Generally described, computing devices utilize a communication network, or a series of communication networks, to exchange data. Companies and organizations operate computer networks that interconnect a number of computing devices to support operations or provide services to third parties. The computing systems can be located in a single geographic location or located in multiple, distinct geographic locations (e.g., interconnected via private or public communication networks). Specifically, data centers or data processing centers, herein generally referred to as “data centers,” may include a number of interconnected computing systems to provide computing resources to users of the data center. The data centers may be private data centers operated on behalf of an organization or public data centers operated on behalf, or for the benefit, of the general public.
To facilitate increased utilization of data center resources, virtualization technologies allow a single physical computing device to host one or more instances of a virtual machine, which virtual machine instance appears to a user of a data center as an independent computing device. With virtualization, the host computing device can create, maintain, delete, or otherwise manage virtual machines instances in a dynamic manner. In turn, users can request computing resources from the data center, including single computing devices or a configuration of networked computing devices, and be provided with virtual machine instances that provide the requested computing resources.
An instance of a virtual machine may be configured to provide specific functionality. For example, a virtual machine instance may be associated with different combinations of software applications and operating systems or operating system configurations to enable a virtual machine to provide different desired functionalities, or to provide similar functionalities more efficiently. One or more virtual machine instance configurations are often contained within a service image, which a host computing device may execute in order to implement the desired specific functionality of the virtual machine instance.
In one embodiment, the service image, when executed by virtual machine instance, provides a network accessible service (a.k.a. Web service) corresponding to the software applications/configurations included in the service image. A network accessible service provides specific functionality to other applications and computing resources via a network through application programming interfaces (APIs), which APIs can also be considered a network accessible service or Web service. For example, a service image, when executed, may provide a network accessible database or mass storage service. Once a service image is created, it can be provided to users interested in utilizing computing resources available from a data center for specific purposes.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Generally described, aspects of the present disclosure relate to providing an electronic marketplace for service images. More specifically, an electronic service image marketplace is disclosed that enables customers to browse and acquire a large variety of service images. The service images may be submitted to, and made available from, the electronic service image marketplace, by third party providers or may be submitted to the marketplace by the operator of the marketplace itself. Once acquired through the marketplace, a service image may be launched on a hosted computing environment maintained by the third party provider of the service image or on a hosted computing environment associated with the marketplace.
The electronic service image marketplace provides an environment with which both providers and customers of service images can interact via a network. In one embodiment, a provider may submit a service image to the service image marketplace for inclusion in a service image catalog. The provider may submit additional information corresponding to the service image that would be useful to a customer, such as pricing information, usage conditions, a location of a provider hosted computing environment on which the service image can be hosted, or other information. Customers may browse the service image catalog by interaction with various user interfaces generated by the service image marketplace as described in more detail below. Upon identifying a service image of interest, the customer may view details of each service image in the service image catalog, such as the information submitted by the provider of the service image. In some embodiments, a customer may view further information associated with a service image, such as usage statistics by other marketplace customers of the service image, reviews by other customers, or recommendations for similar or complementary service images. Accordingly, service images may be surfaced to customers in a variety of ways by the electronic service image marketplace, such as by navigation through a browse tree of services organized by function, type, size, etc. or through recommendations, reviews, etc.
Once a customer selects a service image, the customer may purchase or otherwise acquire the service from the service image marketplace. In some embodiments, the customer may be required to submit payment information for the service image prior to launch of the service image. After acquisition of the service image by the customer, the service image may be launched and executed by one or more hosted computing environments. The hosted computing environment may be provided by an operator of the service image marketplace or may be otherwise associated with the electronic service image marketplace. In some embodiments, the third party provider of the acquired service image may provide a hosted computing environment for the service image acquired by the customer via the electronic service image marketplace.
Once the service image is launched and running on a hosted computing environment, the electronic service image marketplace can monitor the usage of functionality or services provided by service image and bill the customer/pay the provider accordingly. Moreover, the electronic service image marketplace may provide the customer with tools to manage, monitor, modify, etc. the service image.
