Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an electronic system for power/energy consumption management of one or more domestic appliances, which is routinely informed on actual energy tariff through a network control unit.
Description of the Related Art
JP-A-2000214186 discloses a power consumption management apparatus for enterprise with an electronic unit that measures total amount of power consumed by electrical equipment. EP-A-1136829 discloses a process for measuring the energy consumption of a plurality of appliances connected to a power network in which each switching-on or switching-off of each appliance is detected through a specific high frequency signal injected in the network. DE-A-3935102 discloses a process for varying the load on a power system by injecting signals into the system using an audio frequency signal generator.
Daily energy demand isn't flat; peaks of energy are generated during the day which creates variable demand and increases a utility company's charge to consumers. To avoid dangerous blackouts utility companies are searching for ways to smooth energy demand by offering advantages to customers who are able to control their power consumption.
Consequently, it would be advantageous to design a new generation of appliances that are able to manage power consumption with different tariffs on the base of signed power supply contract.
One of the aims of the present invention is to implement a power management system to help the consumer in saving energy and money. Another object of the present invention is to make the user aware of potential energy cost savings in selecting different delayed switch-on times for each appliance. A further object of the present invention is to provide a system which comprises a user interface through which the user may also input a predetermined energy cost saving target referred to a certain fixed time (week, month), the system being able to select the proper times for switching-on the appliances in order to get the energy-savings target.
The electronic system according to the invention is characterized by the features listed in the appended claims. Thanks to such features, the electronic system according to the invention may:
The electronic system according to the present invention may also be able to interact with the utility company information center (thorough power line or TLC) to routinely collect information about contract terms and restrictions like daily/weekly/monthly/seasonally tariffs, peak limit and/or penalty.
In another embodiment, the electronic system may be able to negotiate with the utility company backend for a possible reduction of energy consumption in front of unplanned lack of power.
The electronic system according to the invention is preferably linked to so called “intelligent plugs” (i.e. plugs which can interrupt electrical supply to appliances on the basis of a specific signal on the power network) in agreement with priorities fixed by the user.
The electronic system may comprise the following hardware subsystems:
The present invention will be described in details with reference to the appended drawings in which:
With reference to
The “on line” functionality supports the customer through the display associated to the electronic system, in defining the initial settings of the system like:
The “run time” functionality of the power management algorithm may perform at least the following activities:
1) Start of appliance. Each appliance before starting a program cycle asks for the authorization to the power management algorithm. The algorithm checks the actual energy consumption and verifies if the requested energy is available. When the requested energy is not available, the power management algorithm is able to negotiate with the appliance the possibility to run an energy cost saving function or to force the start of an alternative energy cost saving function. An alternative scenario can be that the power management algorithm stops (or pauses) low priority appliances in order to have enough energy to fulfil the request of higher priority device.
2) The energy consumption is higher than the security threshold. When the power management algorithm detects a high level of energy consumption, (over the security threshold), the algorithm may stop or pause the appliances or functions inside appliance with lower priority level. After a defined time and a complete disconnection of the appliances with priority 1, if the energy consumption is not yet below the security threshold the algorithm starts the procedure to start or pause the appliances with priority 2.
As highlighted in
A “smart” appliance with power management (PM) features is able to provide the PM functionality also in a stand-alone mode. In fact in this case, the appliance is able to collect the actual energy consumption and manage the transaction to the status (i.e. normal function, energy cost saving function, pause and delayed start) as required by the energy availability. In addition, the smart appliances with PM features is able to coordinate its interventions with the global management led by the electronic system opening a negotiation cycle to maximize the appliances performances relatively to the available energy.
On the contrary, an “intelligent” appliance without PM features is able to provide the PM functionality only interacting with the electronic system hosted by a “smart” appliance or by a specific stand-alone device. The PM algorithm running in the electronic system is able to drive the appliances not only providing the start, stop and pause command but also running energy cost saving functions.
The electronic system can be used with traditional (or non-intelligent) appliances since these can be controlled by intelligent plugs and can participate actively to the PM process. Each intelligent plug is able to provide on/off functionality and if possible, to drive the energy consumption with continuous power regulation.
The electronic system can host a set of software algorithms that can run on different devices placed in house network or outside but “on line” connected. Examples of “in house” devices are:
Alternatively, the PM algorithm can be also distributed on separated devices (for example the “on line” functionality can be on a PC to make easier the user interaction while the “run time” functionality can be hosted inside an appliance).
Warnings and alarms are foreseen every time that the PM algorithm detects a critical event, interacts with the appliances to avoid dangerous situation or finds problems to complete the forecasted daily/weekly energy-saving plan. These messages can be displayed in different ways on different devices for example:
When the electronic system is hosted in a “smart” appliance, the related software is essentially composed by:
The NMT program starts at first time the user uses the appliance. This shell announces the appliance to the other smart appliances already working in the house (community) and integrates itself on the home network environment. The main goal of this software is to maintain the list of smart appliances that are working in the house, built the priority list and share the real time data to other software layers. The main goal of the “smart application” software shell is to avoid power shutdown reducing the instant power consumption before to reach the power peak limit or critical situations.
This application, before starting a working cycle of the appliance, checks if there is enough energy to avoid shutoff and eventually asks to other smart appliances, with lower priority, to reduce their power consumption.
The “smart application” software can support innovative services to increase the customer satisfaction likes:
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention (
Pressing the ‘selector’ key on the appliance, the display scrolls through a variety of opportunities showing the corresponding charges (Euro, $/cent or other currency). The user accepts a selection by pressing the usual ‘start’ key. The appliance will start its working based on the time (the input can be a delay time or the time on which the appliance has to start actually its program) and corresponding charge that was displayed.
The user interface may show the delay or the time when will start the service.
The optional ‘remote’ key is preferably added to permit the remote control feature and check the status of the appliance from cellular phone or browsing by Internet connection.
To explain more in detail the user interface, reference is made to its implementation in a washer (
The customer sets the washing cycle by turning the program knob of the washer (not shown). Next, the selector key S is pressed and the user interface (UI) shows the charge C if the washing program is started immediately (delay=00—upper part of
By pressing the selector key S again, the application program evaluates and shows the first alternative to save money.
Middle portion of
The new alternative suggests to wait 8 hours and 20 min and to pay only 20 eurocents (about $0.23) for the washing cycle. Again, the customer can accept by pressing ‘start’ or select the first option by pressing the ‘Selector’ key again.
If the user presses more times the selector key the display scrolls between the alternatives.
The user accepts a selection by pressing the ‘start’ key. Then, the appliance will start running based on the time and corresponding charge that was displayed.
The introduction of the home electronic system for power consumption management provides benefits to both the utility company and customer.
The utility company takes advantages mainly from the possibility to interact “on line” with the house controlling actively the energy consumption in order to avoid the peaks and balance the energy demand during the day. This can be done by the utility company in two different interaction levels:
I. By sharing the home energy consumption value and the contract limits forcing the electronic system to maintain the energy demand under the upper limit.
II. By disconnecting more appliances in more houses. The electronic system represents the device to interface the home and negotiate switch off or energy cost saving functions for the connected appliances.
The main customer benefits are:
The PM system is able to find the best planning taking into account the user needs and the energy cost tariffs imposed by the utility company.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02011668 | May 2002 | EP | regional |
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/447,359, filed May 29, 2003, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 02011668.7, filed May 31, 2002, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3925680 | Dixon | Dec 1975 | A |
4075699 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4090088 | McMahon et al. | May 1978 | A |
4168491 | Phillips et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4216384 | Hurley | Aug 1980 | A |
4247786 | Hedges | Jan 1981 | A |
4293915 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4324987 | Sullivan, II et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4336462 | Hedges et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4399510 | Hicks | Aug 1983 | A |
4472640 | Elmer | Sep 1984 | A |
4476398 | Hallam | Oct 1984 | A |
4612619 | Culp | Sep 1986 | A |
4771185 | Feron et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4819180 | Hedman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829159 | Braun et al. | May 1989 | A |
4847781 | Brown, III et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4847782 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4933633 | Allgood | Jun 1990 | A |
4998024 | Kirk et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5017799 | Fishman | May 1991 | A |
5168170 | Hartig | Dec 1992 | A |
5272585 | Gibbs | Dec 1993 | A |
5359540 | Ortiz | Oct 1994 | A |
5414640 | Seem | May 1995 | A |
5424903 | Schreiber | Jun 1995 | A |
5436510 | Gilbert | Jul 1995 | A |
5481140 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483656 | Oprescu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5502339 | Hartig | Mar 1996 | A |
5506790 | Nguyen | Apr 1996 | A |
5543667 | Shavit et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544036 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579201 | Karageozian | Nov 1996 | A |
5581132 | Chadwick | Dec 1996 | A |
5659601 | Chelog | Aug 1997 | A |
5675503 | Moe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5754445 | Jouper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761083 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5828737 | Sawyer | Oct 1998 | A |
5831345 | Michaud | Nov 1998 | A |
5844326 | Proctor et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880677 | Lestician | Mar 1999 | A |
6018690 | Saito et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018726 | Tsumura | Jan 2000 | A |
6028977 | Newsome | Feb 2000 | A |
6111762 | Igarashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6150955 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169964 | Aisa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177739 | Matsudaira et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178393 | Irvin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181985 | O'Donnell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195018 | Ragle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216956 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6252883 | Schweickart et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6301674 | Saito et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329616 | Lee | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6369643 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6487509 | Aisa | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493643 | Aisa | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519509 | Nierlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535859 | Yablonowski et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6583521 | Lagod et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590304 | Manning et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591253 | Dinkin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603218 | Aisa | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621179 | Howard | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622097 | Hunter | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624532 | Davidow et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631622 | Ghent et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633823 | Bartone et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6681154 | Nierlich et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6718214 | Schoettle et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734806 | Cratsley, III | May 2004 | B1 |
6741442 | McNally et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745106 | Howard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751562 | Blackett et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6795707 | Martin et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6839717 | Motoyama et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6861621 | Ghent | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6862498 | Davis et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868293 | Schurr et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885915 | Rehtanz et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891478 | Gardner | May 2005 | B2 |
6904385 | Budike, Jr. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931003 | Anderson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940272 | Niv | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961642 | Horst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6988375 | Bashark | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010363 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034707 | Aisa | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039532 | Hunter | May 2006 | B2 |
7058524 | Hayes et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069117 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110832 | Ghent | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7280893 | Spool et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7324876 | Ying | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7370013 | Aziz et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7373222 | Wright et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7406364 | Andren et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7478251 | Diab et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7738999 | Petite | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20010049846 | Guzzi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019758 | Scarpelli | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019802 | Malme et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020162032 | Gundersen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030036822 | Davis et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055776 | Samuelson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030168389 | Astle et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187550 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233201 | Horst et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040043754 | Whewell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078154 | Hunter | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083112 | Horst | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133314 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153170 | Santacatterina et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040235451 | Whewell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050097902 | Kwon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116543 | Merdjan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050280969 | Reynolds | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280970 | Reynolds | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060060512 | Astle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070130278 | Baek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080272934 | Wang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090187499 | Mulder et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100023174 | Nagata et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023786 | Liberman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100101254 | Besore et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100141046 | Paik | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100268579 | Momoh | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110025519 | Donaldson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029141 | Sun et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035071 | Sun et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120078690 | Harriman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095606 | Besore et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095608 | Murakami et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109392 | Hanks et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109397 | Shim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3935102 | Apr 1990 | DE |
19541869 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19824168 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19850496 | May 2000 | DE |
0620631 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1136829 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2095879 | Oct 1982 | GB |
2000214186 | Aug 2000 | JP |
0227687 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03094321 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Household Response to Incentive Payment for Load Shifting: A Japanese Time-of-Day Electricity Pricing Experiment.:, Isamu et al, Energy Journal, 21, 1, 73, Jan. 2000. |
Asian Electronics Ltd., Glossary, 2003, pp. 1-6. |
http://www.hrm.uh.edu/docs/pdf/Nextel%20Plans.pdf. |
Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms, 1984, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, p. 13. |
“Utility Control Algorithm”, Jan. 1, 1986, vol. 28, issue 8, pp. 3657-3660. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/460,885, filed Jun. 13, 2003; Total Home Energy Management; first named inventor Gale Richard Horst. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/280,902, filed Oct. 25, 2002; Method and Apparatus for Managing Resources of Utility Provider; first named inventor Gale R. Horst. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/757,891, filed Jan. 15, 2004; A Process for Managing and Curtailing Power Demand of Appliances and Components Thereof, and System Using Such Process; first named inventor Gianpiero Santacatterina. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/733,385, filed Apr. 10, 2007; Energy Management System and Method; first named inventor Gale R. Horst. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/447,359, filed May 29, 2003; Electronic System for Power Consumption Management of Appliance; first named inventor Matteo Santinato. |
European search report for corresponding EP02011668.7 dated Feb. 27, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110231788 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10447359 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 12886618 | US |