An embodiment relates generally to an electronic system, and more particularly to a system for data management.
Modern consumer and industrial electronic devices require storage of information, such as digital photographs, electronic mail, calendar, or contacts. These devices can be electronic systems, such as notebook computers, desktop computers, servers, televisions, and projectors, and are providing increasing levels of functionality to support modern life. Preserving the user data stored in the storage devices is of the utmost importance.
Different approaches have been used to monitor the general condition of the stored data. Each of these processes must include a monitoring process that can verify all of the data has been written correctly and will be available for the user whenever it is called back-up. The logistics for such a process can be burdensome and time consuming. In some cases the data can have a limited life span and must be regenerated in order to preserve it for future use.
Many of these data preservation processes can consume time, device resources, and can wear components of the device. The cost associated with the data preservation processes must be mitigated in order to balance the device availability and the protection of the data stored there. Since the preservation of the data is the primary task of the device, availability of the interface functions for retrieving or storing data can be a primary focus and sometime to the detriment of the physical device, such as head wear, media damage, or component failures.
Storage systems can include storage devices, such as hard disk drives (HDD), solid state drives (SSD), hybrid drives, and optical storage devices. In order to maintain data integrity many of the storage devices perform off-line or background data verification and maintenance processes. These processes are typically interleaved with interface operations in order to minimize the latency seen by the storage system host.
While the background scan activity is extremely beneficial, it nevertheless contributes to head wear and increased power consumption. Contemporary HDDs have shown over 60% of failed drives are due to head wear, as a result of excessive usage. As a result, a trade-off must be made in order to strike a balance between maintaining data integrity and over usage.
Some embodiments solve at least this problem by using the actual user reads in place of the background scan, thereby minimizing the needs to actually doing background scan. This mechanism can therefore reduce the need to excessively scan the disk while in idle, thus extending the longevity of the HDD by minimizing head wear/damage caused by the background scan. Further embodiments can also utilize system access, such as reserved space or boot sectors, without the need for background scan in the system spaces.
A need still remains for an electronic system as various embodiments with data management mechanism for providing reliable data while not prematurely wear-out the head. In view of the ever-increasing commercial competitive pressures, along with growing consumer expectations and the diminishing opportunities for meaningful product differentiation in the marketplace, it is increasingly critical that answers be found to these problems. Additionally, the need to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and performance, and meet competitive pressures adds an even greater urgency to the critical necessity for finding answers to these problems.
Solutions to these problems have been long sought but prior developments have not taught or suggested any solutions and, thus, solutions to these problems have long eluded those skilled in the art.
Certain embodiments have other steps or elements in addition to or in place of those mentioned above. The steps or elements will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed description when taken with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The following embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to make and use the various embodiments. It is to be understood that other embodiments would be evident based on the present disclosure, and that system, process, or mechanical changes can be made without departing from the scope of an embodiment.
In the following description, numerous specific details are given to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments. However, it will be apparent that the various embodiments can be practiced without these specific details. In order to avoid obscuring an embodiment, some well-known circuits, system configurations, and process steps are not disclosed in detail.
The drawings showing embodiments of the system are semi-diagrammatic, and not to scale and, particularly, some of the dimensions are for the clarity of presentation and are shown exaggerated in the drawing figures. Similarly, although the views in the drawings for ease of description generally show similar orientations, this depiction in the figures is arbitrary for the most part. Generally, the various embodiments can be operated in any orientation.
Referring now to
In an embodiment the electronic system 100 includes a head 102 flying over a media 104. The head 102 can be mounted to a flex arm 118 attached to an actuator arm 122. The head 102 (
The media 104 is a structure for storing information. For example, the media 104 can be made of an aluminum alloy, ceramic/glass, or a similar non-magnetic material. The top and bottom surfaces of the media 104 can be covered with magnetic material deposited on one or both sides of the media 104 to form a coating layer capable of magnetization. As an example, the media 104 can be a disk platter for one embodiment of the electronic system 100 as a rotating storage system, such as a hard disk drive (HDD). As a further example, the media 104 can be a linear magnetic strip for one embodiment of the electronic system 100 as a linear storage system, such as a tape drive.
The laser 106, as an example, can be a laser diode or other solid-state based lasers. In addition, embodiments can employ any suitable techniques for focusing the laser 106 on the media 104, such as a suitable waveguide, magnifying lens, or other suitable optics. The laser 106 is increased to a write power in order to heat the disk, thereby decreasing the coercivity of the media 104 so that the data is written more reliably.
The spindle motor 114 can rotate the media 104, about a center of the media 104, at constant or varying speed 107. For illustrative purposes, the spindle motor 114 is described as a motor for a rotation, although it is understood that the spindle motor 114 can be other actuating motors for a tape drive, as an example.
As examples, a head actuation motor 130 can be a voice coil motor assembly, a stepper motor assembly, or a combination thereof. The head actuation motor 130 can generate a torque or force for positioning the head 102.
A tapered end of the flex arm 118 can include the head 102. The flex arm 118 can be mounted to the actuator arm 122, which is pivoted around a bearing assembly 126 by the torque generated by the head actuation motor 130. The head 102 can include a single instance of the write element 110 and a single instance of the read element 112 that is narrower than the write element 110. The head 102 can fly over the media 104 at a dynamically adjustable span of the flying height 108, which represents a vertical displacement between the head 102 and the media 104. The head 102 can be positioned by the flex arm 118 and the actuator arm 122 and can have the flying height 108 adjusted by control circuitry 138.
The head 102 can be positioned over the media 104 along an arc shaped path between an inner diameter of the media 104 and outer diameter of the media 104. For illustrative purposes, the actuator arm 122 and the head actuation motor 130 are configured for rotary movement of the head 102. The actuator arm 122 and the head actuation motor 130 can be configured to have a different movement. For example, the actuator arm 122 and the head actuation motor 130 could be configured to have a linear movement resulting in the head 102 traveling along a radius of the media 104.
The head 102 can be positioned over the media 104 to create magnetic transitions or detect magnetic transitions from the coating layer that can be used to representing written data or read data, respectively. The position of the head 102 and the speed 107 of the media 104 can be controlled by the control circuitry 138. Examples of the control circuitry 138 can include a processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) an embedded processor, a microprocessor, a hardware control logic, a hardware finite state machine (FSM), a digital signal processor (DSP), digital circuitry, analog circuitry, optical circuitry, or a combination thereof. The control circuitry 138 can also include memory devices, such as a volatile memory, a nonvolatile memory, or a combination thereof. For example, the nonvolatile storage can be non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM) or Flash memory and a volatile storage can be static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM).
A system interface 140 can couple the control circuitry 138 to a host electronics (not shown). The system interface 140 can transfer user data 142 between the host electronics and the control circuitry 138. The user data 142 can be encoded or decoded by the control circuitry 138 in preparation for transfer to or from the media 104.
The control circuitry 138 can be configured to control the spindle motor 114 for adjusting the speed 107 of the media 104. The control circuitry 138 can be configured to cause the head 102 to move relative to the media 104, or vice versa. The media 104 can include a plurality of servo tracks 113 that allow the control circuitry to control the positioning of the head 102 relative to data tracks 116. The control circuitry 138 can also be configured to control the flow of information to the head 102 for writing to the data tracks 116 of the media 104. The information sent to the head 102 can include the preconditioning pattern, direct current erase signals, user data, or a combination thereof.
In one embodiment, the electronic system 100 further comprises control circuitry 138 configured to execute the flow diagrams of
Block 144 shows flying a head over a media for execution by the electronic system 100, such as a manufacturing test fixture, a hard disk drive, a tape drive, a hybrid drive, or an optical drive.
Block 146 shows executing a read command for reading data by the head. The read command can be any interface read command issued through the system interface 140 for execution by the electronic system 100.
Block 148 shows monitoring a data condition indicator of the data. This action may help determine robustness of the data accessed, including for example, whether data required any correction operations, the length of any bit corrections, how many iterations of correction was required, whether the data accessed by the read command is likely to degrade by the time it is accessed by future read commands. In one embodiment, the data that are read through the system interface 140 (e.g., a data track 116 or any portion thereof) and do not require any corrective action (e.g., read the data) are logged as scanned, so a background process does not repeat the reading of such data unnecessarily.
Block 150 shows providing the data and the data condition indicator for use by the control circuitry. The use may include, for example, determining what blocks of the used capacity must be checked for data integrity. While the background scan process can disposition the blocks that show signs of errors or require correction to be read correctly, the data that were correctly read in block 146 without correction are, in one embodiment, not readdressed by the background scan process.
It has been discovered that an embodiment of the electronic system 100 can improve manufacturing yield. The electronic system 100 can provide a holistic view of the robustness of the data written to the data tracks 116 of the media 104. Any data that shows susceptibility to data errors or requires bit corrections can be mapped through the scanned table in order to identify possible weak areas of the media 104. This holistic view can be an early predictor of problems that can occur as the electronic system 100 is used in the field.
An embodiment can be implemented in firmware to select the scanned table from the non-volatile memory on power-on for analyzing the holistic view of the user data stored in the electronic system 100.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the media 104 can be partitioned into a plurality of sector groups 202, which can also be referred to as zones, zip codes, data pages, super blocks, or bulk pages. By way of an example, five of the sector groups 202 are shown although it is understood that the entire capacity of the media 104 can be divided into the sector groups 202. Each of the sector groups 202 can comprise one or more of the data tracks 116 of
In one embodiment, each of the sector groups 202 comprises four of the data tracks 116, which can reduce the total number of the sector groups 202 managed by the control circuitry 138 of
To protect the data integrity in the sector groups 202, the control circuitry 138 can perform a refresh process on each of the sector groups 202, by reading all or substantially of the data tracks 116 within the sector groups 202 to determine whether the data tracks 116 need to be rewritten or relocated. The process of refreshing the data tracks 116 can include re-writing the contents of the data tracks 116 at the existing location or moving the data within the data tracks 116 to a new physical location. In one embodiment, the control circuitry 138 can increase refresh frequency for a particular one of the sector groups 202 when the control circuitry 138 detects an event that contributes to data degradation in the sector groups 202.
The control circuitry 138 can use the refresh process to maintain the integrity of the data stored in the sector groups 202. While the operation of the electronic system 100 proceeds, the system interface 140 can be reading the contents of the data tracks 116 within one or several of the sector groups 202. Since these sector groups 202 have been verified by the executing the read commands, any sector groups 202 that contain the data tracks 116 that are error free can be marked as having been refreshed, without performing additional checks.
It is understood that the control circuitry 138 can establish a threshold of minor error correction that can be applied to the data tracks 116, which are accessed through the system interface 140, without risk of corruption of the data within the data tracks 116. In these cases, the data tracks are considered to be error free. In the event the data tracks 116, which are accessed through the system interface 140, degrade and need additional levels of error correction, the individual data sectors within the data tracks 116 can be flagged as suspect, for later analysis by the refresh process.
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the sector groups 202 of
Various embodiments incorporate the rotational latency of the media 104 associated with positioning the head 102 at the portion 310 of the track being accessed by the data access command to access the entire track. In this embodiment, the rotational position optimization (RPO) algorithm can take into account that the pre-read 305 and/or post-read 315 are extended to cover the entire track when ordering the data access command with other commands. For the example of a read command, the control circuitry 138 can extend the pre-read 305 and/or the post-read 315 before and after the portion 310 being requested by the read command to read the entirety of the data track 301.
After reading data from the sector groups 202, the control circuitry 138 uses the read data to determine the condition of the data in the sector groups 202, and thus whether this particular one of the sector groups 202 needs to be refreshed. The control circuitry 138 can use the read data to determine the condition of the data in the sector groups 202 based on one or more of the following indicators: error correct code (ECC) symbol errors in the read data, decoding information related to low-density parity check codes, circular redundancy codes (CRC) or other error correction/detection methods, or other similar indicators related to the read process.
In an embodiment, if the control circuitry 138 determines that the condition of the data in the sector groups 202 is bad, then the control circuitry 138 can schedule the sector groups 202 for refresh. In this case, the control circuitry 138 can refresh the sector groups 202 using the data already read, e.g., due to host command(s), from the sector groups 202 to determine the condition of the sector groups 202. If the control circuitry 138 determines that the condition of the data in the sector groups 202 is good, then the control circuitry 138 can mark the status of the sector groups 202 as having been refreshed. The distinction between good and bad sector groups may be based, at least in part, on a comparison of (1) an indicator based on data collected as part of the execution of host read commands and (2) adjustable and/or pre-defined threshold(s).
In an embodiment, if the control circuitry 138 checks the condition of the sector groups 202 in response to a host read command, then the control circuitry 138 sends the portion of the read data corresponding to the data requested by the host read command to the host. The control circuitry 138 can maintain the rest of the contents of the data track 301 in a memory structure for access by subsequent data access commands.
It has been discovered that the control circuitry 138 can reduce the amount of time associated with data verification through the refresh process by extending a data access command received through the system interface 140 to include an entire data track 301 or an entire one of the sector groups 202. In instances where the sector groups 202 include multiple of the data tracks 116, they can be configured in a cylinder configuration so the sector groups 202 can be spread across multiple units of the head 102. This configuration can minimize the repositioning of the heads 102 when reading the entirety of the sector groups 202.
Referring now to
While the large majority of the read commands 402 are successfully completed without the use of error correction, some sectors can only be recovered with a correction level exceeding a threshold, which indicates that if the read were executed in the factory, the sector would have been deemed unacceptable. If those sectors can be identified while being read to fulfill a command received through the system interface 140, they can be isolated and analyzed for potential failures before data corruption can occur. Since the identification of the sector is being done while executing the read command 402 through the system interface 140, it also achieves the second screening for drive data integrity, thereby eliminating the needs to run yet another scan of the same sectors while in idle mode and minimizing wear of the head 102 of
In one embodiment, some or all of the content of the media 104 of
In one embodiment, a read command discriminator 404 can be part of a command execution 406. The read command discriminator 404 keeps track of the read commands 402 issued through the system interface 140. When the read covers the entire range of the sector group 202, a status bus 408 will update a sector group status 410 as the sector group 202 having been “Read”. In one embodiment, a background scan 412 will not execute a read scan in any of the sector groups 202 until the read flag is cleared by any of the data tracks 116 in the sector groups 202 being written.
In one embodiment, when a sector requires a level of error correction in excess of a threshold it is identified as a potential risk by a suspect logical block address (LBA) identifier 414. The suspect LBA identifier 414 is loaded into an action required memory 416 during the read command 402. The action required memory 416, such as a FIFO, can be deep enough to accommodate 1-data-track worth of sectors, though the size can vary in various embodiments.
Upon completion of the read command 402, the information in the action required memory 416 will be loaded into a volatile memory such as a DRAM. In one embodiment, the content of the volatile memory is regularly flushed to the reserve capacity of the media 104 (or some other non-volatile memory such as solid-state memory) to protect from unexpected power loss. In some embodiments, the suspect LBA identifier 414 may be loaded directly into a volatile memory such as a DRAM that is used by the control circuitry 138 without going through an action required memory.
In one embodiment, in real-time the system interface 140 can receive the read command 402 normally while the read command discriminator (RCD) 404 tracks range of LBAs and identifies whether an entire range of a specific one of the sector groups 202 had been completely covered. The RCD 404, in its simplest form in an embodiment, can be a single thread design where it can only track consecutive read commands 402 such as a sequential read. When the sequential operations of the read commands 402 covers any of the sector groups 202, the sector groups 202 can be marked as “Read.” In addition, in one embodiment, the RCD 404 can take into account any pre-/post-read activities previously shown in
In one embodiment, the RCD 404 can track multiple threads. In this case, it tracks multiple strings of the read commands 402 that can cover several of the sector groups 202 at the same time. By way of example, the RCD 404 can track history of the successive instances of the read commands 402 with a reasonable amount of depth in order to discriminate the pattern of the read commands 402 in order to identify the sector groups 202 to enter into the sector group status 410. This operation can be protected from unexpected power loss, meaning the information can be stored in the reserve capacity of the media 104 with frequent updates in order to be effective. When the electronic system 100 is idle (no command pending from the system interface 140), an check & validate module 418 can commence in the background scan 412. The check & validate module 418 read the action required memory 416 to determine which of the LBA's are suspect. In one embodiment, the check & validate module 418 re-reads the LBA's stored in the action required memory 416 through an action required bus 417 and attempts to confirm the data errors. If the check & validate module 418 is unable to confirm the data error(s) associated with an LBA, the LBA is removed from the action required memory 416. However, if the check & validate module 418 is able to confirm the data errors, the LBA/sector is subjected to a sector screen module 420, which may take one or more additional corrective actions in the various embodiments. For example, the module 420 may perform an action in which the sector is relocated temporarily and re-written to demonstrate the validity of the original sector site. If the original sector site fails the sector screen module 420, the contents of the LBA are relocated to a reliable sector location. This operation of the sector screen module 420 can continue until the action required memory 416 is empty, or when a timer or host command interrupt is triggered to stop processing.
It has been discovered that the read command discriminator 404 can minimize the amount of verification that is performed in the background scan 412. By minimizing the amount of operations performed by the background scan 412, excess wear on the head 102 can be reduced and the reliability of the electronic system 100 can be improved.
Referring now to
The analog front end 502 can produce qualified data 506, which in one embodiment does not include servo data, but does pass system data and user data to a data correction unit 508, such as a hardware error correction unit. The data correction unit 508 can include a bit correction unit 510, such as a non-linear data/soft-output Viterbi algorithm, coupled to an iteration decoder 512. The iteration decoder 512 can be monitor how many iterations are required to satisfactorily correct the bits, or how many iterations are performed before giving up on the correction of the qualified data 506.
A correction bus 514 can include the bits corrected (BC) indicator and an iteration count (IC) indicator. A low-density parity check (LDPC) unit 516 can be coupled to the data correction unit 508 for passing the corrected data. A read channel data bus 518 can pass the content of the LBA being read to the control circuitry 138 of
A threshold register 524, can establish a guideline for determining a suspect LBA 529, can comprise both channel quality metrics (IC and BC) and the read channel data bus 518, which can be transmitted concurrently. A data correction comparator 525 can compare the values from the threshold register 524 with the data condition indicator 522 for generating a captured LBA 526. The captured LBA 526 can cause an LBA counter 528 to flag the suspect LBA 529 as having errors in excess of the threshold. The LBA counter 528 can be loaded from a starting LBA indication 530 provided by the control circuitry 138. The output of the data correction comparator 525 can be one bit, an “OR function” for either IC or BC trigger, multiple bits, a pulse, or a string of pulses. In certain embodiments a more involved comparison using more than one triggers may be used. The threshold register 524 is, in one embodiment, a programmable register with update on-the-fly capability.
The suspect LBA 529, such as a number of the LBA that exceeds the error level established by the threshold register 524, can be coupled to an LBA memory 532 capable of collecting all of the sectors in the data track 116 of
By way of an example, the suspect LBA 529 can be read by the control circuitry 138 at completion of each physical read command. In one embodiment, prior to the execution of the next command (internal or external operation) the starting LBA bus 530 is loaded to the LBA counter 528 in order to track the LBA number as each sector is read from the media 104 of
For example, an aspect of some embodiments is to utilize the read commands delivered through the system interface 140 to identify possible exposures to data integrity issues on the sectors being read by the system interface 140. Furthermore, since completion of the command is of paramount importance, some embodiments normally would use the most powerful settings to recover the user data when executing the read command, as a result, subtle differences in level of correction can be detected, as the proscribed level established by the threshold register 524. This aspect can preempt the potential data losses by proactively maintaining the data tracks 116.
Various embodiments of the electronic system 100 offer the following aspects:
The command execution 406 of
Reduction of activity needed to perform the background operation 412 of
Since the often-read user data represents the LBA's that are most protected by this feature, data integrity where the user matters the most is vastly improved. While any seldom read sectors are addressed by the background operation 412.
In one embodiment, the electronic system 100 can provide a drive health indicator based on the data condition indicator of the condition of the data stored within the media 104, which can include both user data and system data. The drive health indicator can identify suspect areas in the media 104 that can be avoided in future use to assure reliability of the data as well as minimizing any damage that might occur to the head 102 by continuing to operate in the suspect areas of the media 104. For example, the drive health indicator may include historical and/or current statistics and/or counts related to suspect LBAs, bit error, correction effort level (e.g., number of iterations, how often used). The indicator may be a composite score based on these counts and/or statistics.
The electronic system 100 has been described with module functions or order as an example. The electronic system 100 can partition the modules differently or order the modules differently. For example, the sequence of actions shown in
The modules described in this application can be implemented as instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium to be executed by the control circuitry 138 in the electronic system 100. The non-transitory computer medium can include the memory of the integrated circuit in the electronic system 100. The non-transitory computer readable medium can include non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk drive, non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM), solid-state storage device (SSD), compact disk (CD), digital video disk (DVD), or universal serial bus (USB) flash memory devices. The non-transitory computer readable medium can be integrated as a part of the electronic system 100 or installed as a removable portion of the electronic system 100.
The resulting method, process, apparatus, device, product, and/or system is straightforward, cost-effective, uncomplicated, highly versatile, accurate, sensitive, and effective, and can be implemented by adapting known components for ready, efficient, and economical manufacturing, application, and utilization. Another important aspect of various embodiments is that they valuably supports and services the historical trend of reducing costs, simplifying systems, and increasing performance.
These and other valuable aspects of the various embodiments consequently further the state of the technology to at least the next level.
While the various embodiments have been described in conjunction with a specific best mode, it is to be understood that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the aforegoing description. Accordingly, the embodiments are intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the included claims. All matters set forth herein or shown in the accompanying drawings are to be interpreted in an illustrative and non-limiting sense.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/992,405 filed May 13, 2014, and the subject matter thereof is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4603357 | Ramirez et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
5418767 | Gaudet et al. | May 1995 | A |
6018789 | Sokolov et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6065095 | Sokolov et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078452 | Kittilson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081447 | Lofgren et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092149 | Hicken et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092150 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094707 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105104 | Guttmann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111717 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6145052 | Howe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175893 | D'Souza et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178056 | Cloke et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191909 | Cloke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195218 | Guttmann et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205494 | Williams | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208477 | Cloke et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223303 | Billings et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230233 | Lofgren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246346 | Cloke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249393 | Billings et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256695 | Williams | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262857 | Hull et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263459 | Schibilla | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272694 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278568 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279089 | Schibilla et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289484 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292912 | Cloke et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6310740 | Dunbar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317850 | Rothberg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327106 | Rothberg | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337778 | Gagne | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6369969 | Christiansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384999 | Schibilla | May 2002 | B1 |
6388833 | Golowka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405342 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408357 | Hanmann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408406 | Parris | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411452 | Cloke | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411458 | Billings et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412083 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415349 | Hull et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425128 | Krapf et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441981 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442328 | Elliott et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445524 | Nazarian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449767 | Krapf et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470420 | Hospodor | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480020 | Jung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480349 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480932 | Vallis et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483986 | Krapf | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487032 | Cloke et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490635 | Holmes | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493173 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499083 | Hamlin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519104 | Cloke et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525892 | Dunbar et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545830 | Briggs et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546489 | Frank, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550021 | Dalphy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552880 | Dunbar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553457 | Wilkins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6578106 | Price | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580573 | Hull et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594183 | Lofgren et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600620 | Krounbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601137 | Castro et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603622 | Christiansen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603625 | Hospodor et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6604220 | Lee | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606682 | Dang et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606714 | Thelin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606717 | Yu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611393 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615312 | Hamlin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6639748 | Christiansen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647481 | Luu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654193 | Thelin | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657810 | Kupferman | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661591 | Rothberg | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665772 | Hamlin | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687073 | Kupferman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687078 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687850 | Rothberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690523 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690882 | Hanmann et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691198 | Hamlin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691213 | Luu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691255 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6693760 | Krounbi et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694477 | Lee | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697914 | Hospodor et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704153 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708251 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710951 | Cloke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711628 | Thelin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711635 | Wang | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711660 | Milne et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715044 | Lofgren et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724982 | Hamlin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725329 | Ng et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735650 | Rothberg | May 2004 | B1 |
6735693 | Hamlin | May 2004 | B1 |
6744772 | Eneboe et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6745283 | Dang | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751402 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757481 | Nazarian et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772281 | Hamlin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781826 | Goldstone et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782449 | Codilian et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791779 | Singh et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792486 | Hanan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799274 | Hamlin | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6811427 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826003 | Subrahmanyam | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826614 | Hanmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832041 | Boyle | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832929 | Garrett et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845405 | Thelin | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845427 | Atai-Azimi | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850443 | Lofgren et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6851055 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6851063 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6853731 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6854022 | Thelin | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862660 | Wilkins et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880043 | Castro et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882486 | Kupferman | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6884085 | Goldstone | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888831 | Hospodor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6892217 | Hanmann et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6892249 | Codilian et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6892313 | Codilian et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895455 | Rothberg | May 2005 | B1 |
6895500 | Rothberg | May 2005 | B1 |
6898730 | Hanan | May 2005 | B1 |
6910099 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6928470 | Hamlin | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931439 | Hanmann et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934104 | Kupferman | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934713 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940873 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943978 | Lee | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948165 | Luu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950267 | Liu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954733 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961814 | Thelin et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965489 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965563 | Hospodor et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965966 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967799 | Lee | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968422 | Codilian et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968450 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973495 | Milne et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6973570 | Hamlin | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976190 | Goldstone | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983316 | Milne et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6986007 | Procyk et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6986154 | Price et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6995933 | Codilian et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996501 | Rothberg | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996669 | Dang et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7002926 | Eneboe et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003674 | Hamlin | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006316 | Sargenti, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009820 | Hogg | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023639 | Kupferman | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7024491 | Hanmann et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7024549 | Luu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7024614 | Thelin et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7027716 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028174 | Atai-Azimi et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031902 | Catiller | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7046465 | Kupferman | May 2006 | B1 |
7046488 | Hogg | May 2006 | B1 |
7050252 | Vallis | May 2006 | B1 |
7054937 | Milne et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7055000 | Severtson | May 2006 | B1 |
7055167 | Masters | May 2006 | B1 |
7057836 | Kupferman | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062398 | Rothberg | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7075746 | Kupferman | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076604 | Thelin | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7082494 | Thelin et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7088538 | Codilian et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7088545 | Singh et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092186 | Hogg | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7095577 | Codilian et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099095 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106537 | Bennett | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106947 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110202 | Vasquez | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111116 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7114029 | Thelin | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120737 | Thelin | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120806 | Codilian et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7126776 | Warren, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129763 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133600 | Boyle | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7136244 | Rothberg | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146094 | Boyle | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149046 | Coker et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7150036 | Milne et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155616 | Hamlin | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7170838 | Toda et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171108 | Masters et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171110 | Wilshire | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7194576 | Boyle | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200698 | Rothberg | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205805 | Bennett | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206497 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7215496 | Kupferman et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7215771 | Hamlin | May 2007 | B1 |
7237054 | Cain et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7240161 | Boyle | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249365 | Price et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7263709 | Krapf | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7274639 | Codilian et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7274659 | Hospodor | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275116 | Hanmann et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7280302 | Masiewicz | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7292774 | Masters et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7292775 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7296284 | Price et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7302501 | Cain et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7302579 | Cain et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7318088 | Mann | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7319806 | Willner et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7325244 | Boyle et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330323 | Singh et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346790 | Klein | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7366641 | Masiewicz et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7369340 | Dang et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7369343 | Yeo et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7372650 | Kupferman | May 2008 | B1 |
7380147 | Sun | May 2008 | B1 |
7392340 | Dang et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7404013 | Masiewicz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7406545 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7415571 | Hanan | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7436610 | Thelin | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7437502 | Coker | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7440214 | Ell et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7451344 | Rothberg | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7471483 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7471486 | Coker et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7486060 | Bennett | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496493 | Stevens | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7518819 | Yu et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7526184 | Parkinen et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7539924 | Vasquez et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7543117 | Hanan | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7545593 | Sun et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7551383 | Kupferman | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7562282 | Rothberg | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7577973 | Kapner, III et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7596797 | Kapner, III et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7599139 | Bombet et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7619841 | Kupferman | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7647544 | Masiewicz | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7649704 | Bombet et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653927 | Kapner, III et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7656603 | Feb 2010 | B1 | |
7656763 | Jin et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657149 | Boyle | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672072 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7673075 | Masiewicz | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7688540 | Mei et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7724461 | McFadyen et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7725584 | Hanmann et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7730295 | Lee | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7760458 | Trinh | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7768776 | Szeremeta et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7804657 | Hogg et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7813954 | Price et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7827320 | Stevens | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7839588 | Dang et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7843660 | Yeo | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7852596 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859782 | Lee | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7872822 | Rothberg | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7898756 | Wang | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7898762 | Guo et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7900037 | Fallone et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7907364 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7929234 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7933087 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7933090 | Jung et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7934030 | Sargenti, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7940491 | Szeremeta et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7944639 | Wang | May 2011 | B1 |
7945727 | Rothberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949564 | Hughes et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7974029 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7974039 | Xu et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7982993 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7984200 | Bombet et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7990648 | Wang | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7992179 | Kapner, III et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8004785 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8006027 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8014094 | Jin | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8014977 | Masiewicz et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8019914 | Vasquez et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8040625 | Boyle et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8078943 | Lee | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8079045 | Krapf et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8082433 | Fallone et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8085487 | Jung et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8089719 | Dakroub | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8090902 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8090906 | Blaha et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8091112 | Elliott et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8094396 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8094401 | Peng et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8116020 | Lee | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8116025 | Chan et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8134793 | Vasquez et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8134798 | Thelin et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8139301 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8139310 | Hogg | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8144419 | Liu | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8145452 | Masiewicz et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8149528 | Suratman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8154812 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8159768 | Miyamura | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8161328 | Wilshire | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8164849 | Szeremeta et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8174780 | Tsai et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8190575 | Ong et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8194338 | Zhang | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8194340 | Boyle et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8194341 | Boyle | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8201066 | Wang | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8271692 | Dinh et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8279550 | Hogg | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8281218 | Ybarra et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8285923 | Stevens | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289656 | Huber | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8305705 | Roohr | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8307156 | Codilian et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8310775 | Boguslawski et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315006 | Chahwan et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8316263 | Gough et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8320067 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8324974 | Bennett | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8332695 | Dalphy et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341337 | Ong et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8350628 | Bennett | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8356184 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8370683 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8375225 | Ybarra | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8375274 | Bonke | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8380922 | DeForest et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8390948 | Hogg | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8390952 | Szeremeta | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8392689 | Lott | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8407393 | Yolar et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8413010 | Vasquez et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8417566 | Price et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421663 | Bennett | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8422172 | Dakroub et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8427771 | Tsai | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429343 | Tsai | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433937 | Wheelock et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433977 | Vasquez et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8458526 | Dalphy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8462466 | Huber | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467151 | Huber | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489841 | Strecke et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8493679 | Boguslawski et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8498074 | Mobley et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8499198 | Messenger et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8512049 | Huber et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8514506 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8531791 | Reid et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8554741 | Malina | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8560759 | Boyle et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8565053 | Chung | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8576511 | Coker et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8578100 | Huynh et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8578242 | Burton et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8589773 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8593753 | Anderson | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8595432 | Vinson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8599510 | Fallone | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8601248 | Thorsted | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611032 | Champion et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612650 | Carrie et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8612706 | Madril et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8612798 | Tsai | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8619383 | Jung et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8621115 | Bombet et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8621133 | Boyle | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8626463 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630052 | Jung et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8630056 | Ong | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8631188 | Heath et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8634158 | Chahwan et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8635412 | Wilshire | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8640007 | Schulze | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8654619 | Cheng | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8661193 | Cobos et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8667248 | Neppalli | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8670205 | Malina et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683295 | Syu et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683457 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8687306 | Coker et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8693133 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8694841 | Chung et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8699159 | Malina | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8699171 | Boyle | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8699172 | Gunderson et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8699175 | Olds et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8699185 | Teh et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8700850 | Lalouette | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8743502 | Bonke et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8749910 | Dang et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8751699 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8755141 | Dang | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8755143 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756361 | Pruett et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756382 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8769593 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8773802 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8780478 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782334 | Boyle et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8793532 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8797669 | Burton et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8799977 | Kapner, III et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819375 | Pruett et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825976 | Jones | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8825977 | Syu et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
20060013095 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070263506 | Gulas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080259487 | Aida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090113702 | Hogg | May 2009 | A1 |
20100306551 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110226729 | Hogg | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120159042 | Lott et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120275050 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120281963 | Krapf et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324980 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140201424 | Chen et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61992405 | May 2014 | US |