nov 1978 | A |
4159138 | Smith | Jun 1979 | A |
4167104 | Bond | Sep 1979 | A |
4213230 | Hoen | Jul 1980 | A |
4227723 | Rosell | Oct 1980 | A |
4268076 | Itoi | May 1981 | A |
4300664 | Helm et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4355830 | Rau, III | Oct 1982 | A |
4411544 | Gallman | Oct 1983 | A |
4552001 | Roop | Nov 1985 | A |
4556244 | Bisbing | Dec 1985 | A |
4583775 | Bisbing | Apr 1986 | A |
4594637 | Falk | Jun 1986 | A |
4609215 | Self et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4671547 | Weinerman et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4685709 | Kambic | Aug 1987 | A |
4744392 | Tade et al. | May 1988 | A |
4760721 | Steinbach | Aug 1988 | A |
4762348 | Matsumoto | Aug 1988 | A |
4796932 | Tame | Jan 1989 | A |
4803460 | Rhee et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4819983 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4842313 | Boyko et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851742 | Chapman | Jul 1989 | A |
4866955 | Blair | Sep 1989 | A |
4880263 | Yamada | Nov 1989 | A |
4892340 | Matumoto | Jan 1990 | A |
4899561 | Myers | Feb 1990 | A |
4906035 | Nagai et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917022 | Ogasawara et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4951979 | Escaravage | Aug 1990 | A |
4968074 | Yamagishi | Nov 1990 | A |
4993247 | Minemura | Feb 1991 | A |
5035452 | Rogers | Jul 1991 | A |
5054300 | Nakahara et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5106251 | Steinbach | Apr 1992 | A |
5148691 | Wallden | Sep 1992 | A |
5160180 | Mlynarczyk | Nov 1992 | A |
5186516 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5199288 | Merilainen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5269161 | Stillwagon | Dec 1993 | A |
5272894 | Stillwagon et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5288115 | Inoue | Feb 1994 | A |
5349345 | Vanderschel | Sep 1994 | A |
5394718 | Hotzl | Mar 1995 | A |
5467619 | Stillwagon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5548982 | Rawling | Aug 1996 | A |
5575515 | Iwamoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5617082 | Denison et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5618082 | Jachmich | Apr 1997 | A |
5636881 | Stillwagon | Jun 1997 | A |
5639130 | Rogers, Jr. et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656867 | Kokubu | Aug 1997 | A |
5656899 | Kuroda | Aug 1997 | A |
5680783 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5713613 | Honma | Feb 1998 | A |
5762384 | Bartel | Jun 1998 | A |
5791179 | Brask | Aug 1998 | A |
5793122 | Dingwall | Aug 1998 | A |
5802894 | Jahrsetz | Sep 1998 | A |
5813257 | Claghorn et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823027 | Glick et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5862693 | Myers et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915766 | Baumeister et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921119 | Myers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944367 | Imaizumi | Aug 1999 | A |
6005487 | Myers et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6046681 | Solop | Apr 2000 | A |
6049287 | Yulkowski | Apr 2000 | A |
6068305 | Myers | May 2000 | A |
6068308 | Molzer | May 2000 | A |
6068487 | Dionne | May 2000 | A |
6106035 | Hetherington | Aug 2000 | A |
6130611 | Pellaton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6196037 | Urschel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6256932 | Jyawook | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6341448 | Murray et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345522 | Stillwagon et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360573 | Ming-Chih | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370928 | Chies et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374649 | Holcomb | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6406071 | La Viola et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6474119 | Halvorson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496101 | Stillwagon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525644 | Stillwagon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543264 | Frolov | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564600 | Davis | May 2003 | B1 |
6575504 | Roatis | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580355 | Milo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581986 | Roatis et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6684671 | Beylotte et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6729663 | Fisher | May 2004 | B2 |
6867685 | Stillwagon | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874828 | Roatis et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7073827 | Cherry | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7137387 | Edwards | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7191624 | Beylotte et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
8967680 | Yokomori | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9260886 | Myers | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20030127866 | Martinez | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040154363 | Beylotte et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050161953 | Roatis et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060186678 | Myers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20100264677 | Denison | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110084506 | Roatis | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130104459 | Patel | May 2013 | A1 |
20150137531 | Papanikolaou | May 2015 | A1 |
20150184433 | Ueda | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150240534 | Kuriyama | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160010364 | Hanaki | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160145928 | Shimizu | May 2016 | A1 |
20160153212 | Bingle | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
02-091371 | Mar 1990 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100264677 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60252210 | Nov 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10345864 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 10905524 | US | |
Parent | 09962508 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10345864 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11386928 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12827345 | US | |
Parent | 10905524 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11386928 | US |