This invention relates to trading application program interfaces. More particularly, this invention relates to a trading interface having advanced features.
Electronically based trading systems have gained widespread popularity in recent years. Such trading systems are frequently used for trading items ranging from financial instruments (such as stocks, bonds, currency, futures contracts, etc.) to household goods (such as old records, antiques, wines, etc.). In many of these trading systems, bid/offer-hit/take processes are used to negotiate a sale of a given item. In connection with such processes, bids and/or offers for items are entered into a trading system and a hit or take is submitted in response to a bid or an offer, respectively, to agree to a sale.
Today, these trading systems are being developed with advanced processing circuitry and sufficient memory to support new types of software applications not previously envisioned. A challenge created by the new types of software applications is the ability to offer advanced features consistent with users' expectations of a trading interface environment.
Many implementations of electronic trading, while generally accurate, lack in desired speed mainly because traders are forced to use both a standard keyboard and a mouse to execute a trade. This dual process causes much delay for traders because the traders must follow several steps prior to executing a trade. For example, many traders using typical trading systems are required to click on an issue of choice, click on a buy or a sell button, and use the keyboard to enter a price and size for the trade.
The benefit of using a keyboard to execute a trade is that a trader may execute a trade with a great deal more speed than with a mouse. Specifically, with a keyboard, the trader may use all ten fingers, while with a mouse the trader may use two fingers at most.
Despite the drawbacks associated with using a mouse, many traders continue to use a mouse because it is considered easy to use, and thus traders feel that they are less likely to make unwarranted trading mistakes with a mouse. Because trading professionals frequently have large amounts of money at stake when trading, many professionals prefer to forgo speed and efficiency for peace of mind.
While mouse-based interfaces have existed for years, these interfaces have put traders using them at a disadvantage when competing with full-time keyboard traders. One reason the existing mouse-based interfaces place those traders at a disadvantage is that those traders are forced to physically move a mouse pointer from an indicator for a desired instrument, that is at some given point on a trading screen, to some other point on the screen where bidding/offering and buying/selling commands can be entered. This approach is very time-consuming and additionally distracts traders from focusing on market movements and other trades while they attempt to execute their trades.
Furthermore, traders may be interested in Treasuries other than the most recently issued Treasuries (i.e., the benchmark issue). The most recently issued Treasuries are said to be on-the-run. Other Treasuries are said to be off-the-run (i.e., non-benchmark issues). Because off-the-run Treasuries may lack liquidity, they routinely trade at spreads over comparable on-the-run Treasuries. Consequently, off-the-run Treasuries trade at slightly lower prices and higher yields.
Trading systems vary in the type and scope of features that they provide. Typical trading systems allow traders to trade on a benchmark or a non-benchmark issue by selecting the issue of choice, using a mouse to select a buy or a sell button, and using the keyboard to enter a price and size for the trade. One drawback of these trading systems is that non-benchmark issues are not easily accessible from the related benchmark issue.
In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide enhanced features and applications for a trading interface environment that enables a trader to execute trades on benchmark issues and non-benchmark issues quickly, efficiently, and accurately without the use of a pointing device.
In accordance with this and other objects of the invention, a trading interface having advanced features is provided. More particularly, in accordance with this invention, the trader can use various trading interfaces to create orders, manipulate orders, cancel orders, cycle through multiple issues, obtain trading information more relevant than limit price stacks (e.g., through different types of quadrants), or efficiently buy or sell items inside or within the spread market.
Traders may use a customized keyboard to navigate through the trading interface. The keyboard preferably includes issue keys that are pre-programmed to reflect the issues present in each trading quadrant, or “quad,” where key trading indicators are displayed. Using the issue keys on the keyboard, the trader may direct the trading application to quickly and efficiently switch between multiple issues in a quad (e.g., the benchmark issue and non-benchmark issues).
Using the keyboard, the trader may also be provided with price improvement functionality. The keyboard preferably includes a price improvement (“PI”) key. If desired, the PI key may be a BEST PI key. Submitting an order with a BEST PI level by, for example, pressing the PI key, may automatically allow the order to jump in front of other prices in the market, including other price improved prices.
The trader may also be provided with direct dealing or request for quote functionality. More particularly, the keyboard preferably includes a direct dealing (“DD”) key. Using the DD key along with other keys on the keyboard, the trader may perform such functions as request a quote, respond with a price, cancel a response, amend a response, or accept a response. In some embodiments, the trading application may simultaneously display a DD ticker along with the trading quadrant that provides the trader with the progression of the direct dealings of the selected issue.