Embodiments discussed below may refer to the users of an electronic marketplace for service images as customers. However, it may be understood that users are not limited to customers but may include owners, administrators, end users and providers of service images purchased from the electronic marketplace. While specific embodiments and example applications of the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the drawings, these embodiments and example applications are intended to illustrate, and not limit, the present disclosure.
Though described herein with reference to hosted computing environments associated with a provider of a service image and with the electronic service image marketplace 100, in some embodiments, additional hosted computing environments may be utilized. For example, a customer computing device 140 may provide a customer hosted computing environment (not shown), or a third party may provide a third party hosted computing environment (not shown). Any or all of these additional hosted computing environments may be accessible to the electronic service image marketplace 100, and may be utilized to host service images available from the electronic service image marketplace 100. For purposes of brevity, such additional hosted computing environments may also be referred to herein as “provider hosted computing environments.”
The provider computing devices 150 and the customer computing devices 140 may communicate with the electronic service image marketplace 100 via a network 130. A provider computing device 150 or customer computing device 140 may be any computing device, such as a laptop or tablet computer, personal computer, server, personal digital assistant (PDA), hybrid PDA/mobile phone, mobile phone, electronic book reader, set-top box, camera, digital media player, and the like. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the network 130 may be any wired network, wireless network or combination thereof. In addition, the network 130 may be a personal area network, local area network, wide area network, cable network, satellite network, cellular telephone network, or combination thereof. In the illustrated embodiment, the network 130 is the Internet. Protocols and components for communicating via the Internet or any of the other aforementioned types of communication networks are well known to those skilled in the art of computer communications and thus, need not be described in more detail herein.
In the illustrated embodiment, the electronic service image marketplace 100 is illustrated as a computer environment including several computer systems that are interconnected using one or more networks. More specifically, the service image marketplace may include a marketplace server 112, a usage monitoring server 114, an electronic catalog 116, and a billing server 118. Each of these will be described in more detail below. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the electronic service image marketplace 100 could have fewer or greater components than are illustrated in
The marketplace server 112 facilitates network submission by third party providers, and browsing and acquisition by customers, of service images in the electronic service image marketplace 100. Accordingly, a provider, utilizing a provider computing device 150, may submit on or more service images to the electronic service image marketplace 100 via the marketplace server 112. The submitted service images may then be included in an electronic catalog 116. The process by which a provider, utilizing a provider computing device 150, submits a service image to the electronic service image marketplace 100 will be described in more detail with respect to
The electronic catalog 116 includes information on service images available from a plurality of providers and on service images made available by the operator of the electronic service image marketplace 100. Accordingly, the marketplace server 112 may obtain service image information for service images offered by a plurality of providers and the marketplace and make the service images available to a customer from a single network resource, such as a Web site. A customer may then acquire the service image from the service image marketplace and launch the service image in a hosted computing environment (e.g., the marketplace hosted computing environment 120 or a provider hosted computing environment 152) in a single interaction or order placed with the service image marketplace. This eliminates the need for the customer to develop his or her own service image; or research, search or otherwise investigate multiple different providers or other sources for the service image. The electronic catalog may be a catalog containing information regarding both items (such as goods and services) and service images, or may be separate catalogs, with one catalog containing information regarding items and the other catalog containing information regarding services images, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Illustratively, marketplace server 112 may generate one or more user interfaces through which a customer, utilizing a customer computing device 140, may browse service images, submit queries for matching service images and view information and details regarding specific service images. An illustrative process by which a customer computing device 140 may query the electronic service image marketplace 100, and by which the marketplace server 112 generates a user interface, will be described in more detail with respect to
After the customer selects a desired service image from the electronic service image marketplace 100, the marketplace server 112 may facilitate the configuration and acquisition of the service image and cause the launching of the service image on a hosted computing environment. In this regard, the marketplace server 112 may receive payment information from the customer computing device 140, as well as information specifying how the service image should be implemented by a hosted computing environment. In some embodiments, the customer may select a specific hosted computing environment to host the selected service image. The specific hosted computing environment may correspond, for example, to the marketplace hosted computing environment 120 associated with the electronic service image marketplace 100, or to a provider hosted computing environment 152 which is associated with the provider of the service image.
Once the service image is launched and running on a hosted computing environment, the electronic service image marketplace 100 can monitor the usage of functionality or services provided by service image and bill the customer/pay the provider accordingly via the usage monitoring server 114 and the billing server 118, respectively. Moreover, the service image marketplace may provide the customer with tools to manage, monitor, modify, etc. the service image. In the illustrated example, the usage monitoring server 114 is in communication with the marketplace hosted computing environment 120, and is operable to track a usage of the functionality (e.g., Web service) provided by the executed service image. This may be required, for example, where pricing of the service image is dependent on usage of the Web services produced by the service image when executed.
The billing server 118, on the other hand, may be provided to process payments from customers and, in some embodiments, provide payment to the providers of acquired service images. The billing server 118 may receive and provide payment information via interaction with the marketplace server 112. In some embodiments, the billing server 118 may alternatively receive and provide payment information via other processes, such as via an additional server, via telephonic interaction, or other mechanisms.
With reference to
Subsequent to submission of the service image and any corresponding information received from the provider computing device 150, the marketplace server 112 may interact with the electronic catalog 116 in order to store the service image and the corresponding information. The electronic catalog 116 may be implemented as a comprehensive catalog of service images that are available to a customer via the electronic service image marketplace 100. Though depicted here as a single service image catalog, the marketplace server 112 may interact with a number of distinct service image catalogs in order to store submitted service images and corresponding information. In one embodiment, the electronic catalog 116 is a conventional database stored in one or more memory storage devices. In other embodiments the electronic catalog 116 is associated with a catalog server (not shown) that is responsible for maintaining the comprehensive catalog stored therein. The electronic catalog 116 and/or associated catalog server may be in communication with other servers and databases also storing catalog information for service images available via the electronic service image marketplace 100. For example, such servers and databases may be operated by different providers and thus, may include various catalog information for service images offered by those providers.
In some embodiments, submission of a service image may not necessarily result in inclusion of the service image in the electronic catalog 116. For example, the electronic service image marketplace 100 may have automated or manual oversight routines for reviewing a service image before inclusion into the electronic catalog 116. Such a review of a service image may result in further communication between the electronic service image marketplace 100 and the provider (not shown) prior to adding the service image to the electronic catalog 116, or may result in not including the service image in the electronic catalog 116.
Though described above with reference to a service image, in some embodiments, the provider may, instead of providing a service image, provide one or more service image components. Such a service image component may correspond to, for example, an application that may be contained within a service image. In these embodiments, service image components may be stored within the electronic catalog 116, and selectable by customers of the electronic service image marketplace 100 for purchase. The electronic service image marketplace 100 may be configured to create a service image in response to a selection to one or more service image components by a customer.
With reference to
Through the user interface 300 the provider may submit information associated with a service image to the electronic service image marketplace 100. The provider, utilizing a provider computing device 150 may submit, via input box 320, an identifier of the service image to be used by the electronic service image marketplace 100. This may be the name displayed to customers of the electronic service image marketplace 100 when they view, browse, or search the electronic service image marketplace 100. The provider may submit additional information, such as a file location (e.g., a file name or address), and pricing information via inputs 324-330. Input box 324 allows the provider to specify the device image that is to be submitted, and that may thereafter be hosted by a hosted computing environment on behalf of a customer. In the illustrated example, the service image location is a location on the provider computing device 150, as is displayed in
In some embodiments, the electronic service image marketplace 100 may create a service image on behalf of the provider. For example, the provider may, instead of providing a location of a service image via input box 324, specify the location of a computing device. The electronic service image marketplace 100 may then locate the specified computing device, and create a service image reflecting the current software running on and/or current configuration of the computing device. Such functionality may be helpful in situations where the provider wishes to provide a service image of the current state of a computing device which exists within the marketplace hosted computing environment 120.
In the illustrated example, input boxes 326-330 enable a provider to specify pricing information associated with the submitted service image. For example, input box 326 enables the provider to specify a pricing structure associated with a service image such as a pricing structure requiring a monthly subscription rate as well as an hourly usage fee. However, as described above, other or additional pricing structures may be used. By way of non-limiting example, a pricing structure may correspond to a one-time fee, a subscription of any duration of time (e.g., years, months, weeks, etc.) that is required regardless of usage, a usage fee charged only for the time a service image is actually used, a per-use or per-access fee such as a fee associated with every time a service image is loaded, or any other pricing structure. In some embodiments, a service image may be provided free of charge. In other embodiments, pricing information may be dependent on the use of a service image. For example, a higher price may be collected for use of a service image in a commercial environment than would be collected for use of the same service image in a non-commercial or educational environment. As another example, pricing information may specify tiered pricing, such that heavy users of a service image may be charged a lower per-use fee. In still more embodiments, a provider may negotiate individual pricing information to be used for specific customers of a service image or service images. For example, individual contracts may exist or be created between a provider and each customer. One skilled in the art will appreciate that various implementations may accommodate such individualized contracts. For example, the provider may modify pricing information on a per customer basis (such as allowing a specified customer to access unlimited instances without fee).
A provider may further specify parameters for a pricing structure via input boxes 328 and 330, such as the amount of the monthly subscription rate and the hourly usage fee. In some embodiments, input boxes 328 and 330 may only appear when the input of input box 326 indicates they are required. Where input box 326 indicates that different or additional pricing information is required, alternate input boxes may appear. In some embodiments, one or more of the above inputs may not be required. In other embodiments, additional input information may be provided. For example, a provider may specify a graphic which should be associated with the provided service image. After all necessary information has been input, submission may be completed by selecting the input control 332. Accordingly, the provider may activate the input control 332 to cause the provider computing device 150 to transmit the service image and corresponding information to the marketplace server 112. As discussed above, the marketplace server 112 may then submit the received information to the electronic catalog 116.
With reference to
With continued reference to
With reference to
Illustrative display features 538 and 540 depict still more information regarding the “Paul's Database” service image. Display feature 538 depicts statistical information related to current or previously launched instances of “Paul's Database,” including the number of installations of the service image which have occurred, the average uptime of the installed service images (which may correspond with a reliability of the service image), the typical type of computing device on which the service image is launched, and the typical number of instances of the service image which are launched by a customer. Display feature 540 depicts individual reviews generated by users of the service image marketplace regarding “Paul's Database.” Each review may have information such as a rating of the service image on a given scale, and an authored comment portion regarding the service image. In some embodiments, additional or alternative display features may be depicted regarding a service image.
With reference to
Though described above with reference to a service image, in some embodiments, the user interface 500 may describe details regarding service image components. These components may correspond to applications which can be included within a customized service image. In these embodiments, the electronic service image marketplace 100 may be configured to receive, from a customer, a selection of one or more service image components, and create a service image containing the selected components for execution on a selected hosted computing environment.
With reference to
Input box 606 enables the customer to select a version of the service image that is to be launched. Multiple versions of the same service image may be provided for various reasons, such as cost, reliability, or interoperability. In some embodiments, only a single version of a service image may be available. In such embodiments, the customer may not be able to alter input box 606, or input box 606 may not be displayed. Input box 608 enables the customer to configure and select the type of instance on which the service image is to be launched. In the current example, the selected hosting environment, “Hosted Web Services Catalog—US (WEST),” allows both large and small instances to be launched. For the purposes of example, a large instance may correspond to a computing device or virtual machine with more processing power, more random access memory, or more data storage. A small instance may, conversely, have a smaller amount of processing power, memory, or storage. As such, a small instance may correspond to a lower hourly usage fee than the large instance. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, a variety of types of instances may be presented to the user. In some embodiments, only a single instance type may be available, and the user may not be presented with a selection. In still more embodiments, instance types may vary based on the selected hosted computing environment, and as such, the input box 608 may be substituted for alternative input boxes reflecting the instance types available on a selected hosted computing environment.
With continued reference to
With respect to
With respect to
Though not depicted in
With reference to
In the current example, each instance of a service image is identified by a unique instance identifier 810. These instance identifiers may be unique across all instances associated with a customer, across all instances hosted by a selected hosted computing environment, or across all instances launched via the service image marketplace. Function links 818 and 820 enable a customer to manage or access a specific instance of a service image. In the current example, function link 818 enables Chris Customer to manage instance “0000001” 810. Link 818 is selectable by Chris Customer to display management functions associated with the instance. For example, Chris Customer may activate or deactivate an instance of a service image, modify the type of computing device which is hosting the service image, or change other functions or features associated with the instance. Chris Customer can select link 820 in order to access the corresponding instance. In some embodiments, this access may be granted via an interface which allows API calls to be made to the instance. In other embodiments, a command terminal interface or graphical user interface may be provided in order to access the instance. One skilled in the art will appreciate that access to an instance of a hosted service image may be given in various additional ways. Display feature 822 depicts the current charges associated with usage of the service image. In the current example, Chris Customer has been assessed fees of $115.25 for use of the service image “Paul's Database.” These charges are reflective of all instances of the associated service image. In some embodiments, charges may reflect only fees associated with a particular instance of a service image (such that each instance displays individual charges). In still more embodiments, charges may reflect fees associated with all service images acquired by a customer. Chris Customer may select function link 824 to view details associated with the current charges, such as a detailed billing report. Such a detailed report may include, for example, timing of usage associated with the charges or assessed subscription fees.
With reference to
All of the processes described herein may be embodied in, and fully automated via, software code modules executed by one or more general purpose computers or processors. The code modules may be stored in any type of computer-readable medium or other computer storage device. Some or all the methods may alternatively be embodied in specialized computer hardware. In addition, the components referred to herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof.
Conditional language such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, are otherwise understood within the context as used in general to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise understood with the context as used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y and at least one of Z to each be present.
Any process descriptions, elements or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or elements in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown, or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/248,227 entitled ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACE FOR HOSTED SERVICE IMAGES, and filed Sep. 29, 2011, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4788637 | Tamaru | Nov 1988 | A |
5528490 | Hill | Jun 1996 | A |
5757908 | Cooper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5870717 | Wiecha | Feb 1999 | A |
6275227 | DeStefano | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6442448 | Finley et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6664981 | Ashe et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6718534 | Carter et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735768 | Tanaka | May 2004 | B1 |
6910071 | Quintero et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7047448 | Rao et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7096464 | Weinmann | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7165041 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7315830 | Wirtz et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7324969 | Pallister et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7370008 | Hill | May 2008 | B1 |
7424445 | Cue et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430528 | Perkowski | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433835 | Frederick et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466835 | Stenberg et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467206 | Moore et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7694293 | Rao | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7729954 | Frederick et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7729955 | Frederick et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747644 | Reihl et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7778874 | Saunders | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7797198 | Frederick et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7797271 | Bonneau et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7801771 | Sirota et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7908358 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7953642 | Dierks | May 2011 | B2 |
7958529 | Green et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7987449 | Marolia et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8005723 | Sirota et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8019652 | Frederick et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8019653 | Frederick et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8019660 | Westphal | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019725 | Mulligan et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8024225 | Sirota et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8185220 | Lloyd | May 2012 | B2 |
8214483 | Van Riel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8321949 | Green et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8352941 | Protopopov et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8442234 | Brown et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8543931 | Forstall et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544016 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555273 | Chia et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8601583 | Chandrasekhar et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8627426 | Lucovsky et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631397 | Brar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8713556 | Bozak et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8813065 | Zygmuntowicz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9092243 | Faus et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9288117 | Angrish et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9530156 | Tyra et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9626700 | Thimsen et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9667515 | Thimsen et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
