This application hereby expressly incorporates by reference as if fully set forth herein copending, concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/296,982, filed on Dec. 7, 2005, entitled “Owl With Spring Connected Head and Wind Activated Fin” by Jan L. Grandy.
This invention relates to predator replica designed to control pests, particularly unwanted birds that may destroy gardens, nest in gutters or parts of a structure, leave guano or various messes behind, etc.
Certain predator replicas, such as electronic owls, are used for controlling pests within a specific area, particularly unwanted birds that may destroy gardens, nest in gutters or parts of a structure, i.e. air conditioner vents, leave guano or various messes behind, etc. Current owl replicas are either stationary with no moving parts or have limited head movement, i.e. head rotation only. Known in the art are owl replicas having a body and head that generally correspond to the shape of a live owl, wherein the head is connected to the body by an unstable mount to allow for movement of the head. Some owl replicas comprise arms that move or open electronically. Other electronic owls are known in the art, for example, to have four sensors that detect motion occurring around electronic owl. The four motion sensors may be placed in an owl base similar as shown with respect to the electronic owl shown in
The present invention provides an electronic predator replica, such as an owl, having a plurality of sensors, with means for rotating a predator head through any angle within 360 degrees to the direction of a particular sensor that senses motion. Once the head reaches the direction of the sensor that senses motion, the head holds its position at the sensor for some time period (for example 10 seconds) before returning to is starting position. In one embodiment the starting position is offset from any sensor. The electronic predator head either rotates clockwise or counterclockwise to a sensor detecting motion depending upon the head starting position and the location of the sensor detecting motion. If the starting position of the head is less than 45 degrees from a sensor detecting motion, the head may move to the activating sensor in a direction that increases movement of head instead of rotating directly to the sensor. For example, the head may bypass the activating sensor, rotate to the next sensor, then return to the activating sensor, hold its position at the activating sensor for a selected period of time, i.e. ten seconds, then return to the starting position. The electronic predator may further comprise a noise device that simulates predator sounds. The noise device can be activated when motion is detected by one of the sensors. The noise device can create noise when head is at the angle of the activating sensor, and/or during rotation of head.
The electronic owl of the present invention departs from the conventional concepts and designs of the current art, and in doing so, provides an apparatus primarily developed for the purpose of deterring pests, particularly unwanted birds, from a specific area, by rotating a head in the direction of movement, i.e. an unwanted bird's movement, holding its position in the direction from which motion was sensed for a selected period of time, then returning to its starting position.
As described below, other features and variations can be implemented, if desired, and a related method can be utilized, as well.
It is noted that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments of the invention and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Referring to the drawings, the owl body of the present invention is similar in structure and appearance to the prior art predator replica shown in
In an effort to resemble a live owl such as for example a great horned owl, the electronic owl may include coloring, body, and feather contours of a live owl. Other possible features of the owl include two feet, two eyes, a beak, and two ear tufts that protrude on top of head 12. Any variety of aesthetic features may be utilized to more closely resemble an actual owl, however, as will be recognized from the disclosure herein the concepts described herein may be utilized without some or all of such aesthetic features.
In a one embodiment, when motion is detected by Sensor 34, Sensor 36, or Sensor 38, the owl head rotates clockwise to the sensor detecting motion, holds its position at that sensor location for a selected time period, for example ten seconds, then rotates counterclockwise to starting position 40. When motion is detected by Sensor 32, the owl head rotates counterclockwise from starting point 40 past Sensor 32 to Sensor 38, then rotates clockwise to Sensor 32, holds its position at Sensor 32 for ten seconds, then rotates clockwise to starting position 40. The head bypasses Sensor 32 before returning to Sensor 32 when motion is detected by Sensor 32 because the distance from starting position 40 to Sensor 32 is too short and does not allow for enough head movement or rotation for effective intimidation of unwanted birds. In other embodiments of the invention having more than four sensors, head rotation may be configured the same as described herein with a particular sensor having a close distance between sensor and starting position (for example less than 45 degrees) such that for some sensors detecting motion the head does not move directly to the location of motion following the shortest path of movement. More than one sensor may be set to be bypassed before head returns to sensor that detected motion. In an alternative embodiment, for sensors that are closely located to the starting head position the head may merely rotate in the clockwise or counterclockwise direction that results in more movement. For example, with regard to
It will be recognized that the specific implementation details of an electronic predator replica may be varied while still utilizing the advantageous techniques described herein. For example, the particular movements of the owl head described herein are exemplary. For example, when detecting motion the owl head may move and pause at a plurality of locations rather than merely at the location that corresponds to the direction of detected motion. For example, the head may move to and pause at a first intermediary location prior to moving to and pausing at the location corresponding to the direction of detected motion (or vice-versa). Further, additional movement and travel distance of the head could be added. Thus, for instance, rather than directly moving to a location of detected motion the head could, for example, move in a complete 360 degree rotation and then move directly to the location of the detected motion. Further, the movements provided herein with regard to counterclockwise and clockwise rotation are exemplary and the opposite movements could occur. In one general embodiment a technique is provided herein such that differentiation is provided between the motion sensors such that some sense of from which direction the detected motion is located can be determined. Then the movement of the owl head may be tailored to such direction. In this manner, at least two different motions of the owl head may be provided for at least two different detected motions. In a broad sense this could be a front detected vs. back detected motion or alternatively a left side vs. right side detected motion. As described above, in another embodiment at least four independent sensors may be utilized. Additional sensors, may however, also be utilized.
As provided above, the head of the owl is located at a starting point that does not correspond with a sensor. In general, the starting point may correspond to the normal resting location of a predator head with relation to the body design; however, the advantages of the techniques described herein may be obtained by using different starting points (or even changing starting points). In addition, though the starting point described above does not correspond to the location of one of the sensors alternative embodiments may be utilized. For example, the starting point and a motion sensor may be at same location. In such case, upon detection of movement at the starting point, the head may be provided with some movement and then return to the starting point. In yet another embodiment, the starting point may randomly vary.
In still another embodiment, the owl head may differentiate which of a plurality of motion sensors detected movement and then move to the location of that motion sensor from a starting point. Rather than merely pausing at the location of detected motion, the head may then stop at the location of detected motion such that the location is now the next starting point for the next event of detected motion.
The physical structure of the predator may be constructed in a wide range of manners. Further, drive motor, drive mechanism and electronics which couple the motion sensors and the drive motor may be constructed in a wide variety of manners. Further, the coupling of the owl head to the owl body may be accomplished in a wide variety of manners. For example, the body and head may be coupled with a drive shaft that only allows for rotational movement in one plane. However, the head and body may be coupled in a manner which allows for additional movement. For example, the owl may include a spring connection between the head and body for creating additional head movement similar, for example, as described with regard to the above mentioned copending, concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/296,982, filed on Dec. 7, 2005, entitled “Owl With Spring Connected Head and Wind Activated Fin” by Jan L. Grandy.
The electronic predator of the present disclosure may also optionally include a noise device (not shown) within the predator head and/or body. The noise device may initially be de-activated and then the noise device can be activated when motion is detected. The noise device could thus create noise immediately upon detecting motion, during the rotational movement of the predator head and/or when the predator head pauses at the location of detected movement. The noise device may simulate the natural sounds of the particular predator that is being replicated although other sounds may be utilized.
Further modifications and alternative embodiments of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this description. It will be recognized, therefore, that the present invention is not limited by these example arrangements. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the manner of carrying out the invention. It is to be understood that the forms of the invention herein shown and described are to be taken as the presently preferred embodiments. Various changes may be made in the implementations and architectures. For example, equivalent elements may be substituted for those illustrated and described herein and certain features of the invention may be utilized independently of the use of other features, all as would be apparent to one skilled in the art after having the benefit of this description of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
278461 | Screven | May 1883 | A |
954288 | Holloway | Apr 1910 | A |
1066045 | Pass | Jul 1913 | A |
1167502 | Huffman et al. | Jan 1916 | A |
D50230 | Cady | Jan 1917 | S |
1286380 | Matthews | Dec 1918 | A |
1287968 | Greenleaf | Dec 1918 | A |
D54456 | Rush | Feb 1920 | S |
2196078 | Pearce | Apr 1940 | A |
2545801 | Wrazen | Mar 1951 | A |
2575252 | Berger | Nov 1951 | A |
2689431 | Beebe | Sep 1954 | A |
2722195 | Rockafeller | Nov 1955 | A |
3085545 | Ore | Apr 1963 | A |
3290817 | Kravath | Dec 1966 | A |
D214278 | Thompson | May 1969 | S |
3487569 | Mendall | Jan 1970 | A |
3526991 | Goldfarb et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3540150 | Kosicki et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3566535 | Handler et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3735514 | Asder | May 1973 | A |
3818630 | May | Jun 1974 | A |
4038639 | Kuebler | Jul 1977 | A |
4131079 | Rousseau, Jr. et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4239825 | Kaulfuss et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4597357 | LeMessurier | Jul 1986 | A |
4734074 | Kinberg et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4893428 | Gagnon, Sr. | Jan 1990 | A |
5112265 | Naum | May 1992 | A |
5274942 | Lanius | Jan 1994 | A |
5289654 | Denny et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5450063 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
D366451 | Farstad | Jan 1996 | S |
5892446 | Reich | Apr 1999 | A |
5901491 | Caldwell | May 1999 | A |
5966075 | Blanks | Oct 1999 | A |
6092322 | Samaras | Jul 2000 | A |
6149490 | Hampton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6407670 | Dysarsz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6575597 | Cramer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7025655 | Chase | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20040116042 | Emoff | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060119482 | Hanscom | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2282518 | Apr 1995 | GB |
63317037 | Dec 1988 | JP |
06292495 | Oct 1994 | JP |
2002078440 | Mar 2002 | JP |
WO 2003059058 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070125294 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |