Electronic system with media recovery mechanism and method of operation thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9064504
  • Patent Number
    9,064,504
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 24, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 23, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus includes: a media; a head over the media; and control circuitry, coupled to the heads, configured to: select an operational head from the heads based on margin data collected under a lube waterfall condition, and perform an access to the media with the operational head.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

An embodiment relates generally to an electronic system, and more particularly to a system for media test and use.


BACKGROUND

Modern consumer and industrial electronic devices require storage of information, such as digital photographs, electronic mail, calendar, or contacts. These devices can be electronic systems, such as notebook computers, desktop computers, servers, televisions, and projectors, and are providing increasing levels of functionality to support modern life. Increased capacity and cost reductions are an ongoing market demand for storage in these systems.


Research and development in the existing technologies can take a myriad of different directions. One way to increase performance and reduce cost at the same time is to provide reliable products without excessively screening out potentially good products.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A, 1B, and 1C show an operational diagram of an electronic system according to an embodiment.



FIG. 2 provides a geometrical representation of a media of the electronic system according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 is an example of a plurality of the head and a plurality of the media of the electronic system according to one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method of operation of an electronic system in an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A need still remains for an electronic system with media recovery mechanism for improving yield and performance when writing. The improved yield and performance can be provided recognition and coping with transient conditions and treating it as a transient condition as oppose to a permanent condition. In view of the ever-increasing commercial competitive pressures, along with growing consumer expectations and the diminishing opportunities for meaningful product differentiation in the marketplace, it is increasingly critical that answers be found to these problems. Additionally, the need to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and performance, and meet competitive pressures adds an even greater urgency to the critical necessity for finding answers to these problems.


Solutions to these problems have been long sought but prior developments have not taught or suggested any solutions and, thus, solutions to these problems have long eluded those skilled in the art.


Certain embodiments have other steps or elements in addition to or in place of those mentioned above. The steps or elements will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed description when taken with reference to the accompanying drawings.


The following embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments. It is to be understood that other embodiments would be evident based on the present disclosure, and that system, process, or mechanical changes may be made without departing from the scope of an embodiment.


In the following description, numerous specific details are given to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be apparent that the embodiments can be practiced without these specific details. In order to avoid obscuring an embodiment, some well-known circuits, system configurations, and process steps are not disclosed in detail.


The drawings showing embodiments of the system are semi-diagrammatic, and not to scale and, particularly, some of the dimensions are for the clarity of presentation and are shown exaggerated in the drawing figures. Similarly, although the views in the drawings for ease of description generally show similar orientations, this depiction in the figures is arbitrary for the most part. Generally, an embodiment can be operated in any orientation. The embodiments have been numbered first embodiment, second embodiment, etc. as a matter of descriptive convenience and are not intended to have any other significance or provide limitations for an embodiment. For reference purposes the data surface of the media is defined as being “horizontal” though it is understood that the electronic system can operate at any angle. Position of the head over the media is referred to as a “vertical” displacement or flying height.


Referring now to FIGS. 1A, 1B, and 1C, therein are shown an operational diagram of an electronic system 100 according to an embodiment. The electronic system 100 can represent an apparatus for one of the embodiments. An embodiment depicted in FIGS. 1A, 1B, and 1C is shown as a hard disk drive, as an example, although it is understood that the electronic system 100 as the embodiment can be a tape drive, a solid-state hybrid disk drive, or other magnetic media-based storage device. Further for example, the electronic system 100 can represent a desktop computer, a notebook computer, a server, a tablet, a television, a household appliance, or other electronic systems utilizing magnetic media storage.


The electronic system 100 including a head 102 actuated over a media 104. The head 102 can be mounted to a flex arm 118 attached to an actuator arm 122. The head 102 (FIG. 1B) can optionally include a laser 106 for heating the media 104 during part of a write process (e.g., the head is part of an Energy-Assisted Magnetic Recording (EAMR) drive). The flying height 108 can be adjusted (e.g., by use of a heater element in the head not shown in FIG. 1B) while writing data to the media 104 or as an error recovery process during reading from the media 104. Also in an embodiment of FIG. 1B, the head 102 comprises a write element 110 (e.g., an inductive coil) and a read element 112 (e.g., a magnetoresistive read element).


The media 104 is a structure for storing information. For example, the media 104 can be made of an aluminum alloy, ceramic/glass, or a similar non-magnetic material. The top and bottom surfaces of the media 104 can be covered with magnetic material deposited on one or both sides of the media 104 to form a coating layer capable of magnetization. As an example, the media 104 can be a disk platter for one embodiment of the electronic system 100 as a rotating storage system, such as a hard disk drive (HDD). As a further example, the media 104 can be a linear magnetic strip for one embodiment of the electronic system 100 as a linear storage system, such as a tape drive.


The laser 106, as an example, can be a laser diode or other solid-state based lasers. In addition, embodiments can employ any suitable techniques for focusing the laser 106 on the media 104, such as a suitable waveguide, magnifying lens, or other suitable optics. The laser 106 is increased to a write power in order to heat the disk, thereby decreasing the coercivity of the media 104 so that the data is written more reliably.


The spindle motor 114 can rotate the media 104, about a center of the media 104, at constant or varying speed 107. For illustrative purposes, the spindle motor 114 is described as a motor for a rotation, although it is understood that the spindle motor 114 can be other actuating motors for a tape drive, as an example.


As examples, a motor assembly 130 can be a voice coil motor assembly, a stepper motor assembly, or a combination thereof. The motor assembly 130 can generate a torque or force for positioning the head 102.


A tapered end of the flex arm 118 can include the head 102. The flex arm 118 can be mounted to the actuator arm 122, which is pivoted around a bearing assembly 126 by the torque generated by the motor assembly 130. The head 102 can include a single instance of the write element 110 and a single instance of the read element 112 that is narrower than the write element 110. The head 102 can fly over the media 104 at a dynamically adjustable span of the flying height 108, which represents a vertical displacement between the head 102 and the media 104. The head 102 can be positioned by the flex arm 118 and the actuator arm 122 and can have the flying height 108 adjusted by control circuitry 138.


The head 102 can be positioned over the media 104 along an arc shaped path between an inner diameter of the media 104 and outer diameter of the media 104. For illustrative purposes, the actuator arm 122 and the motor assembly 130 are configured for rotary movement of the head 102. The actuator arm 122 and the motor assembly 130 can be configured to have a different movement. For example, the actuator arm 122 and the motor assembly 130 could be configured to have a linear movement resulting in the head 102 traveling along a radius of the media 104.


The head 102 can be positioned over the media 104 to create magnetic transitions or detect magnetic transitions from the coating layer that can be used to representing written data or read data, respectively. The position of the head 102 and the speed 107 of the media 104 can be controlled by the control circuitry 138. Examples of the control circuitry 138 can include a processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) an embedded processor, a microprocessor, a hardware control logic, a hardware finite state machine (FSM), a digital signal processor (DSP), digital circuitry, analog circuitry, optical circuitry, or a combination thereof. The control circuitry 138 can also include memory devices, such as a volatile memory, a nonvolatile memory, or a combination thereof. For example, the nonvolatile storage can be non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM) or Flash memory and a volatile storage can be static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM).


A system interface 140 can couple the control circuitry 138 to a host electronics (not shown). The system interface 140 can transfer user data 142 between the host electronics and the control circuitry 138. The user data 142 can be encoded or decoded by the control circuitry 138 in preparation for transfer to or from the media 104.


The control circuitry 138 can be configured to control the spindle motor 114 for adjusting the speed 107 of the media 104. The control circuitry 138 can be configured to cause the head 102 to move relative to the media 104, or vice versa. The control circuitry 138 can also be configured to control the flow of information to the head 102 for writing to the media 104. The information sent to the head 102 can include the preconditioning pattern, direct current erase signals, user data, or a combination thereof.


Lube waterfall (LWF) is a transient phenomenon that affects recording performance when a head 102 is loaded after extended flying followed by a long duration of parking on a loading ramp 132. During extended actuation of the head 102, lube is picked up from the surface of the media 104, and moved to a deposit end 111 of the head 102. When the head 102 rests on the loading ramp 132, lube flows back to and coats the air bearing surface (ABS) 113, due to free energy decrease and diffusion effect. When the head 102 is relocated from the loading ramp 132 to the media 104, the head 102 can fly too high above the media 104 due to the extra coating of lube that has migrated onto the ABS 113. Writing data with excessive fly height or magnetic spacing can cause write errors due to the poor magnetic coupling between the head 102 and the media 104. Typically after 1-2 minutes of operation the head 102 will return to the normal fly height because the lube moves back to the deposit end 111 due to air flow.


The detrimental effect of LWF is proportional to the sensitivity of recording performance of the head 102 and media 104 pair due to magnetic spacing variation. The sensitivity of recording performance of the head 102 and media 104 pair increasing with increasing Bits per Inch (BPI) density. In other words, the impact of this issue will constantly increase as drive capacity increases.


The failure probability due to LWF has been observed to be drastically different between “serpentine” and “ordered zone” drive architecture. The serpentine architecture can perform writes on each of the heads in a disk drive before switching to the next sequential track to continue writing. By forcing the drive to write using all the heads 102 within the first few minutes of write upon power-on, the serpentine architecture has more chance to produce a write error since, if any head 102 in an electronic system 100 is susceptible to LWF-induced failure, the failure probability is 100%.


In contrast, the ordered zone architecture can spend the entire duration of the transient LWF condition writing on a single head 102. The ordered zone architecture has a failure probability between 1/n (n=number of head in drive) and 100%.


The transient LWF susceptibility can be measured during the manufacturing process by a LWF stress test. For example the LWF stress test consists of (i) measuring write capability parametric, e.g., Over Write (OW), Error Margin (EM), Resolution (RES), (ii) parking head 102, on the loading ramp 132, for 5 hours or more (pre-conditioning time) with power off, (iii) power on, load the head 102 from the loading ramp 132 to the media 104 and immediately issue a time-limited (e.g., 2 minutes) write command, (iv) measure OW & EM after write command completion, (v) read back the written data with error retries disabled for determining the margin data, including the over write and the error margin. The heads 102 demonstrating high LWF susceptibility will be detected by errors written to the media. Margin data of the head 102 against LWF susceptibility will be ranked by OW & EM delta between pre-conditioning measurements and post-test results.


As determined by LWF testing, the flying height increase due to LWF significantly varies between the heads 102, within an electronic system 100, and there are statistically 10%, as an example, of the heads 102 that demonstrate high sensitivity to lubricant waterfall (LWF) testing. On the other hand, there is a very high probability that any of the electronic system 100 has at least one of the heads 102 with very low or no sensitivity to LWF.


In one embodiment, the electronic system 100 further comprises control circuitry 138 configured to execute the flow diagrams of FIG. 1C. As an example, blocks 144 to 148 can represent the flow diagram where an embodiment is employing conventional magnetic recording (CMR). As a further example, blocks 150 to 156 can represent the flow diagram where an embodiment is employing shingled magnetic recording (SMR).


For an embodiment with CMR, in the block 144, this step can apply to an embodiment undergoing LWF stress test, for example, during the Back End process for the electronic system 100, such as a manufacturing test fixture, a hard disk drive, a tape drive, or a hybrid drive. This step can also measure the susceptibility of the head 102 or multiple instances of the head 102 to LWF. For example, Pass/Fail can be determined by evaluating margin data, such as OW/EM/RES performance, of each head 102 with optimized pass/fail limits. If no head 102 can pass this test, the electronic system 100 fails the BE process. In one embodiment, the failure rate and yield loss is very low since a drive passes if at least one head 102 in it passes the limits.


In the block 146, this step selects the operational heads 102. The operational heads 102 are operational or acceptable within pass limits under the LWF stress test. In an embodiment, this step can also select the most robust head 102 out of those that are operational. A most robust head 102 is one that is less susceptible to LWF. A record in the boot block can be updated to reflect which of the heads 102 demonstrates the least susceptibility to the LWF criteria. The boot block can list all of the heads, which demonstrate acceptable performance based on the LWF test criteria, in priority order.


In the block 148, this step can write to a media based cache (MBC), using one of the operational heads 102 or as a more specific example the most robust head 102 against LWF. The selection of one of the operational heads 102, which is not necessarily the most robust head 102 under LWF stress test, can provide performance improvements for the write operation if, for example, that head 102 is already on the side of the media 104 where the media based cache is to be written.


As an example, this step can take place after a power on. The media based cache can be a portion of the media 104 reserved for use as a cache. Other examples for the cache can include non-volatile memory as part of the electronic system 100, volatile memory as part of the electronic system 100, user area on the media 104, on a side or a portion of a side of the media 104, or a combination thereof.


For an embodiment with SMR, in the block 150, this step can apply to an embodiment undergoing LWF stress test, for example, during the Back End process for the electronic system 100, such as a manufacturing test fixture, a hard disk drive or tape drive or a hybrid drive. This step can also measure the susceptibility of the head 102 or multiple instances of the head 102 to LWF. For example, Pass/Fail can be determined by evaluating the margin data, such as OW/EM/RES performance, of each head 102 with optimized pass/fail limits. If no head 102 can pass this test, the electronic system 100 fails the BE process. In one embodiment, the failure rate and yield loss is very low since a drive passes if at least one of the heads 102 in it passes the limits.


In the block 152, this step selects the operational heads 102. These heads 102 are operational within pass limits under the LWF stress test. In an embodiment, this step can also select the most robust head 102 out of those that are operational. A most robust head 102 is one that is the least susceptible to LWF. This step can determine the most robust (least susceptible) head 102 and save this determination for later use. The saved determination can list all of the heads, which demonstrate acceptable performance based on the LWF test criteria, in priority order.


In the block 154, this step can, for example, takes place after a power up and/or during the reading of the current active zones/heads for host writes, garbage collection and/or defragmentation. The step can interrogate an active zones table to determine if the current selected head 102 is operational or the most robust for LWF. If not, this step can close the active zone and select a new zone from the pool of free zones with the operational head 102 or the most robust head 102 for LWF operations. The active zones table can be read from the media 104 as part of the power-on initialization process and subsequent accesses can be from memory managed by the control circuitry 138.


In the block 156, this step can continue to confine the active zone selection process to the operational head 102, or the most robust head 102 having available zones, for a predetermined period of time. During the predetermined period of time all write commands received from the system interface 120 can be constrained to the active zone and the operational head, without regard to the destination logical block address of the write command. The active zone provides a media based cache accessed by the operational head for all write commands during the predetermined period of time.


It has been discovered that an embodiment of the electronic system 100 can improve manufacturing yield. By way of an example, testing a prior art disk drive, having 10 of the heads 102, for the LWF condition by the prior art method (all heads must pass LWF test) can typically identify 5% of the prior art disk drives that fail to meet requirements. An embodiment of the electronic system 100 can reduce the LWF failure rate to 0% because the probability that any single unit of the head 102 will pass the LWF test is 99.5%. Similarly the prior art disk drive having two heads tested by the prior art LWF method can identify 1% of the manufacturing volume that fails the LWF test. An embodiment of the electronic system 100 can reduce the LWF failure rate to 0% for a two head version because the probability that any single unit of the head 102 will pass the LWF test is 99.5%.


Additional details related to the flow diagrams will be provided below in conjunction with FIGS. 2-3.


It has been discovered that an embodiment improves yield from the manufacturing line while providing good drives that can operate through the transient effects from LWF. While failure probability due to LWF on serpentine architecture is 100% of the head-basis probability (10-20%), and the ordered zone architecture has a failure probability between (1/n)x and 1x (10-20%), the method herein described has a failure probability of near 0% in the field since drive will be screened in the Back End process. While a direct drive process screen can achieve the same result, it will generate high yield loss since the performance of a drive is judged by the performance of the weakest head within the drive, while an embodiment will judge drives by the strongest head performance and yield loss will be negligible.


An embodiment can be implemented in firmware to select the head 102, recorded in the boot block, that will write to the media based cache, for the first few minutes after power on, in spite any host commands to write to specific logical block address (LBA). This will eliminate lube waterfall (LWF) induced failures in the electronic system 100.


Referring now to FIG. 2, therein is shown a geometrical representation of a media 104 of the electronic system 100 of FIGS. 1A-C according to an embodiment. In an embodiment shown in FIG. 2, shingle data tracks 202 in the shingle zone 204 can be written in an overlapping manner. Overlapping the shingle data tracks 202 increases the radial density of the media 104, thereby increasing the capacity of the electronic system 100, as an example. The shingle data tracks 202 can be written as a circular pattern as illustrated in FIG. 2, where the shingle data tracks 202 are written from the outer diameter toward the inner diameter (or vice versa). Non-overlapping tracks are written in a non-shingle zone 212 in an embodiment, such as with conventional magnetic recording (CMR). While in this example the shingle zone 204 is depicted on the outer diameter relative to the non-shingle zone 212, the arrangement of the zones and the number of zones used may be different depending on implementation.


In one embodiment, frequently written logical block addresses (LBAs) can be written to the non-shingled data tracks 210 of a non-shingle zone 212 and infrequently written LBAs are written to the shingle data tracks 202 of the shingle zone 204. This increases the overall capacity of the electronic system 100 since the radial density or linear density of the shingle data tracks 202 can be significantly higher than the radial density of the non-shingled data tracks 210. The performance of the electronic system 100 is not significantly impacted by the clean-up process known as “garbage collection,” which is performed on the shingle zone 204, since update writes occur at a lower frequency. The clean-up process can include an initialization of a number of the shingle data tracks 202 that require update and is performed by writing the preconditioning pattern across any residual information on the number of the shingle data tracks 202. Once the shingle data tracks 202 have been initialized, they are once again available for use.


In another embodiment, the lower radial density of the non-shingled data tracks 210 in the non-shingle zone 212 can increase performance by avoiding (or reducing) the need to perform write verify operations, whereas the higher radial density of the shingled shingle data tracks 202 in the non-shingle zone 212 can reduce performance due to a need to perform write verify operations. Storing data associated with infrequently written LBAs in the shingled shingle data tracks 202 of the shingle zone 204 reduces the frequency of corresponding write verify operations while increasing the overall capacity of the electronic system 100. Although FIG. 2 depicts a media with both a shingle and a non-shingle zone, in some embodiments the media 104 can include all shingled tracks or all non-shingled tracks.


For illustrative purposes, the media 104 is described with the data stored with the shingled structure or format with the shingle data tracks 202 and the shingle zone 204, although it is understood that the media 104 can be store user data and drive format data differently. For example, the media 104 can store user data or drive format data with non-overlapping format with data tracks and without the shingle zone 204.


Referring now to FIG. 3, therein is shown an example of a plurality of the heads 102 and a plurality of the media 104 of the electronic system 100 according to one embodiment. FIG. 3 depicts each of the media 104 as a disk platter and a pair of instances of the head 102 above and below the media 104.


As an embodiment, the MBC can be distributed among the recording sides for each of the media 104. The media 104 or the side of the media 104 designated for MBC, information (user data or drive formatting data) can have different formats than media 104 that are not designated as MBC. For example, information written to MBC can be written with different track pitch, bit spacing/frequency, double writing (repeat same data or different coding scheme).


Designation of a portion of the media 104, a side of the media 104, or which of the head 102 for MBC can be done at manufacturing time. The designation for MBC can also be done in the field. The adjustment can be made as the head 102 and the media 104 combination has degraded in the field.


Among the plurality of the head 102, one or some can be determined to be the most robust or less susceptible to LWF failures. The most robust head 102 can be designated as the operational head 102 and can be used to write to the active zone on its surface of the media 104 as the MBC for the predetermined time of the transient LWF condition.


In an attempt to shorten the duration of the transient LWF condition, the control circuitry 138 of FIG. 1A can activate the laser 106 of FIG. 1B for all of the heads from initial power on. The heat generated by the laser 106 can reduce the viscosity of the lube on the ABS 113 of FIG. 1B. The reduced viscosity can aid in the shortening of the time required for removal of the lube from the ABS 113. The control circuitry 138 can choose to deactivate the laser 106 when the head 102 is loaded from the loading ramp 132 of FIG. 1A to the media 104.


Referring now to FIG. 4, therein is shown a flow chart of methods 400 of operation of an electronic system 100 in an embodiment utilizing CMR and SMR. The method 400 with CMR includes: applying LWF stress test during a Back End (BE) process, and measuring head susceptibility to LWF in a block 402; examining margin data for selecting a head determined to be operational under LWF stress test in a block 404; writing with the operational head in a block 406 (e.g., writing to an MBC).


The method 400 with SMR includes: applying LWF stress test during the Back End (BE) process, and measuring head susceptibility to LWF in a block 408; determining a head as operational under LWF and saving this determination in a block 410; during reading of current active zones/heads for host writes, garbage collection and/or defragmentation, determining if the current selected head is the operational head under LWF in a block 412; and continuing to confine the active zone selection process to the operational LWF head zones for predetermined time period, by closing the active zone accessed by the currently selected head, selecting a different active zone with one of the heads different from the currently selected head, or confining the selected different active zone to the operational head in a block 414.


The resulting method, process, apparatus, device, product, and/or system is straightforward, cost-effective, uncomplicated, highly versatile, accurate, sensitive, and effective, and can be implemented by adapting known components for ready, efficient, and economical manufacturing, application, and utilization. Another important aspect of an embodiment is that it valuably supports and services the historical trend of reducing costs, simplifying systems, and increasing performance.


These and other valuable aspects of an embodiment consequently further the state of the technology to at least the next level.


While the embodiment has been described in conjunction with a specific best mode, it is to be understood that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the included claims. All matters set forth herein or shown in the accompanying drawings are to be interpreted in an illustrative and non-limiting sense.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a media;heads over the media; andcontrol circuitry, coupled to the heads, configured to: select an operational head from the heads based on margin data collected under a lube waterfall condition, andperform an access to the media with the operational head.
  • 2. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the operational head comprises at least one of the heads less susceptible to the lube waterfall condition.
  • 3. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the access comprises the access under the lube waterfall condition.
  • 4. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the access comprises a write.
  • 5. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to perform the access with the operational head for a pre-determined amount of time after a power on.
  • 6. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to determine an active zone on the media with a currently selected head.
  • 7. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to close the active zone accessed by the currently selected head.
  • 8. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to select a different active zone with one of the heads different from the currently selected head.
  • 9. The apparatus as claimed in claim 8 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to confine the selected different active zone to the operational head.
  • 10. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to perform a write of the media with a currently selected head.
  • 11. A method operating an apparatus including heads over a media, the method comprising: determining an operational head from the heads based on margin data collected under a lube waterfall condition; andperforming an access to the media with the operational head.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the operational head comprises at least one of the heads less susceptible to the lube waterfall condition.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein performing the access comprises performing the access under the lube waterfall condition.
  • 14. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the access comprises a write.
  • 15. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein performing the access comprises performing the access with the operational head for a pre-determined amount of time after a power on.
  • 16. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein determining the operational head comprises determining an active zone on the media with a currently selected head.
  • 17. The method as claimed in claim 16 wherein determining the operational head comprises closing the active zone accessed by the currently selected head.
  • 18. The method as claimed in claim 16 wherein determining the operational head comprises selecting a different active zone with one of the heads different from the currently selected head.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 18 further comprising confining the active zone on the media with the operational head.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein determining the operational head comprises performing a write of the media with the heads under the lube waterfall condition and reading from a currently selected head after the lube waterfall condition.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/933,139 filed Jan. 29, 2014, and the subject matter thereof is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

US Referenced Citations (442)
Number Name Date Kind
4490766 Hill et al. Dec 1984 A
5850321 McNeil et al. Dec 1998 A
6018789 Sokolov et al. Jan 2000 A
6065095 Sokolov et al. May 2000 A
6078452 Kittilson et al. Jun 2000 A
6081447 Lofgren et al. Jun 2000 A
6092149 Hicken et al. Jul 2000 A
6092150 Sokolov et al. Jul 2000 A
6094707 Sokolov et al. Jul 2000 A
6105104 Guttmann et al. Aug 2000 A
6111717 Cloke et al. Aug 2000 A
6145052 Howe et al. Nov 2000 A
6175893 D'Souza et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178056 Cloke et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191909 Cloke et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195218 Guttmann et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205494 Williams Mar 2001 B1
6208477 Cloke et al. Mar 2001 B1
6223303 Billings et al. Apr 2001 B1
6230233 Lofgren et al. May 2001 B1
6246346 Cloke et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249393 Billings et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256695 Williams Jul 2001 B1
6262857 Hull et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263459 Schibilla Jul 2001 B1
6272694 Weaver et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278568 Cloke et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279089 Schibilla et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289484 Rothberg et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292912 Cloke et al. Sep 2001 B1
6310740 Dunbar et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317850 Rothberg Nov 2001 B1
6327106 Rothberg Dec 2001 B1
6337778 Gagne Jan 2002 B1
6356405 Gui et al. Mar 2002 B1
6369969 Christiansen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373658 Gui et al. Apr 2002 B2
6384999 Schibilla May 2002 B1
6388833 Golowka et al. May 2002 B1
6405342 Lee Jun 2002 B1
6408357 Hanmann et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408406 Parris Jun 2002 B1
6411452 Cloke Jun 2002 B1
6411458 Billings et al. Jun 2002 B1
6412083 Rothberg et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415349 Hull et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425128 Krapf et al. Jul 2002 B1
6441981 Cloke et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442328 Elliott et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445524 Nazarian et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449767 Krapf et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453115 Boyle Sep 2002 B1
6470420 Hospodor Oct 2002 B1
6480020 Jung et al. Nov 2002 B1
6480349 Kim et al. Nov 2002 B1
6480932 Vallis et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483986 Krapf Nov 2002 B1
6487032 Cloke et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490635 Holmes Dec 2002 B1
6493168 French et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493173 Kim et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493184 Smith Dec 2002 B1
6499083 Hamlin Dec 2002 B1
6519104 Cloke et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525892 Dunbar et al. Feb 2003 B1
6545830 Briggs et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546489 Frank, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6550021 Dalphy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552880 Dunbar et al. Apr 2003 B1
6553457 Wilkins et al. Apr 2003 B1
6578106 Price Jun 2003 B1
6580573 Hull et al. Jun 2003 B1
6594183 Lofgren et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600620 Krounbi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601137 Castro et al. Jul 2003 B1
6603622 Christiansen et al. Aug 2003 B1
6603625 Hospodor et al. Aug 2003 B1
6604220 Lee Aug 2003 B1
6606682 Dang et al. Aug 2003 B1
6606714 Thelin Aug 2003 B1
6606717 Yu et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611393 Nguyen et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615312 Hamlin et al. Sep 2003 B1
6639748 Christiansen et al. Oct 2003 B1
6647481 Luu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654193 Thelin Nov 2003 B1
6657810 Kupferman Dec 2003 B1
6661591 Rothberg Dec 2003 B1
6665772 Hamlin Dec 2003 B1
6687073 Kupferman Feb 2004 B1
6687078 Kim Feb 2004 B1
6687850 Rothberg Feb 2004 B1
6690523 Nguyen et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690882 Hanmann et al. Feb 2004 B1
6691198 Hamlin Feb 2004 B1
6691213 Luu et al. Feb 2004 B1
6691255 Rothberg et al. Feb 2004 B1
6693760 Krounbi et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694477 Lee Feb 2004 B1
6697914 Hospodor et al. Feb 2004 B1
6704153 Rothberg et al. Mar 2004 B1
6708251 Boyle et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710951 Cloke Mar 2004 B1
6711628 Thelin Mar 2004 B1
6711635 Wang Mar 2004 B1
6711660 Milne et al. Mar 2004 B1
6715044 Lofgren et al. Mar 2004 B2
6724982 Hamlin Apr 2004 B1
6725329 Ng et al. Apr 2004 B1
6735650 Rothberg May 2004 B1
6735693 Hamlin May 2004 B1
6744772 Eneboe et al. Jun 2004 B1
6745283 Dang Jun 2004 B1
6751402 Elliott et al. Jun 2004 B1
6757481 Nazarian et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760175 Smith Jul 2004 B2
6772281 Hamlin Aug 2004 B2
6781826 Goldstone et al. Aug 2004 B1
6782449 Codilian et al. Aug 2004 B1
6791779 Singh et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792486 Hanan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6799274 Hamlin Sep 2004 B1
6811427 Garrett et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826003 Subrahmanyam Nov 2004 B1
6826614 Hanmann et al. Nov 2004 B1
6832041 Boyle Dec 2004 B1
6832929 Garrett et al. Dec 2004 B2
6845405 Thelin Jan 2005 B1
6845427 Atai-Azimi Jan 2005 B1
6850443 Lofgren et al. Feb 2005 B2
6851055 Boyle et al. Feb 2005 B1
6851063 Boyle et al. Feb 2005 B1
6853731 Boyle et al. Feb 2005 B1
6854022 Thelin Feb 2005 B1
6862660 Wilkins et al. Mar 2005 B1
6880043 Castro et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882486 Kupferman Apr 2005 B1
6884085 Goldstone Apr 2005 B1
6888831 Hospodor et al. May 2005 B1
6892217 Hanmann et al. May 2005 B1
6892249 Codilian et al. May 2005 B1
6892313 Codilian et al. May 2005 B1
6895455 Rothberg May 2005 B1
6895500 Rothberg May 2005 B1
6898730 Hanan May 2005 B1
6910099 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6928470 Hamlin Aug 2005 B1
6931439 Hanmann et al. Aug 2005 B1
6934104 Kupferman Aug 2005 B1
6934713 Schwartz et al. Aug 2005 B2
6940873 Boyle et al. Sep 2005 B2
6943978 Lee Sep 2005 B1
6948165 Luu et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950267 Liu et al. Sep 2005 B1
6954733 Ellis et al. Oct 2005 B1
6961814 Thelin et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965489 Lee et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965563 Hospodor et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965966 Rothberg et al. Nov 2005 B1
6967799 Lee Nov 2005 B1
6968422 Codilian et al. Nov 2005 B1
6968450 Rothberg et al. Nov 2005 B1
6973495 Milne et al. Dec 2005 B1
6973570 Hamlin Dec 2005 B1
6976190 Goldstone Dec 2005 B1
6983316 Milne et al. Jan 2006 B1
6986007 Procyk et al. Jan 2006 B1
6986154 Price et al. Jan 2006 B1
6995933 Codilian et al. Feb 2006 B1
6996501 Rothberg Feb 2006 B1
6996669 Dang et al. Feb 2006 B1
7002926 Eneboe et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003674 Hamlin Feb 2006 B1
7006316 Sargenti, Jr. et al. Feb 2006 B1
7009820 Hogg Mar 2006 B1
7023639 Kupferman Apr 2006 B1
7024491 Hanmann et al. Apr 2006 B1
7024549 Luu et al. Apr 2006 B1
7024614 Thelin et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027716 Boyle et al. Apr 2006 B1
7028174 Atai-Azimi et al. Apr 2006 B1
7031902 Catiller Apr 2006 B1
7046465 Kupferman May 2006 B1
7046488 Hogg May 2006 B1
7050252 Vallis May 2006 B1
7054937 Milne et al. May 2006 B1
7055000 Severtson May 2006 B1
7055167 Masters May 2006 B1
7057836 Kupferman Jun 2006 B1
7062398 Rothberg Jun 2006 B1
7075746 Kupferman Jul 2006 B1
7076604 Thelin Jul 2006 B1
7082494 Thelin et al. Jul 2006 B1
7088538 Codilian et al. Aug 2006 B1
7088545 Singh et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092186 Hogg Aug 2006 B1
7095577 Codilian et al. Aug 2006 B1
7099095 Subrahmanyam et al. Aug 2006 B1
7106537 Bennett Sep 2006 B1
7106947 Boyle et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110202 Vasquez Sep 2006 B1
7111116 Boyle et al. Sep 2006 B1
7114029 Thelin Sep 2006 B1
7120737 Thelin Oct 2006 B1
7120806 Codilian et al. Oct 2006 B1
7126776 Warren, Jr. et al. Oct 2006 B1
7129763 Bennett et al. Oct 2006 B1
7133600 Boyle Nov 2006 B1
7136244 Rothberg Nov 2006 B1
7146094 Boyle Dec 2006 B1
7149046 Coker et al. Dec 2006 B1
7150036 Milne et al. Dec 2006 B1
7155616 Hamlin Dec 2006 B1
7171108 Masters et al. Jan 2007 B1
7171110 Wilshire Jan 2007 B1
7194576 Boyle Mar 2007 B1
7200698 Rothberg Apr 2007 B1
7205805 Bennett Apr 2007 B1
7206497 Boyle et al. Apr 2007 B1
7215496 Kupferman et al. May 2007 B1
7215771 Hamlin May 2007 B1
7237054 Cain et al. Jun 2007 B1
7240161 Boyle Jul 2007 B1
7249365 Price et al. Jul 2007 B1
7263709 Krapf Aug 2007 B1
7274639 Codilian et al. Sep 2007 B1
7274659 Hospodor Sep 2007 B2
7275116 Hanmann et al. Sep 2007 B1
7280302 Masiewicz Oct 2007 B1
7292774 Masters et al. Nov 2007 B1
7292775 Boyle et al. Nov 2007 B1
7296284 Price et al. Nov 2007 B1
7302501 Cain et al. Nov 2007 B1
7302579 Cain et al. Nov 2007 B1
7318088 Mann Jan 2008 B1
7319806 Willner et al. Jan 2008 B1
7325244 Boyle et al. Jan 2008 B2
7330323 Singh et al. Feb 2008 B1
7346790 Klein Mar 2008 B1
7366641 Masiewicz et al. Apr 2008 B1
7369340 Dang et al. May 2008 B1
7369343 Yeo et al. May 2008 B1
7372650 Kupferman May 2008 B1
7380147 Sun May 2008 B1
7392340 Dang et al. Jun 2008 B1
7404013 Masiewicz Jul 2008 B1
7406545 Rothberg et al. Jul 2008 B1
7415571 Hanan Aug 2008 B1
7436610 Thelin Oct 2008 B1
7437502 Coker Oct 2008 B1
7440214 Ell et al. Oct 2008 B1
7451344 Rothberg Nov 2008 B1
7471483 Ferris et al. Dec 2008 B1
7471486 Coker et al. Dec 2008 B1
7486060 Bennett Feb 2009 B1
7496493 Stevens Feb 2009 B1
7518819 Yu et al. Apr 2009 B1
7526184 Parkinen et al. Apr 2009 B1
7539924 Vasquez et al. May 2009 B1
7543117 Hanan Jun 2009 B1
7551383 Kupferman Jun 2009 B1
7562282 Rothberg Jul 2009 B1
7577973 Kapner, III et al. Aug 2009 B1
7596797 Kapner, III et al. Sep 2009 B1
7599139 Bombet et al. Oct 2009 B1
7619841 Kupferman Nov 2009 B1
7647544 Masiewicz Jan 2010 B1
7649704 Bombet et al. Jan 2010 B1
7653927 Kapner, III et al. Jan 2010 B1
7656603 Xing Feb 2010 B1
7656763 Jin et al. Feb 2010 B1
7657149 Boyle Feb 2010 B2
7672072 Boyle et al. Mar 2010 B1
7673075 Masiewicz Mar 2010 B1
7688540 Mei et al. Mar 2010 B1
7724461 McFadyen et al. May 2010 B1
7725584 Hanmann et al. May 2010 B1
7730295 Lee Jun 2010 B1
7760458 Trinh Jul 2010 B1
7768776 Szeremeta et al. Aug 2010 B1
7804657 Hogg et al. Sep 2010 B1
7813954 Price et al. Oct 2010 B1
7817372 Takahashi Oct 2010 B2
7827320 Stevens Nov 2010 B1
7839588 Dang et al. Nov 2010 B1
7843660 Yeo Nov 2010 B1
7852596 Boyle et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859782 Lee Dec 2010 B1
7872822 Rothberg Jan 2011 B1
7898756 Wang Mar 2011 B1
7898762 Guo et al. Mar 2011 B1
7900037 Fallone et al. Mar 2011 B1
7907364 Boyle et al. Mar 2011 B2
7929234 Boyle et al. Apr 2011 B1
7933087 Tsai et al. Apr 2011 B1
7933090 Jung et al. Apr 2011 B1
7934030 Sargenti, Jr. et al. Apr 2011 B1
7940491 Szeremeta et al. May 2011 B2
7944639 Wang May 2011 B1
7945727 Rothberg et al. May 2011 B2
7949564 Hughes et al. May 2011 B1
7974029 Tsai et al. Jul 2011 B2
7974039 Xu et al. Jul 2011 B1
7982993 Tsai et al. Jul 2011 B1
7984200 Bombet et al. Jul 2011 B1
7990648 Wang Aug 2011 B1
7992179 Kapner, III et al. Aug 2011 B1
8004785 Tsai et al. Aug 2011 B1
8006027 Stevens et al. Aug 2011 B1
8014094 Jin Sep 2011 B1
8014977 Masiewicz et al. Sep 2011 B1
8019914 Vasquez et al. Sep 2011 B1
8040625 Boyle et al. Oct 2011 B1
8068306 Ramamoorthy et al. Nov 2011 B2
8078943 Lee Dec 2011 B1
8079045 Krapf et al. Dec 2011 B2
8082433 Fallone et al. Dec 2011 B1
8085487 Jung et al. Dec 2011 B1
8089719 Dakroub Jan 2012 B1
8090902 Bennett et al. Jan 2012 B1
8090906 Blaha et al. Jan 2012 B1
8091112 Elliott et al. Jan 2012 B1
8094396 Zhang et al. Jan 2012 B1
8094401 Peng et al. Jan 2012 B1
8116020 Lee Feb 2012 B1
8116025 Chan et al. Feb 2012 B1
8134793 Vasquez et al. Mar 2012 B1
8134798 Thelin et al. Mar 2012 B1
8139301 Li et al. Mar 2012 B1
8139310 Hogg Mar 2012 B1
8144419 Liu Mar 2012 B1
8145452 Masiewicz et al. Mar 2012 B1
8149528 Suratman et al. Apr 2012 B1
8154812 Boyle et al. Apr 2012 B1
8159768 Miyamura Apr 2012 B1
8161328 Wilshire Apr 2012 B1
8164849 Szeremeta et al. Apr 2012 B1
8174780 Tsai et al. May 2012 B1
8174782 Feliss et al. May 2012 B2
8174794 Dorius May 2012 B2
8190575 Ong et al. May 2012 B1
8194338 Zhang Jun 2012 B1
8194340 Boyle et al. Jun 2012 B1
8194341 Boyle Jun 2012 B1
8201066 Wang Jun 2012 B1
8271692 Dinh et al. Sep 2012 B1
8279550 Hogg Oct 2012 B1
8281218 Ybarra et al. Oct 2012 B1
8285923 Stevens Oct 2012 B2
8289656 Huber Oct 2012 B1
8305705 Roohr Nov 2012 B1
8307156 Codilian et al. Nov 2012 B1
8310775 Boguslawski et al. Nov 2012 B1
8315006 Chahwan et al. Nov 2012 B1
8316263 Gough et al. Nov 2012 B1
8320067 Tsai et al. Nov 2012 B1
8324974 Bennett Dec 2012 B1
8332695 Dalphy et al. Dec 2012 B2
8341337 Ong et al. Dec 2012 B1
8350628 Bennett Jan 2013 B1
8356184 Meyer et al. Jan 2013 B1
8370683 Ryan et al. Feb 2013 B1
8375225 Ybarra Feb 2013 B1
8375274 Bonke Feb 2013 B1
8380922 DeForest et al. Feb 2013 B1
8390948 Hogg Mar 2013 B2
8390952 Szeremeta Mar 2013 B1
8392689 Lott Mar 2013 B1
8407393 Yolar et al. Mar 2013 B1
8413010 Vasquez et al. Apr 2013 B1
8417566 Price et al. Apr 2013 B2
8421663 Bennett Apr 2013 B1
8422172 Dakroub et al. Apr 2013 B1
8427771 Tsai Apr 2013 B1
8429343 Tsai Apr 2013 B1
8433937 Wheelock et al. Apr 2013 B1
8433977 Vasquez et al. Apr 2013 B1
8458526 Dalphy et al. Jun 2013 B2
8462466 Huber Jun 2013 B2
8467151 Huber Jun 2013 B1
8489841 Strecke et al. Jul 2013 B1
8493679 Boguslawski et al. Jul 2013 B1
8498074 Mobley et al. Jul 2013 B1
8499198 Messenger et al. Jul 2013 B1
8512049 Huber et al. Aug 2013 B1
8514506 Li et al. Aug 2013 B1
8531791 Reid et al. Sep 2013 B1
8554741 Malina Oct 2013 B1
8560759 Boyle et al. Oct 2013 B1
8565053 Chung Oct 2013 B1
8576511 Coker et al. Nov 2013 B1
8578100 Huynh et al. Nov 2013 B1
8578242 Burton et al. Nov 2013 B1
8589773 Wang et al. Nov 2013 B1
8593753 Anderson Nov 2013 B1
8595432 Vinson et al. Nov 2013 B1
8599510 Fallone Dec 2013 B1
8601248 Thorsted Dec 2013 B2
8611032 Champion et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612650 Carrie et al. Dec 2013 B1
8612706 Madril et al. Dec 2013 B1
8612798 Tsai Dec 2013 B1
8619383 Jung et al. Dec 2013 B1
8621115 Bombet et al. Dec 2013 B1
8621133 Boyle Dec 2013 B1
8626463 Stevens et al. Jan 2014 B2
8630052 Jung et al. Jan 2014 B1
8630056 Ong Jan 2014 B1
8631188 Heath et al. Jan 2014 B1
8634158 Chahwan et al. Jan 2014 B1
8635412 Wilshire Jan 2014 B1
8640007 Schulze Jan 2014 B1
8654619 Cheng Feb 2014 B1
8661193 Cobos et al. Feb 2014 B1
8667248 Neppalli Mar 2014 B1
8670205 Malina et al. Mar 2014 B1
8683295 Syu et al. Mar 2014 B1
8683457 Hughes et al. Mar 2014 B1
8687306 Coker et al. Apr 2014 B1
8693133 Lee et al. Apr 2014 B1
8694841 Chung et al. Apr 2014 B1
8699159 Malina Apr 2014 B1
8699171 Boyle Apr 2014 B1
8699172 Gunderson et al. Apr 2014 B1
8699175 Olds et al. Apr 2014 B1
8699185 Teh et al. Apr 2014 B1
8700850 Lalouette Apr 2014 B1
8743502 Bonke et al. Jun 2014 B1
8749910 Dang et al. Jun 2014 B1
8751699 Tsai et al. Jun 2014 B1
8755141 Dang Jun 2014 B1
8755143 Wilson et al. Jun 2014 B2
8756361 Pruett et al. Jun 2014 B1
8756382 Carlson et al. Jun 2014 B1
8838995 Meyer et al. Sep 2014 B2
20090113702 Hogg May 2009 A1
20100306551 Meyer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110226729 Hogg Sep 2011 A1
20120159042 Lott et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120275050 Wilson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120281963 Krapf et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120324980 Nguyen et al. Dec 2012 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Ralf Brunner, U.S. Appl. No. 13/903,464, filed May 28, 2013, 22 pages.
C. Mathrew Mate, et al., Lubricant-Induced Spacing Increases at Slider-Disk Interfaces in Disk Drives, Tribol Letter, vol. 37, 2010, pp. 581-590.
B. Marchon, et al., “Lubricant Dynamics on a Slider: The Waterfall Effect,” Journal of Applied Physics 105, 074313-074313-5 , 2009.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61933139 Jan 2014 US