Trading interfaces may also be provided. In response to initiating the trading application, the trading application may display the four benchmark U.S. Treasury bonds in a four quad layout. Each quad provides the trader with trading information. Each quad may also include non-benchmark issues that may be selected, for example, in response to a trader pressing one of the issue keys on the keyboard. The trading application may also provide the trader with the ability to obtain trading information (e.g., in the form of another quad) for each of the related U.S. Treasury swaps (“T-swaps”), off-the-runs, yield curve T-swaps, and basis.
The above and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with accompanying drawings, in which like reference refers to like parts throughout, and in which:
This invention relates to systems and methods for providing a trading interface with advanced features. The following embodiment of the invention relates to the electronic trading of fixed income related instruments—e.g., such as the United States Treasuries, United Kingdom Gilts, European Government Treasuries, and Emerging Market debts, swaps, repos, etc. This invention may also be used for the electronic trading of securities or other financial instruments, such as stocks or currencies, and is not limited only to the trading of fixed income related instruments. Nevertheless, this embodiment does not limit the invention to this particular subject matter. Rather, it is provided for illustration of the invention and not to limit it to a particular commodity or market.
It should also be noted that although the following embodiment of the invention relates to the trading of a single instrument, such as 30 Year U.S. Treasury bonds, this embodiment is not limited only to the trading of a single instrument. Rather, the invention may also be applied to the trading of a basket of instruments. For example, traders may place offers on the net price movements of the current two and five year U.S. Treasury notes.
It should also be noted that the present invention is primarily described herein in terms of a trading application. It will be understood that the trading application may be any suitable, software, hardware, or both configured to implement the features of the present invention. The trading application may be located at a central location (e.g., a central server). In another suitable approach, the trading application may reside among different locations (e.g., a network).
Although the trading application is described herein as being implemented on user computer equipment, this is only illustrative. The trading application may be implemented on any suitable platform (e.g., personal computer, palmtop computer, laptop computer, personal digital assistant, cellular phone, etc.) to provide such features.
Further details of the invention are described below with respect to
Referring to
In system 100, server 110 may be any suitable server, processor, computer, or data processing device, or combination of the same. Server 110 may be used to process and settle executed trades, and distribute trade and market information to workstations 102.
Communications network 106 may be any suitable computer network including the Internet, an intranet, a wide-area network (WAN), a local-area network (LAN), a wireless network, a digital subscriber line (DSL) network, a frame relay network, an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network, a virtual private network (VPN), or any combination of any of the same. Communications links 104 and 108 may be any communications links suitable for communicating data between workstations 102 and server 108, such as network links, dial-up links, wireless links, hard-wired links, etc.
Workstations 102 may be personal computers, laptop computers, mainframe computers, dumb terminals, data displays, Internet browsers, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), two-way pagers, wireless terminals, portable telephones, etc., or any combination of the same. Workstations 102 may be used to enter into and proceed with the trades that relate to the present invention, and display trade, benchmark, or spread information to traders of system 100.
Back office clearing center 114 may be any suitable equipment, such as a computer, a laptop computer, a mainframe computer, etc., or any combination of the same, for causing trades to be cleared and/or verifying that trades are cleared. Communications link 112 may be any communications links suitable for communicating data between server 110 and back office clearing center 114, such as network links, dial-up links, wireless links, hard-wired links, etc.
The server and the back office clearing center, and one of the workstations, which are depicted in
As shown in
Processor 202 may use the workstation program to present on display 204 trade information relating to bids, offers, executed trades, and luxury item information to a trader of workstation 102. Furthermore, input device 206 may be used by the trader to enter such bids and offers, modify them, and to enter into trades involving the futures and/or options contracts.
Server 110 may include processor 220, display 222, input device 224, and memory 226, which may be interconnected. In a preferred embodiment, memory 226 contains a storage device for storing trade information relating to the trades. The storage device further contains a server program for controlling processor 220. Processor 220 uses the server program to transact the purchase and sale of the futures and/or options contracts.
Back office clearing center 114 may include processor 228, display 230, input device 232, and memory 234, which may be interconnected. In a preferred embodiment, memory 234 contains a storage device for storing a clearing program for controlling processor 228. Processor 228 uses the clearing program to clear executed trades. Clearing executed trades may preferably include exchanging currency for a future commitment or a future option.
Input device 206 of workstation 102 may be used by traders in conjunction with display 204 to execute and monitor trades. It should be noted that trading is highly fluid and fast paced. Efficient input systems are important to effectuate the multiple options and to permits these levels of efficiency. Accordingly, input device 206 may include a keyboard with advanced features 300, as illustrated in
The lower twelve issue keys 310 are preferably pre-programmed to reflect the issues present in each trading quadrant, or “quad,” where key trading indicators are displayed. A trader may use keyboard 300 to switch between multiple issues in a quad (e.g., the benchmark issue and non-benchmark issues). An illustrative trading quadrant is shown, for example, in
In some embodiments, keyboard 300 may also include price improvement functionality. Price improvement, in accordance with the present invention, enables one or more traders to improve on an existing market trading price. For example, consider a market in which several buyers and sellers are submitting bids and offers for a selected item at a predetermined price. When one of the traders hits or lifts a bid/offer posted by another trader, thereby activating the active trader's side of the market for that item, the price at which the trader hit or lifted the bid becomes the “touch” price of the market. The touch price is the active market price for a selected item. Once a trade has been initiated, other traders may submit orders that improve on the touch price. When a trader submits a price improved order on a selected item, that trader may “jump in front” of other traders in a buying or selling stack. When an order “jumps in front” of other orders or is put on top of the stack, that order is in a position to be executed (e.g., used to fill an order) first when a buyer decides to buy or a seller decides to sell. A stack lists various order sizes for a particular item, and is typically arranged according to a predefined set of parameters.
As shown in
Systems and methods for providing price improvement in an active trading market are also described, for example, in co-pending, commonly-assigned Sweeting U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/171,009, filed Jun. 11, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In some embodiments, keyboard 300 may also include direct dealing (hereinafter “DD”), or request for quote functionality. In DD style trading, there are requestors and responders. A requestor may enter a request to deal on a particular item at the midpoint of the spread market, thereby providing an affirmative interest to trade at the midpoint. The requestor may enter a request with a specific midprice buy or sell order, or a requestor may request a midprice order to trade a specified size without indicating an interest to buy or sell. A responder may respond to that request by submitting an order to buy or sell the item at the midprice.
As shown in
Using DD key 330 and the other keys on keyboard 300, the trader may perform such functions as request a quote, respond with a price, cancel a response, amend a response, or accept a response. For example, to request a quote, the trader may press one of the issue keys 310 and then press DD key 330. The user may be prompted to enter a size. In response to entering a size and pressing one of the buy keys 315 or sell keys 320, the trading application may request a quote based on the entered information. In another example, the trader may direct the trading application to scroll through available direct dealings by pressing DD key 330 multiple times.
Systems and methods for providing a trading interface with a request for quote (RFQ) functionality are also described, for example, in co-pending, commonly-assigned Gilbert et al. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/113,841, filed in Mar. 29, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In some embodiments, keyboard 300 may include a VIEW key. In response to a trader pressing the VIEW key, the trading application may provide the trader with available views of the quad. For example, in response to the trader pressing an issue key, the trading application may provide the trader with the associated quad. In response to the trader subsequently pressing the VIEW key, the selected quad may cycle between different views (e.g., a curve quad, a t-swaps quad, an olds quad, etc.). Curves, such as a yield curve, may be used by traders to view the overall movement of interest rates or yields. In some embodiments, the quad may initially display the view that the trader last displayed.
However, any other suitable approach may also be used for displaying the quad. For example, the trading application may display the view that the trader most frequently viewed or the most popular view.
In some embodiments, keyboard 300 may include a STATUS TOGGLE key. In response to a trader pressing the STATUS TOGGLE key, the trading application may provide the trader with the trade history of the item or instrument. In response to the trader pressing the STATUS TOGGLE key multiple times, the trading application may cycle or toggle through different information relating to the item or instrument, such as, for example, the active orders for the item or instrument, the market history, or the status of the item or instrument.
Keyboard 300 also preferably includes a SHIFT key and an ALT key. The SHIFT key may direct the trading application to provide the trader with a snapshot or summary of the limit order stacks for the selected item or instrument. The ALT key may allow the trader to further program other functionality into keyboard 300. For example, a trader may implement other functions by, for example, holding down the ALT key and another key.
In some embodiments, the trading application may retrieve a keyboard mapping file from, for example, the trader's workstation. The trading application may read the keyboard mapping file and assign the keys of keyboard 300 to particular functions and/or macros. In some embodiments, the trading application may allow the trader to edit the keyboard mapping file to customize keyboard 300.
In the foregoing specification, keyboard 300 has been described with reference to specific embodiments. It will be understood that the arrangement of the keys, the color-coding of the keys, the key labels, and the functionality of the keys are illustrative examples. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present invention.
As described previously, issue keys 310 are preferably pre-programmed to reflect the issues present in a trading quadrant, or “quad,” where key trading indicators are displayed. A trader may use issue keys 310 to direct the trading application to switch between multiple issues in a quad.
Each quad provides the trader with trading information. As shown in the two year U.S. Treasury note quad 410, quad 410 includes a headline 412. Headline 412 is preferably adapted to include the price that should be initially aggressed to start a trade or the actual aggressed trade. In either case, the headline is generally located at the top of the quad. The headline may include the item (e.g., “USG_02Y), the price, the size, and the last price for the benchmark issue. The benchmark issue (also referred to herein as the “on-the-run issue”) is the most recently auctioned Treasury issues for each maturity. Also shown in quad 410 are bid and offer stacks 414 and 416, respectively. Bid and offer stacks 414 and 416 may indicate the size of one or many market participants that are bidding or offering at the current price.
As shown in
The T-swaps lock price 418 is L 100.032 in
Quad 410 and other quads generally may also include non-benchmark issues 420, 422, and 424 (e.g., issue 1.1, issue 1.2, and issue 1.3) that may be selected in response to the trader, for example, pressing one of the issue keys 310 on keyboard 300.
The trading application may also provide the trader with tabs for each of the related U.S. Treasury Swaps (T-swaps), off-the-runs (i.e., Treasury bonds issued before the most recently issued bond of a particular maturity), yield curve T-swaps, and basis. As shown in
In response to the trader selecting “Basis” tab 426, the trading application may provide the trader with a basis quad. The basis quad preferably contains the benchmark issue, “one-old” basis item or instrument, and the cheapest-to-deliver (CTD) bond.
When a bond matures, the seller has to deliver the underlying instrument. It is necessary to deliver a bond with the same characteristics. In some embodiments, certain futures contracts may require cash delivery. That is, a requirement of certain futures contracts is that the underlier should not be delivered to the buyer at maturity, and instead the value of the underlier should be paid out. Accordingly, a seller preferably finds the CTD bond from bonds available in the basket of deliverable bonds.
Generally, if the yield for the CTD bond changes by a given amount, the benchmark issue's yield also changes by a similar amount. It should be noted that the CTD bond may change quarterly. In some embodiments, the CTD bond may change intra-quarter.
In response to the trader selecting “Swaps” tab 428, the trading application may provide the trader with a treasury swaps (“T-swaps”) quad. The T-swaps quad preferably includes the three most recent benchmark bonds, where the oldest benchmark bond is replaced by the usg+0XY/XY T-swap (e.g., usg+05Y/05Y) when it becomes available. The T-swaps quad may also include the “pick up” and “give up” indicated yield spreads. The T-swaps quad, similar to the benchmark quad described previously and generally other quads, includes the T-swaps lock price bond and its associated lock price.
In response to the trader selecting “Olds” tab 430, the trading application may provide the trader with an off-the-runs quad. The off-the-run quad preferably includes the three most recent benchmark bonds, where the oldest benchmark bond is replaced by the usg+0XY instrument (e.g., usg+05Y) when it becomes available.
In response to the trader selecting “Curve” tab 432, the trading application may provide the trader with a curve quad. The curve quad preferably includes the yield curve T-swaps relevant to the benchmark selected. Yield curves provide traders with comparisons of the interest rate on instruments of different maturity. For example, if a trader thinks it is riskier to buy a bond with fifteen years until it matures than a bond with five years of life, the trader will demand a higher interest rate (i.e., yield) on the longer-dated bond. If such is the case, the yield curve will slope upwards from the shorter maturities (the left side of the curve) to right. Generally, the yield curve slopes upward because traders demand compensation for the added risk of holding longer-term instruments. Information may be gleaned from changes in the spreads between yields on bonds of different maturities and on different sorts of bonds with the same maturity.
The information contained in each quad is as follows, where the issue listed in the replacement column replaces the previous instrument (e.g., the top off-the-run bond) when it becomes available or active:
As described previously, the trading application may also provide the trader with direct dealing functionality. The trading application in which each quad operates may determine which DD orders, if any, are matched to each other. In order for DD orders to match, two orders have to be contra or opposite to each other. A buy DD order is contra to a sell DD order.
For example, assume that the requesting midprice DD order is a buy DD order with a size of 100. After the midprice interest is displayed, one or more market participants or traders may submit a midprice DD order (e.g., responding DD orders). If a second midprice DD order is a buy order for 100, that order is queued behind the initial order. Because both the initial and second orders are buy orders, the requesting order is queued first because it was submitted before the second order. If a midprice DD sell order of size 150 is received, the initial buy order is matched with a portion of the sell order and half of the second buy order is used to fill the sell order. As a result, a buy DD order of size 50 is currently available for midprice trading.
Each quad 410, 440, 450, and 460 preferably includes a direct dealing (“DD”) ticker 434. DD ticker 434 may include the orientation and size of the order. DD ticker 434 preferably changes its content according to the progression of the direct dealing. Table 2 below shows several examples of ticker content.
It should be noted that the direct dealing ticker contains real-time information on the progress of the direct dealing. The real-time information relating to the direct dealing may be displayed using any suitable approach.
At step 600, the trading application may be initiated and may provide the trader with an initial display. The initial display may provide traders with opportunities to log in, or may provide traders with access to other system features. In some embodiments, traders may be required to log in by, for example, entering a user name and a password. In other embodiments, traders may not be required to log in to access the features of the system.
At step 610, the trading application may display a trading quadrant (“quad”) that has a benchmark issue and multiple non-benchmark issues. The benchmark issue is currently selected. Along with providing the benchmark issue and non-benchmark issues (e.g., issues 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3), the trading application may also provide the trader with the ability to obtain trading information (e.g., another quad) for each of the related U.S. T-swaps, off-the-runs, yield curve T-swaps, and basis.
At step 620, the trading application may provide the trader with the ability to select one of the multiple non-benchmark issues by pressing the associated issue key on the keyboard, such as keyboard 300, that is mapped to the selected non-benchmark issue. For example, the trader may direct the trading application focus and display trading information on non-benchmark issue 2.1 in response to the trader pressing the issue 2.1 key on the keyboard. The issue 2.1 key is mapped to non-benchmark issue 2.1.
At step 700, the trading application may also provide the trader with direct dealing functionality. The trading application may receive direct dealing content for use in the trading quadrant. For example, a trader can submit a midprice direct dealing order, thereby making a bid/offer at the midprice. Once the order is entered, the trading application may display the start price (i.e., the midprice of the spread at the time the midprice direct dealing order was entered). At step 710, in response to receiving the direct dealing order, the trading application may update the direct dealing content in the direct dealing ticker to indicate to other traders that a midprice direct dealing order has been submitted. Other traders may submit responses to the midprice request. That is, traders may respond by submitting a buy or sell command with a particular size. Note that any number of traders may respond and the time at which the traders respond determines when the response will be matched, if it is matched at all.
At step 720, the trading application may simultaneously display the trading quadrant and the updated direct dealing ticker. In response to receiving responses and matching requests with responses, the trading application continuously updates the direct dealing content in the direct dealing ticker, thereby providing traders with a real-time progression of the direct dealing.
Thus, systems and methods for providing a trading interface with advanced features are provided. Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and that the present invention is limited only by the claims which follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/699,859 filed Oct. 31, 2003 (claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/423,618, filed Oct. 31, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2134118 | Foss | Oct 1938 | A |
3541526 | Levy et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
3656148 | Belcher et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3976840 | Cleveland et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4141001 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4551717 | Dreher | Nov 1985 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4873623 | Lane | Oct 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
4906117 | Birdwell | Mar 1990 | A |
D308693 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jun 1990 | S |
4951196 | Jackson | Aug 1990 | A |
4980826 | Wagner | Dec 1990 | A |
5038284 | Kramer | Aug 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5150118 | Finkle et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5181809 | Martin | Jan 1993 | A |
5193924 | Larson | Mar 1993 | A |
5195031 | Ordish | Mar 1993 | A |
5243331 | McCausland et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253940 | Abecassis | Oct 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339392 | Risberg et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347452 | Bay, Jr. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361199 | Shoquist et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367298 | Axthelm | Nov 1994 | A |
5373055 | Ohmae et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5463547 | Markowtiz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5579002 | Iggulden et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667319 | Satloff | Sep 1997 | A |
5668358 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5757292 | Amro et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774880 | Ginsberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5787402 | Potter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5802497 | Manasse | Sep 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5832462 | Midorikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
5845261 | McAbian | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien | Dec 1998 | A |
5873071 | Ferstenberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878139 | Rosen | Mar 1999 | A |
5905974 | Fraser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5914715 | Sasaki | Jun 1999 | A |
5915209 | Lawrence | Jun 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin | Jul 1999 | A |
5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926801 | Matsubara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5950176 | Keiser et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963923 | Garber | Oct 1999 | A |
5987419 | Hachino et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014627 | Togher et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016483 | Richard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029146 | Hawkins et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6085168 | Mori et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098051 | Lupien et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116066 | Gartner | Sep 2000 | A |
6119101 | Peckover | Sep 2000 | A |
6131085 | Rossides | Oct 2000 | A |
