1. Field of Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of parking meters and more particularly to electronic parking meters that can detect parked vehicles.
2. Description of Related Art
Parking meters permit vehicles to be parked on streets for an allowable time determined by the number and denominations of coins which are placed in the parking meter. A clock mechanism in the parking meter runs down the allowable time until it reaches zero, and an overtime parking indication appears.
It has been long recognized that if the parking meter were able to detect the presence or absence of the vehicle, either by mechanical means or wireless means, in the corresponding parking space, then among other things, the parking meter could be reset, thereby requiring the next patron to insert the appropriate amount of payment for his/her parking time. U.S. Pat. No. 3,015,208 (Armer); U.S. Pat. No. 3,018,615 (Minton et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 3,034,287 (Odom et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 3,054,251(Handley et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 3,064,416 (Armer); U.S. Pat. No. 3,535,870 (Mitchell); U.S. Pat. No. 3,999,372 (Welch); U.S. Pat. No. 4,043,117 (Maresca et al.); 4,183,205 (Kaiser); U.S. Pat. No. 4,823,928 (Speas); U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,425 (Turner); U.S. Pat. No. 4,908,617 (Fuller); U.S. Pat. No. 4,967,895 (Speas); U.S. Pat. No. 5,442,348 (Mushell); RE29,511 (Rubenstein).
Thus, the objective of any vehicle detection portion of the electronic parking meter is to, as reliably as possible and as inexpensively as possible, detect when there is and is not a vehicle in the corresponding parking space. In fact, experience has shown that unless vehicle detection is extremely reliable (99%+ in correctly identifying the presence/absence of a vehicle), the customer, i.e., cities and townships, will not invest in vehicle detecting parking meters. However, all of the above references suffer from one of many different problems and actually achieving this objective remains elusive. The reasons for not being able to implement such a working vehicle detector include: the uncertainty of the parking meter location and of the parking meter/space environment, vehicles that are parked too far back in the parking space, the smoothness of the surfaces of different vehicles, the “fast parker”, the inadvertent or intentional presence of a person in front of the meter and tampering with the meter including the vandalizing of the sensor itself. Furthermore, the vehicle-detecting parking meter must be able to provide a reliable vehicle-detection scheme that uses low power since the parking meter is a stand-alone device that does not have the luxury of using utility power.
In particular, the environment of the meter/space presents obstacles that must be recognized and compensated for, or distinguished, by the vehicle detector. For example, the road may be very steeply-crowned and an ultrasonic-based vehicle detector will receive reflections from the crowned road, and may erroneously conclude that a vehicle is in the corresponding parking space when there truly is no vehicle there. Another example, is that if trash bins, light posts, trees, sign posts, etc. are closely-adjacent the parking meter, almost any wireless vehicle detection scheme will be subjected to sufficient interferences from these, thereby causing the detector to make erroneous conclusions about the presence/absence of a vehicle in the parking space.
Even the sensor used to implement the vehicle detection suffers from its own respective drawbacks. For example, the use of RADAR (radio detection and ranging) suffers from such things as possible interferences from other RADAR-vehicle-detecting units, frequency band licensing concerns as well as cost. The use of optical sensors in vehicle detection (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,043,117 (Maresca)) suffer from receiving reflections that may vary from strong reflections (reflected off of vehicle glass) versus weak reflections (reflected off the body of a very dark-colored vehicle), which are hard to detect. Video camera/processing when used for vehicle detection (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,951 (Mitschele, et al.)) is not only very expensive but in those cases where the video camera is positioned to capture the front-end vehicle license plate, in those states where front-end vehicle license plates are not required, identification of the vehicle is thwarted. Thus, at present, use of ultrasonic sensors remains the most cost-effective means of detecting vehicles.
Prior art vehicle detecting parking meters utilizing a single ultrasonic sensor, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,407,049 (Jacobs), U.S. Pat. No. 5,454,461 (Jacobs), U.S. Pat. No. 5,570,771 (Jacobs), U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,119 (Jacobs), U.S. Pat. No. 5,852,411 (Jacobs et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,015 (Jacobs, et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,272 (Jacobs, et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,275,170 (Jacobs, et al.), operate where the ultrasonic sensor is energized with a pulse for emanating an interrogating signal towards the parking space and then the sensor waits to receive reflections. In particular, the reflections are examined to determine if they exceed a certain fixed threshold and, if so, the time measured between when the interrogating signal was sent until when the reflection was received is used to calculate a distance.
However, some of the problems with such a method are the following: certain vehicles disperse the interrogating signal, rather than returning a strong reflection; another problem is that to compensate for adjacent obstacles, e.g., crowned-street, tree, sign post, etc., the sensitivity of the sensor has to be reduced by raising the threshold but in doing so, even more vehicles are not properly detected; the reflected signals, or echos, are inherently unstable, i.e., the movement of air and even very minute physical movements in the environment make these signals unstable. Furthermore, some echos cancel other echos and exhibit multi-path problems, thus making the echos unstable.