10147123 | Golden et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10817929 | Tyra et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
20020032622 | Petit et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020085037 | Leavitt et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107718 | Morrill et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120461 | Kirkconnell-Ewing et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120519 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120529 | Buettgenbach et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030078897 | Florance et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030172174 | Mihalcheon | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030192029 | Hughes | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195813 | Pallister et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217357 | Parry | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040103412 | Rao et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122926 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143516 | Hastie et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040243583 | Olsen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010916 | Hagen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050039034 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050144616 | Hammond et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154759 | Hofmeister et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198677 | Lewis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256882 | Able et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289050 | Narayanan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060085785 | Garrett | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060200814 | Kontinen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060277542 | Wipfel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070022447 | Arseneau et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027987 | Tripp et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067297 | Kublickis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118530 | Chow et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130156 | U. Tenhunen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070233540 | Sirota | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233581 | Peter | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240154 | Gerzymisch et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070294399 | Grossner et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080034364 | Lam et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080396 | Meijer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098462 | Carter | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103975 | Taratino et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134162 | James et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168167 | Calrson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196000 | Fernandez-Ivern et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215492 | Pieper et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228592 | Kotas et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080301667 | Rao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301669 | Rao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301672 | Rao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037337 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090037492 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090100331 | Sauve et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100420 | Sapuntzakis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106748 | Chess et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112735 | Viehmann et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113413 | Reinz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119779 | Dean et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138380 | Roseman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171811 | Peter et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090235244 | Enomori et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241037 | Hyndman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249324 | Brar et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288082 | Nazeer et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300604 | Barringer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300641 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320014 | Sudhakar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100042484 | Sipes et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050172 | Ferris | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087184 | Stoev et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114739 | Johnston | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131084 | Van Camp | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131948 | Ferris | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153945 | Bansal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180272 | Kettler et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186007 | Jeong | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100262508 | Volnak | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262958 | Clinton et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274767 | Irisawa et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100306767 | Dehaan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004676 | Kawato | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110055714 | Vemulapalli et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110119191 | Stern et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126110 | Vilke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137805 | Brookbanks et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154320 | Verma | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173028 | Bond | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191453 | Gouge et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209185 | Cho et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213687 | Ferris et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214124 | Ferris et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218920 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110289499 | Haubold et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295998 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120054731 | Aravamudan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081395 | Adi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120246570 | Deluca et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120278229 | Vishwanathan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120278439 | Ahiska et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019016 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024851 | Firman et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085892 | Golden et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085899 | Tyra et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086383 | Galvao De Andrade et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130297922 | Friedman | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140109046 | Hirsch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140237182 | Venkatesh et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20170264514 | Thimsen et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2554462 | Aug 2005 | CA |
102299953 | Dec 2011 | CN |
103959317 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104115177 | Oct 2014 | CN |
2761555 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2761558 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2426362 | Nov 2006 | GB |
2003-044602 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2007-149096 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2010-277187 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2010-286925 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-118451 | Jun 2011 | JP |
4743726 | Aug 2011 | JP |
WO 2005072342 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2013049393 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013049395 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Tim Laseter and Christopher Capers, 2002, E-Marketplace Survival Strategies (Year: 2002). |
Balduzzi et al., A Security Analysis of Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud Service, 2012,Retrieved from the internet: <U RL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2240000/2232005/p1427 -balduzzi.pdt?, pp. 1427-1434. |
Doumae, K. Cloud in Japan—II Probation into Ability of GIO, Chapter 1—Cloud in Japan and IIJ GIO, G-Cloud Magazine, Japan, K.K. Gijutsu Hyoronsha, Sep. 10, 2010, pp. 100-101. |
Ebay, Inc.; Ebay Advertising Targeting homepage. 2012. Accessed Feb. 17, 2012. http://www.ebayadvertising.com/en/display-ads-targeting. 1 pg. |
Nakata, A., Close up, Nikkei computer, No. 789, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Aug. 18, 2011, pp. 68-75. |
Rackspace.com, “Managed Hosting Services on Dedicated Infrastructure”, 2009. |
Ranganathan et al., Advertising in a Pervasive Computing Environment, University of Illinois, 5 pages, Urbana, IL. |
Sforce 2.0-Industry's First On-Demand Application Server—Deployed Immediately to 120,000 Subscribers and 8400 Customers with Salesforce.com Winter ′04 Release, Business wire: 5278. Business Wire (Dec. 8, 2003). |
Shimizu, M., EC2/S3/EBS, Virtual Server Construction by Cloud Computing, 1st ed., Socym Co., Ltd., Shoichiro Takeda, Aug. 27, 2009, pp. 128-138. |
Taniguchi, T., Cloud in Japan—II Probation into Ability of GIO, Chapter 2—Using IIJ Cloud: It's Simple! Establishing the Web Server by Using the GIO Hosting Package, G-Cloud Magazine, Japan, K.K. Gijutsu Hyoronsha, Sep. 10, 2010, pp. 102-109. |
Taniguchi, T., Cloud in Japan—II Probation into Ability of GIO, Chapter 3—Full-Scale! Example of Structuring Using GIO Component Service—Encouraging Full-Scale Cloud Infrastructure with Parts Selected and Used, G-Cloud Magazine, Japan, K.K. Gijutsu Hyoronsha, Sep. 10, 2010, pp. 110-117. |
Wong et al., Java-based Mobile Agents, Mar. 1999, [Retrieved on Feb. 1, 2017]. Retrieved from the internet: <URL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/300000/295717/p92-wong.pdf?>, 11 Pages (92-102). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT/US2012/057624 dated Dec. 6, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received in PCT/US2012/057624 dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
Supplementary Search Report received in European Application No. 12834770.5 dated Apr. 10, 2015. |
Office Action in European Application No. 12834770.5 dated Jul. 25, 2017. |
Office Action received in Japanese Application No. 2014-533330 dated Mar. 2, 2015. |
Office Action received in Australian Application No. 2012315939 dated Mar. 10, 2015. |
Office Action received in Singapore Application No. 2014012645 dated Mar. 27, 2015. |
Notification of Grant received in Singapore Application No. 2014012645 dated Feb. 26, 2016. |
Office Action received in Canadian Application No. 2850008 dated May 19, 2015. |
Office Action received in Australian Application No. 2012315939 dated May 19, 2015. |
Office Action received in Chinese Application No. 201280047426.1 dated Apr. 29, 2016. |
Office Action received in Chinese Application No. 201280047426.1 dated Nov. 24, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT/US2012/057626 dated Dec. 24, 2012. |
Office Action received in Australian Application No. 2012315941 dated Mar. 10, 2015. |
Office Action received in Japanese Application No. 2014-533331 dated Feb. 23, 2015. |
Supplementary Search Report received in European Application No. 12835825.6 dated Jul. 14, 2015. |
Office Action in European Application No. 12835825.6 dated May 26, 2017. |
Office Action received in Canadian Application No. 2,850,011 dated Sep. 1, 2015. |
Office Action received in Canadian Application No. 2,850,011 dated Aug. 29, 2017. |
Office Action received in Japanese Application No. 2014-533331 dated Sep. 3, 2015. |
Office Action received in Russian Application No. 2014117208 dated Nov. 30, 2015. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 2012800472374 dated Aug. 23, 2016. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 2012800472374 dated Jun. 1, 2017. English Translation Not Yet Received. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2016-19779 dated Mar. 6, 2017. |
Office Action in Indian Application No. 3114/DELNP/2014 dated Jan. 23, 2019. |
Office Action in Brazilian Application No. BR1120140076286 dated Nov. 19, 2019. |
Office Action in Indian Application No. 3175/DELNP/2014 dated Jul. 11, 2019. |
Office Action in Brazilian Application No. BR1120140076308 dated Nov. 19, 2019. |
“Application Marketplace as a Service: A Reference Architecture for Application Marketplace Service,” by Shih-Fang Chang, Proceedings-International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing: 186-192, IEEE Computer Society (Dec. 1, 2010) (Year: 2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190228445 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13248227 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 16206535 | US |