6134535 | Belzberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151588 | Tozzoli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6195647 | Martyn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199050 | Alaia et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211880 | Impink, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230146 | Alaia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230147 | Alaia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247000 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259044 | Paratore et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263321 | Daughtery, III | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272474 | Garcia | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278982 | Korhammer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282521 | Howorka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311178 | Bi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317727 | May | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317728 | Kane | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343278 | Jain et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363365 | Kou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6405180 | Tilfors et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6421653 | May | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434536 | Geiger | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438575 | Khan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477513 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505174 | Keiser et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510418 | Case et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519574 | Wilton et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538670 | Kido | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560580 | Fraser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6618039 | Grant et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625583 | Silverman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629082 | Hambrecht | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630927 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6738079 | Kellerman | May 2004 | B1 |
D491944 | Lutnick et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6750887 | Kellerman | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772132 | Kemp, II et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
D496663 | Lutnick et al. | Sep 2004 | S |
D497912 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
D498476 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6823318 | Creswell et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6828902 | Casden | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850907 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
D502467 | Lutnick et al. | Mar 2005 | S |
D503712 | Lutnick et al. | Apr 2005 | S |
D503713 | Lutnick et al. | Apr 2005 | S |
D503935 | Lutnick et al. | Apr 2005 | S |
D504131 | Lutnick et al. | Apr 2005 | S |
6903662 | Rix et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912126 | Rudd et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6963856 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965511 | Rudd et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
D516072 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
6996540 | May | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7000181 | Press | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003488 | Dunne et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
3249919 | Scantlin | May 2006 | A1 |
7076461 | Balabon | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080033 | Wilton et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7157651 | Rix et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177833 | Marynowski et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7212999 | Friesen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228289 | Brumfield et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243083 | Burns et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7283067 | Lutnick et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7389268 | Kemp et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392212 | Hancock et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392214 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392217 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400270 | Lutnick et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7496533 | Keith | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7523064 | Burns et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7552084 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565317 | West | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7599876 | Lo et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7685052 | Waelbroeck | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7828902 | Casden | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7882007 | Keith | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7991679 | Kirwin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019672 | Sweeting | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8200568 | Renton et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8688562 | Buck | Apr 2014 | B1 |
10331344 | Lutnick et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10379701 | Langridge | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20010003179 | Martyn et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010032175 | Holden et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037279 | Yeo | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020023037 | White | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023042 | Solomon | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026321 | Faris et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029180 | Kirwin et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020070915 | Mazza et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073014 | Gilbert | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082967 | Kaminsky et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082976 | Howorka | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091626 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107784 | Hancock et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128945 | Moss et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143689 | Naylor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143690 | Mahajan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154038 | Houston | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156716 | Adatia | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161690 | McCarthy et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163540 | Kishimoto | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169704 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178104 | Hausman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198815 | Greifeld et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004853 | Ram et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004862 | Lutnick et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009411 | Ram et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018569 | Eisenthal et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033239 | Gilbert | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035012 | Kurtenbach et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050888 | Satow et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065613 | Smith | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069830 | Morano et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083976 | McLister | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088501 | Gilbert | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097323 | Khalfan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097325 | Friesen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030149636 | Lutnick et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184585 | Lin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229571 | May | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236737 | Kemp et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030634 | Satow | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034591 | Waelbroeck et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044610 | Fraser et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059666 | Waelbroeck et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088242 | Ascher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093300 | Burns | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117292 | Brumfield et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117331 | Lutnick et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133506 | Glodjo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140998 | Gravina et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143538 | Korhammer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155868 | Hui | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158519 | Lutnick et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177335 | Beisiegel | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193519 | Sweeting et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210504 | Rutman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210511 | Waelbroeck et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210512 | Fraser et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218963 | Van Diepen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254804 | Peterffy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004852 | Whitney | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038731 | Sweeting et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038732 | Sweeting et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055304 | Lutnick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055305 | Lutnick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050222941 | Tull, Jr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075966 | Duka | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108079 | Langridge | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108653 | Langridge | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119966 | Sandholm et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125327 | Fishbain | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149428 | Gooch et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160032 | Lutnick et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171895 | Howorka et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216393 | Lutnick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240510 | Schweickert | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060007160 | Lutnick et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060059079 | Howorka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069635 | Ram et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080214 | Hausman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086726 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111983 | Malison | May 2006 | A1 |
20060190383 | May | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206410 | Kostov | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218071 | Sweeting | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218072 | Noviello | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229967 | Sweeting | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265304 | Brumfield et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265305 | Schluetter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271475 | Brumfield et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277136 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293996 | Lutnick | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027797 | Claus | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078752 | Cormack | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078753 | Cormack | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100735 | Kemp et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150708 | Billeci | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168275 | Busby et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174162 | Lutnick et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070226120 | Nanjundamoorthy | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244795 | Lutnick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244796 | Lutnick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250438 | Fraser et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255642 | Keith | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080001786 | Lutnick et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080071670 | Fraser et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071671 | Fraser et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077523 | Fraser et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080133401 | Gilbert | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140558 | Reuter et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090055307 | Choudary et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073004 | Lutnick et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090276348 | Kessler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100191641 | Mintz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100268637 | Burns et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110066536 | Milne | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110238594 | Griffin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238597 | Griffin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120166938 | Langridge | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120284163 | Langridge | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330811 | Lutnick et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130018772 | Lutnick et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054443 | Burns et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130138546 | Lutnick et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20190332240 | Lutnick et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190346979 | Langridge | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200184561 | Lutnick et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
691467 | May 1998 | AU |
2493971 | Jun 1998 | CA |
2732007 | Jun 2016 | CA |
3413604 | Oct 1985 | DE |
19606467 | Aug 1997 | DE |
0412308 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0416482 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0512702 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0733963 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0828223 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0993995 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1006472 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1416363 | May 2004 | EP |
2256954 | Dec 1992 | GB |
2258061 | Jan 1993 | GB |
2313276 | Nov 1997 | GB |
358161068 | Sep 1983 | JP |
59184929 | Oct 1984 | JP |
62-256164 | Nov 1987 | JP |
11-282600 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2003-525480 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2002-032565 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-214977 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-501333 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2002-297280 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2007-528559 | Oct 2007 | JP |
1992-700435 | Feb 1992 | KR |
WO 1985004271 | Sep 1985 | WO |
WO 1987003115 | May 1987 | WO |
WO 1993015467 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 1995026005 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 1996005563 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 1996034356 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 1997037315 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 1998026363 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 1998034187 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 1998049639 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 1998052133 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 1999019821 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 2000011588 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 2000067172 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 2000026745 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2000038093 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 2001050317 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 2001069366 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 2003026135 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2005045613 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005086785 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006108158 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Photographs of Cantor Fitzgerald Keyboard. |
Photographs of BrokerTec USA, LLC trading keyboard. |
“Hot Keys Now Available”, Success Trader Level II—Direct Access Trading, http://web.archive.org/web20020928124458 (printed Feb. 26, 2004). |
“NextTrend Releases Next Generation Electronic Direct Access Trading, EDAT, Technology Plus New and Expanded Market Analysis Features”, Business Wire, Oct. 29, 2001, 2 pages, www.findarticles.com/cf_dis/m0EIN/2001_Oct29/79515988/p1/article.jhtml (printed Mar. 2, 2004). |
“Neovest Updates Trade Execution”, Neovest High Performance Trading Technology, Aug. 31, 2001, http://www.neovest.com/recentarticles/article2001831.html (printed Mar. 2, 2004). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/147,218, dated Dec. 10, 2007 (4 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/147,218, dated Jan. 3, 2007 (5 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,859, dated Sep. 19, 2007 (13 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,859, dated May 22, 2008 (16 pages). |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,859, dated Jul. 3, 2008 (3 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081, dated Aug. 10, 2007 (12 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081, dated Mar. 3, 2008 (16 pages). |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081, dated Mar. 28, 2008 (3 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081, dated Apr. 30, 2008 (16 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957, dated Aug. 20, 2007 (11 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957, dated Feb. 28, 2008 (15 pages). |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957, dated Mar. 28, 2008 (3 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957, dated May 1, 2008 (15 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/126,781, dated Aug. 9, 2007 (4 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858, dated Feb. 25, 2008 (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/328,814, dated Apr. 10, 2009; 9 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858, dated May 6, 2009; 8 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,546, dated May 5, 2009; 17 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081, dated Feb. 2, 2009; 22 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957, dated Feb. 2, 2009; 20 pages. |
MAOI Technologies Announces IIVEeXCHANGE 2.1, PR Newswire, New York, Sep. 14, 1998, p. 1. Retrieved from ProQuest. |
Australian Examiners Report for AU Application No. 2007204680; 5 pages; dated Dec. 5, 2008. |
USPTO Pre-Brief Appeal Conference Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858, Dec. 9, 2009 (2 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858, dated Apr. 12, 2010 (8 pages). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957; dated Mar. 2, 2010; 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081; dated Mar. 1, 2010; 4 pages. |
Futures, “Guide to Computerized Trading 2003”, vol. XXXII, No. 8, 2003; pp. 1-5. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/051,708 dated Apr. 30, 2010; 6 pages. |
AU Examiner Report for AU Application No. 2007204680; 4 pages; dated Aug. 11, 2010. |
EP Office Action for Application No. 07710023.8; 6 pages; dated Jul. 5, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/328,814; 7 pages; dated Aug. 11, 2010. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2506980 dated Aug. 12, 2010; 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957 dated Feb. 3, 2011; 7 pages. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/051,708; dated Jan. 19, 2011; 9 pages. |
AU Examiner Report for AU Application No. 2005208492; 3 pages; dated Feb. 28, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,547 dated Mar. 29, 2011; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,547 dated Jul. 9, 2010; 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/328,814; 20 pages; dated Apr. 27, 2011. |
AU Examiner Report for AU Application No. 2010214769; 2 pages; dated Apr. 7, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,546; 10 pages; dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,951, dated May 6, 2011; 5 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858, dated Mar. 21, 2011; 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957; dated Feb. 3, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081; dated Feb. 3, 2011; 8 pages. |
EP Office Action for Application No. 05252856.9; 9 pages; dated Aug. 10, 2006. |
JP Office Action for JP Application No. 2006-549572; dated May 18, 2010; 9 pages (includes English Translation). |
EP Office Action for Application No. 03256926.1 dated Aug. 16, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081; dated Jun. 14, 2011; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957; dated Jun. 14, 2011; 1 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2005208492; dated Aug. 10, 2011; 2 pages. |
AU Second Examination Report for Application No. 2010214769; dated Jun. 22, 2011; 2 pages. |
JP Office Action for JP Application No. 2008-549691; dated Jul. 19, 2011; 8 pages (including English Translation). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,546; 11 pages; dated Oct. 7, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/328,814; 25 pages; dated Oct. 18, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,859; 36 pages; dated Sep. 30, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,957; dated Oct. 18, 2011; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,547 dated Oct. 13, 2011; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/715,081; dated Oct. 21, 2011; 18 pages. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/051,708 dated Nov. 16, 2011; 9 pages. |
EP Office Action for Application No. 05705585.7; dated Nov. 15, 2011; 5 pages. |
JP Office Action for JP Application No. 2008-549691; dated Mar. 29, 2012; 5 pages (including English Translation). |
EP Extended Search Report for EP Application No. 11192492.4; dated Jan. 25, 2012; 15 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,759; dated Oct. 25, 2012; 12 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/051,708; dated Sep. 17, 2012; 32 pages. |
CA Examiner's Report for CA Application No. 2,732,007; dated Jul. 30, 2012; 3 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,441; dated Dec. 21, 2012; 7 pages. |
CA Examiner's Report for CA Application No. 2,600,725; dated Jan. 18, 2012; 5 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,583; dated Nov. 26, 2012; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,546; 7 pages; dated Jul. 13, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,859; 20 pages; dated Jul. 8, 2013. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/051,708; dated May 23, 2013; 10 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,583; dated Jun. 19, 2013; 6 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858; dated Nov. 6, 2013; 20 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,759; dated Mar. 20, 2014; 7 pages. |
AU Patent Examination Report No. 1 for App. No. 2011253664; dated Mar. 31, 2014; 3 pages. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/051,708; dated Dec. 17, 2013; 11 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,441; dated Dec. 16, 2013; 6 pages. |
JP Office Action for App. No. 2012-221076; dated Jan. 14, 2014; 7 pages (w/English translation). |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,583; dated Dec. 16, 2013; 7 pages. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/699,858; dated Jul. 2, 2014; 10 pages. |
AU Examination Report No. 1 for App. No. 2013200036; dated Aug. 15, 2014; 3 pages. |
CA Examiners Requisition for App. No. 2,600,725; dated Jul. 30, 2014; 4 pages. |
JP Final Decision for App. No. 2012-221076; dated Nov. 18, 2014; 5 pages (w/English translation). |
EP Examination Report for App. No. 11192492.4; dated Apr. 17, 2015; 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130226760 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60423618 | Oct 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10699859 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 13620496 | US |