Even where multiple ultrasonic sensors are used to detect vehicles, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 3,042,303 (Kendall et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 3,046,519 (Polster); U.S. Pat. No. 3,046,520 (Polster); U.S. Pat. No. 3,105,953 (Polster); U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,006 (Hermesmeyer); U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,682 (Boozer et al.), or other objects U.S. Pat. No. 5,761,155 (Eccardt et al.), the design is that at least one sensor acts as an ultrasonic transmitter and the remaining sensors act as the ultrasonic receivers. As a result, there is no teaching or suggestion that each sensor act as both a transmitter/receiver for a signal that monitors a particular portion of the parking space. Furthermore, low power operation of these system is not a concern.
Another problem that is encountered with such vehicle detection systems is a “fast-parker” scenario, i.e., a vehicle pulling into a parking space that has just been emptied but before the vehicle detector has determined that the first vehicle has departed. One solution proposed to this problem is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,455 (Yost, et al.) and which is also incorporated by reference herein. In that patent, three vehicle detecting sensors are provided in a housing that is located between an electronic parking meter and the coin vault. These sensors are directed downward and each sensor is focused on a different portion of the parking space. A verification process is used by an internal processor to provide a reliable determination as to whether a vehicle is present or not in the corresponding parking space.
With regard to low power electronic parking meters, British Publication No. 2077475 discloses a low power electronic parking meter that operates using solar cells. Furthermore, since the sophisticated electronic parking meters which use microprocessors, electronic displays and IR/ultrasonic transducers consume too much power to operate by non-rechargeable batteries alone, U.S. Pat. No. 4,967,895 (Speas) discloses the use of solar power cells which charge capacitors or rechargeable batteries. However, various problems exist with the use of solar power sources including the use of parking meters in shady areas, or the use of parking meters during periods in which there is very little sunlight. This causes the rechargeable batteries to run down, and they require frequent replacement. Or, in the case of the use of capacitors, the lack of power causes the meter to become inoperative.
Therefore, there remains a need a system and method for providing any electronic parking meter with the ability to detect the presence or the absence of a vehicle in any existing parking meter space, independent of the surrounding environment, as reliably as possible and as inexpensively as possible while using a minimum of power.
All references cited herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
An electronic parking meter mounted on a support (e.g., stanchion) anchored to the ground and adjacent a corresponding parking space. The electronic parking meter comprises: a stand-alone (e.g., self-sufficient as to power) electronic parking meter housing comprising a display and supporting electronics; a vehicle detecting sensor (e.g., an ultrasonic transducer) located on the support for detecting the presence or absence of a vehicle in a corresponding parking space, and wherein the sensor transmits signals wirelessly towards the parking space and for receiving reflections of the signals if a vehicle is present; a processor coupled to the vehicle detecting sensor for processing the reflections of the signals, wherein the processor is in communication with the supporting electronics for communicating the presence or absence of a vehicle in the corresponding parking space to the electronic parking meter; and wherein the supporting electronics, processor and vehicle detecting sensor are continuously enabled.
A method for automatically leasing, and displaying violations of, the use of a parking space. The method comprises the steps of: positioning a stand-alone electronic parking meter (e.g., self-sufficient as to power) having a display and supporting electronics including coin or payment card processors on a support (e.g., a stanchion) anchored to the ground and adjacent the parking space; positioning a vehicle detecting sensor on the support at a predetermined height above the ground, and wherein the vehicle detecting sensor and the supporting electronics are in communication with each other; orienting the vehicle detecting sensor for emitting wireless signals towards the parking space at a predetermined angle with respect to a horizontal reference, and wherein the vehicle detecting sensor also receives any reflections of the emitted wireless signals; processing the received reflections to determine the presence or absence of a vehicle in the parking space and informing the supporting electronics of the presence or absence of a vehicle in the parking space; and continuously enabling the electronic parking meter and vehicle detecting sensor.
The following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings:
a is the reflected signal characteristic when no vehicle is detected in the corresponding parking space;
b is the reflected signal characteristic when the vehicle detecting sensor is being tampered with, such as placing a finger or hand over the sensor;
Certain terminology is used herein for convenience only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the present invention. In the drawings, the same reference letters are employed for designating the same elements throughout the several figures.
It should be understood that the invention of the present application is an improvement over that of U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,455 (Yost, et al.) and whose entire disclosure is incorporated by reference herein. In general, one of the key improvements of the present invention over the invention disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,455 (Yost, et al.) is the use and placement of a single vehicle detecting sensor 421 rather than the use of three such sensors adjacent the parking meter housing. Furthermore, the present invention does not use an optical tamper system as also disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,455 (Yost, et al.).
Unlike known stand-alone parking meters that claim to detect vehicles, the present invention 420 is always enabled. In particular, the electronic parking meter assembly 20 and the vehicle detecting sensor 421 work together to check for vehicle presence or absence. Therefore, they do not require that coins or a payment card be inserted to activate the parking meter and its vehicle detecting capability. The continuously enabled feature is important because the parking meters of the present invention 420 are “stand-alone” types. As used throughout this Specification, the term “stand-alone” means that the EPMA 20/and vehicle detecting sensor 421 are not hard-wired to any utility power. For example, the EPMA 20/vehicle detecting sensor 421 may include on-board power such as batteries, fuel cells, solar cells, wind power, etc. In other words, the present invention 420 must be self-sufficient and therefore must operate to conserve or minimize power consumption while accurately detecting incoming or departing vehicles and displaying the appropriate purchased time or violation indicators.
The operative part of the electronic parking meter assembly, hereinafter known as the EPMA 20 is positioned inside a housing 12; examples of such electronic parking meters, by way of example only, are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,418 (Yost); U.S. Pat. No. 6,275,170 (Jacobs, et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,015 (Jacobs, et al.); or U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,119 (Jacobs); however, it should be understood that any electronic parking meter would suffice. By way of example only, the EPMA 20 (see
An electronic display (e.g., LCD, LED, etc.) 23 can be seen through the lens 17, as well as three LEDs 50A-50C mounted therein which can be used for indicating various parking meter conditions to parking authority personnel.
As shown in
Similarly, the vehicle detecting sensor 421 is mounted at in the stanchion 14 at a predetermined height H (see
Where the intermediate housing 416 is used, it is secured between the EPMA housing 12 and the vault 13 using a plurality of bolts 48A-48D (
Furthermore, coins or payment cards (e.g., debit cards, credit cards, smart cards, etc.) can be inserted in respective apertures (see
As mentioned earlier, the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422 comprises microcomputer (μC) 340, memory 342, related circuitry 417 and the vehicle detecting sensor (e.g., ultrasonic transducer) 421 (
The memory 342 stores the operational parameters of the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422. For example, the memory stores the baseline signals, (e.g., the transducer signal corresponding to an empty parking space), reference parameters, transducer frequency data, etc. In addition, the memory can be updated or modified through the EPMA 20 via using the “vehicle-detected” line 356. In particular, when the baseline signals are obtained for the sensor 421, parking meter personnel control that process via a hand-held unit (not shown) that communicates with the EPMA 20 and ultimately with the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422.
The vehicle detecting sensor 421 (e.g., an ultrasonic transducer) operates at a nominal frequency, e.g., 40 kHz. To ensure that all possible situations of environmental changes do not affect the vehicle detection processing, the μC 340 excites the sensor 421 at a slightly higher and lower frequency around the nominal frequency. However, in the baseline case, to detect a vehicle at all, only the nominal frequency is monitored.
The μC 340 controls the activation of the sensor 421. It should be understood that the phrase “activating the sensor” as used in this patent application means: (1) energizing the transducer; (2) listening for the reflection; and (3) processing the reflection by the μC 340. By way of example, and not limitation, the energization phase is approximately 1 msec, the listening phase is approximately 14-16 msec and the processing phase is approximately 20 msec. Thus, “activating the sensor (or transducer)” is approximately a 40 msec process.
a-7b depict the flowchart for the μC 340. In particular, in step 480 the μC 340 activates the sensor 421 by pulsing it each second. In step 482, the μC 340 determines whether the sensor 421 has detected a reflected signal RS above a predetermined threshold (e.g., the noise level). If not, the μC 340 returns to pulsing the sensor 421 every second. If the reflected signal RS does exceed the predetermined threshold, in step 484 the μC 340 waits to see if the sensor 421 receives a predetermined number (e.g., three) of consecutive reflected signals RS above the predetermined threshold. If not, the μC 340 returns to pulsing the sensor 421 every second. If the μC 340 determines that a predetermined number (e.g., three) of consecutive reflected signals RS above the predetermined threshold has been received, then in step 486 the μC 340 sets the vehicle detected line 356. With a vehicle detected in the corresponding parking space PS, the μC 340 now monitors the parking space PS to see if the vehicle has departed. This is accomplished by again pulsing the sensor 421 every second as shown in step 488 and determining whether a reflected signal below the predetermined threshold has been returned in step 490. If there is no reflected signal RS below the predetermined threshold, then the μC 340 considers the vehicle still present (as shown in step 492) and then continues to pulse the sensor 421 every second as shown in step 488. However, if one reflected signal RS is detected, then it is necessary to first determine if there is any tampering being conducted on the vehicle detecting sensor 421.
It has been found through testing, that where an emitted signal ES from the vehicle sensor 421 does not impact a vehicle, a reflected signal RS is returned below the threshold but with some initial perturbance in the reflected signal RS. This is shown in
The vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422 are discussed next. It should be noted that Table 1 below contains exemplary part numbers for the various electrical components. It should be understood that these components are listed for example only and that the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422 are not limited, in any manner, to only those components.
The voltage detecting sensor 421 has a transducer driver/listen circuit that is activated by the μC 340. A reflected-signal amplification (RSA) circuit 359 (
The driver path comprises the transformer T1 which is energized whenever the transistor Q3 is biased on by the μC 340. This energizes the transducer for emitting the 1 msec ultrasonic signal pulse. Once emitted, the transducer then “listens” for the reflection.
The listen path comprises the LM6134 amplifier coupled to the driver circuit. In particular, the listen path is through R14, R21 and C14 into the LM6134. The output of the LM6134 is coupled to the RSA circuit 359. The channel output (see R22 in
As discussed previously, the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422 can be reset automatically whenever the EPMA 20 is reset via the RESET line. In the alternative, if parking authority personnel need to reset the electronics 422 directly, there is a manually-operated switch SW (
It should be understood that the embodiment disclosed herein is exemplary only and that other components having higher resolution could be substituted herewith. However, bearing in mind that minimum power must be used since the parking meter 10 is a stand-alone unit, the above-described embodiment utilizes an 8-bit microcontroller (Microchip's PIC16C73-101/P) for the μC 340.
The sampling rate of the μC 340 is 3 samples/msec. Since sound travels at approximately 1 ft/msec and since only the return trip of the reflected signal is required (i.e., time of flight/2), in order to properly monitor a range of interest (e.g., approximately 0.5 feet to 8 feet) requires 6 samples/ft. Therefore, the activation of the transducer 421 results in 84 samples being temporarily stored in the μC 340 for processing, although only a portion of these (e.g., 48 samples) that fall within the range of interest are analyzed. When the parking meter 10 is first installed, the baseline signal (i.e., the reflected signal corresponding to an empty parking space) for the transducers 421 is obtained and are stored in the memory 342.
When the processor analyzes the received samples, it looks for those samples having the highest values that exceed the predetermined thresholds (which are modifiable by parking meter personnel through a hand-held programming unit, not shown, and the EPMA 20). These thresholds comprise values (e.g., 20 counts) above the baseline signals.
As stated earlier, the RESET line is provided so that the parking authority personnel can reset the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422 at the same time that they set the EPMA 20. In particular, the EPMA 20 may comprise an internal reset switch. Whenever, the parking authority personnel reset the EPMA 20 (e.g., when replacing the batteries in the EPMA 20), the internal reset switch in the EPMA 20 is activated and both the EPMA 20 and the vehicle detecting sensor processing electronics 422 are reset. Other than that, the RESET line is not used during normal operation.
Once the “vehicle detected” line 356 is set, the supporting electronics 21 then awaits payment by coin or payment card. A grace period (e.g., 5-10 minutes; this can be adjusted) is granted by the invention 420 from the time the “vehicle detected” line 356 is set. If the grace period is exhausted before payment is made and the vehicle V remains in the parking space PS, the display 23 and appropriate indicators 50A-50C display a violation. If, on the other hand, payment is received during the grace period, the display 23 displays the amount of purchased time and counts the time down in the conventional manner. If the amount of purchased time is reached and no further payment is made and the vehicle V remains in the parking space PS, the EPMA 20 displays the overtime as a negative value while indicating a violation, thereby leaving no question as to how much overtime has occurred should parking meter personnel issue a citation. If, on the other hand, the vehicle V departs the parking space PS before the purchased amount of time is exhausted, the vehicle detecting sensor 421 will inform the EMPA 20 of the departure by clearing the vehicle detect line 356. The EMPA 20 can be programmed to either zero the display 23 and await the next vehicle V; or alternatively, the EPMA 20 can be programmed to keep the paid-for time on the display 23 while still detecting the entry of a new vehicle and attributing the paid-for time to this new vehicle occupancy of the parking space PS. The decision to zero the display 23 or not is the decision of the municipality or other owner/licensee of the parking meters. In either case, the present invention 420 is capable of easily implementing either decision.
As mentioned earlier, the present invention 420 can be used in a double parking meter configuration as shown in
The term “user of the vehicle”, or “associated with the vehicle” or parking space is meant to include anyone who operates the vehicle being parked and/or feeds the corresponding parking meter.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the board inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention.