The ability for users to place a wide variety of orders quickly and accurately is vital to the success of an electronic medical records system designed for the acute care setting. If placing electronic orders is too time consuming or involves too much repetitious entry of order parameters, the electronic health care system loses usability and accuracy, which can lower the efficiency of a healthcare enterprise and even compromise the quality of patient care.
Physicians, nurses, clerks, and ancillary staff working in acute care settings must often place a large number of complex orders at once. The care of each patient is likely to require many orders of a number of different types, including medications, blood tests, and nurse interventions. In addition, acute care workflows lead many clinicians to enter orders for multiple patients at the same time after conducting patient rounds, which further increases the need for efficient order entry.
Orders in an acute care setting frequently require the specification of complex order parameters, such as frequency, interval, count, dose, and route, that are a challenge to communicate effectively in any ordering system, even a traditional paper ordering system. A nurse intervention order may tell the nurse to check a patient's vital signs every hour for 24 hours, then to take vitals four times per day for the next two days. Or it may ask that blood levels be tested every two hours until normal levels are reached and then every four hours up to a count of eight times. Electronic ordering systems for both ambulatory and acute care settings have usually relied on the selection of an order from a database, followed by text entry of order parameters on a number of windows for each order before it is filed. In the acute care setting, such entry methods are likely to inhibit regular use of the ordering system or even any use at all, because staff find it too cumbersome to enter order parameters by hand on more than one window for every order.
While these order parameters may be very complex, the likely parameter values for a given order generally belong to a predictable set. In few cases does care require the entry of an order “from scratch” with parameters that cannot be anticipated. A physician is likely to place many orders for patient vitals with similar frequencies at similar intervals. Therefore, text entry of electronic orders not only creates a repetitious workflow that needlessly adds time to the task of order entry, but it fails to take advantage of the ease with which many parameters can be selected from a set of pre-defined common values for the order. In addition, text entry of order parameters increases the likelihood of written error or miscommunication of what are in fact routinely selected values.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention an interactive, graphical user interface presents user-specific lists of orders grouped into types. When the user clicks an order sentence corresponding to that order appears. The user then clicks on the sentence to open an expanded order editing box accompanied by a set of buttons and selection lists encompassing the parameters that must be defined for the order and the most common values for those parameters. To facilitate quick order entry, the entire order entry process can be conducted with the mouse or another pointing device, by selecting the order via a check box and specifying all parameters by clicking buttons and selection lists.
The list of orders, order parameters, and default values can be configured by the users of the enterprise employing apparatus and methods according to preferred embodiments of the invention, in order to reduce the time spent searching for options that are routinely used. Orders can also be grouped and order parameters can be populated by default information on the basis of user preference and history of care for the patient. For example, a user may create order sets containing the orders commonly placed when admitting a patient with a respiratory condition. Alternatively, if a patient has been diagnosed with a specific condition in the past, a system defined order set may appear for the user containing defaults recommended for a patient with the condition.
Order parameters include priority, frequency, dose, route, interval, start and end dates, and count, but they can be extended to include other parameters users want to define for orders. In addition, each order can be configured to contain “condition” buttons, accommodating highly complex order parameters, such as one frequency for an order lasting a specified interval, followed by a different frequency, which lasts for a successive interval. Other condition options can allow users to specify a sequence of orders or to alternate between two orders for specified intervals. As with the order parameters, the condition options are extendible to meet user needs.
As the user selects options for order parameters, the parameter values currently selected appear in a dynamically generated summary sentence at the top of the order editing box. The summary sentence serves several purposes. It clarifies the selections the user has made and shows how the order parameters will appear to the staff member who receives the order. The summary sentence also helps the user keep track of the often complex succession of intervals or conditions selected for the order, in order to reduce the potential for medical error and ensure that the order is properly specified and communicated.
In addition, a variety of decision support alerts can be associated with orders, warning users of factors in patient care that may affect the decision to place the order, such as duplicate orders for the patient or dangerous medication interactions. These decision support options can be configured to locate any important information stored in the enterprise's database repository and present it to the user when the order is selected. Thus, decision support for orders is highly configurable and can provide the user with reports containing procedure instructions, previous order values recorded for the patient, access to clinical reference and enterprise-defined procedure instructions and guidelines for the order, or any other stored information the enterprise wants to present to a user selecting the order.
The user can select as many orders as desired for the patient in one session of use from the single “Order Composer” Window provided. All editing of order parameters can be performed within an expanded order editing box, which appears for each selected order. Only one order editing box is expanded at a time, and when the user clicks another order, the current order's box collapses, saving all the current values and displaying them beside the order in the form of the summary sentence. The user can return to edit any order at any time until the orders for the session are filed. When the desired orders and parameters have been selected, all the order information assembled can be filed simultaneously with a single button click into the database and undergo order transmittal processing. This order transmittal processing can be configured to send order information in a variety of formats to a variety of destinations, including interfaces, faxes, printers, and a comprehensive messaging system that links staff mail boxes, staff worklists, networked terminals, and enterprise mail box pools.
The invention may be implemented as part of an enterprise-wide integrated electronic medical records (EMR) system that is designed to serve large-scale health care enterprises. Therefore, the invention has practical use with the extensive data repositories, network of workstation terminals, and numerous concurrent users employed by such large enterprises.
The EMR graphical user interface 110 presents the user with the order entry activity 134, which is one activity within the larger EMR system 110. The EMR graphical user interface 110 is generated by the order display engine 112, and is displayed to the user via a suitable display device or devices (not shown). The order entry activity 134 contains: an activity list bar 145 listing possible activities that may be undertaken in connection with the current patient, a patient information header 147 that displays identifying and other patient related information about the current patient and an order type navigation bar 136, displaying the list of various order types 138. When the user clicks an order type 138, the list of orders 140 belonging to that order type 138 is displayed in the order composer window 142. When a user clicks an order from the list 140, a sentence statement of the order appears. The user then clicks on the sentence to open an expanded order editing box 144 in the order composer window 142, allowing the user to define all order parameters 146 necessary for the order, as defined by the enterprise employing the invention. The user selects an order from a user-specific list causing the order sentence to appear. By clicking on the sentence, the user then causes the expanded order editing box 144 to appear. Decision support information 122, such as procedure instructions, order alternatives, and formulary options alert the user to import information when the order is selected. When the user has selected all desired orders and parameters, a single button click files the order information assembled in the order composer window 142. The order parameters 146 the user selects for the order appear in the dynamically generated summary sentence 148 at the top of the order editing box 144. All selected orders can be filed simultaneously by clicking the file orders button (not depicted) in the order entry activity toolbar 150.
The invention has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments. It will be appreciated that the invention may otherwise be embodied without departing from the fair scope of the invention defined by the following claims.
The present invention claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 (e) to provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/257,971, filed Dec. 22, 2000 and relates generally to health record management, and more particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for collecting and communicating clinical order information in an acute care setting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4591974 | Dornbush et al. | May 1986 | A |
4667292 | Mohlenbrock et al. | May 1987 | A |
4839806 | Goldfischer et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4893270 | Beck et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4962475 | Hernandez et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5072383 | Brimm et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5072412 | Henderson, Jr. et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5072838 | Price, Jr. et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077666 | Brimm et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5088981 | Howson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101476 | Kukla | Mar 1992 | A |
5253362 | Nolan et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5301105 | Cummings, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5319543 | Wilhelm | Jun 1994 | A |
5325478 | Shelton et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5361202 | Doue | Nov 1994 | A |
5428778 | Brookes | Jun 1995 | A |
5471382 | Tallman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5546580 | Seliger et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557515 | Abbruzzese et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5574828 | Hayward et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5596752 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603026 | Demers et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5666492 | Rhodes et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5692125 | Schloss et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5724584 | Peters et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740800 | Hendrickson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748907 | Crane | May 1998 | A |
5751958 | Zweben et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758095 | Albaum et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760704 | Barton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772585 | Lavin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778346 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781442 | Engleson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781890 | Nematbakhsh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802253 | Gross et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823948 | Ross, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832450 | Myers et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833599 | Schrier et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838313 | Hou et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842976 | Williamson | Dec 1998 | A |
5845253 | Rensimer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848393 | Goodridge et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848395 | Edgar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850221 | Macrae et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867688 | Simmon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867821 | Ballantyne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899998 | McGauley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915240 | Karpf | Jun 1999 | A |
5924074 | Evans | Jul 1999 | A |
5929851 | Donnelly | Jul 1999 | A |
5946659 | Lancelot et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960406 | Rasansky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974389 | Clark et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983210 | Imasaki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997446 | Stearns | Dec 1999 | A |
5997476 | Brown | Dec 1999 | A |
5999916 | Peters et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014631 | Teagarden et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016477 | Ehnebuske et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021404 | Moukheibir | Feb 2000 | A |
6029138 | Khorasani et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037940 | Schroeder et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047259 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063026 | Schauss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067523 | Bair et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081786 | Barry et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082776 | Feinberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6139494 | Cairnes | Oct 2000 | A |
6154726 | Rensimer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6182047 | Dirbas | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188988 | Barry et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6263330 | Bessette | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275150 | Mandler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283761 | Joao | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289368 | Dentler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304905 | Clark | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317719 | Schrier et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332167 | Peters et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345260 | Cummings, Jr. et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6401072 | Haudenschild et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415275 | Zahn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6757898 | Ilsen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20010016056 | Westphal et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016853 | Kucala | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049610 | Hazumi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051888 | Mayhak, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056433 | Adelson et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001375 | Alcott et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020001387 | Dillon | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002473 | Schrier et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002535 | Kitchen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007287 | Straube et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020062229 | Alban et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020188478 | Breeland et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030061072 | Baker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110059 | Janas, III et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030200726 | Rast | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9627163 | Sep 1996 | WO |
PC-WO 9813783 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO- 9813783 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9922330 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-9941682 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO-9944162 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-9963473 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0028460 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0029983 | May 2000 | WO |
PC-WO 0029983 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0065522 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0229664 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020080189 A1 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60257971 | Dec 2000 | US |